Commercially available lipid formulations of amphotericin B: Are they bioequivalent and therapeutically equivalent?

School of Pharmacy, Pharmacology Unit, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Acta bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis 08/2012; 83(2):154-63.
Source: PubMed


Amphotericin B is a polyene macrolide derived from Streptomyces nodosus. Introduced into therapy in 1957, for decades amphotericin B has been the "gold standard" for fighting systemic fungal infections. In order to facilitate its systemic use, much attention has been paid to the development of pharmaceutical forms that could reduce its toxicity, especially for the kidney. Because of its low solubility in water and excellent solubility in lipids, amphotericin B is an ideal candidate for lipid-based formulations. Three different lipid formulations for intravenous infusion are currently commercially available: liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome), Amphotericin lipid complex (Abelcet) and Amphotericin colloidal dispersion (Amphocil). The three lipid formulations of amphotericin B show significantly different structural, physical, chemical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicological characteristics. Several lines of evidence indicate that the three formulations of amphotericin B are not therapeutically equivalent. First, they are not bioequivalent. Second, even though a complete picture of controlled clinical research designed to compare effectiveness and safety of the three lipid formulations is not available, all the clinical studies analyzed report clear differences in toxicity between the three formulations. AmBisome appears to be clearly less toxic than the other two formulations, in terms of nephrotoxicity and of incidence of infusion-related adverse events. Third, the therapeutic non-equivalence of the three lipid formulations of amphotericin B is further supported by statements of Conferences and Scientific Societies that in their recommendations have awarded different grading to the three lipid formulations. (

Download full-text


Available from: Carlo Cifani, Apr 04, 2014
  • Source
    • "Though they are not bioequivalent (and probably not therapeutically equivalent), all of them allow the administration of doses above 5 mg/kg/day. Current data suggest that liposomal amphotericin is less toxic [26]. This formulation is also the only one that has been extensively studied in the therapy of VL [27]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over 3,000 yearly cases of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) are reported in Brazil. Brazilian Public Health System provides universal free access to antileishmania therapeutic options: Meglumine Antimoniate, Amphotericin B deoxycholate, and Liposomal Amphotericin B. Even though Amphotericin formulations have been advised for severe disease, this recommendation is mostly based on the opinion of experts and on analogy with studies conducted in other countries. Presently, there are two ongoing multicenter clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of the available therapeutic options. Some other issues require further clarification, such as severity markers and the approach to VL/AIDS coinfection. Brazil is facing the challenge of providing access to diagnosis and adequate treatment, in order to avoid VL-related deaths.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013 · Journal of Tropical Medicine
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Amphotericin B (AmB) is still used as the gold standard for therapy against invasive fungal diseases. However, the use of AmB through oral administration is restricted due to its low solubility and stability in aqueous solution, which is the cause for its poor bioavailability and highly varying absorption. Therefore, an attempt has been made to enhance the solubility and stability of AmB to evaluate its bioactivity and safety for use as an inhaler by using a new excipient sodium deoxycholate sulfate (SDS) with aim of using it as a drug carrier for AmB. Therefore, SDS was formulated together with SDS as a dry powder by lyophilization. The dry powder was reconstituted in distilled water and evaluated its physicochemical properties such as zeta potential, particle size and pH to compare its solubility and stability of the formulations with a SDC-AmB (i.e., known as Fungizone(®)). In vitro toxicity studies were carried out with red blood cells (RBC) and respiratory cell lines. Bioactivity was determined by a micro-dilution method against Candidaalbicans and Cryptococcusneoformans. We found that SDS-AmB had a zeta potential (-45.53mV), which was higher than of Fungizone(®); and produced a stable particle size in solution (73.8nm). The particle size distributions of both formulations were expressed as their mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD; 1.70 and 1.74μm), their fine particle fractions (FPF; 70 and 80%) and geometric standard deviations (GSD; 2.3 and 2.0), respectively. These values indicated that the sizes were appropriate for use in an inhaler. Pure AmB was found to hemolyse RBC and was very toxic to alveolar macrophage cells, as their viability rapidly declined from 93 to 56% when the AmB concentration increased from 1 to 8μg/mL. The SDS-AmB formulation had a significantly reduced toxicity compared to AmB. The results clearly indicated that the SDS-lipid based nanoparticles had the potential to be used as an alternative option to Fungizone(®) for an AmB formulation for inhalation.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2014 · International Journal of Pharmaceutics
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We determined the in vitro antifungal activity of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) against 604 clinical yeast isolates. Amphotericin B deoxycholate (D-AmB) was tested in parallel against all the isolates. Susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 method. Overall, L-AmB was highly active against the isolates (mean MIC = 0.42 μg/ml; MIC90= 1μg/ml; 97.2% of MICs were ≤ 1μg/ml) and comparable to D-AmB (mean MIC = 0.48μg/ml; MIC90= 1μg/ml; 97.3% of MICs were ≤ 1μg/ml). The in vitro activity of D-AmB and L-AmB was correlated (R2 = 0.61; exp (Coef.) = 2.3; 95% IC= 2.19-2.44, p<0.001). Candida albicans (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 0.39 μg/ml and 0.31 μg/ml, respectively) and Candida parapsilosis (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 0.38 μg/ml and 0.35 μg/ml, respectively) were the species most susceptible to the agents tested, while Candida krusei (currently named Issatchenkia orientalis) (mean MICs of D-AmB and L-AmB, 1.27 μg/ml and 1.13 μg/ml, respectively) was the least susceptible. The excellent in vitro activity of L-AmB may have important implications for empirical treatment approaches and support its role in treatment of a wide range of invasive infections due to yeasts.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Journal of Medical Microbiology
Show more