A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Psychological Bulletin
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
A Meta-Analysis of 25 Years of Mood–Creativity Research:
Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus?
Matthijs Baas, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, and Bernard A. Nijstad
University of Amsterdam
This meta-analysis synthesized 102 effect sizes reflecting the relation between specific moods and
creativity. Effect sizes overall revealed that positive moods produce more creativity than mood-neutral
controls (r⫽.15), but no significant differences between negative moods and mood-neutral controls
(r⫽⫺.03) or between positive and negative moods (r⫽.04) were observed. Creativity is enhanced most
by positive mood states that are activating and associated with an approach motivation and promotion
focus (e.g., happiness), rather than those that are deactivating and associated with an avoidance
motivation and prevention focus (e.g., relaxed). Negative, deactivating moods with an approach moti-
vation and a promotion focus (e.g., sadness) were not associated with creativity, but negative, activating
moods with an avoidance motivation and a prevention focus (fear, anxiety) were associated with lower
creativity, especially when assessed as cognitive flexibility. With a few exceptions, these results
generalized across experimental and correlational designs, populations (students vs. general adult
population), and facet of creativity (e.g., fluency, flexibility, originality, eureka/insight). The authors
discuss theoretical implications and highlight avenues for future research on specific moods, creativity,
and their relationships.
Keywords: mood, creativity, regulatory focus, hedonic tone, level of activation
Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012815.supp
“The artist is a receptacle for emotions that come from all over the
place: from the sky, from the earth, from a scrap of paper, from a
passing shape, from a spider’s web.”
—Picasso, quoted in Christian Zervos, Conversation avec Picasso
[Conversation with Picasso]
“Feeling and longing are the motive forces behind all human endeavor
and human creations.”
—Albert Einstein, Religion and Science
To survive, people need to adapt to changing circumstances. To
prosper, people need to solve problems, generate new insights, and
create new products and services. Put differently, critical to both
survival and prosperity is creativity—the creation of something
new and unusual meant to improve one’s effective functioning
(Amabile, 1983; Eysenck, 1993; Runco, 2004; Simonton, 2003).
Accordingly, creativity has been studied in the psychological sci-
ences for decades, most notably since Guilford’s (1950) address to
the American Psychological Association, in which he pleaded for
the systematic study of creativity within psychology. Creativity
research now has its own place within most of the traditional
sub-areas in psychology, including social, organizational, person-
ality, cognitive, clinical, and child psychology.
Within these different sub-areas, mood stands out as one of the
most widely studied and least disputed predictors of creativity
(e.g., Isen & Baron, 1991; Mumford, 2003). The popularity of
mood as a predictor of creativity is partly due to the fact that mood
often serves as an intermediary state between a host of situational
and personality predictors, on the one hand, and creative perfor-
mance, on the other. Thus, once we understand how mood relates
to creativity, we may infer from the ways in which leadership
influences employee mood how leadership relates to employee
creativity (e.g., George & Zhou, 2002). Likewise, from the ways in
which group conflict influences individual moods, we may infer
how conflict relates to group creativity (e.g., Carnevale & Probst,
1998; De Dreu & Nijstad, in press). Additionally, from the way
preliminary task performance shapes emotion states, we may infer
how such task performance relates to creative performance on a
subsequent task (e.g., Madjar & Oldham, 2002).
In general, the mood– creativity literature breaks down into three
separate, yet interrelated, lines of inquiry. First, there is a large amount
of work comparing positive moods with affect-neutral control condi-
tions. In summarizing this line of work, Ashby, Isen, and Turken
(1999) concluded “It is now well recognized that positive affect leads
to greater cognitive flexibility and facilitates creative problem solving
across a broad range of settings” (p. 530). In a similar vein, Lyubomir-
sky, King, and Diener (2005) stated,
People in a positive mood are more likely to have richer associations
within existing knowledge structures, and thus are likely to be more
flexible and original. Those in a good mood will excel when the task
is complex and past learning can be used in a heuristic way to more
efficiently solve the task or when creativity and flexibility are re-
quired. (p. 840)
Matthijs Baas, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, and Bernard A. Nijstad, Department
of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Matthijs
Baas, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat
15, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail: m.baas@uva.nl
Psychological Bulletin Copyright 2008 by the American Psychological Association
2008, Vol. 134, No. 6, 779– 806 0033-2909/08/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0012815
779
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.