ArticlePDF Available

Erratum: “The Kirchhoff elastic rod, the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, and DNA supercoiling” [J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5186 (1994)]

AIP Publishing
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Authors:
Erratum: “The Kirchhoff elastic rod, the nonlinear Schrödinger equation,
and DNA supercoiling” [J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5186 (1994)]
Y. Shi, J. E. Hearst, T. C. Bishop, and H. R. Halvorson
Citation: J. Chem. Phys. 109, 2959 (1998); doi: 10.1063/1.476848
View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.476848
View Table of Contents: http://jcp.aip.org/resource/1/JCPSA6/v109/i7
Published by the AIP Publishing LLC.
Additional information on J. Chem. Phys.
Journal Homepage: http://jcp.aip.org/
Journal Information: http://jcp.aip.org/about/about_the_journal
Top downloads: http://jcp.aip.org/features/most_downloaded
Information for Authors: http://jcp.aip.org/authors
Downloaded 26 Sep 2013 to 221.130.23.19. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://jcp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
ERRATA
Erratum: ‘‘The Kirchhoff elastic rod, the nonlinear Schro
¨dinger equation,
and DNA supercoiling’’ J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5186 1994…‡
Y. Shi, J. E. Hearst,a) and T. C. Bishop
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460
H. R. Halvorson
Molecular Biology Research Program, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202
@S0021-9606~98!00331-6#
Errors have been detected in our paper,1none of which
affect the mathematical results or conclusions. We apologize
for any inconvenience caused. There are errors in Eqs. ~3.9b!
and ~4.24!. In addition, the original authors are grateful to H.
Halvorson for bringing to our attention an error in our nu-
merical implementation of Eq. ~5.14a!in generating Sec.
VD~Numerical examples!. The errors in no way affect the
mathematical validity of the derivations, although some nu-
merical results have changed significantly.
Below are the corrected Eqs. ~3.9b!and ~4.24!, as well
as a corrected Sec. V D. In the text of the latter, only the
values of nin paragraph ~5!just preceding Sec. VI ~Conclu-
sions!have changed. In the table and figures, all of the val-
ues have been affected. Our conclusions still stand. In par-
ticular, the errors have not undermined our conclusion that
Eq. ~3.10!describes the observed folding of DNA into 11 nm
and 30 nm fibers in vivo. Recent examples of the use of these
and more advanced equations in describing the 11 nm and
the 30 nm fibers are presented in Refs. 2, 3, and 4 at the end
of this Erratum. The conclusions and mathematical imple-
mentations in these references are not affected by the correc-
tions described here.
b5E1~
v
3
~0!!21~22l!
v
3
~0!~Q/l!1~12l!~Q/l!2,~3.9b!
T~
k
,
r
!51
N2
r
S
1
k
F
JQ1
S
E21
2Q2
D
k
221
2
k
4
G
,2Q
k
˙,
kk
˙
2P
k
˙,21
k
F
JP1
S
N21
2PQ
D
k
2
G
,
S
E21
2
k
2
D
P2NQ
N
r
k
˙,
S
J
k
2Q
k
2
D
N
r
,
S
1
2
k
22E
D
N
r
D
.~4.24!
TABLE I. Numerical values calculated follow the procedure outlined in Sec. V D.
m
˜
i
n
˜
i
i(
m
i)(
n
i)nDLk Tw/DLk Wr/DLk UTotal /UCircle UTwist /UTotal UBend /UTotal
1 0.499752 0.937809 226 225 0.220696 0.779304 1.051157 0.046262 0.953738
~0.412852!~0.937809!
2 0.562521 0.984847 227 225 0.109145 0.890855 1.121877 0.010601 0.989399
~0.464706!~0.956318!
3 0.577892 0.999228 228 225 0.025301 0.974699 1.202923 0.000531 0.999469
~0.477405!~0.961110!
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS VOLUME 109, NUMBER 7 15 AUGUST 1998
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
The Letters to the Editor section is divided into three categories entitled Notes, Comments, and Errata. Letters to the Editor are
limited to one and three-fourths journal pages as described in the Announcement in the 1 July 1998 issue.
29590021-9606/98/109(7)/2959/3/$15.00 © 1998 American Institute of Physics
Downloaded 26 Sep 2013 to 221.130.23.19. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://jcp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
V. TOROIDAL HELIX
D. Numerical examples
In this subsection we shall show briefly some numerical
examples of the toroidal helix. This numerical calculation
has been carried out using the software program
Mathematica5which has built in all the elliptic functions and
elliptic integrals.
~1!We choose l5C/A51, and we assume that the
DNA duplex helix contains 500 duplex turns for which the
total length Lis equal to 1768 nm ~50.34 nm/basepair
310.4 basepair/turn 3500 turn!and the radius of the DNA
duplex helix is 1 nm. We also assume that the linking num-
ber deficiency
s
5DLk/Lk0520.05. Thus DLk5500
3(20.05)5225.
