Technical ReportPDF Available

ICARE Forum: Knowledge. Power. Access - Summary Report

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Purpose of the Forum: The ICARE forum Knowledge. Power. Access. was held on June 25, 2009 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at Langara College in Vancouver, British Columbia. The forum provided an opportunity for the ICARE team to introduce and communicate our purpose to a diverse group of stakeholders from the multicultural settlement, community, health service provider and academic sectors. Participants worked collectively to develop research questions in each of the three prioritized theme areas: 1. Immigrant Women‐Centred Chronic Disease Care Model. 2. Older Visible Minority Immigrant Grandmothers as Caregivers. 3. Community Resources for Older Immigrant Women’s Mental Health. THE STATED FORUM OBJECTIVES WERE: - To clarify how gender, age and immigration can interact to create barriers to health care access for older visible minority immigrant women. - To identify and develop research questions in each of the three prioritized topic areas. - To collectively identify and prioritize next steps for action. - To create opportunities for participants to stay involved with the project. Overview of Forum Structure: An introductory panel provided the context for the forum. Two older women from the South Asian and Chinese communities presented personal and peer‐based perspectives on health and health care access issues for older visible minority immigrant women. In the latter part of the morning participants were led through an interactive exercise to explore how constructions of gender, age, immigration and visible minority status may interact to influence individual health care experiences. For the remainder of the day, three concurrent roundtables explored each of the three prioritized theme areas. Roundtables began with panel discussions led by members of the ICARE team. Throughout the day facilitators for each group led participants through a series of exercises intended to articulate research priorities and begin to develop research questions.
Content may be subject to copyright.
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page2of41
TableofContents
TableofFigures ............................................................................................................................................................... 3
Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................................ 5
Background......................................................................................................................................................................... 7
AbouttheImmigrantOlderWomenCareAccessibilityResearchEmpowerment(ICARE)team.... 7
Whylookatoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen’shealth?.................................................................................7
ResearchFocus...................................................................................................................................................................................7
Context...................................................................................................................................................................................................7
TheICAREForum:Knowledge.Power.Access...................................................................................................... 9
PurposeoftheForum......................................................................................................................................................................9
OverviewofForumStructure......................................................................................................................................................9
Participants.......................................................................................................................................................................................10
LayingtheFoundation................................................................................................................................................. 11
IntersectionalityFramework.................................................................................................................................................... 11
ImmigrationinRelationtoWomen’sHealthandHealthCareAccess .................................................................... 12
ApproachtoStudyingHealthCareAccess .......................................................................................................................... 12
PersonalandPeer‐BasedPerspectivesofImmigrantWomen’sHealth&HealthCareAccess....................13
ConcurrentRoundtables ............................................................................................................................................15
ImmigrantWomenCentredChronicDiseaseCareModel..............................................................................15
RoundtableParticipants.............................................................................................................................................................. 15
ProblemswiththeConventionalChronicDiseaseSelf‐Management(CDSM)Model ...................................... 15
ChronicDiseaseRiskFactorsforOlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantWomen ..................................................... 16
HealthPromotingPracticesbeingusedbyOlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantWomen.................................. 17
TowardsanImmigrantWomen‐CentredChronicDiseaseCareModel..................................................................18
DevelopingaResearchFramework ....................................................................................................................................... 19
OlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantGrandmothersasCaregivers ................................................................. 20
RoundtableParticipants.............................................................................................................................................................. 20
IssuesaffectingOlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantGrandmothersasCaregivers ............................................. 21
SupportingGrandmothersasCaregivers:WhatModelsareWorking?.................................................................. 24

33
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page3of41
DevelopingaResearchFramework ....................................................................................................................................... 24
CommunityResourcesforOlderImmigrantWomen’sMentalHealth....................................................... 27
RoundtableParticipants.............................................................................................................................................................. 27
RiskFactorsforPoorMentalHealth......................................................................................................................................27
BarrierstoMentalHealthServices......................................................................................................................................... 28
SupportingPositiveMentalHealth:WhatModelsareWorkingintheCommunity? ....................................... 29
Ideas:What’sneeded?.................................................................................................................................................................. 30
DevelopingaResearchFramework ....................................................................................................................................... 30
NextSteps......................................................................................................................................................................... 32
ReferencesCited............................................................................................................................................................33
Appendices ......................................................................................................................................................................37
AppendixA:AFrameworkforWomen‐CentredHealth ............................................................................................... 37
AppendixB:ForumProgram .................................................................................................................................................... 38
AppendixC:PresenterBiographies ....................................................................................................................................... 40
TableofFigures
Figure1:TotalICAREForumParticipants...............................................................................................................................10
Figure2:ICARETeamComposition............................................................................................................................................ 10
Figure3:ImmigrantWomen‐CentredChronicDiseaseCareModelRoundtableParticipants.........................15
Figure4:OlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantGrandmothersasCaregiversRoundtableParticipants ............ 20
Figure5:CommunityResourcesforOlderImmigrantWomen’sMentalHealthRoundtableParticipants.27

44
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page4of41
REPORTPREPAREDBY
MelanieSpence,SharonKoehnandKarenKobayashi
onbehalfoftheImmigrantOlderWomen–CareAccessibilityResearchEmpowerment(ICARE)team.
September23,2009

55
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page5of41
Acknowledgements
TheICAREteamisfundedbyaTeamInfrastructureGrant(2009‐2010)fromtheWomen’sHealth
ResearchInstitute.TheICAREforumKnowledge.Power.Access.wasmadepossiblebytheadditional
fundingand/orsupportin‐kindreceivedfromtheBCHomeandCommunityResearchNetwork,the
Women’sHealthResearchNetwork,theBCNetworkofAgingResearchandLangaraCollege:
ManythanksarealsoextendedtotheICAREteam:
PrincipalInvestigators:
KarenM.Kobayashi,PhD,DepartmentofSociology/CentreonAging,UniversityofVictoria
SharonKoehn,PhD,CentreforHealthyAgingatProvidence(CHAP)/UniversityofBritish
Columbia
ResearchAssistant:
MelanieSpence,Hon.BA,CentreforHealthyAgingatProvidence(CHAP)
ICARETeamMembers:
RevaNAdler,MD,MPH,FRCPC,VancouverCoastalHealthAuthority/UniversityofBritish
Columbia
SatwinderBains,MEd,PhD(C),UniversityoftheFraserValley
JoanBottorff,PhD,RN,FCAHS,UniversityofBritishColumbiaOkanagan
DaljitGill‐Badesha,MA,DIVERSEcity
SukhdevGrewalRN,MSN,LangaraCollege
LokayataKular,DIVERSEcity
JanetKushner‐Kow,B.Sc.,MD,MEd,FRCPC,ProvidenceHealthCare,VancouverCoastalHealth
Authority,UniversityofBritishColumbia
EricLau,S.U.C.C.E.S.S.
NoreenSimmons,PhD,SLP,BCFamilyHearingResourcesSociety
SaleemSpindari,BA,MOSAIC

66
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page6of41
SpecialthanksareduetoICAREteampartnersAndreaCosentino(BCNetworkforAgingResearch
(BCNAR)),AmyJohal(BCNAR),andColleenReid(Women’sHealthResearchNetwork(WHRN))fortheir
keendirectionandassistanceinplanningtheforum.WearegratefultoElanaBrief(WHRN),Karen
Kobayashi,andColleenReidfortheirskilledfacilitationoftheroundtablediscussions,andfurthermore
toElanaandColleenformoderatingtheforum.ThankyoutoMohinderSidhuandMaggieIpforsharing
theirexperiencesandknowledgeofhealthcareaccessissuesforoldervisibleminorityimmigrant
women.Manythanksaswelltotheroundtablepanelistswhosetthegroundworkfortheday’s
discussions.Thanksareduetoourvolunteernotetakers:BaljitDhaliwal,GloriaMui,andHarshada
Pradhan.Finally,thankstoyou,ourparticipants,foryourdedication,passionandcommitmentto
improvingthehealthofoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomeninBritishColumbia.

77
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page7of41
BACKGROUND
AbouttheImmigrantOlderWomenCareAccessibilityResearchEmpowerment
(ICARE)team
Whylookatoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen’shealth?
ThenumberofolderimmigrantwomeninBritishColumbiaisgrowing,butresearchisnotkeepingpace.
ThelargestproportionofwomeninthisgroupcomesfromChinaandIndia.Mostaresponsoredbytheir
families,whichrendersthemfinanciallydependentfortenyears.Manyarewidows.Oftentheyprovide
much‐neededchildcareservicesfortheirgrandchildren.Thesefactorsalonecanmakeaccesstohealth
careverychallenging.Suchchallengesneedtobeunderstoodinthecontextoftheconsiderable
discriminationthatmanyofthesewomenhavefacedthroughouttheirlives.Limitedaccesstoeducation,
paidworkopportunities,andfreedomoutsideofthehomehasleftmanywithouttheskillstoovercome
suchbarriers.Furthermore,asoldervisibleminoritiesinanunfamiliarculturalenvironmenttheyare
alsosusceptibletodiscriminationbasedontheirage,genderandskincolour.
ResearchFocus:
ThepurposeoftheICAREteamistodeveloparesearchprogramthatexploresthemyriadwaysinwhich
intersectingoppressions,experiencedbeforeandafterimmigration,influenceaccesstohealthcareby
oldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen.
Context:
Ethnoculturalminorityolderadultsareneglectedinbothresearchandsocialandhealthpolicybecause
theirnumbersarethoughttobetooinsignificanttoconstitutea‘problem’.Genderedanalysesofthisage
grouparelikewiseextremelyrare.Buthealthinequitiesareoftenexperiencedfarmoredramaticallyand
atgreatcosttoindividuals,familiesandhealthcaresystemsbysuchminorities,indicatingtheneedto
directresearcheffortstoaddressingthosewiththehighestunmetneeds.Moreover,thenumbersareno
longerinsignificant.OlderadultsrepresentthefastestgrowingsegmentoftheCanadianpopulationand
averagemorethantwotimesthenumberofphysiciancontactsperyearthandopersonsundertheageof
65.1Althoughtheagingprocesscanbepositive,italsopresentschallengesrelatedtobothphysicaland
sociallossesoverthelifecourse.Theexperienceofsuchlossesdiffersconsiderablyaccordingtovariables
suchasethnicity,gender,andimmigrationstatus.
IntheGreaterVancouverregionin2006,one‐third(31%)ofthepopulationaged65+werevisible
minorities,80%ofwhomwereChinese(56%)andSouthAsian(24%).2Between2002and2006,65%of
foreign‐bornolderadultsarrivedinB.C.withoutofficiallanguageability.3Refugeesaccountedforonlya
smallproportion(4%)ofimmigrantolderadultsduringthisperiod;themajority(88%)arrivedas
FamilyClassimmigrants;usuallyasparentsandgrandparentssponsoredbychildrenandgrandchildren.
Bothclassesofimmigrantolderadultshavepoorerhealththanlong‐termimmigrantsandtheCanadian‐
bornpopulation.4‐7
InBC,almostone‐thirdofFamilyClassimmigrantsareaged50+and60%arefemale.8Comparedto
immigrantstoCanadaoverall,arrivalsinthisclasshavelowerlevelsofeducationandEnglishlanguage

88
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page8of41
ability.IndiahasconsistentlyaccountedforthelargestproportionofFamilyClassimmigrantstoBC(30%
from2000‐04),withChinabeingsecond.Overall,however,theChinesehaveconstitutedthelargest
proportion(28%)ofallimmigrantolderadultstoBCfrom2002‐2006;thosefromIndiawerethesecond
largestgroup(18%).3

