A role for synaptic plasticity in the adolescent
development of executive function
planning, inhibition of impulsive behavior and set shifting. Synaptic pruning of excitatory contacts is the signature morphologic
event of late brain maturation during adolescence. Mounting evidence suggests that glutamate receptor-mediated synaptic
plasticity, in particular long term depression (LTD), is important for elimination of synaptic contacts in brain development. This
review examines the possibility (1) that LTD mechanisms are enhanced in the prefrontal cortex during adolescence due to
ongoing synaptic pruning in this late developing cortex and (2) that enhanced synaptic plasticity in the prefrontal cortex
represents a key molecular substrate underlying the critical period for maturation of executive function. Molecular sites of
interaction between environmental factors, such as alcohol and stress, and glutamate receptor mediated plasticity are
considered. The accentuated negative impact of these factors during adolescence may be due in part to interference with LTD
mechanisms that refine prefrontal cortical circuitry and when disrupted derail normal maturation of executive function.
Diminished prefrontal cortical control over risk-taking behavior could further exacerbate negative outcomes associated with
these behaviors, as for example addiction and depression. Greater insight into the neurobiology of the adolescent brain is
needed to fully understand the molecular basis for heightened vulnerability during adolescence to the injurious effects of
substance abuse and stress.
Translational Psychiatry (2013) 3, e238; doi:10.1038/tp.2013.7; published online 5 March 2013
Adolescent development of executive function
Adolescence is rather inexactly defined as the period
beginning with the onset of puberty and ending with the
shouldering of adult responsibilities.1It is a time of increased
propensity to engage in risky behaviors that include experi-
mentation with alcohol, tobacco, drugs and sexual behavior.
Dahl1has called the adolescent brain a ‘natural tinderbox’
because gonadal hormones are actively stimulating affective
and appetitive behaviors, such as sexual drive, increased
emotional intensity, and risk taking, yet the brain systems that
regulate and moderate these emotional and appetitive urges
are not yet mature.
internally guided behavior, goal planning, and impulse control,
that form the essence of rational thinking and serve to counter
appetitive urges and check risk-taking behavior.2,3The PFC is
the last brain region to mature,4–7and therefore not surprisingly
the frontal lobe capacity for internally guided behavior, working
memory, and organizational skills do not reach full adult
functional capacity until mid to late adolescence.8–12
Crews et al.13have drawn parallels between adolescence
and early sensory critical periods, which are dependent on
plasticity of developing sensory connectivity and allow for
environmental (sensory) modulation of maturing sensory
connections. Specifically, they have suggested that in
adolescence PFC circuitry may be endowed with similar
plasticity and responsiveness to environmental factors, and
as a consequence with heightened vulnerability to the
detrimental effects of substance abuse and stress.13
This review examines the literature on adolescent develop-
ment across species and focuses on the role that glutamate-
receptor mediated plasticity may play in maturation of PFC
circuitry in adolescence. It is postulated that adolescence
represents a phase of increased activity of long term
depression (LTD) mechanisms that predispose to synaptic
elimination and further that termination of this LTD-permissive
phase marks the transition to adulthood. Finally, consideration
is given to the possibility that greater vulnerability to
substances of abuse and stress may represent an interaction
between these environmental factors and the LTD mechan-
isms of plasticity that are accentuated during adolescence.
The hypothesis put forward in this review, while speculative, is
intended to spark further research into possible molecular
mechanisms associated with adolescent development of the
PFC. Certainly synaptic plasticity has been studied much less
extensively in the PFC than in the hippocampus; nonetheless,
mounting evidence suggests that both long term potentiation
(LTP) and LTD play an important role in cognitive functioning
mediated by the PFC and perhaps when disturbed in diseases
related to malfunction of this cortex.14
Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Correspondence: Dr LD Selemon, Department of Neurobiology, PO Box 208001, New Haven, CT 06520-8001, USA. E-mail: email@example.com
Keywords: alcohol; depression; dopamine; long term depression (LTD); prefrontal cortex; substance abuse
Received 4 September 2012; revised 15 Decemeber 2012; accepted 3 January 2013
Citation: Transl Psychiatry (2013) 3, e238; doi:10.1038/tp.2013.7
& 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 2158-3188/13
Preadolescent development and sensory critical periods
The specificity and topography of brain wiring are not entirely
genetically preprogrammed but instead established via
dynamic processes occurring in the developing brain.
Adolescence represents the final epoch in a series of
developmental stages that transform the immature brain into
its adult form. In order to fully understand adolescent
development, it is important to appreciate how it differs from
earlier preadolescent maturation.
The developmental mechanisms that account for major
remodeling of connectivity occur before the onset of adoles-
cence, i.e., before postnatal day 28 (PD28) in rodents, 9
months in cats, and 3 years in non-human primates15–17and
include prominent degeneration of neurons and axons.18,19
Indeed, the immature mammalian brain is distinguished from
its adult counterpart by the presence of connections between
by overlap of terminal fields that are segregated in the adult
brain. For example, in the newborn hamsters and rats,
uncrossed retinocollicular projections, i.e. from the retina to
theipsilateral superior colliculus(SC),not onlyoccupya much
expanded territory in the SC relative to that of the adult brain
but also originate from nasal as well as temporal retinal
ganglion cells.20–22Retraction of the terminal projections is
associated with loss of these nasal, ipsilaterally-projecting
ganglion cells.22More generally, in the central nervous
system overproduction of neurons with ensuing neuronal
death is a common mechanism employed by the developing
brain to ensure that the appropriate balance of projection and
receptive neurons is attained.19,23–25
A second, pervasive form of degeneration in the developing
neurons of origin intact. For instance, in the central nervous
system, cortical callosal projections that are widespread in
kittens and young rats are constricted to the adult patterning
by retraction of callosal axons without cell loss.26–28Quanti-
magnitude of this form of degeneration as the number of
axons in the young non-human primate brain ranges from
of neurons or loss of axons, necessarily are associated with
dissolution of established synapses.32However, these early
developmental events are occurring at a time when, overall,
synapses are increasing in density.33–38The classic example
or early connectional remodeling, that of reduction of
polyneuronal input on a single muscle fiber to a single axon,
illustrates how synapticnumber mayincrease asthesurviving
single axon sprouts a much more elaborate terminal
plexus.18,39Likewise, in the central nervous system regres-
sion of inappropriate synapses is more than compensated by
growth and expansion of appropriate terminal fields.40
A wealth of evidence has established that reorganization of
connections throughout the brain is activity dependent and
therefore mediated by a Hebbian mechanism.41–45Although
normal regression of connections in the visual system can
proceed in the absence of visual input41there exists a period
of plasticity during postnatal development that permits
rewiring in response to altered sensory environments.43,46,47
It is noteworthy that critical periods for sensory plasticity occur
in the same preadolescent period in which remodeling of
Adolescence: synaptic elimination and excitatory/
The maturational event most consistently linked to the
adolescent stage of development is reduction of synaptic
density or ‘synaptic pruning.’ Quantitative analyses of
increase in synaptic density in multiple cortical areas that
peaks during the postnatal 3rd month, declines slowly (10%)
