ChapterPDF Available

Current Special Education Programs in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Special education services in Jordan have been a major concern in the country since the 1960s. Special education programs subsequently have evolved gradually to follow any new trends in the profession and the emergent needs in Jordan. Despite the challenges presented in the country, educators and policymakers are jointly developing and following up programs to better serve the Jordanian people with disabilities. The current special education programs in Jordan are implemented practically and supported by research. Different authorities have taken the lead to organize, monitor, and improve these programs. Challenges could be overcome through joint efforts to introduce comprehensive and effective special education programs.
Content may be subject to copyright.
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
Advances in Research and Praxis in Special Education in Africa, Caribbean, and the Middle East, pages 193–206
Copyright © 2012 by Information Age Publishing
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 193
CHAPTER 11
CURRENT SPECIAL
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
IN THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM
OF JORDAN
Mohammad AL Jabery
Jamal AL Khateeb
The University of Jordan
Marshall Zumberg
Wayne State University
ABSTRACT
Special education services in Jordan have been a major concern in the coun-
try since the 1960s. Special education programs subsequently have evolved
gradually to follow any new trends in the profession and the emergent needs
in Jordan. Despite the challenges presented in the country, educators and
policymakers are jointly developing and following up programs to better
serve the Jordanian people with disabilities. The current special education
programs in Jordan are implemented practically and supported by research.
Dierent authorities have taken the lead to organize, monitor, and improve
these programs. Challenges could be overcome through joint eorts to intro-
duce comprehensive and eective special education programs.
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
194 M. AL JABERY, J. AL KHATEEB, and M. ZUMBERG
INTRODUCTION
An overview of current special education programs in the Hashemite King-
dom of Jordan (HKJ) is presented here. This chapter specifically provides
background information about Jordan, an overview of the educational sys-
tems (regular and special education) in Jordan, a discussion of the evolu-
tion of special education services and programs, and a discussion of the
main features of these programs. A description and examination of current
special education research venues and practices is provided, as well as an
identification of the challenges that might hinder or impact the prepara-
tion and introduction of these programs in the HKJ.
JORDAN: THE COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE
Jordan is a small, developing Arab country with limited resources. It is the
home of some of the earliest human settlements. Jordan is approximately
60,000 square miles in area and is located in the heart of the Middle East,
northwest of Saudi Arabia, south of Syria, southwest of Iraq, and east of Israel
and the Occupied West Bank. Jordan has access to the Red Sea via the port
city of Aqaba, which is located at the northern end of the Gulf of Aqaba.
The population of Jordan was estimated in 2004 to be approximately 5.7
million, composed of 2.9 million males and 2.7 million females (Depart-
ment of Statistics [DOS], 2007). Approximately 93 % of Jordan’s popula-
tion is Muslim and 7% is Christian. Due to limited natural resources, the
per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in 2004 was approximately $2,054
million (US) and the unemployment rate was estimated at 15%. Jordan’s
economy and development have suered a lot from external shocks and
regional unrest. It is classified by the World Bank as a lower middle income
country. Adult literacy is estimated at 91.3% (male: 95.9%, female: 86.3%)
making the literacy rate in Jordan among the highest in Arab countries.
Measures of social well-being and health status also are high compared to
other countries with similar incomes.
STRUCTURE OF THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS IN JORDAN
Schools in Jordan are mainly directed and supervised by the Ministry of
Education (MoE). The total number of schools in Jordan recently was es-
timated to be 5,690 with a total of 1,598,211 students and 89,512 teachers
(see Table 11.1) (Ministry of Education [MoE], 2008).
General education in Jordan contains three cycles: kindergarten, basic
(first through tenth grades), and secondary (grades 11 and 12). By the end
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
Current Special Education Programs in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 195
of the basic cycle, students are required to choose which stream they prefer
to pursue in their secondary school education: the academic stream (scien-
tific, literary, information, health education, and religious studies) or the
applied (vocational) stream (MoE, 2008).
Based on student preferences as well as the sum of their grade point
averages (GPAs) in the eighth, ninth, and tenth grades, students choose
among the dierent streams as they enter secondary school (MoE, 2004).
The six dierent streams prepare students either to continue their higher
education in a university or community college or to acquire required skills
for employment through the joint participation of MoE and the Vocational
Training Corporation (MoE, 2004).
Over the past two decades, the Jordanian Ministry of Education has been
actively working to actualize educational reform and to change its educa-
tional policies and practices. A number of major reforms in school cur-
ricula and teacher preparation programs have been introduced. National
standards for teacher education in Jordan currently are being developed.