99
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page9of41
TheICAREForum:Knowledge.Power.Access.
PurposeoftheForum:
TheICAREforumKnowledge.Power.Access.washeldonJune25,2009from10:00a.m.to4:00p.m.at
LangaraCollegeinVancouver,BritishColumbia.
TheforumprovidedanopportunityfortheICAREteamtointroduceandcommunicateourpurposetoa
diversegroupofstakeholdersfromthemulticulturalsettlement,community,healthserviceproviderand
academicsectors.Participantsworkedcollectivelytodevelopresearchquestionsineachofthethree
prioritizedthemeareas:
1. ImmigrantWomen‐CentredChronicDiseaseCareModel.
2. OlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantGrandmothersasCaregivers.
3. CommunityResourcesforOlderImmigrantWomen’sMentalHealth.
THESTATEDFORUMOBJECTIVESWERE:
Toclarifyhowgender,ageandimmigrationcaninteracttocreatebarrierstohealthcare
accessforoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen.
Toidentifyanddevelopresearchquestionsineachofthethreeprioritizedtopicareas.
Tocollectivelyidentifyandprioritizenextstepsforaction.
Tocreateopportunitiesforparticipantstostayinvolvedwiththeproject.
OverviewofForumStructure:
Anintroductorypanelprovidedthecontextfortheforum.TwoolderwomenfromtheSouthAsianand
Chinesecommunitiespresentedpersonalandpeer‐basedperspectivesonhealthandhealthcareaccess
issuesforoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen.
Inthelatterpartofthemorningparticipantswereledthroughaninteractiveexercisetoexplorehow
constructionsofgender,age,immigrationandvisibleminoritystatusmayinteracttoinfluenceindividual
healthcareexperiences.
Fortheremainderoftheday,threeconcurrentroundtablesexploredeachofthethreeprioritizedtheme
areas.RoundtablesbeganwithpaneldiscussionsledbymembersoftheICAREteam.Throughouttheday
facilitatorsforeachgroupledparticipantsthroughaseriesofexercisesintendedtoarticulateresearch
prioritiesandbegintodevelopresearchquestions.

1010
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page10of41
Participants:
Therewere60participantsinattendance.Participantsreflectedadiversityofsectorsandpositions,
includinghealthprofessionals,multiculturalsettlementworkers,olderadults,policymakersand
researchers.MostparticipantscamefromBC’sLowerMainland;howevertherewasalsorepresentation
fromtheFraserValley,theInteriorofBC,andVancouverIsland.
ThefollowingdiagramillustratestheparticipantbreakdownbysectorforthetotalnumberofICARE
forumparticipants.
32%
22%
10%
3%
17%
8%
8% ICARETeam&Partners
Research ers
GovernmentRepresentatives
Front‐lineHealthServiceProviders
MulticulturalSettlement&
CommunityAgencyWorkers
OlderAdults
HealthAdministrators
Figure1:TotalICAREForumParticipants(n=60)
47%
37%
16%
ICARETeamMembers
ICAREPartners
ICAREForumVolunteers
Figure2:ICARETeamComposition(n=19)

1111
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page11of41
LayingtheFoundation
ThefollowingconceptualframeworksreflecttheICAREteam’sapproachtohealthcareaccessforolder
visibleminorityimmigrantwomen,andserveasatheoreticalgroundingforeachofthethreeroundtable
topics.
IntersectionalityFramework:
Thesociallossesoftenassociatedwithagingaremorefrequentlyandacutelyexperiencedwhenthey
intersectwithgender,visibleminorityandimmigrantstatus.Accesstohealthservices,employment,
childcareandotherkeyresourcesnecessaryforpromotingandsustaininghealtharedeterminedbythe
dynamicintersectionofsociodemographiccategoriessuchasgender,ageandimmigrationstatus.
Intersectionalityconsidersthesimultaneousinteractionsbetweenmultipledimensionsofsocialidentity
(forexample,sex,gender,age,visibleminorityandimmigrationstatus)thatarecontextualizedwithin
broadersystemsofpower,dominationandoppression(forexample,sexism,ageismandracism).9
FortheICAREteam,anintersectionalapproachbehoovesustoaskhowgender,age,ethnicity,visible
minorityandimmigrationstatusinteracttocreatebarrierstohealthandsocialcareaccessforolder
visibleminorityimmigrantwomen.
Althougholderwomenareunderrepresentedinhealthresearch,10considerableevidenceexiststolink
healthinequitieswiththesocialdeterminantsofhealth,amongwhichgenderandculturalfactorshave
cross‐cuttinginfluences.Biologicaldifferencesintersectwithsocio‐politicalconstructionsofgenderto
producehealthinequitiesthatbecome,forexample,“violenceagainstwomen,lackofaccesstoresources
andopportunities,andlackofdecision‐makingpoweroverone’sownhealth.”11
ForolderChineseandSouthAsianimmigrantwomen,theprocessofracializationgreatlyimpactshealth
andqualityoflife.Thesocialcategoryofraceandthecorrespondingsocialproductionofracialidentities
interactwithotherfundamentaldeterminantsofhealthsuchasethnicity,age,gender,andimmigrant
statustoimpactanindividual’sabilitytoaccessthekeysocialresourcesnecessaryforhealthpromotion
andmaintenance.10Inpracticalterms,racismaffectshealththroughsystemicandindividual‐level
occurrencesofdiscrimination,marginalization,andsusceptibilitytopoverty,tonameafew.10
EthnicityisdefinedbytheWomen’sHealthResearchNetworkas:“…agroup’ssharedculturalheritage
basedoncommonancestry,language,music,foodandreligion.”10Likerace,ethnicityisafundamental
determinantofhealth.Culturalpracticesontheirowndonotnecessarilydeterminehealth;ratheritis
thetreatmentofcultural/ethnicdifferenceswithin,forexample,ourhealthcaresystemthat
(re)produceshealthinequalitiesforethnoculturalminorities.
ApplyingIntersectionalitytoResearchDesign:
Inpracticalterms,anintersectionalperspectiveinformshowresearchisdesigned,fromthetypesof
questionsweasktoprocessesofknowledgetranslationandexchange.
Whendevelopingaresearchquestion,anintersectionalityframeworkimplicateswhatisoftenreferredto
asa“bottom‐up”orinductiveapproachthatrecognizesandvalidatesanindividual’sknowledgeand
authorityovertheirownuniquesetofexperiences.9Researchquestionsshouldfurthermoreaimtobring
historicallymarginalizedperspectivesandexperiencestotheforefront.9

1212
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page12of41
Thequestionofhowknowledgeistranslatedintoactioniscriticalwithinanintersectionalapproachto
research.Intersectionalityencouragestheinvolvementofmultipleanddiversestakeholders;assuch,
plansforknowledgetranslationandexchangeshouldbedevelopedcollaborativelybetweenthese
groups.9
ImmigrationinRelationtoWomen’sHealthandHealthCareAccess:
Theimpactoftheprocessofimmigrationonoldervisibleminoritywomen’shealthisdifficultto
disentanglefromotherfundamentaldeterminantsofhealth.10Itisclear,however,thatoppressions
experiencedearlierinlifebythiscohortofolderimmigrantwomenoftenleavethemwithlowlevelsof
socialcapital(e.g.lackofeducation,experienceoutsideofthedomesticsphere,andilliteracy)12,13thatin
turninteractwithethnicityandotherdeterminantsofhealthtoinfluencetheresettlementexperience.
Theimmigrationexperienceitselfcriticallyinfluenceshealth.The“resettlementstress,newpathogens,
poverty,inter‐racialandinter‐generationalconflictandfamilyseparation”commontotheexperienceof
manyimmigrantscanexertaheavytollonthephysicaland,mostespecially,thementalhealthof
immigrants.14Theintersectionofgenderandtheimmigrationexperiencerenderswomenespecially
vulnerabletopsychologicaldistress.15
Asimmigrants,womenencounternewformsofoppressionbasedontheirimmigrantstatus,racialization
andstatuswithinthefamilywhichcanrenderthemvulnerabletosocialisolationandloneliness,16,17
familyconflict(possiblyevenabuseandneglect),16‐19andeconomicinsecurity.20,21Thesefactorsinturn
havebeenfoundtonegativelyinfluencehealth.22,23
ApproachtoStudyingHealthCareAccess:
Thehealthinequitiesofolderimmigrantwomenhighlighttheneedtobetterunderstandtheirunique
healthcareaccessexperiences.However,theconceptofhealthcareaccessisextremelycomplexandhas
beenfraughtwithinaccurateassumptions.Studieshaveshown,forexample,thatlong‐heldbeliefsby
providersthatcertainvisibleminoritypopulations“takecareoftheirown”,resultinginlowerformal
serviceneeds,isflawed,andthatthisbeliefitselfcaneffectivelylimitaccessbyshiftingtheburdenof
responsibilitytofamilycaregivers.24‐27Likegenderstereotyping,suchracializedandculturalist
explanationsofneedoperateasabarriertohealthcareaccessforoldervisibleminorityimmigrant
women.
TheICAREteamhasadoptedarecently‐developedmodelonaccesstohealthcarebyvulnerable
populationsthatidentifiesmultipleintersectingpointsalongthecontinuumofcareatwhichhealthcare
accessisnegotiatedandcanbecompromised.27‐29Thesevendimensionsofthemodelincludethe
person’sself‐identificationoftheneedforcare,theirabilitytoidentify,locateandgettothecarethey
need,theinteractionsbetweenpatientandproviders,involvingboththepatient’spresentationoftheir
claimforcareandtheprovider’sassessmentofthatclaimthatmayormaynotresultinappropriate
treatmentorfollow‐up,thepatient’sdecisiontoacceptorrejectthetreatmentorreferral,theextentto
whichparticularservicesareaccessiblerelativetotheresources(suchastime,money,andknowledge)
availabletopatients,andspecificlocal(forexample,geographic)andpolicylevelfactorsinfluencingcare
options.Itisourbeliefthatthismodelholdsgreatvalueforfacilitatingacomprehensiveandsystematic
understandingofhealthcareaccessforethnoculturalminorityolderwomen.

