Visible Choice Sets And Scope Sensitivity In Contingent Values

American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association), 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 01/2001;
Source: RePEc


Through a combination of experimental and field analysis, we demonstrate that varying the visible choice set (i.e., set of goods which, at any given point in a valuation exercise, the respondent perceives as being the full extent of purchase options which will be made available in the course of that exercise) strongly affects observed scope. These results challenge the conclusion that contingent values are plagued by embedding and ordering effects, suggesting that such effects can be eliminated when the respondent is completely informed about the entirety of valuation tasks prior to answering the first elicitation question.

Download full-text


Available from: Ian J. Bateman
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated the presence of order bias in contingent valuation studies. We compared the willingness to pay (WTP) for an improved drug for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with that for the standard drug and examined whether the order in which the drugs are presented influences the results obtained. A pretested questionnaire was administered to 114 university students. WTP was elicited using the payment card method. A split sample was used to test order bias. The average WTP per month was euro 57.34 for the standard drug and euro 81.95 for the new drug. The results show that WTP for a new drug varies according to the order in which the drugs are presented. Respondents stated a higher WTP for the new drug if the standard therapy was presented first. This may be due to order bias, evidence of which has also been found in other studies and which is considered to be a limitation of the method. Finally, the use of marginal WTP is suggested as a solution.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2005 · The European Journal of Health Economics
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper studies the willingness to pay (WTP) for forest property rights in Viet Nam. We do so by asking respondents to estimate the value of two different forest property rights regimes where only the level of property security differs and all other forest plot characteristics are constant. We use this information to identify the value of the property rights security. Our results reveal that a significant number of individuals are willing to pay for an additional area of forestland but that the amount offered appears to be inadequate to compensate sellers, as very few land market transactions actually take place. The results further indicate that income relates positively to WTP, irrespective of forest property regime. Wealth, age, and ethnicity also have an impact on the amount households are willing to pay. As expected, there was a significant mark-up on the more secure right. Econometric estimates of the difference between the WTP for secure and insecure property rights show that a higher level of female education, and household age decrease the difference between the two WTP measures while the difference tends to increase as income improves. This has important policy implications, as it indicates that households tend to evaluate the property rights institutions differently.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2008 · Environmental and Resource Economics