Content uploaded by Paul Posadzki
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Paul Posadzki
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Dietary Supplements, 10(1):29–38, 2013
C
2013 by Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
Available online at www.informahealthcare.com/jds
DOI: 10.3109/19390211.2012.760508
The Efcacy of Irvingia Gabonensis
Supplementation in the Management of
Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review of
Randomized Controlled Trials
Igho Onakpoya, MD, Lucy Davies, PhD, Paul Posadzki, PhD,
& Edzard Ernst,
MD, PhD
Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter,
United Kingdom
ABSTRACT. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence from ran-
domized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the use of the African Bush Mango, Irvingia
gabonensis for body weight reduction in obese and overweight individuals. Electronic
and nonelectronic searches were conducted to identify relevant RCTs. The bibliogra-
phies of located articles were also searched. No age, gender, or language restrictions
were imposed. The reporting quality of identied RCTs was assessed using a method-
ological checklist adapted from the Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials State-
ment and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guide-
lines. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility and assessed the reporting
quality of included studies. Three RCTs were identied, and all were included. The
RCTs all had aws in the reporting of their methodology. All RCTs reported statis-
tically signicant reductions in body weight and waist circumference favoring I. gabo-
nensis over placebo. The results from the RCTs also suggest positive effects of I. gabo-
nensis supplementation on the blood lipid prole. Adverse events included headache
and sleep difculty. Due to the paucity and poor reporting quality of the RCTs, the ef-
fect of I. gabonensis on body weight and related parameters are unproven. Therefore,
I. gabonensis cannot be recommended as a weight loss aid. Future research in this area
should be more rigorous and better reported.
KEYWORDS. Irvingia gabonensis, obesity, overweight, randomized controlled trial,
systematic review
INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of adult obesity has doubled over the last three decades
(Finucane, Stevens, Cowan, Danaei, Lin, & Paciorek, 2011), and hundreds of weight
loss supplements are currently available. However, the efcacy of most of these
Address correspondence to: Igho Onakpoya, MD, Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Uni-
versity of Exeter, United Kingdom. (Email: igho.onakpoya@pcmd.ac.uk)
(Received 22 June 2012; revised 18 September 2012; accepted 17 December 2012)
29
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
30 Onakpoya et al.
supplements is not established. One such supplement is the seed extract of the
African bush mango, Irvingia gabonensis.
I. gabonensis is an herb native to West Africa, and belongs to the Irvingiaceae
family (White & Albernethy, 1996). The eshy fruity part of the African mango is
usually consumed, while the seed is also used in various types of dishes (Okafor
& Okolo, 1996). I. gabonensis reportedly has high ber content, and its seeds con-
tain glycoproteins which can inhibit hydrolysis (Okafor & Okolo, 1996). I. gabo-
nensis has been hypothesized to possess antidiabetic properties due to its ability
to decrease fasting blood sugar levels (Adamson, Okafor, & Abu-Bakare, 1990),
and has also been demonstrated to inhibit adipogenesis in vitro (Oben, Ngondi,
& Blum, 2008). I. gabonensis also reportedly possesses anticholesterol properties
(Tchoundjeu, & Atangana, 2007; Ross, 2011).
I. gabonensis has become popular as a weight loss supplement, and has been
reported in the media as the new “obesity killer” (Benzinga.com, 2011). A recent
review article concluded that I. gabonensis has shown potential benet in causing
weight loss (Egras, Hamilton, Lenz, & Monaghan, 2011). Controlled trials involving
the use of I. gabonensis for body weight reduction are now being conducted, and
results from such trials have recently become available.
The objective of this systematic review is to critically evaluate the evidence for
or against the efcacy of I. gabonensis supplementation in overweight and obese
humans.
