ArticlePDF Available

The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination in the Framework of Psychological Counseling and Guidance

Authors:

Abstract

It is important to understand causes and consequences of procrastination that appear common among general and academic populations. Procrastination affects people in various domains of life such as academic, professional, social relationships, and finance management. A person with high procrastination may lose his/her work, drop out from school, or may endanger his/her marital life. Similarly, high procrastinators might increasingly experience psychological distress related to lack of sense of personal control, self-worth and lack of sense of self-perceived personal ability as deadlines approach. The purpose of this study is to present theoretical and conceptual frames of procrastination that are important variables of individual difference and are common in general and academic populations.
The Evaluation of the Major
Characteristics and Aspects of the
Procrastination in the Framework
of Psychological Counseling and
Guidance.
Murat BALKIS, Erdinç DURU
Abstract
It is important to understand causes and consequences of procrastination that is ap-
peared common among general and academic population. Procrastination affects pe-
ople in various domains of life such as academic, professional, social relationships,
and finance management. A person with high procrastination may lose his/her work,
drop out from school, or may endanger his/her marital life. Similarly, High procrasti-
nators might increasingly experience psychological distress related to lack of sense
of personal control, self- worth and lack of sense of self-perceived personal ability as
deadlines approach. The purpose of this study presents theoretical and conceptual
frames of procrastination that is an important variable of individual difference and
common in general and academic population.
Key Words
Procrastination, Conceptual Framework, Psychological Counseling.
© 2007 E¤itim Dan›flmanl›¤› ve Araflt›rmalar› ‹letiflim Hizmetleri Tic. Ltd. fiti.
*Correspondence: Murat BALKIS, Ph.D., Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Department
of Educational Sciences, ‹ncilip›nar 20020 Denizli_ Turkey. E-Mail: mbalkis@pau.edu.tr
** Assit. Prof. Dr., Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Scien-
ces.
Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice
7(1) • January 2007 • 376-385
Procrastination is a phenomenon in which a person neglects to at-
tend to a necessary responsibility, such as a task or decision, in a ti-
mely fashion, often despite their good intentions or inevitable ne-
gative and unpleasant consequences. It is not unusual for people to
procrastinate occasionally, but for some, procrastination is a chronic
problem that causes considerable psychological discomfort and dis-
tress. Procrastination is especially common in the general and aca-
demic populations. Ellis and Knaus (1977) point out that 95% of
American college students procrastinate. In Solomon and Roth-
blum’s (1984) survey, 46% of students reported that they procrasti-
nate on academic tasks at least half of the time. Harriott and Ferra-
ri (1996) refer to procrastination as one of the least understood mi-
nor human miseries, affecting 15-25% of the population during the-
ir lifetime.
Procrastination is pervasive, affecting many facets of life. Milgram,
Batori, and Mowrer (1993) identify five categories of procrastinati-
on; (i) life routine procrastination, (ii) decisional procrastination,
(iii) neurotic procrastination, (iv) compulsive procrastination, and
(v) academic procrastination.
Each theory related procrastination tends to address one side of
procrastination problem and not the others. For example, behavio-
ral perspective used to in the reinforcement theory has been the
prevailing explanation of procrastination under the behavioral para-
digm. According to the tenets of behaviorism, procrastination can
be explained in terms of incentives students have for putting off
work and the absence of incentives for effort that contributes to go-
al attainment (Briody, 1980).
Within the psychology literature, earliest theories of procrastinati-
on came from the psychodynamic tradition, a school of psychology
that emphasizes childhood experiences as an influential factor in
adult personality, unconscious mental process as influences on
everyday behavior, and internal conflict as an underlying root of
most behavior (Matlin, 1995). As such, psychodynamic literature
primarily characterizes procrastination as a problematic behavioral
manifestation of underlying internal psychic drama, often involving
feelings about and towards one’s family.
Based on their extensive clinical experience working with procras-
tinators, Ellis and Knaus (1977) emphasized that the irrational na-
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 377
ture of procrastination and the ability of the procrastinators to acti-
vely identify, dispute and restructure their irrational beliefs, self
defeating cognitions to bring about desired behavioral and emotio-
nal chances. Although they have defined procrastination in techni-
cal sense as “putting off something until a future time-postponing
or deferring action on something you have decided to do”( p.7).
Ellis and Knaus (1977) characterized procrastination as resulting
from three basic and, often overlapping causes: self- downing (ne-
gative and disparaging self talk), low frustration tolerance, and hos-
tility. These three causes are viewed as manifestations of a cogniti-
ve style that involves unrealistic views about the self, others and
the world.
Literature on procrastination has revealed several possible causes.
