Prognostic and Predictive Value of Tumor Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Amplification in Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Paclitaxel with and without Bevacizumab; Results from ECOG 2100 Trial

Medicine, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center.
Clinical Cancer Research (Impact Factor: 8.72). 01/2013; 19(5). DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3029
Source: PubMed


Clinically validated biomarkers for anti-angiogenesis agents are not available. We have previously reported associations between candidate VEGFA single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and overall survival (OS) in E2100. The associations between tumor VEGFA amplification and outcome are evaluated here.

Experimental design:
E2100 was a phase III trial comparing paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab for patients with metastatic breast cancer. FISH to assess gene amplification status for VEGFA was conducted on paraffin-embedded tumors from 363 patients in E2100. Evaluation for association between amplification status and outcomes was conducted.

Estrogen receptor (ER)+ or progesterone receptor (PR)+ tumors were less likely to have VEGFA amplification than ER/PR- tumors (P = 0.020). VEGFA amplification was associated with worse OS (20.2 vs. 25.3 months; P = 0.013) in univariate analysis with a trend for worse OS in multivariate analysis (P = 0.08). There was a significant interaction between VEGFA amplification, hormone receptor status, and study arm. Patients with VEGFA amplification and triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) or HER2 amplification had inferior OS (P = 0.047); amplification did not affect OS for those who were ER+ or PR+ and HER2-. Those who received bevacizumab with VEGFA amplification had inferior progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.010) and OS (P = 0.042); no association was seen in the control arm. Test for interaction between study arm and VEGFA amplification with OS was not significant.

VEGFA amplification in univariate analysis was associated with poor outcomes; this was particularly prominent in HER2+ or TNBCs. Additional studies are necessary to confirm the trend for poor OS seen on multivariate analysis for patients treated with bevacizumab.

Download full-text


Available from: Guanglong Jiang, Jan 01, 2015
  • Source
    • "Two additional genotypes (VEGF-634CC and VEGF-1498TT) showed strong correlation with less Grade 3/4 hypertension in the combination arm when compared with all other genotypes combined (P = 0.005 and P = 0.022, respectively). In another correlative study of E2100, the ability for tumor VEGFA amplification to predict outcome was conducted (55). Patients with tumor VEGFA amplification had significantly worse median PFS (7.8 vs. 8.3 months; P = 0.040) and median OS (20.2 vs. 25.3 months; P = 0.013) than those whose tumors did not exhibit amplification (Table 3). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The development of new blood vessels is a crucial step in breast cancer growth, progression and dissemination, making it a promising therapeutic target. Breast cancer has a heterogeneous nature and the diversity of responsible angiogenic pathways between different tumors has been studied for many years. Inhibiting different targets in these pathways has been under investigation in preclinical and clinical studies for more than decades, among which antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor is the most studied. However, the clinical impact from antiangiogenic treatment alone or in combination with standard chemotherapeutic regimens has been relatively small till today. In this review, we summarize the most clinically relevant data from breast cancer treatment clinical trials and discuss safety and efficacy of common antiangiogenic therapies as well as biological predictive markers.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2014 · Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tumor-related angiogenesis is a complex process resulting from a delicate balance between pro and anti-angiogenic factors. Bevacizumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), was the first anti-angiogenic therapy to prove effective, in combination with chemotherapy, for treatment of several types of advanced cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) included. However, as for other types of solid malignancy, no predictive biomarkers of increased sensitivity to bevacizumab or any other anti-angiogenic drugs could be identified in NSCLC, which has had a negative affect on the cost-effectiveness of the targeted therapy performed to block the VEGF pathway. In this review we discuss the most relevant findings from clinical and correlative studies investigating the use of anti-angiogenic therapy for advanced NSCLC, focusing on the need to identify biomarkers for selection of patients suitable for anti-angiogenic therapy.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We know how important antiangiogenesis therapy can be in cancer treatment. However, it took some time before the first compound became approved. Currently, several agents are approved and used against cancer. Moreover, the possible number of clinical indications and agents that are in development is extraordinary. A lot of questions regarding angiogenesis in cancer still remain unanswered. One of the major weaknesses is the fact that most of the approved agents do not have a predictive or prognostic biomarker that can be used to tailor these novel agents in terms of inducing the best possible antitumor effect. Many of these new targeted agents inhibit several tumorigenesis pathways, but most of the time only one of these pathways is the main driver for cancer proliferation. In this article, we present the most current clinical information available in antiangiogenic therapy and the potential development in non-small-cell lung cancer.
    No preview · Article · Jul 2013 · Clinical Practice
Show more