VOL. 18, No. 2 A PUBLICATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA FEBRUARY 2008
Field Forum Scheduled, p. 13
New GSA Members, p. 17
Inside this issue:Inside this issue:
4 FEBRUA RY 2008, GS A TODAY
GSA Today: v. 18, no. 2, doi: 10.1130/GSAT01802A.1
Are we now living in the Anthropocene?
Jan Zalasiewicz, Mark Williams, Department of Geology,
University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK; Alan Smith,
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK; Tiffany L. Barry, Angela L. Coe,
Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton
Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK; Paul R. Bown, Department
of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street,
London, WC1E 6BT, UK; Patrick Brenchley, Department of
Earth Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK;
David Cantrill, Royal Botanic Gardens, Birdwood Avenue,
South Yarra, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Andrew Gale,
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of
Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 3QL, UK, and
Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum,
London SW7 5BD, UK; Philip Gibbard, Department of
Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place,
Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK; F. John Gregory, Petro-Strat Ltd, 33
Royston Road, St. Albans, Herts AL1 5NF, UK, and Department
of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD,
UK; Mark W. Hounslow, Centre for Environmental Magnetism
and Palaeomagnetism, Geography Department, Lancaster
University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, UK; Andrew C. Kerr, Paul
Pearson, School of Earth, Ocean and Planetary Sciences,
Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10
3YE, UK; Robert Knox, John Powell, Colin Waters, British
Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottinghamshire NG12 5GG,
UK; John Marshall, National Oceanography Centre, University
of Southampton, University Road, Southampton SO14 3ZH,
UK; Michael Oates, BG Group plc, 100 Thames Valley Park
Drive, Reading RG6 1PT, UK; Peter Rawson, Scarborough
Centre for Environmental and Marine Sciences, University of
Hull, Scarborough Campus, Filey Road, Scarborough YO11
3AZ, UK, and Department of Earth Sciences, University
College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK; and
Philip Stone, British Geological Survey, Murchison House,
Edinburgh EH9 3LA, UK
The term Anthropocene, proposed and increasingly employed
to denote the current interval of anthropogenic global environ-
mental change, may be discussed on stratigraphic grounds. A
case can be made for its consideration as a formal epoch in that,
since the start of the Industrial Revolution, Earth has endured
changes sufficient to leave a global stratigraphic signature dis-
tinct from that of the Holocene or of previous Pleistocene inter-
glacial phases, encompassing novel biotic, sedimentary, and
geochemical change. These changes, although likely only in
their initial phases, are sufficiently distinct and robustly estab-
lished for suggestions of a Holocene–Anthropocene bound-
ary in the recent historical past to be geologically reasonable.
The boundary may be defined either via Global Stratigraphic
Section and Point (“golden spike”) locations or by adopting a
numerical date. Formal adoption of this term in the near future
will largely depend on its utility, particularly to earth scientists
working on late Holocene successions. This datum, from the
perspective of the far future, will most probably approximate a
distinctive stratigraphic boundary.
In 2002, Paul Crutzen, the Nobel Prize–winning chemist, sug-
gested that we had left the Holocene and had entered a new
Epoch—the Anthropocene—because of the global environ-
mental effects of increased human population and economic
development. The term has entered the geological literature
informally (e.g., Steffen et al., 2004; Syvitski et al., 2005; Cross-
land, 2005; Andersson et al., 2005) to denote the contemporary
global environment dominated by human activity. Here, mem-
bers of the Stratigraphy Commission of the Geological Society
of London amplify and extend the discussion of the effects
referred to by Crutzen and then apply the same criteria used to
set up new epochs to ask whether there really is justification or
need for a new term, and if so, where and how its boundary
might be placed.
