ArticlePDF Available

The changing status of invertebrate pests and the future of pest management in the Australian grains industry

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The Australian grains industry is dealing with a shifting complex of invertebrate pests due to evolving management practices and climate change as indicated by an assessment of pest reports over the last 20-30 years. A comparison of pest outbreak reports from the early 1980s to 2006-07 from south-eastern Australia highlights a decrease in the importance of pea weevils and armyworms, while the lucerne flea, Balaustium mites, blue oat mites and Bryobia mites have increased in prominence. In Western Australia, where detailed outbreak records are available from the mid 1990s, the relative incidence of armyworms, aphids and vegetable weevils has recently decreased, while the incidence of pasture cockchafers, Balaustium mites, blue oat mites, redlegged earth mites, the lucerne. ea and snails has increased. These changes are the result of several possible drivers. Patterns of pesticide use, farm management responses and changing cropping patterns are likely to have contributed to these shifts. Drier conditions, exacerbated by climate change, have potentially reduced the build-up of migratory species from inland Australia and increased the adoption rate of minimum and no-tillage systems in order to retain soil moisture. The latter has been accompanied by increased pesticide use, accelerating selection pressures for resistance. Other control options will become available once there is an understanding of interactions between pests and beneficial species within a landscape context and a wider choice of 'softer' chemicals. Future climate change will directly and indirectly influence pest distributions and outbreaks as well as the potential effectiveness of endemic natural enemies. Genetically modified crops provide new options for control but also present challenges as new pest species are likely to emerge.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The changing status of invertebrate pests and the future of pest
management in the Australian grains industry
Ary A. Hoffmann
A,D
, Andrew R. Weeks
B
, Michael A. Nash
A
, G. Peter Mangano
C
and Paul A. Umina
A
A
Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research (CESAR), Bio21 Molecular Science Institute,
Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
B
CESAR, Bio21 Molecular Science Institute, Department of Genetics, The University of Melbourne,
Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
C
Western Australian Department of Agriculture and Food, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.
D
Corresponding author. Email: ary@unimelb.edu.au
Abstract. The Australian grains industry is dealing with a shifting complex of invertebrate pests due to evolving
management practices and climate change as indicated by an assessment of pest reports over the last 2030 years.
A comparison of pest outbreak reports from the early 1980s to 200607 from south-eastern Australia highlights a decrease in
the importance of pea weevils and armyworms, while the lucerne ea, Balaustium mites, blue oat mites and Bryobia mites
have increased in prominence. In Western Australia, where detailed outbreak records are available from the mid 1990s, the
relative incidence of armyworms, aphids and vegetable weevils has recently decreased, while the incidence of pasture
cockchafers, Balaustium mites, blue oat mites, redlegged earth mites, the lucerne ea and snails has increased. These changes
are the result of several possible drivers. Patterns of pesticide use, farm management responses and changing cropping
patterns are likely to have contributed to these shifts. Drier conditions, exacerbated by climate change, have potentially
reduced the build-up of migratory species from inland Australia and increased the adoption rate of minimum and no-tillage
systems in order to retain soil moisture. The latter has been accompanied by increased pesticide use, accelerating selection
pressures for resistance. Other control options will become available once there is an understanding of interactions between
pests and benecial species within a landscape context and a wider choice of softerchemicals. Future climate change will
directly and indirectly inuence pest distributions and outbreaks as well as the potential effectiveness of endemic natural
enemies. Genetically modied crops provide new options for control but also present challenges as new pest species are likely
to emerge.
Introduction
Agricultural production in southern Australia has intensied as
farming systems have moved from low intensity grazing of native
grasslands to wide-scale cropping and high intensity grazing
based on introduced pastures containing perennial ryegrass
(Lolium perenne) and subterranean clovers (Trifolium
subterraneum) (BRSA 2001). The present shift towards annual
cropping systems often based on shorter rotations of pasture and
increased frequency of wheat, barley and canola is driven by an
economic rationale that has coincided with an increased use of
fertilisers [nitrogen (N) and phosphorus], and an increased
reliance on the chemical control of pests, similar to the
worldwide trend (Tilman et al. 2002).
Invertebrate pest control in Australia has relied on chemical
applications and host plant resistance for over 100 years. Modern
crop varieties are often susceptible to pests due to a loss of plant
host resistance mechanisms (Norton et al. 1999). This is typied
in canola, a derivative of rapeseed that has reduced levels
of erucic acid (<2%) and glucosinolates (<30 mmol/g of
aliphatic glucosinolates) chemicals that typically increase
plant resistance (Busch et al. 1994). Since the adoption and
subsequent increases in the area planted to susceptible canola
varieties, the amount of pesticide usage has increased (e.g. Moens
and Glen 2002). Increased chemical applications often lead to
changes in pest complexes (Pimentel et al. 1991; Huffaker et al.
1999). Species with relatively high levels of tolerance or the
ability to evolve resistance to chemicals can increase in
frequency. Increased chemical use can also lead to more
complex changes at higher trophic levels that inuence the
structure of pest communities (Stark et al. 2007).
Changes in climate, and farm management responses to these
changes, are also starting to inuence pest complexes.
Traditionally, Australian growers are adept at making the most
of limiting factors, which increasingly includes low moisture
availability (Perry et al. 1977). By changing management
practices to control availability of water in agricultural
systems, production can be maintained. In wetter southern
areas where production is expanding, new technologies are
being used such as controlled trafc, raised beds to alleviate
waterlogging and conservation tillage that retains crop residues
(stubble) on the soil surface. In northern areas, including the ood
plains of northern New South Wales and southern Queensland
CSIRO PUBLISHING Overview
www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ajea Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2008, 48, 14811493
CSIRO 2008 10.1071/EA08185 0816-1089/08/121481
that lie on the temperate/tropical overlap, unreliable winter
rainfall means sowing of crops is dependent on subsoil
moisture rather than rainfall during the growing season, and
growers maintain moisture and soil structure by avoiding over-
tillage and compaction. These changes can lead to new pest
pressures.
Although there is much speculation about the effects of
management practices, climate change and altered pesticide
applications on shifts in pest complexes, these are poorly
documented. There is no validated monitoring of changes in
pest pressures over time, or of the relative importance of different
pests in crops. There is also no systematic evaluation of how
landscape level changes (e.g. shelterbelts, revegetation) and
genetically modied (GM) crops might impact on pest control
in the future.
This paper attempts to gain some understanding of the nature
of changing pest pressures over the last few decades in southern
Australia along with future prospects for pest control. Changes in
pest importance are identied and interpreted in terms of likely
drivers including altered management, pesticide pressures and
climatic variability. The possible effects of climate change on the
distribution and abundance of pest and benecial organisms are
considered. The issue of pest control in GM crops is briey
discussed now that the moratorium on GM plantings for food
crops has been lifted across several Australian States and the
impact of possible landscape level changes on pest control are also
considered.
Tracking changes in pest pressures
There are no routine quantitative assessments of the importance of
different pests in the Australian grains industry. Nevertheless,
there are indirect ways in which changes might be assessed. Here
we consider changes evident from pest report bulletins in two
geographically distant regions: Victoria/southern New South
Wales, and Western Australia.
The Victorian/southern New South Wales bulletins were
started in the early 1980s by the Agricultural Division (now
known as the Department of Primary Industries) of the Victorian
Government. These bulletins listed records of invertebrate pest
outbreaks (including pest outbreaks that were encountered and
controlled as well as ones that were difcult to control) in Victoria
and some parts of New South Wales, and were typically
produced on a monthly basis. We obtained bulletins covering
three periods: 198084, 198589, and 199094. In addition, we
considered information from the more recent Pestfacts South-
Eastern bulletins that have been disseminated through the Centre
for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research at The
University of Melbourne. These reports were based on
information from a network of agronomists and extension
workers in Victoria and New South Wales. Data from the
bulletins were available for the 2006 and 2007 growing
seasons. Pestfacts South-Eastern is issued on an as needed
basis and there are typically 13 bulletins over the winter
growing season (from April to November).
The Western Australian information was collated from the
PestFax bulletins that have been produced by the Department of
Agriculture and Food of the Western Australian Government.
These bulletins are produced on a weekly basis over the winter
growing season; typically 26 bulletins from April to November.
PestFax bulletins have been issued concurrently since 1996 and
are generated from an extensive network of researchers,
agronomists and extension workers.
Outbreak records are an imperfect means for assessing the
relative importance of different pests. They rely on assessments of
pests by extension workers even though the pest species might
not always be correctly identied. Some minor or localised
outbreaks might go undetected or unreported. Thus, these
records do not fully represent the entire matrix of invertebrate
pest-crop outbreaks. These records also do not indicate the
relative economic effects of particular pests, only the presence
of an outbreak. Specic pests of less widely grown crops
(e.g. some pulses) may not be reported as frequently as other
species attacking common crops such as wheat and canola.
Nevertheless, the bulletins are likely to reect common pest
issues and provide an indication of changes in pest status
across years.
All records of invertebrate pest outbreaks reported in the
bulletins were included here. There was no attempt at
controlling the quality of the information; however, the
majority of reports were from trained and experienced
agronomists, State department staff and other industry
representatives. For the Victorian/southern New South Wales
outbreak data, there were 258, 132, 244, and 295 records for the
198084, 198589, 199094 and 200607 periods, respectively.
For Western Australia, outbreak numbers were higher and,
therefore, considered on a yearly basis rather than within
periods. Records increased over time, ranging from 61 in 1996
to 199 in 2007. As we were interested in changes in the relative
incidence of invertebrate pests over time, the summation of
reports for each period (Victoria/southern New South Wales)
or year (Western Australia) for an individual pest was divided by
the number of records for pests in that period or year. For instance,
if there was a total of 100 records in a period, consisting of 38
records of one species, this species would be designated as having
a relative incidence of 0.38 for that period.
The Victorian/southern New South Wales outbreak data
indicate substantial changes in the relative incidence of pests
over the last 25 years (Fig. 1). Outbreaks of armyworms (Family:
Noctuidae), which were common in the 1980s are rare in recent
times. Cutworms (Agrotis spp.), loopers (Family: Geometridae),
wireworms (Family: Elateridae), pea weevils (Bruchus pisorum),
underground grass grubs (Oncopera fasciculate) and pasture
webworms (Hednota spp.) also appear less frequently in recent
records than they did in the early 1980s. In contrast, lucerne eas
(Sminthurus viridis) and the redlegged earth mite (Halotydeus
destructor) seem to have increased in abundance. New pests that
have appeared in outbreak records in the period 200607 for the
rst time include Bryobia mites (Bryobia spp.), blue oat mites
(Penthaleus spp.), Balaustium mites (Balaustium medicagoense)
and slaters (Order: Isopoda). Native budworm (Helicoverpa
puntigera), pasture cockchafers (Family: Scarabaeidae) and
aphids (Family: Aphididae) have remained important pests
throughout the 25-year period.