~2!There are four possible sign combinations for
$
sign(J),sign(Q)
%
, namely, ~6,6!and ~6,7!. For
each combination of
$
sign(J),sign(Q)
%
, since
u
n
u
.0,
we find numerically from ~5.14a!that sign(l) is determined.
For simplicity we consider here only the first two cases;
i.e.,
~a!sign(J)5sign(Q)5sign(l)51, which will result in
Wr.0, DTw.0, and n.DLk5Wr1DTw.0;
~b!the mirror image of ~a!, i.e., sign(J)5sign(Q)
5sign(l)521, which will result in Wr,0, DTw,0, and
n,DLk5Wr1DTw,0; Because we have already set
DLk5225, only Case ~b!needs to be considered.
~3!For Case ~b!we find out in the
m
˜
2
n
˜
plane that curve
DLk5225 intersects with curves n5226,227,228,...,at
points
$
m
˜
i,
n
˜
i
%
, which are tabulated in Table I.
~4!We then calculate and tabulate in Table I the follow-
ing quantities for Case ~b!:UTotal /UCircle ,UTwist /UTotal ,
FIG. 1. xyplot ~top!and
r
zplot ~bottom!for Case ~b!with
DLk5225 and n5226. The units of
$
x,y,z,
r
%
are nanometers.
The formulas for
$
r
,
f
,z
%
~with x5
r
cos
f
,y5
r
sin
f
) are given
in ~4.19!, whereas the parameters in ~4.19!are given
by
m
50.4128522253359228563,
n
50.9378086691008355865,
w520.0526363802842685069, E50.0039768655823549271,
Q520.0196419884347520515, N50.0012196983004668965, and
P50.0196419884347520515.
FIG. 2. xyplot ~top!and
r
zplot ~bottom!for Case ~b!with
DLk5225 and n5227. The units of
$
x,y,z,
r
%
are nanometers.
The formulas for
$
r
,
f
,z
%
~with x5
r
cos
f
,y5
r
sin
f
) are given
in ~4.19!, whereas the parameters in ~4.19!are given
by
m
50.4647064549310418084,
n
50.9563175595835276121,
w520.0558460231662935138, E50.0044031225340830020,
Q520.0097138825351320032, N50.0016083689287922024, and
P50.0354819195407423767.
2960 J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 109, No. 7, 15 August 1998 Letters to the Editor
Downloaded 26 Sep 2013 to 221.130.23.19. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://jcp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
UBend /UTotal ,Tw/DLk,Wr/DLk. The energy UCircle is the
total elastic energy of the thin rod whose axis is a circle with
radius 2
p
/Land twist DTw5DLk5225. It is given ex-
plicitly by ~5.17!.
~5!We make three plots ~Figs. 1, 2, and 3!for n
5226, n5227, and n5228 to show the basic features of
the toroidal helices generated by the elliptic function solu-
tions.
We notice immediately, from Figs. 1–3, a distinctive
feature: the cross section of the torus on which the DNA is
wound is nearly, but not precisely, a circle.
a!Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
1Y. Shi and J. E. Hearst, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5186 ~1994!.
2Y. Shi, A. Borovik, and J. E. Hearst, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 3166 ~1995!.
3J. E. Hearst and Y. Shi, Nonlinear Sci. Today 5,1~1995!~http://
www.springer-ny.com/nst!.
4T. C. Bishop and J. E. Hearst, J. Phys. Chem. ~in press!.
5Mathematica is a trademark of Wolfram Research, Inc., 100 Trade Center
Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820-7237.
FIG. 3. xyplot ~top!and
r
zplot ~bottom!for Case ~b!with
DLk5225 and n5228. The units of
$
x,y,z,
r
%
are nanometers.
The formulas for
$
r
,
f
,z
%
~with x5
r
cos
f
,y5
r
sin
f
) are given
in ~4.19!, whereas the parameters in ~4.19!are given
by
m
50.4774045841894475342,
n
50.9611103691951271582,
w520.0582353482409647673, E50.0047692646660506139,
Q520.0022517708616683947, N50.0019246021965750458, and
P50.0496116251388530552.
2961J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 109, No. 7, 15 August 1998 Letters to the Editor
Downloaded 26 Sep 2013 to 221.130.23.19. This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://jcp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
... For this purpose a variety of experimental techniques (see [1]) as well as computational modeling [3, 4, 5, 6] have been used. In our model the hierarchy of folding: DNA, nucleosomes, condensed chromatin, corresponds to the hierarchy of equilibrium conformations that exist for an elastic rod [7, 8, 9]. In elastic rod theory these folded states are unstable, but biologically we know that the first folding (nucleosomes ) is stabilized by the histone octamer and the second folding (condensed chromatin) is stabilized by linker histone [10]. ...
