ArticlePDF Available

The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination in the Framework of Psychological Counseling and Guidance

Authors:

Abstract

It is important to understand causes and consequences of procrastination that appear common among general and academic populations. Procrastination affects people in various domains of life such as academic, professional, social relationships, and finance management. A person with high procrastination may lose his/her work, drop out from school, or may endanger his/her marital life. Similarly, high procrastinators might increasingly experience psychological distress related to lack of sense of personal control, self-worth and lack of sense of self-perceived personal ability as deadlines approach. The purpose of this study is to present theoretical and conceptual frames of procrastination that are important variables of individual difference and are common in general and academic populations.
The Evaluation of the Major
Characteristics and Aspects of the
Procrastination in the Framework
of Psychological Counseling and
Guidance.
Murat BALKIS, Erdinç DURU
Abstract
It is important to understand causes and consequences of procrastination that is ap-
peared common among general and academic population. Procrastination affects pe-
ople in various domains of life such as academic, professional, social relationships,
and finance management. A person with high procrastination may lose his/her work,
drop out from school, or may endanger his/her marital life. Similarly, High procrasti-
nators might increasingly experience psychological distress related to lack of sense
of personal control, self- worth and lack of sense of self-perceived personal ability as
deadlines approach. The purpose of this study presents theoretical and conceptual
frames of procrastination that is an important variable of individual difference and
common in general and academic population.
Key Words
Procrastination, Conceptual Framework, Psychological Counseling.
© 2007 E¤itim Dan›flmanl›¤› ve Araflt›rmalar› ‹letiflim Hizmetleri Tic. Ltd. fiti.
*Correspondence: Murat BALKIS, Ph.D., Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Department
of Educational Sciences, ‹ncilip›nar 20020 Denizli_ Turkey. E-Mail: mbalkis@pau.edu.tr
** Assit. Prof. Dr., Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Scien-
ces.
Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice
7(1) • January 2007 • 376-385
Procrastination is a phenomenon in which a person neglects to at-
tend to a necessary responsibility, such as a task or decision, in a ti-
mely fashion, often despite their good intentions or inevitable ne-
gative and unpleasant consequences. It is not unusual for people to
procrastinate occasionally, but for some, procrastination is a chronic
problem that causes considerable psychological discomfort and dis-
tress. Procrastination is especially common in the general and aca-
demic populations. Ellis and Knaus (1977) point out that 95% of
American college students procrastinate. In Solomon and Roth-
blum’s (1984) survey, 46% of students reported that they procrasti-
nate on academic tasks at least half of the time. Harriott and Ferra-
ri (1996) refer to procrastination as one of the least understood mi-
nor human miseries, affecting 15-25% of the population during the-
ir lifetime.
Procrastination is pervasive, affecting many facets of life. Milgram,
Batori, and Mowrer (1993) identify five categories of procrastinati-
on; (i) life routine procrastination, (ii) decisional procrastination,
(iii) neurotic procrastination, (iv) compulsive procrastination, and
(v) academic procrastination.
Each theory related procrastination tends to address one side of
procrastination problem and not the others. For example, behavio-
ral perspective used to in the reinforcement theory has been the
prevailing explanation of procrastination under the behavioral para-
digm. According to the tenets of behaviorism, procrastination can
be explained in terms of incentives students have for putting off
work and the absence of incentives for effort that contributes to go-
al attainment (Briody, 1980).
Within the psychology literature, earliest theories of procrastinati-
on came from the psychodynamic tradition, a school of psychology
that emphasizes childhood experiences as an influential factor in
adult personality, unconscious mental process as influences on
everyday behavior, and internal conflict as an underlying root of
most behavior (Matlin, 1995). As such, psychodynamic literature
primarily characterizes procrastination as a problematic behavioral
manifestation of underlying internal psychic drama, often involving
feelings about and towards one’s family.
Based on their extensive clinical experience working with procras-
tinators, Ellis and Knaus (1977) emphasized that the irrational na-
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 377
ture of procrastination and the ability of the procrastinators to acti-
vely identify, dispute and restructure their irrational beliefs, self
defeating cognitions to bring about desired behavioral and emotio-
nal chances. Although they have defined procrastination in techni-
cal sense as “putting off something until a future time-postponing
or deferring action on something you have decided to do”( p.7).
Ellis and Knaus (1977) characterized procrastination as resulting
from three basic and, often overlapping causes: self- downing (ne-
gative and disparaging self talk), low frustration tolerance, and hos-
tility. These three causes are viewed as manifestations of a cogniti-
ve style that involves unrealistic views about the self, others and
the world.
Literature on procrastination has revealed several possible causes.
The first cause is poor time management. If someone procrastina-
tes, it suggests that she/he is unable to manage time wisely. It also
implies an uncertainty of priorities, goals and objectives. It might
cause a person to feel overwhelmed when facing a task. Due to this
feeling, one postpones doing academic assignments until a later da-
te and instead chooses to focus on unproductive activities. The ina-
bility to concentrate on work is the second reason for procrastina-
ting. This difficulty may be due to a distraction in the environment,
such as noise, a cluttered study desk or attempting to do an assign-
ment on a bed. The third factor is fear and anxiety as related to fa-
ilure. A person in this category would spend more time worrying
about the work she/he has to do rather than completing it. Negati-
ve beliefs about one’s capabilities are the fourth reason to procras-
tinate. Personal problems may also hamper one’s progress in comp-
leting a task. In addition, unrealistic expectations and perfectio-
nism may be two other barriers for procrastinators.