1313
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page13of41
PersonalandPeerBasedPerspectivesofImmigrantWomen’sHealth&HealthCareAccess:
Aspartof“layingthefoundation”fortheICAREforumtwospeakers,MohinderSidhuandMaggieIp,
providedpersonalandpeer‐basedperspectivesonSouthAsianandChineseolderimmigrantwomen’s
healthandhealthcareaccessissues,respectively.Theirpresentationsaresummarizedinthearticle
belowpublishedbytheGeorgiaStraightnewspaperonJuly9th,2009.30

1414
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page14of41


1515
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page15of41
CONCURRENTROUNDTABLES
ImmigrantWomenCentredChronicDiseaseCareModel
RoundtableParticipants:
24%
20%
16%
4%
12%
12%
12%
ICARETeam&Partners
Researchers
GovernmentRepresentatives
Front‐lineHealth Service
Providers
MulticulturalSettlement&
CommunityAgencyWorkers
OlderAdults
HealthAdministrators
Figure3:ImmigrantWomenCentredChronicDiseaseCareModelRoundtableParticipants(n=25)
ProblemswiththeConventionalChronicDiseaseSelfManagement(CDSM)Model:
TheChronicDiseaseSelf‐ManagementPrograminBritishColumbia(CDSMP)teachespatientsthe
practicalskillsneededtocopewithandmanagetheirchronicdiseases.31Coursesareledbytrained“lay
leaders”whomeetwithgroupsof10to12peoplewithchronicconditionsfortwoandahalfhourseach
weekforasix‐weekperiod.31Individualsaregivenlessonsonperformingactivitiesofdailylivingsuchas
healthyeating,exercisingandcommunicationskills.31TheCDSMmodelisintendedtosupporttraditional
patienteducationprovidedbyhealthprofessionalsinprimarycaresettings.
ParticipantsinthisroundtableexpressedconcernthattheconventionalCDSMmodelfailstoconsiderthe
uniqueneedsofethnoculturalminoritywomenwithchronicdiseases,specificallySouthAsianand
Chineseolderwomen.PanelistsJoanBottorffandSukiGrewalpresentedaschematicframeworkfor
discussingthecontextual,interrelateddimensionsofwomen’shealth(seeAppendixA).Inadditiontothe
keydeterminantsofhealthsuchaseducation,incomeandbiology/genetics,awomen‐centredhealth
frameworkincludesconsiderationsofwomen’sinvolvementandparticipationinservicedesignand
delivery,preferencesinobtainingcareandempowerment.32
Theoverarchingquestionsthatemergedfromthisroundtablewere:(1)Istheframeworkforwomen‐
centredhealthtrulypractical?(2)Whatwoulditlookliketoimplementalloftheseoptionsinpractice?

1616
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page16of41
Whenconsideredinconjunctionwithanintersectionalityapproach,thewomen‐centredhealth
frameworkprovidesastartingpointforguidingpolicymakersastohowthehealthcaresystemmight
bestrespondtotheuniquechronicdiseasemanagementneedsofoldervisibleminorityimmigrant
women.Thefirststepistofindoutwhatthoseneedsare,understandingthattheywillbeshapedbythe
manywaysinwhichculture,ethnicity,age,immigrationstatus,visibleminoritystatus,andgendercan
convergetodetermineanindividualwoman’suniquehealthexperiences.Appropriatehealthsystem
responsestoolderSouthAsianandChinesewomen’schroniccareneedswillinvolve:(1)gender‐
inclusivemethodsofresearch;(2)gender‐inclusivecurriculainmedicalschools;(3)knowledgeofhow
systemicinequalitiesimpactwomen’shealth;and(4)recognitionofservicedeliveryprocessesthat
engageandempowerwomen.32
ChronicDiseaseRiskFactorsforOlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantWomen:
Chronicdiseaseriskfactorsforoldervisibleminoritywomenwerediscussedwithinthecontextofthe
entireimmigrationexperience,frompre‐topost‐immigration.Themajorityofdatabroughtintothe
roundtablediscussionwasfromworkdonebythepanelistswithintheSouthAsiancommunity.Future
workinggroupdiscussionsshouldstrivetoadditionallyincludeinformationfromtheChinese
community.
Pre‐ImmigrationHealthStatus:
Aspreviouslydiscussed,oppressionsexperiencedbyoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomenpre‐
immigrationoftenleavethemwithlowlevelsofsocialcapitalthatinturninfluencehealthoutcomes
throughtheresettlementexperience.
Immigrantwomenareatgreaterriskthanmenfordevelopingcertainchronicdiseases.Forexample,
SouthAsianwomenareatahigherriskthanmenfordevelopingheartdisease.33,34TheHeartandStroke
Foundationrecognizesthistrendandiscurrentlylookingtocollaborateonresearchtoexaminethis
issue.
InIndia,53%ofdeathsarerelatedtochronicdiseases.35IndiahasthehighestrateofTypeIIDiabetesin
theworld,34anddiabetes‐relatedvisuallossiscommonlyseeninSouthAsianwomen.36
Post‐ImmigrationRiskFactors:
Therearemanybarriersoperatingonindividual,communityandorganizationallevelswithinthepost‐
immigrationcontextthatpredisposeoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomentodevelopingchronic
diseases,andmoreovercreatedifficultyincontrollingtheprogressionofchronicdiseases.
Languagebarriersoftenpreventolderimmigrantwomenfromunderstandinghowtonavigatethehealth
systemandaccessappropriatehealthservices,suchasmedicalspecialists.Inthedoctor’soffice,language
barriersrequireinterpretation,ataskmostoftenperformedbyfamilymembersalthoughthisisfarfrom
ideal.Thedisclosureofintimatehealthconcernstofamilymembersinthedoctor’sofficeisproblematic
forsomeolderimmigrantwomendependingontheage,genderandnatureoftheirrelationshipwiththe
familymemberwhoisinterpreting.Olderwomenmayalsobedependentonfamilymembersfor
transportationtoandfromthedoctor’soffice.

1717
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page17of41
OlderSouthAsianandChineseimmigrantwomenmayfurthermorebeunawareofexistinghealth
services.Forexample,manyofthesewomenarenotawareoftheavailabilityofcancerscreeningtests.
Additionalbarriersmaypresentevenwhenthereisanawarenessoftheseservices;forexample,the
genderofthecareprovidermaybesignificantforsomewomenwhoareuncomfortablespeakingabout
theirhealthconcernstoamalephysician,particularlyayoungerone.37
Manyolderimmigrantwomenmaynothavethetimeorresourcestoseekoutthehealthservicesthey
need,particularlyiftheyaresponsoredbytheirfamiliestolookaftergrandchildrenandperform
householdchores.Theseresponsibilitiesoftenmakeitdifficultforolderwomentofindthetimetoaccess
notonlyhealthservices,butbroadersocialsupportservicessuchascommunitygroupsthatsupportthe
developmentofgoodhealth.
FortheSouthAsiancommunityinBC,changingfood/nutritionhabitscanleavewomenatriskfor
developingdiabetes,heartdiseaseandotherchronicdiseases.Richfoodsareeasilyavailableand
affordableinCanada,incontrasttothesimplerfoodsthatmainlycomprisepeople’sdietsinIndia.In
Canadarichfoodsbecomeassociatedwithstatus,andpeople’sintakeofthesefoodsincreases.
Theself‐caremodelpresentsmanyassumptionsaboutanindividual’sabilitytonavigatethehealth
systemthatmaynotbetrueformanyoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen.Forthosewhohave
limitedmeansoftransportation,moneyandEnglishlanguageskills,systemicbarrierstohealthcare
accessexist.Traditionalhealthcaremodelsareliteracy‐centred,andthereisalackofresourcesfor
womentoknowwheretogoforhealthpromotionanddiseasemanagement.Questionsastowhoto
contactfordiseasemanagementandwhatservicesareavailableareprevalent.Difficultiesnavigatingand
accessinghealthservicesmeansthatforsomewomenchronicdiseasemaygoundiagnosedand/or
unmanaged.
HealthPromotingPracticesbeingusedbyOlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantWomen:
Religiouscentresprovideanimportantspaceforhealthpromotionamongolderimmigrantwomen.For
SouthAsianwomen,weeklyvisitstothetempleprovideanopportunitytosocializewithpeerswhilealso
addressingspiritualhealthneeds,combatingthesocialisolationexperiencedbymanyasaresultoftheir
householdandfamilyresponsibilities.
Someolderimmigrantwomenalsochoosetopracticetraditionalformsofhealthmaintenance.38Taichiis
oneexampleofatraditionalformofexercisethatagrowingnumberofolderChinesewomenpractice.
Communitycentresandneighbourhoodhousesareotherplaceswhereolderwomenmaysocializeand
findsupportamongpeers.Variouswomen’sgroupshelpaddresswomen’sphysical,socialand
psychologicalhealthneeds.Forexample,women’s‘walkinggroups’helpthemtogetoutofthehouseand
exercisewhilesocializingatthesametime.Manywomenareaccessinghealthservicesthroughsuch
‘informal’meansbyapproachingfamilyandfriendstogettheappropriateinformation.19
Forallofthesehealthpromotingpracticesundertakenbyolderimmigrantwomentherearealsobarriers
–manyofthemstructural.Forexample,whilecommunitycentresmayoffersupportgroups,older
womenareoftenunabletofindthetime,transportationandmoneyneededtoparticipateincommunity
programming.

1818
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page18of41
TowardsanImmigrantWomenCentredChronicDiseaseCareModel:
Throughoutthecourseofthedaythegroupbegantodiscussthenecessaryelementsofachronicdisease
caremodeltailoredtosuittheneedsofolderChineseandSouthAsianimmigrantwomen.
WhatModelsareWorking?
DiseasemanagementclinicsarepopularwithSouthAsianandChinesecommunitiesbutfundingis
limited.Paptest/breastexamclinicsinitiatedintheSouthAsiancommunitywereverysuccessful:
womentendedtobringupmanyotherhealthproblemswhenbeingexaminedbyfemalephysicianswho
spoketheirlanguage.Thebiggestdrawbackoftheseclinicswasthattherewasnocapacityormandate
forhealthproviderstodealwithwomen’sbroaderhealthconcerns.39
Fundedservicesandprogramsthatareofferedthroughtrustedcommunityorganizationshavebeen
successfulinrecruitingolderimmigrantwomen.Forexample,apilotscreeningprograminCalgarytested
forcardiovasculardiseaseamongSouthAsianindividualsinfourdifferentlanguages.40Theindividuals
performingthescreeningtestswerespecifically‐trainedlayvolunteersfromtheIndo‐Canadian
community.40,41Ofthosescreened,81%ofhighriskwomenand82%ofhighriskmenfollowedupwith
theirfamilyphysicianswithinayear;however,only45.5%ofhighriskwomenand30%ofhighriskmen
wereactuallyreferredtoaspecialist.41Ofthosereferred,87%ofwomenand100%ofmenattendedthe
appointment.41Testswereofferedatthetempleduringevenings;interestinglysimilartestsofferedat
communitycentreswerenotaseffectiveinrecruitingpeopletotheprogram.
Self‐careoptionssuchasyogacanworkifprovidedinanenvironmentfamiliartowomen(suchasthe
temple).
RequirementsforanImmigrantWomen‐CentredChronicDiseaseCareModel:
Thegroupdevelopedasetofquestionstoassesstheappropriatenessofanypotentialchronicdisease
managementprogramforoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen.
ISTHEMODEL…
Women‐centred?
Ethnoculturally‐centred?
Family‐focused?
Life‐course‐focused?
Locatedwithinthecommunity?
Reciprocity‐based?