The first cause is poor time management. If someone procrastina-
tes, it suggests that she/he is unable to manage time wisely. It also
implies an uncertainty of priorities, goals and objectives. It might
cause a person to feel overwhelmed when facing a task. Due to this
feeling, one postpones doing academic assignments until a later da-
te and instead chooses to focus on unproductive activities. The ina-
bility to concentrate on work is the second reason for procrastina-
ting. This difficulty may be due to a distraction in the environment,
such as noise, a cluttered study desk or attempting to do an assign-
ment on a bed. The third factor is fear and anxiety as related to fa-
ilure. A person in this category would spend more time worrying
about the work she/he has to do rather than completing it. Negati-
ve beliefs about one’s capabilities are the fourth reason to procras-
tinate. Personal problems may also hamper one’s progress in comp-
leting a task. In addition, unrealistic expectations and perfectio-
nism may be two other barriers for procrastinators.
Many contributing factors to procrastination have been identified
in the research literature, including feelings of being overwhelmed,
lack of motivation, perfectionism, poor time management, and or-
ganizational skills (Burka, & Yuen, 1990; Milgram, Marshevsky, &
Sadeh, 1995; Rothblum, Solomon, & Murakami, 1986; Solomon, &
Rothblum, 1984). Haycock et al. (1998) found that both low self-ef-
ficacy and high anxiety were the significant predictors of increased
procrastination for everyday, nonacademic activities. In addition,
several cognitive variables have been found to correlate with proc-
378 • EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE
rastination, including irrational beliefs, external attribution styles,
and beliefs regarding time (Haycock, 1993).
Research has revealed that procrastination is related to low grades,
low self-esteem, self-discipline and self-efficacy as well as ineffec-
tive learning skills, boredom, task assertiveness, anxiety, depressi-
on, fear of failure, irrational thinking, cheating, time management
and instant gratification (Chissom & Iran-Nejad, 1992; Ferrari,
Johnson, & McCown, 1995; Ferrari & Beck, 1998; Haycock,
McCarthy, & Skay, 1998; Lay, 1986; Senecal, Koestner, & Valle-
rand, 1995; Solomon, & Rothblum, 1984). In regards to the relati-
onship between procrastination and personality, the literature sug-
gests that procrastination is consistently associated with both ne-
uroticism and conscientiousness of the Five-Factor Model of Per-
sonality. Procrastination is positively correlated with Neuroticism
and has a strong opposite relationship with Conscientiousness
(Johnson, & Bloom, 1995, Lay et al., 1998, Milgram, & Tenne,
2000; Schouwenburg, & Lay, 1995). Other research suggests that
procrastination is positively related to perfectionism (Ferrari, 1992;
Martin et al., 1996).
General counseling and psychotherapy techniques have yielded so-
me improvement with procrastination; however, specific behavioral
and cognitive-behavioral techniques (such as systematic desensiti-
zation, relaxation training, rational emotive therapy, and stres ino-
culation training) appear to be more effective in reducing procras-
tination. Structured goal setting, breaking assignments down, and
changing cognitive styles such as perfectionism and fears of failure
or success are common core strategies used to help students redu-
ce their academic procrastination.
Given that there is such a high occurrence of procrastination in both
the academic and general populations, it is important to understand
its undesirable consequences. People suffer from procrastination in
varying degrees and its negative consequences are felt in many are-
as of their lives, such as academics, work, career, marriage, social re-
lations and financial management.
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 379
Kaynakça / References
Abry, D. A. (1999). A structural model of self-regulatory behavior and college stu-
dent achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University,
Florida.
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and
impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463-496.
Aitken, M. E. (1982). A personality profile of the college student procrastinator.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive
theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Berzonsky, M. D., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Identity orientation and decisional
strategies. Personality and Individual Differences,20, 597-606.
Beswick, G., Rothblum, E. D., & Mann, L. (1988). Psychological antecedents
of student procrastination. Australian Psychologist,23, 207-217.
Blankstein, K. R., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., & Eng, A. (1993). Dimensions of
perfectionism and irrational fears: An examination with the fear survey schedu-
le. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 323-328.
Boice, R. (1996). Procrastination and blocking: A novel, practical approach.
Westport, CT, USA: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.
Bridges, K. R., & Roig, M. (1997) Academic procrastination and irrational thin-
king: A re-examination with context controlled. Persosonaliy and Individual
Differences, 22, 941-944.
Briody, R. (1980). An exploratory study of procrastination. Unpublished docto-
ral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Illion, USA
Burka, J. B., & Yuen, L. M. (1983). Procrastination: Why you do it, what to do
about it. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chissom, B., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1992). Development of an instrument to assess
learning strategies. Psychological Reports,71, 1001-1002.
