Content uploaded by Xiaoyong Du
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Xiaoyong Du on Dec 31, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Small
Ruminant
Research
105 (2012) 114–
116
Contents
lists
available
at
SciVerse
ScienceDirect
Small
Ruminant
Research
jou
rnal
h
omepa
g
e:
www.elsevier.com/locate/smallrumres
Short
communication
A
whole-genome
radiation
hybrid
panel
for
goat
X.Y.
Dua,
J.E.
Womackb,
K.E.
Owensb,
J.S.
Elliottb,
B.
Sayrec,
P.J.
Bottcherd,
D.
Milane,
M.
Garcia
Podestaf,
S.H.
Zhaoa,∗,
M.
Malekf,∗∗
aDepartment
of
Animal
Science
and
Technology,
Huazhong
Agricultural
University,
Wuhan
430070,
PR
China
bDepartment
of
Veterinary
Pathobiology,
College
of
Veterinary
Medicine,
Texas
A&M
University,
College
Station,
TX
77843,
USA
cDepartment
of
Biology,
Virginia
State
University,
Petersburg,
VA
23830,
USA
dAnimal
Production
and
Health
Division,
Food
and
Agriculture
Organization
of
the
United
Nations,
00153
Rome,
Italy
eToulouse,
INRA,
FR
(INRA),
Laboratoire
de
Génétique
Cellulaire
and
Biométrie
et
Intelligence
Artificielle,
Castanet-Tolosan,
France
fFAO/IAEA
Agriculture
and
Biotechnology
Laboratory,
Department
of
Nuclear
Sciences
and
Applications,
International
Atomic
Energy
Agency,
Wagramer
Strasse
5,
P.O.
Box
100,
A-1400,
Austria
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Article
history:
Received
23
July
2011
Received
in
revised
form
28
November
2011
Accepted
29
November
2011
Available online 21 April 2012
Keywords:
Radiation
hybrid
panel
Goat
Gene
mapping
CHRH5000
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
A
5000
rad
goat–hamster
panel
of
121
whole-genome
radiation
hybrids
was
generated
and
preliminarily
characterized.
A
normal
diploid
fibroblast
culture
from
a
male
Boer
goat
was
fused
with
a
recipient
thymidine
kinase-deficient
hamster
cell
line.
The
generated
121
radi-
ation
hybrids
were
grown
and
produced
an
average
of
8.4
mg
of
DNA
per
radiation
hybrid.
A
SINE-PCR
test
showed
that
almost
all
radiation
hybrids
retained
goat
DNA.
The
retention
fre-
quencies
of
the
121
hybrids
were
preliminarily
estimated
using
a
collection
of
42
unlinked
molecular
markers.
An
optimized
panel
of
therein
90
radiation
hybrids
(CHRH5000)
with
an
average
retention
frequency
of
34.2%
was
screened
on
the
basis
of
interspersed
repeti-
tive
DNA
content
and
chromosome
retention
frequency.
The
development
of
this
WG-RH
panel
will
provide
a
fundamental
tool
for
advanced
goat
genome
mapping
studies
and
for
mammalian
comparative
mapping.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
The
goat
(Capra
hircus)
is
an
important
agricultural
species
with
centuries
of
phenotypic
observations,
trait
selection,
and
breed
differentiation.
Of
the
world’s
870
mil-
lion
goats
estimated,
95%
are
found
in
developing
countries
(FAO,
1997)
where
they
provide
reliable
access
to
meat,
milk,
skins,
and
fiber
for
the
livelihood
of
low
input
produc-
tion
systems.
However,
the
understanding
of
the
goat
at
the
genomic
level
lags
behind
other
livestock
species,
such
as
cattle,
pigs,
chickens,
and
sheep.
The
most
recent
genetic
and
cytogenetic
maps
in
the
goat
were
published
more
than
one
decade
ago
(Vaiman
et
al.,
1996;
Schibler
et
al.,
1998),
∗Corresponding
author.
Tel.:
+86
27
87284161;
fax:
+86
27
87280408.
∗∗ Corresponding
author.
Tel:
+431
2600
28358;
fax:
+431
2600
28222.
E-mail
addresses:
shzhao@mail.hzau.edu.cn
(S.H.
Zhao),
memalek@yahoo.com
(M.
Malek).
but
lacks
the
resolution
that
is
possible
for
ordering
mark-
ers
with
radiation
hybrid
(RH)
panels
(Cox
et
al.,
1990;
Faraut
et
al.,
2009).