Jordan also actively attempts to achieve the goals of Education for All,
which urges governments to meet the educational needs of all students and
to adopt the principles of inclusive education.
PREVALENCE OF DISABILITY IN JORDAN
It is dicult to estimate the numbers of children with disabilities, or the
percentages of children in each of the disability categories, since there is
no central data collection agency. Several additional factors make estimat-
ing prevalence rates extremely dicult. These factors include, but are not
limited to, lack of formal definitions, societal attitudes, lack of qualified
TABLE 11.1 Distribution of Schools, Students, and Teachers
by Controlling Authority in Jordan
Authority
Category MoE
Other
Government UNRWA
Private
Sector Total
Schools 3,270 53 177 2,190 5,690
Students 1,108,717 18,127 125,544 345,823 1,598.211
Male 532,564 14,323 63,623 196,480 806,990
Female 576,153 3,804 61,921 149,343 791,221
Teachers 62,684 1,364 4,299 21,165 89,512
Male 25,292 1,103 2,131 3,193 31,719
Female 37,392 261 2,168 17,972 57,793
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
196 M. AL JABERY, J. AL KHATEEB, and M. ZUMBERG
professionals, and a limited set of adequately developed diagnostic and as-
sessment tools.
A population census survey conducted in 2004 estimated the number of
disabled individuals at 54,747 (Department of Statistics [DOS], 2004). The
results of this survey are shown in Table 11.2. This survey estimated the dis-
ability prevalence rate in Jordan at 1.3% of the general population. These
results probably seriously underestimate the actual prevalence rate of 10%
suggested by the United Nations (Mont, 2007). A main reason may be the
survey’s ignorance of high prevalence disability categories (i.e., learning
disabilities, communication disorders, emotional impairments, and mild
forms of disabilities). Regardless, this survey helped inform decision mak-
ers and the public of the presence of large numbers of persons with disabili-
ties in Jordan and helped expand special education services.
EVOLUTION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION IN JORDAN:
A BRIEF HISTORY
Educating children with special needs has been a major concern in Jor-
dan for three decades. Institutes were established for children with hear-
ing, visual, and cognitive impairments in the late 1960s. The Ministry of
Social Development established a directorate for special education and
the Queen Alia Fund for Social Welfare was established in the 1970s. The
ministry and the fund have played significant roles in administering and
monitoring special education services (Hadidi, 1998). The Ministry, along
with other private, public, and charitable associations, established more
and more special day schools and residential institutions, initiated on-the-
TABLE 11.2 Distribution of Persons with Disabilities
by Type of Disability and Gender
Number of students
Type of disability Males Females Total
Hearing Impairment 5,846 4,464 10,310
Physical Handicap 11,300 66,724 18,024
Cerebral Palsy 2,973 2,298 5,271
Cognitive Impairment 6,357 3,751 10,108
Visual Impairment 3,612 2,227 5,839
Multiple Handicap 5,022 3,402 8,424
Other 5,925 1,869 4,749
Unspecified 119 97 216
Total 38,154 24,832 62,968
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
Current Special Education Programs in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 197
job teacher training programs, and launched public awareness programs
(Hadidi, 1998). Most of the children served have been 6–15 years old.
The special education scene in Jordan began witnessing significant
changes starting in the early 1980s. In 1980, both the University of Jordan
and another institution, the College of Social Work, oered two-year diplo-
ma programs in special education. Extensive in-service training programs
about children with disabilities were initiated. As public and private interest
in the education of children with disabilities grew, the University of Jordan
established a Master’s degree program in 1985, then a Bachelor’s degree
program in 1993, and finally a Doctoral program in special education in
2000. In the last decade, more Jordanian universities and intermediate col-
leges oered undergraduate and graduate programs in special education.
To assure and support the quality of special education services, legisla-
tors in Jordan passed the Law for the Welfare of Disabled Persons in 1993.
According to this law, persons with disabilities in Jordan should be inte-
grated into public life and have the right to education and work commensu-
rate with their potentials and abilities (Al Jabery & Zumberg, 2008). Other
major rights included in this law are:
• The right to preventive health care and medical care
• The right to a suitable environment that provides the freedom of
mobility, safely and securely
• The right to obtain aids and equipment to help them learn, train,
move, and commute
• The right of the family to relief and support services
This law was revised in 2007 to acknowledge the rights of individuals
with disabilities as Jordanian citizens. The revised law stresses the rights of
persons with disabilities to live in an environment that allows them safe and
secure freedom of movement and to participate in decisions relevant to
their lives. In 2007, the Higher Council of Individuals with Disabilities also
was established to initiate national strategy that would improve the current
situation of services to disabled individuals in Jordan.