untilB2 years of age with a steeper decline (40%) occurring
the timing of peak synaptic density is staggered in different
regions, but the basic pattern of peak synaptic density in early
childhood followed by robust synapse elimination throughout
early (auditory cortex) or mid-adolescence (PFC) is in basic
agreement with non-human primate studies.4,50More recent
data have established that synapse elimination in humans
does not end in adolescence but continues at a lower rate into
early adulthood.51In addition, in human cortex the synaptic
related proteins synaptophysin and postsynaptic density
and decline through adolescence,52though it should be noted
that a recent study found increasing concentrations of
epoch.53Nonetheless, most evidence points to synaptic
pruning as the signature late maturational process associated
with adolescence. Other species have been studied less
extensively but exhibit a comparable pattern. Peak synaptic
density wasobservedbythe7thpostnatalweek inthecat.34In
rat, recent data suggest that peak spine density in the PFC is
present at PD31 with spine density decreasing thereafter until
PD 57 or PD60, i.e., early adulthood.33
Synaptic elimination in adolescence is widely thought to
account for the decline in gray matter volume detected via
longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of human
subjects. Although reduction of synaptic connectivity might be
accompanied by retraction of glial and neuronal processes,
elimination of neuronal cell bodies occurs much earlier in
development.54One of the first longitudinal MRI studies of
human subjects detected divergent developmental growth
patterns in gray and white matter volumes: white matter
volume increased linearly until approximately age 22 whereas
cortical gray matter volume in the frontal and parietal lobes
peaked just prior to adolescence (B10–12 years) and then
declined to adult volumes.5
children and adolescents, including one recent large multi-
center study, also show opposing patterns for gray and white
matter.55–57Interestingly, changing cortical volumes over this
age range are most prominent in the frontal and parietal
lobes.8,58,59Indeed, a recent study indicates that there is a
progression in which higher cortical association areas like the
PFC are last to show reduction of gray matter volume.7
The functional significance of synaptic elimination during
adolescence, though still enigmatic, probably involves adjust-
mentofthe excitatory/inhibitorybalance onindividualneurons
Cross-sectional studies of
Synaptic plasticity in adolescent development
and within networks. The main argument in support of this
hypothesis stems from the specificity of the loss: excitatory
synapses are selectively degenerated whereas inhibitory
synapses are spared.35,37Even loss of chandelier axon
boutons in the PFC, a finding thatwas originally interpreted as
loss of inhibitory synapses,60now supports the elimination of
excitatory input in light of new physiologic data.61Further-
more, recent evidence has established that D2 dopamine
receptors on interneurons undergo a profound maturational
change during adolescence.62–64Prior to adolescence, D2
stimulation elicits either no effect or only weak inhibition on
interneurons. However, in adult animals stimulation of D2
receptors is strongly excitatory and therefore results in robust
firing of interneurons and potent inhibition of their pyramidal
cell targets. As a result, inhibition gains a position of
mediated firing of interneurons as well as a relative gain in
inhibitory/excitatory synapse ratio. In the PFC, neurophysio-
logic studies have established a critical role for inhibitory
synapses in mediating information flow through local net-
gamma oscillations which are essential to cortical computation
in many areas of the cortex and to cognitive processing in the
PFC.67,68Thus, the correct balance of inhibition and excitation
seems to be critical for normative executive function, and
conversely, disturbance of this balance is thought to be a
fundamental component of psychiatric illness.69,70
Molecular mechanisms associated with synaptic
stabilization and synaptic pruning
Synapse stabilization and synapse elimination are primary
players in the maturational processes associated with
preadolescent and adolescent development. The transition
step in synapse stabilization. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors
(NMDAR) are localized very early to the postsynaptic
membrane, but transition to a more mature synapse state is
characterized by recruitment of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-
methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors (AMPAR) to the
synapse.71–74Expression of AMPARs on the postsynaptic
membrane is induced by NMDAR-mediated long term
potentiation (LTP), the same mechanism originally described
in hippocampus for learning and memory.73–76A second
NMDAR-mediated process, LTD, results when afferent
stimulation fails to activate a target neuron.76In many
respects LTP and LTD are opposite processes although they
engage distinct intracellular signaling mechanisms.77–80
Essentially stimulation of NMDARs can induce activity-
dependent strengthening of synapses via LTP or weakening
via LTD, and AMPAR insertion or removal from the
postsynaptic membrane is the conduit for this change in
synaptic strength.81,82Importantly, LTP and LTD do not just
strengthen or weaken synaptic connections (short term
plasticity) but actually trigger the addition or loss of synapses
(long term plasticity) even in the adult brain.83–92
Well beforetherole of
establishing mature synaptic connections was recognized,
Constantine-Paton et al.44postulated that activity-dependent
remodeling of connectivity in the developing brain might be
mediated by NMDARs because these receptors are perfectly
suited to detection of synchronized pre- and postsynaptic
activation. Growing evidence now supports the idea that LTP
and LTD are required for generation of whisker barrel field
maps in the primary somatosensory cortex and ocular
dominance columns in the primary visual cortex, both
involving reorganization of thalamic inputs to layer 4.49,93–96
In development, as in learning and memory, plasticity is
bidirectional, i.e., synchronized activity of afferent inputs
may trigger LTP and resulting synapse maturation and
stabilization; conversely, asynchronous activity may diminish
synaptic strength via LTD and predispose the synapse to
Recently, changes in the NMDAR have been linked to
critical periods of early developmental plasticity. NMDAR
subunit composition shifts from NR2B predominant to NR2A
prevalent forms in early development in the visual and
somatosensory cortices.98–100Moreover, the shift in NR2B
to NR2A shows a rough correspondence to critical periods for
sensory plasticity: the beginning of the critical period is
critical period is associated with a decrease in NR2B
expression.100,101Importantly, the switch is not locked to a
specific age but in fact can be delayed by sensory deprivation,
suggesting that it is controlled by activity.93,102–105In turn, the
changeover from NR2B to NR2A receptor subtypes controls
the sensitivity of these connections to stimulation by
NMDARs. For example, in the primary visual cortex of the
ferret, NR2B levels are already high at eye opening and
decline inlayer4attheendofthecritical periodforplasticityof
ocular dominance columns but remain high in layer 2/3.106
Correspondingly, physiologic studies in the cat visual cortex
have shown that cortical layer 4 neurons, but not layer 2/3
cells, exhibit reduced sensitivity of visual and spontaneous
activity to an NMDAR antagonist at the end of the critical
period.107Together these findings suggest that the switch
from NR2B to NR2A dominated receptors terminates the
ment of ocular dominance columns in the visual cortex.
NMDAR-mediated LTP and LTD may also constitute the
molecular underpinnings for adolescent synaptic pruning, albeit
with greater emphasis on LTD and synaptic elimination. How
could the same mechanism account for two very different
developmental processes? Perhaps the period of adolescence
corresponds to a widespread shift in the balance of LTP/LTD
mechanisms and a corresponding prevalence of synaptic
elimination over synaptic addition. In rat hippocampal slices,
an increased NR2A/NR2B ratio has been linked to decreased
spine motility and increased synaptic stabilization, suggesting a
role in the NMDAR subunit composition in halting synaptogen-
esis.108Furthermore, the NR2A state is less conducive to LTP.