Currently,
the
‘first-generation’
RH
panels
were
built
for
producing
whole-genome
maps
for
several
farm
animals,
e.g.,
cattle
(Womack
et
al.,
1997),
pigs
(Yerle
et
al.,
1998),
river
buffalo
(Amaral
et
al.,
2007)
and
sheep
(Wu
et
al.,
2007).
This
study
specifically
involves
the
development
of
a
tool,
WG-RH
panel,
for
high-resolution
mapping
of
the
goat
genome.
2.
Materials
and
methods
2.1.
Generation
of
Capra
hircus
radiation
hybrid
panel
The
construction
of
Capra
hircus
radiation
hybrid
panel
followed
the
protocols
well
developed
by
Womack
et
al.
(1997)
and
is
briefly
described
as
follow.
Skin
biopsies
were
obtained
from
one
adult
Boer
male
from
which
we
cultured
fibroblasts
and
performed
karyotypic
analysis.
Approx-
imately
108cells
were
irradiated
with
a
cobalt
60
source
for
a
total
dose
of
5000
rad.
The
donor
goat
fibroblast
cells
were
fused
with
the
0921-4488/$
–
see
front
matter ©
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.11.023
X.Y.
Du
et
al.
/
Small
Ruminant
Research
105 (2012) 114–
116 115
Table
1
The
information
of
markers
were
typed
on
the
121
hamster-goat
radiation
hybrids.
Marker
Type
Chromosome
Retention
frequency
(%)
Reference
CSSM19 STS
CHI1q43
40
Vaiman
et
al.
(1996)
SOD1
Gene
CHI1q12.2
56
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
MYL1
Gene
CHI2q41
32
Di
Meo
et
al.
(2006)
BMS2782
STS
CHI2q22-q23
26
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
CSSM54 STS CHI3q22 45 Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
8-16R EST CHI3q37 51 Le
Provost
et
al.
(2000)
TGL159 STS
CHI4q34
37
Schibler
et
al.,
1998
TRG2
gene
CHI4q22
41
Antonacci
et
al.
(2007)
OarFCB005 STS
CHI5q21
46
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
2-21revR
EST
CHI5q31
54
Le
Provost
et
al.
(2000)
GNRHR
gene
CHI6q31
39
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
BM1329
STS
CHI6q15
42
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
SLC27A1
gene
CHI7q11–12
36
Ordovas
et
al.
(2005)
BMS522
STS
CHI7q26
40
Tabet-Aoul
et
al.
(2000)
18-12rev EST CHI8q26 64 Le
Provost
et
al.
(2000)
TGLA010
STS
CHI8q15
41
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
INRA127 STS
CHI9q13
49
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
BM4208
STS
CHI9q25–26
40
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
BMS528
STS
CHI10q13
52
Tabet-Aoul
et
al.
(2000)
MCM185 STS CHI10q35 49 Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
ILSTS028
STS
CHI11q27–28
47
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
TGFA gene CHI11q13–14
49
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
SRCRSP09
STS
CHI12q22
50
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
SRCRSP01
STS
CHI13
41
Vaiman
et
al.
(1996)
ILSTS008
STS
CHI14q19
50
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
LSCV05
STS
CHI15q25
39
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
BMS538 STS CHI16q15 47 Tabet-Aoul
et
al.
(2000)
OarFCB48
STS
CHI17q15
52
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
INRA063 STS
CHI18q22
40
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
BMS0745
STS
CHI19q13
45
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
TGLA304
STS
CHI20q13.3
53
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
SRCRS5
STS
CHI21q14
45
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
LSCV14
STS
CHI22q24
46
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
OarCP73 STS CHI23q13
56
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
ILSTS65
STS
CHI24q21
53
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
BM4005 STS
CHI25q14
47
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
LSCV52
STS
CHI26q21
45
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
LSCV40
STS
CHI27q14
53
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
RBP3
gene
CHI28q19
49
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
OPCML
gene
CHI29q22
54
Schibler
et
al.
(1998)
XBM31 STS CHIXp12 45 Piumi
et
al.
(1998)
McM74
STS
CHIXq11
46
Piumi
et
al.
(1998)
recipient
hamster
A23
cells
(kindly
provided
by
David
Cox,
Stanford
Uni-
versity)
to
generate
goat–hamster
radiation
hybrids.
Each
hybrid
was
grown
to
confluent
cultures
in
two
900
cm2roller
bottles
to
produce
the
final
harvest.
DNA
extractions
from
cell
pellets
were
performed
by
phenol/chloroform/isoamyl
alcohol
protocol.
2.2.