Since its establishment in the early 1990s by the Ministry of Education,
the Special Education Department has been establishing new resource
rooms. The government of Jordan more recently has been engaged actively
in the provision of equal educational opportunities for all students, regard-
less of their abilities. Within the context of the National Education Strategy
adopted by the Ministry of Education of Jordan in light of the Education
Reform for the Knowledge Economy (ERfKE) program, the government
seeks a new educational vision in which schools’ roles include providing
students with special needs with specialized programs and resources for
support (Al Khateeb & Al Khateeb, 2008).
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
198 M. AL JABERY, J. AL KHATEEB, and M. ZUMBERG
A joint project was implemented beginning in 2005 by the European
Commission for Education and Training (TEMPUS project) and two public
universities in Jordan (the University of Jordan and AL Hussein University),
and three other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to support inclu-
sive education in Jordan through opening an inclusive special education
support center at the University of Jordan (National Tempus Oce, 2002).
Currently, 25,951 individuals with special needs are being served through
182 institutions (also known as schools or centers) in the country (Ministry
of Social Development [MoSD], 2007). These institutions are directed and
supervised by dierent authorities (e.g., MoE, international organizations,
private sector—NGOs) working collaboratively with the majority organized
by MoSD and MoE (see Table 11.3).
The total number of students with disabilities served by the Ministry
of Education (MoE) in 2009 was 13,293 students, taught by 812 teachers
through 24 programs and 531 resource rooms (see Table 11.4). Another
3,671 gifted and talented students were taught by 524 teachers through
three public schools, 17 centers, and 24 resource rooms for gifted and tal-
ented students (MoE, 2008).
TRENDS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION RESEARCH IN JORDAN
Professionals in Jordan are aware of the importance of conducting research
related to special education. Research studies examining dierent aspects
of special education services have been conducted in Jordan by university
professors as well as graduate students. In a recent study, Al Khateeb (2009)
surveyed Arab special education research published in the last decade
throughout the Arab world. A total of 216 theses and journal studies were
surveyed. Results indicated that 34% of the studies were experimental and
66% were non-experimental.
TABLE 11.3 Distributions of Numbers of Individuals with Special
Needs and Number of Institutions by Controlling Authority
Authority
Category
MoSD
Ministry of
Health (MoH)
Private Sector
Voluntary
Sector
International
Organizations
(IO)
Community
Based
Rehabilitation
(CBR)
Number of individuals 1,447 9,375 1,800 9,000 3,749 5,000
Number of institutions 14 2 36 100 14 19
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
Current Special Education Programs in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 199
Forty eight percent of those surveyed were studies published in refer-
eed journals, while 52% were master’s theses and doctoral dissertations.
The disabilities most commonly addressed in these studies were the special
education categories of learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, mul-
tiple disabilities, and hearing impairments. The topic most often found
in these studies was testing program eectiveness (Abu Hassona, 2004; Al
Ayed, 2007; Al Khateeb, 2004; Badarneh, 2006; Makahleh, 1999; Obeidat,
2003; Zaghlawan, Ostrosky, & Al Khateeb, 2007). Other topics found in-
cluded characteristics and needs of students (Khazaleh, 2007), inclusion
(Al Ayed, 2003; Al Bostanjy, 2002; Al Khateeb, 2002, 2003; Al-Zyoudi, 2006;
Jafar, 2003; Khezai, 2001), description and evaluation of special education
and related services (Abu Hawash, 2007; Al Khateeb & Al Khateeb, 2008;
Bahrawi, 2007; McBride, 2007; Nahhas, 2004), measurement and assess-
ment (Al Bostanjy, 2007; Al Jabery, 2008), family-related issues (Al Khateeb
& Al Hasan, 2000; Bairat, 2005; Yousef & Hadidi, 1992), and teacher-related
issues (Al Khateeb, 2007a, 2007b; Al Khateeb, Hadidi, & Elayyan, 1991; Qa-
tanani, 2005). Data collection tools most frequently used were scales and
tests (40%), questionnaires (39%), and both tools (scales and tests, and
questionnaires) (17%).
Due to space limitations, only illustrative examples of special education
research carried out in Jordan will be provided in this chapter. Only one
study will be presented to illustrate Jordanian studies conducted in the last
five years in the following areas: special education teacher preparation, as-
sessment, teaching children with special needs in regular schools, assistive
technology, and program evaluation.