Clark, J. L., & Hill, O. W. (1994). Academic procrastination among African-
American college students. Psychological Reports, 75, 931-936
Davis, S. L. (1985). Predicting outcome of paradoxical and self-control interven-
tions from resistance and freedom of the target behavior among procrastinators.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Iowa.
Day, V., Mensink, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2000). Patterns of academic procrasti-
nation. Journal of College Reading and Learning,30, 120-134.
Devore, W. A. (1986). Paradoxical intervention: Effects in a short-term counse-
ling situation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colo-
rado.
Dole, A. A., Rockey, P. B., & DiTomasso, R. (1983). Meta-analysis of outcome
research in reducing test anxiety: Intervention, rigor, and inertia. (Eric Docu-
ment Reproduction Service, No. ED231 844).
Effert, B. R., & Ferrari, J. R. (1989). Decisional procrastination: Examining per-
sonality correlates. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 151-161.
380 • EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE
Elliott, T. R., Godshall, F., Shrout, J. R., & Witty, T. E. (1990). Problem-sol-
ving appraisal, self-reported study habits, and performance of academically at-
risk college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology,37, 203-207.
Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ellis, A. (1989). Comments on my critics. In M. E. Bernard & R. DiGiuseppe
(Eds.), Inside rational-emotive therapy: A critical appraisal of the theory and the-
rapy of Albert Ellis (pp. 199-233). San Diego: Academic Press.
Ellis, A., & Knaus, W. J. (1977). Overcoming procrastination. New York: Signet
Books.
Farran, B. (2004). Predictors of Academic Procrastination ›n College Students.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Fordham University, New York.
Ferrari J., Parker, J., & Ware, C. (1992). Academic procrastination: Personality
correlates with Myers-Briggs types, self-efficacy, and academic locus of control.
Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 495-502.
Ferrari, J. R. (1991). Compulsive procrastination: Some self-reported characte-
ristics. Psychological Reports, 68, 455-458.
Ferrari, J. R. (1992). Procrastinators and perfect behavior: An exploratory factor
analysis of self-presentation, self-awareness, and self-handicapping compo-
nents. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 75-84.
Ferrari, J. R. (1994). Dysfunctional procrastination and its relationship with self-
esteem, interpersonal dependency, and self-defeating behaviors. Personality
and Individual Differences, 17, 673-679.
Ferrari, J. R. (1995). Perfectionism cognitions with nonclinical and clinical
samples. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 143-156.
Ferrari, J. R., & Beck, B. (1998). Affective responses before and after fraudu-
lent excuses by academic procrastinators. Education, 118, 529-537.
Ferrari, J. R., & Olivette, M. J. (1994). Parental authority and the development
of female dysfunctional procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality, 28,
87-100.
Ferrari, J. R., Harriott, J. S. & Zimmerman, M.(1999). The social support net-
works of procrastinators: Friends or family in times of trouble? Personality and
Individual Differences, 26, 321-331.
Ferrari, J. R., Harriott, J. S., Evans, L., Lecik-Michna, D. M., & Wenger, J. M.
(1997) Exploring the time preferences of procrastinators: Night or day, which is
the one? European Journal of Personality, 11(3), 187-196
Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L., & McCown, W. G. (1995). Procrastination and task
avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. New York: Plenum Press.
Flett, G. L., Blankstein, K. R., & Martin, T. R. (1995). Procrastination, negati-
ve self evaluation, and stress in depression and anxiety: A review and prelimi-
nary model. In J. R. Ferrari & J. L. Johnson (Eds.), Procrastination and task
avoidance: Theory, research, and treatment. The Plenum series in social/clinical
psychology (pp. 137-167). New York: Plenum Press.
Flett, G. L., Blankstein, K. R., Hewwit, P. L., & Koledin, S. (1992). Compo-
nents of perfectionism and procrastination. Social Behavior and Personality, 20
(2), 85-94.
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 381
Frost, R. O., & Shows, R. L. (1993). The nature and measurement of compul-
sive indecisiveness. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 31, 683-692.
Green, G. D. (1981). Dissertation procrastination. Unpublished doctoral disser-
tation, University of Washington.
Green, L. (1982). Minority students’ self-control of procrastination. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 29, 636-644.
Guilfoyle, E. C. (1986). The effects of psychological reactance and paradoxical
and self-directive forms of brief psychotherapy on procrastination. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
Harriott, J., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Prevalence of procrastination among samp-
les of adults. Psychological Reports, 78, 611-616.
Haycock, L. A. (1993). The cognitive mediation of procrastination: An investi-
gation of the relationship between procrastination and self-efficacy beliefs. Un-
published doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minesota.
Haycock, L. A., McCarthy, P., & Skay, C. L. (1998). Procrastination in college
students: The role of self-efficacy and anxiety. Journal of Counseling and De-
velopment, 76, 317-324.