(CaMKII), which has a well established role in LTP,109,110binds
preferentially to the NR2B subunit.110–112Accordingly, NR2B
expression on the postsynaptic membrane has been shown to
be necessary for LTP induction, while a role for NR2A in LTP is
not well established.113–115Moreover, NR2A expression is
enhanced by ligand binding to NMDARs and therefore is
activity-modulated whereas NR2B expression is not dependent
Synaptic plasticity in adolescent development
be responsible for metaplasticity of synapses, i.e., a change in
the likelihood of subsequent synaptic plasticity.117,118With age
and activity, NR2A subunits become incorporated into the
postsynaptic membrane, replacing NR2B subunits.116The
resulting increased NR2A/NR2B ratio translates into a higher
threshold for induction of LTP and conversely a state that is
more favorable for induction of LTD.118,119
The role of plasticity in the neocortex is not as well
established as in the hippocampus. However, NMDAR-
mediated LTP and LTD have been described in the visual
neocortex120and at multiple synapses in the PFC.121–123
Notably, LTD mediated through metabotropic glutamate
receptors (mGluRs) has emerged as a major alterative to
NMDAR-mediated LTD in widespread areas of the brain124–126
and therefore deserves consideration as a possible molecular
basis for synaptic pruning in the PFC. In this regard, mGluR
plasticity has been described at the thalamocortical synapse in
the somatosensory cortex,127perhaps indicating that this form
of plasticity is also present at the mediodorsal thalamic
mGluR LTD acts presynaptically to decrease transmitter
release and depress synaptic activity.127Such a mechanism
would be unlikely to result in synapse loss and spine involution
and therefore would not be a strong candidate for LTD-
facilitated synaptic pruning during adolescence. Furthermore,
mGluR LTD atpostsynapticsitesinthehippocampushas been
associated with large spines containing an abundance of
AMPAR.128Unlike the hippocampus where large mushroom
spines are in the majority, thin, filopodial spines predominate in
the PFC.129Thus, strong evidence for mGluR in plasticity
related to PFC synaptic pruning is presently lacking; none-
theless, possible involvement of mGLuR-mediated LTD in
prefrontal adolescent maturation cannot be discounted.
Many questions remain to be answered about the role of
metaplasticity in the PFC as well. As the NR2A subtype
promotes a LTD-receptive state in the synapse and LTD is
associated with synaptic elimination, it would be interesting to
know whether and when the NR2B to NR2A switch occurs in
the PFC and how it relates to the synaptic pruning that refines
connectivity associated with cognitive control of behavior. If
the LTD-receptive state is a hallmark of adolescent develop-
ment, a reasonable presumption is that there exists an
additional molecular switch that greatly curtails the LTD-
receptive state of adolescence into the much less receptive
state of adulthood. This switch, although presently unidenti-
fied, would transform the synapse into a state that is less
receptive to alterations in AMPAR expression on the
postsynaptic membrane. Given that synaptic pruning con-
tinues into early adulthood albeit at a lower level than that of
adolescence,33,51it seems likely that the transition phase is
gradual rather than abrupt resulting in a much less plastic
state by the end of the third decade in humans.
Adolescence development of cognitive function and
Executive functions governed by the PFC exhibit a prolonged
period of maturation reaching fulfillment only in late
Volumetric changes occurring during
adolescence have been correlated with improved cognitive
performance, e.g., verbal and spatial memory performance is
positively correlated with gray matter thinning in the frontal
lobes.6General intelligence has also been shown to bear a
relationship to the trajectory of frontal cortical gray matter
thinning, such that subjects with superior intelligence show a
robust early adolescent increase in gray matter volume
followed by equally robust thinning during later adoles-
cence.131However, too much cortical thinning during adoles-
cence has been associated with diseased states such as
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).132Thus,
there is an optimal level of synaptic pruning that is essential to
normal development of adult cognitive function.
One recent study addressed the role of AMPAR expression
and LTD in the development of PFC function in the mouse.
Vazdarjanova et al.133utilized a transgenic mouse that over-
expresses calcyon, a protein which mediates activity-depen-
dent AMPAR internalization, and found that calcyon over-
expression over the lifetime of the mouse resulted in marked
impairment of contextual fear extinction (CFE) and working
memory capacity, both dependent on normal PFC function.
Most relevant to this discussion, adolescence was the critical
period for production of these deficits. When over-expression
was silenced specifically during the adolescent epoch, normal
CFE function was rescued.133One possible explanation for
these findings is that AMPAR internalization and associated
functions like LTD are more sensitive to regulation during
adolescence and this regulation is turned off, or at least
greatly diminished, in the adult brain. Whether overactive LTD
during adolescence translates into altered synaptic number in
the PFC or elsewhere is currently not known. However, it is
interesting that upregulated calcyon expression has been
found in schizophrenia, a neurodevelopmental disease in
which PFC gray matter deficits are prominent.134–136
In the PFC, synaptic plasticity is highly modulated by
dopamine receptor, especially the D1 receptor.14,122,137This
is not surprising since D1 receptor stimulation has been shown
to trigger phosphorylation of AMPAR, which in turn promotes
trafficking of these receptors to the external membrane.138,139
The D1 receptor is therefore strategically positioned to effect
changes in AMPAR synaptic expression and ultimately in
synaptic strength and/or number. In the adult non-human
primate, long term sensitizing regimens of amphetamine
decrease spine density on pyramidal cells in the PFC and
have detrimental effects on working memory performance.140
Moreover, these effects seem to be due to changes at the D1
receptor because both cognitive and morphologic effects on
PFC pyramidal neurons can be reversed by long term
treatment with a D1 antagonist.141If AMPAR-mediated LTD
expression is in a state of greater sensitivity to modulation in
mechanism couldbe magnifiedduringadolescence resulting in
exaggerated consequences at the synapse. Other known
cannabinoid143receptors, might have similarly increased
potency during the adolescent period.
