Dynamic Spread of Happiness in a Large Social Network: Longitudinal Analysis Over 20 Years in the Framingham Heart Study

Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 17.45). 02/2008; 337(dec04_2):a2338. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a2338
Source: PubMed


To evaluate whether happiness can spread from person to person and whether niches of happiness form within social networks.
Longitudinal social network analysis.
Framingham Heart Study social network.
4739 individuals followed from 1983 to 2003.
Happiness measured with validated four item scale; broad array of attributes of social networks and diverse social ties.
Clusters of happy and unhappy people are visible in the network, and the relationship between people's happiness extends up to three degrees of separation (for example, to the friends of one's friends' friends). People who are surrounded by many happy people and those who are central in the network are more likely to become happy in the future. Longitudinal statistical models suggest that clusters of happiness result from the spread of happiness and not just a tendency for people to associate with similar individuals. A friend who lives within a mile (about 1.6 km) and who becomes happy increases the probability that a person is happy by 25% (95% confidence interval 1% to 57%). Similar effects are seen in coresident spouses (8%, 0.2% to 16%), siblings who live within a mile (14%, 1% to 28%), and next door neighbours (34%, 7% to 70%). Effects are not seen between coworkers. The effect decays with time and with geographical separation.
People's happiness depends on the happiness of others with whom they are connected. This provides further justification for seeing happiness, like health, as a collective phenomenon.

Download full-text


Available from: PubMed Central · License: CC BY-NC
  • Source
    • "At the same time, there has been a burgeoning interest in understanding group dynamics on a finer scale as arising from individual interactions on an underlying network structure [14]. While the spread of emotions [15], epidemics [16], and cooperation1718 on networks has received significant study in recent years and inspired a large number of game theoretical models, relatively little attention has been paid to modeling the spread of violence in networks89. Likewise, cooperative behavior in the context of multi-level games—with differentiated roles for individuals rather than a homogenous population—have generated interest, though these models have assumed well-mixed populations rather than more realistic social network structures [19] . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is significant heterogeneity within and between populations in their propensity to engage in conflict. Most research has neglected the role of within-group effects in social networks in contributing to between-group violence and focused instead on the precursors and consequences of violence, or on the role of between-group ties. Here, we explore the role of individual variation and of network structure within a population in promoting and inhibiting group violence towards other populations. Motivated by ethnographic observations of collective behavior in a small-scale society, we describe a model with differentiated roles for individuals embedded within friendship networks. Using a simple model based on voting-like dynamics, we explore several strategies for influencing group-level behavior. When we consider changing population level attitude changes and introducing control nodes separately, we find that a particularly effective control strategy relies on exploiting network degree. We also suggest refinements to our model such as tracking fine-grained information spread dynamics that can lead to further enrichment in using evolutionary game theory models for sociological phenomena.
    Full-text · Article · Feb 2016 · PLoS ONE
  • Source
    • "The spread of various mental health indicators in local social networks has been analysed, e.g., suicide (Haw et al., 2013), happiness (Fowler and Christakis, 2008), depression (Rosenquist et al., 2011), and even authism (Liu et al., 2010). Usually, this spread occurs within a short time period and in geographically close living areas. "
    Preview · Working Paper · Dec 2015
  • Source
    • "With globalization, commensal rites like modern Christmas feasts have even spread further across classes and nations, and become a universal cultural icon of the ideal family (Gillis, 1989; Pitts et al., 2007). Happiness of individuals is closely linked with happiness of others in the individual's social network (Fowler & Christakis, 2008). Therefore, a set of good social relationships, including relationships over a meal, is one of the indicators of an individual's happiness. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our research investigates the significance of frequent solo consumption of main meals and the association with a holistic wellbeing measure of happiness using data from 39820 Thai Cohort Study members who completed 8-year follow-up in 2013. This nationwide cohort has been under study since 2005 to analyse the dynamics and determinants of the health-risk transition from infectious to chronic diseases. Here we analyse data from the 2009 and 2013 follow-ups. Approximately 11% reported eating more than half of the main meals per week alone. Sociodemographic attributes associated with eating alone were being male, older age, unmarried, smaller household, lower income, and urban residence. Dissatisfaction with amount of spare time (ie 'busyness') was also linked to eating alone. In the multivariate cross-sectional model, reporting being unhappy was associated with frequent solo eating (Adjusted Odds Ratio - AOR 1.54, 95% Confidence Intervals 1.30-1.83). Stratified by age and sex groups, the effects were strongest among females (AOR 1.90 1.52-2.38). A monotonic relationship linked frequent eating alone and 4-year longitudinal unhappiness. The larger the dose of unhappiness the greater the odds of eating alone - AOR 1.29, 1.31, 1.72 after controlling for potential covariates. Having a meal is not only important for nutritional and health outcomes; it is also a vital part of daily social interaction. Our study provided empirical evidence from a non-Western setting that sharing meals could contribute to increasing happiness.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Global journal of health science
Show more