Article

In Vitro Activity of a New Oral Glucan Synthase Inhibitor (MK-3118) Tested against Aspergillus spp. by CLSI and EUCAST Broth Microdilution Methods

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA 52317, USA.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (Impact Factor: 4.48). 12/2012; 57(2). DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01588-12
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT

MK-3118, a glucan synthase inhibitor derived from enfumafungin, and comparator agents were tested against 71 Aspergillus spp., including itraconazole-resistant strains (MIC, ≥4 μg/ml), using CLSI and EUCAST reference broth microdilution methods.
The CLSI 90% minimum effective concentration (MEC90)/MIC90 values (μg/ml) for MK-3118, amphotericin B, and caspofungin, respectively, were as follows: 0.12, 2, and 0.03 for Aspergillus flavus species complex (SC); 0.25, 2, and 0.06 for Aspergillus fumigatus SC; 0.12, 2, and 0.06 for Aspergillus terreus SC; and 0.06, 1, and 0.03 for Aspergillus niger SC. Essential agreement between the values found by CLSI and EUCAST (±2 log2 dilution steps) was 94.3%. MK-3118 was determined to be a potent agent regardless of the in vitro method applied, with excellent activity against contemporary wild-type and itraconazole-resistant strains of Aspergillus spp.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michael Pfaller, Nov 16, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Candida and Aspergillus species are important causes of opportunistic infection in an ever-growing number of vulnerable patients, and these infections are associated with high mortality. This has partly been attributed to the emerging resistance of pathogenic fungi to antifungal therapy, which potentially compromises the management of infected patients. Multi-azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus is a current health problem, as well as is the co-resistance of Candida glabrata to both azoles and echinocandins. In most cases, negative clinical consequences of reduced in vitro fungal susceptibility to azoles and/or echinocandins can be traced to acquisition of particular resistance mechanisms. While strategies using antifungal combinations or adjunctive agents that maximize the efficacy of existing antifungals may limit treatment failures, new therapeutic approaches, including antifungal agents with novel mechanisms of action, are urgent. In the meantime, more efforts should be devoted to close monitoring of antifungal resistance and its evolution in the clinical setting.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2013 · Current Fungal Infection Reports
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) pose significant morbidity and are often life-threatening to many high-risk patients. Timely diagnosis and treatment of these infections with optimal therapy is imperative. Areas covered: Advances have been made in diagnostic biomarkers such as peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization, β-D-glucan and galactomannan, although more research is needed in this area to assist with both diagnosis and monitoring for improvement of IFI management. Novel antifungal agents (azole antifungals and echinocandins) are being investigated that have activity against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. Optimizing the pharmacodynamics (PD) of our current antifungal therapies through such strategies as continuous infusion of amphotericin B and dose escalation of echinocandins and liposomal formulations of amphotericin B have also been investigated with mixed results. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) shows promise as evident from data with such agents as flucytosine, itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole. Expert opinion: The goal for the future of biomarkers in IFIs will be to have excellent sensitivity and specificity to ideally identify a particular fungus causing the infection or eliminate its existence to prevent unnecessary costs, resistance and antifungal usage. In addition, further developments of new antifungals are needed and judicious use of the current regimens needs to be optimized through antifungal PD properties and TDM.
    No preview · Article · Sep 2013 · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fungi have emerged worldwide as increasingly frequent causes of healthcare-associated infections. Invasive fungal infections can be life-threatening. However, the number of antifungal agents available and their use in therapy is very limited. Recently, a new family of specific fungal cell wall synthesis inhibitors has emerged as an alternative antifungal therapy and is gaining increasing relevance yearly. The cell wall is a multilayer dynamic structure, essential to the integrity and shape of the fungal cell, whose function is to counteract the osmotic forces that could otherwise produce fungal cell lysis. The cell wall is absent in nonfungal cells, therefore representing a useful target in discovering selective drugs for the treatment of fungal infections without causing toxicity in the host. Although fungi exhibit a considerable diversity in their cell wall structure, all present β(1,3)-, β(1,6)- and α(1,3)-glucans, chitin, and mannoproteins as their major cell wall components. Three different cell wall synthesis inhibitors of the lipopeptide family of echinocandins, named caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, are commercially available and new classes of cell wall synthesis inhibitors are emerging. This review provides an overview of what is so far known about the different classes of cell wall-affecting antifungal agents and their mechanism of action, offering new alternatives with clinical potential. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. All rights are reserved.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2013
Show more