Heppner, P. P. (1978). A review of the problem solving literature and ›t’s rela-
tionship to the counseling process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 366-
375.
Hurley, L. K. (1986). The use of therapeutic metaphor to produce behavior
change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, American University, Washington,
DC.
Ishiyama, F. I. (1990a). A Japanese perspective on client inaction: Removing at-
titudinal blocks through Morita therapy. Journal of Counseling & Development,
68, 566-570.
Ishiyama, F. I. (1990b). Japanese perspective on client inaction and procrasti-
nation: Morita therapy. International Journal for the Advancement of Counsel-
ling,13 (2), 119-128.
Johnson, J. L., & Bloom, A. M. (1995). An analysis of the contribution of the fi-
ve factors of personality to variance in academic procrastination. Personality and
Individual Differences, 18, 127-133.
Johnson, J. L., & Bloom, A. M. (1992). The relationship between procrastination
and personality. Unpublished Manuscript, Villanova University.
Knaus, W. J. (1998). Do it now! Break the procrastination habit. New York: John
Wiley.
Lay, C. H. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Re-
search in Personality, 20, 474-495.
Lay, C. H., & Burns, P. (1991). Intentions and behavior in studying for an exa-
mination: The role of trait procrastination and its interaction with optimism. Jo-
urnal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 605-617.
Lay, C. H., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1993). Trait procrastination, time mana-
gement, and academic behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8,
647-662.
382 • EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE
Lay, C., Kovacs, A., & Danto, D. (1998). The relation of trait procrastination to
the big-five factor conscientiousness: An assessment with primary-junior scho-
ol children based on self-report scales. Personality & Individual Differences, 25,
187-193
Lee, D., Kely, K. R. & Edwards, J. K. (2005). A closer look at the relationships
among trait procrastination, neuroticism, and conscientiousness. Personality
and Individual Differences, 40, 27-37.
Lerner, S. I. (1987). Procrastination: A comparison of two strategies for strategic
intervention. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Loebenstein, A. M. (1996). The effects of subgoal setting and academic self-effi-
cacy on procrastination (self-efficacy). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cali-
fornia School of Professional Psychology, San Diego.
Lopez, F., & Wambach, C. (1982). Effects of paradoxical and self-control direc-
tives in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 115-124.
MacIntyre, P. (1964). Dynamics and treatment of passive aggressive underac-
hievers. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 18, 95-108
Matlin, M.W. (1995). Psychology (2nd ed.).Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Col-
lege Publishers
Martin, T. R., Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Krames, L., & Szanto, G. (1996). Per-
sonality correlates of depression and health symptoms: A test of a self- regula-
tion model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 264-277.
McCown, W., Petzel, T., & Rupert, P. (1987). An experimental study of some
hypothesized behaviors and personality variables of college student procrasti-
nators. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 781-786.
Micek, L. (1982). Some problems of self-autoregulation of volitional processes
in university students from the point of view of their mental health. Sbornik
Praci Filosoficke Fakulty Brnenske University, 31(17), 51-70.
Milgram, N. A., Batori, G., & Mowrer, D. (1993). Correlates of academic proc-
rastination. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 487-500.
Milgram, N., Marshevsky, S., & Sadeh, C. (1995). Correlates of academic proc-
rastination: Discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability. Journal of
Psychology, 129, 145-155
Milgram, N. N., & Tenne, R. (2000). Personality correlates of decisional and
task avoidant procrastination. European Journal of Personality, 14, 141-156.
Milgram, N., Mey-Tal, G., & Levison, Y. (1998). Procrastination, generalized or
specific, in college students and their parents. Personality and Individual Dif-
ferences, 25, 297-316.
Milgram, N.A. (1987) The many faces of procrastination: Implications and re-
commendations for counselor. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED
290 103)
Missildine, H. (1963). Your inner child of past. New York: Simon and Shuster.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Academic procrastinators and perfectionistic ten-
dencies among graduate students [Special Issue]. Journal of Social Behavior
and Personality, 15 (5), 103-110.
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 383
Potts, T. J. (1987). Predicting procrastination on academic tasks with self-report
personality measures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University,
New York.
Powers, B. E. (1984). The effects of self-management program using productive
avoidance or premack principle as self-interventions on procrastination behavior.
Unpublished master’s thesis, United States International University, San Die-
go.
Richards, C. S. (1975). Behavior modification of studying through study skills
advice and self-control procedures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22, 431-
436.
Rothblum, E. D. (1990). Fear of failure: The psychodinamic, need achievement,
fear of success and procrastination models. Handbook of social and evulation an-
xiety. Newyork: Plenum Press.
Rothblum, E. D., Solomon, L. J., & Murakami, J. (1986). Affective, cognitive,
and behavioral differences between high and low procrastinators. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 33, 387-394
Saddler, C. D., & Sacks, L. A. (1993). Multidimensional perfectionism and aca-
demic procrastination: Relationships with depression in university students.
