With or without intent: How racial disparities prevent implementation of care

Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Center for Global Health Systems, Management, and Policy, 3139 Research Blvd., Suite 205, Kettering, OH 45420, USA.
The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging (Impact Factor: 3). 01/2009; 12(10):770S-775S. DOI: 10.1007/BF03028628
Source: PubMed


The limited affects of translation within the United States remains a central issue for the medical profession. Racial disparities are noted as a significant factor contributing to this problem.
This pilot study sought to explore how racial barriers limit the effective implementation of health care by examining the barriers that affect health care among African-Americans in Dayton, Ohio through their expression of experiences on the subject.
This qualitative study relied on the focus group method to accomplish its objective. Both African-American (Black) and White (non-Hispanic White) individuals were invited to participate in the focus group to facilitate comparison between the experiences of the two groups and identify experiences that are uniquely African-American. Of the 18 individuals who participated in the study, 16 were African-American and 2 were White. Participants were selected using the purposive sampling method which drew participants from a list of individuals who had received health services from a public health clinic in Dayton, Ohio, and who had not returned for care during a 12-18 month period prior to their participation in the study. These participants represent some of the most vulnerable members of US society when it comes to access to health care. The focus group conversation was audio taped, recorded on flip charts, and transcribed by an observer to ensure data accuracy. Focus group participants had immediate access to the flip chart notes and were asked to correct inaccurate recordings. The data was analyzed using the grounded theory approach.
According to participants, the key barriers they experienced to effective health care were economic factors; the quality of care they received and the disrespect of medical practitioners; accessibility to health services based on location, cost, and decentralized services; lower literacy and education levels; and cultural differences and the related factors of discrimination and racism embedded in the health system.
This study suggests that without addressing racial, cultural and ethnic disparities in health care, efforts at translation will continue to be thwarted. Moreover, physicians' efforts at translation must be matched by changes to the institutional arrangements within health care systems.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard Joel Schuster, Feb 17, 2015
  • Source
    • "However it is concerning that although refugees to the City of Calgary show very low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels [8], recent immigrants in general are less likely to be tested. One possible explanation for this is that it represents a racial disparity in health care delivery [20-23]. Alternatively it may simply reflect a lack of access to family physicians for new arrivals to the City of Calgary. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increasing laboratory test utilization is a major challenge facing clinical laboratories. However, in most instances we lack population level information on the patient groups to which increased testing is directed. Much recent work has been published on the sociodemographic correlates of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency. An unanswered question, however, is whether testing is preferentially directed towards individuals with a higher likelihood of deficiency. In this paper we examine this question by combining laboratory information system data on testing rates with Census Canada data. We examined 1,436 census dissemination areas within the city of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. For each census dissemination area we determined age and sex-specific 25-hydroxyvitamin D testing rates over a one year period. We then compared these testing rates with the following sociodemographic variables obtained from Census Canada: first nations status, education level, household income, visible minority status, and recent immigrant status. Overall, 6.9% of males in the city of Calgary were tested during the study period. Females were 1.7 times more likely to be tested than males. Testing rate increased with increasing age, with 16.8% of individuals 66 years and over tested during the one-year study period. Individuals having at least some university education were less likely to be tested (RR = 0.60; p < 0.0001). Interestingly, although visible minorities were over twice as likely to be tested as compared to non-visual minorities (RR = 2.25; p < 0.0001), recent immigrants, a group known to exhibit low 25 hydroxyvitamin D levels, were significantly less likely to be tested than non-recent immigrants (RR = 0.72; p = 0.0174). While median household income was modestly associated with increased testing (RR = 1.02; p < 0.0001), First Nations status and non-English speaking were not significant predictors of 25-hydroxyvitamin D testing. Testing for 25-hydroxyvitamin D is in part directed toward populations at higher risk of deficiency (visible minorities) and at higher risk of osteoporosis (older females), but a particularly high risk group (recent immigrants) is being tested at a lower rate than other patient groups.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2014 · BMC Health Services Research
  • Source
    • "s, Chilton et al. 2006; Kawahara, Masui et al. 2010) Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide with mortality rates spiking in low-and middle-income countries.(Linkov, Padilla et al. 2010) Medical care alone cannot adequately improve health related quality of life or reduce cancer disparities without also addressing where and how people live.(Subban, Terwoord et al. 2008) As countries become more culturally diverse, taking action to train the future cancer workforce to better serve their changing communities is a top priority. (Dogra, Reitmanova et al. 2010) Public & private health systems need to move beyond identifying problems to development of novel interventions and their implementation. Additional"

    Full-text · Chapter · Apr 2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiovascular risk factor management by French vs US primary care physicians was studied. A survey was conducted that found that French physicians spend >20 minutes while US physicians spend five to 10 minutes (P<.001) addressing cardiovascular risk with patients. Fifty-three percent of French (vs 33% of US) physicians focus more on lifestyle modification and less on medication management (P<.0001). Sixty-nine percent of French physicians spend 0% to 20% of their time on administration while 65% of US physicians spend 10% to 30% (P=.0028). Fifty-one percent of French physicians see patients in one to three months for follow-up, while 51% of US physicians see patients in three to six months (P<.0001). Eighty-seven percent of French (vs 39% of US) physicians have guidelines available in the examination room either frequently or very frequently. US physicians report disparities in care more frequently than do French physicians (P<.0001). Forty-nine percent of French (vs 10% of US) physicians believe that they have relative freedom to practice medicine (P<.001). US physicians report greater administrative efforts, frustration, and disparities in their practice. French physicians focus more of their efforts on lifestyle management and see their patients more frequently and for a longer visit time.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2011 · Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Show more