In Western Australia, where more complete records were
available, the relative incidence of pests was regressed against
the year to identify groups that tended to increase or decrease
over time. Aphids, native budworm, diamondback moth
1482 Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture A. A. Hoffmann et al.
(a) Victoria/southern New South Wales
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
Aphids (various)
Armyworms (various)
Balaustium mite
Blue oat mite
Bryobia mite
Cabbage centre grub
Cabbage white butterfly
Cockchafers (various)
Cutworms (various)
Diamondback moth
False wireworm
Black field cricket
Grasshoppers (various)
Loopers (various)
Lucerne flea
Native budworm
Pasture webworm
Pea weevil
Redlegged earth mite
Rutherglen bug
Sitona weevil
Slugs (various)
Snails (various)
True wireworm
Underground grass grub
Weevils (misc)
Early 1980s
Late 1980s
Early 1990s
2006–07
(b) Western Australia
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
African black beetle
Aphids (various)
Armyworms (various)
Balaustium mite
Blue oat mite
Bronzed field beetle
Bryobia mite
Cockchafers (various)
Cutworms (various)
Desiantha weevil
Diamondback moth
European earwig
False wireworm
Grasshoppers (various)
Loopers (various)
Lucerne flea
Native budworm
Onion fly
Pasture day moth
Pasture webworm
Pea weevil
Redlegged earth mite
Rutherglen bug
Slugs (various)
Small lucerne weevil
Snails (various)
Thrips (various)
Vegetable beetle
Vegetable weevil
Weed web moth
Weevils (misc)
Incidence of pest outbreaks (proportion of total)
Pest taxa
Fig. 1. Relative incidence of outbreaks of pests in (a) Victoria/southern New South Wales from the early 1980s and (b) Western Australia from 1996. All outbreaks in a period were summed
and the proportion associated with a particular pest determined.
Changing status of invertebrate pests of grains Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1483
(Plutella xylostella), lucerne ea and mites are important pest
species (Fig. 1). Only groups where linear regressions indicated
effects of year accounting for a substantial proportion of the
variation (R
2
>0.25), are presented. These analyses indicated that
the relative incidence of aphid pests has decreased over the last
10 years, along with the relative incidence of armyworms and
vegetable weevils (Listroderes difcilis) (Fig. 2). In contrast, the
relative incidence of lucerne ea, Balaustium mites, blue oat
mites, redlegged earth mites, snails and pasture cockchafers has
increased (Fig. 3).
Some of these changes may reect shifts in the type and
total acreage of crops being grown and the areas where they are
sown. In other cases, an increase in the status of a new pest
might reect a new invasion. Many of Australias broadacre pests
are introduced species, and the pest status of an invader will
increase as it colonises new areas. The recent occurrence of
Bryobia mites as a pest in Victoria/southern New South Wales
may reect a new incursion. However, dramatic changes in
the pest status of species can occur even when they have
been resident for some time. For instance B. medicagoense
appears to have been present since the 1930s, around which
time it was probably introduced from South Africa (Halliday
2001). This species was initially regarded as a benecial mite
in the 1990s (James et al. 1995). However, in the last 10 years,
this mite has clearly been identied as responsible for crop
damage in both western and south-eastern Australia.
Improved species identication and increased awareness
may also have led to some changes in the importance of pest
species. For instance, the damage caused by blue oat mites in
southern Australia has previously been underrepresented owing
to their frequent misidentication as another pest species, the
redlegged earth mite. It is only recently that the correct
identication of these species has been shown to be important
for control (Robinson and Hoffmann 2001; Umina and Hoffmann
2004). This has increased awareness and may be responsible for
the increase in reports of blue oat mites (Fig. 1). Similarly, the
decrease in vegetable weevil (Listroderes difcilis) incidence in
Western Australia may be partially attributed to increased
awareness of other pest weevil species such as desiantha
(Steriphus diversipes) and small lucerne weevil (Artichonotus
taeniatulus) (Mangano and Severtson 2008). Mandolotus
(Mandalotus spp.) weevil and grey banded leaf weevil
(Ethemaia sellata) have also recently increased in prominence
in eastern Australia (http://cesarconsultants.com.au/services/
pestfacts-3.html, veried 5 October 2008).
Pesticide usage as a driver
The use of pesticides has been, and continues to be, the most
common management option for the control of Australian
invertebrate pests (Beaulieu and Weeks 2007). Over
$1.8 billion was spent nationally on pesticides in 2004, with
over 5000 t of the most widely used insecticide group, the
organophosphates, being applied annually (Radcliffe 2002).
Synthetic pyrethroids were introduced as an alternative to the
environmentally unsuitable organochlorines, cyclodienes and
some organophosphorus chemicals (Morton and Collins 1989).
Pyrethroids possess an inherently high activity and can be applied
at extremely low doses for the control of a huge range of
agricultural pests. They are generally considered to have lower
impacts on wildlife in the surrounding environment, degrade
quickly, are immobile in the soil (Elliott 1989), and are a cheaper
alternative to most other chemical classes. An application of
a-cypermethrin, a pyrethroid commonly used to control several
Australian grain pests, has a minimum cost of only $0.60 per ha
(Moore and Moore 2007). These attributes have resulted in the
widespread adoption of synthetic pyrethroids, which now
(a) Aphids
R2 = 0.3364
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
(b) Armyworms
R2 = 0.3204
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
(c) Vegetable weevils
R2 = 0.2517
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Incidence of pest outbreaks (proportion of total)
Year
Fig. 2. Changes in the incidence of outbreaks of pests that have decreased
in relative importance in Western Australia between 1996 and 2007.
1484 Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture A. A. Hoffmann et al.
account for more than 25% of the world insecticide market
(Hemingway et al. 2004).
Many of the changes observed in pest species over the last
2030 years could have been driven by increases in chemicals
applied to Australian agroecosystems, particularly the use of
synthetic pyrethroids. There are numerous pests, including the
redlegged earth mite, blue oat mites, Balaustium mites and the
lucerne ea, which have increased in relative incidence in
Western Australia and Victoria/southern New South Wales.
Blue oat mites, lucerne ea and Balaustium mites have
recently been shown to have a higher natural tolerance to a
range of chemical classes when compared with other groups
(Umina and Hoffmann 1999; Robinson and Hoffmann 2000;
Arthur et al. 2008; Roberts et al. 2008). In particular, these species
have a relatively high tolerance level to several synthetic
pyrethroids that are routinely used in the grains industry.
Balaus tium mites
R2 = 0.5009
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Blue oat mites
R2 = 0.4961
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
Cockchafers
R2 = 0.5664
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040 Lucerne fleas
R2 = 0.2500
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
Redlegged earth mites
R2 = 0.4265
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Snails
R2 = 0.385
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
Incidence of pest reports (proportion of total)
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Year
Fig. 3. Changes in the incidence of outbreaks of pests that have increased in relative importance in Western
Australia between 1996 and 2007.
Changing status of invertebrate pests of grains Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1485
The indiscriminate nature of broad-spectrum pesticides often
results in the death of natural enemies and other benecial
invertebrates, which can potentially create or enhance pest
problems (Readshaw 1975). Moreover, it is widely accepted
that a common outcome of the heavy reliance on chemicals for
control is the emergence of secondary pests (Jutsum et al. 1998;
Hopper 2003). Given their high natural tolerance, it is likely that
blue oat mites, Balaustium mites and lucerne eas are persisting
after chemical control of other pests. For examples, previous
research has shown that earth mite species compete with each
other (Weeks and Hoffmann 2000; Umina and Hoffmann 2005)
and other pests such as the lucerne ea (Michael et al. 1997),
suggesting the suppression or eradication of one pest species will
lead to an increase in the relative incidence of another. This may
account for some of the changes in earth mite pests found in
Western Australia and Victoria/southern New South Wales
(Fig. 1). Redlegged earth mites are often relatively more
susceptible to pesticides (Robinson and Hoffmann 2000;
Arthur et al. 2008; Roberts et al. 2008). However, the
development of tolerance to organophosphorus pesticides
(Hoffmann et al. 1997) and more recently resistance to
synthetic pyrethroids (Umina 2007) could be contributing to
the resurgence of this pest.
Climate change as a driver
Grain production appears to be inuenced by climate change. For
wheat, maize and barley, there has been a negative response of
global yields due to decreased rainfall and increased temperatures
(Lobell and Field 2007). Over the next few decades, climate is
further expected to decrease grain yields. For example, in south-
eastern Australia, wheat yields are expected to decrease by around
25% unless this can be offset by crop breeding and changes in
farming practices (Anwar et al. 2007). There are several scenarios
about the impacts and opportunities associated with climate
change for Australian farmers in the future. For example,
temperatures during winter months will be warmer and there
will be less rainfall and increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO
2
)
(CSIRO 2007).
Climate change is already likely to have contributed to
changes in the relative importance of invertebrate pests in
recent times. The decrease in incidence of armyworm
outbreaks in recent years appears to be associated with the
advent of drier conditions. Typically, large infestations of this
pest occur after heavy autumn rains. For instance, in 1988 and
1989, there were large outbreaks in south-east Queensland and
parts of New South Wales following heavy rains (McDonald et al.
1995). Outbreaks depend on the establishment of large
populations on winter grass hosts and migration to crops
(McDonald et al. 1995). However, high winter rainfall
conditions have been rare in the last two decades (see
http://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au/recentchanges.php,
veried 5 October 2008), and this has probably prevented the
build-up of populations of this pest. Another pest that is likely to
be inuenced by the changing availability of breeding resources
away from cropping areas is H. punctigera. This species
builds up to high numbers on non-crop plants in central
Australia over winter and then migrates to cropping regions
in spring (Gregg et al. 2001). Outbreaks are linked to rainfall
events that allow for build-up of host plants and the direction of
weather patterns facilitating the migration of moths into
agricultural areas (Fitt et al. 1995; Maelzer et al. 1996).