Selection
of
molecular
markers
A
SINE-PCR
test
was
performed
in
each
clone
to
for
the
presence
of
goat
DNA.
One
primer
pair
(Forward:
5-CTGCAGCACGCCAGGACTTC;
Reverse:
5-AGCTCCGAGACTTTGGCCAC)
was
designed
according
to
a
goat
PstI
(Sheikh
et
al.,
2002)
SINE
sequence
(Accession
Number
X71732)
with
online
Primer
3.
The
retention
frequencies
of
the
radiation
hybrids
were
estimated
using
a
collection
of
unlinked
markers.
Initially
50
markers
including
goat
STS,
ESTs,
and
coding
genes
were
selected
according
to
their
expected
positions
on
all
29
goat
autosomes
and
Chromosome
X.
At
least
two
markers
at
large
intervals
on
the
larger
chromosomes
(Chromosome
1
to
11
and
Chromosome
X)
and
one
maker
for
the
other
chromosome
were
chosen.
These
markers
were
derived
from
the
integrated
cytogenetic
map
(Schibler
et
al.,
1998)
or
marker
assignment
studies
by
FISH
(Vaiman
et
al.,
1996;
Piumi
et
al.,
1998;
Le
Provost
et
al.,
2000;
Tabet-Aoul
et
al.,
2000;
Ordovas
et
al.,
2005;
Di
Meo
et
al.,
2006;
Antonacci
et
al.,
2007)
in
goat.
2.3.
Polymerase
chain
reaction
(PCR)
Markers
were
genotyped
on
DNA
of
the
obtained
radiation
hybrids
together
with
goat
and
hamster
control
DNA
by
PCR.
The
10
L
PCR
cocktail
contained
50
ng
DNA;
1.5
mM
MgCl2;
10
mM
Tris–HCl;
50
mM
KCl;
0.2
mM
dGTP,
dTTP,
dATP
and
dCTP;
10
pmol
each
primer
and
0.5
U
Taq
DNA
polymerase
(Applied
Biosystems).
PCR
reactions
were
performed
in
the
following
conditions:
94 ◦C
for
10
min;
35
cycles
of
94 ◦C
for
30
s,
51–63 ◦C
for
30
s
and
72 ◦C
for
30
s;
a
final
5
min
extension
at
72 ◦C.
PCR
products
were
separated
by
electrophoresis
on
2.0%
agarose
gels
and
scored
manually.
3.
Results
and
discussion
3.1.
Generation
of
Capra
hircus
radiation
hybrid
panel
The
karyotypic
analysis
showed
our
goat
sample
has
normal
chromosome
structure.
The
fusion
of
the
donor
goat
fibroblast
cells
with
the
recipient,
A23
generated
130
radi-
ation
hybrids
totally.
121
of
these
130
radiation
hybrids
were
grown
to
confluent
cultures
produced
an
average
of
8.4
mg
of
DNA
for
each
radiation
hybrid.
The
hybrid
DNA
harvest
ranged
from
18.5
to
2.4
mg,
sufficient
for
an
estimated
81,000
PCR
reactions,
assuming
50
ng
per
reac-
tion.
The
SINE-PCR
test
showed
that
All
of
121
RH
colonies
except
one
demonstrated
strong
amplification,
suggesting
retention
of
goat
chromosomes.
116 X.Y.
Du
et
al.
/
Small
Ruminant
Research
105 (2012) 114–
116
3.2.
Preliminary
characterization
of
the
radiation
hybrid
panel
Of
50
molecular
markers
we
selected,
42
(Table
1)
were
suitable
for
PCR
screening.
Using
the
genotype
of
these
markers
on
the
radiation
hybrids,
we
calculated
the
reten-
tion
frequencies
for
each
hybrid.
Among
the
121
hybrids
produced,
3
had
a
genome
retention
frequency
<
9%
(1–2
marker
retained/42),
90
ranged
between
9.5%
and
71.4%
(3–30
markers
retained/42),
and
18
hybrids
represented
the
frequency
>71.4%
(31–42
markers
retained/42).
Some
previous
simulation
studies
suggested
that
a
retention
frequency
of
50%
would
be
optimal
for
ordering
mark-
ers
(Lunetta
and
Boehnke,
1994;
Lunetta
et
al.,
1996).
To
optimizing
the
genome
coverage,
we
selected
a
subset
of
90
radiation
hybrids
with
moderate
retention
frequencies
(9.5–71.4%)
as
a
final
panel
(Capra
hircus
radiation
hybrid
Panel,
CHRH5000)
for
advanced
mapping
studies.