The Holocene is the latest of many Quaternary interglacial
phases and the only one to be accorded the status of an epoch;
it is also the only unit in the whole of the Phanerozoic—the
past 542 m.y.—whose base is defined in terms of numbers
of years from the present, taken as 10,000 radiocarbon years
before 1950. The bases of all other periods, epochs, and ages
from the Cambrian onward are defined by—or shortly will be
defined by—“golden spikes” (Gradstein et al., 2004), in which
a suitable section is chosen as a Global Stratotype Section, the
“golden spike” being placed at an agreed point within it, giving
rise to a Global Stratigraphic Section and Point, or GSSP.
To bring the definition of the base of the Holocene into line
with all other Phanerozoic boundaries, there are intentions to cre-
ate a GSSP for the base of the Holocene in an ice core, specifically
in the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP) ice core, at the
beginning of an interval at which deuterium values (a proxy for
local air temperature) rise, an event rapidly followed by a marked
decrease in dust levels and an increase in ice layer thickness (ICS,
2006). This level lies very near the beginning of the changes that
ushered in interglacial conditions, but is some 1700 yr older than
the current definition for the base of the Holocene. One might
question whether ice is a suitably permanent material, but in this
instance it is important that the GSSP is a tangible horizon within
a stratigraphic sequence, a “time plane” marking an elapsed, dis-
tinctive, and correlatable geological event rather than an arbitrary
or “abstract” numerical age. We note here, though (and discuss
further below), that this logic need not necessarily be followed in
any putative definition of the beginning of the Anthropocene.
The early Holocene was a time of pronounced rises in global
temperature, stabilizing at ca. 11,000 cal. yr B.P., and sea level,
stabilizing at ca. 8000 cal. yr B.P. (Fig. 1). Temperatures and sea
GSA TODAY, FEB RUARY 200 8 5
level then reached a marked plateau where they have, until very
recently, remained. This climate plateau, though modulated by
millennial-scale global temperature oscillations of ~1 °C ampli-
tude, represents the longest interval of stability of climate and
sea level in at least the past 400,000 yr. This stability has been a
significant factor in the development of human civilization.
HUMAN INFLUENCE ON HOLOCENE CLIMATE AND
Prior to the Industrial Revolution, the global human population
was some 300 million at A.D. 1000, 500 million at A.D. 1500, and
790 million by A.D. 1750 (United Nations, 1999), and exploitation
of energy was limited mostly to firewood and muscle power. Evi-
dence recorded in Holocene strata indicates increasing levels of
human influence, though human remains and artifacts are mostly
rare. Stratigraphic signals from the mid-part of the epoch in areas
settled by humans are predominantly biotic (pollen of weeds
and cultivars following land clearance for agriculture) with more
ambiguous sedimentary signals (such as sediment pulses from
deforested regions). Atmospheric lead pollution is registered in
polar ice caps and peat bog deposits from Greco-Roman times
onward (Dunlap et al., 1999; Paula and Geraldes, 2003), and
it has been argued that the early to mid-Holocene increase in
atmospheric carbon dioxide from ~260–280 ppm, a factor in the
climatic warmth of this interval, resulted from forest clearance
by humans (Ruddiman, 2003). Human activity then may help
characterize Holocene strata, but it did not create new, global
environmental conditions that could translate into a fundamen-
tally different stratigraphic signal.
From the beginning of the Industrial Revolution to the pres-
ent day, global human population has climbed rapidly from
under a billion to its current 6.5 billion (Fig. 1), and it continues
to rise. The exploitation of coal, oil, and gas in particular has
enabled planet-wide industrialization, construction, and mass
transport, the ensuing changes encompassing a wide variety of
phenomena, summarized as follows.
Changes to Physical Sedimentation
Humans have caused a dramatic increase in erosion and the
denudation of the continents, both directly, through agriculture
and construction, and indirectly, by damming most major riv-
ers, that now exceeds natural sediment production by an order
of magnitude (Hooke, 2000; Wilkinson, 2005; Syvitski et al.,
2005; see Fig. 1). This equates to a distinct lithostratigraphic
signal, particularly when considered alongside the preservable
human artifacts (e.g., the “Made Ground” of British Geological
Survey maps) associated with accelerated industrialization.
