... The vast majority of existing studies that address these policies are more traditional in scope, not coming from critical traditions. They deal with the way in which concepts such as vulnerability Birkmann & Wisner, 2006;Vink & Takeuchi, 2013) and resilience (Djalante & Thomalla, 2011;Matsuoka & Shaw, 2011) are defined, operationalized, and measured in one or both of the UN frameworks, as well as the extent to which they have been implemented at national and local levels, underlining progress and challenges (e.g., Djalante, Thomalla, Sinapoy, & Carnegie, 2012;Enia, 2013;Jensen, Feldmann-Jensen, Johnston, & Brown, 2015;Manyena et al., 2013;Matsuoka & Shaw, 2012;Matsuoka, Sharma, & Shaw, 2009;Olowu, 2010;Stanganelli, 2008). Thus, there is a knowledge gap regarding how disasters are represented and problematized within these frameworks, as well as what understanding of disasters these policies reproduce. ...