The
aver-
age
frequency
of
CHRH5000
was
34.2%
based
on
these
42
markers,
and
was
comparable
to
that
for
other
domestic
animals,
i.e.,
28%
in
BovR5
for
cattle
(Womack
et
al.,
1997),
25%
in
USUoRH5000
for
sheep
(Wu
et
al.,
2007),
27.3%
in
BBURH5000
for
river
buffalo
(Amaral
et
al.,
2008).
4.
Conclusion
WG-RH
panels
have
proven
to
be
highly
efficient
tools
for
mapping
genes
and
comparing
genome
architecture.
Our
study
developed
a
fundamental
tool
for
genomic
research
in
the
goat.
Dense
maps
of
over
1000
SNP
mark-
ers
on
chromosome
1
have
been
constructing
for
goat
(data
unpublished).
Because
the
goat
has
adapted
to
virtually
every
type
of
environment
and
have
many
biomedical
con-
ditions
similar
to
humans
and
other
ruminants,
this
will
be
also
a
valuable
resource
for
comparative
genomic
analysis
and
for
eventual
assembly
of
the
goat
sequence.
Acknowledgements
This
research
was
supported
by
the
IAEA’s
Coordinated
Research
Project,
The
project
of
China
Scholarship
Coun-
cil,
and
the
creative
team
project
of
Education
Ministry
of
China.
References
Amaral,
M.E.,
Grant,
J.R.,
Riggs,
P.K.,
Stafuzza,
N.B.,
Filho,
E.A.,
Goldammer,
T.,
Weikard,
R.,
Brunner,
R.M.,
Kochan,
K.J.,
Greco,
A.J.,
Jeong,
J.,
Cai,
Z.,
Lin,
G.,
Prasad,
A.,
Kumar,
S.,
Saradhi,
G.P.,
Mathew,
B.,
Kumar,
M.A.,
Miziara,
M.N.,
Mariani,
P.,
Caetano,
A.R.,
Galvao,
S.R.,
Tantia,
M.S.,
Vijh,
R.K.,
Mishra,
B.,
Kumar,
S.T.,
Pelai,
V.A.,
Santana,
A.M.,
Fornitano,
L.C.,
Jones,
B.C.,
Tonhati,
H.,
Moore,
S.,
Stothard,
P.,
Womack,
J.E.,
2008.
A
first
generation
whole
genome
RH
map
of
the
river
buffalo
with
comparison
to
domestic
cattle.
BMC
Genomics
9,
631.
Amaral,
M.E.,
Owens,
K.E.,
Elliott,
J.S.,
Fickey,
C.,
Schaffer,
A.A.,
Agarwala,
R.,
Womack,
J.E.,
2007.
Construction
of
a
river
buffalo
(Bubalus
bubalis)
whole-genome
radiation
hybrid
panel
and
preliminary
RH
mapping
of
chromosomes
3
and
10.
Anim.
Genet.
38,
311–314.
Antonacci,
R.,
Vaccarelli,
G.,
Di
Meo,
G.P.,
Piccinni,
B.,
Miccoli,
M.C.,
Cribiu,
E.P.,
Perucatti,
A.,
Iannuzzi,
L.,
Ciccarese,
S.,
2007.
Molecular
in
situ
hybridization
analysis
of
sheep
and
goat
BAC
clones
identifies
the
transcriptional
orientation
of
T
cell
receptor
gamma
genes
on
chro-
mosome
4
in
bovids.
Vet.
Res.
Commun.
31,
977–983.
Cox,
D.R.,
Burmeister,
M.,
Price,
E.R.,
Kim,
S.,
Myers,
R.M.,
1990.
Radiation
hybrid
mapping:
a
somatic
cell
genetic
method
for
constructing
high-
resolution
maps
of
mammalian
chromosomes.
Science
250,
245–250.
Di
Meo,
G.P.,
Gallagher,
D.,
Perucatti,
A.,
Wu,
X.,
Incarnato,
D.,
Mohammadi,
G.,
Taylor,
J.F.,
Iannuzzi,
L.,
2006.
Mapping
of
11
genes
by
FISH
to
BTA2,
BBU2q,
OAR2q
and
CHI2,
and
comparison
with
HSA2q.
Anim.
Genet.
37,
299–300.
FAO,
1997.
In:
Bouwman,
A.F.
(Ed.),
Long-Term
Scenarios
of
Livestock-
Crop-Land
Use
Interactions
in
Developing
Countries.
FAO,
Rome,
http://www.fao.org/docrep/w5146e/w5146e00.htm#Contents.