Carbon Cycle Perturbation and Temperature
Carbon dioxide levels (379 ppm in 2005) are over a third higher
than in pre-industrial times and at any time in the past 0.9 m.y.
(IPCC, 2007; EPICA community members, 2004). Conservatively,
these levels are predicted to double by the end of the twenty-first
century (IPCC, 2007). Methane concentrations in the atmosphere
have already roughly doubled. These changes have been consid-
erably more rapid than those associated with glacial-interglacial
transitions (Fig. 1; cf. Monnin et al., 2001).
Global temperature has lagged behind this increase in green-
house gas levels, perhaps as a result of industrially derived
sulfate aerosols (the “global dimming” effect; Coakley, 2005).
Figure 1. Comparison of some major stratigraphically significant trends
over the past 15,000 yr. Trends typical of the bulk of immediately pre-
Holocene and Holocene time are compared with those of the past two
centuries. Data compiled from sources including Hooke (1994), Monnin
et al. (2001), Wilkinson (2005), and Behre (2007).
Nevertheless, temperatures in the past century rose overall, the
rate of increase accelerating in the past two decades (Fig. 1).
There is now scientific consensus that anthropogenic carbon
emissions are the cause (King, 2004; IPCC, 2007). Temperature
is predicted to rise by 1.1 °C to 6.4 °C by the end of this century
(IPCC, 2007), leading to global temperatures not encountered
since the Tertiary. The predicted temperatures are similar to the
estimated 5 °C average global temperature rises in the Toarcian
(ca. 180 Ma) and at the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum
(PETM, ca. 56 Ma), which were most probably linked to natu-
ral carbon releases into the atmosphere (Thomas et al., 2002;
Kemp et al., 2005). While the likely societal effects are clear,
in our present analysis we focus on the stratigraphic conse-
quences of increased temperature.
Humans have caused extinctions of animal and plant spe-
cies, possibly as early as the late Pleistocene, with the dis-
appearance of a large proportion of the terrestrial megafauna
6 FEBRUA RY 2008, GS A TODAY
(Barnosky et al., 2004). Accelerated extinctions and biotic pop-
ulation declines on land have spread into the shallow seas,
notably on coral reefs (Bellwood et al., 2004) and the oceans
(Baum et al., 2003; Myers and Worm, 2003). The rate of biotic
change may produce a major extinction event (Wilson, 2002)
analogous to those that took place at the K-T boundary and
elsewhere in the stratigraphic column.
The projected temperature rise will certainly cause changes in
habitat beyond environmental tolerance for many taxa (Thomas
et al., 2004). The effects will be more severe than in past glacial-
interglacial transitions because, with the anthropogenic fragmen-
tation of natural ecosystems, “escape” routes are fewer.
The combination of extinctions, global species migrations
(Cox, 2004), and the widespread replacement of natural vege-
tation with agricultural monocultures is producing a distinctive
contemporary biostratigraphic signal. These effects are perma-
nent, as future evolution will take place from surviving (and
frequently anthropogenically relocated) stocks.
Pre-industrial mid- to late Holocene sea-level stability has
followed an ~120 m rise from the late Pleistocene level (Fig. 1).
Slight rises in sea level have been noted over the past century,
ascribed to a combination of ice melt and thermal expansion of
the oceans (IPCC, 2007). The rate and extent of near-future sea-
level rise depends on a range of factors that affect snow pro-
duction and ice melt; the IPCC (2007) predicted a 0.19–0.58 m
rise by 2100. This prediction does not factor in recent evidence
of dynamic ice-sheet behavior and accelerating ice loss (Rignot
and Thomas, 2002; Overpeck et al., 2006; Hansen et al., 2007)
possibly analogous to those preceding “Heinrich events” of the
late Pleistocene and early Holocene, when repeated episodes
of ice-sheet collapse (Bond et al., 1992) caused concomitant
rapid sea-level rise (Blanchon and Shaw, 1995). Current pre-
dictions are short-term, while changes to the final equilibrium
state may be as large as a 10–30 m sea-level rise per 1 °C tem-
perature rise (Rahmstorf, 2007).
