ArticlePDF Available

The Internet in twenty years: cyberspace, the next frontier?

Authors:
  • Ecole des Ponts Business School; University of New Brunswick; University of Stavanger

Abstract

Few dispute the very strong likelihood that within twenty years the global information infrastructure, often referred to as the internet or “the net” will become as generalized, indispensable and invisible as today”s phone or electrical networks. Many commentators also expect this digital web to become the host for cyberspace, the next frontier. This article provides an overview of where a wide range of experts from business, government and the academic world believe this rapidly expanding global information infrastructure is heading over the next two decades.
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 1 Riel Miller,1997
THEINTERNETINTWENTYYEARS:CYBERSPACE,THENEXT
FRONTIER?
By RielMiller
1
Fewdisputetheverystronglikelihoodthatwithintwentyyearstheglobalinformation
infrastructureoftenreferredtoastheInternetortheNetwillbecomeasgeneralised,
indispensableandinvisibleastoday’sphoneorelectricalnetworks.
2 Manycommentators
alsoexpectthisdigitalwebtobecomethehostforcyberspace,thenextfrontier.
Remarkably,thisnewfrontierisrisingup,notoutofthesealikeacontinentfromthe
earth’scrust,butfromourcollectiveimaginationandtechnologicalcapability.Discovery,
however,willnotprovideablueprintforfuturesettlement.Cyberspacecouldturnintoa
placewherepeoplesetupshop,buildcommunities,shareideasandshapethefutureon
thebasisofdemocraticchoices.Or,itcouldcontinuetohurtlealongasawildwesttype
outpostwhereanonymity,lackofprivacyandunsecuredcommunicationskeepoutlaws
andhighrisktakershappy.Inwhichcasetheeverydaysettlersarelikelytostayaway.
Takingoneortheotheroftheseverydifferenttrajectorieswilllargelybeaquestionof
whatkindofinfrastructuredevelops.Cyberspacewillbeshapedbythephysical,
economic,legal,institutional,social,politicalandculturalstructuresthatemergetocreate
frameworksforcommerceandcommunitybuilding.Butwhenitcomestoinfrastructure
onthisscaleitwillnot,norhasiteverbeen,justaquestionofbuildingsomethinglikethe
railroadsandthenwaitingforprosperity.Argentina,RussiaandCanadaallbuiltrailways,
buttheresultswerehardlythesame.Wealthcreationandwellbeingbothinsideandout
ofvirtualrealitywilldependonwhatkindsofinfrastructuredevelop.Cyberspaceisthere
tobedeveloped,theopenquestionishow.
Threemajorsetsofinfrastructurerelatedquestionsinascendingorderofuncertainty 
meritexamination:
1)Howwillthetechnologicalandinstitutionalobstacleslikenetworkovercrowding,lost
messagesandeasyfraudbeovercome?
2)Howwillbusinesses,individualsandgovernmentsrespondtoaworldwhereflowsof
informationandcommerceareseamless,ofhighqualityandinexpensive?
1 OriginallypublishedasanOECDInternationalFuturesProgrammeHighlightin1997.
2 Technicallyspeaking,theInternetisonlyoneofmanytypesof networkthatconnectsvariouscomputers,serving
theroleofconduitforappropriatelyconfigureddata.AsfortheNet,itisabroaderandlesstechnicalterm,that
encompassesallofthemanytendrilsandsegments fromdatatransmissioncablesandswitchestotelephones,home
appliances,automobilesandofcoursecomputers thatwillbeconnectedtogetherinordertoprovideapervasiveand
deeplypenetratingglobalinformationinfrastructure.Cyberspacewilleventuallycometolifeonthisinfrastructureas
arangeofinformationandservicesspanning,atleastforafewanalysts,almostallaspectsofhumanexperience.
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 2 Riel Miller,1997
3)Howwillpoliticalchoicesinfluencethedevelopmentofthistechnologicaltidalwave?
Predictions,assomanyinventorsknow,areriskybusiness.FromThomasEdisontoAllan
Turingtheexpectationsofwhatnewtechnologywouldbeusedfororwhatitmight
achievehaveoftenbeenwayoffthemark.Edisonanticipatedthatthephonographwould
beusedforrecordingdictation,whileTuringexpectedcomputerstobecapableof
intelligent,humanlikeconversationbytheendofthiscentury.Boththeusesand
advancesoftechnologycanendupinunexpectedplaces.
Yet,asalways,lookingtothefutureisacrucialpartofanyefforttoavoidcatastrophe
and,perhapsmoreimportantly,steeracourseotherthanwherethewindblows.
Fortunately,overthepastfewyearstherehasbeenadelugeofanalysisanddebate
regardingtheInternetandtheimplicationsofinformationtechnology.
3 Siftingthrough
thisvoluminousliteraturerevealsanumberofpowerfultrendsandkeychoicesthatare
likelytoshapetheanswerstothethreequestionsposedaboveandformthebasisforthe
speculationsinthischapter.
BUILDINGTHENET:COMPLETINGTHEOPERATIONALAND
FUNCTIONALINFRASTRUCTURE
GrowthratesfortheNet,beitdigitaltrafficoverthetelecommunicationbackbonesorthe
numberofconnectedusersortherangeanddepthofcontent,areanticipatedtocontinue
tobeexplosivewellintothenextcentury(6855)
4
.Forexample,asurveydonebyeland
(www.eland.com)inearly1997ofrecentestimatesofthenumberofInternetusers
worldwideshowsadoublingevery12months,startingatanestimated8.5millionin1995
andreachingover142millionbytheyear2000.UnquestionablytheNetandinformation
technologyingeneralarereachingcriticalmass,thepointatwhichdiffusionmovesfrom
specializednichesectorsliketheacademicanddefensecommunitiestosocietyasawhole.
Whatislesscertainthanthisrapidgrowthinusersandusesisexactlyhowwithwhich
productsandinstitutionstheNet’sbasicinfrastructurewillbescaleduptoprovide:
·thephysicalcapacity(bandwidth,switching,etc.)tohandlethehugeamountsofdigital
traffic;.
·thecompatible,interoperableandsophisticatedsoftware(applications,operating
systemsandintelligentagents)thatarenecessaryiftheNetistolinkallusersina
seamless,easytouseandusefulweb;
3 Seebibliographyforalimitedselection.ForamorecompletelistingseetheOECDInternational
FuturesProgrammeInformationBase(http://www.oecd.org/sge/au).
4 ReferencenumbersrefertotheentryintheCDROMdatabaseentitled:“FutureTrends”developedbytheOECD
InternationalFuturesProgramme(seepage7).
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 3 Riel Miller,1997
·theprivacy,copyright,meansofpaymentandpolicingsafeguardsessentialforreassuring
bothinformationsuppliersandconsumers;and
·theeaseofusethatcanintegratetheNetintoeverydaylifesothatitbecomessecond
naturelikeswitchingonalight,diallingaphonenumberordrivingacar(5929).
Themanyprospectivesolutionstotheseinfrastructuralchallengescanbedividedinto
threecategories.
Operationalinfrastructure: Whenitcomestothebasiccomponentslikefiberoptic
cablesandmicroprocessorsthetechnologicaldirectionisclearfaster,smaller,lessenergy
intensiveandcheaperforagivenlevelofperformance.Inanutshellbigefficiencygains.
But,thereisnotellingwhatwillbetheexactmixofwinningproducts.Thereisstrong
evidencethatintherealmofdatatransmissionavarietyofphysicalpathwayswillcoexist.