METHODS
We conducted electronic searches in the following databases: Medline, Embase,
Amed, and The Cochrane Library. Each database was searched from inception to
April, 2012. The search terms used included antiobesity agent, overweight, obe-
sity, weight loss, slimming, body weight, body fat, adiposity, BMI, I. gabonensis,
bush mango, wild mango, African mango, bread tree, dika nut, and derivatives of
these (a comprehensive search strategy has been included as a supplement to this
manuscript as Figure 1S). We also searched the internet for relevant conference
proceedings and hand searched relevant medical journals, and our own les. The
bibliographies of all located articles were also searched. No age, gender, or lan-
guage restrictions were imposed.
Only randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) were included
in this review. To be considered for inclusion, RCTs had to test the efcacy of
orally administered I. gabonensis-containing supplement for body weight reduction
in overweight (BMI ≥ 25–29.9 kg/m
2
) or obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m
2
) human volun-
teers (World Health Organisation, 2011). Included studies also had to report body
weight or body composition as an outcome measure. Studies were also included ir-
respective of whether or not they incorporated lifestyle modication into the trial
regimen.
Two reviewers (I. Onakpoya and L. Davies) independently assessed the eligibil-
ity of studies. Data were extracted by two reviewers (I. Onakpoya and L. Davies)
according to patient characteristics, interventions, and results. The methodologi-
cal quality of all included studies was assessed by the use of a quality assessment
checklist adapted from the Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials Statement
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
The Efcacy of Irvingia gabonensis Supplementation 31
Records identified through database
searching
(n = 458)
Screening Included
Eligibility
Idenficaon
Additional records identified
through other sources
(n = 0)
No. of duplicates removed
(n = 27)
Records screened
(n = 431)
Records excluded
(n = 428)
Full-text articles assessed
for eligibility
(n = 3)
Full-text articles excluded,
with reasons
(n = 0)
Studies included in
qualitative synthesis
(n = 3)
Studies included in
quantitative synthesis
(meta-analysis)
(n = 0)
FIGURE 1. Flow chart showing the process for the inclusion and analysis of RCTs. The
Flow Diagram has been adapted from the online version of the PRISMA statement, 2009.
Available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org/statement.htm.
(Schulz, Altman, & Moher, 2010) and the Preferred Reporting Items for System-
atic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman,
2009). Disagreements were resolved through discussion.
RESULTS
Our electronic searches identied 431 nonduplicate citations (Figure 1), out of
which 3 eligible trials (Ngondi, Etoundi, Nyangono, Mdofung, & Oben, 2009;
Ngondi, Oben, & Minka, 2005; Oben, Ngondi, Momo, Agbor, & Sobgui, 2008) were
identied, and subsequently included in the review. These RCTs included a total of
208 participants. Key details of these RCTs are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Two
RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al., 2008) were of parallel design, while one
(Ngondi et al., 2005) was cross-over. Participants in all three RCTs were of African
origin.
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
TABLE 1. Reporting Characteristics of I. gabonensis RCTs
First Author
Year Country
Main
Outcome (s)
Main Diagnoses
of Study
Participants
Study
Design
Sex
M/F
Randomization
Appropri-
ate?
Allocation
Con-
cealed?
Sample
Size De-
termined?
Groups
Similar at
Baseline?
Outcome
Assessor
Blinded?
Care
Provider
Blinded?
Patients
Blinded?
Attrition
Bias?
ITT
Analy-
sis?
Modied
Lifestyle?
Ngondi 2009
Cameroon
Body weight,
BMI lipid
prole
Healthy over-
weight/obese
subjects
Parallel 62/58 Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear No Yes
(Ngondi
et al.,
2005)
Cameroon
Body compo-
sition,
body
weight
Healthy over-
weight/obese
subjects
Cross-
over
NR Unclear Unclear Unclear No Unclear Yes Yes Unclear No Yes
(Oben et al.,
2008)
Cameroon
Body compo-
sition,
lipid
prole
Healthy over-
weight/obese
subjects
Parallel 33/39 Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear Yes Yes Unclear Unclear No
Abbreviation: M/F, males/females; NR, not reported.
