Global, 3-dimensional approach to natural rejuvenation: Part 1 - recommendations for volume restoration and the periocular area

Private Practice, Facial Plastic Surgery Centre, Cannes, France.
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (Impact Factor: 0.88). 12/2012; 11(4):279-89. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12003
Source: PubMed


New techniques and products have lead to a global approach for the treatment of signs of aging. However, there is little published literature on the procedures involved in this approach and currently no validated recommendations exist.
To provide a detailed, practical guide to midfacial volume restoration and rejuvenation of the periocular area based on expert consensus recommendations.
The expert committee took into account both volumetric and dynamic aspects of treatment, as well as benefits of treatment combinations, for example, combining OnabotulinumtoxinA with hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers and volumizers. An aging severity scale was established for each area, together with recommendations of appropriate products, doses, site, depth, and injection techniques, as well as rules to be respected.
The expert group concluded that volume restoration of the midface is the first essential step in the global approach because treatment for this area has the most significant positive impact. Firstly, it is important to restore the malar contour, as malar volume anchors the structure of the midface. Secondly, an assessment of the effects of malar enhancement on the appearance of the nasolabial folds and the nasojugal fold (tear trough) should be conducted because these aging signs may be decreased by malar enhancement. Finally, treatment for the nasolabial folds and periorbital area with HA should be performed when needed.
Practical guidance is provided for midfacial volume restoration and rejuvenation of the periocular area based on validated expert consensus recommendations. This will help esthetic facial physicians to achieve optimum outcomes.

33 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim of the study: Treatments with botulinum toxin in the forehead and periorbital areas may induce disappointing or even paradoxical results. Our study, focused on this area aimed at refining injection techniques by analyzing muscular balances and comparing the effect according to injection doses and topography. Methods: This experimental study has been carried out in the form of 2 session workshops, with volunteers duly informed of the study contents and giving their informed consent. It was conducted by physicians and surgeons members of SAMCEP* (Société Avancée de Médecine et Chirurgie Esthétique et Plastique). The botulinum toxin was onabotulinumtoxin A. Results were evaluated 15 days after treatment, in regard to global eyebrow position, eyebrow head and tail position; muscle interactions; lines above the eyebrow. Eleven case reports and their results are shown and discussed. Conclusion: Our study underlines two important insights: muscle balances and "border areas", between orbicularis oculi and corrugator, key features for eyebrow head, and between frontalis and orbicularis oculifor eyebrow tail.
    No preview · Article · Jan 2013 · Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The tear trough represents a main aesthetic characteristic of the aging process, which leads many patients to the wish for a safe and efficient rejuvenation method to fill their eye rings. The authors analyzed results and complication rates of two methods for hollow eye ring treatment. The authors used two methods on two patient collectives. Group A was treated using hyaluronic acid gel (Restylane; Q-Med, Uppsala, Sweden) and a reinforced 25-gauge Pix'l+ micro cannula. The authors developed a modified method for group B that included a combination of cooling of the periorbital area, no local anesthesia, preincision displacement of malar fat 10 mm below the orbital border, and postintervention corticoid therapy for 48 hours. Protocol B was associated with significantly lower complication rates. The authors also analyzed in how smoking, age, and skin properties might affect the clinical outcome. They found that choice of treatment and a history of blepharoplasty were significant predictive factors that correlated with complications. Tear trough treatment by hyalurostructure shows satisfying and efficient results with few complications. The revised technique used in group B combines multiple peri-interventional procedures including preinjection cooling of the periorbital area, preincision with displacement of the malar fat 10 mm below the orbital border, applying gentle back-and-forth movements while injecting, and oral corticosteroid therapy 48 hours after intervention. This technique makes hyalurostructure a competent and promising treatment for tear trough management. Therapeutic, III.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2013 · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Forehead and glabella rhytides are treated mostly with neurotoxins, although some practitioners prefer the concurrent use of fillers. It has been suggested that combination treatments can result in a better overall improvement. To compare the safety and effectiveness of treatment of forehead and glabellar lines with botulinum toxin A alone versus botulinum toxin A and filler. Split-face, randomized control trial. Twenty subjects with forehead/glabellar rhytide complex (static and dynamic creases) enrolled. Subjects were randomized and injected with botulinum toxin alone on one side of the forehead/glabella and hyaluronic acid filler followed by botulinum toxin on the other side. Blinded ratings were obtained to assess the effectiveness of treatment for static and dynamic rhytides, respectively, at 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up visits. Subjects performed a self-evaluation at the end of the study. Adverse events were recorded. Ratings of both treatments showed comparable efficacy, with 100% of subjects experiencing improvement from baseline regardless of treatment type at weeks 2, 6, and 12. Combination treatment produced longer-lasting results in dynamic forehead wrinkles, and greater static and dynamic wrinkle reduction in the glabella at week 24. Subject self-evaluations showed that both treatments were effective, with a nominal preference for combination treatment. Glabella and forehead lines can be effectively and safely reduced with neurotoxin alone as well as neurotoxin in combination with fillers. Combination treatment may provide a slightly better cumulative benefit and also increase the persistence of effect.
    No preview · Article · Dec 2013 · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Show more