1919
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page19of41
DevelopingaResearchFramework:
Thegroupaimedtoproduceaseriesofinitialresearchquestionsandaccompanyingresearchstrategies
todevelopanimmigrantwomen‐centredmodelofchronicdiseasemanagement.Thesequestionswill
serveasthestartingpointforamorein‐depthdiscussionleadingtothedevelopmentofaresearch
proposal(s)inthisarea.
ResearchObjectives:
Tocreateservicesandprovideimprovedaccesstowantedservices(promotion,preventionand
treatment)thatwillhelptoimprovethehealthandwell‐beingofolderSouthAsianandChinese
immigrantwomeninBritishColumbia.
Todeterminewhatservicesareneeded,howtocreateandsustainaccesstotheseservices,and
howtoachieveandevaluatesuccessful(desired)outcomes.
RESEARCHQUESTIONS:
1. Whatarethehealthcareneedsofolderimmigrantwomenlivingwith
chronicdiseaseandhowmighttheybeaddressed?
2. Whatisthemostappropriatemodeltoincreaseaccesstochronic
diseasemanagementhealthservicesforoldervisibleminority
immigrantwomen?
3. Whatkindofcommunity‐based/community‐ownedserviceswouldbe
mosteffectiveinimprovingaccesstochronicdiseasemanagement
servicesforoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen?
PreliminaryDiscussionofResearchMethods:
Preferredresearchmethodscitedbythegroupincludedvariouscollaborativeresearchstrategies,suchas
ParticipatoryActionResearch(PAR).Modelsofserviceprovisionmustbeevaluatedand/ordevelopedin
partnershipwithimmigrantwomen,theirfamiliesandcommunitiesinordertoensuretheirrelevancy.
Processesofknowledgetranslationandexchangearelikewiseenhancedthroughacollaborative
approachtoresearch.
Acomparativestudytomeasuretheeffectivenessofexistingprogramsholdspotentialforthistopic.For
example,theCDSMPhaslaunchedpeertrainingsessionsformembersofthePunjabicommunityin
Vancouver.TheseindividualswillfacilitateworkshopsspecificallydesignedforthePunjabicommunity.
Thismodelcouldbecomparedwith,forexample,acommunityprograminRichmondwherepatients
diagnosedwithchronicdiseasesareimmediatelyconnectedtocommunitynetworks(forexample
volunteersandspecialists)forassistanceinmanagingtheirchronicdisease(s).

2020
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page20of41
OlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantGrandmothersasCaregivers
RoundtableParticipants:
31%
11%
5%
0%
31%
11%
11% ICARETeam&Partners
Rese archers
GovernmentRepresentatives
Front‐lineHealthService
Providers
MulticulturalSettlement&
CommunityAgencyWorkers
OlderAdults
HealthAdministrators
Figure4:OlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantGrandmothersasCaregiversRoundtableParticipants(n=19)
ReunitingimmigrantfamiliesisanimportantgoalinCanadianpolicy.42Olderadultscomprisedalmost
one‐halfofallfamilyclassimmigrantstoCanadain2006.43InBC,88%ofolderimmigrantsarrivedunder
theFamilyClasscategorybetween2002and2006.44
WhenanolderrelativeissponsoredundertheFamilyClassimmigrationcategory,thesponsormakesan
unconditionalundertakingoffinancialsupportforaperiodoftenyearstotheMinisterofCitizenshipand
Immigration.ThisisalongerperiodthanforanyotherFamilyClassgroup.
Thefinancialdependencyofolderrelativesontheirfamilysponsorsoftenleavesthemunderagreat
senseofobligation.Sponsoredgrandparents–andinparticulargrandmothers–areoftenexpectedto
provideunpaidchildcareservicesforgrandchildren.Asgrandmothersageandbecomeunabletocook,
cleanandtakecareoftheirgrandchildren,theyareincreasinglyvulnerabletodepression,isolationand
abuse.
TherearenumerousissuestoaddressforolderSouthAsianandChineseimmigrantwomenascaregivers
tograndchildren.Languagebarriersaresignificant,andrequireservicesandresources.Although
servicesareprovidedinmultiplelanguages,transportation,costandotherbarriersstillexistforsome
families.Elderabusehasbeendocumentedinbothcommunities,andrequiresactiontoreducethe
vulnerabilitythatunderpinsabuse.Whengrandmothersneedhelp,whetherforabuseoranykindof
assistance,theyoftendonotknowwheretobegintoask,andwhattypesofservicesareavailable.

2121
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page21of41
Thereiscurrentlyalackofresearchtounderstandhowcaregivingrolesaffectvisibleminorityimmigrant
grandmother’shealthandqualityoflife.Futureresearchshouldinvestigatehowsocialisolation,financial
barriers,familydynamics,andthesponsorshipsysteminteracttoimpactthehealthofgrandmothersas
caregivers.
IssuesaffectingOlderVisibleMinorityImmigrantGrandmothersasCaregivers:
Thediagrambelowsummarizesthemultipleissuesaffectingthehealthofoldervisibleminority
immigrantgrandmothers.Theseissuesareunderstoodbythegrouptobeintersecting,dynamicandnon‐
hierarchical.
SponsorshipSystem:
Sponsorshippoliciesandpracticescreatedifficultconditionsforfamilies.Olderrelativesarerendered
financiallydependentontheirfamilysponsorsforanobligatoryten‐yearperiod.Duringtheinitial
dependencyperiod,olderadultsmaynotbeeligibleforpublicpensionssuchastheAllowance,OldAge
SecurityortheGuaranteedIncomeSupplement,subsidizedhousingorhousingsubsidies,orotherlocal
benefitssuchasreducedfarebuspasses.
Manyolderimmigrantsremaineconomicallydisadvantagedevenaftersponsorshipendsbecauseofthe
waytheresidencycriterionforOldAgeSecurityiscalculated.ImmigrantsfromSouthAsia,forexample,

2222
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page22of41
areatagreaterdisadvantagethanimmigrantsfromcountriessuchasAustralia,NewZealandandthe
UnitedKingdomsinceCanadahasreciprocalagreementsonsocialsecuritywiththesecountries.45These
agreementscanhaveabeneficialeffectonresidencycredits,whichdeterminetheeventualamountofOld
AgeSecuritythepersonwillreceive.
Dependentontheirsponsorsineveryrespect,sponsoredolderadultsseldomhaveaccurateinformation
abouttheirrights.Theyareoftenfearfulthattheirsponsorshipcanbewithdrawn,andtheydonotknow
wheretoturnforhelpifproblemsdooccur.13
Accesstohealthcareisalsoaffectedbytheolderadults’extremedependencyontheirsponsorsfor
translationofwritteninformation,andforridesandinterpretingatmedicalappointments.Thepolicy
alsorenderssponsoredolderadultsineligibleformanyservices,suchasrehabilitationandlong‐term
care,duringtheirten‐yeardependencyperiod.27
Abuse:
Olderadultsareatgreatriskofabusebysomeoneknowntothem.46Adultchildrenareresponsiblefor
morethan35%ofabuseperpetratedagainstolderparents.46Therearetwocomponentsofthelegal
obligationtoprovideforallofthesponsoredolderadult’sneedsthatsignificantlyincreasestheir
susceptibilitytoabuseorneglect.16
Thefirstofthesecomponentsisthelengthoftimeofthesponsorshipobligationduringwhichthe
financialstatusofthesponsorandthehealthstatusofeitherthesponsoredolderadultorthesponsor
maydeclinethroughnofaultoftheirown.Theresultmaybeextremefinancialhardshipandsometimes
emotionalorphysicalabuse,orpassiveoractiveneglect.Onceasponsoredgrandmotherqualifiesforher
publicpension,shemayexperienceabuseintheformofpressuretosignoverherpensionchequetoher
family.
Thesecondcomponentofsponsorship‐relatedpoliciesthatmayincreasethepotentialofabuseisthe
intensificationofdependencyandresultantpowerimbalancebetweenfamilymembersthatthepolicies
invoke.Thedependencyofgrandmothersontheirfamilysponsorsleavesthemsusceptibletomany
formsofabuse.Whileabusiveactsareoftenthoughtofasphysical,manygrandmothersmayalsosuffer
specifictypesofpsychological/emotionalabusesuchasbeingleftoutoffamilyfunctions.46,47
Identity:
Theveryrealsituationofdependencyresultsinthelossofstatuswithinthefamilystructureforsome
olderimmigrantwomenwhosefamilialrolebecomesdefinedthroughcaregivingtasks.13Onabroader
socialscalethelossofstatusisalsoexperiencedbyoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomenthroughthe
combinedeffectsofracism,sexismandageism.
Theidentityofgrandparentsisoftenconstructedthroughtheirroleintheintergenerationaltransmission
ofknowledge,cultureandvalues–aconceptreferredtoas“generativity.”Recentresearchhasproposed
thatthevariouschallenges(forexample,acculturation)thatemergethroughtheprocessofimmigration
mayimpactthisparticularexpressionofgrandparentidentity.48

2323
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page23of41
Language:
AlackofEnglishskillscreateschallengesforolderimmigrantwomen.Ascaregiverstograndchildren,
immigrantgrandmothersexperienceadditionalpressuretoachievecompetencyinEnglish.Thepressure
tolearnEnglishasoneaspectofacculturationmayproducefeelingsoflossofcultureandits
transmissiontograndchildren.Asameanstoworkthroughthis,theroleandidentityofSouthAsianand
Chinesegrandmothersmaybetoencouragegrandchildrentospeakbothlanguages.
RoleofFamily:
FamilyisaninvaluableresourceforolderimmigrantstoCanada.Beyondlegalobligations,familiesare
abletoprovideaccesstocommunity–bothformallyandinformally–andhelpgrandparentstonavigate
healthandsocialservices.
Unfortunately,familymayalsobeasourceofconflictforgrandparents.Thesponsorshiprelationship
createsdifficulttermsfortherelationshipbetweenolderrelativesandtheirfamilysponsors.The
situationofdependencyforgrandparentscreatespowerdifferentialsthataredifficulttonavigate.
Differentparentingstylesbetweengrandparentsandtheiradultchildrenisasourceoffamilyconflict.
Grandparentshavedifferentideasofhowtoparentandprepareyoungchildrenforschoolbasedontheir
ownexperiencesofchild‐rearingintheircountryoforigin;howeverinanewfamilyandcommunity
contextmanyfeellostandparentsbecomefrustrated.Grandchildrenobservetheconflictingauthority
betweentheirparentsandgrandparentsandreactaccordingly.
Insomecases,thesponsorshiprelationshipbreaksdown.Declarationofsponsorshipbreakdownisan
infractionofthesponsor’slegalundertaking.Unlesssponsoredolderadultshaveincomeorother
relativeswillingtosupportthem,theymustapplyforsocialassistance,aprocessthatvariesconsiderably
acrossCanadaandwhichisbynomeansguaranteed.16
SouthAsianwomenparticipantsnotedina2005studybyGrewaletal.19thattheyexperienced
unexpectedroleschangeswithintheirfamiliespost‐immigration.Forexample,olderwomennotedthat
intheirpost‐immigrationCanadianfamilycontext,theyfeltobligatedtoprovidechildcareandother
householdservices,evenattheexpenseoftheirownhealth.
ShiftingExperiencesasChildrenAge:
Inmuchoftheworkdoneonimmigrantgrandmothersascaregivers,thefocusistypicallyonthe
experiencesofgrandmotherstoyounggrandchildren.Howdocaregivingexperiencesshiftas
grandchildrengrowolder?Intergenerationaltransitionsmayproduceconflict.Arethereanynew
servicesrequiredtoprovidefortheseshiftingneeds?
Isolation:
Manyconditionsofisolationexistforgrandmothersascaregivers.Caregivingresponsibilitiesinpart
determineagrandmother’sabilitytoestablishasocialexistence,whetherthroughthecreationof
informalsupportnetworksorthroughaccessingavailableprogramsandservices.
InlargeurbancentressuchasVancouver,theexistenceof‘ethnicenclaves’meansthatwhentheyare
abletomovearound,olderwomenareoftenrelegatedtooneparticularareaofthecity.Inruralsettings,

