Article

The genetic and environmental etiology of decision-making: A longitudinal twin study

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, 3620 S. McClintock Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA. Electronic address: .
Journal of Adolescence (Impact Factor: 2.05). 12/2012; 36(2). DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.10.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

The present study examined the genetic and environmental etiology of decision-making (Iowa Gambling Task; Bechara, Damásio, Damásio, & Anderson, 1994), in a sample of twins at ages 11-13, 14-15, and 16-18 years. The variance across five 20-trial blocks could be explained by a latent "decision-making'' factor within each of the three times of IGT administration. This latent factor was modestly influenced by genetic factors, explaining 35%, 20% and 46% of the variance within each of the three times of IGT administration. The remaining variance was explained by the non-shared environment (65%, 80% and 54%, respectively). Block-specific non-shared environmental influences were also observed. The stability of decision-making was modest across development. Youth showed a trend to choose less risky decks at later ages, suggesting some improvement in task performance across development. These findings contribute to our understanding of decision-making by highlighting the particular importance of each person's unique experiences on individual differences.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Laura A Baker
  • Source
    • "Therefore, our ability to detect some differences between relatively small groups of healthy participants strongly supports the hypothesis that decision-making may be particularly heritable in families of suicide completers. Previous studies in different patient populations, including bipolar disorder, alcoholism, anorexia and obsessive-compulsive disorder, have also reported heritability of IGT performance (Lovallo et al., 2006; Cavedini et al., 2010; Kulkarni et al., 2010; Galimberti et al., 2013; Tuvblad et al., 2013). To date, the present study is the first to suggest heritability in decision-making impairment in families of suicide completers, adding important findings to the literature on transmissible cognitive impairments and underlining the significant role of risky decision-making in the vulnerability to suicidal behaviour. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The heritability of suicide is well established. Transmission of risk appears to follow traits more than disorders like depression. In the present project, we aimed at investigating the potential for transmission of cognitive deficits previously observed in suicide attempters, specifically impaired decision-making and cognitive control. Seventeen healthy first-degree relatives of suicide completers with no personal history of suicidal act were compared to 18 first-degree relatives of individuals with major depressive disorder but no family history of suicidal act, and 19 healthy controls. Decision-making was assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task, and cognitive control with the Stroop Task, the Hayling Sentence Completion Test, and the Trail-Making Test. Both suicide and depressed relatives showed lower gambling task net scores than healthy controls. However, there were trends toward lower learning abilities in suicide than depressed relatives (interaction: p = 0.07), with more risky choices at the end of the test. Suicide relatives also showed a higher number of self-corrected errors relative to the total number of errors in the Stroop colour test compared to both control groups, with no difference in interference scores. There was no group-difference for any other cognitive tests. Our findings suggest that decision-making impairment may be found in healthy relatives of suicides and represent a cognitive endophenotype of suicidal behaviour. Normal cognitive control (or self-corrected deficits) may protect relatives against suicidal acts. Impairments in value-based and control processes may, therefore, be part of the suicide vulnerability and represent potential targets of preventative interventions. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015 · Journal of Psychiatric Research
    • "Therefore, our ability to detect some differences between relatively small groups of healthy participants strongly supports the hypothesis that decision-making may be particularly heritable in families of suicide completers. Previous studies in different patient populations, including bipolar disorder, alcoholism, anorexia and obsessive-compulsive disorder, have also reported heritability of IGT performance (Lovallo et al., 2006; Cavedini et al., 2010; Kulkarni et al., 2010; Galimberti et al., 2013; Tuvblad et al., 2013). To date, the present study is the first to suggest heritability in decision-making impairment in families of suicide completers, adding important findings to the literature on transmissible cognitive impairments and underlining the significant role of risky decision-making in the vulnerability to suicidal behaviour. "

    No preview · Conference Paper · Mar 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Criminal behaviour and violence are increasingly viewed as worldwide public health problems. A growing body of knowledge shows that criminal behaviour has a neurobiological basis, and this has intensified judicial interest in the potential application of neuroscience to criminal law. It also gives rise to important questions. What are the implications of such application for predicting future criminal behaviour and protecting society? Can it be used to prevent violence? And what are the implications for the way offenders are punished?
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013 · Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Show more