Intracranial Hemorrhage and Liver-Associated Deaths Associated with Tipranavir/Ritonavir: Review of Cases from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System
Division of Antiviral Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, USA. AIDS patient care and STDs
(Impact Factor: 3.5).
12/2008; 22(11):843-50. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2008.0043
Tipranavir (TPV), a protease inhibitor, has box warnings for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure and death). A box warning is a labeling statement about serious adverse events leading to significant injury and/or death. A box warning is the most serious warning placed in the labeling of a prescription medication. As a result of the respective morbidity and mortality associated with ICH and hepatic failure, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) was searched for reports of these adverse events in HIV-infected patients receiving a tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen. This search comprised part of the FDA's safety analysis for traditional approval. From July 2006 to March 2007, 10 cases of ICH were identified in AERS. From June 2005 to March 2007, 12 cases of liver-associated deaths were identified. One patient experienced liver failure and fatal ICH. Most patients with these events had additional risk factors. Among patients with liver-associated deaths, 3 had HIV-RNA less than 400 copies per milliliter at the time of hepatic failure. Among 10 patients who discontinued TPV/r when hepatic failure developed, median number of days post-TPV/r to death was 23 (range, 2-69 days). Review of AERS did not identify new safety concerns regarding ICH. Among most patients with liver-associated deaths, death appears to occur soon after hepatic failure develops. If considering TPV/r, careful assessment of risk/benefit is suggested for patients at risk for ICH and hepatic failure.
Available from: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- "Excluding patients also treated with enfuvirtide reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to $46,147 per QALY . However, the use of tipranavir was limited by important tolerability and toxicity issues, including relatively uncommon but potentially fatal hepatotoxicity and intracranial hemorrhage . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In the early years of the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, HIV with resistance to two or more agents in different antiretroviral classes posed a significant clinical challenge. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV was an important cause of treatment failure, morbidity, and mortality. Treatment options at the time were limited; multiple drug regimens with or without enfuvirtide were used with some success but proved to be difficult to sustain for reasons of tolerability, toxicity, and cost. Starting in 2006, data began to emerge supporting the use of new drugs from the original antiretroviral classes (tipranavir, darunavir, and etravirine) and drugs from new classes (raltegravir and maraviroc) for the treatment of MDR HIV. Their availability has enabled patients with MDR HIV to achieve full and durable viral suppression with more compact and cost-effective regimens including at least two and often three fully active agents. The emergence of drug-resistant HIV is expected to continue to become less frequent in the future, driven by improvements in the convenience, tolerability, efficacy, and durability of first-line HAART regimens. To continue this trend, the optimal rollout of HAART in both rich and resource-limited settings will require careful planning and strategic use of antiretroviral drugs and monitoring technologies.
Available from: Clifford Leen
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Audit standards: 1. All new HIV-positive patients should be screened for HBV and HCV markers. 2. All HBV non-immune patients should be vaccinated. 3. All HIV-positive patients should have their HBV and HCV status measured before commencement of antiretroviral therapy. 4. All HBV-and HCV-infected patients should be vaccinated against hepatitis A if non-immune. 5. All HCV-positive patients non-immune to HBV should be vaccinated. 6. All HBV-and HCV-infected patients should have documented evidence in their case notes of a discussion on alcohol avoidance and how to reduce the risks of transmission. 7. Case notes of new HBV-positive patients should contain evidence of an attempt to contact household and sexual contacts and offer vaccination if non-immune. 8. Case notes of new HCV-positive patients should contain evidence of an attempt to notify parenteral and sexual contacts and offer them a test. 9. All patients who are HBsAg-positive or HCV-positive should have a clear antiviral treatment plan written in their notes at least once a year. 10. All HCV-RNA-positive patients should have an HCV viral load and genotype performed. 11. All HBV-positive patients should have their 'e' status checked, an HBV DNA viral load and an anti-HDV antibody test. 12. All patients with chronic HBV or HCV should be offered an assessment of liver fibrosis by either liver biopsy, hepatic elastography or other validated non-invasive fibrosis test unless they have a specified contra-indication. 13. All HBV-positive patients with an HBV DNA >2000IU/mL and evidence of liver damage should be offered treatment. 14. All HCV-RNA-positive patients should be offered treatment unless there is a specific contra-indication. 15. All patients with cirrhosis should be jointly treated by a hepatologist and have regular assessments for hepatocellular carcinoma according to risk.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Tipranavir (TPV) is a nonpeptidic protease inhibitor with potent in vitro activity against most HIV-1 strains resistant to other protease inhibitors. In vitro data have shown that resistance to TPV develops slowly. When coadministered with ritonavir (RTV) as a booster, TPV has shown potent antiviral activity in multiple antiretroviral-experienced patients. In the RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 studies, the efficacy and safety of TPV/RTV (500/200 mg twice daily) in highly treatment-experienced HIV-1-positive patients was assessed. Analysis at 48 weeks showed that TPV/RTV-containing regimens significantly improved immune and virological responses compared with a RTV-boosted comparator protease inhibitor plus optimized background regimen. TPV is generally well tolerated; nevertheless, clinical hepatitis and liver decompensation have been associated to its use, together with an indication of an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Extensive listing of drug-drug interactions have been reported with TPV.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.