32
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
TABLE 2. Main Results of I. gabonensis RCTs
First Author
Year
Daily
Dosage and
Formulation
Randomized/
analyzed Age in Years
Baseline Body Weight
(kg)
Treatment
Duration
Main Results on Body
Anthropometry (I.
gabonensis versus Placebo)
Other Metabolic Parameters
(I. gabonensis versus
Placebo) Adverse Events (AE)
Ngondi 2009 150 mg × 2
capsules
120/102 19 to 50 for all
subjects
97.9 ± 9.1 (IG)
96.4 ± 12.3 (PLA)
10 weeks Sig ↓ in BW (12.8 versus
0.7 kg);% BF (6.3 versus
2.0%) and WC (16.2
versus 5.3 cm)
Sig ↓ in serum leptin levels
(16.0 versus 3.0 ng/ml);
LDL-C (22.4 versus
3.8 mg/dL) and CT (39.8
versus 2.8 mg/dL); CRP
(0.8 versus 0.01 mg/L);
FBG (19.3 versus
4.3 mg/dL) and signicant
↑adinopectin (19.4 versus
2.8 mg/L).
Headache, sleep
difculty, atulence
(Ngondi
et al.,
2005)
1,050 mg × 3
capsules
40/40 19 to 55 for all
subjects
105.1 ± 16.98 (IG)
79.43 ± 9.83 (PLA)
4 weeks Sig ↓ in BW (4.1 versus
0.1 kg),
2
WC (6.2 versus
+1.5 cm) and HC (4.5
versus 0.7 cm). No sig diff
in % BF (−0.8 versus
−0.3%)
Sig ↓ in systolic BP (3.6
versus 1.2mmHg). Sig ↑ in
HDL-C in IG
(28.7 mg/dL). Sig ↓ in CT
(84.3 mg/dL) and LDL-C
(55.3 mg/dL), CT/HDL
ratio (2.1), and FBG
(1.2 mmol/L) levels in IG
group.
Not reported
1
Oben et al.,
2008
250 mg × 2
capsule
(IG-CQ)
72/72 21 to 44 for all
subjects
99.79 ± 13.5 (IG)
98.05 ± 12.3 (PLA)
10 weeks Sig ↓ in BW (11.9 versus
2.1 kg), % BF (20.1 versus
4.0%) and WC (21.9 versus
1.0 cm).
Sig ↓in LDL-C (25.8 versus
3.0 mg/dL), CT (44.8
versus 2.2 mg/dL), and
FBG (27.6 versus
2.1 mg/dL).
Headache, sleep
difculty, gas
Abbreviations: IG, Irvingia gabonensis; IG-CQ, Irvingia gabonensis-Cissus quadrangularis combination; PLA, placebo; BW, body weight; % BF, percentage body fat; WC, waist circumference;
HC, hip circumference; CRP, C-reactive protein; FBG, fasting blood glucose; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CT, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
1
Study had three groups of participants; analysis was confined to the IG-CQ and PLA groups.
2
Decrease in waist circumference in I. gabonensis group and an increase in waist circumference in placebo group.
33
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
34 Onakpoya et al.
All RCTs included in the review had aws in the reporting of their methodol-
ogy (Table 1). None of the RCTs reported appropriate randomization or allocation
concealment procedures in their trial, and no RCT reported outcome assessors as
being blinded. Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2005; Oben et al., 2008) reported ade-
quate blinding of both care providers and study participants, while the participants
in one RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005) did not have similar characteristics at baseline.
No RCT reported carrying out a sample size calculation, and none performed an
intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.
Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al., 2008) lasted 10 weeks each, while
the third RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005) lasted 4 weeks. Although one RCT (Ngondi
et al., 2005) was reported as cross-over, the investigators did not report whether
or not there was a wash-out period. The daily dosages of I. gabonensis differed
amongst the three RCTs. This ranged from about 200 mg (Oben et al., 2008) to
about 3,150 mg (Ngondi et al., 2005).
Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al., 2008) reported using a stadiometer
for body weight measurement, while the scale used in the third RCT (Ngondi et al.,
2005) was not specied. All the RCTs estimated body fat composition with bioelec-
tric impedance. All the RCTs also measured waist and hip circumferences by using
a nonstretchable plastic tape on the narrowest and widest part of the trunk.
Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Ngondi et al., 2005) incorporated lifestyle mod-
ication into their trial regimen. While participants in one of these RCTs (Ngondi
et al., 2005) had a restricted daily caloric intake (1,800 kcal), subjects in the other
RCT (Ngondi et al., 2009) had daily caloric intakes ranging from 2,580 to 3,341
kcal. Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Ngondi et al., 2005) had I. gabonensis as sole
intervention, while participants in the intervention group in the third RCT (Oben
et al., 2008) had I. gabonensis in combination with another herbal supplement (Cis-
sus quadrangularis). Generally, subjects in all RCTs were allowed to continue with
their normal level of physical activity.
Because of the small number and poor reporting quality of the included RCTs,
a meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate. The main results of the three RCTs are
discussed here. All RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Ngondi et al., 2005; Oben et al.,
2008) reported statistically signicant reductions in body weight in the I. gabonen-
sis group compared with placebo (12.8 versus 0.7 kg, p < .01; 4.1 versus 0.1 kg, p <
.01; and 11.9 versus 2.1 kg, p < .0001, respectively). Using a 10-week time point,
the weight loss in each of these RCTs translate to >5% from baseline, and sug-
gest clinical signicance (Lau, Douketis, Morrison, Hramiak, Sharma, & Ur, 2006).
Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al., 2008) reported signicant reductions
in percentage body fat in the I. gabonensis group compared with placebo (6.3%
versus 2.0% and 20.1 versus 4.0%, respectively, p < .05 in both studies), while one
study (Ngondi et al., 2005) reported no signicant changes in both I. gabonensis
and placebo groups (−0.8% versus −0.3%).
All RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Ngondi et al., 2005; Oben et al., 2008) reported
statistically signicant changes in waist circumference in the I. gabonensis group
compared with placebo (−16.2 versus −5.3 cm, p < .05; −6.2 versus +5.5 cm, p <
.01; and −21.9 versus −1.0 cm, p < .0001, respectively), and one RCT (Ngondi et al.,
2005) also noted a signicant reduction in hip circumference in the I. gabonensis
group compared with placebo (4.5 versus 0.7 cm, p < .0001).
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
The Efcacy of Irvingia gabonensis Supplementation 35
Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al., 2008) reported statistically sig-
nicant reductions in total cholesterol in the I. gabonensis group compared with
placebo (39.8 versus 2.8 mg/dL, p < .05; and 68.4 versus 7.8 mg/dL, p < .001,
respectively). The third RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005) noted a signicant decrease
(84.3 mg/dL, p < .05) in total cholesterol in the I. gabonensis group without a sig-
nicant change in the placebo group. Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al.,
2008) reported signicant reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol
in the I. gabonensis group compared with placebo (22.4 versus 3.8 mg/dL, p < .01;
and 25.8 versus 3.0 mg/dL, p < .001), while the third RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005) de-
scribed a signicant decrease in LDL cholesterol in the I. gabonensis group (46%;
p < .05) without mentioning the result of between-group differences. One RCT
(Ngondi et al., 2005) reported a signicant increase in high-density lipoprotein
(HDL) cholesterol level in the I. gabonensis group (47%; p < .05), and a signi-
cant decrease in total cholesterol/HDL ratio in the I. gabonensis group (2.1, p <
.05) without a signicant change in the placebo group for these variables.
Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al., 2008) observed statistically signi-
cant reductions in fasting blood glucose levels in the I. gabonensis group compared
with placebo (19.3 versus 4.3 mg/dL, p < .05; and 27.6 versus 2.1 mg/dL, p < .001,
respectively), while the third RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005) reported a signicant de-
crease in fasting blood glucose levels in the I. gabonensis group (32.4%; p < .05)
with a corresponding increase in the placebo group (8.3%); there was no report
on between-group differences. One RCT (Ngondi et al., 2009) noted signicant de-
creases in serum leptin levels in the I. gabonensis group compared with placebo
(16.0 versus 3.0 ng/ml, p < .01), and corresponding signicant increase in serum
adinopectin (19.4 versus 2.8 ng/ml, p < .05). One RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005) demon-
strated a statistically signicant reduction in systolic blood pressure in the I. gabo-
nensis group compared with placebo (3.6 versus 1.2 mmHg, p < .001).
Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al., 2008) reported adverse events
(Table 2). These included headache, sleep difculties, and atulence. In general,
the authors noted that there were no signicant differences in adverse events be-
tween the I. gabonensis and placebo groups. Adverse event reports were lacking in
one RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005). None of the RCTs provided information regard-
ing the compliance of study participants during the intervention period. Eighteen
drop-outs were reported in one RCT (Ngondi et al., 2009); the other RCTs did not
mention information on drop-outs/attrition.
Two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben et al., 2008) reported their sources of fund-
ing. While one of these (Ngondi et al., 2009) was partially funded by the govern-
ment, the other RCT (Oben et al., 2008) was entirely funded by industry.
DISCUSSION
The results of the RCTs included in this review suggest that I. gabonensis supple-
mentation generates statistically signicant reductions in body weight and waist cir-
cumference, compared with placebo. The ndings also indicate that I. gabonensis
supplementation causes markedly positive effects on the blood lipid prole when
compared with placebo. The results of these RCTs should be interpreted with cau-
tion because of deciencies in the reporting of methodology in the included RCTs.
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
36 Onakpoya et al.
I. gabonensis has been reported to have benecial effects on body composition
largely via its action on serum leptin. Leptin regulates energy intake and expendi-
ture by acting as an adiposity signal (Williams, Scott, & Elmquist, 2009), and hu-
man studies have demonstrated that serum leptin levels are positively correlated
with body weight and percentage body fat (Iwamoto, Takeda, Sato, & Matsumoto,
2011). Research in humans has also shown that while serum leptin correlates with
percentage body fat in white populations, same nding was not observed in blacks
(Ruhl et al., 2004). I. gabonensis has been purported to decrease the levels of serum
leptin (Oben et al., 2008; Ngondi et al., 2009), thereby reducing adipose tissue lev-
els. Even though one RCT (Ngondi et al., 2009) reported signicant reductions in
serum leptin due to I. gabonensis supplementation, the hypotheses linking I. gabo-
nensis with reduced serum leptin levels have largely been based on animal studies.
Whether blacks are genetically susceptible to the effects of I. gabonensis on serum
leptin is not clear, and requires further investigation.
A recent animal study has shown that I. gabonensis binds to bile acids in the gut,
thereby causing its fecal elimination (Nangue, Womeni, Mbiapo, Fanni, & Michel,
2011). This study reported signicant increases in HDL cholesterol compared with
placebo, but no signicant differences were observed for LDL cholesterol. The nd-
ings from one of the RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2005) corroborate the result of the animal
study regarding HDL cholesterol. However, in contrast to the ndings from this
study, the RCTs in this review reported signicant effects of I. gabonensis on LDL
cholesterol. Investigations into the mechanism by which this effect was achieved
seem warranted; similarly, it would be interesting to determine whether this mech-
anism differs from that observed in animals.
One RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005) reported a signicant decrease in systolic blood
pressure in the I. gabonensis-supplemented group. However, the therapeutic value
of this decrease seems doubtful. The subjects in the study all had normal systolic
blood pressures (136 mmHg), and a reduction of 3.6 mmHg does not necessarily
indicate clinical relevance. There have been no trials investigating the effects of I.
gabonensis on blood pressure, and no mechanism is known.
Adjustments in lifestyles, such as behavior, diet, and physical activity, are an
important aspect in the management of overweight and obesity (Avenell, Sattar,
& Lean, 2007; Wadden, Butryn, & Wilson, 2007). There were wide discrepancies
in the daily caloric intakes of participants in the two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009;
Ngondi et al., 2005) which reported this variable. Though participants in all the
RCTs were asked to continue with their normal level of physical activity during the
intervention duration, the levels of this activity was not specied. It is unclear the
extent to which these variations in lifestyle adjustment inuenced the outcome of
study results. It is also quite puzzling how participants in one RCT (Ngondi et al.,
2009) though having very high daily caloric intakes, lost a lot of weight during the
trial.