Many contributing factors to procrastination have been identified
in the research literature, including feelings of being overwhelmed,
lack of motivation, perfectionism, poor time management, and or-
ganizational skills (Burka, & Yuen, 1990; Milgram, Marshevsky, &
Sadeh, 1995; Rothblum, Solomon, & Murakami, 1986; Solomon, &
Rothblum, 1984). Haycock et al. (1998) found that both low self-ef-
ficacy and high anxiety were the significant predictors of increased
procrastination for everyday, nonacademic activities. In addition,
several cognitive variables have been found to correlate with proc-
378 • EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE
rastination, including irrational beliefs, external attribution styles,
and beliefs regarding time (Haycock, 1993).
Research has revealed that procrastination is related to low grades,
low self-esteem, self-discipline and self-efficacy as well as ineffec-
tive learning skills, boredom, task assertiveness, anxiety, depressi-
on, fear of failure, irrational thinking, cheating, time management
and instant gratification (Chissom & Iran-Nejad, 1992; Ferrari,
Johnson, & McCown, 1995; Ferrari & Beck, 1998; Haycock,
McCarthy, & Skay, 1998; Lay, 1986; Senecal, Koestner, & Valle-
rand, 1995; Solomon, & Rothblum, 1984). In regards to the relati-
onship between procrastination and personality, the literature sug-
gests that procrastination is consistently associated with both ne-
uroticism and conscientiousness of the Five-Factor Model of Per-
sonality. Procrastination is positively correlated with Neuroticism
and has a strong opposite relationship with Conscientiousness
(Johnson, & Bloom, 1995, Lay et al., 1998, Milgram, & Tenne,
2000; Schouwenburg, & Lay, 1995). Other research suggests that
procrastination is positively related to perfectionism (Ferrari, 1992;
Martin et al., 1996).
General counseling and psychotherapy techniques have yielded so-
me improvement with procrastination; however, specific behavioral
and cognitive-behavioral techniques (such as systematic desensiti-
zation, relaxation training, rational emotive therapy, and stres ino-
culation training) appear to be more effective in reducing procras-
tination. Structured goal setting, breaking assignments down, and
changing cognitive styles such as perfectionism and fears of failure
or success are common core strategies used to help students redu-
ce their academic procrastination.
Given that there is such a high occurrence of procrastination in both
the academic and general populations, it is important to understand
its undesirable consequences. People suffer from procrastination in
varying degrees and its negative consequences are felt in many are-
as of their lives, such as academics, work, career, marriage, social re-
lations and financial management.
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 379
Kaynakça / References
Abry, D. A. (1999). A structural model of self-regulatory behavior and college stu-
dent achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University,
Florida.
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and
impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463-496.
Aitken, M. E. (1982). A personality profile of the college student procrastinator.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive
theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Berzonsky, M. D., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Identity orientation and decisional
strategies. Personality and Individual Differences,20, 597-606.
Beswick, G., Rothblum, E. D., & Mann, L. (1988). Psychological antecedents
of student procrastination. Australian Psychologist,23, 207-217.
Blankstein, K. R., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Eng, A. (1993). Dimensions of
perfectionism and irrational fears: An examination with the fear survey schedu-
le. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 323-328.
Boice, R. (1996). Procrastination and blocking: A novel, practical approach.
Westport, CT, USA: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.
Bridges, K. R., & Roig, M. (1997) Academic procrastination and irrational thin-
king: A re-examination with context controlled. Persosonaliy and Individual
Differences, 22, 941-944.
Briody, R. (1980). An exploratory study of procrastination. Unpublished docto-
ral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Illion, USA
Burka, J. B., & Yuen, L. M. (1983). Procrastination: Why you do it, what to do
about it. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chissom, B., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1992). Development of an instrument to assess
learning strategies. Psychological Reports,71, 1001-1002.
Clark, J. L., & Hill, O. W. (1994). Academic procrastination among African-
American college students. Psychological Reports, 75, 931-936
Davis, S. L. (1985). Predicting outcome of paradoxical and self-control interven-
tions from resistance and freedom of the target behavior among procrastinators.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Iowa.
Day, V., Mensink, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2000). Patterns of academic procrasti-
nation. Journal of College Reading and Learning,30, 120-134.
Devore, W. A. (1986). Paradoxical intervention: Effects in a short-term counse-
ling situation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colo-
rado.
Dole, A. A., Rockey, P. B., & DiTomasso, R. (1983). Meta-analysis of outcome
research in reducing test anxiety: Intervention, rigor, and inertia. (Eric Docu-
ment Reproduction Service, No. ED231 844).
Effert, B. R., & Ferrari, J. R. (1989). Decisional procrastination: Examining per-
sonality correlates. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 151-161.
380 • EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE
Elliott, T. R., Godshall, F., Shrout, J. R., & Witty, T. E. (1990). Problem-sol-
ving appraisal, self-reported study habits, and performance of academically at-
risk college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology,37, 203-207.
Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ellis, A. (1989). Comments on my critics. In M. E. Bernard & R. DiGiuseppe
(Eds.), Inside rational-emotive therapy: A critical appraisal of the theory and the-
rapy of Albert Ellis (pp. 199-233). San Diego: Academic Press.