A study using mixed research methodologies was conducted by Qatanani
(2005) to evaluate the eectiveness of the undergraduate special education
program provided by the University of Jordan. The study investigated the
TABLE 11.4 Distributions of Students with Disabilities, Teachers,
and Number of Programs by Type of Services
Services
Categories
Hearing
Impairment
Programs
Visual
Impairment
programs
Cognitive
Impairment
Special Classes
Learning
Disability
Resource Rooms
Gifted and
Talented Schools
Total
Number of students 818 280 35 12,160 3,671 16,965
Number of programs 17 2 5 531 44 599
Number of teachers 152 120 9 531 524 1,336
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
200 M. AL JABERY, J. AL KHATEEB, and M. ZUMBERG
opinions of program participants (students and faculty members) regard-
ing the eectiveness of the program. Results showed that both students
and faculty members were satisfied with the current status of the program.
A better balance, however, between the theoretical preparation using the
course work and practical applications of theory was identified as needed.
To explore the status of assessment practices in special education in Jor-
dan, Al Bostanjy (2007) studied assessment purposes, working as a team
(consisting of the regular education and special education teachers), the
information gathering process, areas of assessment, types of assessment
tools, steps that follow the assessment process, and alternative assessment
methods. Results of this study indicated that the main two purposes of as-
sessment practices in Jordan were for instructional planning and progress
evaluation. The study also found that the concept of teaming was missing in
the majority of these practices, although the inclusion of the regular educa-
tion teacher was found in some of these practices.
The attitudes of general and special education teachers toward inclusive
education in Jordanian schools, and the factors that could influence these
attitudes were studied by Al Zyoudi (2006). Results indicated that teachers
supported the right of students with disabilities to have a chance to attend
public schools. Teachers’ attitudes, moreover, were found to be strongly
influenced by the nature and severity of disability with primary concern
expressed toward physical disabilities, followed by sensory disabilities, and
lastly by mental retardation and behavior problems. The length of teaching
experience with students with special needs positively influenced teachers’
attitudes. Teachers also indicated a need for training in areas of parent–
teacher collaboration, developing Individualized Educational Programs
(IEPs), preparing instructional plans, writing behavior modification plans,
and making curriculum adaptations.
A study exploring the nature of assistive technology (AT) utilization with
individuals with special needs in Jordan was conducted by Abu Hawash
(2007). The study also explored the barriers that could hinder a functional
utilization of AT devices in Jordan. The researcher developed an instru-
ment that measures level of AT device utilization and implemented it with
766 teachers serving individuals with special needs in Jordan. The level of
use of AT devices was found to range between low to average. The high-
est level of utilization was in the area of computer applications, while the
lowest level was in the area of environmental control. The highest level of
utilization also was with students with visual impairment. The most available
type of services was reported as teacher training in using AT devices while
the lowest was in the provision of sucient financial support as a shortage
of funding resources was indicated.
The status of related services introduced to individuals with mental re-
tardation in Jordan and the barriers that might hinder the usefulness of
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
Current Special Education Programs in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 201
providing these services were evaluated by Bahrawi (2007). The researcher
prepared an instrument to measure the aspects targeted by the study that was
distributed to 55 special education institutions in Jordan. The results of the
study indicated that the level of provision of related services in Jordan was
moderate. High implementation of services was found with adapted physical
education while low implementation of services included occupational, phys-
ical, speech and language, and assistive technology services. Results related
to barriers identified indicated that lack of funding resources and limited
training and program preparation opportunities (either for related services
specialists or special education teachers) were the main barriers limiting the
usefulness of these services. Bahrawi concluded that improving the situation
required more attention to solving the financial and funding issues as well as
to supporting personnel preparation and training programs.
CURRENT CHALLENGES
Special education services in Jordan are still developing. By looking at the
current status of special education services in Jordan, it is evident that many
challenges could hinder the progress of these services. These challenges
can be organized into the following areas, as mentioned in the Al Jabery
and Zumberg (2008) study: financial challenges, practices and instruc-
tional challenges, information challenges, and challenges related to public
awareness.
Financial Challenges
The shortage in funding resources represents a challenge in Jordan.
This challenge emerges basically from the limitations in natural resources
and the current political situations in the area of the Middle East, since
Jordan is located in the heart of this conflict zone. Many special education
services in Jordan are in need of revision, expansion, and improvement to
meet the increasing number in children with disabilities and the growing
demand by parents to have services for their children.
