ArticlePDF Available

HERPETOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE LOWER DANUBE AREA (CALAFAT-CALARASI SECTOR)

Authors:
  • research and education

Abstract and Figures

The first information on a reptile species occurring in Romania is represented by the description of some eggs of European Pond Turtles found in the Danube valley, in the middle of the 18th century (Marsigli, 1744). If we do not take into account the Danube Delta and the Iron Gates area, in the following two centuries (XIX and XX) there were scarce scientific investigations in the sites along the Danube river. In his detailed work, Călinescu gives data on the amphibians and reptiles observed in vicinity of the Danube (Călinescu, 1931). The well-known Romanian monographies of Fuhn (1960) and Fuhn & Vancea (1961) provide details on the occurrence of most of the species living in the target area. New records are published in few articles (Cruce, 1971; Fuhn, 1964; Tatole et al., 1994). The recent overviews are mostly based on the above mentioned publications, without indication on the information sources (Cogălniceanu, 1991; Cogălniceanu et al., 2000). The present paper shows the results of current preliminary studies focused on the distribution of amphibians and reptiles in the areas close to the Danube river.
Content may be subject to copyright.
6WXGLLúL&HUFHW UL Biologie 6 115 - 119 8QLYHUVLWDWHDGLQ%DF X1RLHPEULH
HERPETOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE LOWER DANUBE AREA
&$/$)$7& / 5$ù,6(&725
Zsolt TÖRÖK
Key words: amphibians, reptiles, distribution, Danube valley, Romania
INTRODUCTION
The first information on a reptile species occurring
in Romania is represented by the description of some
eggs of European Pond Turtles found in the Danube
valley, in the middle of the 18th century (Marsigli,
1744). If we do not take into account the Danube
Delta and the Iron Gates area, in the following two
centuries (XIX and XX) there were scarce scientific
investigations in the sites along the Danube river. In
KLV GHWDLOHG ZRUN & OLQHVFX JLYHV GDWD RQ WKH
amphibians and reptiles observed in vicinity of the
'DQXEH& OLQHVFX7KHZHOONQRZQ5RPDQLDQ
monographies of Fuhn (1960) and Fuhn & Vancea
(1961) provide details on the occurrence of most of
the species living in the target area. New records are
published in few articles (Cruce, 1971; Fuhn, 1964;
Tatole et al., 1994). The recent overviews are mostly
based on the above mentioned publications, without
LQGLFDWLRQ RQ WKH LQIRUPDWLRQ VRXUFHV &RJ O QLFHDQX
&RJ OQLFHDQXHWDO
The present paper shows the results of current
preliminary studies focused on the distribution of
amphibians and reptiles in the areas close to the
Danube river.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The investigations were carried out during the year
LQWKHIROORZLQJSHULRGV $SULO 2OWHQL D
± &DODIDW VHFWRU  ±  6HSWHPEHU & O UDúL ±
Suhaia sector), 10 11 October (sector between
Giurgiu and the confluence of Vedea river with the
'DQXEH DQG  ±  2FWREHU 7XUQX 0 JXUHOH ±
Calafat sector).
During the field work we have observed the
occurrence of amphibians and reptiles in three major
types of habitats: the actual floodplain (the area
between the shore of the Danube and the dam along
the river), the former flooplain (area between the dam
and the limit of the continental land) and the areas
very close to the limit of the continental land
(including the localities).
The species were identified with the aid of the
classic keys (Fuhn, 1960; Fuhn & Vancea, 1961). The
occurrence of some species was also established on
the base of eggs, skin fragments and corps. Vernacular
names of the species are according to Arnold &
Burton (1978).
The UTM codes with 10x10 km squares were used
to indicate the location of the investigated areas
(Lehrer & Lehrer, 1990). In case of some sites we
have also mentioned the nearest locality.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The results of the investigations are presented as a
list of species, mentioning the site and data of records.
The sites are listed in alphabetic order in Table No. 1.
During the field studies we have found the
following species:
1. The Danube Crested Newt (Triturus
dobrogicusZDVUHFRUGHGDW7XUQX0 JXUHOHQHDUWKH
confluence of Sîi river with the Danube; 27 April).
2. The Smooth Newt (Triturus vulgaris) was
recorded at Gostinu (pond in the village; 26 April).