When the distribution of pests is limited by climatic
variables, future distribution limits may expand or contract
directly in response to climate change.
For two species of blue oat mite, Penthaleus major and
P. falcatus, moisture and heat have been identied as the two
main factors limiting their inland distribution in south-eastern
Australia; however, it is not clear what limits their northern
distribution (Robinson and Hoffmann 2001). The distribution
of redlegged earth mites has also been linked to temperature and
moisture (Wallace and Mahon 1971a) although it is also not clear
if these variables can explain shifts in the distribution of this
species over the last 2030 years (Weeks and Hoffmann 1999;
Robinson and Hoffmann 2001). The inland distribution of blue
oat mites and redlegged earth mites will probably contract as
conditions become drier. However, changes in the distribution of
other mite species are harder to predict. In particular, the
distribution of a third blue oat mite pest, Penthaleus tectus,
which occupies disjunct areas in the Victorian Mallee and
inland New South Wales (Robinson and Hoffmann 2001) as
well as in Western Australia (A. Arthur, pers. comm.), is not easily
linked to climatic variables (Robinson and Hoffmann 2001). A
greater understanding of species distribution shifts requires
mechanistic models that consider the biological attributes of
species and how they interact with the environment (Kearney
and Porter 2004). Such models and biological information are not
yet widely available for grains pests although predictive models
of population growth and migration patterns have been developed
and tested for Helicoverpa spp. (Fitt et al. 1995; Dufeld and
Steer 2006).
Slugs in cropping systems are another group likely to respond
to climate change. The key requirement for activity in slugs is
moisture (Young and Port 1991; Chio et al. 2004). The present dry
conditions may be reducing outbreaks of slugs overall, as
suggested by patterns from past records (Fig. 1). Additionally,
the species composition of slug communities may be altered. The
main pest across southern Victoria is currently Deroceras
reticulatum (Horne 2004); however, there is an increase in
Milax gagates in some slug communities particularly
following drought conditions (Nash 2008). M. gagates,a
burrowing species, appears to be behaviourally better adapted
to drier environments (South 1992). This shift would have direct
consequences on crop protection, as M. gagates is harder to
control using conventional molluscicides and can cause
more plant damage per individual (Crawford-Sidebotham
1970; Godan 1983).
Climate change can inuence pests and benecial organisms
through interactions with plant responses to CO
2
. In general,
elevated levels of CO
2
reduce the nutritional value of plants,
decreasing the performance of invertebrates feeding on them
(Zvereva and Kozlov 2006). This might result in an increased
level of plant damage because the pests have to consume more
plant tissue to acquire similar levels of nutrition. However, there
might also be negative effects on benecial predators and
parasitoids if their prey is smaller and of poorer quality.
1486 Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture A. A. Hoffmann et al.
Conversely, the number of prey consumed by predators might
then be increased and lead to improved pest control through
benecial invertebrates. Thus far, few evaluations relevant to the
Australian grains industry have been undertaken. Coll and
Hughes (2008) considered the interaction between an
omnivorous pentatomid bug (Oechalia schellenbergii) and
the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) when feeding on
peas. In this case the pea plants had reduced N content when
grown under higher levels of CO
2
and this in turn inuenced
the size of the bollworm larvae. Moreover, the predators
were more effective under higher CO
2
levels because they
appeared to be better at subduing the smaller cotton bollworm
larvae. This suggests that higher CO
2
could make generalist
predators more effective. However, Gao et al. (2008)
suggested that the aphid Aphis gossypii may become a more
serious pest under elevated CO
2
concentrations because of
increased survivorship of the aphid and the longer
development time of one of its main predators, Propylaea
japonica.
The effects of climate change on benecial invertebrates, and
hence the levels of control they are likely to exert, will be complex
and depend on factors other than those mediated through changes
in plant host quality. Other factors that need to be considered are
the relative thermal resistance of benecial species and their hosts
including acclimation effects, the impact of temperature on
population growth, host searching by benecial species and
competitive interactions, the ability of prey to counter
predators and parasitoids, and interactions between thermal
conditions and symbionts inside predators and prey (Stacey
2003; Hance et al. 2007). At present, we know very little
about interactions between grains pests, natural enemies and
environmental factors. Until more information becomes
available on the effects of temperature, CO
2
and moisture on
tritrophic interactions within cropping environments, it is
difcult to make predictions about whether control imposed by
natural enemies will improve or decline under climate change
(Hoover and Newman 2004).
Changing farming practices as a driver
Changes in farm management practices over the last 2030 years
are likely to have had direct and/or indirect effects on invertebrate
pests. Changes in sowing times have often occurred in
response to climate, and these may impact on spring pests
(Glen 2000). Minimum or no-tillage systems are becoming the
norm in the Australian grains industry partly in response to
altered rainfall patterns (Ugalde et al. 2007). These systems
are likely to increase invertebrate biodiversity (Stinner and
House 1990; Robertson 1993), but may also lead to changes in
pest complexes. For instance, no-tillage systems with stubble
retention often increase seedling loss due a more favourable
microenvironment for slug (Glen et al. 2003) and snail
(Baker 2002; Lenard et al. 2003) populations. Management
changes also inuence many benecial species that help
control pests. For example, carabid beetles (Family:
Carabidae), effective predators of slugs, wireworms and
moth larvae, are favoured in reduced tillage systems
(Andersen 1999, 2003).
Irrigation practices can inuence the distribution of pest
species. One pest whose importance appears to be increasing
due to irrigation is the lucerne ea, S. viridis. This species depends
on warm and dry summers to successfully complete diapause, and
adequate moisture in winter to allow populations to develop on
lucerne and other host crops (Wallace and Mahon 1971b). These
constraints have restricted the northerly and easterly distribution
of lucerne ea in southern Australia within the 250- and 225-mm
isohyets, respectively. However, lucerne ea has recently spread
outside this zone, particularly in areas where lucerne and pastures
as well as other crops are irrigated (Bishop et al. 2001;
J. K. Roberts, pers. comm.). Irrigation probably provides
suitable moisture for population survival and increase in areas
where summer weather patterns disrupt the development of egg
diapause (Bishop et al. 2001).
Changes in paddock rotation strategies and cropping intensity
have almost certainly inuenced pest species, although such
effects are difcult to detect and quantify. The amount of
canola grown in Australia has steadily increased over the last
2030 years (ABARE 2007). However, canola is a relatively poor
crop plant at establishment and is particularly prone to attack
by various pests including earth mites, lucerne ea and weevils
(Gu et al. 2007; Micic et al. 2008). The increases found in these
and other pests (see Fig. 3) could, in part, reect the increase in
canola sown in Australia. In contrast, pasture is now less often
used in rotations and this factor as well as rainfall changes may
have contributed to a reduction in armyworm pest reports as
discussed above.
Changes in weed management in Australia have probably
had direct and large impacts on the abundance of invertebrate
pests and particularly aphids in grains. Widespread resistance
to multiple chemicals has developed in various pest aphid
species (Edwards et al. 2008) and increasing temperatures
over the last 2030 years have resulted in quicker aphid
generation times and larger population sizes (Satar et al. 2005;
Nourbakhsh et al. 2006; Salman 2006; Iversen and Harding
2007). Despite this, the relative number of recorded pest
outbreaks due to aphids has remained relatively constant
across south-eastern Australia and has decreased in Western
Australia. Aphids survive the summer in low numbers on
perennial grasses, summer weeds, or volunteer crops that may
appear after periodic rain events (Edwards et al. 2008). They then
move into winter crops, and the timing of aphid ights is
correlated with the occurrence and extent of rainfall events
during the late summer and early autumn (Thackray et al.
2005). The development of new herbicide chemistries, the use
of crop rotations and the introduction of integrated weed
management programs in Australia have resulted in better
control of summer weeds (Turner 2004). This has likely
impacted on the survival of aphids and other invertebrate pests
that use weeds as refugees over summer.
Other improvements in management practices have
probably inuenced the relative importance of some pest
species. The fall in the relative importance of aphids in
Western Australia may, at least partly, reect improvements in
aphid management strategies. In particular, tools developed
by the Western Australian Department of Agriculture and
Food allow risk assessments of aphid-transmitted viruses to
Changing status of invertebrate pests of grains Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1487
be made in the lead up to the cropping season, improving
control decisions for aphids (http://www.agric.wa.gov.
au/content/PW/PH/DIS/PLANT_DISEASE_FORECAST.htm,
veried 5 October 2008).
GM crop plants and their potential impacts
The introduction of GM plants not only has the potential to
transform agriculture, but also the inuence of invertebrate pests
found in different systems. Since the development of commercial
GM crop plants in the early 1990s, the total area annually
planted to GM crops worldwide has increased to over
100 million ha (Dill et al. 2008). In 2007, this included over
2 million ha of herbicide tolerant GM crops, 20 million ha of
insecticide transgene GM crops and 22 million ha of stacked
(combined herbicide and insecticide) crops (James 2007).
Plantings of GM crops are growing annually by an average of
12% worldwide, with the adoption of stacked GM crops
increasing at the staggering rate of 66% in 2007 (James 2007).
The moratorium on GM food crops in Australia has recently been
lifted in several States and the rst GM herbicide tolerant food
crops [e.g. Roundup Ready canola (Monsanto)] were planted
in 2008.
GM crops will represent one of the most signicant changes in
the Australian grains industry over the next decade and lead to
substantial changes in farm management practices, particularly
around how invertebrate pests are managed. There are numerous
crop varieties worldwide that now incorporate Bacillus
thuriengensis (Bt) transgenes that target lepidopteran pests
(Tabashnik et al. 2008). Other modications for insect
resistance, such as proteinase inhibitors and lectins which are
typically not species-specic, are currently being developed.
The number of insecticide sprays is generally reduced in Bt
GM crops compared with conventional crops (Knox et al.
2006; Sisterson et al. 2007). In Australia, the introduction of
Bt cotton (Ingard and Bollgard II) led to large reductions in
insecticide applications throughout a growing season and
reduced the environmental impact of growing cotton (Knox
et al. 2006). Incorporating insecticidal transgenes into grain
crops in Australia should also reduce the number of sprays and
reliance on broad-spectrum insecticides, and potentially
reduce negative effects of chemical applications on non-target
organisms.