Practices and Instructional Challenges
Most special education institutions in Jordan have limited resources with
which to provide eective and suitable services. These institutions are faced
with technical and management diculties such as inadequate building
construction and capacity, poor transportation, limited class space, lack of
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
202 M. AL JABERY, J. AL KHATEEB, and M. ZUMBERG
trained personnel, absence of health insurance, low salaries, exclusion of par-
ents’ involvement, and ignorance of the importance of in-service training.
Information Challenges
A lack of accurate and unified statistical data regarding disability rep-
resents another challenge in Jordan. Researchers, policymakers, and edu-
cators are faced with this challenge when conducting research related to
special education in Jordan. Accurate statistical data are needed to under-
stand the situation in the areas of type of introduced services, number of
cases served by each type, ratio of disabilities, change in the total number
of persons with disabilities (developing a tracking system), and indicators
of program eectiveness (eectiveness of special education programs in
various educational settings).
Public Awareness Challenges
The lack of public awareness, insucient involvement of local communi-
ties, the negative role of media, and limited attention by policy and com-
munity leaders constitute another set of challenges. There is an absence of
any planned strategies or agendas to inform the public or to publicize the
issue of disability in Jordan. Although some eorts currently are being im-
plemented by special education institutions, these eorts are disconnected
from each other, causing more confusion and wasting of time and eort.
Taking into consideration these challenges, specific suggestions are of-
fered below to address the situation based on recommendations from Al
Jabery and Zumberg (2008).
1. Securing and creating new financial resources or funding opportuni-
ties to help current institutions improve their services and assist in
establishing new institutions to expand the delivery of special educa-
tion services. To achieve this, collaboration with international orga-
nizations and other countries around the world should be utilized
by securing agreements and getting grants to support and improve
these services.
2. Creating a centralized agency to function as an umbrella that or-
ganizes, supervises, integrates, and monitors the delivery of special
education services. This agency might be part of the MoE or MoSD
or another authority in Jordan. The responsibilities of such an agen-
cy would include improving, organizing, monitoring, evaluating, and
expanding the delivery of services for students with disabilities.
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
Current Special Education Programs in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 203
3. Expanding the service delivery system and giving further consid-
eration to educational issues that support inclusion and main-
streaming. It is necessary to re-evaluate current teacher prepara-
tion programs in order to further meet the needs of students with
disabilities. New technological innovations in the field of assistive
technology and other related fields, and application of the philoso-
phies of prevention, early intervention, and inclusion also must be
considered in program initiatives.
4. Supporting and encouraging local communities to take part in the
delivery of services by the use of public media (mass media, news-
papers, and television) to increase public awareness. It is necessary
to increase community knowledge about disabilities and disabled
people, medical issues and hygiene, and prevention and early inter-
vention procedures.
5. Establishing a widespread information database to include the
information needed about a disability condition in Jordan. This will
represent a basic data source for professionals, parents, policymak-
ers, and researchers. This database should be updated annually and
accessed easily in order to help improving the situation.
CONCLUSION
This chapter provided an overview of current programs for students with
special needs in Jordan. It described the evolution of these programs, their
organization and administration, their main features, and the challenges
facing their implementation. Examples of research studies that may help
explain the content of this chapter were reviewed with an indication to
their important results and recommendations. As seen from these studies,
current special education programs for individuals with disabilities in Jor-
dan seem to be progressing. Challenges that might hinder improvement
in services were introduced and some suggestions to overcome them were
oered. Overall, it was our intention through this chapter to introduce spe-
cial education programs in Jordan to the international community to en-
hance future communications and networking avenues.
REFERENCES
Abu Hassona, N. (2004). Eectiveness of a training program in enhancing self-concept,
social competence, and achievement among students with learning disabilities. Un-
published doctoral dissertation, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan (in
Arabic).
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
204 M. AL JABERY, J. AL KHATEEB, and M. ZUMBERG
Abu Hawash, R. (2007). Evaluation of the current assistive technology services for
students with special needs in Jordan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the
University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Al Ayed, W. (2003). Challenges encountered by resource room teachers in primary schools in
Jordan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan
(in Arabic).
Al Ayed, W. (2007). Eects of a training program on the working memory of resource room
students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Jordan, Am-
man, Jordan (in Arabic).
Al Bostanjy, M. (2002). Social interactions among resource room students and regular class-
room students in Amman schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, the University of
Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Al Bostanjy, M. (2007). The actual status of assessment in assessment of special education
in Jordan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Jordan, Am-
man, Jordan (in Arabic).