Faraut,
T.,
de
Givry,
S.,
Hitte,
C.,
Lahbib-Mansais,
Y.,
Morisson,
M.,
Milan,
D.,
Schiex,
T.,
Servin,
B.,
Vignal,
A.,
Galibert,
F.,
Yerle,
M.,
2009.
Contri-
bution
of
radiation
hybrids
to
genome
mapping
in
domestic
animals.
Cytogenet.
Genome
Res.
126,
21–33.
Le
Provost,
F.,
Schibler,
L.,
Oustry-Vaiman,
A.,
Martin,
P.,
Cribiu,
E.P.,
2000.
Cytogenetic
mapping
of
25
goat
mammary
gland
expressed
sequence
tags
(ESTs).
Genet.
Sel.
Evol.
32,
311–320.
Lunetta,
K.L.,
Boehnke,
M.,
1994.
Multipoint
radiation
hybrid
mapping:
comparison
of
methods,
sample
size
requirements,
and
optimal
study
characteristics.
Genomics
21,
92–103.
Lunetta,
K.L.,
Boehnke,
M.,
Lange,
K.,
Cox,
D.R.,
1996.
Selected
locus
and
multiple
panel
models
for
radiation
hybrid
mapping.
Am.
J.
Hum.
Genet.
59,
717–725.
Ordovas,
L.,
Roy,
R.,
Zaragoza,
P.,
Hayes,
H.,
Eggen,
A.,
Rodellar,
C.,
2005.
Assignment
of
the
solute
carrier
family
27
member
1
(SLC27A1)
gene
to
bovine
chromosome
7.
Anim.
Genet.
36,
352–353.
Piumi,
F.,
Schibler,
L.,
Vaiman,
D.,
Oustry,
A.,
Cribiu,
E.P.,
1998.
Comparative
cytogenetic
mapping
reveals
chromosome
rearrangements
between
the
X
chromosomes
of
two
closely
related
mammalian
species
(cattle
and
goats).
Cytogenet.
Cell
Genet.
81,
36–41.
Schibler,
L.,
Vaiman,
D.,
Oustry,
A.,
Giraud-Delville,
C.,
Cribiu,
E.P.,
1998.
Comparative
gene
mapping:
a
fine-scale
survey
of
chromosome
rearrangements
between
ruminants
and
humans.
Genome
Res.
8,
901–915.
Sheikh,
F.G.,
Mukhopadhyay,
S.S.,
Gupta,
P.,
2002.
Pstl
repeat:
a
family
of
short
interspersed
nucleotide
element
(SINE)-like
sequences
in
the
genomes
of
cattle,
goat,
and
buffalo.
Genome
45,
44–50.
Tabet-Aoul,
K.,
Oustry-Vaiman,
A.,
Vaiman,
D.,
Saïdi-Mehtar,
N.,
Cribiu,
E.P.,
Lantier,
F.,
2000.
Cytogenetical
anchoring
of
sheep
linkage
map
and
syntenic
groups
using
a
sheep
BAC
library.
Genet.
Sel.
Evol.
32,
441–457.
Vaiman,
D.,
Schibler,
L.,
Bourgeois,
F.,
Oustry,
A.,
Amigues,
Y.,
Cribiu,
E.P.,
1996.
A
genetic
linkage
map
of
the
male
goat
genome.
Genetics
144,
279–305.
Womack,
J.E.,
Johnson,
J.S.,
Owens,
E.K.,
Rexroad
3rd,
C.E.,
Schlapfer,
J.,
Yang,
Y.P.,
1997.
A
whole-genome
radiation
hybrid
panel
for
bovine
gene
mapping.
Mamm.
Genome
8,
854–856.
Wu,
C.H.,
Nomura,
K.,
Goldammer,
T.,
Hadfield,
T.,
Womack,
J.E.,
Cock-
ett,
N.E.,
2007.
An
ovine
whole-genome
radiation
hybrid
panel
used
to
construct
an
RH
map
of
ovine
chromosome
9.
Anim.
Genet.
38,
534–536.
Yerle,
M.,
Pinton,
P.,
Robic,
A.,
Alfonso,
A.,
Palvadeau,
Y.,
Delcros,
C.,
Hawken,
R.L.A.C.B.,
Schook,
L.,
Milan,
D.,
Gellin,
J.,
1998.
Construction
of
a
whole-genome
radiation
hybrid
panel
for
high-resolution
gene
mapping
in
pigs.
Cytogenet.
Cell
Genet.
82,
182–188.