Ellis, A., & Knaus, W. J. (1977). Overcoming procrastination. New York: Signet
Books.
Farran, B. (2004). Predictors of Academic Procrastination ›n College Students.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Fordham University, New York.
Ferrari J., Parker, J., & Ware, C. (1992). Academic procrastination: Personality
correlates with Myers-Briggs types, self-efficacy, and academic locus of control.
Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 495-502.
Ferrari, J. R. (1991). Compulsive procrastination: Some self-reported characte-
ristics. Psychological Reports, 68, 455-458.
Ferrari, J. R. (1992). Procrastinators and perfect behavior: An exploratory factor
analysis of self-presentation, self-awareness, and self-handicapping compo-
nents. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 75-84.
Ferrari, J. R. (1994). Dysfunctional procrastination and its relationship with self-
esteem, interpersonal dependency, and self-defeating behaviors. Personality
and Individual Differences, 17, 673-679.
Ferrari, J. R. (1995). Perfectionism cognitions with nonclinical and clinical
samples. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 143-156.
Ferrari, J. R., & Beck, B. (1998). Affective responses before and after fraudu-
lent excuses by academic procrastinators. Education, 118, 529-537.
Ferrari, J. R., & Olivette, M. J. (1994). Parental authority and the development
of female dysfunctional procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality, 28,
87-100.
Ferrari, J. R., Harriott, J. S. & Zimmerman, M.(1999). The social support net-
works of procrastinators: Friends or family in times of trouble? Personality and
Individual Differences, 26, 321-331.
Ferrari, J. R., Harriott, J. S., Evans, L., Lecik-Michna, D. M., & Wenger, J. M.
(1997) Exploring the time preferences of procrastinators: Night or day, which is
the one? European Journal of Personality, 11(3), 187-196
Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L., & McCown, W. G. (1995). Procrastination and task
avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. New York: Plenum Press.
Flett, G. L., Blankstein, K. R., & Martin, T. R. (1995). Procrastination, negati-
ve self evaluation, and stress in depression and anxiety: A review and prelimi-
nary model. In J. R. Ferrari & J. L. Johnson (Eds.), Procrastination and task
avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. The Plenum series in social/clinical
psychology (pp. 137-167). New York: Plenum Press.
Flett, G. L., Blankstein, K. R., Hewwit, P. L., & Koledin, S. (1992). Compo-
nents of perfectionism and procrastination. Social Behavior and Personality, 20
(2), 85-94.
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 381
Frost, R. O., & Shows, R. L. (1993). The nature and measurement of compul-
sive indecisiveness. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 31, 683-692.
Green, G. D. (1981). Dissertation procrastination. Unpublished doctoral disser-
tation, University of Washington.
Green, L. (1982). Minority students’ self-control of procrastination. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 29, 636-644.
Guilfoyle, E. C. (1986). The effects of psychological reactance and paradoxical
and self-directive forms of brief psychotherapy on procrastination. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
Harriott, J., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Prevalence of procrastination among samp-
les of adults. Psychological Reports, 78, 611-616.
Haycock, L. A. (1993). The cognitive mediation of procrastination: An investi-
gation of the relationship between procrastination and self-efficacy beliefs. Un-
published doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minesota.
Haycock, L. A., McCarthy, P., & Skay, C. L. (1998). Procrastination in college
students: The role of self-efficacy and anxiety. Journal of Counseling and De-
velopment, 76, 317-324.
Heppner, P. P. (1978). A review of the problem solving literature and ›t’s rela-
tionship to the counseling process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 366-
375.
Hurley, L. K. (1986). The use of therapeutic metaphor to produce behavior
change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, American University, Washington,
DC.
Ishiyama, F. I. (1990a). A Japanese perspective on client inaction: Removing at-
titudinal blocks through Morita therapy. Journal of Counseling & Development,
68, 566-570.
Ishiyama, F. I. (1990b). Japanese perspective on client inaction and procrasti-
nation: Morita therapy. International Journal for the Advancement of Counsel-
ling,13 (2), 119-128.
Johnson, J. L., & Bloom, A. M. (1995). An analysis of the contribution of the fi-
ve factors of personality to variance in academic procrastination. Personality and
Individual Differences, 18, 127-133.
Johnson, J. L., & Bloom, A. M. (1992). The relationship between procrastination
and personality. Unpublished Manuscript, Villanova University.
Knaus, W. J. (1998). Do it now! Break the procrastination habit. New York: John
Wiley.
Lay, C. H. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Re-
search in Personality, 20, 474-495.
Lay, C. H., & Burns, P. (1991). Intentions and behavior in studying for an exa-
mination: The role of trait procrastination and its interaction with optimism. Jo-
urnal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 605-617.
Lay, C. H., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1993). Trait procrastination, time mana-
gement, and academic behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8,
647-662.
382 • EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE
Lay, C., Kovacs, A., & Danto, D. (1998). The relation of trait procrastination to
the big-five factor conscientiousness: An assessment with primary-junior scho-
ol children based on self-report scales. Personality & Individual Differences, 25,
187-193
Lee, D., Kely, K. R. & Edwards, J. K. (2005). A closer look at the relationships
among trait procrastination, neuroticism, and conscientiousness. Personality
and Individual Differences, 40, 27-37.