Psychological Reports, 73, 863-871.
Schouwenburg, H. C., & Lay, C. H. (1995). Trait procrastination and the big-
five factors of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 481-490.
Schubert Walker, L. J. (2004). Overcorning the powerlessness of procrastinati-
on. Canadian Journal of Guidance and Counselling. In H. C. Schouwenburg, C.
H. Lay , Timothy A. Pychyl, Joseph R. Ferrari, (Ed.), Counseling the procrasti-
nator in academic settings (pp. 75-89). Washington, DC: American Psychologi-
cal Association.
Senécal, C., Koestner, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (1995). Self-regulation and acade-
mic procrastination. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 607-619.
Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequ-
ency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31,
503-509.
Sommer, W. G. (1990). Procrastination and cramming: How adept students ace
the system. Journal of American College Health, 39, 5-10.
Strong, S. R., Wambach, C. A., Lopez, F. G., & Cooper, R. K. (1979). Motiva-
tional and equipping function of interpretation in counseling. Journal of Coun-
seling Psychology, 26, 98-109.
Tuckman, B. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procras-
tination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 473-480.
Van Nes, R. (1988). Eliminating procrastination without putting if off. Bloo-
mington, Indiana: Phi Delta Kapa Educational Foundation.
Vodanovich, S. J., & Seib, H. M. (1997). Relationship between time structure
and procrastination. Psychological Reports, 80, 211-215.
Watson, D. C. (2001). Procrastination and the five-factor model: A facet level
analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 149-158
384 • EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE
Wesley, J. C. (1994). Effects of ability, high school achievement, and procrasti-
natory behavior on college performance. Educational and Psychological Measu-
rement, 54, 404-408.
Yaakub, N. F. (2000). Procrastination among students in institutes of higher le-
arning: Challenges for k-economy. The School of Languages and Scientific
Thinking, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Retrieved May 10, 2005, from,
http://mahdzan.com/papers/procrastinate/.
Young, J. R. (1982) A Paradoxical treatment versus a behavioral approach in tre-
atment of procrastination of studying. Dissertation Abstracts International,
North Texas State University, Texas, USA
Ziesat, H. A., Rosenthal, T. L., & White, G. M. (1978). Behavioral self-control
in treating procrastination of studying. Psychological Reports, 42, 59-69
Zinger, D. J. (1983). Procrastination: To do or not to do? School Guidance Wor-
ker, 39, 9-15.
BALKIS, DURU / The Evaluation of the Major Characteristics and Aspects of the Procrastination... 385
... al., 2012). Balkis and Duru (2007) have identified five different categories of procrastination behaviour-life routine, decisional, compulsive, neurotic, and finally academic procrastination. Life routine procrastination is when the person is unable to schedule daily life activities and follow the routine as per schedule (Milgram et al., 1988). ...
... A few factors that are found to have a high influence on procrastination among students are perfectionism (Jadidi et al., 2011;Çapan, 2010), fear of failure (Flett et al., 1992;Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), and aversiveness to tasks Solomon & Rothblum, 1984). Also, there are a few psychosocial causes and correlates of procrastination, such as motivation for achievement (Munavara & Thomas, 2020), lack of time management skills (Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), boredom (Balkis & Duru, 2007;Sümer & Büttner, 2022), distractibility (Svartdal et al., 2020), thrill-seeking (Ferrari, 2000), and lack of organizational skills (Balkis & Duru, 2007). Psychological factors such as depression, high anxiety and low self efficacy (Balkis & Duru, 2007), impulsiveness (Steel & Ferrari, 2013), etc. also influence procrastination. ...
... A few factors that are found to have a high influence on procrastination among students are perfectionism (Jadidi et al., 2011;Çapan, 2010), fear of failure (Flett et al., 1992;Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), and aversiveness to tasks Solomon & Rothblum, 1984). Also, there are a few psychosocial causes and correlates of procrastination, such as motivation for achievement (Munavara & Thomas, 2020), lack of time management skills (Solomon & Rothblum, 1984), boredom (Balkis & Duru, 2007;Sümer & Büttner, 2022), distractibility (Svartdal et al., 2020), thrill-seeking (Ferrari, 2000), and lack of organizational skills (Balkis & Duru, 2007). Psychological factors such as depression, high anxiety and low self efficacy (Balkis & Duru, 2007), impulsiveness (Steel & Ferrari, 2013), etc. also influence procrastination. ...
