ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract

There is a direct link between healthy mothers and healthy infants. Exercise and appropriate nutrition are important contributors to maternal physical and psychological health. The benefits and potential risks of exercise during pregnancy have gained even more attention, with a number of studies having been published after the 2002 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists guidelines. A review of the literature was conducted by using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to assess the literature regarding the benefits of exercise during pregnancy. The search revealed 219 publications, which the authors then narrowed to 125 publications. The purpose of this review is to briefly summarize the known benefits of exercise to the mother, fetus, and newborn.
Theme Issue: Exercise and Sports
Benefits of Exercise During Pregnancy
Heidi Prather, DO, Tracy Spitznagle, DPT, Devyani Hunt, MD
Abstract: There is a direct link between healthy mothers and healthy infants. Exercise and
appropriate nutrition are important contributors to maternal physical and psychological
health. The benefits and potential risks of exercise during pregnancy have gained even more
attention, with a number of studies having been published after the 2002 American College
of Obstetrics and Gynecologists guidelines. A review of the literature was conducted by
using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to assess the literature regarding the benefits of exercise
during pregnancy. The search revealed 219 publications, which the authors then narrowed
to 125 publications. The purpose of this review is to briefly summarize the known benefits
of exercise to the mother, fetus, and newborn.
PM R 2012;4:845-850
INTRODUCTION
The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists recommends that, during preg-
nancy, women should perform 30 minutes or more of moderate-intensity exercise on most,
if not all, days of the week [1]. Yet, many healthy pregnant women are either not advised of
the benefits of exercise or choose to not participate in activity as recommended by the
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists guidelines [2-4]. Since the 2002 publi-
cation of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists guidelines, multiple re-
searchers have reported the benefits of exercise, in a variety of formats, for the mother, fetus,
and child [5-37]. Charlesworth et al [38] reported that previously inactive and active
healthy women are at low risk for adverse fetal or maternal events if they participate in
routine physical activity during pregnancy. However, once pregnant, women generally tend
to decrease their activity levels [39,40]. Barriers to exercise reported by pregnant women
include lack of motivation, perceived lack of time due to family and work demands, desire
to postpone weight loss until after delivery, and pain with movement [39]. Thus, the means
to motivate women to exercise during pregnancy needs to be explored. Kwolek et al [41]
reported that, in a cohort of pregnant soldiers who exercised, it was the knowledge of the
benefits to the fetus that motivated them to exercise. To motivate healthy pregnant women
to exercise, health care providers should provide education regarding (1) the appropriate
type and amount of exercise that should be undertaken during pregnancy, and (2) the
benefits to the pregnant woman, the fetus, and the newborn infant. The purpose of this
review is to summarize the benefits of exercise during pregnancy to the mother, infant, and
child.
METHODS
The senior author (H.P.) conducted a search by using PubMed, Embase (Elsevier, New
York, NY), and Scopus (Elsevier) programs to identify studies with clinical relevance
regarding the effect of exercise during pregnancy. Only original studies and systematic
reviews were considered for review. The search revealed 219 publications. After a review of
abstracts and articles, the search was narrowed to 86 publications. These publications were
then grouped based on topic to include the effects of exercise on the following: maternal,
fetal, and infant health; maternal psychological well-being; and weight management. All of
the authors have research and clinical experience regarding musculoskeletal care (including
exercise recommendations) for women during pregnancy and post partum.
H.P. Section, Physical Medicine and Rehabil-
itation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Washington University School of Medicine,
One Barnes Plaza, Suite 11300, St Louis, MO
63110. Address correspondence to: H.P.;
e-mail: pratherh@wustl.edu
Disclosures related to this publication: none.
Disclosures outside this publication: board
membership (paid to institution) North Amer-
ican Spine Society; payment for lectures in-
cluding service on speakers bureaus (paid to
institution) A.T. Still University of Health Sci-
ences, Kirksville, MO; travel/accommodations/
meeting expenses, North American Spine Soci-
ety, American Academy of PM&R (PM&R senior
editor); travel expenses for travel for NASS BOD
meetings and PM&R SE meetings
T.S. Program in Physical Therapy, Washing-
ton University School of Medicine, St Louis,
MO
Disclosure: nothing to disclose
D.H. Section, Physical Medicine and Rehabil-
itation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Washington University School of Medicine, St
Louis, MO
Disclosure: nothing to disclose
PM&R © 2012 by the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
1934-1482/12/$36.00 Vol. 4, 845-850, November 2012
Printed in U.S.A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.07.012 845
TYPE OF EXERCISE
Aerobic exercise [5,7,9,11-13,15,21,24,27,28,34], progressive
resistive strengthening [8,10,17,23,25,27,32], stretching exer-
cises [36,37], yoga [6,30], and Qi [20] have all been reported to
be safe to perform when pregnant. The type of aerobic exercise
that has been found to be beneficial during pregnancy is quite
varied. Stationary bicycling, jogging, walking, stair climbing,
treadmill use, water exercise, swimming, and an aerobic dance
class have all been used. The dosage of the intervention (length
of participation, frequency, and duration) also can be quite
varied. Reports of length of participation in exercise ranges from
12 weeks [26,27,32,33] to span an entire pregnancy
[14,19,30,34,36]. The frequency of aerobic exercise participa-
tion is most commonly 3-5 times per week [30,32,34,36]. Yeo et
al [36] reported that the variation of frequency of exercise was
dependent on the phase of the pregnancy. The duration of
aerobic exercise can range from 15 minutes up to 150 minutes
per session. An aerobic exercise prescription of 60 minutes or
longer has been found to be safe for mother, fetus, and infant
[14,19,23,26,30,32-34,36]. The intensity of aerobic exercise
can be safely monitored by using self-pacing techniques [27,28]
or heart rate monitoring using 50%-75% of the age-predicted
maximum [11,25,28,32]. The safe use of progressive resistive
strength training in pregnancy has been reported in only a few
studies [8,10,17]. Progressive resistive strength training, al-
though commonly reported by pregnant women as part of their
exercise program [37], is often combined with aerobic exercises
[23,25-27,32]. Thus, it is difficult to make recommendations
regarding the appropriate dose and potential benefits of isolated
strength training during pregnancy. Dosage of stretching exer-
cises has similarly not been well investigated. Yeo et al [36] used
a 40-minute video that demonstrated comprehensive stretches
to be preformed 5 days per week.
BENEFITS OF EXERCISE: MATERNAL
Fitness
Maternal benefits from exercise during pregnancy include im-
proved cardiovascular function [11,24,25,29,42-45], a lower
risk for gestational diabetes in women who are obese or not
obese [17,46-48], improved strength [28] and lean muscle mass
[8], improved sense of well-being [7,20,26,28,30,34], and en-
hanced sleep [6,49]. In addition, reductions in bone density loss
[50] and physical discomfort [5-7,31] have been reported.
Specific cardiovascular function improvements due to aero-
bic exercise in pregnancy include decreased heart rate at rest and
during exercise [42,43,48] and higher stroke volumes [29,44],
increase in O
2
uptake at the anaerobic threshold [32], and
improved anaerobic ventilatory threshold [25]. Other positive
cardiovascular improvements are increased exercise duration
[12,45], increased peak power output [12], and enhanced fat
versus carbohydrate oxidation [11]. Interestingly, maximum
oxygen uptake VO
2 max
does not change in response to cycling,
swimming, or other forms of aerobic exercise during pregnancy
[51-57].