Relative to pre–Industrial Revolution oceans, surface ocean
waters are now 0.1 pH units more acidic due to anthropo-
genic carbon release (Caldeira and Wickett, 2003), a change
echoed in the stable carbon isotope composition of contem-
porary foraminiferal tests (Al-Rousan et al., 2004). The future
amount of this acidification, scaled to projected future carbon
emissions, its spread through the ocean water column, and its
eventual neutralization (over many millennia) has been mod-
eled (Barker et al., 2003). Projected effects will be physical
(neutralization of the excess acid by dissolution of ocean-floor
carbonate sediment, hence creating a widespread non sequence)
and biological (hindering carbonate-secreting organisms in
building their skeletons), with potentially severe effects in both
benthic (especially coral reef) and planktonic settings (Riebe-
sell et al., 2000; Orr et al., 2005). A similar acidification event
accompanied the PETM at ca. 56 Ma, and, indeed, its effect in
dissolving strata has hindered the precise deciphering of that
event (Zachos et al., 2005).
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS INTERGLACIALS
The sensitivity of climate to greenhouse gases, and the scale
of (historically) modern biotic change, makes it likely that we
have entered a stratigraphic interval without close parallel in
any previous Quaternary interglacial. The nearest parallels
seem to be earlier episodes of high atmospheric pCO2 and
global warming (e.g., Toarcian; the PETM), but the ice volumes
then were small, and melting caused only modest sea-level
rises (~20 m at the PETM, partly through thermal expansion;
Speijer and Marsi, 2002; Speijer and Wagner, 2002). The mid-
Pliocene, at 3 Ma, may be a closer analogue: atmospheric pCO2
levels may have reached 380 ppm, and the polar ice caps were
somewhat smaller than present, with global sea level higher by
10–20 m (Dowsett et al., 1999; Dowsett, 2007).
The present interval might evolve into the “super-interglacial”
envisaged by Broecker (1987), with Earth reverting to climates
and sea levels last seen in warmer phases of the Miocene or
Pliocene (Haywood et al., 2005), most likely achieved via a
geologically abrupt rearrangement of the ocean-atmosphere
system (Broecker, 1997; Schneider, 2004). Such a warm phase
will likely last considerably longer than normal Quaternary
interglacials. It is not clear that an equilibrium comparable to
that of pre-industrial Quaternary time will eventually resume.
Formal subdivision of the Phanerozoic timescale is not sim-
ply a numerical exercise of parceling up time into units of
equal length akin to the centuries and millennia of recent his-
tory. Rather, the geological timescale is based upon recogniz-
ing distinctive events within strata. Time may be divided into
specific, recognizable phases in Earth’s environmental history
(in particular as regards biota, climate, and sea level), akin to
the use of royal dynasties to denote periods of human history
(e.g., the Victorian period of the nineteenth and earliest twenti-
eth centuries). Such concepts of the “naturalness” of boundar-
ies underlie, for example, the current debates on the position-
ing of the boundary of the Quaternary period (Gibbard et al.,
2005) and on subdivision of the Precambrian (Bleeker, 2004).
Geologically, units of equivalent rank do not necessarily
have to be of equivalent time span, particularly as the present
is approached. Thus, the Quaternary, whether its beginning is
placed at 1.8 Ma or 2.6 Ma, is by an order of magnitude the
shortest period, while the Holocene, at a little under 12,000
calendar years (ICS, 2006) is, by at least two orders of magni-
tude, the shortest epoch. This inequality has not been seriously
disputed, partly because of its practical usefulness. The preced-
ing discussion makes clear that we have entered a distinctive
phase of Earth’s evolution that satisfies geologists’ criteria for
its recognition as a distinctive stratigraphic unit, to which the
name Anthropocene has already been informally given.