Article
Full-text available
Academic procrastination is one of the main problems students encounter during studying. It affects their mental health, academic performance, and even everyday activities. A lack of time management was once thought to be the cause of procrastination. Procrastination, however, has been linked to mood control, according to recent studies. Decision-making is also a factor that is influenced by emotion or a person’s affect. The present study aims to find whether decision-making and affective styles influence academic procrastination among Indian students. The participants (N = 211) who are currently studying any discipline in a regular mode and who are between the ages of 17 to 30 years (mean = 21.10 & SD = 2.168) were selected using purposive sampling, and data was collected online using Academic Procrastination Scale, General Decision-Making Style Instrument and Affective Style Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation, along with multiple regression analysis. Results found a significant inverse correlation between rational decision-making and academic procrastination and a weak inverse correlation between adjusting affective style and academic procrastination. A significant positive correlation between avoidant decision-making and academic procrastination was also found. Through regression analysis avoidance, decision-making has been found as a positive predictor of academic procrastination along with rational decision-making, and spontaneous decision-making as negative predictors. No significant correlations were found for academic procrastination with intuitive, dependent, spontaneous, concealing, and tolerating styles. The current results contribute to the existing literature on academic procrastination and the development of effective strategies to reduce academic procrastination by managing unhealthy decision-making styles.
... Отже, за наявності структурованого-системного розподілу часу підвищуються продуктивність та спроможність долати перешкоди, підвищується резильєнтність. За високого рівня прокрастинації, навпаки, проявляються різноманітні труднощі, особливо за життєдіяльності в екстремальних умовах [11]. ...
... The relationship between psychological distress and problems that can increase procrastination, such as negative mood, insufficient attention to the future [62], lack of cognitive-emotional regulation, low flexibility [63], frustration intolerance [64], higher hopelessness, low flexibility, and anxiety, can explain the effect of psychological distress on procrastination. Moreover, high procrastinators may experience increasing psychological distress [65], suggesting the potential mutual relationship between procrastination and psychological distress, which can temper life satisfaction [15]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Procrastination is the deliberate, unjustified postponing of an intended course of action despite its costs or unfavorable effects. The present study used a self-report online survey and collected data from a large convenience sample of the general adult population (N = 2,076; females = 55.73%; Mage = 35.1 years [SD ± 12.7]) with diverse demographics. Following the ring-curve distribution, the results indicated a 15.4% prevalence rate of procrastination among the Iranian community, which was significantly higher among women and divorced individuals and lower among nomadic individuals and those with higher academic degrees. A latent profile analysis demonstrated two distinct profiles, one for procrastinators (high scores on chronic procrastination, psychological distress, neuroticism, and extraversion; and low scores on general self-efficacy, self-esteem, satisfaction with life, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness) and one for non-procrastinators (demonstrating a reverse pattern compared to procrastinators). Moreover, additional network analysis suggested that the examined networks were invariant across procrastination status and gender. The results indicate that procrastination differs by demographic characteristics and is associated with a unique psychological profile. However, none of the aforementioned key study variables were considered a potential vulnerability for procrastinators due to the finding that all variables were peripheral and none were central in the examined networks. Therefore, relying on the differences in mean scores on psychometric scales does not appear to be an optimal way of determining the most important variables in a therapeutic context when treating procrastination.
... Procrastination and procrastinatory behaviour are influenced by a multitude of factors. Previous studies on younger populations have identified psychological factors such as perfectionism, fear of failure, lack of motivation, individual differences, and maladaptive cognitive thinking as predictors of procrastination (Abbasi & Alghamdi, 2015;Balkis & Duru, 2007;Steel, 2007). Additionally, environmental factors such as task aversiveness, temporal delay, and lack of structure can also predict likelihood of procrastinatory behaviours (Klingsieck et al., 2013;Steel, 2007). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: Procrastination is an almost universal behaviour and yet little research to date has focused on procrastination among older adults. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential association between age and procrastination, and the potential mediating roles of depressive symptom-atology and loneliness. Method: Structural equation modelling was applied to data from 1309 participants (aged 29-92) from two waves United States Health and Retirement Study (2016-2020). Within the model, sex, education, marital status, and job status were added as covariates. Results: There was no statistically significant direct effect between age and procrastination (β = 0.06, p = 0.106). However, an indirect effect was present via depressive symptomatology (β = −0.40, p < 0.001). No mediating effect of loneliness was observed (β = − 0.01, p = 0.371). Subsequent analysis revealed that the symptoms, fatigue, loneliness, and lack of motivation significantly predicted procrastination. Conclusion: While age was not directly associated with procrastination, increasing age was associated with a decreased likelihood of depressive symptomatology, which was in turn associated with an increased likelihood of procrastination. Such findings indicates that age demonstrates no association with procrastination because of the suppressing effect of depressive symptomatology.