Besides aerobic exercise, other types of exercise have unique
outcomes that may facilitate motivating pregnant women to
exercise. In a single case report, progressive resistive strength
training across a pregnancy resulted in an increase in lean
muscle mass [8]. For women with gestational diabetes, strength
training or strength training combined with diet changes were
both related to a decreased need for insulin [10,17]. Unique
benefits of stretching exercises include a decreased incidence of
gestational hypertension and an increase in antioxidant markers
at the time of delivery [36,37]. Yoga and Qi, both exercise
interventions that combine some stretching with strengthening,
have been reported to increase quality of life scores in pregnant
women [20,30]. Water exercise has also been found to increase
quality of life scores [19,36] as well as reduce lower extremity
edema and decrease back pain [31]. An individualized exercise
program tailored to specific muscle impairments reduced low
back pain during pregnancy [27].
Weight Management
Weight gain during pregnancy is a natural and necessary pro-
cess. However, excessive gestational weight gain (EGWG) is
associated with maternal complications, including cesarean de-
livery, hypertension, preeclampsia, impaired glucose tolerance,
and gestational diabetes [58]. Studies have assessed the benefits
of exercise in pregnant women with normal weight, overweight,
and obesity with regard to gestational weight gain (GWG) and
EGWG.
Ruchat et al [59] randomized women with normal weight
at 16-20 weeks gestation to 1 of 3 groups: low-intensity
exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, or control. Total GWG
was higher in the control group compared with either exer-
cise group. EGWG was prevented in 70% and 77% of the
low- and moderate-intensity exercise groups, respectively.
The exercise groups retained less weight 2 months post
partum compared with controls. In another recent study, Hui
et al [60] compared physical activity and food intake over 2
months time during pregnancy in women who engaged in
group exercise, home exercise, and nutritional counseling
compared with controls. The intervention group had re-
duced calorie and fat intakes with higher reports of physical
activity (P.01) compared with controls. The prevalence of
EGWG was significantly reduced (P.01) in the interven-
tion group compared with controls. Haakstad and Bo[61]
studied pregnant women with normal weight and compared
a 12-week supervised exercise program with usual care. Only
women who attended 24 exercise sessions demonstrated
significantly less weight gain during pregnancy (P.006)
and less postpartum weight retention (P.01) compared
with controls. Phelan et al [62], in the Fit for Delivery Study,
followed up 401 pregnant women during their pregnancy
and 6 months post partum. Participants were randomized to
846 Prather et al BENEFITS OF EXERCISE DURING PREGNANCY
standard of care (n 200) or to the behavior intervention
group (n 201). The intervention consisted of a face-to-face
visit; weekly mailed printed material on appropriate weight
gain, healthy eating, and exercise; individual graphs of
weight; and telephone-based feedback. This minimal inter-
vention compared with the standard of care decreased the
percentage of women with normal weight who exceeded the
recommended GWG (40.2% compared with 52.1%; P
.003). Exceeding this limit has been associated with in-
creased difficulty in attaining ideal weight post partum, post-
partum depression, and decreased overall well-being. This
intervention consisted mostly of education, a relatively inex-
pensive intervention with a potential for high yield.
Results of studies that involved pregnant women who
were overweight and obese before pregnancy have also
shown the benefits of exercise and nutritional counseling. Sui
et al [63] published a systematic review to assess the harms
and benefits of exercise during pregnancy. Six randomized
control trials and 1 pseudorandomized controlled trial that
involved a total of 276 pregnant women found that 216 of the
women involved in an exercise program had lower gestational
weight compared with controls. Although these effects were
positive, the authors concluded that further studies are needed
to assess maternal and infant general health. In a randomized
control trial, Nascimento et al [64] found no difference in
general health between pregnant women who were obese and
overweight who participated in an exercise program starting
between 14 and 24 weeks gestation compared with controls.
However, the women who participated in the exercise program
gained significantly less weight (P.001) after entering the
program compared with controls. Furthermore, de Keyser et al
[65] studied the effect of a weight-gain restriction program
compared with usual care in pregnant women who were obese.
Comparisons included GWG, mean health care costs during
pregnancy, delivery, and the neonatal period. Women who
restricted weight gain to 4.6-9.5 kg had the lowest costs. How-
ever, the total costs, including the intervention, was higher in the
intervention group compared with usual care (P.025). Col-
lectively, these studies describe the benefits of exercise during
pregnancy for weight management in women who were normal
weight, overweight, and obese.
General Health and Psychological
Well-Being
During pregnancy, health care providers advocate for improved
generalized health and exercise. From 2001-2009, 22,604 preg-
nant women’s healthy behaviors were tracked [66]. Over 8
years, an improved percentage of healthy behaviors occurred. In
2001, 7.3% and, in 2009, 21.2% of pregnant women did not
smoke, did not consume alcoholic beverages, did engage in
leisure time exercise, and did receive an influenza vaccination
[66], which represents progress but is still a relatively small
percentage of the pregnant population that demonstrates
healthy behaviors. A study published in 2011 [67] found that
low-income African American pregnant women had a broad
definition of what constitutes exercise, which ranged from
household duties to running, which suggests that the definition
of exercise in the general public is not well defined, and, there-
fore, that women may inadvertently not participate in activities
that involve aerobic fitness. Further educational intervention is
necessary to improve healthy behaviors, including exercise, of
pregnant women.
The benefits of exercise and psychological well-being are
evident for women and extend into pregnancy. In general,
pregnancy is thought of as a time for emotional well-being for
many women. However, results of a meta-analysis of 21 studies
suggest that the mean prevalence rate for antenatal depression is
10.7%, with a range in the first trimester of 7.4% and in the third
trimester of 12.8% [68]. Researchers have linked exercise to
improved psychosocial well-being. Several studies [66,69-72]
have investigated the effects of a regular exercise program during
pregnancy. A systematic review completed in 2010 found broad
literature support of the antidepressant effects of exercise in the
general population, and a small number of observational studies
reported that regular physical activities improve self-esteem and
reduce the symptoms of anxiety and depression during preg-
nancy [71]. In 2012, Robledo-Colonia et al [70] published a
randomized control trial of exercise during pregnancy that in-
volved 80 nulliparous, pregnant women. The experimental
group completed a 3-month supervised exercise program,
whereas the control group continued usual activities with no
specific exercise program. After the 3-month intervention, the
women who exercised regularly had a statistically significant
decrease in depresssive symptoms compared with the control
group [70]. A randomized control trial of postpartum depres-
sion found that, after a 12-week exercise program of both
aerobic and strengthening exercises, there was no protective
effect on developing postpartum depression except for a sub-
group of women who did not previously exercise before preg-
nancy [72]. Another subgroup, pregnant adolescents, was stud-
ied by Koniak-Griffin [69]. A 6-week aerobic exercise program
in pregnant adolescent women from 14 to 20 years of age had a
significant decrease in depressive symptoms over time and in-
creased total self-esteem. The control group showed a significant
increase in physical discomforts associated with pregnancy [69].
Body image satisfaction during pregnancy is also an impor-
tant determinant of psychological well-being. Researchers
found that a healthy body image was a nonpharmacologic
strategy that could offer protective effects against depressive
symptoms during pregnancy [73]. Regular exercise and activity
may help to achieve this goal.