Adolescence vulnerability to environmental factors
Adolescence has been described as a period of accentuated
opportunity and of enhanced vulnerability.1It has long been
recognized that early onset of substance abuse is associated
Synaptic plasticity in adolescent development
to temporally correlate with the time of greatest vulnerability to
learning and memory pathways in a maladaptive fashion,149,150
but the question of why addiction is more devastating in
adolescence than in adulthood remains unanswered. Adoles-
cence is also associated with onset of mental illness, as for
example depression rates rise in adolescence especially for
females,151and the prodromal phase of psychosis, including
early onset schizophrenia, surfaces during the adolescent
window.152Despite the fact that adolescents are bigger and
stronger than younger children, mortality rates increase more
than 200% from childhood mainly due to accidents, suicide,
substance abuse, and eating disorders.1
One of the most studied environmental effects in adoles-
cence is alcohol abuse. In adults, brain toxicity has been
documented as a consequence of chronic alcohol abuse:
cortical gray matter thinning is most prominent in the PFC153
and associated with changes in neuronal and glia density in
both the orbitofrontal154and superior frontal cortices.155
Alarmingly, the detrimental effects of alcohol consumption
seem to be magnified in adolescence. Studies in human
subjects have shown that impairment of memory function is
more pronounced following even acute exposure to alcohol in
younger (ages 21–24) than in older (ages 25–29) subjects.156
In adolescent rats, ethanol administration selectively impairs
doses.157Moreover, ethanol consumption in rats that simu-
lates binge drinking results in more widespread pathology in
adolescent animals than in adults.158
The basis of the enhanced vulnerability to alcohol in
adolescence is undoubtedly complex and involves interaction
with multiple neurotransmitter systems.159With regard to
neuroplasticity, there are well documented effects of alcohol
on the glutamate system. Acutely, ethanol inhibits NMDAR
neurotransmission whereas long term exposure results in
also growing evidence to suggest that ethanol has a greater
effect on glutamate neurotransmission during adolescence
than in later life. Ethanol exposure at low doses in adolescent
rats is associated with inhibition of NMDAR-mediated EPSCs
in the CA1 region of the hippocampus while high doses are
required to inhibit EPSCs in adults.161Ethanol also blocks
LTP in CA1 neurons of the hippocampus in adolescent but not
adult rats.162Thus, even acute alcohol consumption in
adolescence could disrupt mechanisms of Hebbian plasticity,
and more chronic alcohol consumption in adolescence may
induce homeostatic upregulation of glutamate neurotransmis-
sion that could result in long term changes in synapse number
and dendritic spine morphology.160Homeostatic regulation of
synaptic activity, i.e., increases or decreases synaptic scaling
acrossthe whole population of synapses, is also thought to be
mediated by increased or decreased expression of AMPAR
receptors on the post-synaptic membrane.163This suggests a
potential site of interaction between developmental plasticity
and homeostatic plasticity since both involve trafficking of
AMPARs. Furthermore, sites of homeostatic plasticity corre-
late with lamina that exhibit plasticity during critical periods in
the visual and somatosensory cortices, suggesting a possible
mechanism for heightened vulnerability of selected circuitry
during different phases of development.163
plasticity in adolescence is primarily occurring in the neural
circuitry that mediates executive processing, then disruption
of synaptic plasticity at this time might result in enduring
deficits in control of emotion, logical thinking and inhibition of
impulsivity. In turn this lack of executive control could
exacerbate the addictive tendencies and result in more
The adolescent brain is also more responsive to stress than
the adult brain164and as a consequence may be more
vulnerable to depression.151Analogous to the manner in
which alcohol has age-specific effects that may be depend on
which regions of the brain are most plastic, a recent study has
shown that the effects of sexual abuse, presumably the stress
associated with the abuse, produces different brain pathology
at childhood and adolescent ages.165Notably, frontal gray
matter volume deficits were most pronounced in adult
subjects who experienced sexual abuse at ages 14–16.165
The neural pathways that mediate and modulate the
stressful effects on cognitive function in the PFC involve
monoamine signaling.164Given the prominence of dopamine
neurotransmission in mediating stress, the development of
dopamine innervation of the PFC during late maturation might
provide insight into the enhanced sensitivity to stress at this
age. In the non-human primate, dopamine innervation of the
middle PFC layers peaks near the onset of puberty and then
decreases rapidly to adult levels while innervation of other
layers is stable throughout the postnatal period.166D1
receptor levels also peak and decline to adult levels around
the adult D1 receptor patternis reached early donot appear to
support a role for dopamine in adolescent enhancement of
plasticity. However, in rodent prefrontal cortex, cell specificity
has been observed in the distribution of D1 receptors with
pyramidal cell neurons, but not interneurons, expressing
higher levels of D1 receptors in adolescence than in
adulthood.168These rodent data suggest that changes in D1
receptor expression might accentuate dopamine signaling in
adolescence and thereby account for greater plasticity during
is that the LTD-receptive state of adolescence is more
sensitive to modulators like dopamine and that critical
differences might be found in the mechanisms of glutamate
receptor-mediated synaptic plasticity in the adolescent brain
compared its adult counterpart.
Identifying the molecular basis for synaptic pruning in
adolescence could have wide ranging clinical ramifications.
If NMDA-mediated LTD were proved to underlie reduction of
connectivity, then the intracellular pathways associated with
LTD processes, including those that mediate AMPAR inter-
nalization, could be targeted to curtail excessive synaptic
pruning in diseases such as schizophrenia and ADHD.
Because the D1 receptor is a key modulator of synaptic
plasticity in the PFC and can even determine polarity of
plasticity, i.e. high dopamine levels can predispose prefrontal
synapses to LTD over LTP,137treatment with dopaminergic
Synaptic plasticity in adolescent development
antagonists or drugs that target intracellular dopamine
signaling might also be useful in decreasing overactive LTD
mechanisms. Along these same lines, drugs that impact the
D1 receptor or its signaling pathways could ameliorate the
impact of stress on the adolescent brain of individuals at risk
for depression. Likewise, the involvement of glutamate
receptors, including mGluRs,126in drug and alcohol addiction
raises the possibility that pharmacologic targeting of gluta-
mate signaling might have the potential to diminish the long
term consequences of substance abuse in adolescence. In
the same manner that the discovery of aberrant mGluR5
mechanisms in Fragile X syndrome has spawned new
therapeutic approaches for treating this disease,169–171
greater insight into the molecular substrates of adolescent
maturation of the prefrontal cortex might lead to similar novel
drug development for disorders and environmental exposures
linked to abnormal adolescent development.
The adolescent epoch is a time when refinement of
connectivity establishes the proper excitatory/inhibitory bal-
ance in the PFC, and it is a critical period for normal
maturation of executive functioning. Adolescence is postu-
lated to be a time when LTD-driven synaptic pruning is
occurring at a high rate in regions that govern higher cognitive
function like the PFC. Further, the transition to adulthood is
hypothesized to be marked by changes in the synapse that
make the mature neuron less sensitive to AMPAR internaliza-
tion, less likely to undergo LTD and thus less likely to undergo
retraction of synaptic contacts.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements. I thank Dr Keith Young for his pre-submission
reading of this manuscript and helpful comments.
1. Dahl RE. Adolescent brain development: A period of vulnerabilities and opportunities.
Ann NY Acad Sci 2004; 1021: 1–22.
2. Goldman-Rakic PS. Circuitry of the prefrontal cortex and the regulation of representa-
Physiological Society: Bethesda, MD 373–417, 1987.
3. Fuster JM. Frontal lobe and cognitive development. J Neurocytol 2002; 31: 373–385.
4. Huttenlocher PR, Dabholkar AS. Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human
cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol 1997; 387: 167–178.
5. Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NE, Castellanos FX, Liu H, Zijdenbos A et al. Brain
development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature
Neurosci 1999; 2: 861–863.
6. Sowell ER, Delis D, Stiles J, Jernigan TL. Improved memory functioning and frontal lobe
maturation between childhood and adolescence: A structural MRI study. J Internatl
Neuropsychol Soc 2001; 7: 312–322.
