Medical expenditures associated with major depressive disorder among privately insured working-age adults with diagnosed diabetes in the United States, 2008

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: .
Diabetes research and clinical practice (Impact Factor: 2.54). 03/2013; 100(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.02.002
Source: PubMed


We aimed at estimating excess medical expenditures associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) among working-age adults diagnosed with diabetes, disaggregated by treatment mode: insulin-treated diabetes (ITDM) or non-insulin-treated diabetes (NITDM).

We analyzed data for over 500,000 individuals with diagnosed diabetes from the 2008 U.S. MarketScan claims database. We grouped diabetic patients first by treatment mode (ITDM or NITDM), then by MDD status (with or without MDD), and finally by whether those with MDD used antidepressant medication. We estimated annual mean excess outpatient, inpatient, prescription drug, and total expenditures using regression models, controlling for demographics, types of health coverage, and comorbidities.

Among persons having ITDM, the estimated annual total mean expenditure for those with no MDD (the comparison group) was $19,625. For those with MDD, the expenditures were $12,406 (63%) larger if using antidepressant medication and $7322 (37%) larger if not using antidepressant medication. Among persons having NITDM, the corresponding estimated expenditure for the comparison group was $10,746, the excess expenditures were $10,432 (97%) larger if using antidepressant medication and $5579 (52%) larger if not using antidepressant medication, respectively. Inpatient excess expenditures were the largest of total excess expenditure for those with ITDM and MDD treated with antidepressant medication; for all others with diabetes and MDD, outpatient expenditures were the largest excess expenditure.

Among working-age adults with diabetes, MDD was associated with substantial excess medical expenditures. Implementing the effective interventions demonstrated in clinical trials and treatment guidelines recommended by professional organizations might reduce the economic burden of MDD in this population.

12 Reads
    • "DiabetesPark et al. 2013;Shrestha et al. 2013). Although the causal effect of DM seems to be obvious, the link is rather bi-directional (Chen et al. 2013;Golden et al. 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rationale Depression is highly prevalent in diabetes (DM). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) which is mainly regulated by the endoplasmic reticulum chaperon sigma-1 receptor (S1R) plays a relevant role in the development of depression. Objectives We studied the dose-dependent efficacy of S1R agonist fluvoxamine (FLU) in the prevention of DM-induced depression and investigated the significance of the S1R-BDNF pathway. Methods We used streptozotocin to induce DM in adult male rats that were treated for 2 weeks p.o. with either different doses of FLU (2 or 20 mg/bwkg) or FLU + S1R antagonist NE100 (1 mg/bwkg) or vehicle. Healthy controls were also enrolled. Metabolic, behaviour, and neuroendocrine changes were determined, and S1R and BDNF levels were measured in the different brain regions. Results In DM rats, immobility time was increased, adrenal glands were enlarged, and thymuses were involuted. FLU in 20 mg/bwkg, but not in 2 mg/bwkg dosage, ameliorated depression-like behaviour. S1R and BDNF protein levels were decreased in DM, while FLU induced SIR-BDNF production. NE100 suspended all effects of FLU. Conclusions We suggest that disturbed S1R-BDNF signaling in the brain plays a relevant role in DM-induced depression. The activation of this cascade serves as an additional target in the prevention of DM-associated depression.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2016 · Psychopharmacology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comorbidity of depression and diabetes is common, and each disorder has a negative impact on the outcome of the other. The direction of causality is not certain as each disorder seems to act as both a risk factor and consequence for the other in longitudinal studies. This bidirectional association is possibly mediated by shared environmental and genetic risk factors. Comorbid depression is associated with reduced adherence to medication and self-care management, poor glycaemic control, increased health care utilization, increased costs and elevated risk of complications, as well as mortality in patients with diabetes. Psychological and pharmacological interventions are shown to be effective in improving depression symptoms; however, collaborative care programs that simultaneously manage both disorders seem to be most effective in improving diabetes-related outcomes.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2013 · Current Psychiatry Reports
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Describe treatment regimen changes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiating metformin monotherapy, and assess factors associated with those changes 12 months post-initiation. Retrospective cohort analysis of medical, pharmacy and laboratory claims of 17,527 Medicare Advantage (MAPD) Humana members aged 18-89, who had ≥1 medical claim with primary diagnosis or ≥2 medical claims with secondary diagnosis of T2DM (ICD-9-CM code 250.x0 or 250.x2) who filled an initial prescription for metformin (GPI code 2725) between 1/1/2008 and 9/30/2011. The main outcome measure was change in metformin monotherapy during the 12 months following initiation. Factors associated with treatment changes during follow-up were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Fifty-nine percent of patients (mean age 69.6 years) remained on metformin monotherapy with no changes. Discontinuation was the most common treatment change (33%), followed by addition (5%), and switching (2%) to other antidiabetics. Of patients who discontinued treatment (median time to discontinuation=90 days), 61% did not reinitiate any diabetic treatment during the follow-up period. Among patients who added or switched to other antidiabetics, sulfonylureas were the most common addition or replacement agent. Predictors of discontinuation were being female, Black or Hispanic, low-income subsidy-eligible, having higher initial out-of-pocket metformin costs, or a diagnosis of depression. Discontinuation was less likely during follow-up if patients had higher pre-index pill burdens or records of a pre-index A1C screening test. A higher risk of discontinuation was observed for patients with low baseline A1C. One study limitation was that exact discontinuation dates could not be determined using claims. The findings suggest that gender, race, ethnicity, depression, and low income status were contributory factors to metformin discontinuation. More intensive monitoring and treatment adjustments may be warranted for patients newly initiated on metformin. This could ultimately improve morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with poor glycemic control.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2015 · Current Medical Research and Opinion