BENEFITS OF EXERCISE TO THE FETUS
Benefits to the fetus that may be used to motivate women to
exercise during pregnancy include decreased resting fetal heart
rate [11,13,74-76], improvement in the viability of the placenta
847PM&R Vol. 4, Iss. 11, 2012
[9,13,14,75], and increased amniotic fluid levels [31]. Ramierz-
Velez et al [77] reported an increase in endothelium-dependent
vasodilation. This effect of exercise has been postulated to pos-
sibly provide protection against preeclampsia [77]. Caution is
suggested at exercise intensities above 90% of heart rate maxi-
mum. In 1 study, fetal bradycardia and high umbilical artery
pulsatility occurred, which indicates that intense exercise could
potentially compromise fetal well-being [78].
BENEFITS OF EXERCISE TO THE INFANT
Children of women who exercise during their pregnancy have
lower birth weights [12,15,16,79], increased gestational ages
[80-82], and potentially improved neurodevelopment
[12,15,16,61]. Neonates of exercising mothers had a lower
percentage of body fat [12,15,16,81]. This lower weight at birth
was found to be correlated to changes in leptin levels late in
pregnancy, which indicates that the placental response to exer-
cise may be partially responsible for the lower weights [81].
Clapp [12] and Clapp et al [16] reported that neonates of
exercising mothers who were followed-up to 5 years of age
regained typical body fat and weight at 1 year of age but were
leaner at age 5 years. This indicates that, as children of exercising
mothers grow, they maintain a leaner body mass index com-
pared with children of nonexercising mothers. Recently, Mat-
tran et al [79] reported that weight and height-to-weight scores
of 2-year-old children born to active mothers were marginally
associated with late pregnancy activity levels.
With regard to neurodevelopment of the child, there is
still limited research available to use as a motivator for
pregnant women. Long-term neurodevelopmental benefits
for the infant due to maternal exercise during pregnancy are
still unclear. Recently, Apgar scores have been found to be
higher in neonates who are born to exercising mothers [61].
Clapp et al [16] reported improved orientation and the ability
to self-soothe in neonates as well as higher general intelli-
gence and oral language scores in 5 year olds.
MOTIVATION TO EXERCISE DURING
PREGNANCY
Once pregnant, women tend to decrease their activity levels
[39,40]. Barriers to exercise reported by pregnant women in-
clude lack of motivation, perceived lack of time due to family
and work demands, a desire to postpone weight loss until after
delivery, and pain with movement [39]. Motivation to exercise
during pregnancy can be enhanced if the benefits to the mother,
fetus, and child are explained, and if methods to lower the
barriers to exercise are used. Use of the available known benefits
of exercising during pregnancy should be used as well as explor-
ing appropriate educational methods. Reported methods to
improve the process of educating women and to increase their
receptivity to exercise include using an educational video [83],
providing greater support across the pregnancy to facilitate
exercise [84], and providing women with a means for self-
monitoring their activity level [85]. Key behavioral barriers
could be addressed with a simple telephone call [84], thus
providing support as gestation progresses. In addition, provid-
ing a pedometer or other form of activity log for objective means
of documenting activity [85] is a simple inexpensive tool that
could greatly improve the health of the mother, fetus, and child.
SUMMARY
There is considerable evidence that exercise during healthy
pregnancy has positive effects on the mother and fetus. Further-
more, there is some evidence that suggests positive effects on the
child. Women, therefore, should be encouraged to initiate or
continue exercise during a healthy pregnancy. Further research
is required to assess the short- and long-term effects of weight
management on maternal and infant health, the psychosocial
benefit of exercise during pregnancy, and the effect of exercise
during pregnancy on the neurodevelopment of children.
REFERENCES
1. ACOG Committee opinion. Exercise during pregnancy and the post-
partum period. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;77:79-81.
2. Doran F, Davis K. Factors that influence physical activity for pregnant
and postpartum women and implications for primary care. Aust J Prim
Health 2011;17:79-85.
3. Evenson KR, Wen F. Prevalence and correlates of objectively measured
physical activity and sedentary behavior among US pregnant women.
Prev Med 2011;53:39-43.
4. Ribeiro CP, Milanez H. Knowledge, attitude and practice of women in
Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil with respect to physical exercise in preg-
nancy: A descriptive study. Reprod Health 2011;8:31.
5. Artal R, O’Toole M. Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum
period. Br J Sports Med 2003;37:6-12; discussion 12.
6. Babbar S, Parks-Savage AC, Chauhan SP. Yoga during pregnancy: A
review. Am J Perinatol 2012;29:459-464.
7. Barakat R, Pelaez M, Montejo R, Luaces M, Zakynthinaki M. Exercise
during pregnancy improves maternal health perception: A randomized
controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:402 e1-e7.
8. Benton MJ, Swan PD, Whyte M. Progressive resistance training during
pregnancy: A case study. PM R 2010;2:681-684.
9. Bergmann A, Zygmunt M, Clapp JF III. Running throughout preg-
nancy: Effect on placental villous vascular volume and cell proliferation.
Placenta 2004;25:694-698.
10. Brankston GN, Mitchell BF, Ryan EA, Okun NB. Resistance exercise
decreases the need for insulin in overweight women with gestational
diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:188-193.
11. Brenner IK, Wolfe LA, Monga M, McGrath MJ. Physical conditioning
effects on fetal heart rate responses to graded maternal exercise. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 1999;31:792-799.
12. Clapp JF III. Morphometric and neurodevelopmental outcome at age
five years of the offspring of women who continued to exercise regu-
larly throughout pregnancy. J Pediatr 1996;129:856-863.
13. Clapp JF III, Kim H, Burciu B, Lopez B. Beginning regular exercise in
early pregnancy: Effect on fetoplacental growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2000;183:1484-1488.
14. Clapp JF III, Kim H, Burciu B, Schmidt S, Petry K, Lopez B. Continuing
regular exercise during pregnancy: Effect of exercise volume on feto-
placental growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:142-147.
848 Prather et al BENEFITS OF EXERCISE DURING PREGNANCY
15. Clapp JF III, Lopez B, Harcar-Sevcik R. Neonatal behavioral profile of
the offspring of women who continued to exercise regularly through-
out pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(Pt 1):91-94.
16. Clapp JF III, Simonian S, Lopez B, Appleby-Wineberg S, Harcar-Sevcik
R. The one-year morphometric and neurodevelopmental outcome of
the offspring of women who continued to exercise regularly through-
out pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:594-599.
17. de Barros MC, Lopes MA, Francisco RP, Sapienza AD, Zugaib M.
Resistance exercise and glycemic control in women with gestational
diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:556.e1–e6.
18. Evenson KR, Savitz DA, Huston SL. Leisure-time physical activity
among pregnant women in the US. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004;
18:400-407.
19. Granath AB, Hellgren MS, Gunnarsson RK. Water aerobics reduces sick
leave due to low back pain during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neo-
natal Nurs 2006;35:465-471.
20. Ji ES, Han HR. The effects of Qi exercise on maternal/fetal interaction
and maternal well-being during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal
Nurs 2010;39:310-318.
21. Juhl M, Kogevinas M, Andersen PK, Andersen AM, Olsen J. Is swim-
ming during pregnancy a safe exercise? Epidemiology 2010;21:253-
258.
22. Kalisiak B, Spitznagle T. What effect does an exercise program for
healthy pregnant women have on the mother, fetus, and child? PM R
2009;1:261-266.
