Article

Human Adaptations for the Visual Assessment of Strength and Fighting Ability from the Body and Face

Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (Impact Factor: 5.05). 11/2008; 276(1656):575-84. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1177
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Selection in species with aggressive social interactions favours the evolution of cognitive mechanisms for assessing physical formidability (fighting ability or resource-holding potential). The ability to accurately assess formidability in conspecifics has been documented in a number of non-human species, but has not been demonstrated in humans. Here, we report tests supporting the hypothesis that the human cognitive architecture includes mechanisms that assess fighting ability-mechanisms that focus on correlates of upper-body strength. Across diverse samples of targets that included US college students, Bolivian horticulturalists and Andean pastoralists, subjects in the US were able to accurately estimate the physical strength of male targets from photos of their bodies and faces. Hierarchical linear modelling shows that subjects were extracting cues of strength that were largely independent of height, weight and age, and that corresponded most strongly to objective measures of upper-body strength-even when the face was all that was available for inspection. Estimates of women's strength were less accurate, but still significant. These studies are the first empirical demonstration that, for humans, judgements of strength and judgements of fighting ability not only track each other, but accurately track actual upper-body strength.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michael Gurven
  • Source
    • "From the perspective of the natural selection and parental investment theories (Trivers, 1982), these skills are assumed to be associated with the good genes of the males and with the signaling of the best opportunities for the resources necessary for the care of offspring. In this context, some authors (Sell et al., 2009) argue that women have evolved skills for assessing the "formidability" in men (i.e. fighting ability and potential to own and defend valuable resources). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paper addresses the psychological evaluation in terms of the interaction between convict (female) – psychologist (male), targeting the analysis of the non-verbal behavior or seductive behavior displayed by the convict. The article analyzes the elements of non-verbal behavior that might provide information on the emotional state of the detainee, types of posture, facial micro-expressions and indicators of seductive behavior. By providing case analysis on the identification and decryption of messages at non-verbal level, one might optimize the quality of psychological assessment, help build pragmatic and therapeutic recommendations and provide clarity on the character of the detainees.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2015 · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • Source
    • "From the perspective of evolutionary psychology, angry facial expression was consist of raising the upper lip and lowering the brow, the pattern of muscle activity will naturally make the facial width to height ratio increases (Carré and McCormick, 2008) [6]. At times of resource competition, it is critical to identify negative emotions quickly to ensure their survival and reproduction (Sell, et al., 2009) [39]. So we may conclude that cultivating the sensitivity to fWHR is to avoid physical attacks and gain resource in the evolution of mankind. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Facial-width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is a kind of facial feature that based on the overall facial information and can be specifically measured. fWHR is closely related to the individual aggressive. The present study reviewed previous researches on aggression and measurement of fWHR, and described the relationship between fWHR and aggression under the external and internal factors. Moreover, the researchers explained them from the perspective of cognition, physics and evolutionary. In the future, the studies can deepen these fields to enrich the theories and effectively prevent and control violence in society.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015 · Open Journal of Social Sciences
  • Source
    • "These seemingly incompatible uses have recently been suggested to be the result of specialization of the hominin hand for both manual dexterity and punching (Morgan and Carrier, 2013). The hypothesis that the proportions of the hominin hand are, in part, the result of selection acting on fighting behavior is controversial (King, 2013; Nickle and Goncharoff, 2013) and has implications for the role that male–male physical competition has played in the evolution of the hominin lineage (Daly and Wilson, 1988, 1999a,b; Wrangham and Peterson, 1996; Puts, 2010; Puts et al., 2012; Sell et al., 2009, 2012; Carrier, 2011; Morgan and Carrier, 2013; Carrier and Morgan, 2015). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The hands of hominins (i.e. bipedal apes) are distinguished by skeletal proportions that are known to enhance manual dexterity but also allow the formation of a clenched fist. Because male-male physical competition is important in the mating systems of most species of great apes, including humans, we tested the hypothesis that a clenched fist protects the metacarpal bones from injury by reducing the level of strain during striking. We used cadaver arms to measure in vitro strain in metacarpals during forward strikes with buttressed and unbuttressed fist postures and during side slaps with an open palm. If the protective buttressing hypothesis is correct, the clenched fist posture should substantially reduce strain in the metacarpal bones during striking and therefore reduce the risk of fracture. Recorded strains were significantly higher in strikes in which the hand was secured in unbuttressed and slapping postures than in the fully buttressed posture. Our results suggest that humans can safely strike with 55% more force with a fully buttressed fist than with an unbuttressed fist and with twofold more force with a buttressed fist than with an open-hand slap. Thus, the evolutionary significance of the proportions of the hominin hand may be that these are the proportions that improved manual dexterity while at the same time making it possible for the hand to be used as a club during fighting.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015 · Journal of Experimental Biology
Show more