3. The Fire-bellied Toad (Bombina bombina) was
observed at Bechet (pond near the custom office; 27
April), Chirnogi (25 April), Corabia (27 April),
' EXOHQL (former duck-farm; 27 April), ' EXOHQL
(pond in the village; 27 April), 'XQ UHQL (27 April);
Gostinu (pond in the village; 26 April), 2OWHQL D (25
April), Orlea (27 April), 6 UDWD (27 April), Suhaia
(lake; 26 April), Turnu 0 JXUHOH (bridge over Sîi
river; April).
4. The Green Toad (Bufo viridis) was recorded at
Bujoru (26 Arpil), Chirnogi (25 April), ' EXOHQL
(former duck-farm; 27 April), *ROHQ L  $SULO
Gostinu (26 April), 2OWHQL D  $SULO Suhaia (26
April), Turnu 0 JXUHOH  $SULO 9LLúRDUD 
April).
5. The Common Tree Frog (Hyla arborea) was
observed at Balta Arcear (near Ciupercenii Noi; 27
October), Chiciu (near & O UDúL; 18 September),
' EXOHQL (former duck-farm; 27 April), Giurgiu (25
April), Iazurile &LRF QHúWL (19 September), Gârcov
(zootechnical farm, 25 October), Gostinu (20
September), Malu (11 October), Ostrovul Kama-Dinu
(river island; 10 October), 3LHWULúX (Danube shore; 11
October), Suhaia (lake; 21 September), Turnu
0 JXUHOH (26 April) and Vedea (Danube shore at KM
507; 11 October).
6 and 7. The frogs belonging to the Rana
“esculenta” complex (probably both the Edible Frog
Rana esculenta and the Marsh Frog - Rana
ridibunda) were recorded at balta Arcear (near
Ciupercenii Noi; 27 October), Bechet (27 April),
Bujoru (near bridge over Vedea river, 20
Table 1. Sites of the Danube river valley investigated in 2000.
Name of investigated site / sites No. of site in Fig. 1c Name of county UTM code
Balta Arcear (near Ciupercenii Noi locality) 3 Dolj FP 55
Bechet 9 Dolj GP 35
6 Dolj GP 06
Bujoru (border area and bridge over Vedea river) 22 Teleorman LJ 83
Calafat 2 Dolj FP 57
Chiciu 36 NJ 28
Chirnogi (village and agricultural polder) 30 MJ 68
18 Teleorman LJ 34
Corabia (locality and archaeological site) 14 Olt KJ 94
10 Dolj KJ 65
11 Dolj KJ 64
6 Dolj GP 06
Gârcov 15 Olt LJ 04
24 Giurgiu LJ 94
Giurgiu (near bridge toward Zimnicea & ruins) 27 Giurgiu MJ 15
1 Dolj FP 67
Gostinu 29 Giurgiu MJ 27
Gostinu (agricultural polder) 28 Giurgiu MJ 37
Gura Padinii (near border area) 13 Olt KJ 84
34 NJ 19
35 NJ 29
Islaz (locality & near Ostrovul Mic islet) 16 Teleorman LJ 14
25 Giurgiu MJ 04
33 NJ 09
Malu (near locality & border area) 26 Giurgiu MJ 05
Nedeia 8 Dolj GP 25
32 MJ 78
Orlea 13 Orlea KJ 84
Ostrovul Arcalia area (Danube shore) 4 Dolj FP 65
Ostrovul Kama-Dinu (river island) 25 Giurgiu MJ 04
5 Dolj FP 75
23 Teleorman LJ 93
24 Teleorman LJ 94
Potelu 12 Olt KJ 74
7 Dolj GP 16
10 Dolj KJ 65
Slobozia (near locality; fishpond & border area) 27 Giurgiu MJ 15
Suhaia (fishpond & border area) 19 Dolj LJ 54
17 Teleorman LJ 24
Vedea (near locality & border area) 25 Giurgiu MJ 04
Vedea river (area of confluence with the Danube) 22 Teleorman LJ 83
19 Teleorman LJ 54
8 Dolj GP 25
Zimnicea (ruinele) 21 Teleorman LJ 63
September), Chiciu (near & O UDúL, 18 September),
Chirnogi (25 April), Ciuperceni (near Turnu
0 JXUHOH, 21 September), Corabia (27 April),
' EXOHQL (pond in the locality and former duck-farm;
27 April), 'XQ UHQL (27 April), Giurgiu (25 April),
*ROHQ L (27 April), Gostinu (20 September), Iazurile
&LRF QHúWL (fishpond; 19 September), ,H]HU& O UDúL
(fishpond; 19 September), Islaz (25 October), Lake
* O XL (southern end; 19 September), 2OWHQL D (25
April), 3LHWULúX (near village; 20 September), 3LHWULúX
(Danube shore area 11 October), Potelu (27 April),
6 UDWD (27 April), Suhaia (26 April), Turnu 0 JXUHOH
(26 April), Turnu 0 JXUHOH (confluence of Sîi river
and the Danube; 27 April), 9LLúRDUD (21 September).