2424
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page24of41
alackofneighbourscreatessubstantialisolation–bothgeographicandsocial–forolderimmigrant
women.
CaregiversofChildrenwithHealthChallenges:
EmpiricalevidencefromDr.NoreenSimmonsoftheBCFamilyHearingResourceSocietyrevealsthat
grandparentstochildrenwithhearinglossexperiencemultiplecaregivingchallenges.Grandparentshave
difficultylearningsignlanguageinadditiontotryingtolearnEnglishasasecondlanguage.These
challengesareexacerbatedwhengrandchildrendonotspeakorusetheirnativelanguage.Alossof
dexterityandvisioncreatesdifficultiesforgrandparentsattemptingtolearnhowtousesmallauditory
devicesfortheirgrandchildrensuchashearingaidsorcochlearimplants.Grandparentsalsohave
difficultyadjustingwhennewhearingtechnologiesaredeveloped.
Furtherevidencesuggeststhatwhilegrandparentsoftenprovidecareforgrandchildrenduringtheday,
parentsareoftentheonestoaccompanytheirchildrentothehearingclinic,andtheydonotalways
effectivelycommunicatecaregivinginstructionstograndparentcaregivers.Grandparentsalsoreportnot
feelingrespectedbytheirchildrenbecauseofdifferentparentingstyles.
SupportingGrandmothersasCaregivers:WhatModelsareWorking?
TheFirstStepsprojectmanagedbyDIVERSEcityCommunityResourcesSocietyinpartnershipwith
Options:ServicestoCommunitiesSocietyprovidesnewlyarrivedrefugeechildrenunderfiveandtheir
caregiverswitharangeofprogrammingtosupportearlychildhooddevelopment.Theprojectaimsto
equipcaregiverswith,“informationonparentingintheCanadiancontext.”49
ASouthAsianTaskGroupbeganperformingoutreachandawareness‐raisingstrategiesforSouthAsian
parentswithyoungchildrenbutdiscoveredthatgrandparentsareactuallyprovidingmuchofthecarefor
grandchildren.50Atthisrealizationthetaskforceshiftedtheiroutreachstrategiestoincludeliveradio
andtelevisionshowsasameansoftargetinggrandparentcaregivers.50Additionally,withfundingfrom
theUnitedWayoftheLowerMainland,DIVERSEcityproducedacalendarinPunjabiwithcaregivingtips
targetedatgrandparents.
DevelopingaResearchFramework:
ResearchObjectives:
Todeterminethosefactorsthatsupportthephysical,emotionalandspiritualhealthandwell
beingofSouthAsianandChineseimmigrantgrandmothersascaregivers.
TofurtherinvestigatehowtheimmigrationprocessandCanadianimmigrationpoliciesaffectthe
healthandsocialstatusofgrandmothersascaregivers.

2525
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page25of41
ResearchQuestions:
Whatinfluencesqualityof
life(positiveandnegative)
forimmigrant
grandmothersas
caregivers?
Thisquestionencompasses,butisnot
limitedto,thefollowingconsiderations:
Grandmothersinruralareas;
Grandmotherstoteenagers;
Grandmotherstogrownchildren;
Grandmotherstochildrenwithhealth
issues;
Thefinancialandsocialdependencyof
immigrantgrandmothers.
Sub‐questions:
1. Howdodifferentsocialdeterminantsofhealthinfluencequalityoflifefor
immigrantgrandmothersascaregivers?
2. Inwhatwaysdoesimmigrantgrandmothers’financialandemotional
dependencyimpact/influencetheirhealth?
3. Howaretheseimpactssimilarordifferentfordiversegroupsof
grandmothers(agesandstages,location,etc.)?
Whoshouldbeinvolvedinthis
research?
Immigrantgrandmothercaregiversfrom
ChinaandIndia;
Settlement/socialserviceagenciesto
grandparentsandchildren;
Healthagencies;
Schools;
Researchers.
Whereshouldthisresearchtake
place?
RuralandurbanlocationsacrossBC;
Placesofworship;
Communitycentres,specificallyolder
adults’programs.

2626
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page26of41
PreliminaryDiscussionofResearchMethods:
Thegroupdiscusseddifferentpossibleresearchmethodsincludingfocusgroups(ofthreetofourpeople)
andone‐to‐oneinterviewstousewithinaParticipatoryActionResearch(PAR)methodologicalcontext.
Interviewsandfocusgroupsshouldbeconductedinparticipants’firstlanguage/languageofchoiceand
latertranslatedbytheinterviewer/groupfacilitator.Researchquestionsshouldberefinedin
consultationwitholderwomenandserviceproviders.

2727
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page27of41
CommunityResourcesforOlderImmigrantWomen’sMentalHealth
RoundtableParticipants:
39%
40%
7%
7%
7% 0%0%
ICARETeam&Partners
Research ers
GovernmentRepresentatives
Front‐lineHealthService
Providers
MulticulturalSettlement&
CommunityAgencyWorkers
OlderAdults
HealthAdministrators
Figure5:CommunityResourcesforOlderImmigrantWomen’sMentalHealthRoundtableParticipants
Thementalhealthneedsofoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomenhavereceivedlittleattentionwithin
healthresearch;however,awealthofempiricalevidencesuggeststhatthisgroupofwomenhave
significantneedsthatarenotbeingmetwithinthehealthcaresystem.Theseneedsaredeterminedby
manyfactorsthatresultfromtheintersectionofgender,age,ethnicity,visibleminoritystatusandthe
immigrationexperience.Inparticular,formanywomen,mentalhealthissuesemergeasaresultofthe
stressesassociatedwiththeimmigrationprocess.
RiskFactorsforPoorMentalHealth:
SocialIsolation/Exclusion
SocialisolationintheCanadiancontexthasemergedasakeyissueaffectingthementalhealthofolder
immigrantwomen.Socialisolationisexacerbatedby:(1)alackofknowledgeofcommunityresources,
and(2)difficultiesaccessingsocialactivitiesoutsidethehomeduetocost,transportation,inclement
weatherandhousehold/childcareresponsibilities.Withouttheestablishmentofnewandenhanced
culturallyappropriateandrelevantsocialnetworksinCanada,isolationanddepressionarelikelyto
continuetooccurforthispopulation.
Theexperienceofethnicandculturaldifferenceforminoritypopulationscreatesstigmawhenthe
differencesareaccentuated;consequently,olderadultsfeelpressuredtosuppresslanguageandother
identifyingaspectsoftheirculturalpractices.Thispracticeofsuppressionleadstounhappiness.In

2828
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page28of41
contrast,socialsupportwithinculturalgroupspromotesafeelingofcultural/ethnicidentitythat
supportsgoodmentalhealth.46
AnecdotalevidencesuggeststhatforolderSouthAsianwomen,therearenotenoughplacesto,‘sitand
talk’.Inaddition,manywomenliveinthebasementoftheirfamily’shouseandaresometimesexcluded
fromfamilyeventsandexcursions.
LossofSupportNetworks:
Thelossofbroad‐basedfamilyandfriendsupportnetworksintheircountryoforigincontributesto
depressionamongolderimmigrantwomen,especiallywhentheyarelargelyconfinedwithinthehome.46
Manywomenfeelthat,inCanada,they’reexpectedtotakecareofthemselves,eventhoughtheyoftendo
nothavetheresourcestodoso.Thelossof‘informal’sourcesofsocialsupportpost‐immigrationisa
stress‐inducingandisolatingfactorforolderimmigrantwomen.46
Abuse:
Conflictwithinfamiliesiscommon.Olderwomenaresusceptibletomanyformsofviolence,abuseand
neglect.Elderabuseisdefinedas:
…anyintentional,unintentionalornegligentactthatcausesharmorserious
riskofharmtoanolderperson.Abusiveactscanbephysical,sexual,
psychological,emotional,financialorinvolveneglectandabandonment.46
Withinthecontextoffamilysponsorship,abusemaysometimestakethemorenuancedformofsocial
exclusionfromfamilyactivities.Familyshameofthe‘inappropriate’dressoraccentofolderfemale
relativessometimesresultsinexclusionfromsocialgatherings.46Moreover,agapiscreatedifolder
womenbelieve,‘mychildrenwilllookafterme,’butchildrenexpectolderparentstotakecareofnotonly
themselves,buttheirgrandchildrenaswell.
Poverty:
ThecurrentconfigurationofthesponsorshipsystemplacesmanyolderSouthAsianandChinese
immigrantwomeninapositionofpoverty.Alackofeconomicstabilitycausesstress,andleadstomental
healthissuesforthesewomen.Aftertheinitialten‐yearsponsorshipdependencyperiodisover,many
womenexperienceadditionalpressurefromtheirfamiliestosignovertheirpensioncheques,andsome
arecoercedintodoingso.
BarrierstoMentalHealthServices:
Immigrantpopulationsareunderservedbythementalhealthsystem.Thisisprimarilyduetostructural
inequalitieswithinthedeliveryandorganizationofmentalhealthservicesthatlimit,prohibit,omitand
excludecertainpopulationsfromgainingaccess.Thereismoreoverafalseassumptionthatthenature
andtypeofservicesprovidedareaccessibletoall.
Infact,groupparticipantsexpressedthatmanycommunitymentalhealthservicesarenotculturally
appropriate,relevantorsignificantforolderSouthAsianandChineseimmigrantwomen.Forone,
culturalnotionsof‘counseling’and‘depression’arenewtomanyimmigrantpopulations.Insome
instancessharingsuchpersonalinformationwithstrangersisconsideredshamefulandunacceptable.

2929
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page29of41
Thestigmaassociatedwithbeingseenas‘crazy’mayfurthermorepreventolderwomenfromaccessing
theseservices.Althoughtoutedasananswertotheproblemofcross‐culturaldifference,theideaofpeer
counselingisunsafeformanyolderimmigrantwomenbecauseofthefearofaconfidentialitybreach
withinthecommunity.Thesamemightalsoapplyforethnically‐matchedmentalhealthprofessionals.
Inadditiontoconsiderationsofculture,languagebarrierspreventaccesstocommunitymentalhealth
services.ManyolderwomenwithoutEnglishlanguageskillsaredependentonfamilymembersfor
assistancewithserviceaccess,andtheymightnotfeelcomfortableapproachingfamilymemberstohelp
themaccessmentalhealthservices,especiallyiffamilymembersareimplicatedinabuse.Manywomen
arealsoreliantonfamilymembersfortransportationtoandfromcommunitygroupmeetings.Iffamily
membersarebusy,manyolderwomenareunabletogoontheirown.
Furtherempiricalevidencesuggeststhatalackofawarenessofexistingcommunitymentalhealth
servicescontinuestobeacriticalbarriertoserviceaccessforthispopulationofolderwomen.Inpartthis
isduetothelackofsimilarprogramsinwomen’shomecountriesandunfamiliaritywiththeconceptsof
advocacyanddemandforoutreachservices.
SupportingPositiveMentalHealth:WhatModelsareWorkingintheCommunity?
SupportforCommunity‐BasedOutreachServices:
Outreachsupportgroupslocatedinthecommunityhelpkeepwomenconnectedtooneanotherand
preventsocialisolationanddepression.FormanyolderSouthAsianandChineseimmigrantwomen,
communitysupportgroupsmaybetheironlyopportunitytocomeoutofthehouseandsocializewith
peers.Supportgroupsinthecommunityallowolderadultstheopportunitytoopenupaboutfeelingsof
shameandexperiencesofabuseandneglect.Doctorsspecializinginmentalhealthoftenrefer
ethnoculturalminorityolderadultstocommunitygroupsbecauseformalservicesmaynotbeavailable,
relevantorappropriate.
In2008DIVERSEcitystartedaSouthAsianolderadults’outreachsupportgroupinSurreywiththeaimof
raisingawarenessofcommunityresourcesandprovidingmentalhealthinformationwithinthe
community.Theprojectbeganbyreachingouttoimmigrantolderadultsinreligiousgatheringspaces
withtranslatedbrochures,andtalkingtoolderadultsone‐on‐oneinplacessuchasparksandcommunity
centres.Inthisway,thementalhealthneedsofthisparticularpopulationemerged,andwomen’sunique
needsbecameacentralfocus.80%oftheclientsarenowwomen,manyofwhomactivelyseekoutfurther
information,activitiesandresourcestopromotetheirmentalhealthandwellbeing.Thisproject
demonstratesthatlackofinformationandawarenessofavailableservicesaresignificantbarriersand
canbeovercomewiththerightprogrammingandoutreachstrategies.
Settlementagencieslocatedinthecommunityprovideaplacefornewimmigrantstofeelathome.For
example,themulti‐serviceagencyS.U.C.C.E.S.S.helpstosociallyembedolderadultimmigrantswithinthe
greaterVancouverareabyinvolvingtheminprogramdesignandimplementation.Olderadultsin
multiplelocationsmeettogetinvolvedinthecommunity,discusstheirneeds,andplansocialactivities.
Communityempowermentisacentralgoalofgroupsthatareinitiallyrunthroughtheorganizationbut
ideallygrowtobeself‐directed.