We consider it most reasonable for this new unit to be consid-
ered at epoch level. It is true that the long-term consequences
of anthropogenic change might be of sufficient magnitude to
precipitate the return of “Tertiary” levels of ice volume, sea
level, and global temperature that may then persist over several
eccentricity (100 k.y.) cycles (e.g., Tyrrell et al., 2007). This,
especially in combination with a major extinction event, would
effectively bring the Quaternary period to an end. However,
given the large uncertainties in the future trajectory of climate
and biodiversity, and the large and currently unpredictable
action of feedbacks in the earth system, we prefer to remain
conservative. Thus, while there is strong evidence to suggest
that we are no longer living in the Holocene (as regards the
GSA TODAY, FEB RUARY 200 8 7
processes affecting the production and character of contempo-
rary strata), it is too early to state whether or not the Quater-
nary has come to an end.
GOLDEN SPIKE OR YEARS?
For a new epoch to be formally established, either a GSSP
needs to be selected or a date for its inception needs to be
accepted, which is then ratified by the International Commis-
sion on Stratigraphy (ICS). Because it should be possible to
select a stratigraphic unit whose age is known in years, the
Anthropocene can be defined simultaneously by both criteria,
without the uncertainty that bedevils attempts to date older
GSSPs. In theory, a point in a section, or a date, that coincides
with the end of the pre-industrial Holocene could be selected.
However, given that India and China are currently undergo-
ing their own industrial revolution, the selection of a horizon
marking the end of pre-industrial (western) history may be
inappropriate. Potential GSSPs and ages should allow strati-
graphic resolution to annual level, and may be best located in
ice cores or stagnant-lake basin cores.
One may consider using the rise of CO2 levels above back-
ground levels as a marker, roughly at the beginning of the Indus-
trial Revolution in the West (following Crutzen, 2002), or the sta-
ble carbon isotope changes reflecting the influx of anthropogenic
carbon (Al-Rousan et al., 2004). However, although abrupt on
centennial-millennial timescales, these changes are too gradual to
provide useful markers at an annual or decadal level (while the
CO2 record in ice cores, also, is offset from that of the enclosing
ice layers by the time taken to isolate the air bubbles from the
atmosphere during compaction of the snow).
From a practical viewpoint, a globally identifiable level is
provided by the global spread of radioactive isotopes created
by the atomic bomb tests of the 1960s; however, this post-
dates the major inflection in global human activity. Perhaps the
best stratigraphic marker near the beginning of the nineteenth
century has a natural cause: the eruption of Mount Tambora
in April 1815, which produced the “year without a summer”
in the Northern Hemisphere and left a marked aerosol sul-
fate “spike” in ice layers in both Greenland and Antarctica and
a distinct signal in the dendrochronological record (Oppen-
In the case of the Anthropocene, however, it is not clear
that—for current practical purposes—a GSSP is immediately
necessary. At the level of resolution sought, and at this tem-
poral distance, it may be that simply selecting a numerical age
(say the beginning of 1800) may be an equally effective practi-
cal measure. This would allow (for the present and near future)
simple and unambiguous correlation of the stratigraphical and
historical records and give consistent utility and meaning to
this as yet informal (but increasingly used) term.
Sufficient evidence has emerged of stratigraphically signifi-
cant change (both elapsed and imminent) for recognition of
the Anthropocene—currently a vivid yet informal metaphor
of global environmental change—as a new geological epoch
to be considered for formalization by international discussion.
The base of the Anthropocene may be defined by a GSSP in
sediments or ice cores or simply by a numerical date.
R. Knox, J. Powell, Colin Waters, and P. Stone publish with the permis-
sion of the Director, British Geological Survey (National Environmental
Research Council). We thank W. Ruddiman, F. Gradstein, and an anony-
mous referee for useful criticism of an earlier version of this paper.