8. The Sand Lizard (Lacerta agilis) was recorded
DW *RVWLQX  6HSWHPEHU ,H]HU& O UDúL VKRUH RI
the pond near the industrial area; 19 September), Malu
(near Danube shore; 20 September).
9. The Green Lizard (Lacerta viridis) was
recorded at Calafat (27 April), Chirnogi (19
September), Corabia (Sucidava archaeological site, 27
$SULO' EXOHQL  $SULO *LXUJLX QHDU WKH EULGJH
toward Zimnicea; 20 September), Islaz (mainland-shore
of the Danube in the vicinity of the island Ostrovul Mic;
 2FWREHU .0  'DQXEH VKRUH QHDU &HW XLD
village; 11 October), Nedeia (27 April), Orlea (25
October), Ostrovul Arcalia area (mainland-shore of the
Danube in the vicinity of the island; 27 October),
2VWURYXO 3LHWULú DUHD PDLQODQGVKRUH RI WKH 'DQXEH LQ
the vicinity of the island, 27 October), Potelu (27 April),
6 SDWD  $SULO 6 UDWD  $SULO 6ORER]LD EXQNHU
near the fishpond and near to Danube shore; 11 October),
7XUQX 0 JXUHOH UXLQV RI D IRUWUHVV QHDU WKH 'DQXEH
VKRUH  2FWREHU = YDO  $SULO 9HGHD QHDU
'DQXEHVKRUH2FWREHU9LLúRDUD6HSWHPEHU
10. The Balkan Wall Lizard (Podarcis taurica) was
recorded at Bujoru (bridge over Vedea river, 20
6HSWHPEHU &LXSHUFHQL QHDU 7XUQX 0 JXUHOH 
6HSWHPEHU ' EXOHQL IRUPHU GXFNIDUP  2FWREHU
'XQ UHQL  $SULO * XMDQL  2FWREHU *kUFRY
(zootechnical farm; 25 October), Giurgiu (near the
bridge toward Zimnicea; 20 September), Gostinu (20
September), Gura Padinii (area near to the Danube shore;
2FWREHU.0'DQXEHVKRUHQHDU&HW XLD
117


























                                   
%8/*$5,$
%8/*$5,$
-LXULYHU
9HGHDULYHU
$UJHúULYHU
'DQXEH
/DNH
%LVWUH /DNH
6XKDLD
/DNH
* O XL
)3 *3 .- /- 0- 1-
$%%5(9,$7,216
*ROHQ L
&DODIDW
%DOWD$UFHDU&LXSHUFHQLL1RLDUHD
2VWURYXO$UFDOLDDUHD
2VWURYXO3LHWULúDUHD
%LVWUH DQG'XQ UHQL
6 SDWD
1HGHLDDQG= YDO
%HFKHW
' EXOHQLDQG6 UDWD
' EXOHQLDUHD
3RWHOXDUHD
*XUD3DGLQLLDQG2UOHD
&RUDELDDUHD
*kUFRY
,VOD]DUHD
7XUQX0 JXUHOHDUHD
&LXSHUFHQL
6XKDLD6XKDLD/DNHDQG9LLúRDUD
6XKDLDDUHD'DQXEHVKRUH
=LPQLFHDDQFLHQWUXLQV
9HGHDULYHUDQG%XMRUXYLOODJH
3LHWULúX
* XMDQLDQG 3LHWULúXDUHD'DQXEH
VKRUH
'DQXEH VKRUH .0  2VWURYXO
.DPD'LQXDQG9HGHDDUHD
0DOXDUHDLQFOXGLQJ'DQXEHVKRUH
*LXUJLX6ORER]LDDQG0DOXDUHDV
*RVWLQXDUHD
*RVWLQXYLOODJH
&KLUQRJLSROGHUDUHD
&KLUQRJLORFDOLW\
2OWHQL D

&LRF QHúWLILVKSRQG
,H]HU& O UDúLILVKSRQGDUHD
&KLFLXDUHD
*DOD XL/DNHVRXWKHUQSDUW
+81*$5<
<8*26/$9,$
02/'$9,$15(38 %/,&
8 .5$,1(
8 .5$,1(
%8 /*$5,$
%/$&.