3030
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page30of41
Thesuccessofcommunity‐basedoutreachprogramssuggeststhatwhencommunityorganizationsbegin
toadvocateforolderimmigrantwomen’smentalhealthneeds,womenthemselvesbegintoself‐advocate.
Ideas:What’sneeded?
Thegroupcreatedalistof“needs”forfuturecommunitymentalhealthservicedevelopmentthat
incorporatestheidentifiedneedsofolderSouthAsianandChineseimmigrantwomen.Theyinclude:
Theneedtogetolderwomentocomeoutoftheircomfortzonesandbecomemore
involvedintheircommunities.
Theneedtolobbyformoreoutreachresources.
Theneedforminoritygroupstoself‐advocatefortheircommunitymentalhealthneedsto
governmentandpolicymakers.
Theneedtooffertransportandonsitedaycareservicesforthosewomenwhohavetotake
careoftheirgrandchildren.
Theneedforappropriatelong‐termplanning
Theneedforculturally‐appropriateservices.
DevelopingaResearchFramework:
ResearchObjectives:
Toconductevaluativeresearchtosupportanddemonstratetheefficacyofexistingcommunity
mental‘wellness’programs.
Toshowcaseanddemonstratethevalueofsuccessfulcommunity‐basedoutreachservicestokey
decision‐makers.

3131
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page31of41
ResearchQuestion: 
Whatarethepromisingpracticeswithincommunitymentalhealthserviceprovision
thatcouldsupportpositivementalhealthoutcomesforolderSouthAsianand
Chinesewomen?
Sub‐Questions:
Whataretheexperiencesofpeoplewhoneedtogethelp?
Whataretheneedsoftheisolated/hiddenpeople?
Whatdoessuccesslooklike?
Howdoweknowthatprogramsareprovidingwhat’sneeded?
PreliminaryDiscussionofResearchMethods:
ParticipatoryActionResearch(PAR)isapreferredmethodologicalframeworkforthisgroup.Ethical
considerationsofinformedconsent,whatmeaningfulparticipationlookslikecross‐culturally,and
avoidingtheuseofacademicjargonthatmightstigmatizeparticipantswerediscussedwithinsucha
framework.

3232
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page32of41
NextSteps
TheICAREforumwasthefirststeptowardsdevelopingthreeresearchgrantproposalsformajorfunders.
Operationalresearchquestionsdevelopedwithintheroundtablesessionswillbediscussedandfurther
refinedthroughconversationswitholderChineseandSouthAsianimmigrantwomenaswellaswith
thosethatprovideandregulatetheircare.Threeworkinggroupswillmeetregularlybeginningin
October2009toworktowardsthedevelopmentandsubmissionofthreeseparateresearchfunding
proposalsin2010.Westronglybelievethattheinvolvementofpertinentstakeholdersatthisearlystage
ofresearchplanninganddevelopmentwillimproveboththerelevanceoftheresearchandthelikelihood
ofuptakeofrecommendationsintopolicyandpractice.

3333
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page33of41
ReferencesCited
1.KelchnerES.Physician/elderCommunicationVoicesNotHeard.[Ph.D.Dissertation].Universityof
Denver;2002.
2.StatisticsCanada.2006CensusofCanada.StatisticsCanadacatalogueno.97‐562‐XCB2006016.
Ottawa:2006.
3.SettlementandMulticulturalismDivision(MinistryofAttorneyGeneralandMinisterResponsiblefor
Multiculturalism).Immigrantsettlementconsultation:Developingprograminterventionsforimmigrant
seniors.2008.
4.GeeEM,KobayashiKM,PrusSG.Examiningthehealthyimmigranteffectinmid‐tolaterlife:Findings
fromtheCanadianCommunityHealthSurvey.CanadianJournalonAgingSupplement.2004;23:S61‐S69.
5.NewboldB.HealthstatusandhealthcareofimmigrantsinCanada:Alongitudinalanalysis.JHealth
ServResPolicy.2005;10:77‐83.
6.StatisticsCanada.LongitudinalsurveyofimmigrantstoCanada:Aportraitofearlysettlement
experiences.Ottawa:MinisterofIndustry;2005;89‐614‐XIE.
7.NewboldKB.Self‐ratedhealthwithintheCanadianimmigrantpopulation:Riskandthehealthy
immigranteffect.SocSciMed.2005;60:1359‐1370.
8.BCStats.Specialfeature:FamilyimmigrantstoBritishColumbia.Victoria,B.C.:GovernmentofBritish
Columbia;2006;05‐4.Availablefrom:www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/pubs/immig/imm054sf.pdf.Accessed
07/31/06.
9.HankivskyO,CormierR,DeMerichD,ChouJ.Intersectionality:Movingwomen’shealthresearch&
policyforward.Vancouver:Women’sHealthResearchNetwork;2009.
10.BenoitC,ShumkaL.Genderingthehealthdeterminantsframework:Whygirls’andWomen’shealth
matters.Vancouver:Women’sHealthResearchNetwork;2009.
11.CommissiononSocialDeterminantsofHealth(CSDH).Closingthegapinageneration:Healthequity
throughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealth.FinalreportoftheCommissiononSocial
DeterminantsofHealth.Geneva:WorldHealthOrganization;2008Accessed2/09/08.
12.RaskinA,Chiang‐PiaoChienA,Keh‐MingLin.ElderlyChinese‐andCaucasianAmericanscomparedon
measuresofpsychicdistress,somaticcomplaintsandsocialcompetence.IntJGeriatrPsychiatry.
1992;7:191‐198.
13.KoehnS.NegotiatingNewLivesandNewLands:ElderlyPunjabiWomeninBritishColumbia.[M.A.
Thesis]UniversityofVictoria,Victoria,B.C;1993.
14.HealthCanada,KinnonD.Canadianresearchonimmigrationandhealth:Anoverview.Ministerof
PublicWorksandGovernmentServicesCanada;1999;CatalogueNo.H21‐149/1999E.

3434
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page34of41
15.WilliamsR,HuntK.PsychologicaldistressamongBritishSouthAsians:Thecontributionofstressful
situationsandsubculturaldifferencesinthewestofScotlandtwenty‐07study.PsycholMed.
1997;27:1173‐1181.
16.KoehnS,SpencerC,HwangE.Promises,promises:Culturalandlegaldimensionsofsponsorshipfor
immigrantseniors.In:DurstD,MacLeanM,eds.DiversityandAgingamongImmigrantSeniorsinCanada:
ChangingFacesandGreyingTemples.Montreal:McGillUniversityPress;[acceptedbyeditors].
17.ChoudhryUK.UprootingandresettlementexperiencesofSouthAsianimmigrantwomen.WestJNurs
Res.2001;23:376‐393.
18.ChoudhryUK,JanduS,MahalJ,SinghR,Sohi‐PablaH,MuttaB.Healthpromotionandparticipatory
actionresearchwithSouthAsianwomen.JNursScholarsh.2002;34:75‐81.
19.GrewalS,BottorffJL,HiltonBA.TheinfluenceoffamilyonimmigrantSouthAsianwomen'shealth.J
FamNurs.2005;11:242‐263.
20.BoydM.ImmigrationandincomesecuritypoliciesinCanada:Implicationsforelderlyimmigrant
women.PopulationResearchandPolicyReview.1989;8:5‐24.
21.AhmadWIU,WalkerR.Asianolderpeople:Housing,healthandaccesstoservices.Ageing&Society.
1997;17:141‐165.
22.PublicHealthAgencyofCanada,CornwellL,HendricksonT,etal.Healthstatusandhealthneedsof
olderimmigrantwomen:Individual,community,societalandpolicylinks.Ottawa:PublicHealthAgency
ofCanada;2007.
23.SadavoyJ,MeierR,OngAY.Barrierstoaccesstomentalhealthservicesforethnicseniors:The
Torontostudy.CanJPsychiatry.2004;49:192‐199.
24.BrotmanS.Theprimacyoffamilyineldercarediscourse:Homecareservicestoolderethnicwomen
inCanada.JournalofGerontologicalSocialWork.2002;38:19–51.
25.CanadianAssociationofCommunityCareandCanadianEthnoculturalCouncil.Afeasibilitystudyon
multiculturalcommunitycare:Identifyingbarriersandfindingsolutions.Canada:CanadianAssociationof
CommunityCareandCanadianEthnoculturalCouncil;1998.
26.KatbamnaS,AhmadW,BhaktaP,BakerR,ParkerG.Dotheylookaftertheirown?informalsupport
forsouthasiancarers.HealthSocCareCommunity.2004;12:398‐406.
27.KoehnS.Negotiatingcandidacy:Accesstocareforethnicminorityseniors.Ageing&Society.
2009;29:585‐608.
28.Dixon‐WoodsM,CaversD,AgarwalMS,etal.Conductingacriticalinterpretivesynthesisofthe
literatureonaccesstohealthcarebyvulnerablegroups.BMCMedicalResearchMethodology[serial
online].2006;6:07/27/06.Availablefrom:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471‐2288/6/35.Accessed
07/27/06.