Al-Rousan, S., Pätzold, J., Al-Moghrabi, S., and Wefer, G., 2004, Invasion of anthro-
pogenic CO2 recorded in planktonic foraminifera from the northern Gulf of
Aquaba: International Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 93, p. 1066–1076, doi:
Andersson, A.J., Mackenzie, F.T., and Lerman, A., 2005, Coastal ocean and carbon-
ate systems in the high CO2 world of the Anthropocene: American Journal of
Science, v. 305, p. 875–918, doi: 10.2475/ajs.305.9.875.
Barker, S., Higgins, J.A., and Elderfield, H., 2003, The future of the carbon cycle:
review, calcification response, ballast and feedback on atmospheric CO2:
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London–A, v. A361,
Barnosky, A.D., Koch, P.L., Feranec, R.S., Wing, S.L., and Shabel, A.B., 2004, Assessing
the causes of Late Pleistocene extinctions on the continents: Science, v. 306,
p. 70–75, doi: 10.1126/science.1101476.
Baum, J.K., Myers, R.A., Kehler, D.K., Worm, B., Harley, S.H., and Doherty, P.A.,
2003, Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the northwest Atlantic:
Science, v. 299, p. 389–392, doi: 10.1126/science.1079777.
Behre, K.-E., 2007, A new Holocene sea-level curve for the southern North Sea:
Boreas, v. 36, p. 82–102.
Bellwood, D.R., Hughes, T.P., and Nystrom, N., 2004, Confronting the coral reef cri-
sis: Nature, v. 429, p. 827–833, doi: 10.1038/nature02691.
Blanchon, P., and Shaw, J., 1995, Reef drowning during the last glaciation: Evidence
for catastrophic sea-level rise and ice-sheet collapse: Geology, v. 23, p. 4–8,
Bleeker, W., 2004, Towards a ‘natural’ time scale for the Precambrian—A proposal:
Lethaia, v. 37, p. 219–222, doi: 10.1080/00241160410006456.
Bond, G., Heinrich, H., Broecker, W., Labeyrie, L., McManus, J., Andrews, J., Huon,
S., Jantschik, R., Clasen, S., Simet, C., Tedesco, K., Klas, M., Bonani, G.,
and Ivy, S., 1992, Evidence of massive discharge of icebergs into the North
Atlantic Ocean during the last glacial period: Nature, v. 360, p. 245–249, doi:
Broecker, W.S., 1987, How to build a habitable planet: New York, Eldigio Press, 291 p.
Broecker, W.S., 1997, Thermohaline circulation, the Achilles heel of our climate
system: Will man-made CO2 upset the current balance?: Science, v. 278,
p. 1582–1588, doi: 10.1126/science.278.5343.1582.
Caldeira, K., and Wickett, M.E., 2003, Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH: Nature,
v. 425, p. 365, doi: 10.1038/425365a.
Coakley, J., 2005, Reflections on aerosol cooling: Nature, v. 438, p. 1091–1092, doi:
Cox, G.W., 2004, Alien species and evolution: The evolutionary ecology of exotic
plants, animals, microbes and interacting native species: Washington, D.C.,
Island Press, 377 p.
Crossland, C.J., ed., 2005, Coastal fluxes in the Anthropocene: Berlin, Springer, 231 p.
Crutzen, P.J., 2002, Geology of mankind: Nature, v. 415, p. 23, doi:
Dowsett, H.J., 2007, The PRISM paleoclimate reconstruction and Pliocene sea-sur-
face temperature, in Williams, M., Haywood, A.M., Gregory, F.J., and Schmidt,
D.N., Deep-time perspectives on climate change: Marrying the signal from
computer models and biological proxies: London, The Geological Society,
Micropaleontological Society Special Publications, p. 459–480.