6($
$ % & '
(
$EEUHYLDWLRQV
$'ROMFRXQW\
%2OWFRXQW\
&7HOHRUPDQFRXQW\
'*LXUJLXFRXQW\
(& O UDúLFRXQW\
)LJD*HRJUDSKLFDOSRVLWLRQ
RIWKHLQYHVWLJDWHGUHJLRQ
)LJE870VTXDUHVRI[NPRFFXUULQJLQWKHWDUJHWUHJLRQ
)LJF'LVWULEXWLRQRILQYHVWLJDWHGVLWHVLQWKHWDUJHWUHJLRQ
1
520$1,$
118
village, 11 October), Malu (area near the Danube
shore; 20 September), Malu (near the village, 11
2FWREHU 2UOHD  $SULO 2VWURYXO 3LHWULú DUHD
(mainland-shore of the Danube in the vicinity of the
island; 27 October), Potelu (27 April), Slobozia (dams
at the fishpond near to the locality, 11 October), Suhaia
(lake and area near Danube shore; 21 September),
Vedea river (area of confluence with the Danube; 11
2FWREHU9LLúRDUD6HSWHPEHUDQG=LPQLFHDUXLQV
near Danube shore; 21 September),
11. The Common Wall Lizard (Podarcis muralis)
was observed only at Giurgiu (at the ruins of fortress;
20 September)
12. The Grass Snake (Natrix natrix) was recorded
at Corabia (2000.IV.27 April), ' EXOHQL (former duck-
farm; 27 April), 6 SDWD (27 April), Iazurile &LRF QHúWL
(19 September), Bujoru (near the bridge over Vedea
river; 20 September), Suhaia (dam near the Danube
shore; 21 September), 9LLúRDUD (21 September),
3LHWULúX (dam near the Danube shore; 11 October),
Vedea river (area of confluence with the Danube; 11
October), Balta Arcear (pond near Ciupercenii Noi; 27
October), %LVWUH (lake, 27 October).
The areas placed between the dam and the Danube
shore have a good general ecological status. Most of
the sites are undisturbed, providing proper conditions
for amphibians. Practically all the species are common
ones in this region. We assume that even the newts are
more common than it could suggest the limited number
of records.
Three species of amphibians, cited in the literature
as species occurring in this region, were not found by
the author during the investigations. The Agile Frog
(Rana dalmatina) was probably not recorded because
of the limited time we had to survey the area. The other
two species have secretive life (the Common Spadefoot
- Pelobates fuscus, the Eastern Spadefoot - Pelobates
syriacus), being difficult to observe during day-time.
The Eastern Spadefoot has been previously recorded in
IHZVLWHV% FHVFX)XKQ)XKQ
The Balkan Wall Lizard (Podarcis taurica) and the
Green Lizard (Lacerta viridis) are the most common
reptiles in the region. Green Lizards occurred in more
than half of the investigated sites. The Balkan Wall
Lizards were frequently met in the western half of the
target region, meanwhile the Sand Lizards (Lacerta
agilis) were observed only in the eastern part of the
target region.
Among the reptiles there are two species that have
not been recorded previously from this area. The
Common Wall Lizard (Podarcis muralis) is known to
occur only in Banat, southern Transilvania and
Dobrogea. The record site from Giurgiu is at huge
distance from the closest known record site in Romania
(e.g. Canaraua Fetii from Dobrogea). The other species
not mentioned before in this area is the Green Lizard
(Lacerta viridis). This is probably due to the scarce (if
any) faunistical investigations carried out in the sites
placed in the vicinity of the state frontier.
Three species of reptiles, previously known in this
region, were not observed during the investigations. These
species are the European Pond Terrapin (Emys orbicularis),
the Dice Snake (Natrix tessellata) and the Large Whip Snake
(Coluber caspius).