Twistedpair,fiberandcoaxialcableswillallcompetewithawiderangeofwireless,
satelliteandinfraredtransmissionmethods.Lookingatthereceivingandtransmitting
hardwarethereisagoodchancethatdiversityandmuchgreaterefficiencywillreignhere
aswell.Oureverydayactivitieswilltakeplacesurroundedbyawiderangeofultrafast,
lowpowerandinterconnectedcomputingdevicessuchaswearabledigitalassistants
integratedintoourclothing(andperhapsevenbeneathourskin),embeddedsystemsthat
linkthespecialpurposemicroprocessorsinourcar,refrigeratorandbriefcase,and
convergencemachinesthatcombineandnetworkbusinessandhouseholdvideo,audioand
computing.
Similaradvancescanbeexpectedintherealmofthebasicnetworkprotocolsand
operatingsoftwarestandards.Overthenextdecadetherewillbeastampedeof
companiesandselfregulatingconsortia—fromthebenevolentInternetEngineeringTask
Force’ssupervisionofprotocolstoSunMicrosystem’sprofitmotivatedpromotionofJava
—attemptingtostakeclaimsatthefrontieroftheNet’soperationalinfrastructure.
Althoughthisnextphasewillnotbeaseasyascapitalisingontheinitial,publiclyfunded
breakthroughslikeTCP/IP(U.S.DefenseDepartmentAdvancedResearchProjects
Agency)andtheWorldWideWeb’shypertextbrowser(EuropeanLaboratoryforParticle
Physics),therearehugeincentivestoreachagreements(7002).Thesestandardsare
indispensableforaseamlessandhighspeedwebwhereeveryonecanconnecteasilyand
information,fromelectronicmailandvideotospecialisedapplicationsanddigital
signatures,flowsfreely (6863,6889).WithoutsuchinteroperabilitytheNetwill
disintegrateintoapatchworkofsealedoffcellsincapableofcreatingthenetwork
efficienciesthatarecentraltocontinuedgrowthandprofitability(6855).
Functionalinfrastructure: Asecondsetofchallengesinvolvestheintroductionofthe
institutionalandpolicyderivedstandards,regulationsandmarketcodesofconductthat
willenablefunctionaluseofanoperationalnetwork’spotential.Threeissues,allrelated
tothecostsofmakingadeal(ortransactioncosts),willbecentraltodeterminingwhether
ornottheNetactuallyoffersabreakthroughinthewayweconducttheageoldactivities
ofbuyingandsellinginformation,goodsandservices.
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 4 Riel Miller,1997
First,thedigitalworldiscallousandoftenoutlawinitstreatmentofpropertyrights,
reproducingonawhimandoftenforprofitcopiesofothers’work.Methodsforensuring
propertyprotectionandderivingrevenuefromtheownershipofcopyrightmaterialwill
needtobefundamentalpartsoftheNet’sfunctionalinfrastructure(6859,6858).
Second,althoughitisrarelymadeexplicit,thecostofsharinginformationorbuyingand
sellingdependsconsiderablyonthedegreeoftrustamongstthetraders.Withouttrustthe
riskandenforcementcostsoftransactionsskyrocket.OntheNet,withitsglobalreach
andindifferencetobordersbetheynational,culturalormoral,establishingtrustwill
requireknittingtogetherinternationallegalframeworksthatofferusers:identity
verification,securepayment,contractandliabilityenforcement,easeofdelivery,cleartax
rules,informationtransparencyandprivacy(2093).
Lastly,universallyrecognisablesignposts,commonrulesoftheroad,andfamiliar
placementofpedals,dialsandothercontrolsprovidedriverswithafairlywidespread
commondenominatornottomentionaonceonlylifetimelearningcost.Withoutglobal
drivingrules,guidepostsandinterfacedesignthecostsofsearching,screeningand
navigatingtheNetwilleitherremainorbecome(ascontentexpands)toohighformany
currentandpotentialusers(6855).
AllthreeoftheseimpedimentstoafunctionalNetwillbeovercomewithinadecade,albeit
withvaryingdegreesofdifficultyandimportantvariationsinthepaceandscopeofthe
solutionsacrosscountries.
Mostcomplexwillbedependablemechanismsforensuringpropertyprotectionand
paymenttocopyrightholders.Heretheobstaclesarenotprimarilytechnologicalsince
solutionsarerapidlycomingavailablethatprovidetamperfreeidentificationoforiginal
documentsandofanysubsequentcopying.Themajorproblemswillbeinthelegal
domain,particularlywithrespecttotheupdatingofcopyrightlawandgainingthe
necessaryinternationalagreements.Oneofthemainchallengesinvolvesfindingthe
economicallyefficientbalancebetweentheinterestsofthecreator/vendorseekingrevenue
andthoseofusersandsocietyatlarge.Ontheonehand,thefreeandopenflowof
informationandintellectualpropertyisexpectedtobecomeevenmoreimportantaswe
moveawayfromanindustrialtoaknowledgeeconomy.Ontheotherhand,stringent
copyrightlawandenforcementcoulderectsomanyproprietaryroadblocksincyberspace
thattheNetcouldenduphinderingratherthanhelpingwiththesharingofideasand
innovation.Lawmakerswillneedtodevotetimeandconsiderableefforttonegotiating
andimplementingboththelocalandglobalschemesthat:reliablyanduniversallysignal
copyrighteddigitalproducts,amendcopyrightlawsinwaysthatbalancecompeting
interestsincludingthoseoffairuseforpublicbenefit,andfullyintegratesimpleperuse
paymentsystemsintothetechnologyoftheNet(6858).
Resolutioniscloserforthesecondandthirdchallengesofestablishingtrustandeasyto
useinterfacesaspowerfulcommercialinterestsandadvancesininformationtechnology
swiftlydrivetheNet’sfunctionalcommercialinfrastructureforward.Withmillionsof
dollarsandmarketshareatstake,privatesectorinitiativeswillcontinuetopressurethe
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 5 Riel Miller,1997
sluggishresponsesandjurisdictionallimitationsofgovernments.Banks,creditcard
issuersandawidearrayofgoodsandservicevendorsfrommerchandise(cars,clothes,
books,pharmaceuticals,food)anddigitisedentertainment(music,video,multimedia,
games)toprofessional(lawyers,doctors,financialadvisors)andinformationservices
(magazines,newspapers,education,healthcare)areallavidlyintentonestablishingas
soonaspossiblethetrust,security,easeofuseanddependabilityuponwhicheveryday
markettransactionsdepend(6195,6862).Withtheprospectofinventing,conqueringor
defendingmarketshares(andfirstmoverprofits)intherapidlyexpanding,soontobe
globalcybereconomyfirmsarerushingtointroducesecurepaymentandcustomerredress
mechanisms,unassailableencryption,uniquedigitalsignatures,easytolearninteractive
interfaces,privacysafeguards,andratingschemesthatallowuserstandardsratherthan
blanketcensorshiptoregulateaccesstotheNet’scontents(7001).
Unfortunately,establishingthesemarketrulesofthegamemaytakelongerthantoday’s
businessesandconsumersmightwish.Foraninternetstartuporanerstwhileinternet
shopperafiveyeartimehorizonistheequivalentofeternity.Butitislikelythatgettingto
thepointwhereinternettransactionsareastrustworthyandsubstantivelyriskfreeascash
paymentforanitematthecornerstorewilltakeafewmoreyearsandrequirecloseco
operationbetweenthepublicandprivatesectors.Indeed,publicinfrastructurehasan
indispensableroletoplay.
RoleofthePublicSector: Tracingthefuturedividinglinebetweenpublicandprivate
infrastructureprovisionisnotasimpletaskgiventhedifferencesamongstcountriesand
theunfamiliarrequirementsofanewfrontier.Fivefactorswill,inmostcases,decide
whichsideofthelineaparticularpartoftheinfrastructurefallson.