... La procrastinación irracional supone costes de tiempo y dinero importantes, se han estimado pérdidas millonarias (7,(12)(13) . Asimismo, también tiene importantes efectos en el área de salud (14)(15) en el bienestar subjetivo (16-17) y el rendimiento académico (18) , entre otros. ...
Article
Full-text available
Various studies have reported positive relationships between Irrational Procrastination (IP) and impulsivity, a trait that could be considered susceptible to immediate reinforcement. The theory of susceptibility to reinforcement and punishment proposed by Gray has been reviewed, and subcategories have been suggested, such as susceptibility to immediate and delayed reinforcement, as well as susceptibility to immediate and anticipated punishment, variables that have only been studied in relation to IP on a single occasion. OBJECTIVE. To study the relationship between IP and Susceptibility to Immediate and Delayed Reinforcement, and susceptibility to Anticipated Punishment. METHODOLOGY: The Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS), the Susceptibility to Anticipated Punishment Scale (SAPS), and the Susceptibility to Immediate and Delayed Reinforcement Scale (SIDR) were administered to a sample of 960 university students. RESULTS. The regression model highlighted that the three factors of the two scales were significant and predicted irrational procrastination, explaining 23% of the variance. CONCLUSION. Those factors that clearly allude to susceptibility to delayed reinforcement or anticipated punishment are negatively related to procrastination. On the other hand, when the susceptibility to reinforcement or punishment is short term, the relationship is positive.
... Causes of academic procrastination according to Balkis and Duru [7] and Bojuwoye [8] Comprise: ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: In Anambra State where there are two public universities that have postgraduate schools, postgraduate students have been observed procrastinating by the nature of their activities. This led to examining the relationship between gender and academic procrastination amongst postgraduate students in Anambra State in this study. Methods: A research question and a hypothesis guided the study. The study adopted a correlational research design and was carried out at Nnamdi Azikiwe University and Chukwuemeka Odimegwu Ojukwu, Igboariam, both in Anambra State. The study population consists of 1,862 students, comprising all Masters and Doctorate students of the 2017/2018 academic session. The number of 2017/2018 postgraduate students in Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka are 1,088 while those in Chukwuemeka Odimegwu Ojukwu Igbariam is 774. Purposive sampling technique was used to select the sample, which comprises 329 postgraduate students. The instrument for data collection was Academic Procrastination Scale (APS). The instrument was an adopted instrument. McCloskey originally developed the 25-item APS in 2011. The research question was answered using mean and standard deviation, while the hypothesis was tested, using z-test. Results: Findings indicated that there is no meaningful relationship between male and female academic procrastination of postgraduate students. Conclusion: It was concluded that male and female postgraduate students procrastinate in their academic endeavours.
Article
Bu araştırmada üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik erteleme davranışları cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi, sosyo-ekonomik düzey, internet kullanım süresi, sosyal medyayı kullanma amacı ve beş faktör kişilik özellikleri açısından incelenmiştir. Bu araştırma ilişkisel tarama yöntemi ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırma verileri 2023-2024 yılında toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu % 73.9’u kadın (303 kişi) ve % 26.1’i erkek (107 kişi) olmak üzere 410 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma verileri kişisel bilgi formu, Akademik Erteleme Ölçeği-Kısa form, Beş Faktör Kişilik Ölçeği kullanılarak elde edilmiştir. Veriler çevirimiçi yolla toplanmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek için Pearson Korelasyon Katsayısı ve Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon Analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda akademik erteleme davranışlarının cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi ve sosyo-ekonomik düzeye göre farklılık göstermediği; internet kullanım süresi ve sosyal medyayı kullanım amacına göre farklılık gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Akademik erteleme ile beş faktör kişilik özellikleri arasında bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Dışandönüklük, yumuşakbaşlılık, özdisiplin ile akademik erteleme arasında negatif yönde, düşük ve anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi sonucunda beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin akademik ertelemenin %21’ini açıkladığı ortaya çıkmıştır.