The wide variation in average daily dosages across the three RCTs included in
this review is concerning, as the large differences make it difcult to ascertain the
minimum effective dose of I. gabonensis required to cause a weight loss. Participants
in one RCT (Ngondi et al., 2005) received >10 times the daily dosages of I. gabonen-
sis compared with the subjects in the other two RCTs (Ngondi et al., 2009; Oben
et al., 2008), but the weight loss in all the RCTs was comparable (approximately
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
The Efcacy of Irvingia gabonensis Supplementation 37
4 kg weekly). Similar ndings were also reported for fasting blood sugar and blood
lipid prole variables across the studies.
The variety in study methodology (in relation to both reporting quality and de-
sign), small sample sizes, variation in dosages, and the generally short duration of
the intervention period limit the extent to which efcacy or otherwise can be in-
ferred, and lack of detailed reporting creates doubts regarding the internal and ex-
ternal validity of the included studies (Schulz et al., 2010; Moher et al., 2009; Wittes,
2002). The demographic characteristics of the study participants also conne the
ndings of the results to individuals of black African descent. Furthermore, all the
RCTs have been conducted by a small group of investigators from the same geo-
graphical area, and published in the same journal. Larger and more independent
trials, which also involve volunteers from other racial backgrounds, are necessary
to allow for a broader and more objective evaluation of the effects of I. gabonensis.
Though the RCTs did not report any signicant differences in adverse events
between the I. gabonensis and placebo groups, this does not conclusively imply that
I. gabonensis supplementation is entirely risk free. Future trials should be longer,
and large postmarketing surveillance studies would be valuable for determining the
safety of I. gabonensis (Ioannidis, Evans, & Gøtzsche, 2004).
This systematic review has several limitations. Though we searched both elec-
tronic and nonelectronic sources, we may not have identied all RCTs involving
the use of I. gabonensis, especially unpublished trials, if any. Furthermore, the poor
quality of RCTs prevents us from making rm conclusions about the effects of I.
gabonensis on body composition.
CONCLUSION
The results from available RCTs suggest that I. gabonensis supplementation causes
signicant reductions in body weight and waist circumference. However, the report-
ing of the methodology of the RCTs is poor and all the trials are of short duration.
Until good quality trials demonstrating its efcacy are available, I. gabonensis can-
not be recommended as a weight loss aid. Future trials of this supplement should
be more rigorous and better reported.
Declaration of interest: I. Onakpoya was funded by a grant from GlaxoSmithk-
line.
REFERENCES
Adamson I, Okafor C, Abu-Bakare A. A supplement of Dikanut (Irvingia gabonensis) improves
treatment of type II diabetics. West Afr J Med. 1990;9(2):108–115.
Avenell A, Sattar N, Lean M. Management: Part I-Behaviour change, diet, and activity. In:
Sattar N and Lean M. (Eds.), ABC of obesity, pp. 8–11. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell
Publishing Ltd, 2007.
Benzinga.com/news. New African Mango ‘Obesity Killer’...As Seen on “The Dr. Oz Show” and
Fox News. Available from: http://ww.bezinga.com/press- releases/11/02/p860599/new-african-
mango-obesity-killer-as-seen-on-the-dr-oz-show-and-fox-news. [Accessed 15/02/2011].
Egras AM, Hamilton WR, Lenz TL, Monaghan MS. An evidence-based review of fat modifying
supplemental weight loss products. J Obes. 2011;2011. pii: 297315. doi: 10.1155/2011/297315.
Epub 2010 Aug 10.
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.
38 Onakpoya et al.
Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional
and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: a systematic analysis of health examina-
tion surveys and epidemiological studies with 960-country years and 9.1 million participants.