Thefirstfactorpertainstohowgovernmentsestablishandmaintaincompetitiveconditions
inkeymarketssuchastelecommunications,computerhardwareandthewiderangeof
softwarefromunderlyingoperatingsystemsandbrowserstoprivacyandtransaction
applications.Ifgovernmentsareabletoeffectivelyuseantitrustpoliciestoguardagainst
collusionorunfairmarketdominance,thentherewillbelessreason(andlesspolitical
pressure)fordirectpublicintervention.Strongcompetitionismorethanfeasiblegiventhe
numberanddiversityofpotentialprivatesectorplayers,including:phonecompanies,cable
operators,Internetaccessproviders,chipmanufacturers,computervendors,electronic
applianceproducers,softwaredevelopersandthevastrangeofcontentproviders(2093,
6033).Assumingthatgovernmentsaresuccessfulinencouragingcompetitionand
vigilantlypreventexcessmarketpowerinallofthesemanymarkets,thenthereislittle
doubtthatapredominantshareoftheNet’soperationalandfunctionalinfrastructurewill
beprovidedbytheprivatesector.Everythingfromgloballyaccessibleelectronicmailand
cryptographicsecuritytothecomputingappliancesandnetworkconnectionswillbe
offeredbyawiderangeofcompanieshailingfromallpartsoftheworld.
Yet,evenwithwellfunctioningmarkets,thereareotherfactorsthatargueforapublic
sectorroleinthedevelopmentofcyberspace’sinfrastructure.
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 6 Riel Miller,1997
Thesecondfactorinfluencingpublicparticipationgoesbeyondwaysofensuring
competitiontothedifferentwaysofachievinguniversal,equitableandinexpensiveaccess,
trustandinteroperabilityincyberspace.Politics,asexploredattheendofthischapter,
willmakeabigdifferencehere.Onecountry’sdefinitionofaccesscanbecloseto
anotherísconceptionofexclusion.Butnoteveryoneneedstosharethesameapproach
andthereisprobablynoharmincompetingmodels.Somecountrieswillwanttoensure
securityandaccesstocyberspaceusingpubliclyownedandmanagedservices.Others
maytrustprivateproviderstoensureaffordableconnectionsprotectedbyunbreakable
cryptography.Considerablescopealsoexistsformixedpublicprivateconsortiatosetout
therules,standardsandincertaincasesdirectservicessuchastheoversight,registration
andmanagementofinternetdomainnames.Internationalpublicprivatecooperationwill
alsobeessentialfortheintroductionofaglobalcommercialcode,asproposedbythe
Clintonadministrationinmid1997initsFrameworkforGlobalElectronicCommerce
(http:www.iitf.nist.gov/eleccomm/ecomm.html).Overthenextdecadeagreementsofthis
typeandtheorganizationsthatsupportthemwillbefundamentalforestablishingthetrust
neededamongstproducersandconsumersifelectroniccommerceistoreallyboom.
A thirdelementlikelytoinfluencetheextentofpublicsectorinvolvementincyberspace
concernscivilrightsandresponsibilities.Againnoteverycountrysharesthesamehistory
andtraditionswithsomeleaningmoreonlegalorconstitutionalframeworkstoshapethe
wayrightsandresponsibilitiesareexercisedwhileothersdependmoreondirect,publicly
providedservices.Althoughtherighttovoteandtherighttohaveaverifiableidentityin
cyberspacearenotyetonpar,theremaycomeatimewhenexpressingonespoliticalviews
orlearningabouttheviewsofotherswilldemandapresenceinvirtualreality.Whenit
comestosuchissuesascybercitizenshipelectoratesarelikelytoinsistonastrongrolefor
government.Afterall,electorallistsandcitizenshipareuniversallythepurviewofpublic
authoritiesandarelikelytostaythatway.
Thefourthareawherepublicinfrastructurewillbeasignificantpresenceincyberspaceare
activitiesliketaxation,supervisionofcurrenciesandfinancialmarkets,policingand
nationaldefense.Someoftheseissues,likestreamliningcustomsclearanceorthe
potentialerosionofthetaxbaseasindividualsandfirmsseekcyberspacehavensfrom
salesandincometaxesaswellastheimplicationsofNetbasedcreditandelectronic
moneyfornationalandglobalfinancialsystems,willbethrustupongovernments(7002).
Onotherissues,liketherelationshipbetweencryptographyandcriminalactivityordata
hackingandnationalsecurity,mostgovernmentsarealreadydeeplyinvolved.Again,it
willtaketimetoworkouttheexactconfigurationofnational,internationalandevenlocal
lawsandinstitutionsthatwilleffectivelyundertaketaxcollection,supervisefinancial
marketsandguardagainstcrimeandwarlikeaggression.Intheseareastherewill
probablybeadifficultracewherelimitedjurisdictionalauthorityandinsufficientinterestor
skillinnegotiatinginternationalagreementsslowspublicsectoreffortstocatchupwith
therapidadvancesofaseamlessglobalNet(6862).
Thefinalfactorlikelytoaffectthedividinglinebetweenpublicandprivateinfrastructure
incyberspacepertainstoservicesthatremain,inmanycountries,outsidethecommercial
spheresuchashealthcare,educationandsocialsecurity(6093,6115).Herethereisa
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 7 Riel Miller,1997
dualchallenge,firsttomakesurethattheNetprovidestherequiredlevelsofprivacy,
respectforhumanrightsanduniversalitythatarerequiredintheseareasandthento
explorenewmodelsof governance(collectivedecisionmaking)andsocialresponsibility
thataremadefeasiblebyafullyoperationalandfunctionalNet(6664,6860).Thispartof
thepublicinfrastructurewillatfirstconsistmostlyofextensionsofexistingservicesinto
cyberspace.Governmentswillpursuethisexpansionpartlyforefficiencyreasonsand
partlybecausetherewillbeademand,particularlyforeducationalservicesandhealth
information.Theemergenceofmoreambitiousandinnovativeinfrastructuressuchasnew
waysoforganisingriskmanagementfundslikepublicpensions,unemploymentinsurance
andwelfarewillhingemostlyontheunpredictableoccurrenceofwidespreadpolitical
courageandforesight.
USINGTHENET:CONSUMERSANDPRODUCERSCONQUER
CYBERSPACE
Takingacuefromthehistoryofhowpreviousuniversaltechnologiesdiffused,itisnotfar
fetchedtoexpectthattheNetwillgraduallyreorganisehow,what,whereandwhenwe
produceandconsume.Ittooktheelectricmotorfortyyearsfromitsinitialintroductionto
fullytransformboththefactoriesthatwereoncepoweredbycentralsteamengineswith
leatherbeltsandtheconsumerproductsthatcouldnotevenbeimaginedbeforehand.Be
itelectricity,thetelephoneortheautomobileittakestimeandsignificantchangesinmany
ingrainedmethods,tacitandexplicitwaysofdoingbusinessandconductingdailylife
beforesuchinventionsfindfullfruition(1671).Cyberspacewillbenodifferent.
Time,effortanddifficultchoiceswillberequiredtoadaptandinventtheappropriate
infrastructure.Indeed,thepervasivenessoftheNet’simpactoverthenexttwodecades
willlargelydependonourcapacitytodeveloptheinfrastructurethatcantakeadvantage
ofsignificantlylowercostsofsharinginformation particularlymarketsignals(6866).In
mostmarkets,includingthoseforgoods,services,finance,andlabour,theNetcould
reducecostsinfourways:
·byprovidinglessexpensiveaccesstoagreaternumberofpeopleandfirm
·throughgreaterspeedofinformationacquisitionallowinglessplanned,more
spontaneoussearchesforproducts,suppliers,pricesandevaluations;
·byreducingtimeconstraints,sincesearchescanbedoneatanytime;and
·byliberatingtransactionsandinformationfromgeographic,locationallimits,sincethe
dataflowsfromanywheretheNetcanreach.