Article
Full-text available
Bu araştırma, 2023 yılında Diyarbakır ilinde yaşları 12-18 arasında değişen, 170’i erkek ve 245’i kız olmak üzere 415 ergenin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı; ergenlik dönemindeki bireylerde dijital oyun bağımlılığının akademik erteleme davranışını anlamlı olarak etkileyip etkilemediğinin incelenmesidir. OBÖ (Oyun Bağımlılığı Ölçeği) ve AEÖ (Akademik Erteleme Ölçeği) kullanılarak cinsiyet, gelir durumu, günlük dijital oyun oynama süresi, anne ve babanın eğitim durumları, evde sabit internet olma durumu ve yaş değişkenlerine ilişkin analizler yapılmıştır. Araştırma verilerin analizi IBM SPSS Statistics 27 programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. İkili grupların karşılaştırılmasında T-testi ve ikiden fazla olan grupların karşılaştırılmalarında One-Way Anova ve Cronbach Alpha güvenirlik analizi uygulanmıştır. OBÖ ve AEÖ ile yapılan normallik testinin literatürde belirtilen sınırlar içerisinde olduğu saptanmıştır. Erkeklerin oyun bağımlılığı ortalama puanlarının kızlardan daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiş. Gelir durumu ve evde sabit internet olma durumu değişkenlerine göre incelendiğinde OBÖ için anlamlı farklılık görülmüş, AEÖ için anlamlı farklılık tespit edilememiştir. Günlük dijital oyunları oynamaya bağlı olarak incelendiğinde, oyun bağımlılığı ve akademik erteleme ölçeklerinde anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Anne ve baba eğitim seviyesi değişkenlerine göre incelendiğinde OBÖ ve AEÖ için aralarında anlamlı farklılık tespit edilememiştir. Yaş ile OBÖ arasında negatif yönde düşük düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki, AEÖ ile pozitif yönde düşük düzeyde anlamlı ilişki tespit saptanmıştır.
Article
Full-text available
The present study aimed to determine a relationship between personality traits and procrastination among the undergraduates and to compare mean scores of both the genders and academic years on Academic Procrastination Scale and Big Five Inventory. Through random sampling a sample of 250 undergraduatestudents (M= 21, SD = 1.47) was selected from a private university in Lahore, Pakistan. For measuring personality traits Big Five Inventory (BFI) was used and Academic Procrastination Scale (APS) was used to measure procrastination. Pearson Product Moment correlation depicted that out of the Big Five personality traits only neuroticismshares a positive correlation with procrastination. Furthermore, through descriptive statistics mean scores of both the genders and academic years on personality and procrastination scale were found to be insignificant; senior year female studentsscoring slightly low on procrastination as compared to males and other academic year students. This study would help researchers to explore this area on a large population taken from multiple institutions belonging to different gender and backgrounds.
Article
Full-text available
In Sample 1, 46 procrastinators compared with 52 nonprocrastinators claimed lower self-esteem, greater public self-consciousness and social anxiety, and a stronger tendency toward self-handicapping. In Sample 2, 48 procrastinators compared with 54 nonprocrastinators reported a weaker tendency toward seeking self-identity information but a stronger tendency toward a diffuse-identity style, yet there were no significant differences in verbal and abstract thinking abilities. Further research must provide evidence for persistent procrastination as a personality disorder that includes anxiety, avoidance, and a fear of evaluation of ability.
Article
Full-text available
Investigated the frequency of 342 college students' procrastination on academic tasks and the reasons for procrastination behavior. A high percentage of Ss reported problems with procrastination on several specific academic tasks. Self-reported procrastination was positively correlated with the number of self-paced quizzes Ss took late in the semester and with participation in an experimental session offered late in the semester. A factor analysis of the reasons for procrastination Ss listed in a procrastination assessment scale indicated that the factors Fear of Failure and Aversiveness of the Task accounted for most of the variance. A small but very homogeneous group of Ss endorsed items on the Fear of Failure factor that correlated significantly with self-report measures of depression, irrational cognitions, low self-esteem, delayed study behavior, anxiety, and lack of assertion. A larger and relatively heterogeneous group of Ss reported procrastinating as a result of aversiveness of the task. The Aversiveness of the Task factor correlated significantly with depression, irrational cognitions, low self-esteem, and delayed study behavior. Results indicate that procrastination is not solely a deficit in study habits or time management, but involves a complex interaction of behavioral, cognitive, and affective components. (16 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Book
Procrastination means putting off a difficult, delayable, important task in favor of something easier, quicker, and less anxiety-provoking. It also means delaying vital actions until the performance and result are less than they would have been if done in a timely manner. Similarly, blocking means that we stumble, delay, and panic in response to a demanding responsibility. Blocking typically occurs when we face public scrutiny (as in writing). In this revisionist and sometimes irreverent book, the author takes academic and professional psychologists to task for neglecting a pair of related problems that are often derided but that can be profoundly debilitating for individuals and economically devastating for schools, businesses, and communities.
Article
Research has documented that most college students delay on academic tasks. Surprisingly, graduate students may procrastinate on academic tasks even more than do undergraduate students. Perfectionism also has been found to be high among graduate students. It is likely that for graduate students, delaying academic tasks such as writing a term paper is indicative of perfectionism. Thus, this study investigated the relationship between academic procrastination and perfectionism among 135 graduate students, who were administered the Procrastination Assessment Scale-Students and the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. A canonical correlation analysis revealed that fear of failure, a component of academic procrastination was related to self-oriented perfectionism and socially prescribed perfectionism. Other-oriented perfectionism, the third dimension of perfectionism, acted as a suppressor variable. Implications are discussed.