7. Gotay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis AC et al. Dynamic
mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 8174–8179.
8. Sowell ER, Trauner DA, Gamat A, Jernigan TL. Development of cortical and subcortical
Neurol 2002; 44: 4–16.
data from the CANTAB. I: Development of function over the lifespan. J Clin Exp
Neuropsychol 2003; 25: 242–254.
10. Luna B,Garver KE, Urban TA,Lazar NA, Sweeney JA. Maturation of cognitive processes
from late childhood to adulthood. Child Develop 2004; 75: 1357–1372.
11. Luciana M, Conklin HM, Hooper CJ, Yarger RS. The development of nonverbal working
memory and control processes in adolescents. Child Develop 2005; 76: 697–712.
12. Best JR, Miller PH. A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Develop
2010; 81: 1641–1660.
for addiction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007; 86: 189–199.
14. Goto Y, Yang CR, Otani S. Functional and dysfunctional synaptic plasticity in prefrontal
cortex: Roles in psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67: 199–207.
15. Spear LP. Adolescent brain development and animal models. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004;
16. Plant TM. A study of the role of the postnatal testes in determining the ontogeny of
gonadotropin secretion in the male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Endocrinol 1985;
17. Butterwick RF, McConnell M, Markwell PJ, Watson TD. Influence of age and sex on
Vet Res 2001; 62: 331–336.
18. Purves D, Lichtman JW. Elimination of synapses in the developing nervous system.
Science 1980; 210: 153–157.
19. Cowan WM, Fawcett JW, O’Leary DDM, Stanfield BB. Regressive events in
neurogenesis. Science 1984; 225: 1258–1265.
20. Land PW, Lund RD. Development of the rat’s uncrossed retinotectal pathway and its
relation to plasticity studies. Science 1979; 205: 698–700.
21. Frost DO, So K-F, Schneider GE. Postnatal development of retinal projections in Syrian
hamsters: A study using autoradiographic and anterograde degeneration techniques.
Neuroscience 1979; 4: 1649–1677.
22. Insausti R, Blackemore C, Cowan WM. Ganglion cell death during development of
ipsilateral retino-collicular projection in golden hamster. Nature 1984; 308: 362–365.
23. Williams RW, Herrup K. The control of neuron number. Ann Rev Neurosci 1988; 11:
24. WilliamsRW,RakicP.Elimination ofneuronsfromtherhesus monkey’slateralgeniculate
nucleus during development. J Comp Neurol 1988; 272: 424–436.
25. Lotto RB,AsavartikraP, Vail L,Price DJ. Target-derived neurotrophic factors regulate the
death of developing forebrain neurons after a change in their trophic requirements.
J Neurosci 2001; 21: 3904–3910.
26. Innocenti GM. Growth and reshaping of axons in the establishment of visual callosal
connections. Science 1981; 212: 824–827.
27. O’Leary DDM, Stanfield BB, Cowan WM. Evidence that the early postnatal restriction of
the cells of origin of the callosal projection is due to the elimination of axonal collaterals
rather than to the death of neurons. Develop Brain Res 1981; 1: 607–617.
28. Ivy GO, Killackey HP. Ontogenetic changes in the projections of neocortical neurons.
J Neurosci 1982; 2: 735–743.
29. Rakic P, Riley KP. Overproduction and elimination of retinal axons in the fetal rhesus
monkey. Science 1983; 219: 1441–1444.
30. LaMantia AS, Rakic P. Axon overproduction and elimination in the corpus callosum of the
developing rhesus monkey. J Neurosci 1990; 10: 2156–2175.
31. LaMantia AS,RakicP.Axonoverproductionandeliminationintheanteriorcommissureof
the developing rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 1994; 340: 328–336.
32. Campbell G, Shatz CJ. Synapses formed by identified retinogeniculate axons during
segregation of eye input. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 1847–1858.
33. Gourley SL, Olevska A, Sloan Warren M, Taylor JR, Koleske AJ. Arg kinase regulates
prefrontal dendritic spine refinement and cocaine-induced plasticity. J Neurosci 2012; 32:
34. Cragg BG. The development of synapses in the visual system of the cat. J Comp Neurol
1972; 160: 147–166.
35. Rakic P, Bourgeois J-P, Eckenhoff MF, Zecevic N, Goldman-Rakic PS. Concurrent
overproduction of synapses in diverse regions of the primate cerebral cortex. Science
1986; 232: 232–235.
36. Zecevic N, Bourgeois J-P, Rakic P. Changes in synaptic density in motor cortex ofrhesus
monkey during fetal and postnatal life. Develop Brain Res 1989; 50: 11–32.
37. Bourgeois J-P, Rakic P. Changes of synaptic density in the primary visual cortex of the
macaque monkey from fetal to adult stage. J Neurosci 1993; 13: 2801–2820.
38. Bourgeois J-P, Goldman-Rakic PS, Rakic P. Synaptogenesis in the prefrontal cortex of
rhesus monkeys. Cereb Cortex 1994; 4: 78–96.
39. Redfern PA. Neuromuscular transmission in new-born rats. J Physiol 1970; 209:
40. Sretavan D, Shatz CJ. Prenatal development of individual retinogeniculate axons during
the period of segregation. Nature 1984; 308: 845–848.
41. Changeux J-P, Danchin A. Selective stabilisation of developing synapses as a
mechanism for the specification of neuronal networks. Nature 1976; 264: 705–712.
42. Stryker MP, Harris WA. Binocular impulse blockade prevents the formation of ocular
dominance columns in cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 1986; 6: 2117–2133.
43. Shatz CJ, Stryker MP. Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat’s visual cortex and the
effects of monocular deprivation. J Physiol 1978; 281: 267–283.
44. Constantine-Paton M, Cline HT, Debski E. Patterned activity, synaptic convergence, and
theNMDA receptorindevelopingvisual pathways. AnnRevNeurosci 1990;13:129–154.
45. Shatz CJ. Impulse activity and the patterning of connections during CNS development.
Neuron 1990; 5: 745–756.
Synaptic plasticity in adolescent development
46. Hubel H, Wiesel TN, LeVay S. Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate
cortex. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond. Ser B Biol Nerv Syst 1977; 278: 377–409.
and visually deprived monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1980; 191: 1–51.
48. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral
eye closure in kittens. J Physiol 1970; 206: 419–436.
49. Foeller E, Feldman DE. Synaptic basis for developmental plasticity in somatosensory
cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004; 14: 89–95.
50. Huttenlocher PR. Synaptic density in human frontal cortex – Developmental changes and
effects of aging. Brain Res 1979; 163: 195–205.
51. Petanjek A, Judas M, Simic G, Roko Rasin M, Uylings HBM, Rakic P et al. Extraordinary
neoteny of synaptic spines in the human prefrontal cortex. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2011;
52. Glantz LA, Gilmore JH, Hamer RM, Lieberman JA, Jarskog LF. Synaptophysin and
postsynaptic density protein 95 in the human prefrontal cortex from mid-gestation into
early adulthood. Neuroscience 2007; 149: 582–591.