CONCLUSIONS
During our field investigations we have observed 7
species of amphibians and 5 species of reptiles living in the
areas placed in the close vicinity of the Danube river. Two
species have not been previously mentioned in the target
area. This new records increase to 18 species the regional
herpetofaunistical list.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is indebted to Dr. Nichersu Iulian for making
SRVVLEOHWKHILHOGLQYHVWLJDWLRQVDQGWR'U % FHVFX 0'U
&RJ OQLFHDQX'DQG'U2 HO9IRUWKHLUKHOSLQSURYLGLQJ
some of the bibliography.
REZUMAT
ÌQ FXUVXO DQXOXL  DXWRUXO D HIHFWXDW LQYHVWLJD LL
KHUSHWRIDXQLVWLFH vQ YDOHD 'XQ ULL SH VHFWRUXO &DODIDW
& O UDúL 6WXGLLOH DX IRVW UHDOL]DWH vQ ]RQHOH GLQWUH PDOXO
IOXYLXOXLúLOLPLWD WHUDVHL FRQWLQHQWDOHÌQDFHDVW  UHJLXQHDX
IRVWLGHQWLILFDWH VSHFLL GHDPILELHQL úL  VSHFLL GHUHSWLOH
ùRSkUOD GH ]LGXUL Podarcis muralis úL JXúWHUXO Lacerta
viridisVXQWVSHFLLVHPQDODWHSHQWUX SULPDGDW GLQVHFWRUXO
VWXGLDW $FHVWH vQUHJLVWU UL ULGLF  OD  QXP UXO VSHFLLORU
LQFOXVH vQ OLVWD KHUSHWRIDXQLVWLF  UHJLRQDO  GLQ OLWHUDWXU
fiind cunoscute numai 16 specii observate anterior).
REFERENCES
1. % &(6&8  0  ± Pelobates syriacus balcanicus
.DUDPDQ R EURDVF  QRX  SHQWUX IDXQD 5HSXEOLFLL
3RSXODUH5RPvQH&RPXQLF ULOH$FDGHPLHL535WRPXO
,9QU±SDJ±%XFXUHúWL
2. ARNOLD E. N., BURTON J. A., 1978 Reptiles and
Amphibians of Britain and Europe. Pag. 1 272. Edit.
Collins, London.
3. & /,1(6&8 5 ,±&RQWULEX LXQLVLVWHPDWLFHúL
]RRJHRJUDILFH OD VWXGLXO DPSKLELLORU úL UHSWLOHORU GLQ
5RPkQLD $5 ± 0HPRULLOH 6HF LXQLL ùWLLQ LILFH 6HULD
,,,WRP9,,SDJ±%XFXUHúWL
4. &2* /1,&($18 '±$SUHOLPLQDU\UHSRUWRQ
the geographical distribution of amphibians in Romania.
Rev. Roum. Biol. Biol. Anim., tome 36, No. 1 – 2,
SDJ±%XFXUHúWL
5. &2* /1,&($18  ' $,2$1(, ) %2*'$1 0
2000 – Amfibienii din România. Determinator. Pag. 1
(GLW$UV'RFHQGL%XFXUHúWL
6. &58 &( 0  ± 2EVHUYD LL SULYLQG U VSkQGLUHD
JHRJUDILF úLHFRORJLDúRSvUOHLGHLDUE Lacerta taurica
3DOODV vQ 5RPkQLD 6W úL &HUF %LRO 6HULD =RRORJLH
7RPXOQUSDJ±%XFXUHúWL
7. FUHN I., 1960 – AMPHIBIA. Fauna RPR, vol. XIV,
)DVFSDJ%XFXUHúWL
119
8. )8 + 1,± 6LWXD LDDFWXDO D IDXQHL QRDVWUH
GHDPILELLúLUHSWLOHúLRFURWLUHDHL2FURWQDWWRP
QUSDJ±%XFXUHúWL
9. )8 + 1 , 9$1&($ ùW  ± 5(37,/,$
HVWRDVH úRSvUOH úHUSL )DXQD 535 YRO ;,9
)DVFSDJ±%XFXUHúWL
10. LEHRER A. Z., LEHRER Maria, 1990
&DUWRJUDILHUHD IDXQHL úL IORUHL &RRUGRQDWH
arealografice). Pag. 1 290. Edit. Ceres,
%XFXUHúWL
11. MARSIGLI L. F., 1744 – Description du Danube
depuis la montagne de Kalenberg en Autriche
jusqu’au confluent de la rivière Iantra en Bulgarie.
Haga.
