Interprofessional Conflict and Medical Errors: Results of a National Multi-Specialty Survey of Hospital Residents in the US

ArticleinJournal of Interprofessional Care 22(6):573-86 · January 2009with63 Reads
DOI: 10.1080/13561820802364740 · Source: PubMed
Clear communication is considered the sine qua non of effective teamwork. Breakdowns in communication resulting from interprofessional conflict are believed to potentiate errors in the care of patients, although there is little supportive empirical evidence. In 1999, we surveyed a national, multi-specialty sample of 6,106 residents (64.2% response rate). Three questions inquired about "serious conflict" with another staff member. Residents were also asked whether they had made a "significant medical error" (SME) during their current year of training, and whether this resulted in an "adverse patient outcome" (APO). Just over 20% (n = 722) reported "serious conflict" with another staff member. Ten percent involved another resident, 8.3% supervisory faculty, and 8.9% nursing staff. Of the 2,813 residents reporting no conflict with other professional colleagues, 669, or 23.8%, recorded having made an SME, with 3.4% APOs. By contrast, the 523 residents who reported conflict with at least one other professional had 36.4% SMEs and 8.3% APOs. For the 187 reporting conflict with two or more other professionals, the SME rate was 51%, with 16% APOs. The empirical association between interprofessional conflict and medical errors is both alarming and intriguing, although the exact nature of this relationship cannot currently be determined from these data. Several theoretical constructs are advanced to assist our thinking about this complex issue.
    • "These teams have to carry out activities delegated to them by the mobile stateregistered nurses at times when the nurses are not in the residential care homes. But in some cases the organization of work in the homes is an obstacle to building these cooperative relationships between health professionals, and creates particular difficulties between the daytime and the night-time teams [15,16] . Cooperative relations which enable good interprofessional communication are essential for better night-time care of residents who have specific needs and require urgent treatment [17][18][19][20][21]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Background: A trial scheme to improving night-time nursing in residential care homes for dependent older people in the Ile de France region of France involved appointing degree-qualified nursing staff to circulate between three or four care homes. In most old age care homes, the absence of a qualified nurse to carry out health procedures during the night leads to night-duty care teams having to deal with urgent medical complications. This study aims to identify the factors which may impede the building of cooperative relationships between night staff and mobile nurses working in a number of medical settings.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2016
    • "We construct a model of team innovation in which the relationship between cognitive diversity and innovation is mediated by debate and moderated by trans-specialist knowledge (Figure 1). Our contribution in doing so is particularly important as, although aspects of mutual understanding have rarely been investigated in relation to diverse team performance, sharing knowledge across domains has been consistently linked to misinterpretation and conflict (see, e.g., Baldwin et al., 2008). This article is structured as follows: First, we describe the theoretical foundations underpinning the influence of cognitive diversity on team dynamics and innovation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Interprofessional health care teams are increasingly utilized in health care organizations. Although there is support for their capacity to solve complex problems, there is also evidence that such teams are not always successful. In an effort to understand the capacity of interprofessional teams to innovate successfully, we investigate the role of cognitive diversity to establish whether and how knowledge differences lead to innovation. The aim of this study was to construct and investigate a model of team innovation predicted by cognitive diversity. In addition to investigating the direct impact of cognitive diversity in interprofessional health care teams, we develop a model incorporating mediated and moderated effects. In this study, we explore the role of debate as a mediating factor capable of explaining the impact of cognitive diversity on innovation. We further propose that the link between cognitive diversity and innovation through debate is contingent upon trans-specialist knowledge, knowledge shared by health care professionals, spanning specialist divides and enabling mutual understanding. The hypotheses were investigated using a cross-sectional, correlational design. Survey data received from 75 interprofessional teams employed in an acute care setting, representing a 36% response rate, were used to investigate our model. Analysis supports a significant relationship between cognitive diversity and debate, which is stronger when teams rate highly for trans-specialist knowledge. Results also support a positive relationship between debate and innovation and our full moderated mediated pathway. A range of strategies are indicated by our results to increase innovation in interprofessional teams. In particular, interventions such as interprofessional education and training, which have been shown to facilitate the development of shared language and meaning, are recommended by our findings.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2016
    • "Job demands (physical or psychological efforts requiring to execute the job) are linked to work overload (Freeney & Tiernan, 2009), fatigue, psychosomatic symptoms and emotional exhaustion (Adriaenssens et al., 2011 ). Interpersonal problems (conflict with colleagues, supervisors and medical staff) increase work stress among nurses and may lead to compromised patient safety via medical errors and adverse patient outcomes (Baldwin & Daugherty, 2008 ). Furthermore, nurses with high levels of role overload, role conflict, and role ambiguity reported higher work stress and lower job satisfaction (Chen et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Work stress is intrinsic to nursing. It negatively affects nurses' health and well-being. Nurses, who are under stress, often report job dissatisfaction, intention to quit their job, burn out, and physical complaints. This study aimed to identify sources of work stressors among registered nurses and examine the interrelationships among stress, positive affectivity, and work engagement. A descriptive -correlational research design was conducted. A sample of 195 full-time nurses was recruited from a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Data were collected via self-reported questionnaires and then analyzed using descriptive statistics and path analyses. Work stressors experienced by most nurses were workload, time pressure, inadequate reward, inadequate patient interaction, and unmanageable emotional demands of job. Positive affectivity had a significant negative relationship with stress in the past month but had a significant positive relationship with three components of work engagement. Worksite interventions may be developed to help nurses manage stress. Particularly, workshops enhancing positive affectivity and work engagement could be offered in health care facilities.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2015
Show more