Al Jabery, M. (2008). The examination of validity and reliability indicators of the Jor-
danian Arabic version of Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS-2) (January 1,
2008). ETD Collection for Wayne State University. Paper AAI3315610. Retrieved
from http://digitalcommons.wayne .edu/dissertations/AAI3315610
Al Jabery, M., & Zumberg, M. (2008). General and special education systems in Jor-
dan: present and future perspectives. International Journal of Special Education,
23(1), 115–122.
Al Khateeb, J. (1993). Teachers of mentally retarded children’s knowledge of behav-
ior modification principles. Dirasat, 20, 338–355 (in Arabic).
Al Khateeb, J. (2002). Perceptions of Jordanian teachers of inclusion. Educational
Journal of Kuwait University, 17, 17–42 (in Arabic).
Al Khateeb, J. (2003). Eects of mainstreaming on the social acceptance of children
with special needs. Special Education Academy Journal, 3, 13-30 (in Arabic).
Al Khateeb, J. (2004). Eectiveness of a training program in developing teachers`
knowledge of behavior modification of children with intellectual disability.
Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 3, 239–261 (in Arabic).
Al Khateeb, J. (2007a). A survey of general education teachers’ knowledge of learn-
ing disabilities in Jordan. International Journal of Special Education, 22(1), 72–76.
Al Khateeb, J. (2007b). The impact of training on general education teachers’
knowledge and acceptance of inclusion of students with learning disabilities
in Jordan. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 4(1), 13–22.
Al Khateeb, J. (2009, March). A trends analysis of special education research in Arab
countries. Unpublished report, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in
Arabic).
Al Khateeb, J. & Al Hasan, M. (2000). Needs of parents of handicapped children in
Jordan. Dirasat, 27, 1–16 [in Arabic].
Al Khateeb, J., & Al Khateeb, F. (2008). Educating students with mild intellectual
disabilities in Jordan. Journal of the International Association of Special Education,
9, 47–56.
Al Khateeb, J., Hadidi, M., & Elayyan, K. (1991). The morale of special education
teachers in Jordan. Dirasat, 18, 62–79 (in Arabic).
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
Current Special Education Programs in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 205
Al-Zyoudi, M. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education In Jordanian
schools. International Journal of Special Education, 21(2), 55–62.
Badarneh, M. (2006). Developing social-emotional skills of resource room students. Unpub-
lished master’s thesis, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Bahrawi, A. (2007). Evaluation of the current related services used with children with men-
tal retardation in Jordan. Unpublished doctoraldissertation, the University of
Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Bairat, M. (2005). Parent satisfaction with inclusion of their children with learning dis-
abilities in resource rooms in Jordan. Unpublished master’s thesis, the University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Department of Statistics (DOS). (2004). Population and housing census. Amman.
Government report. H.K.J Department of Statistics (DOS) Population and
Housing Census-Census Subjects- Characteristics of Special Needs Web site:
Retrieved from http://www.dos.gov.jo/sdb_pop/sdb_pop_e/inde_o.htm.
Department of Statistics (DOS). (2007). Estimation of population by governorate and sex.
Amman. Government report. H.K. Department of Statistics (DOS) website. Re-
trieved from http://www.dos.gov.jo/sdb_pop/sdb_pop_e/inde_o.htm.
Directorate of Special Education. (2008). Resource rooms in public schools. Government
report (in Arabic). Ministry of Education—Special Education Directorate web-
site. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.jo/SPECIAL_EDU/Page3.htm.
Hadidi, M. (1998). Educational programs for children with special needs in Jordan.
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 23(2), 147–154.
Hadidi, M. (2003). Problems faced by resource room teachers in Jordan. Journal of
the Arab Academy of Special Education, 2, 1–40 (in Arabic).
Jafar, G. (2003). Teachers’ perspectives on problems related to inclusion of students with
special educational needs in Jordan. Unpublished master’s thesis, the University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Khazaleh, A. (2007). Social and emotional skills of students with learning disabilities and
non-disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Jor-
dan. Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Khezai, A. (2001). Ecacy of resource room teachers in Jordan. Unpublished master’s
thesis, the University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Makahleh, A. (1999). Eects of a training program in improving the reading skills of
students with learning disabilities. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Jor-
dan. Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
McBride, S. (2007). Special education programs in Jordan: A situational analysis. Report
submitted to the Ministry of Education, Amman, Jordan.
