Effects of unconditional and conditional cash transfers on child health and development in Zimbabwe: A cluster- randomised trial

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: .
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 45.22). 02/2013; 381(9874). DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62168-0
Source: PubMed


BACKGROUND: Cash-transfer programmes can improve the wellbeing of vulnerable children, but few studies have rigorously assessed their effectiveness in sub-Saharan Africa. We investigated the effects of unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) and conditional cash transfers (CCTs) on birth registration, vaccination uptake, and school attendance in children in Zimbabwe. METHODS: We did a matched, cluster-randomised controlled trial in ten sites in Manicaland, Zimbabwe. We divided each study site into three clusters. After a baseline survey between July, and September, 2009, clusters in each site were randomly assigned to UCT, CCT, or control, by drawing of lots from a hat. Eligible households contained children younger than 18 years and satisfied at least one other criteria: head of household was younger than 18 years; household cared for at least one orphan younger than 18 years, a disabled person, or an individual who was chronically ill; or household was in poorest wealth quintile. Between January, 2010, and January, 2011, households in UCT clusters collected payments every 2 months. Households in CCT clusters could receive the same amount but were monitored for compliance with several conditions related to child wellbeing. Eligible households in all clusters, including control clusters, had access to parenting skills classes and received maize seed and fertiliser in December, 2009, and August, 2010. Households and individuals delivering the intervention were not masked, but data analysts were. The primary endpoints were proportion of children younger than 5 years with a birth certificate, proportion younger than 5 years with up-to-date vaccinations, and proportion aged 6-12 years attending school at least 80% of the time. This trial is registered with, number NCT00966849. FINDINGS: 1199 eligible households were allocated to the control group, 1525 to the UCT group, and 1319 to the CCT group. Compared with control clusters, the proportion of children aged 0-4 years with birth certificates had increased by 1·5% (95% CI -7·1 to 10·1) in the UCT group and by 16·4% (7·8-25·0) in the CCT group by the end of the intervention period. The proportions of children aged 0-4 years with complete vaccination records was 3·1% (-3·8 to 9·9) greater in the UCT group and 1·8% (-5·0 to 8·7) greater in the CCT group than in the control group. The proportions of children aged 6-12 years who attended school at least 80% of the time was 7·2% (0·8-13·7) higher in the UCT group and 7·6% (1·2-14·1) in the CCT group than in the control group. INTERPRETATION: Our results support strategies to integrate cash transfers into social welfare programming in sub-Saharan Africa, but further evidence is needed for the comparative effectiveness of UCT and CCT programmes in this region. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, the World Bank through the Partnership for Child Development, and the Programme of Support for the Zimbabwe National Action Plan for Orphans and Vulnerable Children.

Download full-text


Available from: Thomas M. Crea
  • Source
    • "Figure 4 Statistically significant findings for unconditional cash transfers Evaluations of programmes where the cash transfer was conditional on schooling included Benhassine et al. (2013) in Morocco, Macours et al. (2008) in Nicaragua, Robertson et al. (2013) in Zimbabwe, and Baird et al. (2011b) in Malawi. Mo et al. (2013) "

    Full-text · Article · Jun 2015 · Enterprise Development and Microfinance
  • Source
    • "Targeted interventions in areas with high HIV prevalence have meant that older persons in these settings may have access to resources that may offset the burdens of additional HIV/AIDS-related carework. These include unconditional and conditional cash transfer programmes, as well as government-funded social grants, intended for caregivers of orphans and vulnerable children (OVC; Ardington et al., 2010; Miller & Tsoka, 2012; Niño-Zarazúa et al., 2012; Robertson et al., 2013; Twine, Collinson, Polzer, & Kahn, 2007). A number of these programmes have shown improved nutritional and educational outcomes for OVCs in homes that receive cash assistance (Adato & Bassett, 2009; Ayuku et al., 2014; Wakoli, Ettyang, & Lakati, 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An estimated 58 million persons aged 60-plus live in sub-Saharan Africa; by 2050 that number will rise sharply to 215 million. Older Africans traditionally get care in their old age from the middle generation. But in East and Southern Africa, HIV has hollowed out that generation, leaving many older persons to provide care for their children's children without someone to care for him or herself in old age. Simultaneously, the burden of disease among older persons is changing in this region. The result is a growing care deficit. This article examines the existing literature on care for and by older persons in this region, highlighting understudied aspects of older persons' experiences of ageing and care - including the positive impacts of carework, variation in the region and the role of resilience and pensions. We advance a conceptual framework of gendered identities - for both men and women - and intergenerational social exchange to help focus and understand the complex interdependent relationships around carework, which are paramount in addressing the needs of older persons in the current care deficit in this region, and the Global South more generally.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015 · Global Public Health
    • "More generally however, cash transfer (CT) programmes, of which BI can be considered a type, have in the past two decades increasingly been used in low-and middle-income countries with promising results. A growing body of evidence highlights successes in tackling poverty (Fiszbein and Schady 2009; Barrientos and DeJong 2006; Barrientos and Lloyd-Sherlock 2003), improving outcomes of health, nutrition, child development and education (Ranganathan and Lagarde 2012; Robertson et al. 2013; Fernald, Gertler, and Neufeld 2008; Kenya CT-OVC Evaluation Team 2012; Baird, McIntosh, and Özler 2011), and stimulating local enterprise and economy (Covarrubias, Davis, and Winters 2012; Haushofer and Shapiro 2013; Yablonski and O'Donnell 2009; De Mel, McKenzie, and Woodruff 2008). It seems plausible then that BI could also lead to beneficial outcomes. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article evaluates the effects on health of a basic income (BI) pilot project in Madhya Pradesh, India, between 2011 and 2012. BI can be defined as a non-contributory, universal and unconditional cash transfer paid out on an individual basis. The project was conducted as a cluster randomised trial involving 2034 households. Three health outcomes were examined: minor illnesses and injuries, illness and injuries requiring hospitalisation, and child vaccination coverage. The data were analysed with multiple imputation, propensity score matching and weighted logistic regression. BI was seen to significantly reduce the odds of minor illnesses and injuries by 46 per cent. No effect was seen on more serious illnesses and injuries, at least not in the time scale given, nor on child vaccination coverage which was already exceptionally high. Policymakers are encouraged to consider BI as an equitable policy of social protection, though further research on its impact on health is desirable.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2015 · Journal of Development Effectiveness
Show more