... The barrier between these minima is relatively low thus well-defined regular structures do not exist. We assume that to a first approximation, i.e. we smooth out the energy landscape even further, the structures of extended and condensed chromatin are governed by the elastic properties of DNA and can be predicted based on the theory of elastic rods [7, 8, 9, 17, 18]. As noted by Bishop and Hearst [17], the " pear-shaped " or elliptic structures that are observed are a tell-tale sign that DNA is behaving as an elastic rod even when it is folded into nucleosomes and the energy landscape associated with a potential function describing chromatin folding is sufficiently flat to allow for the irregularities noted above. ...
Article
Full-text available
A theoretical framework for evaluating the approximate energy and dynamic properties associated with the folding of DNA into nucleosomes and chromatin is presented. For this purpose experimentally determined elastic constants of linear DNA and a simple fold geometry are assumed to derive constants for the higher order folding. The model predicts the correct order of magnitude for the experimentally determined Young's and shear modulus of condensed chromatin. Thus we have demonstrated that the elastic properties of DNA are the primary determinant of the elastic properties of each folded state. The derived elastic constants are then used to predict the speed of propagation of small amplitude waves. It is shown that extension/compression, twist, bend or shear waves can be excite in each folded state.
... are constants of integration. In this way, we recover the variational constraints in equation (36) that would have been produced by analysis of equation (23) from a Lagrangian perspective Langer and Singer, 1996;Shi et al., 1998). ...
Article
Consider a thin, flexible wire of fixed length that is held at each end by a robotic gripper. Any curve traced by this wire when in static equilibrium is a local solution to a geometric optimal control problem, with boundary conditions that vary with the position and orientation of each gripper. We prove that the set of all local solutions to this problem over all possible boundary conditions is a smooth manifold of finite dimension that can be parameterized by a single chart. We show that this chart makes it easy to implement a sampling-based algorithm for quasi-static manipulation planning. We characterize the performance of such an algorithm with experiments in simulation.
Chapter
The theory of an elastic rod whose centerline is inextensible and whose cross sections remain plane and normal to the centerline is discussed. This theory, which is known as Kirchhoff rod theory, is presented in the modern context of a Cosserat rod theory. The governing equations for this widely used theory result in a set of equations to determine a rotation tensor P and a position vector r. This theory has a celebrated history in part because of Kirchhoff’s discovery that the equations governing static deformations of the rod are analogous to those for the rotational motion of a rigid body. A range of applications of the theory is also presented in this chapter. These examples include a terminally loaded rod which is bent and twisted and an initially curved rod which is straightened.
Article
Full-text available
The extended Schrödinger equation for the Kirchhoff elastic rod with noncircular cross section is derived using the concept of complex rigidity. As a mathematical model of supercoiled DNA, the Schrödinger equation for the rod with circular cross section is a special case of the equation derived in this paper. In the twistless case of the rod when the principal axes of the cross section are coincident with the Frenet coordinates of the centreline, the Schrödinger equation is transformed to the Duffing equation. The equilibrium and stability of the twistless rod are discussed and a bifurcation phenomenon is presented.
Article
A theoretical framework for evaluating the approximate energy and dynamic properties associated with the folding of DNA into nucleosomes and chromatin is presented. Experimentally determined elastic constants of linear DNA and a simple fold geometry are assumed in order to derive elastic constants for extended and condensed chromatin. The model predicts the Young s modulus of extended and condensed chromatin to within an order of magnitude of experimentally determined values. Thus we demonstrate that the elastic properties of DNA are a primary determinant of the elastic properties of the higher order folded states. The derived elastic constants are used to predict the speed of propagation of small amplitude waves that excite an extension(sound), twist, bend or shear motion in each folded state. Taken together the results demonstrate that folding creates a hierarchy of time, length and energy scales.
Article
Full-text available
We have derived a generalized one-dimensional time-independent nonlinear Schrödinger equation for the stationary state configurations of supercoiled DNA, based on an elastic rod model which includes deformations of bending, twisting, shear, and extension. Closed-form solutions for the axis of DNA have been obtained in terms of elliptic functions and elliptic integrals. These solutions describe the stationary state configurations of supercoiled DNA. © 1995 American Institute of Physics.
Article
Full-text available
We have derived a time‐independent, one‐dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation for the stationary state configurations of supercoiled DNA. The effect of DNA self‐contact has been included analytically. For the cases of non‐self‐contact and periodic boundary conditions, closed‐form solutions have been obtained which describe the stationary state configurations of supercoiled DNA.
Article
The asymptotics ast + of shock waves of the modified Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers (MKdV-B) equation is investigated. An attractor interpretation of shock problems for integrable systems is presented and some problems of nonlinear stability are discussed. The MKdV-B equation is considered as a nonconservative perturbation of the integrable modified Korteweg-de Vries (MKdV) equation. The MKdV equation considered here has anon-self-adjoint Lax pair. In spite of this difficulty, acomplex Whitham deformation is constructed.
  • J E Hearst
  • Y Shi
J. E. Hearst and Y. Shi, Nonlinear Sci. Today 5, 1 ͑1995͒ ͑http:// www.springer-ny.com/nst͒.