ShouldtheNetbecomethisinexpensiveandaccessibleindexofmuchofhuman
knowledge,thentheratioofcost(time,money,etc.)toagivenqualityofinformationwill
fall,potentiallyverysignificantly(7002).Likethediscoveryofoil,anewsupply(orless
expensiveaccessorimprovementsinquality)ofacriticalresourcecanmakeabig
differenceinthewayproductsaredeveloped,producedandused.Similarly,making
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 8 Riel Miller,1997
effectiveuseforbusinessandpleasureofamoreefficientinformationsystemwilldemand
changesacrossaseriesofrelationshipsthatareofteninvisibleandtakenforgranted.The
infrastructureofeverydayemploymentandlifewherewegotowork,howweshop,the
waytofindajobandeventhewayweproducewillneedtobesignificantlyreconfigured,
ifnotreinvented
Producerandconsumerwebs: ANetinducedleapintheefficiencyofacquiring
informationandconductingtransactions(monetaryandnonmonetary)will,inall
likelihood,inducemajorchangesinfourfundamentalsetsofmarketrelationships:
·first,amongstproducersasdecentralisedsupplynetworksblossom;
·second,betweenproducersandconsumersasnewdirectconnectionsareforged;
·third,amongstconsumersasmoreefficientconnectionsenablethesharingofproduct
assessmentsandthepoolingofpurchasingpower;and
·lastly,betweenconsumersandproducersasthisdistinctionbeginstoblurasthe
customer’sknowledgebecomesacentralelementofthetotalvalueaddedcontainedinthe
finalproduct.
Manymarketsarelikelytobetransformedbydirect,accurateandfastNetbasedaccessto
suppliersoflabour,services,financingandcommodities.Bothproducersandconsumers
willhaveanopportunitytodiversifyanddeepentheirmarketrelationshipswithalower
riskofincurringexcessivesearchcostsorerrors(1671,6863).Greatereaseinsettingup
outsourcing,temporarycontractworkandvirtualcompaniesandproductscouldleadto
majorchangesinthewayfirms,labourmarketsanddistributionchainsfunction.Inthe
pasttheheadoffice,unionhiringhallandsupermarketservedtosignificantlyreduce
informationcosts.Inastoreoraroundthewatercooleritisrelativelyeasytogainaccess
andverifyinformation.Doingadealhappensonthespot.
Afullyoperationalandfunctionalcyberspacewilloffermanyandevenmoreofthesame
advantages.Buttherealgainswillbegeneratedby goingbeyondtheoldwaysofdoing
business.TakingfulladvantageoftheNet’spotentialfordirect(fewerintermediate
steps),flexible(widerrangeofsources)andevenspontaneous(lastminutesourcing)will
requirenewapproachestoorganisingabusiness,thehouseholdanddailylife.Anew
infrastructurewillneedtoemergetoreplaceoratleastenhancethefamiliarlunch
meetingsandbuddysystems.
Onthesupplysideonepossibilityisthatthecentralised,multifunctionalenterprisesand
distributionsystemsoftodaywilldissolveintocomponentparts,hookedintoavastand
moreefficientwebofsuppliersandconsumers.Evenmoresignificantly,inventing
productsaswellassellingthemcouldreversedirection,asconsumersgeneratethecustom
specificationstheydesireandthenseekoutcompetentproducersandevenotherbuyers.
Insteadoftoday’saggressivedistributionandmarketingwherethevendorpursuesthe
consumer,theNetmightusherinaworldwhereconsumers(individuallyorinnetworked
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 9 Riel Miller,1997
groupsorusingbrokers)solicitbids,developproductsorsendoutqueriesaimedat
fulfillingtheirneedsatthelowestprice(6195,6863).Thiswouldfinallyaccomplishwhat
themanagementgurushavebeentalkingaboutbytranscendingboththeoldindustrial
approachtomakingthingsandthearmyinspired,engineerrunhierarchicalcommand
structure.
Onthedemandsideitmaybecomepossibleforparticipantsacrossawiderangeof
differenttypesoftransactiontobecomemuchlessanonymoustooneanotherasvast
databases,telepresenceandvirtualrealityunveilexchangerelationshipsonceshroudedby
thelimitedavailability(orinadequacy)ofinformationonprice,qualityandpastbuyer’s
experiences.Hiddenbehindtheproductsontoday’ssupermarketshelvesarelongchains
ofproduction,nottomentionpeople.Consumerscouldbegintopiercethisveilof
mystery.UsingtheNetitmayonceagainbepossibletoknowthecowthatproducesthe
milkyoudrink(butthistimewithoutgettingyourbootsdirty).Withtheproximity
possiblethroughvirtualrealityitbecomesfeasibletoknowthehighlyskilledartisanthat
weavesyourcarpets,writesyoursoftware,buildsyourbicycle,cobblesyourshoesand
composesthemusicyoulike.Anewfabricforcommerceandinventionbecomes
possible.
Turningthepossibleintotheprobablewillnotoccurwithoutsignificantand,attimes
difficult,adaptationonthepartofworkers,managers,ownersandconsumers.The
requisitefirm,householdandcommunityinfrastructurewillemerge,inpart,aspeopleseek
toachievetheirpoliticalandsocialgoalsand,inpart,fromthepressureexertedbythe
competitiveforcesunleashedbytheNet’stransparencyandglobalreach.Consideringthe
latterissuefirst,itiscrucialformanagersandpolicymakerstorecognisethattheNetmay
radicallyaltertheeconomicconditionsthatunderliecompetition.
Competitionandcollusionincyberspace:ShouldtheNetsucceedinsurpassingthe
currenttraditionalsupplierandconsumerrelationshipsitmayalsoprofoundlyaltertwo
criticaldeterminantsofthecompetitiveconditionsofmostmarkets.Thefirstisthecostof
developingaproductandthenenteringaparticularsectorbybecomingaproducer.The
secondisthecostofbecomingknownorgainingaccesstobuyers,beingabletotapinto
largepoolsofpotentialconsumers.
Oneperspectiveholdsthattomorrow’sknowledgeeconomyrunningontheNetmay
unleashastormofcompetitionasboththecapitalcostsofentryintoamarketandthe
difficultyofestablishingrecognitionandtrustonthepartoftheconsumerevaporate
(6862,6859).Anopposingviewarguesthatslashinginformationcostsisjustaslikelyto
spawnmassivefirmsthatleveragetheNet’scapacitytoenhanceintrafirmcoordination
(intranets),productbrandinganddiscriminatorydistributionchannels,inordertoachieve
unassailablemarketdominanceinaworldcharacterisedbyinformationoverload(6625).
Inthislatterscenario,producerswillcontinuetobandtogether,evenmoreefficientlyand
withgreaterriskofcollusion,andtheroleofexperienceinbuildingtrustandconfidence
willcontinuetogivefamiliaremployersandsuppliersanadvantageovertheunfamiliar
(2004,2093).
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 10 Riel Miller,1997
Whichofthesetwoscenariosprevailswilllargelyhingeonwhetherornotbothsuppliers
andconsumersmanagetodeveloptheorganisationalinfrastructure(virtualornot)that
canassureinexpensiveandaccuratesharingofinformationaboutqualityandpriceinways
thatencouragerazorsharpcompetition,withoutoverreachingtobecomecartels.On
balanceitseemsunlikelythattheadvantagesaccruingtolarge,longstandingsuppliers
duetoaprovencapacitytocoordinateproductionandinspireconsumerconfidencewill
vanish(1671).Theremayevenbetheriskthatanewamorphouscentralisationorvirtual
exclusion(likethecyberspaceshoppingmallandsinglefirmintranetthatcancontrolentry
conditions),mademorepowerfulbytheNet,willendupstiflingcompetitionandforestall
theemergenceofanew,artisanalvaluechainwheretheconsumerisabletobecomea
producerandenterthemarket.Onceagainpoliticswillmakeadifferenceindetermining
theoutcome.
