Evidence-based treatment strategies for treatment-resistant bipolar depression: A systematic review

Department of Mood Disorders ECT Department, University Psychiatric Center, Catholic University Leuven, Campus Kortenberg, Kortenberg, Belgium Department of Elderly Psychiatry, GGZ inGeest/VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Psychiatry, General Hospital Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium.
Bipolar Disorders (Impact Factor: 4.97). 11/2012; 15(1). DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12026
Source: PubMed


Treatment resistance in bipolar depression is a common clinical problem that constitutes a major challenge for the treating clinician as there is a paucity of treatment options. The objective of this paper was to review the evidence for treatment options in treatment-resistant bipolar depression, as found in randomized controlled trials and with special attention to the definition and assessment of treatment resistance.

A Medline search (from database inception to May 2012) was performed using the search terms treatment resistance or treatment refractory, and bipolar depression or bipolar disorder, supplemented with 43 separate searches using the various pharmacologic agents or technical interventions as search terms.

Only seven studies met our inclusion criteria. These studies examined the effects of ketamine (n = 1), (ar)modafinil (n = 2), pramipexole (n = 1), lamotrigine (n = 1), inositol (n = 1), risperidone (n = 1), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (n = 2).

The available level I evidence for treatment strategies in resistant bipolar depression is extremely scarce, and although the response rates reported are reassuring, most of the strategies remain experimental. There is an urgent need for further study in homogeneous patient samples using a clear concept of treatment resistance.

Download full-text


Available from: A. Dols, Sep 18, 2014
  • Source
    • "epressants that are used commonly for the acute treatment of bipolar depression fails the requirements of the definition of " depression mood stabilizers " mainly because of their tendency to cause mood destabilization by inducing switches to mania or episode acceleration ( Post et al . , 1997 ; Henry et al . , 2001 ; Ketter and Calabrese , 2002 ; Sienaert et al . , 2013 ) . Lamotrigine possess the unique characteristic that differentiates it from the other mood stabilizers and anticonvulsants in its efficacy in bipolar disorder , as it exerts a positive effect on the corticolimbic network function , which is a resultant of abnormal activities of the circuits in bipolar depression ( Reid et al . , 2013 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The efficacy of lamotrigine in the treatment of focal epilepsies have already been reported in several case reports and open studies, which is thought to act by inhibiting glutamate release through voltage-sensitive sodium channels blockade and neuronal membrane stabilization. However, recent findings have also illustrated the importance of lamotrigine in alleviating the depressive symptoms of bipolar disorder, without causing mood destabilization or precipitating mania. Currently, no mood stabilizers are available having equal efficacy in the treatment of both mania and depression, two of which forms the extreme sides of the bipolar disorder. Lamotrigine, a well established anticonvulsant has received regulatory approval for the treatment and prevention of bipolar depression in more than 30 countries worldwide. Lamotrigine, acts through several molecular targets and overcomes the major limitation of other conventional antidepressants by stabilizing mood from "below baseline" thereby preventing switches to mania or episode acceleration, thus being effective for bipolar I disorder. Recent studies have also suggested that these observations could also be extended to patients with bipolar II disorder. Thus, lamotrigine may supposedly fulfill the unmet requirement for an effective depression mood stabilizer.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2015 · Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Source
    • "Mood disorders, such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD), are highly prevalent and debilitating conditions, associated with high suicidality rates, elevated treatment costs, and heavy social and economic burden [1]. The treatment of depressive episodes is associated with a 30–40% rate of nonresponse [2]. Few effective treatments are currently used and approved for resistant unipolar and bipolar depression. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is a novel, experimental therapeutic intervention, which combines therapeutic aspects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation, in order to achieve the efficacy of the former with the safety of the latter. MST might prove to be a valuable tool in the treatment of mood disorders, such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder. Our aim is to review current literature on MST. Methods. OVID and MEDLINE databases were used to systematically search for clinical studies on MST. The terms "magnetic seizure therapy," "depression," and "bipolar" were employed. Results. Out of 74 studies, 8 met eligibility criteria. There was considerable variability in the methods employed and samples sizes were small, limiting the generalization of the results. All studies focused on depressive episodes, but few included patients with bipolar disorder. The studies found reported significant antidepressant effects, with remission rates ranging from 30% to 40%. No significant cognitive side effects related to MST were found, with a better cognitive profile when compared to ECT. MST was effective in reducing depressive symptoms in mood disorders, with generally less side effects than ECT. No study focused on comparing MST to ECT on bipolar depression specifically.
    Full-text · Article · May 2015
  • Source
    • "Modafinil and its R-enantiomer armodafinil (ar/mod) are approved treatments for excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy, dayenight shift work sleep disorder, and obstructive sleep apnea (Nishino and Okuro, 2008). However, ar/ mod may have efficacy in other conditions such as bipolar depression (Sienaert et al., 2013), substance abuse (Mereu et al., 2013), and schizophrenia (Lindenmayer et al., 2013), as well. Modafinil increases the levels of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin in the prefrontal cortex (de Saint Hilaire et al., 2001); dopamine levels are also elevated in the nucleus accumbens (Volkow et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of modafinil or armodafinil (ar/mod) augmentation in schizophrenia. We searched PubMed, clinical trial registries, reference lists, and other sources for parallel group, placebo-controlled RCTs. Our primary outcome variable was the effect of ar/mod on negative symptom outcomes. Eight RCTs (pooled N = 372; median duration, 8 weeks) met our selection criteria. Ar/mod (200 mg/day) significantly attenuated negative symptom ratings (6 RCTs; N = 322; standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.26; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.04). This finding remained similar in all but one sensitivity analysis - when the only RCT in acutely ill patients was excluded, the outcome was no longer statistically significant (SMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.51 to 0.06). The absolute advantage for ar/mod was small: just 0.27 points on the PANSS-N (6 RCTs). Ar/mod attenuated total psychopathology ratings (7 RCTs; N = 342; SMD, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.02) but did not influence positive symptom ratings (5 RCTs; N = 302; mean difference, -0.58; 95% CI, -1.71 to 0.55). Although data were limited, cognition, fatigue, daytime drowsiness, adverse events, and drop out rates did not differ significantly between ar/mod and placebo groups. Fixed and random effects models yielded similar results. There was no heterogeneity in all but one analysis. Publication bias could not be tested. We conclude that ar/mod (200 mg/day) is safe and well tolerated in the short-term treatment of schizophrenia. Ar/mod reduces negative symptoms with a small effect size; the absolute advantage is also small, and the advantage disappears when chronically ill patients or those with high negative symptom burden are treated. Ar/mod does not benefit or worsen other symptom dimensions in schizophrenia.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Journal of Psychiatric Research
Show more