Article

Contrast alternatives for iodinated contrast allergy and renal dysfunction: Options and limitations

Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter (Impact Factor: 3.02). 12/2012; 57(2). DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

Diagnostic angiography and vascular interventions make routine use of iodinated contrast material (ICM). Patients with renal disease or contrast allergy pose limitations on the use of ICM. In such cases, alternative contrast media may be used to carry out the procedure. Current alternatives include carbon dioxide, gadolinium, and dilute ICM. Each of these alternatives has its own unique features and limitations. In the present review article, the current alternatives to ICM are explored, with a focus on the applications and restrictions of each.

  • Source
    • "It is particularly useful in patients who are hypersensitive to iodinated contrast or have compromised renal function [9]. We report the first case of CO 2 gas embolism causing multiple diffuse bilateral strokes in a patient undergoing CO 2 angiogram for thrombosed AV fistula. "

    Preview · Article · Jul 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to test the use of CO(2) as a black blood contrast agent for MR imaging-guided vascular procedures in an animal model. Repeated intraarterial CO(2) injections were performed through a catheter located in the aorta and the renal arteries of three fully anesthetized pigs. Real-time images were acquired using a steady-state free precession sequence. During the CO(2) injections, the bright blood in the aorta and the main renal artery was totally replaced, and this procedure resulted in an immediate, statistically significant signal loss in the vessel lumen. In more peripheral vessels, CO(2) improved the vessel conspicuity substantially. Confirmation of vessel patency distal to the catheter tip position was possible. The use of carbon dioxide in combination with a bright blood MR imaging sequence improves vessel conspicuity and provides immediate information about blood flow distal to the catheter. This technique may be used to facilitate MR imaging-guided intravascular procedures.
    Preview · Article · Sep 2003 · American Journal of Roentgenology
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a large variability observed in the literature regarding radiation exposure and contrast volume injection during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Reducing both in order to decrease their respective toxicities must be a priority for the endovascular therapist. Radiation dose reduction requires a strict application of the "as low as reasonably achievable" principles. Firstly, all X-ray system settings should be defaulted to low dose, and fluoroscopic time reduced as much as possible. Digital subtraction angiography runs should be replaced by recorded fluoroscopy runs when possible. Magnification should be avoided, whereas collimation should be systematic to minimize scatter radiation and focus only on the area of interest. Advanced imaging modes can also contribute to dose reduction. For instance, image fusion can facilitate endovascular navigation, and allow table and C-arm positioning without fluoroscopy. In our experience, routine use of image fusion during EVAR significantly reduces both radiation exposure and contrast volumes during complex EVAR. To make these imaging modes useable in real life settings, the X-ray system should be fully controlled by the operator from table side. Reducing iodinated contrast volume, while maintaining image quality, can also be achieved through the use of automated contrast injectors. Additionally, alternative contrast agents, like carbon dioxide (CO2) and gadolinium, have also been evaluated and can be used in specific cases. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and intravascular ultrasonography are currently developed as potential alternatives to both iodinated contrast use and X-ray during EVAR. Lastly, specific education and training of operators in radiation protection are essential.
    No preview · Article · Apr 2014 · The Journal of cardiovascular surgery
Show more