Content uploaded by Holger H Sudhoff
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Holger H Sudhoff on Dec 22, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Page 1 of 8
Compeng interests: none declared. Conict of interests: none declared.
All authors contributed to the concepon, design, and preparaon of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the nal manuscript.
All authors abide by the Associaon for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure.
Original research study
Upile T, Jerjes W, Johal O, Lew-Gor S, Mahil J, Sudhoff H. A new tool to inform intra-operative
Abstract
Introduction
-
-
carcinoma against normal and some
Materials and methods
-
-
-
Results
-
Discriminating elastic spectral differ-
-
skin lesions of similar appearance.
Conclusion
elastic scattering spectroscopy can
-
ants of normal skin. Elastic scattering
-
-
A new tool to inform intra-operative decision making in skin cancer
treatment: the non-invasive assessment of basal cell carcinoma of
the skin using elastic scattering spectroscopy
T Upile32211
-
conditions.
Introduction
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
eas of cosmetic importance or near
important goals of disease removal
-
proper treatment delivery and its ef-
-
-
treatment.
-
and an improved prognosis for a pa-
-
-
ment in ‘real-time’.
-
related to its primary aetiology—
-
neck
-
-
-
-
is a good predictor of relative risk
1
2
3
Upile T, Jerjes W, Johal O, Lew-Gor S, Mahil J, Sudhoff H. A new tool to inform intra-operative
Page 2 of 8
Compeng interests: none declared. Conict of interests: none declared.
All authors contributed to the concepon, design, and preparaon of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the nal manuscript.
All authors abide by the Associaon for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure.
Original research study
-
-
vanced disease.
-
in terms of errors of interpretation
weeks to complete and interpret).
-
dependent.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
consider elastic scattering spectros-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ganelles
-
-
-
-
-
non-invasively and in real-time.
Materials and methods
-
-
-
-
-
tailed2
of concern. If excision was clinically
-
-
-
-
Page 3 of 8
Compeng interests: none declared. Conict of interests: none declared.
All authors contributed to the concepon, design, and preparaon of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the nal manuscript.
All authors abide by the Associaon for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure.
Upile T, Jerjes W, Johal O, Lew-Gor S, Mahil J, Sudhoff H. A new tool to inform intra-operative
Original research study
-
-
24.
Results
±
-
-
lesions for comparative analysis. No
-
-
-
-
-
in a cosmetically sensitive manner.
Statistical approach for model
generation and model validation
2
-
-
-
-
discriminate analysis (LDA) strate-
-
-
-
-
Table 1 The 4 most common
pathologies of the paent populaon
studied
Diagnosis %
BCC 28.8
Intra-dermal naevus 21.9
Fibro-epithelial polyp 13.7
Seborrhoeic keratosis 9.6
Other benign lesions 26
Table 2 The number of pathological
sites interrogated and number of
site specic spectra obtained
Number
of sites
Number
of spectra
BCC 59 570
Intra-dermal
naevus
31 633
Fibro-epithelial
polyp
23 502
Benign
seborrhoeic
keratosis
12 269
Normal skin 125 551
400
−2
500 600
Wavelength
700 800
−1
0
Intensity
1
2
Figure 1: A representative elastic
-
−5
0.0
0 5
Score
10
0.1
0.2
0.3
Frequency
0.4
0.5
400
−2
−1
0
Intensity
1
2
400 600
Wavelength
700 800
Figure 2:
-
-
plot2
-
sis (orange) spectra.
Upile T, Jerjes W, Johal O, Lew-Gor S, Mahil J, Sudhoff H. A new tool to inform intra-operative
Page 4 of 8
Compeng interests: none declared. Conict of interests: none declared.
All authors contributed to the concepon, design, and preparaon of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the nal manuscript.
All authors abide by the Associaon for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure.
Original research study
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table 3 Analysis results and ability of the elasc spectroscopy technique to discriminate between normal, benign and
malignant lesions. Also shown is the similar discriminang ability of the technique when comparing readings taken from
the periphery of a BCC and the centre of the BCC
Sensivity Specicity Accuracy
Per spectra Per site Per spectra Per site Per spectra Per site
BCC vs intra-dermal naevus 0.8789474 0.9859155 0.9787928 0.8846154 0.9306847 0.9587629
BCC vs bro-epithelial polyp 0.8385965 0.9577465 0.8884462 0.7826087 0.8619403 0.9148936
BCC vs benign seborrhoeic keratosis 0.9543860 1 0.9665428 0.9166667 0.9582837 0.9879518
BCC vs normal 0.8842105 0.9436620 0.7422868 0.4324324 0.8144514 0.6827586
BCC periphery vs BCC centre 0.115880 0.3750000 0.6720257 0.3939394 0.4319853 0.3846154
Intra-dermal naevus vs bro-epithelial polyp 0.8036466 1.0000000 0.8286853 0.6521739 0.8139918 0.8490566
Intra-dermal naevus vs benign seborrhoeic
keratosis
0.6579926 0.7500000 0.9929874 0.8666667 0.9012220 0.8333333
Fibro-epithelial polyp vs benign seborrhoeic
keratosis
0.8996283 0.9166667 0.9581673 0.7391304 0.9377432 0.8000000
0.0 0.2 0.4
0.0
0.6 0.8
1-specificity
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Sensivity
0.8
1.0
Figure 3:
-
400
−2
500 600
Wavelength
700 800
−1
0
Intensity
1
2
Figure 4: A representative elastic
−5
0.0
0 5
Score
10
0.2
0.4
0.8
Frequency
0.6
1.0
1.2
400
−2
−1
0
Intensity
1
2
400 600
Wavelength
700 800
Figure 5:
-
-
-
2
Compeng interests: none declared. Conict of interests: none declared.