BEYONDTHENET:GRASPINGTHENEWSOCIOECONOMIC
POSSIBILITIES
Leastcertain,yetperhapsmostimportantarequestionsconcerninghowcollective
politicalandculturalaspirationsmightbeabletousetheNet’spotentialtoreshape
society.Aswithothertechnologiesthathavebecomeintrinsicpartsofeverydaylifelike
theautomobile,differentphysical,socialandeconomicconfigurationsmayprevailin
distinctivesocietieswithparticulartraditions,valuesandpoliticalpreferences.TheNetis
nodifferent,itopensuppossibilities,fromtheominoustotheutopian,forfacilitatingthe
developmentofnewortheconsolidationofoldsocialorders(2004).
Forinstance,thereseemstobelittledoubtthattheNet,wellsuitedasitistothe
intangibleoutputofalearningeconomy,couldplayamajorroleintopplingthealready
disintegratingmassproduction,massconsumptionsocietysocharacteristicofOECD
countriesinthepostwarera.CertainlytheNethasthecapacitytoencourage:unique
products,directconsumerproducerlinkages,completelyflexibleworkingarrangements,
andtheeasyentryofcompetitorsfromallovertheglobeintoequallydispersedmarkets
(7002).Suchdevelopmentsleadsometoenvisageasocietywherethepatternsofwork
andplaymoveawayfromfixedtimeslotsandlocations,officesandfactories,suburbsand
shoppingcentres,urbanmasstransitandmasseducation(6567,6917).Employment,
insteadofbeingconcentratedinfirms,coulddiffusetowhereverwealthcreationactually
occurs.And,wealthcreationcouldspreadintimeandspacetowhereverandwhenever
theconsumerproducerhappenstoundertakevalueaddedactivity.
Suchreconfigurationsofwhen,whereandhowweworkandlivehavealreadyoccurredin
thiscenturywiththeshiftoutofagricultureandlatelyawayfrommanufacturing.As
befitsanewfrontier,avastandcreativerangeofscenarios,reflectingdifferentaspirations
andpriorities,areemerging.
Forsomepeoplecyberspaceisseenasawayoffacilitatingthedevelopmentofamore
tolerant,democraticandcommunityorientedsociety.Cyberspacecould,withconcerted
effortstoensureaccess,confidenceandcompetition,enableaconsiderableredistribution
ofeconomicandpoliticaldecisionmakingpowerfromthehandsofmanagersand
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 11 Riel Miller,1997
representativesintothehandsofindividualsengageddirectlyinaddingvalueandshaping
theircommunitybasedonindepthpersonalknowledgeandtastes(6093).Insucha
futuresocietytheartisanasopposedtotoday’stechnocrat,thecitizenasopposedto
today’sbureaucratandtheindividualasopposedtotoday’semployer,mightbeableto
usecyberspacetogainmuchgreaterandmoredirectcontroloverwhattheyproduceand
thekindofcommunitytheylivein(e.g.whatreligiousormoralstandardsapply).
Thereareothervisionarieswhoseethepotentialofcyberspacetoreduceenvironmental
burdens.If“green”valuesandpoliciesprevail,cyberspaceefficienciescouldbringwithin
therealmofthefeasible,evenaffordablypractical,therealisationoflessenvironmentally
gluttonouswealthcreationbyhelpingto:slashprivateautomobileuse(nocommutingto
work,school,shopping),cutwasteinthedeliveryofgoodsandservices(betterscheduling
andpoolingfortangiblegoods,directdownloadfordigital items),improvebuildinglevel
systemsofenergygenerationandmanagement(5929).Byrenderingspaceandtimemore
pliableandmarketsmoreefficientitevenbecomesplausibletoimaginephysicaldistance
fromtheonslaughtoftoday’scitiesandmasssocietywithoutbeingcutofffromtheweb
ofinformationandexchangethatmakeseveryonesointerdependent(6857).Combining
theglobalandthelocalmightbedoable.
PoliticalVisionandCollectiveAction.Yet,evenasnewhorizonsbeckon,itremainsfar
fromclearwhatpoliticalorsocialprocesswillleadtothereplacementofyesterday’s
passiveworkerandconsumer,whowaittobetoldwhat,when,whereandhowto
produceandconsume,withanotherwayoflivingandworking(6283).Fashioninga
society ofindustrialworkersfromaworldoffarmerstookradical(forthetime)policies
suchastheintroductionofcompulsoryanduniversaleducationandmanydramaticand
brutaleventsfromwarsanddepressionstomassmigrationsandrevolutions.Itwilltake
leadership,insightandprobablyabitoflucktosuccessfullyextendandthengobeyond
thetraditionalhabitsandpoliciesthatsuitedourindustrialpast.
Whenlifewasruledbytherhythmofthesunandseasonsitseemedridiculousto
contemplatebeingruledbytheschoolbellandfactorywhistle.Butithappened.
Radicalrulesaretheonesthatchangethewaythegameisplayed.Taketheintroduction
ofcompulsoryschooling.Itwasanewrulethatradicallychangedbothlaborsupply
conditions(stoppingchildrenfromworking)andthecompetitivepositionofprevious
generationswhohadn’tbeenofferedfreeupgradingoftheirhumancapital.Orconsider
theintroductionoftheSecuritiesandExchangeCommissionwithitsimpositionofradical
requirementslikecommonaccountingandreportingconventions.
Theseradical(forthetime)rulesoftheindustrialagetendedtoencourage
standardization.Youngpeopleemergedfromschoolwithabasicsetofcognitiveand
behavioralskills(reading,writing,arithmetic,punctualityandobedience).Such
uniformitywasgoodformassproductionfactories,armiesandcentralizedstockmarkets.
Butitisnotthewaytomakethebestuseofthepotentialofcybespace.
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 12 Riel Miller,1997
Futurecollectiveactions,likethoseundertakenbygovernmentsonbehalfofallcitizens
whenframeworksareintroducedforfinancialorlabormarkets,willhavetoencourage
uniquenessandcreativity.Thesenewruleswillnotonlyloosenmanyoldconstraintsbut
asimportantlyreducetherisksofindependence.Otherwisegoingitalonewillremainthe
rareactofthefrontieroutlawordesperateoutcastinsteadofthewidespreadwayof
addingvalueinadecentralized,artisansociety.Tomorrow’sradicalruleswillneedto
liberateasmuchifnotmorethantheyconstrain.
ValuingHumanCapital.Oneexampleofanareaforsuchnew,paradoxicalrulesmeant
toencourageradicalsisintherealmofassessingwhatpeopleknow.Inthepastitwas
fairlysafetoconsiderahighschooldiplomatobeagoodindicatorofwhatsomeoneknew
basicliteracyanddependability.Employmentrecords,gatheredfromfamiliarfirmsin
recognizableoccupations,alsotoldagenerallyintelligiblestoryaboutwhatapersonknew
howtodo.Thesevagueindicatorsofproductivecapacitywereadequateforold
fashionedwhiteandbluecollarjobsheldforyearsonend.