Ministry of Education (MoE). (2004). The Development of Education: National report of
the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan: presented to the 47th session of the International
Conference on Education Geneva (8–11 September 2004). Geneva. Government re-
port. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/international/databanks/
dossiers/Jordan
Ministry of Education (MoE). (2008). The educational statistics for the year 2007/2008,
Amman. Government report (in Arabic). H.K.J Ministry of Education-Man-
aging Directorate of Educational Planning-Statistics Department Website. Re-
trieved from http://www.moe.gov.jo/EDSS/EducStatist2007-2008/Index.htm
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
© 2012 IAP
All rights reserved
206 M. AL JABERY, J. AL KHATEEB, and M. ZUMBERG
Ministry of Social Development (MSD). (2007). Ministry of social development: Special
education department [PowerPoint slides in Arabic]. H.K.J Ministry of Social
Development Website. Retrieved from http://www.mosd.gov.jo/index.php?o
ption=comconten&task=view&id=17&Itemid=23
Mont, D. (2007). Measuring disability prevalence. Washington, DC: World Bank, the
Disability & Development Team.
Nahhas, A. (2004). Evaluation of educational programs oered to students with hearing
impairment in Jordan from the perspective of administrators, teachers, parents, and
students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Amman Arab University, Am-
man, Jordan (in Arabic).
National Tempus Oce in Jordan. (2002). Selected projects involving Jordan: Tempus
III selection rounds 2002–2006. Organization Report. Retrieved from http://
ec.europa.eu/education/programms/tempus/countries/projects/jordan.pdf
Obeidat, Y. (2003). Eects of cooperative learning on the achievement and social interac-
tions of students with learning disabilities. Unpublished master’s thesis, Amman
Arab University, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Qatanani, H. (2005). Evaluation of the undergraduate special education program
in the university of Jordan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Univer-
sity of Jordan, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Yousef, J & Hadidi (1992). Families of children with disabilities in Jordan. Interna-
tional Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 39, 127–133.
Zaghlawan, H., Ostrosky, M., & Al Khateeb, J. (2007). Decreasing the inattentive
behavior of Jordanian children: A group experiment. Education and Treatment
of Children, 30, 49–64.
Author Query:
Hadidi (2003) and Directorate of Special Education (2008) are listed
in your references but not cited in the text. Please either add a citation or
remove from your references.
... At the present time, there are 900 part-time resource rooms within regular schools across Jordan, which offer remedial and special education services to 12,160 children from the second to sixth grades with SLD ( Al-Natour, AlKhamra, & Al-Smadi, 2008). The Ministry of Education (MoE) suggests that 20 to 25 students with SLD are served in these settings ( Al Jabery, AlKhateeb & Zumberg, 2012;Al Jabery, AlKhateeb & Zumberg, 2012). As integrating efforts continue, resource room teachers have been assigned the sole responsibility for supporting students with disabilities, while regular classroom teachers are not yet involved effectively in addressing the needs of included children ( Abu-Hamour & Al-Hmouz, 2013). ...
... At the present time, there are 900 part-time resource rooms within regular schools across Jordan, which offer remedial and special education services to 12,160 children from the second to sixth grades with SLD ( Al-Natour, AlKhamra, & Al-Smadi, 2008). The Ministry of Education (MoE) suggests that 20 to 25 students with SLD are served in these settings ( Al Jabery, AlKhateeb & Zumberg, 2012;Al Jabery, AlKhateeb & Zumberg, 2012). As integrating efforts continue, resource room teachers have been assigned the sole responsibility for supporting students with disabilities, while regular classroom teachers are not yet involved effectively in addressing the needs of included children ( Abu-Hamour & Al-Hmouz, 2013). ...
Article
Impulsive behavior is a characteristic of children with specific learning disabilities (SLD), and is related to learning ability. The present study aims to identify impulsivity behavior in children with SLD who attend inclusion schools, from their resource room teachers’ perspectives. A 31-item questionnaire that addressed four subscales was designed, and the study sample consisted of 103 resource room teachers of children with SLD from various inclusion schools in Al-Zarqa city in Jordan. The results revealed that the main problem was related to lack of premeditation, followed by lack of perseverance and urgency. The results also indicated that there were statistically significant differences only for the Lack of Perseverance subscale, with regard to level of disability, whereas there were no differences attributed to teacher gender, child gender, and age. Based on these findings, implications and recommendations are discussed.