Lerner, S. I. (1987). Procrastination: A comparison of two strategies for strategic
intervention. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Loebenstein, A. M. (1996). The effects of subgoal setting and academic self-effi-
cacy on procrastination (self-efficacy). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cali-
fornia School of Professional Psychology, San Diego.
Lopez, F., & Wambach, C. (1982). Effects of paradoxical and self-control direc-
tives in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 115-124.
MacIntyre, P. (1964). Dynamics and treatment of passive aggressive underac-
hievers. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 18, 95-108
Matlin, M.W. (1995). Psychology (2nd ed.).Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Col-
lege Publishers
Martin, T. R., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Krames, L., & Szanto, G. (1996). Per-
sonality correlates of depression and health symptoms: A test of a self- regula-
tion model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 264-277.
McCown, W., Petzel, T., & Rupert, P. (1987). An experimental study of some
hypothesized behaviors and personality variables of college student procrasti-
nators. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 781-786.
Micek, L. (1982). Some problems of self-autoregulation of volitional processes
in university students from the point of view of their mental health. Sbornik
Praci Filosoficke Fakulty Brnenske University, 31(17), 51-70.
Milgram, N. A., Batori, G., & Mowrer, D. (1993). Correlates of academic proc-
rastination. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 487-500.
Milgram, N., Marshevsky, S., & Sadeh, C. (1995). Correlates of academic proc-
rastination: Discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability. Journal of
Psychology, 129, 145-155
Milgram, N. N., & Tenne, R. (2000). Personality correlates of decisional and
task avoidant procrastination. European Journal of Personality, 14, 141-156.
Milgram, N., Mey-Tal, G., & Levison, Y. (1998). Procrastination, generalized or
specific, in college students and their parents. Personality and Individual Dif-
ferences, 25, 297-316.
Milgram, N.A. (1987) The many faces of procrastination: Implications and re-
commendations for counselor. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED
290 103)
Missildine, H. (1963). Your inner child of past. New York: Simon and Shuster.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Academic procrastinators and perfectionistic ten-
dencies among graduate students [Special Issue]. Journal of Social Behavior
and Personality, 15 (5), 103-110.
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 383
Potts, T. J. (1987). Predicting procrastination on academic tasks with self-report
personality measures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University,
New York.
Powers, B. E. (1984). The effects of self-management program using productive
avoidance or premack principle as self-interventions on procrastination behavior.
Unpublished master’s thesis, United States International University, San Die-
go.
Richards, C. S. (1975). Behavior modification of studying through study skills
advice and self-control procedures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22, 431-
436.
Rothblum, E. D. (1990). Fear of failure: The psychodinamic, need achievement,
fear of success and procrastination models. Handbook of social and evulation an-
xiety. Newyork: Plenum Press.
Rothblum, E. D., Solomon, L. J., & Murakami, J. (1986). Affective, cognitive,
and behavioral differences between high and low procrastinators. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 33, 387-394
Saddler, C. D., & Sacks, L. A. (1993). Multidimensional perfectionism and aca-
demic procrastination: Relationships with depression in university students.
Psychological Reports, 73, 863-871.
Schouwenburg, H. C., & Lay, C. H. (1995). Trait procrastination and the big-
five factors of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 481-490.
Schubert Walker, L. J. (2004). Overcorning the powerlessness of procrastinati-
on. Canadian Journal of Guidance and Counselling. In H. C. Schouwenburg, C.
H. Lay , Timothy A. Pychyl, Joseph R. Ferrari, (Ed.), Counseling the procrasti-
nator in academic settings (pp. 75-89). Washington, DC: American Psychologi-
cal Association.
Senécal, C., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (1995). Self-regulation and acade-
mic procrastination. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 607-619.
Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequ-
ency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31,
503-509.
Sommer, W. G. (1990). Procrastination and cramming: How adept students ace
the system. Journal of American College Health, 39, 5-10.
Strong, S. R., Wambach, C. A., Lopez, F. G., & Cooper, R. K. (1979). Motiva-
tional and equipping function of interpretation in counseling. Journal of Coun-
seling Psychology, 26, 98-109.
Tuckman, B. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procras-
tination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 473-480.
Van Nes, R. (1988). Eliminating procrastination without putting if off. Bloo-
mington, Indiana: Phi Delta Kapa Educational Foundation.
Vodanovich, S. J., & Seib, H. M. (1997). Relationship between time structure
and procrastination. Psychological Reports, 80, 211-215.
Watson, D. C. (2001). Procrastination and the five-factor model: A facet level
analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 149-158
384 • EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE
Wesley, J. C. (1994). Effects of ability, high school achievement, and procrasti-
natory behavior on college performance. Educational and Psychological Measu-
rement, 54, 404-408.
Yaakub, N. F. (2000). Procrastination among students in institutes of higher le-
arning: Challenges for k-economy. The School of Languages and Scientific
Thinking, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Retrieved May 10, 2005, from,
http://mahdzan.com/papers/procrastinate/.
Young, J. R. (1982) A Paradoxical treatment versus a behavioral approach in tre-
atment of procrastination of studying. Dissertation Abstracts International,
North Texas State University, Texas, USA
Ziesat, H. A., Rosenthal, T. L., & White, G. M. (1978). Behavioral self-control
in treating procrastination of studying. Psychological Reports, 42, 59-69
Zinger, D. J. (1983). Procrastination: To do or not to do? School Guidance Wor-
ker, 39, 9-15.