12. TATOLE Victoria, STERGHIU Cleopatra, COCIU
0DULD±&DUDFWHULVWLFLDOHGLYHUVLW LLIDXQLVWLFHvQ
]RQD ' EXOHQL%HFKHW MXG 'ROM Ocrot. nat. med.
înconj.WRPQUSDJ±%XFXUHúWL
AUTHOR’S ADDRESS
ZSOLT TÖRÖK - Institutul 1D LRQDO GH Cercetare úL
Dezvoltare “Delta 'XQ ULL´ Str. Bbabdag nr. 165, 8800
Tulcea, România, e-mail: torok@indd.tim.ro
... However, these were little studied in the precise area of my study until recently; 9 species of amphibians and 3 of reptiles were recorded from only two localities combined (Fuhn, 1960;Fuhn & Vancea, 1961;Cruce, 1972;Cogãlniceanu et al., 2000). In the later years substantial data was added by Török (2001), in the wider context of the lower Danube floodplain, recording 4 more species in the area of my study (Triturus vulgaris, Lacreta agilis, Podarcis muralis, Natrix natrix). This study endeavoured to further document the present composition and situation of the herpetofaunal communities all along the Danube left bank in the county of Giurgiu, in the remaining seasonally flooded areas as well as on some islets in the Danube, which can be seen as part of the seasonally flooded ecosystem complex, since they are totally or partially submerged at high waters. ...
... Triturus vulgaris (L.) (Smooth Newt) This species is recorded by Török (2001) at Gostinu. I found it in small, wellvegetated temporary ponds along ªaica lake (which is an isolated arm of the Danube) and by the partly derelict fish ponds of the Slobozia fish farm. ...
... Bufo viridis Laur. (Green Toad) It is recorded by Cogãlniceanu et al. (2000) from Giurgiu, and by Török (2001) at Gostinu. I found it at Gãujani, ªaica lake, Slobozia fishponds and by the levee, at Giurgiu by the ruined chemical plant, in the Penciu forest and by a draining ditch at Gostinu. ...
Article
Full-text available
The results of herpetological observations, carried in April and June 2004 in the Danube floodplain sector of the Giurgiu county are presented here. 7 species of amphibians and 7 species of reptiles were found, most of which are characteristic of the floodplain ecosystem and were expected to occur here. Special mention must be made of the presence of the Wall Lizard, Podarcis muralis, which occcurs only in a few population on human-created stony habitats and is obviously introduced by human agency. Résumé. On présente les résultats des investigations herpétologiques réalisées en april et juin 2004 dans les terres inondables avoisinant le Danube dans le département de Giurgiu. On a recensé 7 espèces d'amphibiens et 7 de reptiles, dont la plupart sont caractéristiques pour les écosystèmes inondables, leur présence étant à prévoir. Une mention spécielle doit être faite sur le Lézard des Murailles, Podarcis muralis, qui est présent dans quelques populations vivant sur des habitats pierreux anthropogènes, en étant evidemment introduites par l'homme.
... Thus, the territory of the country which would be climatically suitable for E. jaculus, has broadened to the whole Dobruja, Danube floodplain and eastern Bărăgan Plain, areas where also the soil meets the species requirements. It seems, however, very difficult to identify the species due to its nocturnal lifestyle (Fuhn and Vancea, 1961), not being previously reported in Danube floodplain although some extensive herpetological studies in the area were conducted (Iftime, 2005a;Iftime and Iftime, 2007;Török, 2001). ...
Article
Full-text available
In September 2011 we identified a killed specimen of Eryx jaculus on the road between the towns of Turnu Mǎgurele and Corabia, in southern Romania. This seems to be the first record of the species north of the Danube. Although surprising, the identification of E. jaculus in the area is interpreted in the light of the presence of other species of herpetofauna in the Danube floodplain with similar ecological requirements, reaching here their northern distribution limit. Survival of the species appears to be favoured by the existence of some protected areas in the region.
... The techniques employed, and their timing, need to be specific to the four crested newt species to be effective. For example, during general herpetological surveys of the lower Danube area of Romania only one specimen of Triturus dobrogicus was actually recorded (Török 2001). It is likely that monitoring will need to be carried out on a sample basis for such widespread species, in which case the methods should be standardised across Europe and be statistically robust. ...
... However, in recent years, several authors have undertaken herpetofaunistic surveys of that region (e.g. Török 2001, Lazăr et al. 2005, Ţibu & Strugariu 2007) with only few localities yielding dice snakes during three surveys (Iftime 2005c, Iftime & Iftime 2007, 2008). Yet, records of dice snakes along most rivers at the border between southern Romania and Bulgaria (Naumov et al. 2011) indicate, that this species has been overlooked and exhibits a wider distribution in southern Romania. ...