Incyberspacethereductionofhighsearchcosts,longprobationperiodsandregular
failuresinfindingtherightpersonforthatoneoffjobiswhatwillmakethedifference
betweenabarrenandathrivingsettlement.Realizingthefullpotentialofcyberspacewill
hinge,inpart,ontheintroductionofrulesthatprovideuniversal,accessibleand
dependableinformationaboutwhatpeopleknow.Thatway whenIneedtohireyouto
cookmynextdinnerpartyordesignandfabricatemywallpaperorchecktheequationsin
atechnicalpaperorfindaperfectvacationspotI’llknowyourtrackrecord.
Rulesforassessingwhatpeopleknowwillhelppeoplefindtheservicestheyneed.And,
flexible,universalrulesthatvalidatewhatpeopleknowwillencouragetheaccumulationof
knowledgeinitsmany,oftenradicallyinnovativeforms.
Inthiswaytheblacksmithturnedassemblylineworker(re)turnedartisan getsthefreedom
tocreateandbecreative.Atthesametimethisinnovativecapacityanditseconomic
viabilityarefacilitatedbyrulesthatensureopenanddependablestandardstoguide
transactionsandinformationsharing.Combiningtherulelessworldoftheimagination
withtheconventionsorrulesdemandedbyacommonlanguagethatallowsunimpeded
exchangeistheparadoxoftomorrow’srulesforradicals.
Cybercitizenship.Anotherexampleofthetypeofnewrulesthatwillbeneededifwe
aretoencouragethecreativityandradicalismmadefeasiblebytheNethastodowith
identity.
Atthemoment,easilyverifiableandinviolateidentityarealmostunattainablein
cyberspace.Thiswillhavetochange.Asecureandclearidentityispivotalforthe
developmentofbothelectroniccommerceandtomorrow'svirtualcommunities.
WhenIwalkintoastore,pickupamagazine,gotothecash,putmymoneyonthe
counterandleave,I'veengagedinaquasianonymoustransaction.Thecashierhasseen
meandmightbeabletorecognizeme,butunlessI'vepaidbycreditcardorcheckthey
don'tknowmuchmoreaboutme.Thisisfairlyefficient.ThecashhascredibilityandI'm
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 13 Riel Miller,1997
physicallypresenttoassertmyexistence.Thereisnoneedforfurtherinformation about
meorthevendor.
Electroniccommerce,aseveryoneknows,promisestobeevenmoreefficientsinceIdon't
havetogotothecornerstoretogetmymagazine.And,anonymityontheNet,asall
canineinternautsknow,canbealmostcomplete.Informationcostsarekepttoa
minimum.Sofarsogood.
But,whathappenswhenIdon'twanttobeanonymousorevenmoreimportantlywhena
lackofverifiableidentityunderminescredibilityandliability?Thisiswherethe
informationcostsoftheNetbecome,forthetimebeing,morecostlythaninthematerial
world.
ConsiderafeweverydaywaysofusingtheNet,forinstance,tomakeadepositinan
internetbankortopurchaseasubscriptiontoaninternetmagazineorreturnafaulty
blenderpurchasedviatheNetorsubmitareportbacktothehomeoffice.Doesitmatter
thatabankhaslittlecapacitytoverifythatyouactuallyarewhoyouclaimtobe?Doesit
matterthatyouhavelittlewayofknowingifthebankormagazinereallyexistbeyonda
scam onamachine?IsitanobstacletobuyingsomethingviatheNetifyoudon'tknow
whotogobacktoiftheproductisfaultyorwhatlawsorjurisdictionapplytothevirtual
store?WillyouthinktwicebeforesubmittingacrucialdocumentviatheNetwhenyou
knowhoweasyitisforsomeonetoimpersonateyou?
Indeed,withoutcybercitizenshipandtherighttoasecureidentitytherecanbeno
privacy.Withoutcybercitizenshipandtheresponsibilitiesthatgowithidentifiabilitythere
canbenocredibility impersonation,fabricationanddefamationaretooeasy.Without
cybercitizenshiponlythestrong(rich)willbeabletoassertanddefendtheiridentities
usingthelatesttechnologicalwonders.Inshort,theeconomic,socialandpolitical
potentialoftheNetdependsonestablishingthekindsofrightsandresponsibilitiesthat
werewonlongagointhestrugglesfortoday'smorefamiliarnationalcitizenship.
Theadventofcybercitizenshipdoesnotexclude,infactitmayfacilitatethedevelopment
ofbothmoreinternationalandexclusiveidentitiesofferedbyprivatefirmsorgroupsof
likemindedindividuals.Thereisstillplentyofscopefortelecom,travelandcreditcard
companiestooffer"gold"statusoraffinityidentitiescontainingadditionalorspecial
informationaboutyou.This,inturn,shouldhelptounderscoretheglobalnatureofcyber
citizenshipandmayperhapspavethewayforauniversallygrantedrighttoan
internationalidentityincyberspace.
Auniversalglobalsystem,nottiedtonationstatesandinviolatefromnationalistexcuses
forinvadingprivacymayperhaps,oneday,unitethepeopleoftheworldincyberspacein
wayswehavefounddifficultonthesurfaceofoursmallplanet.Thismayendupbeingthe
routetoextendingthehardwonrightsandprivilegesofnationalcitizenship,alongwith
theresponsibilitiesandjurisdictionalaffiliation,tothegloballevel.
GettingfromHeretoThere.Niethermarketnorindividuallogicalonearelikelytopush
throughalltheneededchangesinourpoliticalandsocialinfrastructure.Commutingby
carpollutes,takestime,consumersenergyandcostshugeamountsforthephysical
infrastructure,yetmostpeopletaketheircartowork,toshopandtoplay.Fewpeople
havethetime,wealthorevendesiretodiscoverexactlywhoandhowtheirbreakfast
cerealwasproducedeventhoughafairnumbersuspectthatdangerouspesticidesor
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 14 Riel Miller,1997
preservativesmayhavebeenadded.Nordomanypeopleworryaboutwhattheir
communitymightlooklikeifthenewzoningbylawpassescitycouncil.
Toooften,giventhecurrentcultureandincentivesystems,thefutureofourqualityoflife
isasecondaryconcern.Gatheringthenecessaryinformation,sharingideasandlearning
enoughtodeveloptheknowledgeneededfordecisionmakingarecostlypursuitsthat
remainoutsidetherealmofpractical,everydayactivity.Itisnotsurprising,inthis
context,thatdemocracyisformostcitizensaveryparttimeaffair,iftheyvoteatall.
Littlewonderthatdiscouragementandcynicismsurroundmanyofourpolitical
institutions.
Curingtheseillswillnotbethemagicoutcomearisingfromtheintroductionofnew
technologiesliketheNet.Atthemomentitremainsuncertainifcyberspacewillactually
becomeanewfrontier,aspaceforthedemocraticrealisationofhumanaspirations,or
simplyanothertechnologythatenhancesefficiency.Willthepotentialofthis
technologicaltidalwavetoreconfiguresocietybeshapedbyexplicit,democraticallyposed
choicesorwillthepoliticalprocess,laggingtoofarbehindthepracticalchanges,be
confinedtoassertingourcollectivevaluesandimaginationafterthefact?Pastexperience
hassadlydemonstratedthatsimplydiscoveringnewterritory asislikelytohappenas
theNet’soperationalfunctionalinfrastructurepushesaheadinthenextdecadesdoes
notguaranteeeitherprosperityoradvancementofthehumanspirit.Collectivechoices
andtheaspirationsunderpinningarewhatwillmakethedifference.
2004ROADWARRIORS:DREAMSANDNIGHTMARESALONGTHE
INFORMATIONHIGHWAYByBurstein,Daniel;Kline,David;PenguinBooks,New
York,NY,US,466P.(1995)
2093ASURVEYOFTHEWORLDECONOMY:THEHITCHHIKERS'GUIDETO
CYBERNOMICS ByWoodall,Pam,in:TheEconomist,Vol.340,No.7985,24P.