One of the major concerns of insecticidal transgenic crop
plants is the development of resistance in target pest
populations. The selection pressure that these crops exert on
pest populations is considerably higher than for conventional
insecticide sprays (Bates et al. 2005), and laboratory selection
experiments predict that resistance to single Bt toxins can occur
relatively quickly (Tabashnik et al. 2005). Yet, in over 10 years of
eld selection, there is only one lepidopteran pest that has
developed eld resistance (Helicoverpa zea)toaBt toxin
(Cry1Ac) in cotton and control failures for this pest are still
extremely rare (Tabashnik et al. 2008). Insect resistance
management strategies, based on the refuge strategy, are
likely to be responsible for the delay in eld resistance
(Tabashnik et al. 2005), and should form an integral part of
management strategies for insecticide GM crops in the Australian
grains industry.
Questions have been raised over the effects insecticidal (and
herbicidal) transgenes in crops have on non-target organisms
(Wolfenbarger and Phifer 2000). Research has shown that while
non-target organisms can be exposed to transgene-derived
proteins such as Bt toxins, there are generally no adverse
effects associated with these proteins (OCallaghan et al.
2005). This, however, may not always be the case, and any
new insecticidal transgene incorporated into crop plants
must be thoroughly tested on a range of organisms and
ecosystems. For instance, eld peas resistant to pea weevil
have been developed and tested under glasshouse conditions.
These peas contain an a-amylase inhibitor, a seed protein toxic
to weevil larvae, which is present in the seeds of some
legumes such as beans. Transgenic peas that express the gene
producing this inhibitor are protected in that there is high
mortality and delayed development of the pea weevil
(De Sousa-Majer et al. 2007). However, transgenic expression
of the a-amylase inhibitor isolated from beans in eld peas
can lead to inammation in mice and other animals that feed
on the peas (Prescott et al. 2005). This inammation occurs
because the inhibitor that is naturally present in beans is
modied in peas.
After the initial trials in 2008 in Victoria and New South
Wales, the area in Australia planted to Roundup Ready canola is
predicted to increase greatly over the ensuing years. Research
from overseas indicates that the adoption of herbicide
resistant transgenic crops will result in large reductions in the
application of herbicides (Phipps and Park 2002). This will
change the spectrum of plants available to pest herbivores and
alter invertebrate pest pressures, particularly at establishment
where pest abundance is often increased in the presence of
weeds (Gu et al. 2007). The introduction of stacked GM crops
(herbicide and insecticide) may provide combined control
of invertebrate pests and weeds, but stacked crops are
unlikely to be available in the foreseeable future for pests in
Australian grains. It is more likely that other strategies may
need to be used in the interim in conjunction with Roundup
Ready canola.
Other developments towards future integrated
pest management
In addition to the incorporation of insecticidal transgenes into
crop plants, future developments in integrated pest management
(IPM) within the grains industry are likely to involve the adoption
of selective chemicals, the recognition and management of
shelterbelts and other landscape-level changes as tools for
assisting pest control, and the development of new ways for
fostering invertebrate biodiversity on farms.
Recently, there has been a push to develop improved
methods of controlling pest species, including the use of
selective softchemicals over conventional broad-spectrum
pesticides. Broad-spectrum pesticides have negative impacts
on a variety of soil biota (Radcliffe 2002; Hopper 2003;
Panda and Sahu 2004) and in many situations are often
applied in an ad hoc fashion. Chemicals have either direct
(e.g. toxic) or indirect (e.g. depletion of natural enemies and
benecial invertebrates) effects, and these issues are never
completely addressed during the registration of pesticides
1488 Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture A. A. Hoffmann et al.
(Alassiuty and Khalil 1995; Martikainen et al. 1998; Van Zwieten
2004).
In horticulture and viticulture in particular, selective
chemicals and biological control are used as part of a
formulated IPM strategy (Smith and Papacek 1991; James and
Whitney 1993; Radcliffe 2002; Thomson and Hoffmann 2007).
However, the switch from broad-spectrum pesticides to selective
pesticides is limited by the current scarcity of economically-
viable options available within the Australian grains industry.
This is primarily due to the lower prot margins in the grains
industry, which delays the release of selective chemicals for
broadacre settings.
Nevertheless, selective chemicals have played a role in the
implementation of IPM strategies by Australian cotton growers.
While the cotton IPM strategies are primarily based around
transgenic Bt cotton varieties, selective chemicals are
applied to conserve and enhance benecial insect activity
(Wilson et al. 2004). This has resulted in a reduction of up to
80% in pesticide use by the cotton industry (Knox et al. 2006).
Furthermore, in the last decade some softer chemical options
have become available in the grains industry. These include a
select few foliar sprays, such as Bt, which target several
lepidopteran pests, and pirimicarb, which is a specialised
aphicide (Overton 1996). New insecticide seed dressings have
also become widely available in recent times, which offer a more
targeted and environmentally preferred option than broad-
spectrum chemicals. Although generally more expensive, seed
dressings provide chemical protection at the plantinsect
interface and have little or no direct effect on many natural
enemies (Albajes et al. 2003).
The utilisation of landscape features to promote pest control
has rarely been considered in broadacre agriculture within
Australia. Apart from recent work showing positive effects of
shelterbelts on earth mite control (Tsitsilas et al. 2006) and
remnant grass verges on slug control (Nash et al. 2007; Nash
2008), there is almost no recognition of the value of landscape
features for pest control. This stands in stark contrast to the
situation overseas and particularly in Europe, where numerous
studies have demonstrated the value of vegetation in harbouring
benecial organisms. Adjacent vegetation inuences the
diversity of benecial insects in agricultural ecosystems
including natural enemies like beetles, spiders, parasitoids and
predatory mites and ies (Symondson 2002; Schmidt et al. 2004;
Thorbek and Bilde 2004; Thies et al. 2005; Olson and Wackers
2007). These increases in natural enemies can provide benets
in terms of pest control, although the relationship between
natural enemies and pests is not always clear (Gurr et al. 2000;
Olson and Wackers 2007) and needs to be considered on a case-
by-case basis to develop useful recommendations. Nevertheless,
pest control through natural enemies present in agricultural
ecosystems is usually most effective when there is a complex
of benecial species (Rosenheim 1998; Symondson 2002).
Careful manipulation of vegetation adjacent to farms (Collins
et al. 2003) might help promote benecial species by providing
nectar sources, shelter and alternate hosts to allow these species to
persist. In Victoria, there is already a push to revegetate some
farming areas in a mosaic for developing areas where biodiversity
might be maintained under climate change and for carbon capture
(Victorian Government 2008). Ecological services on farms
including pest control could benet if such efforts recognise
the potential of properly maintained vegetation to harbour
benecial species.
Control of pests through endemic and introduced natural
enemies may become increasingly important in the future, as
the input costs of fertilisers, fuel, and pesticides start to rise due to
nite resources. This makes it increasingly important to
maintain an agricultural environment where benecial
invertebrates provide vital ecosystem services, such as
pollination, pest control, organic decomposition and the
maintenance of soil structure. Stubble retention, decreased use
of broad-spectrum pesticides, landscape changes and a reduction
in tillage can all help provide an environment where invertebrate
biodiversity remains high and services provided through
invertebrates are maximised. Practical guidelines are now
available to assist growers in identifying and promoting the
maintenance of diverse populations of invertebrates (Horne
and Page 2008). Yet there has been very little research on the
impact and maintenance of benecial invertebrates and
answers to key questions are unavailable at this time. For
example, what predators and parasitoids are the most
effective in controlling particular pests? How can useful
invertebrate biodiversity on farms be measured easily? Can
these measures be linked to production and economic returns?
What practices and landscape changes promote benecial
biodiversity?
Conclusions
The distribution of pest outbreaks in the grains industry has
shifted markedly in the past few decades. Patterns of pesticide
use, climate change, farm management responses, changing
cropping patterns and environmental concerns are all likely to
have contributed to these shifts. In the future, even more
signicant changes in the distribution and status of some pests
are likely as conditions become drier, migration patterns of
invertebrate pests change, and complexes of pests and
benecial species that provide endemic control respond
differently to climate change. The introduction of GM crops
will also potentially change the distribution of pests in grains.
While grain prices are increasing along with food prices,
production costs are also rising rapidly and there are external
pressures to maintain more biodiverse agricultural ecosystems.
These factors represent challenges but also opportunities to
promote more sustainable ways of controlling pests through
the careful use of chemicals and the promotion of invertebrate
communities that provide effective pest control and other
services. Pest species and key benecial species need to be
monitored effectively so that changes in pest status can be
identied and eventually used in a predictive framework.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Peter Ridland for providing access to pest bulletins fromthe
Victorian Department of Primary Industries, Garry McDonald for discussions
and two anonymous reviewers for comments. Thanks to Paul Mitrovksi,
Emily Thomson and Dusty Severtson for technical assistance. Our research on
pest and benecial species in broadacre agriculture is supported by the Grains
Research and Development Corporation including the National Invertebrate
Changing status of invertebrate pests of grains Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1489
Pest Initiative, while Ary A. Hoffmann is supported by a Federation
Fellowship from the Australian Research Council.
References
ABARE (2007) Australian commodities. September quarter 07.3.
(The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics:
Canberra)
Alassiuty AIM, Khalil MA (1995) The inuence of insecticide pheromone
substitution on the abundance and distributional pattern of soil oribatid
mites. Experimental & Applied Acarology 19, 399410. doi: 10.1007/
BF00145157
Albajes R, Lopez C, Pons X (2003) Predatory fauna in cornelds and response
to imidacloprid seed treatment. Journal of Economic Entomology 96,
18051813.
Andersen A (1999) Plant protection in spring cereal production with reduced
tillage. II. Pests and benecial insects. Crop Protection (Guildford,
Surrey) 18, 651657. doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(99)00071-X
Andersen A (2003) Long-term experiments with reduced tillage in
spring cereals. II. Effects on pests and benecial insects. Crop
Protection (Guildford, Surrey) 22, 147152. doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194
(02)00133-3
Anwar MR, OLeary G, McNeil D, Hossain H, Nelson R (2007) Climate
change impact on rainfed wheat in south-eastern Australia. Field Crops
Research 104, 139147. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.03.020
Arthur AL, Hoffmann AA, Umina PA, Weeks AR (2008) Emerging pest
mites of grains (Balaustium medicagoense and Bryobia sp.) show high
levels of tolerance to currently registered pesticides. Australian Journal
of Experimental Agriculture 48, 11261132. doi: 10.1071/EA07181
Baker GH (2002) Helicidae and Hygromidae as pests in cereal crops and
pastures in southern Australia. In Molluscs as crop pests. (Ed. GM
Barker) pp. 193215. (CABI Publishing: Oxford)
Bates S, Zhao J, Roush R, Shelton A (2005) Insect resistance management in
GM crops: past, present and future. Nature Biotechnology 23,5762.
doi: 10.1038/nbt1056
Beaulieu F, Weeks AR (2007) Free-living mesostigmatic mites in
Australia: their roles in biological control and bioindication. Australian
Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 460478. doi: 10.1071/
EA05341
Bishop AL, Harris AM, McKenzie HJ (2001) Distribution and ecology of the
lucerne ea, Sminthurus viridis (L.) (Collembola: Sminthuridae), in
irrigated lucerne in the Hunter dairying region of New South Wales.