53. Webster MJ, Elashoff M, Weickert CS. Molecular evidence that cortical synaptic growth
predominates in the first decade of life in humans. Internat J Develop Neurosci 2011; 29:
54. Finlay BL, Slattery M. Local differences in the amount of early cell death in the neocortex
predict adult local specializations. Science 1983; 219: 1349–1351.
55. Pfefferbaum A, Mathalon DH, Sullivan EV, Rawles JM, Zipursky RB, Lim KO. A
quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in brain morphology from
infancy to late adulthood. Arch Neurol 1994; 51: 874–887.
56. Reiss AL, Abrams MT, Singer HS, Ross JL, Denckla MB. Brain development, gender and
IQ in children: A volumetric imaging study. Brain 1996; 119: 1763–1774.
57. Brain Development Cooperative Group. Total and regional brain volumes in a population-
based normative sample from 4 to 18 years: The NIH MRI study of normal brain
development. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22: 1–12.
58. Jernigan TL, Trauner DA, Hesselink JR, Tallal PA. Maturation of human cerebrum
observed in vivo during adolescence. Brain 1991; 114: 2037–2049.
59. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Holmes CJ, Batth R, Jernigan TL, Toga AW. Localizing age-
related changes in brain structure between childhood and adolescence using statistical
parametric mapping. NeuroImage 1999; 9: 587–597.
60. Anderson SA, Classey JD, Conde F, Lund JS, Lewis DA. Synchonous development of
pyramidal neuron dendritic spines and parvalbumin-immunoreactive chandelier neuron
axon terminals in layer II of monkey prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 1995; 67: 7–22.
61. Woodruff AR, Anderson SA, Yuste R. The enigmatic function of chandelier cells. Front
Neurosci 2010; 4: 201.
62. Gorelova N, Seamans JK, Yang CR. Mechanisms of dopamine activation of fast-spiking
interneurons that exert inhibition in rat prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 2002; 88:
63. Tseng KY, O’Donnell P. D2 dopamine receptors recruit a GABA component for their
attenuation of excitatory synaptic transmission in adult rat prefrontal cortex. Synapse
2007; 61: 843–850.
64. TsengKY,O’DonnellP.Dopamine modulation ofprefrontal corticalinterneurons changes
during adolescence. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17: 1235–1240.
65. Rao SG, Williams GV, Goldman-Rakic PS. Isodirectional turning of adjacent interneurons
and pyramidal cells during working memory: Evidence for microcolumnar organization in
PFC. J Neurophsyiol 1999; 81: 1903–1916.
66. Constantinidis C, Williams GV, Goldman-Rakic PS. A role for inhibition in shaping the
temporal flow of information in the prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 175–180.
67. Cho RY, Konecky RO, Carter CS. Impairments in frontal cortical g synchrony and
cognitive control in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 19878–19883.
68. Fries P. Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical
computation. Ann Rev Neurosci 2009; 32: 209–224.
69. Lewis DA, Hashimoto T,Volk DW. Corticalinhibitory neurons andschizophrenia. NatRev
Neurosci 2005; 6: 312–324.
70. O’Donnell P. Adolescent onset of cortical disinhibition in schizophrenia: Insights from
animal models. Schizophr bull 2011; 37: 484–492.
71. Wu G, Malinow R, Cline HT. Maturation of a central glutamatergic synapse. Science
1996; 274: 972–976.
72. Durand GM, Koyalchuk Y, Konnerth A. Long-term potentitation and functional synapse
induction in developing hippocampus. Nature 1996; 381: 71–75.
73. Isaac JT, Crair MC, Nicoll RA, Malenka RC. Silent synapses during development of
thalamocoritcal inputs. Neuron 1997; 18: 269–280.
74. Zhu JJ, Esteban JA, Hayashi Y, Malinow R. Postnatal synaptic potentiation: Delivery of
GluR4-contatining AMPA receptors by spontaneous activity. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3:
75. Liao D, Hessler NA, Malinow R. Activation of postsynaptically silent synapses
during pairing-induced LTP in CA1 region of hippocampal slice. Nature 1995; 375:
76. Dudek SM, Bear MF. Long-term depression in area CA1 of hippocampus and effects of
N-methy-D-aspartate receptor blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 4363–4367.
77. Barria A, Muller D, Derkach V, Griffith LC, Soderling TR. Regulatory phosphorylation of
AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaM-Kii during long term potentiation. Science 1997;
78. Leonard AS, Lim IA, Hemsworth DE, Horne MC, Hell JW. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II is associated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 1999; 96: 3239–3244.
79. Lee HK, Kameyama K, Huganir RL, Bear MF. NMDA induces long-term synaptic
depression and dephosphorylation of the GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptors in
hippocampus. Neuron 1998; 21: 1151–1162.
80. Lee HK, Barbarosie M, Kameyama K, Bear MF, Huganir RL. Regulation of distinct AMPA
receptor phosphorylation sites during bidirectional synaptic plasticity. Nature 2000; 405:
81. Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus: LTP and LTD. Cell 1994; 79:
82. Malinow R, Malenka RC. AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Ann Rev
Neurosci 2002; 25: 103–126.
83. Maletic-Savatic M, Malinow R, Svoboda K. Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1
hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity. Science 1999; 283: 1923–1927.
84. Engert F, Bonhoeffer T. Dendritic spine changes associated with hippocampal synaptic
plasticity. Nature 1999; 399: 66–70.
85. Toni N, Buchs PA, Nikonenko I, Bron CR, Muller D. LTP promotes formation of multiple
spine synapses between a single axon terminal and a dendrite. Nature 1999; 402:
86. Matsuzaki M, Honkura N, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H. Structural basis of long-term
potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature 2004; 429: 761–766.
87. Nagerl UV, Eberhorn N, Cambridge SB, Bonhoeffer T. Bidirectional activity-dependent
morphological plasticity in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 2004; 44: 759–767.
88. Zhou Q, Homma KJ, Poo MM. Shrinkage of dendritic spines associated with long-term
depression of hippocampal synapses. Neuron 2004; 44: 749–757.
89. Tominaga-Yoshino K, Kondo S, Tamotsu S, Ogura A. Repetitive activation of protein
kinase A induces slow and persistent potentiation associated with synaptogenesis in
cultured hippocampus. Neurosci Res 2002; 44: 357–367.
90. Shinoda Y, Kamikubo Y, Egashira Y, Tominaga-Yoshino K, Ogura A. Repetition of
mGluR-dependent LTD causes slowly developing persistent reduction in synaptic
strength accompanied by synaptic elimination. Brain Res 2005; 1042: 99–107.
91. Kamikubo Y, Egashira Y, Tanaka T, Shinoda Y, Tominaga-Yoshino K, Ogura A. Long-
lasting synaptic loss after repeated induction of LTD: independence to the means of LTD
induction. Eur J Neurosci 2006; 24: 1606–1616.