Dowsett, H.J., Barron, J.A., Poore, R.Z., Thompson, R.S., Cronin, T.M., Ishman, S.E.,
and Willard, D.A., 1999, Middle Pliocene paleoenvironmental reconstruction:
PRISM2: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-535, 19 p.
Dunlap, C.E., Steinnes, E., and Flegal, A.R., 1999, A synthesis of lead isotopes in two
millennia of European air: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 167, p. 81–88,
EPICA (European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica) community members, 2004,
Eight glacial cycles from an Antarctic ice core: Nature, v. 429, p. 623–628.
Gibbard, P.L., Smith, A.G., Zalasiewicz, J.A., Barry, T.L., Cantrill, D., Coe, A.L., Cope,
J.C.W., Gale, A.S., Gregory, F.J., Powell, J.H., Rawson, P.R., Stone, P., and
Waters, C.W., 2005, What status for the Quaternary?: Boreas, v. 34, p. 1–6, doi:
Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., and Smith, A.G., eds., 2004, A Geological Time Scale
2004: Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 589 p.
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Russell, G., Lea, D.A., and Siddall, M., 2007,
Climate change and trace gases: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society, v. A365, p. 1925–1954.
Haywood, A.M., Dekens, P., Ravelo, A.C., and Williams, M., 2005, Warmer tropics
during the mid-Pliocene? Evidence from alkenone paleothermometry and a
fully coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems,
v. 6, doi: 10.1029/2004GC000799.
Hooke, R.LeB., 2000, On the history of humans as geomorphic agents: Geology, v. 28,
p. 843–846, doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<843:OTHOHA>2.0.CO;2.
ICS (International Commission on Stratigraphy), 2006, Subcommission on Quaternary
8 FEBRUA RY 2008, GS A TODAY
Stratigraphy, Annual Report 2006: http://www.quaternary.stratigraphy.org.uk/
about/annualreports/annrepindex.html (last accessed 28 Apr. 2007).
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2007, Climate change 2007:
Synthesis report. Summary for policy makers: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/
assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf (last accessed 3 Dec. 2007).
Kemp, D.B., Coe, A.L., Cohen, A.S., and Schwark, L., 2005, Astronomical pacing of
methane release in the Early Jurassic Period: Nature, v. 437, p. 396–399, doi:
King, D.A., 2004, Climate change science: Science, v. 303, p. 176–177, doi: 10.1126/
Monnin, E., Indermühle, A., Dällenbach, A., Flückiger, J., Stauffer, B., Stocker, T.S.,
Reynaud, D., and Barnola, J.-M., 2001, Atmospheric CO2 concentrations
over the Last Glacial Termination: Science, v. 291, p. 112–114, doi: 10.1126/
Myers, R.A., and Worm, B., 2003, Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish com-
munities: Nature, v. 423, p. 280–283, doi: 10.1038/nature01610.
Oppenheimer, C., 2003, Climatic, environmental and human consequences of the
largest known historical eruption: Tambora volcano (Indonesia) 1815: Progress
in Physical Geography, v. 27, p. 230–259, doi: 10.1191/0309133303pp379ra.
Orr, J.C., Fabry, V.J., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Doney, S.C., Feely, R.A., Gnanadesikan,
A., Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Key, R.M., Lindsay, K., Maier-Reimer, E.,
Matear, R., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A., Najjar, R.G., Plattner, G.-K., Rodgers,
K.B., Sabine, C.L., Sarmiento, J.L., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R.D., Totterdell, I.J.,
Weirig, M.-F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A., 2005, Anthropogenic ocean acidi-
fication over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms:
Nature, v. 437, p. 681–686, doi: 10.1038/nature04095.
Overpeck, J.T., Otto-Bliesner, B.L., Miller, G.H., Muhs, D.R., Alley, R.B., and Kiehl,
J.T., 2006, Paleoclimatic evidence for future ice-sheet instability and rapid sea-
level rise: Science, v. 311, p. 1747–1750, doi: 10.1126/science.1115159.