Australian Journal of Entomology 40,4955. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-
6055.2001.00202.x
BRSA (2001) Land use change, productivity and diversication.(Bureau of
Rural Science Australia: Kingston, ACT)
Busch L, Gunter V, Mentele T, Tachikawa M, Tanaka K (1994) Socializing
nature: technoscience and the transformation of rapeseed into canola.
Crop Science 34, 607614.
Chio YH, Bohan DA, Powers SJ, Wiltshire CW, Glen DM, Semenov MA
(2004) Modelling Deroceras reticulatum (Gastropoda) population
dynamics based on daily temperature and rainfall. Agriculture
Ecosystems & Environment 103, 519525. doi: 10.1016/j.
agee.2003.11.012
Coll M, Hughes L (2008) Effects of elevated CO
2
on an insect omnivore: a test
for nutritional effects mediated by host plants and prey. Agriculture
Ecosystems & Environment 123, 271279. doi: 10.1016/j.
agee.2007.06.003
Collins KL, Boatman ND, Wilcox A, Holland JM (2003) Effects of different
grass treatments used to create overwintering habitat for predatory
arthropods on arable farmland. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
96,5967.
Crawford-Sidebotham TJ (1970) Differential susceptibility of species of slugs
to metaldehyde/bran and to methiocarb baits. Oecologia 5, 303324.
doi: 10.1007/BF00815497
CSIRO (2007) Climate change in Australia. Technical report 2007.
Commonwealth Scientic and Industrial Research Organisation.
Available at http://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au [Veried 5
October 2008]
De Sousa-Majer MJ, Hardie DC, Turner NC, Higgins TJV (2007) Bean alpha-
amylase inhibitors in transgenic peas inhibit development of pea weevil
larvae. Journal of Economic Entomology 100, 14161422. doi: 10.1603/
0022-0493(2007)100[1416:BAIITP]2.0.CO;2
Dill G, CaJacob CA, Padgette S (2008) Glyphosate-resistant crops: adoption,
use and future considerations. Pest Management Science 64, 326331.
doi: 10.1002/ps.1501
Dufeld SJ, Steer AP (2006) The ecology of Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae) in the Riverina region of south-eastern Australia and the
implications for tactical and strategic management. Bulletin of
Entomological Research 96, 583596. doi: 10.1017/BER2006462
Edwards OR, Franzmann B, Thackray D, Micic S (2008) Insecticide
resistance and implications for future aphid management in Australian
grains and pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental
Agriculture 48, 15231530. doi: 10.1071/EA07426
Elliott M (1989) The pyrethroids: early discovery, recent advances and the
future. Pesticide Science 27, 337351. doi: 10.1002/ps.2780270403
Fitt GP, Dillon ML, Hamilton JG (1995) Spatial dynamics of Heliocoverpa
populations in Australia simulation modeling and empirical studies of
adult movement. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 13, 177192.
doi: 10.1016/0168-1699(95)00024-X
Gao F, Zhu SR, Sun YC, Du L, Parajulee M, Kang L, Ge F (2008) Interactive
effects of elevated CO
2
and cotton cultivar on tri-trophic interaction of
Gossypium hirsutum,Aphis gossyppii, and Propylaea japonica.
Environmental Entomology 37,2937. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X(2008)
37[29:IEOECA]2.0.CO;2
Glen DM (2000) The effects of cultural measures on cereal pests and their role
in integrated pest management. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 5,
2540. doi: 10.1023/A:1009609504464
Glen DM, Green D, Oakley J, Wiltshire CW, Bohan DA, Port GR (2003)
Progress in improving the prediction and integrated control of slug
damage in arable crops. In Slugs and snails: agricultural, veterinary
and environmental perspectives. (Ed. GBJ Dussart) pp. 3542. (British
Crop Protection Council: Canterbury)
Godan D (1983) Pest slugs and snails.(Springer Verlag: Berlin)
Gregg PC, Del Socorro AP, Rochester WA (2001) Field test of a model of
migration of moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in inland Australia.
Australian Journal of Entomology 40, 249256. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-
6055.2001.00228.x
Gu HN, Fitt GP, Baker GH (2007) Invertebrate pests of canola and their
management in Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Entomology 46,
231243. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2007.00594.x
Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Barbosa P (2000) Success in conservation biological
control of arthropods. In Measures of success in biological control. (Eds
GM Gurr, SD Wratten) pp. 105132. (Kluwer Academic Publishers:
Dordrecht)
Halliday RB (2001) Systematics and biology of the Australian species of
Balaustium von Heyden (Acari: Erythraeidae). Australian Journal of
Entomology 40, 326330. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6055.2001.00244.x
Hance T, van Baaren J, Vernon P, Boivin G (2007) Impact of extreme
temperatures on parasitoids in a climate change perspective. Annual
Review of Entomology 52, 107126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.
110405.091333
Hemingway J, Hawkes N, McCarroll L, Ranson H (2004) The molecular basis
of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology 34, 653665. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.018
1490 Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture A. A. Hoffmann et al.
Hoffmann AA, Porter S, Kovacs I (1997) The response of the major crop and
pasture pest, the red-legged earth mite (Halotydeus destructor)to
pesticides: dose-response curves and evidence for tolerance.
Experimental & Applied Acarology 21, 151162. doi: 10.1023/
A:1018482502080
Hoover JK, Newman JA (2004) Tritrophic interactions in the context of
climate change: a model of grasses, cereal aphids and their parasitoids.
Global Change Biology 10, 11971208.
Hopper KR (2003) United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural
Research Service research on biological control of arthropods. Pest
Management Science 59, 643653. doi: 10.1002/ps.707
Horne P, Page J (2008) Integrated pest management for crops and pastures.
(Landlinks Press: Melbourne)
Horne PA (2004) Slugs and biological control in eld crops. Grains
Research and Development Corporation, Update No. IPM00001,
Bendigo.
Huffaker C, Berryman A, Turchin P (1999) Dynamics and regulation of insect
populations. In Ecological entomology. (Eds CB Huffaker,
AP Gutierrez) pp. 269312. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York)
Iversen T, Harding S (2007) Life table parameters affecting the population
development of the woolly beech aphid, Phyllaphis fagi. Entomologia
Experimentalis et Applicata 123, 109117. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-
7458.2007.00524.x
James C (2007) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2007.
ISAAA Brief no. 37. (International Service for the Acquisition of
Agri-biotech Applications: Ithaca, NY)
James DG, Whitney J (1993) Mite populations on grapevines in south eastern
Australia implications for biological control of grapevine mites (Ararina:
Tenuipalpidae, Eriophyidae). Experimental & Applied Acarology 17,
259270. doi: 10.1007/BF02337275
James DG, OMalley K, Rayner M (1995) Effect of alphacypermethrin and
bifenthrin on the survival of ve acarine predators of Halotydeus
destructor (Acari: Penthaleidae). Experimental & Applied Acarology
19, 647654. doi: 10.1007/BF00145253
Jutsum AR, Heaney SP, Perrin BM, Wege PJ (1998) Pesticide
resistance: assessment of risk and the development and
implementation of effective management strategies. Pesticide Science
54, 435446. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199812)54 : 4<435::AID-
PS844>3.0.CO;2-K
Kearney M, Porter WP (2004) Mapping the fundamental niche:
physiology, climate, and the distribution of a nocturnal lizard. Ecology
85, 31193131. doi: 10.1890/03-0820
Knox OGG, Constable GA, Pyke B, Gupta V (2006) Environmental impact of
conventional and Bt insecticidal cotton expressing one and two Cry genes
in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 501509.
doi: 10.1071/AR05366
Lenard E, Baker G, Hopkins D (2003) Bash em, burn em, bait
em. Integrated snail management in crops and pastures.(SARDI:
Adelaide)
Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate crop yield relationships and
the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters 2,
014002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002
Maelzer D, Zalucki MP, Laughlin R (1996) Analysis and interpretation
of long-term light trap data for Helicoverpa punctigera
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia: population changes and
forecasting pest pressure. Bulletin of Entomological Research 86,
547557.
Mangano GP, Severtson D (2008) A review of pest and diseases occurrences
for 2007. In Agribusiness crop updates proceedings 2008, Perth, Western
Australia. pp. 113119.
Martikainen E, Haimi J, Ahtiainen J (1998) Effects of dimethoate and
benomyl on soil organisms and soil processes a microcosm
study. Applied Soil Ecology 9, 381387. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393
(98)00093-6
McDonald G, New TR, Farrow RA (1995) Geographical and temporal
distribution of the common armyworm, Mythimna convecta
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in eastern Australia: larval habitats and
outbreaks. Australian Journal of Zoology 43, 601629. doi: 10.1071/
ZO9950601
Michael PJ, Grimm M, Hyder MW, Doyle PT, Mangano GP (1997) Effects of
pasture pest damage and grazing management on efciency of animal
production. Meat Research Corporation Report.
Micic S, Strickland G, Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA, Nash M, Henry K,
Bellati J, Umina P (2008) Pests of establishing crops in southern
Australia: a review of their biology and management options.
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 15601573.
doi: 10.1071/EA08153
Moens R, Glen DM (2002) Gastropod pests on oilseed rape. In Molluscs as
crop pests. (Ed. GM Barker) pp. 425440. (CABI Publishing: Oxford)
Moore CB, Moore JH (2007) HerbiGuide the pesticide expert on a disk.
(Moore Enterprises: Albany, WA)
Morton N, Collins MD (1989) Managing the pyrethroid revolution in cotton.
In Pest management in cotton. (Eds MB Green, D de Lyon) pp. 153165.