3535
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page35of41
29.Dixon‐WoodsM,KirkMD,AgarwalMS,etal.Vulnerablegroupsandaccesstohealthcare:Acritical
interpretivereview.NationalCo‐ordinatingCentreforNHSServiceDeliveryandOrganisationR&D
(NCCSDO);2005.
30.JohnsonG.ElderlyimmigrantwomenatriskwithoutEnglish.GeorgiaStraight.July9,20092009:26.
31.UniversityofVictoria,CentreonAging‐Ladner.ChronicDiseaseSelf‐ManagementPrograminBritish
Columbia.Availableat:http://www.coag.uvic.ca/cdsmp/information_cdsmp_program.htm.Accessed
09/15,2009.
32.BarnettR.Aframeworkforwomen‐centredhealth.Vancouver:Vancouver/RichmondHealthBoard;
2000.
33.GuptaM,SinghN,VermaS.SouthAsiansandcardiovascularrisk:Whatcliniciansshouldknow.
Circulation.2006;113:e924.
34.FikreeFF,PashaO.Roleofgenderinhealthdisparity:TheSouthAsiancontext.BrMedJ.
2004;328:823‐826.
35.SrinathReddyK,ShahB,VargheseC,RamadossA.Respondingtothethreatofchronicdiseasesin
India.TheLancet.2005;366:1744‐1749.
36.RaymondNT,VaradhanL,ReynoldDR,etal.Higherprevalenceofretinopathyindiabeticpatientsof
SouthAsianethnicitycomparedwithwhiteEuropeansinthecommunity.DiabetesCare.2009;32:410.
37.GrewalS,BottorffJL,BalneavesLG.APAPtestscreeningclinicinaSouthAsiancommunityof
Vancouver,BritishColumbia:Challengestomaintainingutilization.PublicHealthNurs.2004;21:412‐418.
38.HiltonBA,BottorffJL,JohnsonJL,etal.Thedesiways:TraditionalhealthpracticesofSouthAsian
womeninCanada.HealthCareWomenInt.2001;22:553‐567.
39.BottorffJL,BalneavesLG,SentL,GrewalS,BrowneAJ.Cervicalcancerscreeninginethnocultural
groups:Casestudiesinwomen‐centeredcare.WomenHealth.2001;33:33‐52.
40.JonesCA,DavachiS,NanjiA,etal.Indo‐centralAsiancardiovascularhealthandmanagementprogram
(ICA‐CHAMP).CanJCardiol.;24SupplSE430abstract#0510.Availablefrom:
http:www.pulsus.com/ccc2008/abs/430.htm.
41.JonesC.Personalcorrespondence.Follow‐upquestionfromICARE(immigrantolderwomen‐care
accessibilityresearchempowerment)forum.2009.
42.CitizenshipandImmigrationCanada.AnnualreporttoParliamentonImmigration.2006Accessed
30thNovember2007.
43.CitizenshipandImmigrationCanada(CIC).Canada–PermanentResidentsbyAgeandSourceArea.
44.MulticulturalismandImmigrationBranch,GovernmentofBritishColumbia.Immigrantseniorsto
BritishColumbia:2002‐2006.2007Accessed30/1/2008.
45.GovernmentofCanada.Statementsbymembers:PennyPriddy(SurreyNorth,NDP).39thparliament,
1stsession:EditedHansard.2006;036:1400.

3636
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page36of41
46.GurugeS,KanthasamyP,SantosJE.Addressingolderwomen'shealth.In:GurugeS,CollinsE,eds.
WorkingwithImmigrantWomen.Toronto:CentreforAddictionandMentalHealth;2008:235‐256.
47.SimmonsN.Barriers,bridgesandbeyond:Understandingperspectivesinlinguisticallyandculturally
diverseclinicalinteractions.[Ph.D.Dissertation].Canada:TheUniversityofBritishColumbia(Canada);
2007.
48.MukoyamaKJ,TakahashiM.OlderKoreanimmigrantsandgrand‐generativity.HallymInternational
JournalofAging.2005;7:115‐130.
49.DIVERSEcityCommunityResourcesSociety.FirstStepsCentre.Availableat:
http://www.dcrs.ca/index.php?page=firststeps274&section=services&cat=outreach&sub=2.Accessed
09/22,2009.
50.Gill‐BadeshaD.ICAREforumgrandparentsascaregiversroundtable.2009.

3737
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page37of41
Appendices
AppendixA:AFrameworkforWomenCentredHealth32

3838
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page38of41
AppendixB:ForumProgram
Thursday,June25,2009,10:00to16:00
LangaraCollege,Vancouver
ICARE(ImmigrantOlderWomen–CareAccessibilityResearchEmpowerment)forum:Knowledge.
Power.Access.
Welcome:
WearepleasedtowelcomeyoutotheICAREforum:Knowledge.Power.Access.
Webelievethatinordertoproduceresearchthatwillhaveapositiveinfluenceonaccesstohealthcare
byoldervisibleminorityimmigrantwomen,weneedtobuildonthecollectiveknowledgeofadiverse
andcaringgroupofstakeholders.
Webeginwiththerecognitionthatformanyolderimmigrantwomen,gender‐basedexperiencesof
inequitythroughouttheirlivescancombinewiththeirexperiencesasolderimmigrants,creatingbarriers
tocare.Workingwithyou,wehopetoidentifywaysinwhichresearchmayhelptofacilitategreater
powerandequityinhealthcareaccessforthisgrowingsubpopulationofolderadultsinBritish
Columbia.
Thankyouforjoiningusforthefirststageofthisimportantcollaborativejourney.
ForumObjectives:
Toclarifyhowgender,ageandimmigrationcaninteracttocreatebarrierstohealthcareaccessforolder
visibleminorityimmigrantwomen.
Toidentifyanddevelopresearchquestionsineachofthethreeprioritizedtopicareas.
Tocollectivelyidentifyandprioritizenextstepsforaction.
Tocreateopportunitiesforparticipantstostayinvolvedwiththeproject.
Program
09:30Welcome&Checkin–moderatorfortheday:ColleenReid
10:00  LayingtheFoundation–speakers:KarenKobayashi,MohinderSidhu,MaggieIp
10:45  IntersectionalityExercise
11:15  QuestionPeriod/Transition
11:30  ConcurrentRoundtables|Brainstorming
I:GrandparentsasCaregivers–facilitator:ColleenReid;panelists:DaljitBadesha,Noreen
Simmons,SharonKoehn
II:ImmigrantWomenCentredChronicDiseaseCareModel–facilitator:Karen
Kobayashi;panelists:JoanBottorff,SukiGrewal,

3939
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page39of41
III:CommunityResourcesforMentalHealth–facilitator:ElanaBrief;panelists:
SatwinderBains,EricLau,SaleemSpindari,LokayataKular
12:30  Lunch
13:15ConcurrentRoundtables|Priorities,Purpose,Problem
14:15Break&Exercise|“TheGrammaroftheResearchQuestion”
14:30  ConcurrentRoundtables|GettingtotheQuestion
15:30  TheGalleryWalk&Wrapup
Acknowledgements
Thisforumwouldnothavebeenpossiblewithoutthegenerousfundingandsupportinkindfromour
sponsors:
ThanksarealsoduetoLasChicasforprovidingadeliciouslunchforourparticipants.
ICARETeam
PrincipalInvestigators:KarenKobayashiPhD|SharonKoehnPhD
ResearchAssistant: MelanieSpenceHon.BA
ICARETeamMembers:RevaAdlerMD,MPH,FRCPC|SatwinderBainsMEd,PhD(C)|JoanBottorff
PhD,RN,FCAHS|DaljitGill‐BadeshaMA|SukhdevGrewalRN,MSN|
LokayataKular|JanetKushner‐KowBSc,MD,MEd,FRCPC|EricLau|
NoreenSimmonsPhD,SLP|SalemSpindariBA
ICARETeamPartners/Forumplanning:
ElanaBriefPhD(WHRN)|AndreaCosentino(BCNAR)|AmyJohal(BCNAR)|Colen
ReidPhD(WHRN)

4040
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page40of41
AppendixC:PresenterBiographies
SatwinderBains,MEd,PhD(candidate,SimonFraserUniversity)istheDirectoroftheCentreforIndo
CanadianStudiesattheUniversityoftheFraserValley.HerresearchinterestsincludetheIndoCanadian
Diaspora'scultural,socialandhistoricalsettlementandadaptationasitaffectstheirwell‐being.
Satwinderisalsoinvolvedincommunitydevelopmentbybuildingleadershipcapacitywithincultural
minoritycommunities.
JoanBottorff,PhD,RN,FCAHSisaProfessorandDirectoroftheInstituteforHealthyLivingandChronic
DiseasePreventionattheUniversityofBritishColumbiaOkanagan,Kelowna.Herresearchinterests
includehealthpromotionandhealthbehaviourchangewithafocusongenderandcancercontrol.
HerresearchhasincludedstudiesintheSouthAsiancommunityfocusingonwomenandmen’s
health–theseprojectshavebeenconductedincollaborationwithMs.SukiGrewal.
ElanaBrief,PhDisaResearchDirectorfortheWomen'sHealthResearchNetworkwheresheinspiresBC
healthresearcherstoaskhowsexandgendermayinfluencetheconditionstheystudy.SheholdsaPhD
inPhysicsfromtheUniversityofBritishColumbiawhereshedevelopedmethodsforusingMRI(Magnetic
ResonanceImaging)tonon‐invasivelymeasureconcentrationsofchemicalsinthehumanbrain.Elana
currentlyservesasPresidentoftheSocietyforCanadianWomeninScienceandTechnology(SCWIST)to
encourageandpromotewomenandgirlstoengageinscience.
DaljitGillBadesha,MAisCo‐ManageroftheFamilyServicesDepartmentatDIVERSEcity,andoversees
theeducation,preventionandoutreachprogramsofthedepartment.ThroughherroleastheSouth
AsianECDTaskGroupCoordinatorfortheSurrey/WhiteRockareashehasworkedextensivelyinthe
SouthAsiancommunitytoraiseawarenessonparentingintheearlyyears.Shehasworkedinthesocial
servicessectorfor14yearsasafamilysupportworker,educator,counsellor,groupfacilitatorand
manager.
SukhdevGrewal,RN,MSNisanursinginstructorwithLangaraCollege.Shehasextensiveexperience
workingwithmulticulturalpopulationsasacommunityhealthnurse.HerresearchfocusesonSouth
Asianwomen’shealthbeliefsandthefamily’sinfluenceonwomen’sdecisionmakingasitrelatesto
health.
MaggieIpcametoCanadain1966forherpostgraduatestudyattheUniversityofOttawaandreceived
herMEddegreein1967.UpongraduationsheworkedfortheDepartmentofNationalHealthand
WelfareinOttawabeforemovingtoBCin1970withherfamily.SheisthefoundingChairofS.U.C.C.E.S.S.
–anon‐profitorganizationservingnewimmigrantssince1974.MaggiewasaSecondarySchoolteacher
withtheRichmondSchoolBoarduntilherearlyretirementin2003.ShewaselectedtotheVancouver
CityCouncilfrom1993to1996.
KarenM.Kobayashi,PhDisanAssistantProfessorintheDepartmentofSociologyandaResearch
AffiliateattheCentreonAgingattheUniversityofVictoria.Sheisaco‐leaderfortheNationalInitiative
ontheCarefortheElderly’s(NICE)EthnicityandAgingteam.WithfundingfromtheCanadianInstitutes
ofHealthResearch(CIHR)andtheSocialSciencesandHumanitiesResearchCouncil(SSHRC),hercurrent
researchprogramsfocusontherelationshipbetweensocialisolationandhealthcareutilizationamong