Paula, A.H., and Geraldes, M.C., 2003, Holocene Pb isotope chronological standard
curve: A review of the record of the anthropogenic activity in the last 6,000
years: Short Papers—IV South American Symposium on Isotope Geology, p.
Rahmstorf, S., 2007, A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise:
Science, v. 315, p. 368–370, doi: 10.1126/science.1135456.
Riebesell, U., Zondervan, I., Rost, B., Tortell, P.D., Zeebe, R.E., and Morel, M.M.,
2000, Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to increased atmo-
spheric CO2: Nature, v. 407, p. 364–366, doi: 10.1038/35030078.
Rignot, E., and Thomas, R.H., 2002, Mass balance of polar ice sheets: Science, v. 297,
p. 1502–1506, doi: 10.1126/science.1073888.
Ruddiman, W.F., 2003, The anthropogenic Greenhouse Era began thou-
sands of years ago: Climatic Change, v. 61, p. 261–293, doi:
Schneider, S.H., 2004, Abrupt non-linear climate change, irreversibility and surprise:
Global Environmental Change, v. 14, p. 245–258, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.
Speijer, R.P., and Marsi, A.-M.M., 2002, Ostracode turnover and sea-level changes
associated with the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum: Geology, v. 30,
p. 23–26, doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0023:OTASLC>2.0.CO;2.
Speijer, R.P., and Wagner, T., 2002, Sea-level changes and black shales associated with
the late Paleocene thermal maximum: Organic-geochemical and micropaleon-
tologic evidence from the southern Tethyan margin (Egypt-Israel), in Koeberl, C.,
and MacLeod, K.G., eds., Catastrophic Events and Mass Extinctions: Impacts
and Beyond: Geological Society of America Special Paper 356, p. 533–549.
Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P.D., Jaeger, J., Matson, P.A., Moore, B., III, Oldfield,
F., Richardson, K., Schnellnhuber, H.J., Turner, B.L., and Wasson, R.J., 2004,
Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure: Berlin, Springer-
Verlag, 336 p. (See also the executive summary at http://www.igbp.kva.se/
documents/IGBP_ExecSummary.pdf [4.23 MB]).
Syvitski, J.P.M., Vörösmarty, C.J., Kettner, A.J., and Green, P., 2005, Impact of humans
on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean: Science, v. 308,
p. 376–380, doi: 10.1126/science.1109454.
Thomas, C.D., et al., 2004, Extinction risk from climate change: Nature, v. 427,
p. 145–148, doi: 10.1038/nature02121.
Thomas, D.J., Zachos, J.C., Bralower, T.J., Thomas, E., and Bohaty, S., 2002, Warming
the fuel for the fire: Evidence for the thermal dissociation of methane hydrate
during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum: Geology, v. 30, p. 1067–1070,
Tyrrell, T., Shepherd, J.G., and Castle, S., 2007, The long-term legacy of fossil fuels:
Tellus B, v. 59, p. 664–672.
United Nations, 1999, The world at six billion: http://www.un.org/esa/population/
publications/sixbillion/sixbillion.htm (last accessed 30 Nov. 2007).
Wilkinson, B.H., 2005, Humans as geologic agents: A deep-time perspective:
Geology, v. 33, p. 161–164, doi: 10.1130/G21108.1.
Wilson, E.O., 2002, The future of life: New York, Alfred A. Knopf, Random House, 256 p.
Zachos, J.C., Röhl, U., Schellenberg, S.A., Sluijs, A., Hodell, D.A., Kelly, D.C.,
Thomas, E., Nicolo, M., Raffi, I., Lourens, L.J., McCarren, H., and Kroon, D.,
2005, Rapid acidification of the ocean during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal
maximum: Science, v. 308, p. 1611–1615, doi: 10.1126/science.1109004.
Manuscript received 17 October 2007; accepted 6 November