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 385
... al., 2012). Balkis and Duru (2007) have identified five different categories of procrastination behaviour-life routine, decisional, compulsive, neurotic, and finally academic procrastination. Life routine procrastination is when the person is unable to schedule daily life activities and follow the routine as per schedule (Milgram et al., 1988). ...
... A few factors that are found to have a high influence on procrastination among students are perfectionism (Jadidi et al., 2011;Çapan, 2010), fear of failure (Flett et al., 1992;Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), and aversiveness to tasks Solomon & Rothblum, 1984). Also, there are a few psychosocial causes and correlates of procrastination, such as motivation for achievement (Munavara & Thomas, 2020), lack of time management skills (Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), boredom (Balkis & Duru, 2007;Sümer & Büttner, 2022), distractibility (Svartdal et al., 2020), thrill-seeking (Ferrari, 2000), and lack of organizational skills (Balkis & Duru, 2007). Psychological factors such as depression, high anxiety and low self efficacy (Balkis & Duru, 2007), impulsiveness (Steel & Ferrari, 2013), etc. also influence procrastination. ...
... A few factors that are found to have a high influence on procrastination among students are perfectionism (Jadidi et al., 2011;Çapan, 2010), fear of failure (Flett et al., 1992;Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), and aversiveness to tasks Solomon & Rothblum, 1984). Also, there are a few psychosocial causes and correlates of procrastination, such as motivation for achievement (Munavara & Thomas, 2020), lack of time management skills (Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), boredom (Balkis & Duru, 2007;Sümer & Büttner, 2022), distractibility (Svartdal et al., 2020), thrill-seeking (Ferrari, 2000), and lack of organizational skills (Balkis & Duru, 2007). Psychological factors such as depression, high anxiety and low self efficacy (Balkis & Duru, 2007), impulsiveness (Steel & Ferrari, 2013), etc. also influence procrastination. ...
Article
Full-text available
Academic procrastination is one of the main problems students encounter during studying. It affects their mental health, academic performance, and even everyday activities. A lack of time management was once thought to be the cause of procrastination. Procrastination, however, has been linked to mood control, according to recent studies. Decision-making is also a factor that is influenced by emotion or a person’s affect. The present study aims to find whether decision-making and affective styles influence academic procrastination among Indian students. The participants (N = 211) who are currently studying any discipline in a regular mode and who are between the ages of 17 to 30 years (mean = 21.10 & SD = 2.168) were selected using purposive sampling, and data was collected online using Academic Procrastination Scale, General Decision-Making Style Instrument and Affective Style Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation, along with multiple regression analysis. Results found a significant inverse correlation between rational decision-making and academic procrastination and a weak inverse correlation between adjusting affective style and academic procrastination. A significant positive correlation between avoidant decision-making and academic procrastination was also found. Through regression analysis avoidance, decision-making has been found as a positive predictor of academic procrastination along with rational decision-making, and spontaneous decision-making as negative predictors. No significant correlations were found for academic procrastination with intuitive, dependent, spontaneous, concealing, and tolerating styles. The current results contribute to the existing literature on academic procrastination and the development of effective strategies to reduce academic procrastination by managing unhealthy decision-making styles.
... Mostly, existing research focuses on organizing psycho-educational programmes on the management of these maladaptive behaviours, providing counselling and highlighting the need to create and increase awareness through seminars and conferences (Balkis & Duru, 2012;Kandemir, 2010;Ozer and Altun, 2016;Uzun, 2010). In Nigerian situation, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on the effect of CBT on reducing maladaptive behaviours of students in Enugu State, Nigeria. ...
... Lack of effective intervention programmes have been emphasized in limiting managing maladaptive behaviour. Researchers have focused on organizing psychoeducational programmes on the management of maladaptive behaviours (Balkis & Duru, 2012;Kandemir, 2010;Ozer and Allun, 2016;Uzun, 2010). Bkoyo (2015) found that CBT is a remedy for maladaptive behaviours. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The study investigated the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in the reduction of on maladaptive behaviour of undergraduate students. The purpose for the study came as a result of the increasing rate of maladaptive behaviour to which the researchers sought to find solutions. Pre-test-post-test randomized control trial experimental design was adopted by the researchers for the study. Methodology: Sixty-four (64) maladaptive undergraduate students who were drawn through proportionate stratified random sampling technique constituted the sample for the study. The maladaptive students were randomly assigned to experimental (34) and control (30) groups. Maladaptive Assessment Scale for Students (MASS) and Maladaptive Behaviour Scale (MBS) were used for data collection. MASS and MBS were properly validated by experts in test development and the internal consistency reliability indices of the items estimated as 0.79 and 0.81 respectively using cronbach alpha method. Before the commencement of the testing and treatment package, the researchers assured the participants of confidentiality of interactions and personal information as they work together in self-disclosure. Thereafter, pre-treatment assessment (pre-test) was conducted using the MASS and MBS in order to collect baseline data (Time 1). After that, the experimental group was exposed to 90 minutes of the CBT programme twice a week for a period of 6 weeks. The treatment took place between September and November 2019. Post-test (Time 2) assessment was conducted 1 week after the last treatment (Time 3). Data collected were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: The findings of the study revealed that the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy on reducing the maladaptive behaviour of undergraduate students was significant at post-test and follow-up measures. One of the contributions of the findings is that if undergraduate students are not properly counselled, their maladaptive behaviours will continue to increase. Unique contribution to theory, policy and practice: Based on the findings, it was recommended among others that Federal Government or relevant education authorities should provide enough guidance counsellors in the various institutions of higher learning who will assist in the counselling of the students on the dangers of maladaptive behaviours using CBT. It is also recommended that counselors, psychologists among others should adopt cognitive behavioural therapy for handling maladaptive behaviour.