(Ellis Horwood: Chichester, UK)
Nash MA (2008) Fortuitous biological control as a sustainable provider of pest
control. PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne.
Nash MA, Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA (2007) Slug control in canola:
monitoring, molluscicidal baits and economic thresholds. Pest
Management Science 63, 851859. doi: 10.1002/ps.1411
Norton R, Kirkegaard J, Angus J, Potter T (1999) Canola in rotations. In 10th
international rapeseed congress. Canola in Australia: the rst thirty years.
(Eds P Salisbury, T Potter, G McDonald, A Green) pp. 2328. (The
Regional Institute Ltd: Canberra)
Nourbakhsh SH, Soleyman-Nejadian E, Mossadegh MS, Rezvani A (2006)
Effect of temperature on the biology of almond green aphid Brachycaudus
amygdalinus under laboratory conditions. Applied Entomology and
Phytopathology 73,13.
OCallaghan M, Glare TR, Burgess EPJ, Malone LA (2005) Effects of plants
genetically modied for insect resistance on nontarget organisms. Annual
Review of Entomology 50, 271292. doi: 10.1146/annurev.
ento.50.071803.130352
Olson DM, Wackers FL (2007) Management of eld margins to maximize
multiple ecological services. Journal of Applied Ecology 44,1321.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01241.x
Overton JE (1996) Ecologically-based pest management new solutions for a
new century.(National Academy Press: Washington, DC)
Panda S, Sahu SK (2004) Recovery of acetylcholine esterase activity of
Drawida willsi (Oligochaeta) following application of three pesticides to
soil. Chemosphere 55, 283290. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.
10.052
Perry RA, Sandford S, Hutchinson J (1977) The evaluation and
exploitation of semi-arid land: Australian experience [and discussion].
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.
Series B, Biological Sciences 278, 493505. doi: 10.1098/rstb.
1977.0057
Phipps RH, Park JR (2002) Environmental benets of
genetically modied crops: global and European perspectives on their
ability to reduce pesticide use. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 11,
118.
Pimentel D, McLaughlin L, Zepp A, Lakitan B, Kraus T, et al. (1991)
Environmental and economic impacts of reducing US pesticide use.
In Handbook of pest management in agriculture. (Ed. D Pimentel)
pp. 679718. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
Prescott VE, Campbell PM, Moore A, Mattes J, Rothenberg ME,
Foster PS, Higgins TJV, Hogan SP (2005) Transgenic expression
of bean alpha-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure
and immunogenicity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
53, 90239030. doi: 10.1021/jf050594v
Changing status of invertebrate pests of grains Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1491
Radcliffe RC (2002) Pesticide use in Australia.(Australian Academy of
Technological Sciences and Engineering: Melbourne)
Readshaw JL (1975) Biological control of orchard mites in Australia with an
insecticide resistant predator. Journal of the Australian Institute of
Agricultural Science 41, 213214.
Roberts JMK, Umina PA, Hoffmann AA, Weeks AR (2008) The
susceptibility and tolerance of the lucerne ea, Sminthurus viridis,to
currently registered pesticides in Australia. Australian Journal of
Entomology, in press.
Robertson LN (1993) Inuence of tillage practices (including no-till)
on density of soil-dwelling pests and predatory animals in
Queensland crops. In Pest control and sustainable agriculture.
(Eds SA Corey, DJ Dall, WM Milne) pp. 349352. (CSIRO
Publishing: Canberra)
Robinson MT, Hoffmann AA (2000) Additional tests on the effects of
pesticides on cryptic species of blue oat mite (Penthaleus spp.) and the
redlegged earth mite (Halotydeus destructor). Australian Journal of
Experimental Agriculture 40, 671678. doi: 10.1071/EA99160
Robinson MT, Hoffmann AA (2001) The pest status and distribution of
three cryptic blue oat mite species (Penthaleus spp.) and redlegged
earth mite (Halotydeus destructor) in south-eastern Australia.
Experimental & Applied Acarology 25, 699716. doi: 10.1023/
A:1016375219330
Rosenheim JA (1998) Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect
herbivore populations. Annual Review of Entomology 43, 421447.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.421
Salman AMA (2006) The relationship between temperature and rate
of development of the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae
(Linnaeus) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Annals of Agricultural Science
51, 271281.
Satar S, Kersting U, Uygun N (2005) Effect of temperature on development
and fecundity of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) on
cucumber. Journal of Pest Science 78, 133137. doi: 10.1007/s10340-
005-0082-9
Schmidt MH, Thies C, Tscharnkte T (2004) The landscape context of
arthropod biological control. In Ecological engineering for pest
management: advances in habitat manipulation for Arthropods.
(Eds GM Gurr, SD Wratten, MA Altieri) pp. 5564. (CSIRO
Publishing: Melbourne)
Sisterson MS, Biggs RW, Manhardt NM, Carriere Y, Dennehy TJ,
Tabashnik BE (2007) Effects of transgenic Bt cotton on insecticide use
and abundance of two generalist predators. Entomologia
Experimentalis et Applicata 124, 305311. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.
2007.00584.x
Smith D, Papacek DF (1991) Studies of the predatory mite Amblyseius
victoriensis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in citrus orchards in south east
Queensland control of Tegolophus australis and Phyllocoptruta
oleivora (Acarina: Eriophyidae), effect of pesticides, alternative host
plants and augmentative release. Experimental & Applied Acarology
12, 195217. doi: 10.1007/BF01193467
South A (1992) Terrestrial slugs: biology, ecology and control.(Chapman &
Hall: London)
Stacey DA (2003) Climate and biological control in organic crops.
International Journal of Pest Management 49, 205214. doi: 10.1080/
0967087031000085042
Stark JD, Vargas R, Banks JE (2007) Incorporating ecologically
relevant measures of pesticide effect for estimating the compatibility
of pesticides and biocontrol agents. Journal of Economic Entomology
100, 10271032. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[1027:IERMOP]
2.0.CO;2
Stinner BR, House GJ (1990) Arthropods and other invertebrates in
conservation-tillage agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 35,
299318. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.001503
Symondson WOC (2002) Molecular identication of prey in predator diets.
Molecular Ecology 11, 627641. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.
01471.x
Tabashnik BE, Biggs RW, Higginson DM, Henderson S, Unnithan DC,
Unnithan GC, Ellers-Kirk C, Sisterson MS, Dennehy TJ (2005)
Association between resistance to Bt cotton and cadherin genotype in
pink bollworm. Journal of Economic Entomology 98, 635644.
Tabashnik BE, Gassmann AJ, Crowder DW, Carriere Y (2008) Insect
resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory. Nature Biotechnology
26, 199202. doi: 10.1038/nbt1382
Thackray DJ, Ward LT, Thomas-Carroll ML, Jones RAC (2005) Role
of winter-active aphids spreading Barley yellow dwarf virus in
decreasing wheat yields in a Mediterranean-type environment.
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 10891099.
doi: 10.1071/AR05048
Thies C, Roschewitz I, Tscharntke T (2005) The landscape context of cereal
aphid-parasitoid interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society
B-Biological Sciences 272, 203210. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2902
Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA (2007) Ecologically sustainable chemical
recommendations for agicultural pest control? Journal of Economic
Entomology 100, 17411750.
Thorbek P, Bilde T (2004) Reduced numbers of generalist arthropod predators
after crop management. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 526538.
doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00913.x
Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural
sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418, 671677.
doi: 10.1038/nature01014
Tsitsilas A, Stuckey S, Hoffmann AA, Weeks AR, Thomson LJ (2006)
Shelterbelts in agricultural landscapes suppress invertebrate pests.
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 13791388.
doi: 10.1071/EA05137
Turner NC (2004) Sustainable production of crops and pastures under drought
in a Mediterranean environment. The Annals of Applied Biology 144,
139147. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00327.x
Ugalde D, Brungs A, Kaebernick M, McGregor A, Slattery B (2007)
Implications of climate change for tillage practice in Australia. Soil &
Tillage Research 97, 318330. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2007.09.018
Umina PA (2007) Pyrethroid resistance discovered in a major agricultural pest
in southern Australia: the redlegged earth mite Halotydeus destructor
(Acari: Penthaleidae). Pest Management Science 63, 11851190.
doi: 10.1002/ps.1439
Umina PA, Hoffmann AA (1999) Tolerance of cryptic species of blue oat
mites (Penthaleus spp.) and the redlegged earth mite (Halotydeus
destructor) to pesticides. Australian Journal of Experimental
Agriculture 39, 621628. doi: 10.1071/EA99028
Umina PA, Hoffmann AA (2004) Plant host associations of Penthaleus
species and Halotydeus destructor (Acari: Penthaleidae) and
implications for integrated pest management. Experimental & Applied
Acarology 33,120. doi: 10.1023/B:APPA.0000030014.00162.44
Umina PA, Hoffmann AA (2005) Competitive interactions among four pest
species of earth mites (Acari: Penthaleidae). Journal of Economic
Entomology 98, 307316.
Van Zwieten L (2004) Impacts of pesticides on soil biology in agriculture. In
Workshop on current research into soil biology in agriculture,
Tamworth. (Ed. R Lines-Kelly) pp. 7279. (NSW Department of
Agriculture: Orange)
Victorian Government (2008) Land and biodiversity at a time of
climate change.(Department of Sustainability and the Environment:
Melbourne)
Wallace MMH, Mahon JA (1971a) The distribution of Halotydeus destructor
and Penthaleus major (Acari: Eupodidae) in Australia in relation to
climate and land use. Australian Journal of Zoology 19,6576.
doi: 10.1071/ZO9710065
1492 Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture A. A. Hoffmann et al.
Wallace MMH, Mahon JA (1971b) The ecology of Sminthurus viridis
(Collembola) III. The inuence of climate and land use on its
distribution and that of an important predator Bdellodes lapidaria
(Acari: Bdellidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 19, 177188.
doi: 10.1071/ZO9710177
Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA (1999) The biology of Penthaleus species in south-
eastern Australia. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92, 179189.
doi: 10.1023/A:1003753529097
Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA (2000) Competitive interactions between two pest
species of earth mites, Halotydeus destructor and Penthaleus major
(Acarina: Penthaleidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 93,
11831191.
Wilson LJ, Mensah RK, Fitt GP (2004) Implementing integrated pest
management in Australian cotton. In Insect pest management: eld
and protected crops. (Eds AR Horowitz, I Ishaaya) pp. 97118.