All authors contributed to the concepon, design, and preparaon of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the nal manuscript.
All authors abide by the Associaon for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure.
Upile T, Jerjes W, Johal O, Lew-Gor S, Mahil J, Sudhoff H. A new tool to inform intra-operative
Original research study
-
-
operative cancer resection and
-
since clones of differing aggressivity
-
Discussion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
terpreted as an indicative of cancer.
-
-
0.0 0.2 0.4
0.0
0.6 0.8
1-specificity
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Sensivity
0.8
1.0
Figure 6:
400
−2
500 600
Wavelength
700 800
−1
0
Intensity
1
2
Figure 7: A representative elastic
-
−5
0.0
0 5
Score
10
0.1
0.3
Frequency
0.2
0.4
0.5
400
−2
−1
0
Intensity
1
2
400 600
Wavelength
700 800
Figure 8:
-
2
-
Figure 9:
trade-off of sensitivity against specif-
-
-
-
0.0 0.2 0.4
0.0
0.6 0.8
1-specificity
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Sensivity
0.8
1.0
Upile T, Jerjes W, Johal O, Lew-Gor S, Mahil J, Sudhoff H. A new tool to inform intra-operative
Compeng interests: none declared. Conict of interests: none declared.
All authors contributed to the concepon, design, and preparaon of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the nal manuscript.
All authors abide by the Associaon for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure.
Original research study
-
lesions in a primary care setting2. It is
-
-
-
-
resection in primary care settings
-
-
-
-
patient care.
Challenges
-
-
-
2
-
-
400 500 600
−2
700
Wavelength
800
−1
0
1
Intensity
2
Figure 10: -
-
-
-
nign lesions and normal.
Table 4 BCC vs normal skin results
Comparison of the histological diagnosis and ESS in the diagnosis of the skin pathology group
Test: ESS
diagnosis
Disease: BCC histological diagnosis (Gold standard)
Sites BCC Normal Total (n)
BCC (59) True posive (TP) 397 False posive (FP) 29 All with posive test = (TP + FP) 426
Normal (125) False negave (FN) 113 True negave (TN) 118 All with negave test = (FN + TN) 231
Total (n) All with disease 510 All without disease 147 All = (TP + FP + FN + TN) 657
Sensivity = TP/(TP + FN) 77.8%
Specicity = TN/(TN + FP) 80.3%
Pre-test probability = (TP + FN)/(TP + FP + FN + TN) 64.8%
Posive predicve value = TP/(TP + FP) 93.2%
Negave predicve value = TN/(FN + TN) 51.1%
0.0 0.2 0.4
0.0
0.6 0.8
1-specificity
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Sensivity
0.8
1.0
Figure 11:
-
-
-
Compeng interests: none declared. Conict of interests: none declared.
All authors contributed to the concepon, design, and preparaon of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the nal manuscript.
All authors abide by the Associaon for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure.
Upile T, Jerjes W, Johal O, Lew-Gor S, Mahil J, Sudhoff H. A new tool to inform intra-operative
Original research study
-
cal intranodal metastasis in oral cancer
-
-
cal intranodal metastasis in oral cancer
-
-
-
-
gramme for oral cancer and precancer
-
-
-
-
conditions.
Abbreviations list
-
Acknowledgement
Declaration
-
References
-
-
-
-
tion alone2 -
-
-
Conclusion
-
-
-
-
ness and non-operator dependence.
-
-
improve management and prognosis.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Upile T, Jerjes W, Johal O, Lew-Gor S, Mahil J, Sudhoff H. A new tool to inform intra-operative
Page 8 of 8
Compeng interests: none declared. Conict of interests: none declared.
All authors contributed to the concepon, design, and preparaon of the manuscript, as well as read and approved the nal manuscript.
All authors abide by the Associaon for Medical Ethics (AME) ethical rules of disclosure.
Original research study
-
-
-
-
gramme for oral cancer and precancer
Elastic scattering spectroscopy for
044022.
diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer
-
Real-time Raman spectroscopy for non-
invasive skin cancer detection—prelimi-
-