... (Steel, 2007) La procrastinación se define como el "fenómeno en el cual una persona descuida asistir a una responsabilidad necesaria, como una tarea o decisión, de manera oportuna, a menudo a pesar de sus buenas intenciones o inevitables consecuencias negativas y desagradables". (Balkis & Duru, 2007) Independientemente de su edad, las personas procrastinan de vez en cuando, pero el problema surge cuando se convierte en un hábito. ...
Article
Full-text available
La educación pasó por una crisis existencial producida por la Pandemia y el confinamiento, generando cambios forzados en los componentes del sistema enseñanza aprendizaje. La procrastinación académica como fenómeno de postergar actividades, tiende a generar niveles de estrés, ansiedad y bajo rendimiento académico. Objetivo: distinguir factores asociados a la procrastinación académica de los estudiantes de carreras en salud en la modalidad educativa virtual. Metodología: estudio descriptivo, transversal a 269 estudiantes, que accedieron a la modalidad educativa virtual. Resultados: la prevalencia de procrastinación es del 48%. Entre los motivos se mencionan: la falta de materiales físicos, la ausencia de entrenamiento en el uso de bibliotecas virtuales, la ausencia de interacción física con el docente, la falta de acceso a equipos informáticos, la inestabilidad de la conexión a internet, el costo de dicha conexión. Esto se asocia a efectos en la salud mental de los estudiantes pues refieren en un 63% estrés, 75% ansiedad y 23% impaciencia, disgusto y temor. Conclusión: La Procrastinación no es solo un problema de la gestión o administración del tiempo en el proceso de enseñanza aprendizaje, es una situación compleja de componentes afectivos, motivacionales y conductuales en el proceso cognitivo que afecta al rendimiento académico.
... Por lo tanto, elementos de intervención en materia de procrastinación que han resultado exitosos en el contexto terapéutico podrían incorporarse en el contexto académico. Por ejemplo, la Terapia Cognitivo Conductual (Balkis y Duru, 2007;Rozental et al., 2018), los principios de la Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso (López-López et al., 2020) o los principios de la Terapia Racional Emotiva de Albert Ellis (Ozer et al., 2013). Es importante que el profesor tenga en cuenta que la inmadurez es un factor de riesgo de la procrastinación (Kim y Seo, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
La procrastinación es un déficit motivacional que conduce a dificultades académicas, psicológicas y de salud en el alumnado. Se exploran las experiencias y emociones sobre la procrastinación en alumnado universitario con tres niveles de riesgo académico, y sus posibles implicaciones para la orientación académica en la educación superior. El estudio empleó grupos de discusión y analiza los discursos mediante un procedimiento de categorización progresiva. Participaron 21 universitarios en tres grupos de riesgo académico bajo (7), moderado (8) y alto (6); entre los 17 y 23 años, de cinco titulaciones y de segundo a cuarto curso. Se hallaron fuertes emociones negativas asociadas a la procrastinación y componentes motivacionales, como la falta de interés en las tareas, diferenciadas de acuerdo con el riesgo académico. Se discuten las posibles implicaciones para la orientación pedagógica ofreciendo pautas de cara al tratamiento de la procrastinación desde una perspectiva preventiva. Para ello diferenciamos factores internos del alumnado, tales como capacidad, motivación, organización y gestión el tiempo. Factores externos relativos a las situaciones en los que se desarrolla el aprendizaje, como el tipo y extensión de los trabajos, la generación de un reto óptimo o la hetero-regulación docente recordando el calendario de actividades. Se recomiendan diferentes estrategias de orientación, prestando atención a la interacción entre estudiantes y entre estudiantes y el docente.
... In the past two decades, there has been an extensive increase in the interest in procrastination (Ko & Chang, 2019). Worldwide, approximately 20% to 25% of adolescents and adults suffer from chronic procrastination tendencies in their work and personal lives (Balkis & Duru, 2007;Ferrari & Díaz-Morales, 2014;Ko & Chang, 2019). While, it was reported that 70% of college students consider themselves academic procrastinators (Schouwenburg, Lay, Pychyl, & Ferrari, 2004). ...