23. Kardel KR. Effects of intense training during and after pregnancy in
top-level athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2005;15:79-86.
24. Marquez-Sterling S, Perry AC, Kaplan TA, Halberstein RA, Signorile JF.
Physical and psychological changes with vigorous exercise in sedentary
primigravidae. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:58-62.
25. McAuley SE, Jensen D, McGrath MJ, Wolfe LA. Effects of human
pregnancy and aerobic conditioning on alveolar gas exchange during
exercise. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2005;83:625-633.
26. Montoya Arizabaleta AV, Orozco Buitrago L, Aguilar de Plata AC,
Mosquera Escudero M, Ramirez-Velez R. Aerobic exercise during preg-
nancy improves health-related quality of life: A randomised trial. J
Physiother 2010;56:253-258.
27. Morkved S, Salvesen KA, Schei B, Lydersen S, Bo K. Does group
training during pregnancy prevent lumbopelvic pain? A randomized
clinical trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:276-282.
28. Ohtake PJ, Wolfe LA. Physical conditioning attenuates respiratory
responses to steady-state exercise in late gestation. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 1998;30:17-27.
29. O’Toole ML. Physiologic aspects of exercise in pregnancy. Clin Obstet
Gynecol 2003;46:379-389.
30. Rakhshani A, Maharana S, Raghuram N, Nagendra HR, Venkatram P.
Effects of integrated yoga on quality of life and interpersonal relation-
ship of pregnant women. Qual Life Res 2010;19:1447-1455.
31. San Juan Dertkigil M, Cecatti JG, Sarno MA, Cavalcante SR, Marussi EF.
Variation in the amniotic fluid index following moderate physical
activity in water during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;
86:547-552.
32. Santos IA, Stein R, Fuchs SC, et al. Aerobic exercise and submaximal
functional capacity in overweight pregnant women: A randomized trial.
Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:243-249.
33. Stafne SN, Salvesen KA, Romundstad PR, Eggebo TM, Carlsen SM,
Morkved S. Regular exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational
diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:29-
36.
34. Vallim AL, Osis MJ, Cecatti JG, Baciuk EP, Silveira C, Cavalcante SR.
Water exercises and quality of life during pregnancy. Reprod Health
2011;8:14.
35. Vladutiu CJ, Evenson KR, Marshall SW. Physical activity and injuries
during pregnancy. J Phys Act Health 2010;7:761-769.
36. Yeo S, Davidge S, Ronis DL, Antonakos CL, Hayashi R, O’Leary S. A
comparison of walking versus stretching exercises to reduce the inci-
dence of preeclampsia: A randomized clinical trial. Hypertens Preg-
nancy 2008;27:113-130.
37. Yeo S. Prenatal stretching exercise and autonomic responses: Prelimi-
nary data and a model for reducing preeclampsia. J Nurs Scholarsh
2010;42:113-121.
38. Charlesworth S, Foulds HJ, Burr JF, Bredin SS. Evidence-based risk
assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: Preg-
nancy (1) (1) This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this
Special Issue, entitled Evidence-based risk assessment and recommen-
dations for physical activity clearance, and has undergone the Journal’s
usual peer review process. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2011;36(Suppl
1):S33-S48.
39. Gaston A, Cramp A. Exercise during pregnancy: A review of patterns
and determinants. J Sci Med Sport 2011;14:299-305.
40. Weir Z, Bush J, Robson SC, McParlin C, Rankin J, Bell R. Physical
activity in pregnancy: A qualitative study of the beliefs of overweight
and obese pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10:18.
41. Kwolek LA, Berry-Caban CS, Thomas SF. Pregnant soldiers’ participa-
tion in physical training: A descriptive study. Mil Med 2011;176:926-
931.
42. Fortner RT, Pekow PS, Whitcomb BW, Sievert LL, Markenson G,
Chasan-Taber L. Physical activity and hypertensive disorders of preg-
nancy among Hispanic women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:639-
646.
43. Martin CL, Brunner Huber LR. Physical activity and hypertensive
complications during pregnancy: Findings from 2004 to 2006 North
Carolina Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Birth 2010;
37:202-210.
44. Pivarnik JM, Ayres NA, Mauer MB, Cotton DB, Kirshon B, Dildy GA.
Effects of maternal aerobic fitness on cardiorespiratory responses to
exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993;25:993-998.
45. Szymanski LM, Satin AJ. Exercise during pregnancy: Fetal responses to
current public health guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:603-610.
46. Gradmark A, Pomeroy J, Renstrom F, et al. Physical activity, sedentary
behaviors, and estimated insulin sensitivity and secretion in pregnant
and non-pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:44.
47. Liu JH, Mayer-Davis EJ, Pate RR, Gallagher AE, Bacon JL. Physical
activity during pregnancy is associated with reduced fasting insulin:
The Pilot Pregnancy and Active Living Study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal
Med 2010;23:1249-1252.
48. Tobias DK, Zhang C, van Dam RM, Bowers K, Hu FB. Physical activity
before and during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A
meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2011;34:223-229.
49. Borodulin K, Evenson KR, Monda K, Wen F, Herring AH, Dole N.
Physical activity and sleep among pregnant women. Paediatr Perinat
Epidemiol 2010;24:45-52.
50. To WW, Wong MW. Bone mineral density changes during pregnancy
in actively exercising women as measured by quantitative ultrasound.
Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:357-363.
51. Clapp JF III, Capeless E. The VO
2max
of recreational athletes before and
after pregnancy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:1128-1133.
52. Heenan AP, Wolfe LA, Davies GA. Maximal exercise testing in late
gestation: Maternal responses. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:127-134.
53. Lotgering FK, Struijk PC, van Doorn MB, Wallenburg HC. Errors in
predicting maximal oxygen consumption in pregnant women. J Appl
Physiol 1992;72:562-567.
54. Lotgering FK, van Doorn MB, Struijk PC, Pool J, Wallenburg HC.
Maximal aerobic exercise in pregnant women: Heart rate, O
2
consump-
tion, CO
2
production, and ventilation. J Appl Physiol 1991;70:1016-
1023.
55. Sady SP, Carpenter MW, Sady MA, et al. Prediction of VO2max during
cycle exercise in pregnant women. J Appl Physiol 1988;65:657-661.
849PM&R Vol. 4, Iss. 11, 2012
56. Sady SP, Carpenter MW, Thompson PD, Sady MA, Haydon B, Coustan
DR. Cardiovascular response to cycle exercise during and after preg-
nancy. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:336-341.
57. Spinnewijn WE, Wallenburg HC, Struijk PC, Lotgering FK. Peak
ventilatory responses during cycling and swimming in pregnant and
nonpregnant women. J Appl Physiol 1996;81:738-742.
58. Chasan-Taber L. Physical activity and dietary behaviors associated with
weight gain and impaired glucose tolerance among pregnant Latinas.
Adv Nutr 2012;3:108-118.
59. Ruchat SM, Davenport MH, Giroux I, et al. Nutrition and exercise
reduce excessive weight gain in normal-weight pregnant women. Med
Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:1419-1426.
60. Hui A, Back L, Ludwig S, et al. Lifestyle intervention on diet and
exercise reduced excessive gestational weight gain in pregnant women
under a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;119:
70-77.
61. Haakstad LA, Bo K. Exercise in pregnant women and birth weight: A
randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:66.
