Commentary on community-led total sanitation and human rights: Should the right to community-wide health be won at the cost of individual rights?

Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA E-mail: .
Journal of Water and Health (Impact Factor: 1.46). 12/2012; 10(4):499-503. DOI: 10.2166/wh.2012.205
Source: PubMed


The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) set out to halve the proportion of the population without access to basic sanitation between 1990 and 2015. The slow pace of progress has lead to a search for innovative responses, including social motivation approaches. One example of this type of approach is 'Community-led Total Sanitation' (CLTS). CLTS represents a major shift for sanitation projects and programmes in recognising the value of stopping open-defecation across the whole community, even when the individual toilets built are not necessarily wholly hygienic. However, recent publications on CLTS document a number of examples of practices which fail to meet basic ethical criteria and infringe human rights. There is a general theme in the CLTS literature encouraging the use of 'shame' or 'social stigma' as a tool for promoting behaviours. There are reported cases where monetary benefits to which individuals are otherwise entitled or the means to practice a livelihood are withheld to create pressures to conform. At the very extreme end of the scale, the investigation and punishment of violence has reportedly been denied if the crime occurred while defecating in the open, violating rights to a remedy and related access to justice. While social mobilisation in general, and CLTS in particular, have drastically and positively changed the way we think about sanitation, they neither need nor benefit from an association with any infringements of human rights.

28 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stakeholder participation is commonly promoted as a means to boost outcomes of sanitation improvement projects, in particular in developing countries. However, there is little research on when or how this participation should occur during the process of planning a sanitation system in order to maximize the effect. This study develops a framework for analysing participation levels of different stakeholders throughout a planning process and applies it to sanitation planning guidelines and case studies from Burkina Faso. This analysis highlights that, particularly during designing of system options and selecting among these options, there exist potential weaknesses regarding who participates and how that participation may influence what type of sanitation is implemented.
    No preview · Article · Jun 2014 · Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite investment stimulated by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), sanitation-related diseases, such as diarrhea, cholera and typhus, remain a leading cause of death of children under five in low-income countries. Prevention of diarrhea requires a combination of access to safe drinking water, good hygiene and adequate sanitation. The sanitation problem has proven to be particularly intractable, demonstrating the shortcomings of past efforts that have focused on increasing access to toilets. An alternative view positions the toilet within a service chain that extends to the final point of disposal or end-use of excreta-derived products. An integrated perspective that addresses improved planning, takes advantage of economic opportunities, incorporates specialized technology, and follows-up with behavior change could help to ensure not only access but also sustainable use, operation and maintenance of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014 · Environmental Science and Technology
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The global problem of access to improved sanitation and water management practices has been compounded by the gap existing between knowledge and practice as well as attitude.The aim of this study was to assess households’ knowledge and attitude on water, sanitation, and hygiene practices through a school health programme. Semistructured questionnaires, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and observation checklist were used to obtain information from 95 households which were systematically sampled. It was found that a school programme may not improve the gap between knowledge, attitude, and practice but may be good for future generations.This was found to be due to sociocultural issues which impede hygiene transformation.The implication is that health programmes must find innovative ways of bridging this gap in order to bring change in households through culture sensitive interventions.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2014
Show more