Article
Full-text available
The main aim of the current study was the examines the relationship between procrastination, Negative Emotions, and mental well-being. Participants from Saudi Arabia (n = 886; females 344, 38.8% and 542 males, 61.2%; Mage = 24.33, SD = 5.68). Participants completed online questionnaires on the Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), and the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). As hypothesized, males procrastinated more than females. Furthermore, single ones procrastinated more than married ones. Depending on the study assumption that procrastination and negative emotional symptoms are related to poorer mental well-being, procrastination is related to higher levels of DASS-21 and decreased well-being. These findings suggest that age, gender, depression, stress, anxiety, and Well-being were predictive of procrastination. Findings add to the psychological literature and improve a better comprehension of the complicated associations between Procrastination, Negative Emotions, and Well-Being. El objetivo principal del presente estudio fue examinar la relación entre la procrastinación, las emociones negativas y el bienestar mental. Participantes de Arabia Saudita (n = 886; mujeres 344, 38.8% y 542 hombres, 61.2%; Medad = 24.33, SD = 5.68). Los participantes completaron cuestionarios en línea sobre la Escala de procrastinación irracional (IPS), las Escalas de estrés por depresión, ansiedad (DASS-21) y el Formulario corto continuo de salud mental (MHC-SF). Según la hipótesis, los hombres postergaron las cosas más que las mujeres. Además, los solteros postergaban más que los casados. Dependiendo de la hipótesis del estudio de que la procrastinación y los síntomas emocionales negativos están relacionados con un peor bienestar mental, la procrastinación está relacionada con niveles más altos de DASS-21 y una disminución del bienestar. Estos hallazgos sugieren que la edad, el género, la depresión, el estrés, la ansiedad y el bienestar eran factores predictivos de la procrastinación. Los hallazgos se suman a la literatura psicológica y mejoran una mejor comprensión de las complicadas asociaciones entre la procastinación, las emociones negativas y el bienestar.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
هراس اجتماعی عموماً یک تخریب اساسی در فرایند پردازش اطلاعات افکار نگرش ها و اعتقادات در نظر گرفته شده که باعث تحریک و نگهداری عواطف و رفتارهای وابسته به هراس اجتماعی می‌شود. پژوهشگران تحریف های فکری معینی چون بی‌کفایتی ادراک شده و ترس از ارزیابی منفی را از عوامل ایجاد هراس اجتماعی معرفی کردند اما انتظار می‌رود که اگر فردی محیط را حمایتگر ارزیابی کند در شرایط تنش زا بتواند به طور موثرتری با موقعیت کنار آمده و راهکارهای لازم را اتخاذ کند. بر این اساس هدف پژوهش حاضر رابطه بین جهت گیری زندگی و هراس اجتماعی در دانشجویان می باشد. ۱۱۸ دانشجو (۶۶ دختر و ۵۲ پسر) که به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای تصادفی انتخاب شده بودند مقیاس جهت گیری زندگی و مقیاس هراس اجتماعی را تکمیل نمودند. اعتبار و روایی ابزار های مورد استفاده احراز گردیده است. اطلاعات جمع آوری شده با استفاده از تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه به‌روش همزمان مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. یافته ها نشان داد که جهت گیری زندگی قادر به پیش بینی منفی و معنادار هراس اجتماعی است. همچنین بین دختران و پسران از لحاظ جهت گیری به زندگی تفاوتی مشاهده نشد. نتیجه اینکه هر چه افراد نگرش مثبت تری به زندگی داشته باشند موقعیت های اجتماعی یا غیر اجتماعی را بیشتر موافق با خواسته خود ارزیابی کرده و بنابراین هراس اجتماعی کمتری را تجربه میکنند
Conference Paper
Full-text available
هراس اجتماعی عموماً یک تخریب اساسی در فرایند پردازش اطلاعات، افکار، نگرش ها و اعتقادات در نظر گرفته شده که باعث تحریک و نگهداری عواطف و رفتارهای وابسته به هراس اجتماعی می‌شود. پژوهشگران تحریف های فکری معینی چون بی‌کفایتی ادراک شده و ترس از ارزیابی منفی را از عوامل ایجاد هراس اجتماعی معرفی کرده اند اما انتظار می‌رود که اگر فردی محیط را حمایتگر ارزیابی کند در شرایط تنش زا بتواند به طور موثرتری با موقعیت کنار آمده و راهکارهای لازم را اتخاذ کند. بر این اساس هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی رابطه بین حمایت جتماعی ادراک شده و هراس اجتماعی در دانشجویان میباشد. ۱۱۸ دانشجو (۶۶ دختر و ۵۲ پسر) که به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای تصادفی انتخاب شده بودند مقیاس چند وجهی حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده و مقیاس هراس اجتماعی را تکمیل نمودند .اعتبار و روایی ابزار های مورد استفاده احراز گردیده است. اطلاعات جمع آوری شده با استفاده از تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه به‌روش همزمان مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. یافته ها نشان داد که حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده و قادر به پیش بینی منفی و معنادار هراس اجتماعی می باشد. همچنین بین میانگین نمرات دانشجویان دختر و پسر از لحاظ هراس اجتماعی نیز تفاوت معناداری مشاهده نگردید. نتیجه اینکه ادراک محیط اجتماعی و خانواده به عنوان محیطی حمایتگر پیش بینی کننده کاهش میزان هراس اجتماعی در دانشجویان است
Conference Paper
Full-text available
خودکارآمدی و اجتماعی به باور افراد در مورد توانایی هایشان برای صحیح عمل کردن در موقعیت های اجتماعی اشاره دارد. افرادی که دارای نگرش مثبتی به زندگی هستند به ارزیابی آنچه می توانند به دست آورند در برابر آنچه قادر به کسب آن نیستند، می‌پردازند. اینگونه افراد موفقیت های اجتماعی خود را به توانایی های درونی خود نسبت می‌دهند که همین مسئله می‌تواند زمینه‌ساز افزایش میزان خودکارآمدی اجتماعی در این افراد باشد. بر این اساس هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی رابطه بین جهت گیری زندگی و خودکارآمدی اجتماعی در دانشجویان میباشد. ۱۱۸ دانشجو (۶۶ دختر و ۵۲ پسر) که به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای تصادفی انتخاب شده بودند مقیاس جهت گیری زندگی و پرسشنامه خودکارآمدی در موقعیت های اجتماعی را تکمیل نمودند. پایایی و روایی ابزار های مورد استفاده احراز گردیده است. اطلاعات جمع آوری شده با استفاده از تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه به‌روش همزمان مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار قرار گرفت. یافته ها نشان داد که جهت‌گیری به زندگی قادر به پیش بینی مثبت و معنادار خودکارآمدی اجتماعی است. همچنین بین دختران و پسران از لحاظ خودکارآمدی اجتماعی تفاوتی مشاهده نشد. نتیجه اینکه هر چه افراد نگرش مثبت تری به زندگی داشته باشند موقعیت های اجتماعی یا غیر اجتماعی را بیشتر موافق با خواست خود ارزیابی کرده و بنابراین خودکارآمدی اجتماعی بیشتری را احساس می کنند