92. Bastrikova N, Gardner GA, Reece JM, Jeromin A, Dudek SM. Synapse elimination
accompanies functional plasticity in hippocampalneurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;
93. Crair MC, Malenka. A critical period for long-term potentiation at thalamocortical
synapses. Nature 1995; 375: 325–328.
94. Allen CB, Celikel T, Feldman DE. Long-term depression induced by sensory deprivation
during cortical map plasticity in vivo. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 291–299.
95. LuH-C, She W-C, Plas DT, Neumann PE, Janz R, Crair MC. Adenylyl chclase I regulates
AMPA receptor trafficking during mouse cortical ‘barrel’ map development. Nat Neurosci
2003; 6: 939–947.
96. Yoon B-J, Smith GB, Heynen AJ, Neve RL, Bear MF. Essential role for a long-term
97. Bear MF. Synaptic plasticity: From theory to reality. Philos Trans Biol Sci 2003; 358:
98. Kato N, Artola A, Singer W. Developmental changes in the susceptibility to long-term
potentiation of neurons in rat visual cortex slices. Develop Brain Res 1991; 60: 43–50.
99. Flint AC, Maisch Us, Weishaupt JH, Kriegstein AR, Monver H. NR2A subunit expression
shortens NMDA receptor synaptic currents in developing neocortex. J Neurosci 1997; 17:
100. Roberts EB, Romoa AS. Enhanced NR2A subunit expression and decreased NMDA
receptor decay time at the onset of ocular dominance plasticity in the ferret. J
Neurophysiol 1999; 81: 2587–2591.
101. Sheng M, Cummings J, Roldan LA, Jan YN, Jan LY. Changing subunit composition of
heteromeric NMDA receptors during development of rat cortex. Nature 1994; 368:
102. Carmignoto G, Vicini S. Activity-dependent decrease in NMDA receptor responses during
development of the visual cortex. Science 1992; 258: 1007–1011.
103. Fox K, Daw N, Sato H, Czepita D. The effect of visual experience on development of
NMDA receptor synaptic transmission in kitten visual cortex. J Neurosci 1992; 12:
104. Nase G, Weishaupt J, Stern P, Singer W, Monver H. Genetic and epigenetic regulation
of NMDA receptor expression in the rat visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11:
105. Quinlan EM, Olstein DH, Bear MF. Bidirectional, experience-dependent regulation of
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit composition in the rat visual cortex during
postnatal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 12876–12880.
106. Erisir A, Harris JL. Decline of the critical period of visual plasticity is concurrent with the
reduction of NR2B subunit ofthe synaptic NMDA receptor in layer 4. J Neurosci 2003; 23:
107. Fox K, Sato H, Daw N. The location and function of NMDA receptors in cat and kitten
visual cortex. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 2443–2454.
Synaptic plasticity in adolescent development
108. Gambrill AC, Barria A. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptogenesis and
synapse stabilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 5855–5860.
109. Barria A, Muller D, Derkach V, Griffith LC, Soderling TR. Regulatory phosphorylation of
AMPA-type glutamate receptors by CaM-KII during long-term potentiation. Science 1997;
110. Leonard AS, Lim IA, Hemworth DE, Horne MC, Hell JW. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II is associated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 1999; 96: 3239–3244.
111. Strack S, Colbran RJ. Autophosphorylation-dependent targeting of calcium/calmodulin-
dependent protein kinase II by the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. J
Biol Chem 1998; 273: 20689–20692.
binding to the C-terminal tail of NMDA receptor subunit NR2A and its modulation by
autophosphorylation. FEBS Lett 1999; 456: 394–398.
113. Barria A, Malinow R. NMDA receptor subunit composition controls synaptic plasticity by
regulating binding to CaMKII. Neuron 2005; 48: 289–301.
114. Zhao JP, Constantine-Paton M. NR2A-/- mice lack long-term potentiation but retain
NMDA receptor and L-type Ca2þ channel-dependent long-term depression in the
juvenile superior colliculus. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 13649–13654.
115. Foster KA, McLaughlin N, Edbauer D, Phillips M, Bolton A, Constantine-Paton M et al.
Distinct roles of NR2A and NR2B cytoplasmic tails in long-term potentiation. J Neurosci
2010; 30: 2676–2685.
116. Barria A, Malinow R. Subunit-specific NMDA receptor trafficking to synapses. Neuron
2002; 35: 345–353.
117. Abraham WC, Bear MF. Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends
Neurosci 1996; 19: 126–130.
118. Philpot BD, Cho KK, Bear MF. Obligatory role of NR2A for metaplasticity in visual cortex.
Neuron 2007; 53: 495–502.
119. Yashiro K, Philpot BD. Regulation of NMDA receptor subunit expression and its
implications for LTD, LTP, and metaplasticity. Neuropharmacol 2008; 55: 1081–1094.
120. Bear MF, Kirkwood A. Neocortical long-term potentiation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1993; 3:
121. Herry C, Vouimba R-M, Carcia R. Plasticity in the mediodorsal thalamo-prefrontal cortical
transmission in behaving mice. J Neurophysiol 1999; 82: 2827–2832.
122. Gurden H, Tassin JP, Jay TM. Integrity of the mesocortical dopaminergic system is
necessary for complete expression of in vivo hippocampal-prefrontal cortex long-term
potentiation. Neuroscience 1999; 94: 1019–1027.
123. Bueno-Junior LS, Lopes-Agular C, Ruggiero RN, Romcy-Pereira RN, Leite JP.
Muscarinic and nicotinic modulation of thalamo-prefrontal cortex synaptic plasticity
in vivo. PLoS One 2012; 7: e47484.
124. Bellone C, Luscher C, Mameli M. Mechanisms of synaptic depression triggered by
metabotropic glutamate receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65: 2913–2923.
125. Gladding CM, Fitzjohn SM, Molnar E. Metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated long-
term depression: Molecular mechanisms. Pharmacol Rev 2009; 61: 395–412.
126. LuscherC, HuberKM.Group
depression: Mechanisms and implications for circuitry and disease. Neuron 2010; 65:
127. Mateo Z, Porter JT. Group II metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibit glutamate release
128. Holbro N, Grunditz A, Oertner TG. Differential distribution of endoplasmic reticulcum
controls metabotropic signaling and plasticity at hippocampal synapses. Proc Nat Acad
Sci USA 2009; 106: 15055–15060.
129. Dimitriu D, Hao J, Hara Y, Kaufman J, Janssen WGM, Lou W et al. Selective changes in
thin spine density and morphology in monkey prefrontal cortex correlate with aging-
related cognitive impairment. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 7507–7515.
130. Andersen P. Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood.
Child Neuropsychol 2002; 8: 71–82.
131. Shaw P, Greenstein D, Lerch J, Clasen L, Lenroot R, Gogtay N et al. Intellectual ability
and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature 2006; 440: 676–679.
132. Shaw P, Sharp WS, Morrison M, Eckstrand K, Greenstein DK, Clasen LS et al.
Psychostimulant treatment and the developing cortex in attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166: 58–63.
133. Vazdarjanova A, Bunting K, Muthusamy N, Bergson C. Calcyon upregulation in
adolescence impairs response inhibition and working memory in adulthood. Molec
Psychiatry 2011; 16: 672–684.