62. Phelan S, Phipps MG, Abrams B, Darroch F, Schaffner A, Wing RR.
Randomized trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent excessive
gestational weight gain: The Fit for Delivery Study. Am J Clin Nutr
2011;93:772-779.
63. Sui Z, Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Antenatal exercise to improve outcomes in
overweight or obese women: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand 2012;91:538-545.
64. Nascimento SL, Surita FG, Parpinelli MA, Siani S, Pinto e Silva JL. The
effect of an antenatal physical exercise programme on maternal/perina-
tal outcomes and quality of life in overweight and obese pregnant
women: A randomised clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:
1455-1463.
65. de Keyser N, Josefsson A, Monfils WG, et al. Total cost comparison of
standard antenatal care with a weight gain restriction programme for
obese pregnant women. Public Health 2011;125:311-317.
66. Zhao G, Ford ES, Tsai J, et al. Trends in health-related behavioral risk
factors among pregnant women in the United States: 2001-2009. J
Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012;21:255-263.
67. Krans EE, Chang JC. Low-income African American women’s beliefs
regarding exercise during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:
1180-1187.
68. Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson TR. Prevalence
of depression during pregnancy: Systematic review. Obstet Gynecol
2004;103:698-709.
69. Koniak-Griffin D. Aerobic exercise, psychological well-being, and
physical discomforts during adolescent pregnancy. Res Nurs Health
1994;17:253-263.
70. Robledo-Colonia AF, Sandoval-Restrepo N, Mosquera-Valderrama YF,
Escobar-Hurtado C, Ramirez-Velez R. Aerobic exercise training during
pregnancy reduces depressive symptoms in nulliparous women: A
randomised trial. J Physiother 2012;58:9-15.
71. Shivakumar G, Brandon AR, Snell PG, et al. Antenatal depression: A
rationale for studying exercise. Depress Anxiety 2011;28:234-242.
72. Songoygard KM, Stafne SN, Evensen KA, Salvesen KA, Vik T, Morkved
S. Does exercise during pregnancy prevent postnatal depression? A
randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91:62-
67.
73. Rauff EL, Downs DS. Mediating effects of body image satisfaction on
exercise behavior, depressive symptoms, and gestational weight gain in
pregnancy. Ann Behav Med 2011;42:381-390.
74. Gustafson KM, May LE, Yeh HW, Million SK, Allen JJ. Fetal cardiac
autonomic control during breathing and non-breathing epochs: The
effect of maternal exercise. Early Hum Dev 2012;88:539-546.
75. May LE, Glaros A, Yeh HW, Clapp JF III, Gustafson KM. Aerobic
exercise during pregnancy influences fetal cardiac autonomic control of
heart rate and heart rate variability. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:213-217.
76. May LE, Suminski RR, Langaker MD, Yeh HW, Gustafson KM. Regular
maternal exercise dose and fetal heart outcome. Med Sci Sports Exerc
2012;44:1252-1258.
77. Ramirez-Velez R, Aguilar de Plata AC, Escudero MM, et al. Influence of
regular aerobic exercise on endothelium-dependent vasodilation and
cardiorespiratory fitness in pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res
2011;37:1601-1608.
78. Salvesen KA, Hem E, Sundgot-Borgen J. Fetal wellbeing may be com-
promised during strenuous exercise among pregnant elite athletes. Br J
Sports Med 2012;46:279-283.
79. Mattran K, Mudd LM, Rudey RA, Kelly JS. Leisure-time physical
activity during pregnancy and offspring size at 18 to 24 months. J Phys
Act Health 2011;8:655-662.
80. Gollenberg AL, Pekow P, Bertone-Johnson ER, Freedson PS, Marken-
son G, Chasan-Taber L. Physical activity and risk of small-for-gesta-
tional-age birth among predominantly Puerto Rican women. Matern
Child Health J 2011;15:49-59.
81. Hopkins SA, Baldi JC, Cutfield WS, McCowan L, Hofman PL. Effects of
exercise training on maternal hormonal changes in pregnancy. Clin
Endocrinol (Oxf) 2011;74:495-500.
82. Owe KM, Nystad W, Skjaerven R, Stigum H, Bo K. Exercise during
pregnancy and the gestational age distribution: A cohort study. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 2012;44:1067-1074.
83. Jackson RA, Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Gerbert B. Improving diet and
exercise in pregnancy with Video Doctor counseling: A randomized
trial. Patient Educ Couns 2011;83:203-209.
84. Lewis BA, Martinson BC, Sherwood NE, Avery MD. A pilot study
evaluating a telephone-based exercise intervention for pregnant and
postpartum women. J Midwifery Womens Health 2011;56:127-131.
85. Renault K, Norgaard K, Andreasen KR, Secher NJ, Nilas L. Physical
activity during pregnancy in obese and normal-weight women as
assessed by pedometer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:956-961.
This CME activity is designated for 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ and
can be completed online at me.aapmr.org. Log on to www.me.aapmr.org,
go to Lifelong Learning (CME) and select Journal-based CME from the
drop down menu. This activity is FREE to AAPM&R members and $25 for
non-members.
CME Question
An aerobic exercise prescription safe to perform when pregnant includes the following EXCEPT:
a. length to span an entire pregnancy
b. frequency of 3-5 times per week
c. 60 minutes or greater per session
d. heart rate of 85% of age predicted maximum
Answer online at me.aapmr.org
850 Prather et al BENEFITS OF EXERCISE DURING PREGNANCY
... Housework was also frequently reported as a form of physical activity (Phiri et al., 2024b;Chanda et al., 2023;Nascimento et al., 2015). In more developed settings, swimming and prenatal yoga classes were popular choices (Prather et al., 2012). A study in Nigeria by Mbada et al., (2014) found that walking (67.2%) and sitting-to-standing exercises (58.6%) were the most commonly practiced exercises. ...
... However, informal sources such as television, friends, and family also play a significant role (Kambole et al., 2022). In some settings, particularly in more developed countries, the internet and social media are emerging as important sources of information (Prather et al., 2012). This diversity of information sources highlights the need for consistent and accurate messaging across different platforms. ...
... This diversity of information sources highlights the need for consistent and accurate messaging across different platforms. Prather et al., (2012 Recommendations for Practice Based on the findings, several recommendations can be made for improving exercise knowledge and practice during pregnancy. Firstly, exercise counselling should be incorporated into routine antenatal care (Chanda et al., 2023;Nascimento et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: This mini-review synthesizes current research on exercise knowledge and practices among pregnant women, with a focus on low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Key Findings: Recent studies indicate a generally positive attitude towards exercise during pregnancy across various cultural contexts. Walking and housework emerge as the most common forms of physical activity among pregnant women in these settings. Influencing Factors: The review explores factors influencing exercise knowledge and practice, including education level, parity, socioeconomic status, and cultural beliefs. It also examines the sources of information pregnant women rely on for exercise guidance. Identified Needs: Despite growing awareness, there remains a need for more specific, culturally appropriate guidance on safe and beneficial exercises during pregnancy. Recommendations: The review concludes with recommendations for healthcare providers and policymakers, emphasizing the importance of incorporating exercise counseling into routine antenatal care and tailoring interventions to local contexts. Conclusion and Future Directions: This comprehensive overview highlights the potential for improving maternal and fetal health outcomes through appropriate physical activity during pregnancy, while also identifying areas for future research.