Article
Full-text available
Psychological research, nowadays, on the areas of student´s health and well-being has shown interesting results where the central constructs are self-regulation and procrastination. Self-regulation behavior is a meta-skill that includes cognitive, affective, and motivational aspects of the individuals. Procrastination can be defined as a meta-skill (a self-regulatory failure) that implies active de-regulatory conduct. The evidence points out that self-regulation contributes to the prediction of well-being, health, and academic procrastination. This study aims to establish procrastination´s direct and indirect effects on students´ well-being and academic performance, being self-regulation and bad habits the mediators. A total of 710 college students from 16 to 53 years of age took part (Average of 20.8 and SD 4.3), 224 (31.5%) were men and 486 (68.5%) women. Two mediational analyses were carried out. Results indicate the significance of the proposed model as procrastination does not directly affect the student´s psychological well-being or academic performance. The conclusions point out that procrastination indirectly affects students´ well-being, academic performance, and bad habits, being self-regulation a mediating variable. The possible theoretical, methodological, and psychoeducational intervention implications are discussed.
Article
Psychological research, nowadays, on the areas of student´s health and well-being has shown interesting results where the central constructs are self-regulation and procrastination. Self-regulation behavior is a meta-skill that includes cognitive, affective, and motivational aspects of the individuals. Procrastination can be defined as a meta-skill (a self-regulatory failure) that implies active de-regulatory conduct. The evidence points out that self-regulation contributes to the prediction of well-being, health, and academic procrastination. This study aims to establish procrastination´s direct and indirect effects on students´ well-being and academic performance, being self-regulation and bad habits the mediators. A total of 710 college students from 16 to 53 years of age took part (Average of 20.8 and SD 4.3), 224 (31.5%) were men and 486 (68.5%) women. Two mediational analyses were carried out. Results indicate the significance of the proposed model as procrastination does not directly affect the student´s psychological well-being or academic performance. The conclusions point out that procrastination indirectly affects students´ well-being, academic performance, and bad habits, being self-regulation a mediating variable. The possible theoretical, methodological, and psychoeducational intervention implications are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
In Sample 1, 46 procrastinators compared with 52 nonprocrastinators claimed lower self-esteem, greater public self-consciousness and social anxiety, and a stronger tendency toward self-handicapping. In Sample 2, 48 procrastinators compared with 54 nonprocrastinators reported a weaker tendency toward seeking self-identity information but a stronger tendency toward a diffuse-identity style, yet there were no significant differences in verbal and abstract thinking abilities. Further research must provide evidence for persistent procrastination as a personality disorder that includes anxiety, avoidance, and a fear of evaluation of ability.
Article
Research has documented that most college students delay on academic tasks. Surprisingly, graduate students may procrastinate on academic tasks even more than do undergraduate students. Perfectionism also has been found to be high among graduate students. It is likely that for graduate students, delaying academic tasks such as writing a term paper is indicative of perfectionism. Thus, this study investigated the relationship between academic procrastination and perfectionism among 135 graduate students, who were administered the Procrastination Assessment Scale-Students and the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. A canonical correlation analysis revealed that fear of failure, a component of academic procrastination was related to self-oriented perfectionism and socially prescribed perfectionism. Other-oriented perfectionism, the third dimension of perfectionism, acted as a suppressor variable. Implications are discussed.
Article
Procrastination has been viewed both as a single trait dimension and as a complex trait composed of several component antecedents. The aim of this study was to investigate some of the antecedents of procrastination (fear of failure, aversiveness of task, risk taking, rebellion against control, dependency, and difficulty making decisions) in terms of the five factors of personality (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Openness and Conscientiousness). The participants consisted of 349 university students who completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and the Procrastination Assessment Scale for students. Total procrastination was related to both the low conscientiousness facets (competence, order, dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline, deliberation) and the neuroticism facets (anxiety, depression, self-consciousness, impulsiveness, vulnerability). When the procrastination antecedents were considered, task aversiveness had a strong relationship to both low conscientiousness and neuroticism. Fear of failure, difficulty making decisions, and dependency had a smaller relationship to several of the conscientiousness and neuroticism facets. In addition, risk-taking was negatively related to agreeableness and the fantasy facet of openness to experience was related to total procrastination.