(1996)
5929SPACE,PLACE,ANDTHEINFOBAHN:CITYOFBITSByMitchell,
WilliamJ.;TheMITPress,Cambridge,MA,US,225P.(1995)
6033INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGIESByPatterson,DavidA.;Zysman,GeorgeI.;
Chan,VincentW.S.;Lenat,DouglasB.;Maes,Pattie;Laurel,Brenda;Daggatt,
Russell,in:ScientificAmerican,Vol.273,No.3,PP.4871(1995)
6093THECYBERFUTURE:92WAYSOURLIVESWILLCHANGEBYTHE
YEAR2025ByCornish,Edward,in:TheFuturist,Vol.30,No.1,PP.2742(1996)
6115CRIMEINCYBERSPACEByStephens,Gene,in:TheFuturist,Vol.29,No.5,
PP.2428(1995)
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 15 Riel Miller,1997
6195THEINFOMEDIAREVOLUTION:HOWITISCHANGINGOURWORLD
ANDYOURLIFEByKoelsch,Frank;McGrawHillRyersonLtd,Whitby,Ont,CA,
358P.(1995)
6283ELECTRONICPOWERTOTHEPEOPLE:WHOISTECHNOLOGY'S
KEEPERONTHECYBERSPACEFRONTIER?ByOgden,MichaelR.,in:
TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,Vol.52,No.2&3,PP.119133(1996)
6434OFFICESPACE,CYBERSPACEANDVIRTUALORGANIZATIONBy
Barnatt,Christopher,in:JournalofGeneralManagement,Vol.20,No.4,PP.7891
(1995)
6567FUTURECOMMUNICATION(orig.FremtidenKommunikation)ByHoppe,
MariaTherese;Nielsen,ArnoVictor;Lyngsø;Olesen,Axel,in:Fremtidsorientering,No.
4,PP.734(1996)
6625THEFUTUREFORMULTIMEDIA THEBATTLEFORWORLD
DOMINANCEByGriffith,MartinWyTaylor,Bernard,in:Long RangePlanning,
Vol.29,No.5,PP.643651(1996)
6664CYBERSPACEANDTHEAMERICANDREAM:AMAGNACARTAFOR
THEKNOWLEDGEAGEByDyson,Esther;Gilder,George;Keyworth,George;
Toffler,Alvin,in:TheInformationSociety,Vol.12,No.3,PP.295308(1996)
6855THEUNPREDICTABLECERTAINTY:INFORMATIONINFRASTRUCTURE
THROUGH2000ByTheNationalAcademyofSciences,NationalAcademyPress,
Washington,DC,US,281P.(1996)
6857UNIVERSALACCESSTOEMAIL:FEASIBILITYANDSOCIETAL
IMPLICATIONSByAnderson,RobertH.;Bikson,ToraK.;Law,SallyAnn;Mitchell,
BridgerM.;RAND,SantaMonica,US,267P.(1995)
6858THEFUTUREOFELECTRONICCOMMERCE:FIFTHANNUAL
ROUNDTABLEONINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGYByBollier,David;TheAspen
Institute,Washington,DC,US,64P.(1996)
6859RULINGTHENETBySpar,Debora;Bussgang,JeffreyJ.,in:HarvardBusiness
Review,Vol.74,No.3,PP.125141(1996)
6860LABOURMANAGEMENTPROGRAMME:GLOBALINFORMATION
INFRASTRUCTURE,GLOBALINFORMATIONSOCIETYByOECD,External
RelationsDivision,Paris,FR,30P.(1996)
6862ELECTRONICCOMMERCEANDTHEINTERNETByPyle,Raymond,in:
CommunicationsoftheACM,Vol.39,No.6,PP.2399(1996)
OECDInternationalFuturesProgramme 16 Riel Miller,1997
6863THEFUTUREOFSOFTWAREByLeebaert,Derek,ed.;TheMITPress,
Cambridge,MA,US,300P.(1995)
6866THEDIGITALENTERPRISE:HOWNEWTECHNOLOGIESARE
TRANSFORMINGFRENCHCOMPANIES(orig.L'EntrepriseDigitale:Commentles
NouvellesTechnologiestransformentlesEntreprisesFrançaises)ByAndré,Arnaud;
Habib,Jacques;Guez,JeanClaude;Vandebrouck,Guy;EditionsGénéralesFirst,Paris,
FR,351P.(1996)
6889EUROPEANINFORMATIONTECHNOLOGYOBSERVATORY1997By
EUROBIT,EuropeanInformation TechnologyObservatory,1997,Frankfurt/Main,DE,
(1997)
6917THEEMPLOYMENTPOTENTIALOFNEWELECTRONICMEDIA(orig.
BeschäftigungspotentialeneuerelektronischerMedien)ByIFOInstitutfür
Wirtschaftsforschung,in:IFOSchnelldienst,Vol.50,No.3,1997,PP.318(1997)
7001DIGITALMONEY:THENEWERAOFINTERNETCOMMERCEByLynch,
DanielC.;Lundquist,Leslie;JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.,NewYork,NY,US,279P.
(1996)
7002WHATWILLBE:HOWTHENEWWORLDOFINFORMATIONWILL
CHANGEOURLIVESByDertouzos,Michael;HarperCollinsPublishers,NewYork,
NY,US,336P.(1997)
... In the new era of post-globalisation, innovation is a necessary tool for national economic prosperity. Global competition consequences and information technology require governments to transform their operations and address time-consuming processes (Miller, 1999). Thus, these drivers have been the primary forces that have prompted the public sector to focus on innovation as a means of improving productivity and performance. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this paper was to identify common themes from archival records related to innovation in the Australian Public Service (APS). A thematic analysis was conducted to review and evaluate archival records which consisted of transcripts from senior manager presentations at Innovation Month seminars from 2014 to 2018 and other related official documents. This empirical study addressed innovation from the leaders’ perspective, reflecting upon their experience. Analysing themes within archival records helped to gain insights from various perspectives of leaders on how they regard an innovation agenda for the APS. Three themes emerged from archival records: (1) innovation characteristics; (2) drivers of innovation; and (3) barriers to innovation. Synthesis of these drivers and barriers can provide important insights for senior APS managers on how they can enhance their organisations’ ability to innovate in order to respond to digital disruption challenges and opportunities. Variety of perspectives with leader’s perceptions informs about authors’ selection of the research question among consistent patterns and legitimates the salient themes as input for QSR NVivo 11.
... Fourthly, in the new era of globalization, innovation is a necessary tool for national economic prosperity. Global competition and information technology require governments to transform their operations and address time consuming processes (Miller, 1999). Thus, these four drivers have been the primary forces that have prompted the public sector to focus on innovation as a means of improving productivity and performance. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Innovation is considered to be a sine qua non to improve efficiency and effectiveness in government and respond to citizens' increasing demand for better services. This paper draws together literature related to innovation in the public sector. A qualitative analysis was conducted to establish the key aspects related to innovation raised by senior managers within the Australian Public Service (APS). This study used content analysis of transcripts from senior manager presentations in Innovation Month seminars from 2014 to 2016. The content indicated senior managers' perceptions of innovation in the APS in terms of four aspects: drivers of innovation; barriers to innovation; innovation characteristics; and typology of innovation. Content analysis revealed that those aspects typically associated with innovation in the APS, such as ad-hoc basis and top-down approach, have been hindered by a number of barriers within the public sector context studied. These major barriers comprise risk-averse culture, hierarchy, and the silo effect. The implications of the findings are discussed to suggest directions for further research on innovation in the public sector.