Article
Full-text available
In Romania, the dice snake (Natrix tessellata) has been, until recently omitted from any specific studies and its national distribution and ecology is only known from accounts in numerous dispersed papers which discuss the general distribution of the herpetofauna in several regions. Here we aim to present an updated review of the histori-cal and current distribution, habitat preferences, and the current conservation status of the dice snake in Romania. The species is widespread in western Romania, in the interior and to the west of the Carpathian Basin (Transylva-nia) where it inhabits large rivers, fish farms and thermal aquatic habitats. In southwestern Romania, the species is common along the main rivers (Danube, Cerna, Jiu). In southern Romania it has been recorded in several habitats (mostly in natural ponds located in deciduous forests and in a few habitats along the Danube). In eastern Romania (Moldavia), the species has been recorded from five localities in the past century. Despite numerous recent surveys, only three populations were recently confirmed to have survived. In the southeastern part of the country (Dobrud-ja), it is also a common species in brackish lakes, lagoons, and fish farms. Based on the total number of localities in which the species has been recorded and the number of recently confirmed localities, we propose a status of vulner-able (VU) for Natrix tesellata in Romania.
Article
Full-text available
The results of faunistical surveys of the amphibians in Teleorman county (Southern Romania) are presented here; we have identified nine amphibian species (Triturus cristatus, Lissotriton vulgaris, Bombina bombina, Pelobates syriacus, P. fuscus, Bufo bufo, B. viridis, Hyla arborea, Rana dalmatina, Pelophylax ridibundus), two amphibian hybrids (Triturus cristatus × T. dobrogicus and Pelophylax kl. esculentus) and six reptile species (Emys orbicularis, Lacerta agilis, L. viridis, Podarcis tauricus, Natrix natrix, Dolichophis caspius), with new records for many of these.
Article
Full-text available
The results of herpetological faunistical surveys in the Danube floodplain in the area of the Balta Ialomiþei, Romania, are presented; we have identified 11 amphibian species (3 of which are firstly recorded in the study area) and 8 reptile species. We note the apparent healthy populations in most species and some colonization processes in which steppic species start occupying habitats that were artificially drained. Résumé. On présente les résultats des études faunistiques herpétologiques dans la plaine alluviale du Danube dans la région de Balta Ialomiþei (Roumanie); on y a identifié 12 espèces d'amphibiens (dont 3 nouvellement signalées) et 8 espèces de reptiles. On note que la plupart des populations paraîssent saines, et pour quelques espèces steppiques on remarque une tendance à coloniser des habitats artificiellement drainés.
Article
Full-text available
Research on isolated populations of common wall lizard Podarcis muralis (Laurenti, 1768) (Reptilia) from Dobrogea (Romania and Bulgaria) The isolated populations of common wall lizard Podarcis muralis from Dobrogea are strictly located in a few rocky habitats situated in the southern area of this geographical province. The sizes of these populations are small, compared to the populations from the rest of the area occupied by the species. This aspect, together with their strict location, makes them suitable for complex population studies. The work hypothesis was that the common wall lizard populations in Dobrogea are not connected to those from the Carpathians, the Danube and the Romanian Plain being bio-geographical barriers. In light of this hypothesis, the colonization of Dobrogea by the common wall lizard occurred from the south with individuals coming from populations located in the Balkan Peninsula.
Article
Full-text available
The results of faunistical and multi-year abundance surveys of the herpetofauna in the Giurgiu county (Romania) are presented here; we have identified 11 amphibian species and 12 reptile species, with new records for many of these. We note that most species were relatively stable in their abundance between 2000 and 2005/2006; a decline was, however, noted in some species, notably in the widespread and relatively common Lacerta agilis. Résumé. On présente les résultats des études faunistiques et concernant l'abondance multiannuelle des amphibiens et des reptiles du département de Giurgiu (Roumanie); on y a identifié 11 espèces d'amphibiens et 12 espèces de reptiles, mentionnant de nouvelles localités pour bon nombre de ces espèces. On note que la plupart des populations y maintiennent leur abondance entre les années 2000 et 2005/2006; on remarque, cependant, un déclin chez quelques espèces, notamment chez l'espèce largement répandue et relativement commune Lacerta agilis.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.