Preferences for Family Involvement in Care Among Consumers With Serious Mental Illness

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) (Impact Factor: 2.41). 12/2012; 64(3). DOI: 10.1176/
Source: PubMed


Despite robust evidence of efficacy, family services for individuals diagnosed as having serious mental illness are of limited availability and drastically underutilized. This underutilization may be due to a mismatch between consumer and family preferences and the services offered. This study is the first systematic report on preferences expressed by consumers with serious mental illness for family involvement.

The study enrolled 232 mental health consumers with serious mental illness who had contact with family but did not have any family regularly involved in their mental health care. Consumers were recruited from outpatient mental health clinics at three large medical centers in two Veterans Integrated Service Networks. Interviews elicited demographic characteristics, treatment preferences regarding family involvement, and perceived benefits and barriers to involvement. Chart diagnoses and measures of symptom severity, family functioning, and contact were collected.

Seventy-eight percent (171 of 219) of the consumers wanted family members to be involved in their care, and many desired involvement through several methods. Consumers were concerned with the impact of involvement on both themselves and their family member. The consumer's degree of perceived benefit of family involvement significantly predicted the degree of desire for family involvement after analyses controlled for service need (family conflict, family-related quality of life, and symptom severity), enabling factors (family contact and family capacity), demographic variables (age, gender, race, living with family, and marital status), and barriers perceived by the consumer.

The extent of overall support for family involvement in care coupled with the heterogeneity of preferred modes and concerns and anticipated benefits underscore the imperative to offer diverse family services and to elicit consumers' preferences regarding whether and how to involve their families.

Download full-text


Available from: Amy N Cohen, Oct 05, 2015

  • No preview · Article · Jun 2013 · Australasian Psychiatry
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The Recovery-Oriented Decisions for Relatives' Support (REORDER) intervention is an innovative, manualized protocol utilizing shared decision-making principles with persons who have serious mental illnesses to promote recovery and encourage consideration of family involvement in care. This study compared REORDER to enhanced treatment as usual in a randomized design. Methods: Participants included 226 veterans with serious mental illness whose relatives had low rates of contact with treatment staff. REORDER involved up to three consumer sessions followed by up to three relative educational sessions if the consumer and relative consented. Individuals were assessed at baseline and six months later. Results: Eighty-five percent of the 111 randomly assigned REORDER participants attended at least one REORDER consumer session; of those, 59% had at least one family session. REORDER participants had significantly reduced paranoid ideation and increased recovery at follow-up. Conclusions: Participation in REORDER led to marked increases in family participation and improved consumer outcomes.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2013 · Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this chapter, we reviewed six psychosocial rehabilitation interventions and two psychotherapies commonly used in the treatment of schizophrenia. For psychosocial rehabilitation approaches, we examined skills training, assertive community treatment, supported employment, cognitive remediation, social cognition training, and peer-implemented services. For psychotherapy approaches, we examined family-based therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy. For each approach, we provide background information on its development, a description of the primary methods used in delivering the intervention/therapy, results on efficacy, and a brief summary with future directions. We conclude this chapter by summarizing the current state of psychosocial rehabilitation and psychotherapy treatments covered, and discuss implementation and dissemination issues. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York. All rights reserved.
    No preview · Chapter · Feb 2014
Show more