Penetrating Neck Trauma: A Review of Management Strategies and Discussion of the 'No Zone' Approach
Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. The American surgeon
(Impact Factor: 0.82).
The evaluation and management of hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating neck injury has evolved considerably over the previous four decades. Algorithms developed in the 1970s focused on anatomic neck "zones" to distinguish triage pathways resulting from the operative constraints associated with very high or very low penetrations. During that era, mandatory endoscopy and angiography for Zone I and III penetrations, or mandatory neck exploration for Zone II injuries, became popularized, the so-called "selective approach." Currently, modern sensitive imaging technology, including computed tomographic angiography (CTA), is widely available. Imaging triage can now accomplish what operative or selective evaluation could not: a safe and noninvasive evaluation of critical neck structures to identify or exclude injury based on trajectory, the key to penetrating injury management. In this review, we discuss the use of CTA in modern screening algorithms introducing a "No Zone" paradigm: an evidence-based method eliminating "neck zone" differentiation during triage and management. We conclude that a comprehensive physical examination, combined with CTA, is adequate for triage to effectively identify or exclude vascular and aerodigestive injury after penetrating neck trauma. Zone-based algorithms lead to an increased reliance on invasive diagnostic modalities (endoscopy and angiography) with their associated risks and to a higher incidence of nontherapeutic neck exploration. Therefore, surgeons evaluating hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating neck injuries should consider departing from antiquated, invasive algorithms in favor of evidence-based screening strategies that use physical examination and CTA.
Available from: Supparerk Prichayudh
- "Therefore, recent studies have given more emphasis to the patients' signs and symptoms, rather than the neck zones per se, to dictate further investigation and management   . This socalled ''no zone'' approach, using physical examination and computed tomographic angiography (CTA), has greatly simplified the management of PNIs with negligible missed injuries and low negative exploration rates (1–2%)   . The purpose of the present study is to identify the outcomes of selective management of PNIs, using the ''no zone'' approach, in terms of negative exploration rate, missed injury rate, and mortality. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Selective management has been the standard management protocol in penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) since this approach has significantly reduced unnecessary neck exploration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of selective management in PNIs using the "no zone" approach, in which the management is guided mainly by clinical signs and symptoms, not the location of the neck wounds.
A retrospective study was performed in patients treated for PNIs at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) from January 2003 to December 2013. The patients with hard signs of neck injury (i.e., active bleeding, significant haematoma, massive subcutaneous emphysema, and air bubbling through the neck wound) underwent emergency neck exploration. The asymptomatic patients and the patients with soft signs (other symptoms) were considered to be candidates for selective management. Data collection included demographic data, emergency department parameters, details of neck injury, and outcomes in terms of mortality, negative exploration rate, and missed injury rate.
Eighty-six PNI patients were treated at KCMH from 2003 to 2013, 64 of which sustained stab wounds, 12 gunshot wounds, 4 shotgun wounds, and 6 other causes. Thirty-six patients presenting with hard signs underwent immediate neck exploration and there were 2 negative explorations. Twenty-six patients with soft signs underwent selective investigations (including computed tomographic angiography in 21 patients), 5 patients required neck explorations due to positive results of the investigations with one negative exploration. All of the twenty-four asymptomatic patients were managed with close observation, none required subsequent neck exploration. There was no missed injury found in the present study. Successful non-operative management was carried out in 45 patients (52%). The overall negative exploration rate was 7% (3 in 41 patients undergoing neck exploration). Two patients with hard signs died from associated chest injuries (mortality rate 2%).
Selective management of penetrating neck injuries based on physical examination and selective use of investigations (no zone approach) is safe and simple with low negative exploration rate and no missed injury.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article reviews the current standard of care in imaging considerations for the diagnosis and management of craniomaxillofacial trauma. Injury-specific imaging techniques and options for computer-aided surgery as related to craniomaxillofacial trauma are reviewed, including preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and intraoperative computed tomography. Specific imaging considerations by anatomic region include frontal sinus fractures, temporal bone fractures, midfacial fractures, mandible fractures, laryngotracheal injuries, and vascular injuries. Imaging considerations in the pediatric trauma patient are also discussed. Responsible postoperative imaging as it relates to facial trauma management and outcomes assessment is reviewed.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Penetrating trauma to the neck, laryngeal fracture and foreign-body aspiration are three injuries that, individually, infrequently occur in adults. Reports of penetrating neck injuries and foreign-body aspiration presenting simultaneously, have been described in the literature. The authors present the previously unreported case of a penetrating gunshot wound to the pharynx with resulting laryngeal fracture followed by aspiration of the bullet in an adult patient. In this case, appropriate treatment of the neck injuries must be prioritized along with locating and removing the aspirated foreign body.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.