... International organizations recommend that all women without contraindications perform regular PA during pregnancy and postpartum, corresponding to at least 150 min of moderate-intensity aerobic PA per week [16,18,19]. The benefits associated with PA during pregnancy include improvements in cardiovascular function, a sense of well-being and sleep quality [20], a reduction in the risk of excessive weight gain, gestational diabetes [16], pre-eclampsia, varicose veins, thrombosis and low back pain [21]. It also reduces levels of fatigue, stress, anxiety and depression and has a positive impact on the mother's quality of life after giving birth [3,20,21]. ...
... The benefits associated with PA during pregnancy include improvements in cardiovascular function, a sense of well-being and sleep quality [20], a reduction in the risk of excessive weight gain, gestational diabetes [16], pre-eclampsia, varicose veins, thrombosis and low back pain [21]. It also reduces levels of fatigue, stress, anxiety and depression and has a positive impact on the mother's quality of life after giving birth [3,20,21]. ...
... Some authors have evaluated the impact of PA on the lives of pregnant women and the positive effects on the mother's well-being and quality of life, indicating that regular practice reduces fatigue and negative feelings, as well as providing greater satisfaction with health [3,20,21]. However, to date, the effect that this intervention could have on the quality of life of overweight or obese pregnant women is unknown. ...
Article
Full-text available
There is evidence that the quality of life and mental health of pregnant women change during pregnancy. To evaluate the impact of physical activity on the quality of life and mental health of pregnant women with obesity or overweight, a systematic review was performed using six electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane (CENTRAL), ScienceDirect, Scielo, BVS and PEDro). In total, 205 articles were collected, and after screening in accordance with the PRISMA declaration, six randomized clinical trials were selected. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool and a narrative synthesis of the results was performed. Physical activity interventions did not demonstrate statistically significant results on the quality of life and mental health of pregnant women with obesity or overweight. The effects of physical activity during pregnancy for women with obesity or overweight are varied due to the diversity of interventions implemented. Nonetheless, a discernible positive association emerges between stringent adherence to the prescribed physical activity regimen and enhanced physical well-being, weight management, and heightened aerobic capacity. In order to ascertain more definitive conclusions, rigorous clinical trials are needed that take into account the heterogeneity of interventions and ensure adequate adherence to the protocol.
... 3 It is also important to prevent pregnancyrelated complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, gestational weight gain and improved maternal fitness and well-being, mood stability, decreased musculoskeletal discomfort and lower limb edema. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Not only for mothers it also benefits the fetus including decreased resting fetal heart rate, increased amniotic fluid level, improvement to the viability of the placenta, early neurobehavioral maturation and stress tolerance. 4,11,12 Additionally, it lowers the incidence of operative delivery and prematurity. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Regular exercise during pregnancy improves fetal and mother outcomes unless contraindicated. Despite being generally safe and beneficial, non-participation in prenatal activity is relatively common among most of the Asian countries due to multiple reasons. In India, findings related to maternal physical activity and its determinant are scant. Objective The objective of this study is to assess the physical activity level and associated factors among pregnant women attending maternal healthcare services in Dakshina Kannada District in India. Method A multi-center community-based cross-sectional study was conducted recruiting 424 pregnant women attending the maternal healthcare facilities at four taluks of Dakshina Kannada district in Karnataka state, India. A structured questionnaire that collected information on socio-demographic, and maternal characteristics was used and the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire tool was used to determine the physical activity during pregnancy. Logistic regression model was used to determine the predictor variables. Results The prevalence of physical inactivity was 40.33%. Physical activity is favorable among pregnant women aged between 25 to 29 years, residing in an urban locality, diploma or graduation and being housewife. Determinants of physical inactivity during pregnancy were sedentary occupation (AOR 7.22, 95% CI 2.2, 23.4), low family income (AOR 3.16, 95% CI 1.414, 7.054), having one child (AOR 5.4, 95% CI 1.3, 22.2), during 2nd trimester (AOR 2.513, 95% CI 1.5, 4.23) and self-reported lack of time (AOR 2.884, 95% CI 1.410, 5.901). Conclusion and recommendation A moderate proportion of pregnant women reported physical inactivity during pregnancy in the Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka. Physical inactivity was associated with sedentary employment, low income, number of children, trimester, and time constraints. Measures should be undertaken to promote the importance of recommended levels of physical activity, enhance access, and support system targeting pregnant women.
... Exercise during pregnancy is not only beneficial for pregnant mothers, but there is also evidence of infant benefits. These benefits include but are not limited to lower birth weight, decreased risk of prematurity, and better newborn neurodevelopmental aspects [24]. These results-which align with the literature-directly impact women's and newborns' health. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and Objective: This study aimed to explore the impact of physical activity on depression, anxiety, and stress among pregnant women in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women attending randomly selected prenatal clinics in primary healthcare hospitals in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. The calculated sample size was 350. Data were collected conveniently through a semi-structured questionnaire covering demographic details, pregnancy-related characteristics, physical activity assessed using the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ), and mental health parameters evaluated by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). The statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis rank sum tests, with significance levels set at p < 0.05. Results: The study involved 406 pregnant females. Nearly a third (31%) had a family history of depression, anxiety, or distress. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress was 62.6%, 68.7%, and 38.4%, respectively. The mean sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous, and total energy expenditures were 1.512, 24.35, 22.32, 4.84, and 53.02 metabolic equivalent tasks/day. Anxious females exhibited higher light activity (median 24, p = 0.033), while stressed ones showed higher light (median 25, p = 0.039), moderate (median 20, p < 0.001), and vigorous activity (median 3, p < 0.001). A significant association was observed between total energy expenditure and stress levels (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of physical activity in managing depression, anxiety, and stress among pregnant women in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. The findings suggest a need for tailored interventions to promote physical activity to improve mental well-being during pregnancy.