... What can be envisaged while virtual processes of meta-conceptual consciousness are developed is that computer networks become increasingly utilised and new academic social orders are expressed through these networks [27]. Students are exposed to cutting edge concepts, and researchers are forced to answer basic questions raised by students, while public service efforts keep researchers and students aware of the issues of greatest concern to society. ...
Article
The way that the academic practice in higher education universities responds to the influence of computer networks and technology will be central to the definition of their future role. The traditional metaphor of university as self-contained village is challenged as knowledge becomes widely available on the Internet and teacher–student and student–student dialogues are not bound by spatial boundaries. The paper presents four metaphoric spaces that virtual dialogues can take place in. Each of these appears to fail the criteria of creating space where knowledge that a particular individual has can be shared, recreated, and amplified through interactions with others in academic contexts. We consider the effect of three driving forces that could create alternative teacher and student roles and dialogues between them. A technology-driven shaping of virtual learning may result in auto-responsive ‘robosapiens’, a relativist societal-driven shaping of virtual learning may result in socially isolated ‘nerds’. An environment in which technology is shaped by ethical evaluation with respect to higher level (e.g. meta-conceptual) learning is desired to raise the standards of intellectual and technological talents. Such an environment is considerably different from the norms of present-day universities and the every-day roles of teachers and students.
Chapter
Enthält auch Literaturangaben zu früher veröffentlichten Fallstudien (mit * gekennzeichnet).
Chapter
Full-text available
The relationship between knowledge and wealth is often equated to the relationship between certified skills and paid employment in the form of a ‘job’. This is a limited way of defining both what people know how to do and the value added by people’s efforts. Considerable attention has been paid to different ways of accounting for broader conceptualisations of work and wealth but it has been difficult to get beyond the categories defined by the existing rules and norms of the industrial system. The existing industrial system, which includes services subject to the organisational logic of hierarchical specialisation (e.g. division of conception and execution) and scale economies (e.g. mass-standardisation), is highly dynamic. Tracking these shifting forms of skill input and valueadded output is a major and important task that naturally uses an ergodic model, i.e. one that assumes continuity in the underlying frameworks between the past and the future. The following takes a non-ergodic approach by imagining ‘change in the conditions of change’. The imaginary ‘learning intensive society’ (LIS) and the model it rests on offer one way of illustrating that there can be changes in the conditions of change in the relationship between knowledge and wealth. The outcome scenario sketched briefly imagines a future model without reference to path taken to get to this outcome, nor the probability nor desirability of such an outcome. The point is to provide policy-makers with a way of detecting emerging systemic patterns and to explore new ways of making sense of phenomena observed in the present. The point is not to offer an alternative model that serves as planning target for policies meant to get from now to some ideal future. The aim is to assist decision-makers to understand the anticipatory assumptions that underpin their choices.
Article
Full-text available
The author chaired two Expert Groups of the OECD including that on privacy, whose guidelines form the basis of the legal regimes in Australia, New Zealand and many other countries. He reviews the success of those guidelines and the defects disclosed by time and by the remarkable advances in information technology since the guidelines were adopted in 1980. He then explores the revival of interest in the protection of privacy in the courts as a common law entitlement, instancing the recent decision of the Australian High Court in the Lenah Game Meats Case. The difficulty which the common law faces in responding to the challenge of informatics is then explored by reference to the decision in Dow Jones v Gutnik concerned with liability for defamation on the Internet. Finally, the author considers two contemporary problems: genetic privacy and terrorism. On the latter, he concludes with a reminder of the need to uphold civic rights, including privacy, so as to ensure that the terrorists, although losing, do not win.
Article
The presence of information technology (IT) within the global environment has been extensively studied, but its structure and impact has not been rigorously explained. In many ways, this failure to explain IT stems from a basic lack of understanding the technology itself, both in terms of its historic development and its basic production patterns. Such an explanation is important exactly because its absence limits an analysis of global processes generally, and the discussion of “information societies and economies†in particular. If information technologies are central in structuring new global trends, then it is an empirical necessity to detail the social and economic impacts derived from such technologies. Such impacts can not be understood, or at best only partially, if the basic conceptualizations and processes underlying IT are not defined. The purpose of this outline is to step back from more macro approaches and consider information technology from first principles. The aim is to clarify and define both the informational and technological aspects of IT, then link these into considerations of the potential impact on economic and social development.
Article
Full-text available
Overall, this thesis purports to make two significant contributions to knowledge. The first is a foundational critique of political economy in the context of an emergent global knowledge economy. The second is a method for analysing evaluations in language. The relationships that give coherence to those two contributions are as follows. The widely-heralded emergence of a knowledge economy indicates that more intimate aspects of human activity have become exposed to commodification on a massive scale, specifically, activities associated with thought and language. Correspondingly, more abstract forms of value have developed as the products of thought and language have become dominant commodity forms. Historical investigation shows that value has moved from an objective category in political economy, pertaining to such substances as precious metals and land, to become situated today predominantly in “expert” expressions of language, or more precisely, their institutional contexts of production. These are now propagated and circulated on a global scale. Legal, political, and technological developments are key in the development of new, more abstract forms of labour and value, although the relationships connecting these are neither simple nor direct. They are, however, inseparably related in the trajectories that this thesis describes. Consequently they are dealt with inseparably throughout.
Book
Full-text available
The purpose of this book is twofold: it is a critique of political economic thought in the context of an emergent global knowledge economy and describes a a method, based in systemic functional language analysis, for identifying important changes in social perceptions of value. The relationships that give these coherence are as follows. The widely heralded emergence of a knowledge economy indicates that more intimate aspects of human activity have become exposed to commodification on a massive scale, specifically, activities associated with thought, language, and social relatedness. Correspondingly, more abstract forms of value have developed as the products of thinking and meaning have become dominant sources of commodities. These trends rely upon new media, and are defining features of hypercapitalism, a political economic system in which products of the most intimate aspects of human activity can be technologized, alienated, and sold as commodities.
Article
Full-text available
In this article, I show how new spaces are being prefigured for colonization in new economy policy discourses. Drawing on a corpus of 1.3 million words collected from legislatures throughout the world, I show the role of policy language in creating the foundations of an emergent form of political economy. The analysis is informed by principles from critical discourse analysis (CDA), classical political economy and critical media studies. It foregrounds a functional aspect of language called process metaphor to show how aspects of human activity are prefigured for mass commodification by the manipulation of realis and irrealis spaces. I also show how the fundamental element of any new political economy, the property element, is being largely ignored. Current moves to create a privately owned global space, which is as concrete as landed property - namely, the electromagnetic spectrum - has significant ramifications for the future of social relations in any global knowledge economy.
  • Information Technologies By
  • David A Patterson
  • George I Zysman
  • Chan
  • W S Vincent
  • Douglas B Lenat
  • Maes
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES By Patterson, David A.; Zysman, George I.; Chan, Vincent W.S.; Lenat, Douglas B.; Maes, Pattie; Laurel, Brenda; Daggatt, Russell, in: Scientific American, Vol. 273, No. 3, PP. 4871 (1995)
  • Crime In Cyberspace By
  • Stephens
CRIME IN CYBERSPACE By Stephens, Gene, in: The Futurist, Vol. 29, No. 5, PP. 2428 (1995)
  • Electronic
  • Internet By
  • Raymond Pyle
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND THE INTERNET By Pyle, Raymond, in: Communications of the ACM, Vol. 39, No. 6, PP. 2399 (1996)
  • European Information
  • Observatory
EUROPEAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OBSERVATORY 1997 By EUROBIT, European Information Technology Observatory, 1997, Frankfurt/Main, DE, (1997)