(Springer: Berlin)
Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR (2000) The ecological risks and benets of
genetically engineered plants. Science 290, 20882093. doi: 10.1126/
science.290.5499.2088
Young AG, Port GR (1991) The inuence of soil moisture on the activity of
Deroceras reticulatum (Muller). The Journal of Molluscan Studies 57,
138140. doi: 10.1093/mollus/57.1.138
Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV (2006) Consequences of simultaneous elevation of
carbon dioxide and temperature for plant-herbivore interactions: a meta-
analysis. Global Change Biology 12,2741. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-
2486.2005.01086.x
Manuscript received 17 June 2008, accepted 22 August 2008
Changing status of invertebrate pests of grains Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1493
http://www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ajea
... and Balaustium medicagoense in Australia. They cited that Balaustium medicagoense that is previously introduced from South Africa is observed in the Mediterranean climate areas in southern Australia from autumn to spring, i.e., throughout the winter growing periods (Halliday, 2001;Hoffmann et al., 2008). This Pest is unusual due to its feeding behavior; in better words, it is regarded as a crop pest (Micic et al., 2008) and identified as a beneficial predator (James, 1995;James et al., 1995;Halliday & Paull, 2004). ...
... Another study also showed that the Australian grains industry, due to climate change and evolving management practices, deals with emerging pests . Interestingly, based on Hoffmann et al. (2008) from the mid-1990s, in western Australia, vegetable weevils, aphids, and armyworms are observed while the population of Balaustium mites, snails, red-legged earth mites, blue oat mites, pasture cockchafer, and lucerne flea are developed. On the other hand, eastern Australia faced with the development of Balaustium mites, Bryobia mites, lucerne flea, and blue oat mites and reduced armyworms and pea weevils from the early 1980s to 2006-07. ...
Chapter
Changes in world climate caused by human activities, especially fossil fuel combustion, are gradually increasing, and its intensity is expanding day by day. Since the climatic factors such as temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, precipitations, carbon dioxide level, etc. have significant impacts on different organisms, climate change can lead to various challenges for organisms such as pests. More specifically, climate change is a multifaceted challenge that can affect Pest’s dynamics and behavior. Besides, climate change consequences can lead to changes in the abundance and geographic distribution of different pests. These changes are responsible for the emergence of emerging pests that are commonly thought to be related to the global trade in agricultural products. For various reasons, such as the lack of a natural enemy, it is impossible to control emerging pests by biological methods, while many pests are resistant to pesticides. Due to this fact, awareness of climate change’s effects on emerging pests’ emergence is now essential. This chapter reviews climate change and its impacts on pests’ behavior and the spread of emerging pests.
... Protecting field crops from damage caused by arthropod pests is essential to ensure food quality, and yield requirements are met globally (Oerke 2006). While chemical control remains the major tool to defend against crop pests, the threat of pesticide resistance and increasing focus on environmental sustainability have driven a widespread interest in reducing their use through integrated pest management (IPM) strategies (Phillips et al. 1989, Hoffmann et al. 2008. Biological control from natural enemies, such as predators and parasitoids, is central to IPM and is an important line of defense against a variety of globally important arthropod pests (Altieri 1999, Power 2010. ...
Article
Predatory mites biologically control a range of arthropod crop pests and are often central to agricultural IPM strategies globally. Conflict between chemical and biological pest control has prompted increasing interest in selective pesticides with fewer off-target impacts on beneficial invertebrates, including predatory mites. However, the range of predatory mite species included in standardized pesticide toxicity assessments does not match the diversity of naturally occurring species contributing to biocontrol, with most testing carried out on species from the family Phytoseiidae (Mesostigmata). Here, we aim to bridge this knowledge gap by investigating the impacts of 22 agricultural pesticides on the predatory snout mite, Odontoscirus lapidaria (Kramer) (Trombidiformes: Bdellidae). Using internationally standardized testing methodologies, we identified several active ingredients with minimal impact on O. lapidaria mortality, including Bacillus thuringiensis, nuclear polyhedrosis virus, flonicamid, afidopyropen, chlorantraniliprole, and cyantraniliprole, which may therefore be good candidates for IPM strategies utilizing both chemical and biological control. Comparison of our findings with previous studies on Phytoseiid mites reveals important differences in responses to a number of chemicals between predatory mite families, including the miticides diafenthiuron and abamectin, highlighting the risk of making family-level generalizations from acute toxicity assessments. We also tested the impacts of several pesticides on a second Bdellidae species (Trombidiformes: Bdellidae) and found differences in the response to chlorpyrifos compared with O. lapidaria, further highlighting the taxon-specific nature of nontarget toxicity effects.
... 4,13,19 In Australia, Bryobia mites are significant pests of winter grain crops and pastures, and their importance as pests in these agricultural commodities has increased over recent decades. [20][21][22] They are known to damage canola, wheat, oats, lucerne, clover and pulse crops, and tend to be most damaging at the establishment phase of plant development. 21,23 This is similar to other parts of the world, including South Africa, 24 India, 25 Europe [26][27][28] and North America. ...
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND Bryobia (Koch) mites belong to the economically important spider mite family, the Tetranychidae, with >130 species described worldwide. Due to taxonomic difficulties and most species being asexual, species identification relies heavily on genetic markers. Multiple putative Bryobia mite species have been identified attacking pastures and grain crops in Australia. In this study, we collected 79 field populations of Bryobia mites and combined these with 134 populations that were collected previously. We characterised taxonomic variation of mites using 28S rDNA amplicon‐based DNA metabarcoding using next‐generation sequencing approaches and direct Sanger sequencing. We then undertook species distribution modelling of the main genetic lineages and examined the chemical responses of multiple field populations. RESULTS We identified 47 unique haplotypes across all mites sampled that grouped into four distinct genetic lineages. These lineages have different distributions, with three of the four putative lineages showing different climatic envelopes, as inferred from species distribution modelling. Bryobia mite populations also showed different responses to a widely used insecticide (the organophosphate, omethoate), but not to another chemical (the pyrethroid, bifenthrin) when examined using laboratory bioassays. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that cryptic diversity is likely to complicate the formulation of management strategies for Bryobia mites. Although focussed on Australia, this study demonstrates the challenges of studying Bryobia and highlights the importance of further research into this complex group of mites across the world. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Article
Full-text available
As climate change continues to modify temperature and rainfall patterns, risks from pests and diseases may vary as shifting temperature and moisture conditions affect the life history, activity, and distribution of invertebrates and diseases. The potential consequences of changing climate on pest management strategies must be understood for control measures to adapt to new environmental conditions. The redlegged earth mite (RLEM; Halotydeus destructor [Tucker]) is a major economic pest that attacks pastures and grain crops across southern Australia and is typically controlled by pesticides. TIMERITE® is a management strategy that relies on estimating the optimal timing (the TIMERITE® date) for effective chemical control of RLEM populations in spring. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of control at the TIMERITE® date from 1990 to 2020 across southern Australia using a simulation approach that incorporates historical climatic data and field experimental data on life history, seasonal abundance, and population level pesticide responses. We demonstrate that moisture and temperature conditions affect the life history of RLEM and that changes in the past three decades have gradually diminished the efficacy of the TIMERITE® strategy. Furthermore, we show that by incorporating improved climatic data into predictions and shifting the timing of control to earlier in the year, control outcomes can be improved and are more stable across changing climates. This research emphasises the importance of accounting for dynamic environmental responses when developing and implementing pest management strategies to ensure their long-term effectiveness. Suggested modifications to estimating the TIMERITE® date will help farmers maintain RLEM control outcomes amidst increasingly variable climatic conditions.
Article
Aphids are a major pest of cropping systems throughout the world. In most cases, crop aphids are controlled with broad-spectrum insecticides; although generally very effective at preventing yield loss, this approach risks non-target damage to beneficial organisms. In the last 20 years, a number of selective insecticides have become available to control aphids while minimising harm to other arthropods. Previous studies have found that two such insecticides, flonicamid and afidopyro-pen, cause only low-level acute mortality impacts on aphid parasitoids in Australian grain crops. However, little research has examined the sub-lethal effects of these chemicals, which could induce various physiological changes that impact pest control. We hypothesised that both flonicamid and afidopyropen have negative effects that extend beyond the immediate acute mortality previously published. To test this hypothesis, we undertook a series of experiments to determine the effects of flonicamid and afidopyropen, along with the synthetic pyrethroid gamma-cyhalothrin, on aphid parasitism (mummification) rate, emergence rate of the next generation and the next generation sex ratio in three important aphid parasitoids, Aphidius colemani (Viereck), Diaeretiella rapae (M'Intosh) and Aphelinus abdominalis (Dalman). Analogous with previous research, our acute toxicity bioas-says showed that all three insecticides had low (<30%) mortality impacts. Although sub-lethal impacts could not be assessed for D. rapae due to the low level of aphid parasitism by that species, our findings showed negative impacts on fecundity in surviving A. abdominalis and A. colemani. Of particular note is the increase in International Organisation for Biological Control ratings to moderate (30%-80% mortality and/or reproductive reduction) when mortality and reduced fecundity effects were combined to determine overall fitness impacts. Gamma-cyhalothrin typically resulted in higher negative impacts on A. abdominalis and A. colemani (compared with flonicamid and afidopyropen); however, quite surprisingly , these impacts were not rated as highly toxic. Taken together, our results suggest that, even when sub-lethal impacts are considered, flonicamid and afidopyropen are useful tools for farmers targeting aphid populations while mini-mising the non-target impacts on parasitoids. We recommend semi-field and/or field trials to further assess the impacts of these insecticides on aphid parasitoid populations.
Preprint
Full-text available
As climate change continues to modify temperature and moisture patterns, risks from pests and diseases may change as shifting temperature and rainfall conditions affect the range and activity of insects and diseases. The potential consequences of changing climate on pest management strategies must be understood for control measures to adapt to new environmental conditions. The redlegged earth mite (RLEM; Halotydeus destructor [Tucker]) is a prevalent pest that attacks pastures and crops across southern Australia and is typically controlled by pesticides. TIMERITE® is a pest management strategy focused on timing chemical control of RLEM populations during a critical period of vulnerability in the mite’s lifecycle based on historical climate. In this study, we enhance the TIMERITE® strategy by incorporating dynamic management and climatic conditions. Our findings demonstrate that climate change over the past two decades have generally shifted the optimal control window to earlier in the year, with future changes predicted to further shift optimal timings. Moreover, we extend the optimal control date of TIMERITE® to an optimal control window during spring, which maintains control efficacy against RLEM above 95% of the theoretical maximum. Overall, this research emphasizes the importance of accounting for dynamic environmental responses when developing and implementing pest management strategies to ensure their long-term effectiveness. The increased robustness and flexibility of the updated TIMERITE® strategy will help farmers maintain pest control outcomes while balancing other farm management responsibilities, such as disease and weed management, ultimately leading to cost savings.