... Οι πρώτες συντηρητικές οδηγίες σχετικά με την άσκηση κατά τη διάρκεια της εγκυμοσύνης, δημοσιεύθηκαν από τον Αμερικάνικο Κολλέγιο Μαιευτικής και Γυναικολογίας το 1985 (Hammer, Perkins & Parr, 2000). Όλες οι μελέτες συγκλίνουν στην άποψη ότι η στοχευμένη και σωστά δομημένη άσκηση κατά τη διάρκεια της εγκυμοσύνης δρα θετικά τόσο στην εγκυμονούσα, όσο και στο έμβρυο (Prather, Spitznagle & Hunt, 2012). Μέσα από τη σωματική δραστηριότητα και την άσκηση, η γυναίκα αντιλαμβάνεται καλύτερα το σώμα της και τις αλλαγές που συμβαίνουν κατά τη διάρκεια της εγκυμοσύνης (Barakat et al., 2015). ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Tai Chi is a Chinese martial art that strengthens, stretches and balances the practitioner. It can be considered one of the best forms of exercise to improve balance and avoid falls in adults. The implementation of distance learning due to the pandemic has been a solution for many exercise programs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a mixed intervention program, with live and distance online Tai Chi practice on adult practitioners and its effect on dynamic balance. The sample of the study consisted of 19 practitioners (7 men & 12 women), with an average age of 53.9 ± 6.3 years, who participated in organized Tai Chi programs lasting 18 weeks, of which 9 weeks in live and 9 in online distance practice during the pandemic restrictive measures. The exercise frequency was 3 times / week lasting 90 minutes during live lessons while the online exercise duration was adjusted to 60 minutes. The program and the techniques of interaction with the participants were adapted during the online training. The Y-Test (Lower Quarter test) was used as an instrument for measuring the dynamic balance, which was performed at baseline and at follow up. The results of the present study showed that, after the application of t-test for dependent samples with significance index (p <0.05), a statistically significant difference (t = -3,663; p <0.05) was observed in the balance of the left foot and (t = -3,257; p <0.05) of the right foot between initial and final measurements. Tai Chi seems to be an effective method of improving balance in healthy adults. The activation of different muscle groups, the sequence of movements, the duration, the mind-body exercise may have a positive effect on the control of the posture of the body and the better sense of its position in space. Key words: Tai Chi, dynamic balance, mixed live and online exercise program Address for
... Regular exercise appears to lower the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia. (2),(Evidence also exists for the role of exercise in preventing incontinence during pregnancy and in the postpartum period (3). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Exercise is a bodily activity that improves or maintains physical fitness and overall health andwellness exercise during pregnancy is important and can help with some common discomforts of pregnancy andeven help prepare the pregnant women body for labor and delivery. (6)Objective: To study the pregnant women knowledge regarding exercise during pregnancy.Methods This is a descriptive cross sectional hospital base study which was carried out in military hospital inKhartoum state - Sudan, the data were collected by structured questionnaire and analyzed using the statisticalprogram for social sciences (SPSS) version 21Convenient sampling technique was used and the samples were 70pregnant women. The knowledge is categorized good (>60%), Moderate (50%-60%), poor (< 50%). A statisticalsignificance was considered at p-value of < 0.05.Result: The study revealed that the total mean knowledge about type of exercise was (95.7%), walking was themost common exercise among the study sample, 90.0 believe that exercise during pregnancy facilitates normaldelivery, and vaginal bleeding was considered as contraindication among (84.3%). factors influencing exerciseduring pregnancy (31.4%) said fear from complication is one of the factors influencing exercise during pregnancyThe overall knowledge of pregnant women about exercise during pregnancy was poor (36.3%:).Conclusion: Nursing education is the major tasks of nursing profession. The study concluded that there isinsufficient knowledge of pregnant women about exercise during pregnancy 52 (74.3%). Fallowed by no relationbetween educational level, age and knowledge about type of exercise, regarding benefits and contraindications toexercise during pregnancy (p. value < 0.05). so the study recommended to conduct more researches to enhance inincreasing mother’s knowledge about exercise during pregnancy.
... Numerous benefits of regular exercise during pregnancy include higher cardiorespiratory fitness, prevention of urinary incontinence, reduced symptoms of depression and maternal back pain, increased incidence of vaginal birth, and decreased incidence of excessive gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes and hypertension, preeclampsia, premature birth, cesarean birth and, lower birth weight (6)(7)(8). Additionally, exercise during pregnancy has potential benefits for fetal health, such as decreased resting fetal heart rate, improvement in the viability of the placenta, and increased amniotic fluid levels (9). ...
Article
Full-text available
It is known that physical activity (PA) in pregnancy is beneficial for both women and fetal health. For the optimal exercise prescription, healthcare professionals who are interested in obstetrics-gynecology should evaluate women carefully before making any exercise recommendations during pregnancy. If there aren't any contraindications, pregnant women should be encouraged to regular physical activity. This narrative review aimed to determine PA during pregnancy in Turkey. It was performed a literature search in the databases. A total of 29 original articles on PA during pregnancy in Turkey were included in this present study. Of these, 18 studies were considered for analysis. Two studies assessed PA levels in pregnancy objective/direct methods such as PA monitors and pedometers, and non-objective/indirect methods were used in all 18 studies. Regarding exercise types, the most preferred exercises during pregnancy were walking, breathing exercises, strengthening exercises, and stretching neck muscles. This narrative review revealed that the level of PA participation and the frequency of regular exercise during pregnancy in Turkey is low. More studies are needed to examine PA participation from various contexts during pregnancy in Turkey to guide interventions for improving maternal health.
Article
Uterine involution, the process of the uterus returning to its pre-pregnancy state, is a critical physiological event in the postpartum period. Suboptimal involution can lead to complications such as postpartum hemorrhage and prolonged lochia. Postpartum exercise has been suggested to promote uterine involution, but its efficacy in primary care settings remains under-explored. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a structured postpartum exercise program on uterine involution in women receiving care in primary care clinics. A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving postpartum women attending primary care clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group, receiving a structured postpartum exercise program, or a control group, receiving standard postpartum care. The primary outcome was the rate of uterine involution, assessed through serial measurements of fundal height. Secondary outcomes included duration of lochia, postpartum pain, and maternal quality of life. The study enrolled 120 women (60 per group). The intervention group demonstrated a significantly faster rate of uterine involution compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, the intervention group reported a shorter duration of lochia and improved quality of life scores. No significant differences were observed in postpartum pain between the groups. A structured postpartum exercise program implemented in primary care settings can effectively accelerate uterine involution and improve maternal well-being. These findings underscore the importance of integrating postpartum exercise into routine primary care for postpartum women.
Chapter
Low back pain, sciatica, and sacroiliac pain are common problems for pregnant women. Their etiology is multifactorial. Of key importance is the distinction between pain that is pathologic in nature and related to mechanical instability or neurologic compression as opposed to pain that is related to the increased mechanical demands on the low back and pelvis from the increase in body mass, expansion of body fluid volume, and ligamentous laxity associated with pregnancy. Regardless of its etiology, pain can become debilitating with difficulty performing activities of daily living and increased incidences of sick leave. It is also important to note that even the “normal” physiologic pain associated with pregnancy will commonly persist beyond 6 months’ postpartum. This chapter will explore the causes of back pain and the related symptoms of sciatica and sacroiliac pain, diagnosis, and treatment options, including the indications for surgical intervention.
Article
Full-text available
To evaluate whether bone mineral density (BMD) changes in women engaged in active exercises during pregnancy would be different from non-exercising women. Consecutive patients with singleton pregnancies who were engaged in active exercise training during pregnancy were prospectively recruited over a period of 6 months. Quantitative USG measurements of the os calcis BMD were performed at 14-20 weeks and at 36-38 weeks. These patients were compared to a control cohort of non-exercising low-risk women. A total of 24 physically active women undergoing active physical training of over 10 h per week at 20 weeks gestation and beyond (mean 13.1 h, SD 3.3) were compared to 94 non-exercising low-risk women. A marginal fall in BMD of 0.015 g/cm(2) (SD 0.034) was demonstrable from early to late gestation in the exercising women, which was significantly lower than that of non-exercising women (0.041 g/cm(2); SD 0.042; p = 0.005). Logistic regression models confirmed that active exercises in pregnancy were significantly associated with the absence of or less BMD loss in pregnancy. In women actively engaged in physical training during pregnancy, the physiological fall in BMD during pregnancy was apparently less compared to those who did not regularly exercise.