Lancet. 2011 Feb 12;377(9765):557–67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Ioannidis JP, Evans SJ, Gøtzsche PC, O’Neill RT, Altman DG, Schulz K, et al. Better reporting
of harms in randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:781–788.
Iwamoto J, Takeda T, Sato Y, Matsumoto H. Serum Leptin concentration positively correlates
with body weight and total fat mass in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoarthritis
of the knee. Arthritis. 2011;2011:580632. doi: 10.1155/2011/580632. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
Lau DC, Douketis JD, Morrison KM, Hramiak IM, Sharma AM, Ur E. 2006 Canadian clini-
cal practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children
[summary]. CMAJ. 2007;176:S1–S13.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, and the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting
items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med.
2009;151(4):264–269.
Nangue TJ, Womeni HM, Mbiapo FT, Fanni J, Michel L. Irvingia gabonensis fat: nutritional
properties and effect of increasing amounts on the growth and lipid metabolism of young rats
wistar sp. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:43.
Ngondi JL, Etoundi BC, Nyangono CB, Mdofung CMF, Oben JE. IGOB131, a novel seed extract
of the West African plant Irvingia gabonensis, signicantly reduces body weight and improves
metabolic parameters in overweight humans in a randomized double-blind placebo controlled
investigation. Lipids Health Dis. 2009;8:7.
Ngondi JL, Oben JE, Minka SR. The effect of Irvingia gabonensis seeds on body weight and
blood lipids of obese subjects in Cameroon. Lipids Health Dis. 2005;4:12.
Oben J, Ngondi JL, Blum K. Inhibition of Irvingia gabonensis seed extract (OB 131) on adipo-
genesis as mediated via down regulation of PPAR and Leptin genes and up-regulation of the
adiponectin gene. Lipids Health Dis. 2008;7:44.
Oben JE, Ngondi JL, Momo CN, Agbor GA, Sobgui CSM. The use of a Cissus quadran-
gularis/Irvingia gabonensis combination in the management of weight loss: a double-blind
placebo-controlled study. Lipids Health Dis. 2008;7:12.
Okafor J, Okolo HC. Potentials of some indigenous fruit trees of Nigeria. Paper presented at the
5th Annual Conference of the Forestry Association of Nigeria 1996, Jos: 60–71.
Ross SM. African mango (IGOB131): a proprietary seed extract of Irvingia gabonensis is found
to be effective in reducing body weight and improving metabolic parameters in overweight
humans. Holist Nurs Pract. 2011;25(4):215–217.
Ruhl CE, Everhart JE, Ding J, Goodpaster PH, Kanaya AM, Simonsick RM, Tylavsky LA, Har-
ris TB for the Health. Aging and body composition study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(3):576–
583.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 State-
ment: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials. PloS Med.
2010;7(3):e1000251.
Tchoundjeu Z, and Atangana AR. Irvingia gabonensis (Aubry-Lecomte ex O’Rorke) Baill. [In-
ternet] Record from Protabase. In: van der Vossen HAM and Mkamilo G.S. (Eds.), PROTA
(Plant resources of tropical africa/ressources v
´
eg
´
etales de l’afrique tropicale). Netherlands: Wa-
geningen, 2007, Available from: http://database.prota.org/search.htm. [Accessed 7 Feb., 2011].
Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Wilson C. Lifestyle Modication for the Management of Obesity. Gas-
troentorology. 2007;133(1):2226–2238.
White L, Albernethy K. Guide de la vegetation de la reserve de la Lop
´
e, Gabon. ECOFAC. 1996,
Gabon.
Williams KW, Scott MM, Elmquist JK. From observation to experimentation: leptin action in the
mediobasal hypothalamus. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(suppl):985S–990S.
Wittes J. Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials. Epidemiol Rev.
2002;24(1):39–53.
World Health Organisation, Mar. 2011. Obesity and Overweight Fact sheet No 311. Available
from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheet. [Accessed 30 Jan., 2012].
J Dietary Suppl Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Oxford on 02/19/13
For personal use only.