... It has been observed that teaching children with intellectual disabilities in special education centers and institutions in Jordan is based on the IQ concept that they are taught according to their intellectual ability level. Furthermore, most activities and training provided for children with intellectual disabilities in the current curriculum are irrelevant and do not assist in rehabilitating those children to live and integrate into society; especially that teachers do not have a sufficient experience to deal with students with disabilities in terms of planning for teaching, conducting behavior, and employing effective teaching methods (Al Jabery et al., 2012). The current educational practices, modeled according to global and local laws, do not focus on developing fundamental academic skills such as reading, writing, and mathematics, while functional and social skills do not pay proper attention resulting in non-acquisition of these skills and the inability to achieve a smooth and appropriate transition to the post-school stage. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to identify the importance of functional skills among students with intellectual disabilities as perceived by their special education teachers according to the teachers' experience, academic qualification, and gender. One hundred teachers (28 males and 72 females) working in special education centers in Jordan participated in the study. To achieve the objectives of this study, the researchers developed a Functional Skills Questionnaire (FSQ) that contains 95 items covered twelve categories of functional skills to explore the importance of these skills as perceived by teachers. The findings showed a high degree of functional skills' importance for the total score and across all of the scale dimension. The findings also presented that there were no significant differences attributed to years of experience and gender variables, while there was a significant difference attributed to the academic qualification variable in favor of the master's degree holders.
... This explanation is supported by the current study results, where parents reported that teachers did not encourage them to participate in their child's remedial education team, representing a significant barrier to their involvement in the education process for their child with SLD. Similarly, Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler (1997) note that teachers may have negative attitudes towards parental involvement, while some teachers are unprepared for working collaboratively with parents (Al Jabery, AlKhateeb, and Zumberg 2012;Darch, Miao, and Shippen 2004). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to investigate the barriers to parental involvement in Jordanian mainstream schools from the parents’ perspective. A 36-item questionnaire that addressed five domains was designed specifically for this study and distributed to 206 parents of children with specific learning disabilities. The results reveal that the main barrier to parental involvement relates to parents’ beliefs, followed by barriers related to mainstream schools’ teachers and team work, while ‘available facilities’ was viewed as the least significant barrier. The results indicate that there were statistically significant differences regarding parental income level for each of the five domains and the overall scale, but there were no differences attributable to parents’ educational levels and gender. Based on these findings, a number of suggestions and recommendations are made.
Article
Full-text available
هدفت هذه الدراسة الى معرفة تأثيرات الدمج على القبول الاجتماعي للأطفال ذوي الحاجات الخاصة من قبل أقرانهم الأطفال العاديين. ولتحقيق هذا الهدف ، تم اختيار عينة طبقية ضمت (390) طالباً وطالبة من الصفين السادس والسابع في أربع مدارس اثنتين منها تنفذ الدمج والاثنتين الأخريين لا تنفذ الدمج. وتم تطوير أداة لجمع المعلومات عن مستوى القبـول الاجتماعي تتمتع بدلالات صدق وثبات مقبولة ، وتم تطبيقها على أفراد الدراسة على شكل مجموعات. وبعد ذلك استخرجت متوسطات القبول الاجتماعي وحللت البيانات باستخدام تحليل التباين الاحادي. وقد أشارت النتائج الى ان مستوى القبول الاجتماعي للأطفال ذوي الحاجات الخاصة من قبل أقرانهم الاطفال العاديين كان مرتفعاً نسبياً ، ولكنه كان اكثر ارتفاعاً وبشكل دال احصائياً لدى الآطفال الذين تنفذ برامج دمج في مدارسهم. أما متغير الجنس فلم يكن له أثر دال حيث لم توجد فروق جوهرية بين استجابات الذكور والاناث.
Article
Full-text available
This study evaluated the effects of a training program on Jordanian classroom teachers' knowledge of the characteristics and needs of students with learning disabilities. The study also investigated whether such training influenced teachers' acceptance of including these students into their classrooms. Sixty teachers were randomly assigned to an experimental group (30 teachers) and a control group (30 teachers). Both groups of teachers completed a test of knowledge of learning disabilities and a survey of teacher acceptance of inclusion of students with learning disabilities into general education classrooms. Both data collection instruments were administered before implementation of the training program (pretest) and after completion of the training (posttest). ANCOVA was used to analyze the data. Results indicated that the training program had significant effects on both teachers' knowledge of the characteristics and needs of students with learning disabilities and their acceptance of including these students into their classrooms. The implications of these results for including students with learning disabilities in Jordan are discussed.
Article
The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers' attitudes towards inclusive education in Jordan, and the factors that influenced such attitudes. Qualitative research was used to gather information from all general education and special education teachers. The sample consisted of 90 teachers at 7 schools. The results of this study showed that teachers' attitudes were found to be strongly influenced by the nature and severity of the disabling condition presented to them, the length of teaching experience, and training.