Article
Full-text available
Recommendations for physical activity during pregnancy have progressed significantly in the last 30 years and continue to evolve as an increasing body of scientific evidence becomes available. In addition, there is an increasing number of women who wish to either maintain physical fitness levels during the prenatal period or initiate exercise for a healthier lifestyle during pregnancy. As such, consistent evaluation of the risks associated with exercise during pregnancy is warranted for maternal and fetal well-being. The primary purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the scientific information available regarding maternal and fetal responses as it relates to the occurrence of adverse exercise-related events in pregnant women without contraindications to exercise. A systematic and evidence-based approach was used to analyze critically the level of evidence for risks associated with acute and chronic exercise during pregnancy in healthy pregnant women. All articles were screened according to standardized evaluation criteria developed by a panel of experts. A total of 74 investigations that involved 3766 pregnant women were included in the analysis. Of the 74 studies, only 35 studies documented the presence or absence of adverse events. The serious adverse event rate for these studies was 1.4 per 10 000 h of exercise. The adverse event rate increased to 6.8 per 10 000 h of exercise when including the occurrence of more mild events and exercise-related fetal bradycardia and tachycardia. Previously inactive or active women (without contraindications) are at a low risk for adverse fetal or maternal events if they participate in routine physical activity during pregnancy.
Article
Full-text available
Does supervised aerobic exercise during pregnancy reduce depressive symptoms in nulliparous women? Randomised trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors, and intention-to-treat analysis. 80 nulliparous, pregnant women attending for prenatal care at one of three tertiary hospitals in Cali, Colombia. The experimental group completed a 3-month supervised exercise program, commencing at 16 to 20 weeks of gestation. Each session included walking (10 min), aerobic exercise (30 min), stretching (10 min), and relaxation (10 min). The control group continued usual activities and performed no specific exercise. The primary outcome was symptoms of depression assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) at baseline and immediately after the 3-month intervention. 74 women completed the study. After the 3-month intervention, the experimental group reduced their depressive symptoms on the CES-D questionnaire by 4 points (95% CI 1 to 7) more than the control group. A supervised 3-month program of primarily aerobic exercise during pregnancy reduces depressive symptoms. NCT00872365.
Article
Full-text available
Pregnancy has been proposed as a critical period for the development of subsequent maternal overweight and/or obesity. Excessive gestational weight gain is, in turn, associated with maternal complications such as cesarean delivery, hypertension, preeclampsia, impaired glucose tolerance, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Although there is substantial evidence that targeting at-risk groups for type 2 diabetes prevention is effective if lifestyle changes are made, relatively little attention has been paid to the prevention of excessive gestational weight gain and impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy. Latinos are the largest minority group in the United States, with the highest birth and immigration rates of any minority group and are disproportionately affected by overweight and obesity. However, due to cultural factors, socioeconomic factors, and language barriers, Latinos have had limited access to public health interventions that promote healthy lifestyles. Therefore, the objective of this article is to review the scientific evidence regarding the association between physical activity, dietary behaviors, and gestational weight gain and impaired glucose tolerance among Latinas. A second objective is to discuss how lifestyle interventions including weight management through diet and exercise could be successful in reducing the risk of excessive gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes mellitus. Finally, recommendations are provided for future lifestyle intervention programs in this population with a focus on translation and dissemination of research findings.
Article
Full-text available
To evaluate acute fetal responses to individually prescribed exercise according to existing guidelines (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) in active and inactive pregnant women. Forty-five healthy pregnant women (15 nonexercisers, 15 regularly active, 15 highly active) were tested between 28 0/7 and 32 6/7 weeks of gestation. After a treadmill test to volitional fatigue, target heart rates were calculated for two subsequent 30-minute treadmill sessions: 1) moderate intensity (40-59% heart rate reserve); and 2) vigorous intensity (60-84%). All women performed the moderate test; only active women performed the vigorous test. Fetal well-being measures included umbilical artery Dopplers, fetal heart tracing and rate, and biophysical profile. Measures were obtained at rest and immediately postexercise. Groups were similar in age, body mass index, and gestational age. Maternal resting heart rate in the highly active group (61.6 ± 7.2 beats per minute [bpm]) was significantly lower than the nonexercise (79.0 ± 11.6 bpm) and regularly active (71.9 ± 7.4 bpm) groups (P<.001). Treadmill time was longer in highly active (22.3 ± 2.9 minutes) than regularly active (16.6 ± 3.4) and nonexercise (12.1 ± 3.6) groups (P<.001), reflecting higher fitness. With moderate exercise, all umbilical artery Doppler indices were similar pre-exercise and postexercise among groups. With vigorous exercise, Dopplers were similar in regularly and highly active women with statistically significant decreases postexercise (P<.05). The group × time interaction was not significant. Postexercise fetal heart tracings met criteria for reactivity within 20 minutes after all tests. Biophysical profile scores were reassuring. This study supports existing guidelines indicating pregnant women may begin or maintain an exercise program at moderate (inactive) or vigorous (active) intensities.
Article
Purpose: The present study examined the effects of exercise on physical and psychological variables in sedentary primigravidae (PRA). Methods: A total of nine women randomly assigned to an exercise (E) (mean age = 31.3 +/- 3.1 yr) and six subjects randomly assigned to a control (C) group (mean age = 27.8 +/- 3.1 yr) fulfilled all requirements for the study. Exercise included a variety of exercise activities performed to a target heart rate of 150-156 beats x min(-1), three times per week for 15 wk. Results: Results showed no significant differences between E and C groups in physical characteristics initially. A repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant group effect (P < 0.05) and a significant group by time interaction (P = 0.001) with the E group showing a significantly longer amount of time on the PWC150 test than the C group. There was no significant group, time, or group by time interaction for lactate accumulation. This occurred, despite the fact that the E group spent 56% longer on the PWC150 test and the C group spent 30% less time on the same test at the conclusion of the study. Finally, the E group in comparison to the C group showed more favorable improvements in several items related to health and well-being on the Body Cathexis Scale. There were no significant differences between E and C groups in any pregnancy outcome measures. All babies were delivered healthy at term. Conclusions: These data suggest that a vigorous exercise program can lead to significant improvements in aerobic fitness at similar lactate concentrations compared to a control group and can be well tolerated by low risk sedentary PRA without any deleterious effects occurring to herself or unborn child.
Article
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an exercise program of two different intensities, with nutritional control, on gestational weight gain (GWG), infant birth weight, and maternal weight retention at 2 months postpartum (2 mopp). Pregnant women (prepregnancy body mass index = 18.5-24.9 kg·m) were randomized at study entry (16-20 wk of gestation) to a low-intensity (LI, 30% HR reserve (HRR), n = 23) or moderate-intensity (MI, 70% HRR, n = 26) exercise program, with nutritional control. The exercise program consisted of walking sessions three to four times per week, gradually increasing exercise time from 25 to 40 min per session. Forty-five normal-weight women who did not participate in any structured exercise program during pregnancy and had singleton births were used as a historical control group. Total GWG was higher in the control group (18.3 ± 5.3 kg) compared with the LI (15.3 ± 2.9 kg, P = 0.01) and MI (14.9 ± 3.8 kg, P = 0.003) groups. During the intervention, GWG was similar in both intervention groups, with weekly rates of weight gain of 0.49 ± 0.1 and 0.47 ± 0.1 kg·wk in the LI and MI groups, respectively. Excessive GWG during the intervention was prevented in 70% of the women in the LI group and 77% of those in the MI group. Excessive GWG occurred before the intervention began. At 2 mopp, 18% and 28% of the women in the LI and MI groups, respectively, retained ≤2.0 kg compared with only 7% of those in the control group. Infant birth weight was not different between the groups. Results suggest that a prenatal nutrition and exercise program regardless of exercise intensity, reduced excessive GWG and decreased weight retention at 2 mopp in women of normal weight before pregnancy.