Twenty questions in genetic medicine—An assessment of World Wide Web databases for genetics information at the point of care

Division of General Internal Medicine and McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21093, USA.
Genetics in medicine: official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics (Impact Factor: 7.33). 10/2008; 10(9):659-67. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318180639d
Source: PubMed


The aim of this article was to determine the accuracy and efficiency of World Wide Web ("Web") resources to help nongeneticists answer four clinical questions about each of five common genetic conditions.
Correct answers were established by literature review. Two open-access genetics resources and seven general subscription resources were reviewed. Scoring criteria were established to define complete, partial, vague, inconsistent, not found, and wrong answers. The main outcome measures were number of answers found, accuracy, and completeness of answers. Efficiency (time per answer found) was a secondary measure.
Overall, the databases contained complete answers 33.3% of the time but contained no information as frequently (33.9%). The best database had complete answers 70% of the time, whereas the worst contained no complete answers. Five of the seven subscription databases had a total of eight wrong answers. The other two subscription databases and the two open-access genetics databases had no wrong answers. Search time ranged from 3.2 to 18.3 minutes per complete answer.
Nongeneticist providers do not have a Web resource that is accessible, accurate, and efficient to answer genetic questions that might arise in practice.

Download full-text


Available from: Diane Seibert, Nov 09, 2015
  • Source
    • "The advantage of the latter is that they are usually initiated and administered by experts in the field and, as such, tend to contain more data and more reliable data. The potential disadvantages of both types of databases, however, are that--due to their specialist nature--they may not be amenable to simple search techniques for data mining or use by non-geneticists [6]. In order for a wide range of health practitioners easily to access all information pertaining to a particular mutation, it would be highly desirable to be able quickly to interrogate a central web-based resource using simple, uncomplicated terms [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DNA mutation data currently reside in many online databases, which differ markedly in the terminology used to describe or define the mutation and also in completeness of content, potentially making it difficult both to locate a mutation of interest and to find sought-after data (eg phenotypic effect). To highlight the current deficiencies in the accessibility of web-based genetic variation information, we examined the ease with which various resources could be interrogated for five model mutations, using a set of simple search terms relating to the change in amino acid or nucleotide. Fifteen databases were investigated for the time and/or number of mouse clicks; clicks required to find the mutations; availability of phenotype data; the procedure for finding information; and site layout. Google and PubMed were also examined. The three locus-specific databases (LSDBs) generally yielded positive outcomes, but the 12 genome-wide databases gave poorer results, with most proving not to be searchable and only three yielding successful outcomes. Google and PubMed searches found some mutations and provided patchy information on phenotype. The results show that many web-based resources are not currently configured for fast and easy access to comprehensive mutation data, with only the isolated LSDBs providing optimal outcomes. Centralising this information within a common repository, coupled with a simple, all-inclusive interrogation process, would improve searching for all gene variation data.
    Preview · Article · Mar 2011 · Human genomics
  • Source
    • "This is not surprising as their professional training prepares counselors with expertise in translating complex information for the public, patients and health professionals. Although numerous genetics resources exist, few focus on genomic risk information (Levy et al. 2008). Genetic counseling educational efforts might enable increased access to genome-guided care through the provision of foundational genetics/genomics knowledge and a connection to accurate information about genomic risk information, available tests and published guidelines for the public and health professionals. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the major anticipated benefits of genomic medicine is the area of preventive medicine. Commercially available genomic profiling is now able to generate risk information for a number of common conditions several of which have recognized preventive guidelines. Similarly, family history assessment affords powerful health risk prediction based on the shared genetic, physical and lifestyle environments within families. Thus, with the ability to help predict disease risk and enable preemptive health plans, genome-guided preventive medicine has the potential to improve population health on an individualized level. To realize this potential, steps to broaden access to accurate genomic health information must be considered. With expertise in genetic science, risk assessment and communication, and a patient-centered practice approach, genetic counselors are poised to play a critical role in facilitating the incorporation of genomic health risks into the burgeoning field of genome-guided preventive medicine.
    Full-text · Article · May 2010 · Journal of Genetic Counseling
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: If the dream of personalized medicine is to be realized, tremendous amounts of data specific to each individual must be captured, synthesized and presented to clinicians at the time this information is needed to make care decisions for the patient. This can only be accomplished through the use of sophisticated electronic medical record (EMR) systems that are designed to support this function. This article will define two important aspects of a fully functional EMR the ability to: present patients or clinicians with high quality context specific information at the point of care (so-called "just-in time" education) and to combine clinically relevant information from disparate sources in order to guide the clinician to the optimized intervention for a given patient (clinical decision support). Personalized medicine examples are used to illustrate these concepts. As implemented most EMR systems are not being used to assimilate the information needed to provide personalized medicine. A description of necessary enhancements to currently available systems that will be needed to create a "personalized medicine enabled" EMR is provided.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2011 · Human Genetics
Show more