Family businesses often have idiosyncratic social and organizational identities, values and norms, normally very closely related to the person of the founder respectively owner, especially in small- and medium-sized family-owned companies. Normally, the corporate culture, but especially the values and norms are built in a long tradition by different means, habitually by means of
... [Show full abstract] role-model-learning or socialization.
Norms and values, as part of the organizational culture, and identity become stable and have a very sticky existence. Not only within large corporations, administrative heritage as stabilizing factor exists.
In business succession, it comes to a change of the owner, most of the times also in the value-orientation. The new owner is in the majority of the cases also the manager. In small and medium-sized family businesses, the organization can often not absorb the imbalance and it comes to a - nearly to say - generation conflict. While the employees regularly represent the values of the parent generation, the new owner stands for other values in life - at least in a lot of cases.
The present study tries to explore a method for measuring these potential imbalances between the generations and the employees. It is a second draft, developing and testing a simple diagnostic tool with the aim of recognizing latent fundamental conflicts before they occur. The argument is not that conflicts are something negative, the argument is to clarify the perspectives and make them visible and discussable.