134. Selemon LD. Regionally diverse cortical pathology in schizophrenia: Clues to the etiology
of the disease. Schizophr Bull 2001; 27: 349–377.
135. Koh P, Bergson C, Undie A, Goldman-Rakic PS, Lidow M. Up-regulation of the D1
dopamine receptor-interacting protein, calcyon, in patients with schizophrenia. Arch Gen
Psychiatry 2003; 60: 311–319.
136. Bai J, He F, Novikova S, Undie A, Dracheva S, Haroutunian V et al. Abnormalities in the
dopamine system in schizophrenia may lie in altered levels of dopamine-interacting
proteins. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56: 427–440.
137. Law-Tho D, Desce JM, Crepel F. Dopamine favours the emergence of long-term
depression versus potentiation in slices of rat prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Lett 1995; 188:
138. Snyder GL, Allen PB, Fienberg AA, Valle CG, Huganir RL, Nairn AC et al. Regulation of
phosphorylation of the GluR1 AMPA receptor in the neostriatum by dopamine and
psychostimulants in vivo. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 4480–4488.
139. Sun X, Zhao Y, Wolf ME. Dopamine receptor stimulation modulates AMPA
receptor synaptic insertion in prefrontal cortex neurons. J Neurosci 2005; 25:
140. Selemon LD, Begovic’ A, Goldman-Rakic PS, Castner SA. Amphetamine sensitization
alters dendritic morphology in prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons in the non-human
primate. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007; 32: 919–931.
141. Selemon LD, Begovic’ A, Williams GV, Castner SA. Reversal of neuronal and cogntivie
consequences of amphetamine sensitization following chronic treatment with a D1
antagonist. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2010; 96: 325–332.
142. Caruana DA, Warburton EC, Bashir ZI. Induction of activity-dependent LTD requires
muscarinic receptor activation in medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 2011; 31:
143. Auclair N, Otani S, Soubrie P, Crepel F. Cannabinoids modulate synaptic strength and
plasticity at glutamatergic synapses of rat prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons.
J Neurophysiol 2000; 83: 3287–3293.
144. Anthony JC, Petronis KR. Early-onset drug use and risk of later drug problems. Drug
Alcohol Depend 1995; 40: 9–15.
145. Adriani W, Spiker S, Deroche-Gamonet V, Laviola G, Le Moal M, Smit AB et al. Evidence
for enhanced neurobehavioral vulnerability to nicotine during periadolescence in rats.
J Neurosci 2003; 23: 4712–4716.
Acad Child Psychiatry 1982; 21: 4328–4347.
adulthood. New Engl J Med 1991; 325: 968–969.
148. Chambers RA, Taylor JR, Potenza MN. Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in
adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:
149. Kelley AE. Memory and addiction: Shared neural circuity and molecular mechanisms.
Neuron 2004; 44: 161–179.
150. Hyman SE. Addiction: A disease of learning and memory. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:
151. Andersen SL,Stress TeicherMH. sensitive periods and maturational events in adolescent
depression. Trends Neurosci 2008; 31: 183–191.
152. Hafner H, Maurer K, Loffler W, Riecher-Rossler A. The influence of age and sex on the
onset and early course of schizophrenia. Brit J Psychiatry 1993; 162: 80–86.
cortical gray matter and ventricular changes in alcoholic men over a 5-year interval. Arch
Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55: 905–912.
154. Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Overholser JC, Meltzer HY, Stockmeier CA, Rajkowska G. Reduced
relationship with suicide and duration of alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006;
155. Harper C, Kril J. Patterns of neuronal loss in the cerebral cortex in chronic alcoholic
patients. J Neurol Sciences 1989; 92: 81–89.
156. Acheson SK, Stein RM, Swartzwelder HS. Impairment of semantic and figural
memory by acute ethanol: Age-dependent effects. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998; 22:
157. Markwiese BJ, Acheson SK, Levin ED, Wilson WA, Swartzwelder HS. Differential effects
of ethanol on memory in adolescent and adult rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998; 22:
158. Crews FT, Braun CJ, Hoplight B, Switzer RC 3rd, Knapp DJ. Binge ethanol consumption
causes differential brain damage in young adolescent rats compared with adult rats.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000; 24: 1712–1723.
159. Fadda F, Rossetti ZL. Chronic ethanol consumption: From neuroadaptation to
neurodegeneration. Progr Neurobiol 1998; 56: 385–431.
160. Carpenter-Hyland EP, Chandler LJ. Adaptive plasticity of NMDA receptors and dendritic
spines: Implications for enhanced vulnerability of the adolescent brain to alcohol
addiction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007; 86: 200–208.
161. Swartzwelder HS, Wilson WA, Tayyeb MI. Differential sensitivity of NMDA receptor-
mediated synaptic potentialsto ethanol in immatureversus mature hippocampus. Alcohol
Clin Exp Res 1995; 19: 320–323.
162. Swartzwelder HS, Wilson WA, Tayyeb MI. Age-dependent inhibition of long-term
potentiation by ethanol in immature versus mature hippocampus. Alcohol Clin Exp Res
1995; 19: 1480–1484.
163. Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB. Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat
Rev Neurosci 2004; 5: 97–107.
164. Arnsten AFT, Shansky RM. Adolescence: Vulnerable period for stress-induced prefrontal
cortical function? Ann NY Acad Sci 2004; 1021: 143–147.
165. Andersen LS, Tomada A, Vincow ES, Valente E, Polcari A, Teicher MH. Preliminary
evidence for sensitive periods in the effect of childhood sexual abuse on regional brain
development. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008; 20: 292–301.
166. Rosenberg DR, Lewis DA. Postnatal maturation of the dopaminergic innervation of
monkey prefrontal and motor cortices: A tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemical
analysis. J Comp Neurol 1995; 358: 383–400.
Synaptic plasticity in adolescent development
167. Lidow MS, Rakic P. Scheduling of monoaminergic neurostransmitter receptor Download full-text
expression in the primate neocortex during postnatal development. Cereb Corex 1992;
168. Brenhouse HC, Sonntag KC, Andersen SL. Transient D1 dopamine receptor expression
drug cues in adolescence. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 2375–2382.
169. Bassell GJ, Warren ST. Fragile X syndrome: Loss of local mRNA regulation alters
synaptic development and function. Neuron 2008; 60: 201–214.
170. Berry-Kravis E, Sumis A, Hervey C, Nelson M, Porges SW, Weng N et al. Open-label
treatmenttrialoflithiumtotargettheunderlyingdefect infragileXsyndrome. JDev Behav
Pediatr 2008; 29: 293–302.
171. Berry-Kravis E, Hessl D, Coffey S, Hervey C, Schneider A, Yuhas J et al. A pilot open
label, single dose trial of fenobam in adults with fragile X syndrome. J Med Genet 2009;
Translational Psychiatry is an open-access journal
published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is
DerivativeWorks3.0UnportedLicense. To viewacopyof thislicense,
Synaptic plasticity in adolescent development