Do Intentions Really Predict Behavior? Self-Generated Validity Effects in Survey Research

Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States
Journal of Marketing (Impact Factor: 5.47). 04/2005; 69(2):1-14. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.


Studies of the relationship between purchase intentions and purchase behavior have ignored the possibility that the very act of measurement may inflate the association between intentions and behavior, a phenomenon called "self-generated validity." In this research, the authors develop a latent model of the reactive effects of measurement that is applicable to intentions, attitude, or satisfaction data, and they show that this model can be estimated with a two-stage procedure. In the first stage, the authors use data from surveyed consumers to predict the presurvey latent purchase intentions of both surveyed and nonsurveyed consumers. In the second stage, they compare the strength of the association between the presurvey latent intentions and the postsurvey behavior across both groups. The authors find large and reliable self-generated validity effects across three diverse large-scale field studies. On average, the correlation between latent intentions and purchase behavior is 58% greater among surveyed consumers than it is among similar nonsurveyed consumers. One study also shows that the reactive effect of the measurement of purchase intentions is entirely mediated by self-generated validity and not by social norms, intention modification, or other measurement effects that are independent of presurvey latent intentions.

Download full-text


Available from: Pierre Chandon

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: Do Intentions Really Predict Behavior? Self-Generated Validity Effects in Survey Research

181.3 KB

See full-text
    • "WOM is a powerful information source that consumers commonly view as more reliable, credible, and trustworthy than firm-initiated communications and thus can determine the prospects of any product (Allsop et al. 2007). Finally, although intentions are not always accurate predictors of future behavior, consumers tend to follow their purchase intentions (Chandon et al. 2005). Figure 1 presents the research model of the study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Consumer skepticism of corporate environmental activities is on the rise. Yet research on this timely, intriguing, and important topic is scarce for both academics and practitioners. Building on attribution theory, we develop and test a theoretically anchored model that examines how (1) attributions related to environmental initiatives are formed, (2) attributions trigger green skepticism, and (3) green skepticism influences important outcomes. The study findings reveal that consumers’ perceptions of industry norms, corporate social responsibility, and corporate history are important factors that explain why consumers assign different motives to corporate environmental actions. In addition, the results show that while intrinsic motives exert a strong negative effect on green skepticism, extrinsic motives have no discernible effect. Furthermore, the findings indicate that green skepticism prompts consumers to seek more information about the products, sparks negative word of mouth to friends and acquaintances, and forestalls purchase intentions. The study offers several implications for corporate and public policy makers and presents fruitful research directions.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2015 · Journal of Business Ethics
  • Source
    • "Most of the research in this area has dealt with questionnaire items, particularly intentions questions (e.g., " How likely is it that you will do X? " ) and selfprediction questions (e.g., " Do you predict that you will do X? " ), and several studies show that respondents' exposure to such items makes behavior related to the questions more likely to be carried out (Chandon et al., 2005; Williams et al., 2006). With regard to intention questions, one explanation is that when asked about intentions, pre-existing intentions become more accessible in memory (and non-existing intentions may be formed), and this leads to increased strength in respondents' intentions compared to when no intention question is asked (Chandon et al., 2005). In the next step, and given the influence of intentions on behavior, behavior is expected to be affected. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines if a mere request to a customer – within the frame of a service encounter – to engage in word-of-mouth (WOM) would have an impact on the customer's subsequent WOM activity. Although previous studies have not examined this issue, theoretical arguments do exist. And they point in different directions; some suggest a positive impact, while others suggest a negative impact. To explore the issue empirically, we carried out two studies (one survey-based study and one experiment). Both generated the same result: they indicate that merely asking customers to engage in WOM has a positive impact on customers' WOM activity. In addition, we found that receiving the request was not negatively associated with the customers' overall evaluations, such as customer satisfaction, which indicates that the potential for negative consequences of making the request seems to be low.
    Full-text · Article · Aug 2015 · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
  • Source
    • "It is interesting to note, however that only a small correlation was observed between reported SD consumption and intention to drink SD tomorrow, and no correlation was found between consumption and intention to consume SD in one year. In marketing, it is widely recognized that self-reported purchase intentions do not necessarily predict purchasing behavior [35]. These findings are inconsistent with the majority of health behavioral intent and consumption research [36] [37] suggesting further investigation is necessary to explain this finding. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Soft drinks, fruit juice and milk are the most common caloric-beverages consumed by adolescents and teens. We report the ten-year trends in the percentage of daily calories consumed in the form of caloric-beverages from a broad sample of fifth-grade students in the United States. This is a major area of concern related to dietary quality and body weight amongst children. The study was conducted from 2001-2011 through the Healthy Hearts for Kids (HH4K) online instructional program. A total of 17,559 students from 1,048 schools in 49 US states participated. Results reveal there were no changes across the ten-year period in reported fruit juice and milk consumption in the past week. There was a significant downward trend in soft drink consumption in the ten-year period. Juice consumption was positively correlated with soft drink and milk consumption in the past week. Soft drink consumption was positively correlated with milk consumption. The intent to drink two or more soft drinks tomorrow was significantly related to soft drink consumption in the last week and to expected soft drink consumption a year from now. The intent to drink two or more soft drinks in a day one year from now was not related to reported soft drink consumption in the last week. The intent to drink two or more soft drinks tomorrow was not correlated with juice consumption in the past week or with milk consumption in the past week. In conclusion, soft drink consumption declined, but there were no changes in consumption of milk and fruit juice. Soft drinks did not appear to displace either milk or fruit juice. These participants appear to be aware that soft drinks are a less healthy choice.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2015
Show more