4141
june2009forum
Knowledge.Power.Access.  Page41of41
olderadults,thenegotiationofsocialsupportandcareinethno‐culturalminorityandimmigrantfamilies,
andthe“healthyimmigranteffect”inmid‐tolaterlife.
SharonKoehn,PhDisamedicalanthropologistwhohasbeenconductingqualitativeaction‐oriented
researchwithethnoculturalminorityolderadultssince1990.Herresearchhasfocusedonconstructions
ofhealth,illnessandhealthcareprovisionandonorganizationalbarriersandsolutionstohealthcare
access,primarilywithPunjabieldersinBCandIndia.Shehasalsoconductedresearchwitholderadults
fromtheChinese,VietnameseandHispaniccommunitiesinGreaterVancouver.Asaresearchassociate
withtheCentreforHealthyAgingatProvidenceHealthCareshenowleads/participatesinseveral
interdisciplinaryprojectsfocusingondementia,healthandhealthcareaccess,andqualityoflifeof
ethnoculturalminorityolderadults.
LokayataKularwasbornandraisedinIndiaandmovedtoCanadain1998withherfamily.Sheworks
withtheSouthAsiancommunityasaFamilySupportWorkeratDIVERSEcity.HerroleasaMulticultural
OutreachWorkeristoreachouttofamilieswithchildrenfrom0‐6yearsandthe55pluspopulation–
raisingawarenessandconnectingthemwiththeappropriatecommunityresourcesandservices.
Lokayatahas20yearsofexperienceasaneducator,translator/interpreter,administratorandfamily
supportworker.
EricLauwasbornandraisedinHongKongbeforeimmigratingtoVancouverwithhisfamilyin1996.He
iscurrentlytheprogramcoordinatoroftheS.U.C.C.E.S.S.SeniorsQualityofLifeOutreachProject.The
projectoffersdrop‐insocialactivitiesforover200Chinese‐speakingimmigrantseniors,mostlywomen,
attheKillarney,Victoria‐FraserviewandMarpole‐OakridgeneighbourhoodsinVancouver.
ColleenReid,PhDisaResearchDirectorfortheWomen'sHealthResearchNetwork.In2002sheearned
aninterdisciplinaryPhDfromtheUniversityofBritishColumbia(UBC)intheareasofhealthpromotion
research,women'sstudiesandeducation.In2007shecompletedapostdoctoralfellowshipatSimon
FraserUniversity.Colleenhasdevotedherresearchcareertostudyingthesocialdeterminantsof
women'shealth,genderandhealth,andcommunity‐basedresearchmethodologies.
MohinderSidhu,MAcametoVancouverin1970whereshetaughtPunjabitochildrenattheKhalsa
DiwanSocietyfor20years,including12yearsasdirectoroftheprogram.Mohindercontinuestoserve
theIndoCanadiancommunitythroughherworkwithseniors’organizationsandadvocacyprograms.In
2006undertheauspicesofthe411SeniorsCentreSociety,Mohinderconductedaseriesofworkshops
forPunjabi‐speakingseniorsthatfocusedonseniors’rightsandaccesstogovernmentpensionsandother
services.
NoreenSimmons,PhD,SLPworksasaresearcherandSpeech‐LanguagePathologistattheBCFamily
HearingResourceCentre.Herpastandcurrentresearchinvestigatesculturalandlinguisticissuesthat
impactclinicalinteractionsforethnicallydiversefamilies.
SaleemSpindari,BAisthecoordinatoroftheCommunityOutreachProgramatMOSAIC.Hecoordinates
theAfghanWomen’sGroup,KurdishWomen’sGroup,theDropinCentreforTemporaryForeign
Workers,andMultilingolegal.ca.Saleemhaspreviouslyworkedasaninterpreter,settlementcounselor,
communitydevelopmentworkerandalegaladvocate.HeisalsoaboarddirectorwiththeVancouver
Cross‐CulturalSeniorsNetworkSociety.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Chapter
Full-text available
Reuniting immigrant families has been considered an important goal in Canadian policy (Citizen and Immigration Canada (CIC), 2006). When an elderly relative is sponsored under the Family Class immigration category, the sponsor makes an unconditional undertaking of support for a period of ten years to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. This is a longer period than for any other Family Class group. In addition to their legal status as dependents, sponsored seniors–the majority from India and China–are left financially and socially vulnerable by a constellation of cultural, situational and structural factors. Based on case studies of the South Asian and Chinese immigrant populations by authors, Koehn and Hwang, and the legal expertise of author Spencer, we conclude that Canada’s laws and policies have an important effect on intergenerational tension, the senior’s status, social isolation, as well as the risk of abuse and neglect or domestic and workplace exploitation. These factors can influence access to essential services such as housing and health care services. While further evidence is needed, findings from preliminary studies indicate the need for policy-level revisions as well as other approaches to reducing the vulnerability of this significant subpopulation of ethnic minority seniors.
Article
Full-text available
The ‘Barriers to Access to Care for Ethnic Minority Seniors’ (BACEMS) study in Vancouver, British Columbia, found that immigrant families torn between changing values and the economic realities that accompany immigration cannot always provide optimal care for their elders. Ethnic minority seniors further identified language barriers, immigration status, and limited awareness of the roles of the health authority and of specific service providers as barriers to health care. The configuration and delivery of health services, and health-care providers' limited knowledge of the seniors' needs and confounded these problems. To explore the barriers to access, the BACEMS study relied primarily on focus group data collected from ethnic minority seniors and their families and from health and multicultural service providers. The applicability of the recently developed model of ‘candidacy’, which emphasises the dynamic, multi-dimensional and contingent character of health-care access to ethnic minority seniors, was assessed. The candidacy framework increased sensitivity to ethnic minority seniors' issues and enabled organisation of the data into manageable conceptual units, which facilitated translation into recommendations for action, and revealed gaps that pose questions for future research. It has the potential to make Canadian research on the topic more co-ordinated. Also available at http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/articlerender.cgi?accid=PMC3693980 (open access)
Thesis
Full-text available
The objectives of this thesis are twofold: first, it aims to elucidate the experience of immigrant Punjabi women sponsored in their later years by sons and daughters already living in British Columbia, Canada; second, it examines the impact of immigration legislation on that experience. Family Class immigration legislation provides for the sponsorship of elderly parents on the condition that the sponsors support them for up to ten years. This stipulation, which enforces financial dependency, is examined in light of Indian cultural norms pertaining to filial duty towards aging parents and the changes that occur within the Punjabi family in the Canadian context. The sample of sixty-two is stratified among five subsets comprised of (1) twelve elderly Punjabi Sikh women, (2) fourteen elderly Punjabi Sikh men, (3) twelve younger Punjabi Sikh women, (4) eight South Asian community leaders, and (5) sixteen South Asian service providers. All participants are currently residents of the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, Canada. Data were collected by myself in the form of open-ended interviews. The information collected covers a broad range of topics so as to reflect the entirety of the elderly woman's experience in her new home. The application of Nancy Foner's interpretation of the Age Stratification Model, as set out in her ethnological work, Ages in Conflict: A Cross-Cultural Perspective of Inequality Between Old and Young (1984), facilitates the extraction of some prevailing trends from within this rather complex mosaic. Nonetheless, Foner does not lose sight of the multifactoral nature of relationships between individuals of different age strata. While the health and social services available to elderly Punjabi women in Canada far exceed those they might expect in India, many suffer considerable social losses once they join their children in this country. This is especially evident in the relationship between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law. Oftentimes, the daughter-in-law who sponsors and houses her husband's mother assumes the upper hand. In India, it is usually the young bride who occupies the most subservient position in her husband's home. In their efforts to secure some degree of respect in the sponsor's home, many elderly parents go out to work as farm labourers. Consistent with cultural mores which mandate that parents support, rather than extract from a daughter, elderly couples sponsored by daughters often feel they should establish some degree of independence as soon as they are able. Immigration legislation stipulating long-term dependency of the elderly couple on their sponsors further shapes their experience in this country, and may ultimately contribute to the incidence of elder abuse in this population. The term abuse is used here in its broadest sense to indicate not only physical manipulation, but also more insidious expressions such as neglect, forced confinement, or financial manipulation, for example. Several policy recommendations emerge from the study, not least of which is the suggestion that the dependency period be reduced to a maximum of five years or less. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, Department of Anthropology. Thesis (M.A.)--University of Victoria, 1993. Includes bibliographical references. Microfiche.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to compare prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy among U.K. residents of South Asian or white European ethnicity. This was a community-based cross-sectional study involving 10 general practices; 1,035 patients with type 2 diabetes were studied: 421 of South Asian and 614 of white European ethnicity. Diabetic retinopathy, sight-threatening retinopathy, maculopathy, and previous laser photocoagulation therapy were assessed after grading of retinal photographs. Data were collected on risk factors including age, duration, and treatment of diabetes, blood pressures, serum total cholesterol, and A1C. Patients of South Asian ethnicity had significantly higher systolic (144 vs. 137 mmHg, P < 0.0001) and diastolic (84 vs. 74 mmHg, P < 0.0001) blood pressure, A1C (7.9 vs. 7.5%, P < 0.0001), and total cholesterol (4.5 vs. 4.2 mmol/l, P < 0.0001). Diabetic retinopathy was detected in 414 (40%) patients (189 South Asian [45%] versus 225 white European [37%]; P = 0.0078). Sight-threatening retinopathy was detected in 142 (14%) patients (68 South Asian [16%] versus 74 white European [12%]; P = 0.0597). After adjustment for confounders, there were significantly elevated risks of any retinopathy and maculopathy for South Asian versus white European patients. Patients of South Asian ethnicity had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy, with significantly elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure, A1C, and total cholesterol; lower attained age; and younger age at diagnosis. Earlier onset of disease and higher levels of modifiable risk factors make early detection of diabetes, annual referral for retinal screening, and intensive risk factor control key elements in addressing this health inequality.
Article
This study examined the relationship between the three key elements of grand-generativity (Erikson, Erikson, & Kivnick, 1986) and several socio-cultural factors. Grand-generativity is a reworking of middle adulthood generativity under new conditions in old age and its primary concerns are reciprocity of caring, grandparenthood, and legacy through personal example. The expression of grand-generativity may be affected by the experience of immigration which presents the older adult with the dual challenge of acculturation and environmental disruption. Sixty-nine Korean immigrant participants were recruited from three ethnically diverse government subsidized senior housing apartments in Chicago. The sample consisted of three cohort groups: 22 young-old (mean age = 71.5 years); 35 old-old (mean age = 79.8 years); and 12 oldest-old (mean age = 88.0 years). The overall results revealed that the expression of grand-generativity is relatively stable across the age cohort groups and that grand-generativity was significantly associated with the level of acculturation, household occupation, and especially family relationship. These findings and their implications are discussed in the context of Confucianism, a dominant ideology in Korea, with its teaching of filial piety.
Article
We report the findings of a survey of 104 Asian older people in Bradford. For a high proportion, their condition was characterised by poverty, limited entitlements, inadequate housing, low levels of knowledge of health and social services, and problems of access to welfare benefits, health and social care. The situation of women was of particular concern. The study also highlights the problems of divided families, caused by restrictive immigration rules, resulting in many elderly people having no family support in this country.
Article
Policy on care in the community was founded on the premise that the care of frail elderly people with disabilities would be a joint responsibility for health and social care professionals, and family carers, supported by people within their social networks. The policy assumes that such social networks are common features of all communities in contemporary Britain, containing a reserve of people who can be called upon to provide support to carers. The present paper draws on material gathered for a qualitative study of the experiences carers in South Asian communities to examine the quality and quantity of informal support that was available in different types of households. Male and female carers were selected from the Punjabi Sikh, Gujarati Hindu, and Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities. A total of 105 carers participated in the project. Participants were caring for people in all age groups with physical and/or mental distress, and in some cases, with multiple and complex impairments. The analysis of carers’ accounts suggested that, for a variety of reasons, the main carer, irrespective of gender, had limited support both in nuclear and extended households. In addition, societal attitudes towards disability and the fear of obligation prevented the seeking and accepting of help from wider social networks. The paper concludes that the evidence does not support the assumption about extended families, and their willingness and ability to support carers. Many issues highlighted in this paper have far-reaching implications for policy makers in many countries in the West where South Asian people have made their homes.
Article
Reflecting past and present immigration policies, nearly one in three of Canada's elderly are foreign born. Yet, under the regulations associated with income security programs targeted at the elderly, part of the foreign born population may be ineligible for benefits or may receive reduced benefits. Following a discussion of immigration and income security policies, the paper focuses on the economic status of elderly immigrant women living in CMAs and on the social policy issues which result.