Chapter
Climate change represents one of the greatest challenges facing human society. It has great impact on agricultural production, as a whole. It significantly influences biology, ecology, occurrence, and distribution of plant pests (insects, pathogens, and weeds), pest–host plant interactions, and activity of natural enemies. Indirectly, altered climate conditions have impacted the efficacy of control measures applied within Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programmes. Some of the IPM techniques, primarily plant resistance/tolerance and biocontrol measures are highly susceptible to the fluctuations in the environment. Therefore, there is a constant need to evaluate the efficacy of IPM techniques under different and altered environmental conditions and to adapt IPM to changing climate. To address this challenge, climate‐smart pest management (CSPM) approach has been developed. It provides more focus on management of various plant pests in the context of climate change, and involves all key actors in the production chain: farmers, research institutes, advisory services, and governmental bodies.
Article
Canola crops grown across southern Australia are subject to damage from more than 40 invertebrate species. Shifts within this invertebrate pest complex have evolved due to changing management practices. The latest change is the sowing of winter canola cultivars in the proceeding spring (September–November), grazing during late summer to early winter (February–June) and then ‘locking up’ for grain harvest in December/January. Complementary to this practice is the sowing of longer-season spring cultivars in early autumn, also for grazing. Do long-growing-season crops create green bridges for insects and diseases? In the autumn of 2016, significant damage to forage canola caused by Hellula hydralis Guenée, 1854 was reported. The widespread occurrence of H. hydralis moths across south-east Australia is expected due to it migrating on southerly airflows from where it is a pest in subtropical vegetable crops. Previously, H. hydralis had been considered as an occasional pest in forage turnips grown over the summer–autumn period. However, the occurrence of multiple larval instars in winter canola for a prolonged period in late summer and early autumn of 2016 across the high-rainfall zones of south-east Australia causing substantial loss of dry matter has not been reported previously. Little is known about this native species, but international literature exists for related pest species. The likely factors and implications of the unusually high occurrence of H. hydralis in forage canola are discussed. Pest report data indicate that H. hydralis continues to cause damage, suggesting that the growing of long-season forage canola is providing another, more suitable, over-summer breeding ground in southern Australia for this native species. Long-term research on crop and non-crop hosts is necessary to understand, hence manage, H. hydralis as a pest of canola.
Article
Earwigs have been observed as an irregular pest of increasing concern to farmers growing canola and other winter grain crops in Australia over the past decade. In this study, we tested how abiotic and biotic factors influence the feeding behaviour of earwigs. Studies were conducted with two Australian native species, Labidura truncata and Nala lividipes, and the introduced European earwig, Forficula auricularia. We constructed field-based exclusion plots that prevented F. auricularia from moving in or out of a small area of canola. We monitored F. auricularia activity and the feeding damage to canola plants throughout the winter growing season. In the laboratory, we established microcosms containing crop seedlings, as well as aphids as an alternate food source, to examine the feeding behaviour of all three species. The native earwigs L. truncata and N. lividipes did not cause feeding damage to canola or wheat but were found to actively consume aphids when present. We conclude that these species are unlikely to cause significant (economic levels) of pest damage in a field environment. In the microcosm trial, F. auricularia caused considerable damage to canola seedlings and readily consumed aphids. Forficula auricularia also caused feeding damage to canola seedlings early in the winter growing season in the field trial. However, by the end of the season, F. auricularia presence was associated with increased canola biomass. Furthermore, F. auricularia did not damage canola until all nearby aphids were consumed. Together, our field and laboratory studies suggest F. auricularia can be an important predator of aphid pests in canola, indicating a dual role of this species as both a pest and a beneficial species in winter grain systems.
Chapter
Global warming and its threatening impression on global yield of agricultural and horticultural crops and food security have engrossed the scientific attraction across the continent. Insects are arthropods, with greater adaptive mechanisms for survival in diverse habitats. The climatic variations due to global warming influence the insect diversity by disturbing their ecosystem. Being poikilothermic, insects are greatly affected by the alterations in abiotic factors with heavy impact owed by elevated temperature. Insect experiences higher fecundity rate and increased life cycles with rapid growth rate causing outbreak which severely affects agricultural production due to climatic variations. Globally 40% of food production is minimized by pests, and the reforecasting pest population is essential to ensure global food security. The pest management strategies should focus on reducing crop losses induced by pests by enhancing services of ecosystem and the flexibility of crop ecosystem in the face of climate change. This review highlights the impact of climatic factors on behavior of insects and possible tactics to mitigate climate-induced changes in insects for their effective management.KeywordsClimate changeEcosystemEnvironmentGlobal warmingInsectsManagement
Article
Full-text available
Information on the effects of enriched CO2 on both the chemical composition of plants and the consequences of such changes for performance of a herbivore and its predator is an important first step in understanding the responses of plants and insects to global environmental change. We examined interactions across three trophic levels, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, an aphid herbivore, Aphis gossypii Glover, and a coccinellid predator, Propylaea japonica (Thunberg), as affected by elevated CO2 concentrations and crop cultivars. Plant carbon:nitrogen (C:N) ratios, condensed tannin, and gossypol content were significantly higher, and nitrogen content was significantly lower in plants exposed to elevated CO2 levels compared with that in plants exposed to ambient CO2. Cotton aphid survivorship significantly increased and free fatty acid content decreased with increased CO2 concentrations. No significant differences in survival and lifetime fecundity of P. japonica were observed between cultivars and CO2 concentration treatments. However, stage-specific larval durations of the lady beetle were significantly longer when fed aphids from elevated CO2 concentrations. Our results indicate that high gossypol in the cotton host plant had an antibiotic effect on A. gossypii and produced a positive effect on growth and development of P. japonica at the third trophic level. However, elevated CO2 concentrations showed a negative effect on P. japonica. We speculate that A. gossypii may become a more serious pest under an environment with elevated CO2 concentrations because of increased survivorship of aphid and longer development time of lady beetle.
Book
Integrated Pest Management for Crops and Pastures describes in straightforward language what is required for farmers to successfully implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in cropping and grazing operations. It explains the differences between conventional pesticide-based controls and IPM, and demonstrates the advantages of IPM. Effective control of pests depends on a number of approaches, not just chemical or genetic engineering. The opening chapters cover the different approaches to pest management, and the importance of identification and monitoring of pests and beneficials. Most farmers and advisors can identify major pests but would struggle to recognise a range of beneficial species. Without this information it is impossible to make appropriate decisions on which control methods to use, especially where pests are resistant to insecticides. The book goes on to deal with the control methods: biological, cultural and chemical. The biological control agents discussed include both native and introduced species that attack pests. Cultural changes that have led to an increase in the incidence or severity of pest attack are also examined. The chapter on chemical control describes the different ways chemicals can affect beneficial species, also detailing acute, sub-lethal and transient toxicities of pesticides, drawing on examples from horticulture where necessary. Finally, the authors bring all the components of integrated pest management together and show farmers how to put their IPM plan into action.
Chapter
This 19-chapter book discusses the biology (including reproduction, life history, feeding preferences and sexual behaviour) of molluscs as pests of horticultural, field and fodder crops, and outlines the development of appropriate mechanisms for the control of these pests (mainly biological, cultural and chemical). Two chapters review progress towards the development of chemical control strategies, one addressing the toxicology of chemicals, the other the deployment of molluscicides in baits. These chapters also highlight the statistical and biological procedures for screening and evaluating molluscicides which are not a component of the standard procedure of mollusc control. A series of chapters focus on specific crop situations, providing a synopsis of the current pest status of gastropod species or species groups.
Chapter
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) was born in the late 1950s out of a crisis in agriculture resulting from an overuse of synthetic pesticides. Core concepts of IPM are grounded in the principles of ecology. IPM is practiced to some degree in all agricultural crops, but synthetic pesticides remain a dominant tactic in managing pests. Perennial crops represent unique challenges and opportunities for IPM and they represent a good model for examining its principles and implementation. This article provides a historical perspective of IPM in Washington apple production and discusses continuing challenges, barriers to implementation, and current efforts to address these issues.
Chapter
The Australian cotton industry faces a number of challenges in pest management. These include damage due to a number of key pests [Helicoverpa armigera and H. punctigera, spider mites (Tetranychus urticae), aphids (Aphis gossypii) and mirids (Creontiades dilutus)],insecticide resistance in the primary pest (H. armigera) and two secondary pests (mites and aphids), escalating costs of production and environmental concerns over off-farm movement of insecticides. To address these issues, a major research effort has focused on reducing dependence on insecticides through the development and implementation of integrated pest management (IPM) systems. As with IPM systems in other cotton-producing countries and in other crops, the Australian cotton IPM system emphasises the use of a range of tools to manage pest populations, with insecticides seen as a last resort. What is unique about the approach taken in Australia is a higher emphasis placed on the role of beneficial insects in IPM, the heavy involvement of cotton growers and consultants in the development of the system, the emphasis on incorporating IPM as a component of the overall farming system, and the role of IPM groups, where neighbouring growers agree on a common set of IPM goals, communicate regularly and support one another to achieve group goals. This participatory action research approach provides a framework for ensuring the cotton industry is fully engaged with the research effort (Dent 1995), claims ownership of the research, and becomes a driver of the IPM program (Ooi 2003).
Chapter
Until recently, conservation biological control has been the least well studied area of biological control (Ehler, 1998). During the 1990s, however, several important texts dealing with conservation biological control were published (Boatman, 1994; Barbosa, 1998; Pickett and Bugg, 1998). These suggest a growing level of international research. However, unlike classical biological control, where databases such as BIOCAT (Greathead and Greathead, 1992) exist with which to analyse levels of success, and inundative biological control, where sales figures provide at least a measure of uptake, the performance of conservation biological control has received little attention. This contribution will consider the factors that are relevant in this branch of biological control and, using recently published examples, consider the extent of success that has been achieved. We shall conclude by proposing how the future success of conservation biological control attempts may be maximised.