ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of chiropractic manual therapy for infants with unexplained crying behavior and if there was any effect of parental reporting bias. Infants with unexplained persistent crying (infant colic) were recruited between October 2007 and November 2009 at a chiropractic teaching clinic in the United Kingdom. Infants younger than 8 weeks were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: (i) infant treated, parent aware; (ii) infant treated, parent unaware; and (iii) infant not treated, parent unaware. The primary outcome was a daily crying diary completed by parents over a period of 10 days. Treatments were pragmatic, individualized to examination findings, and consisted of chiropractic manual therapy of the spine. Analysis of covariance was used to investigate differences between groups. One hundred four patients were randomized. In parents blinded to treatment allocation, using 2 or less hours of crying per day to determine a clinically significant improvement in crying time, the increased odds of improvement in treated infants compared with those not receiving treatment were statistically significant at day 8 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 8.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-45.0) and at day 10 (adjusted OR, 11.8; 95% CI, 2.1-68.3). The number needed to treat was 3. In contrast, the odds of improvement in treated infants were not significantly different in blinded compared with nonblinded parents (adjusted ORs, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.2-2.0] and 0.5 [95% CI, 0.1-1.6] at days 8 and 10, respectively). In this study, chiropractic manual therapy improved crying behavior in infants with colic. The findings showed that knowledge of treatment by the parent did not appear to contribute to the observed treatment effects in this study. Thus, it is unlikely that observed treatment effect is due to bias on the part of the reporting parent.
Content may be subject to copyright.
EFFICACY OF CHIROPRACTIC MANUAL THERAPY ON INFANT
COLIC:APRAGMATIC SINGLE-BLIND,RANDOMIZED
CONTROLLED TRIAL
Joyce E. Miller, BS, DC,
a
David Newell, PhD,
b
and Jennifer E. Bolton, PhD
c
ABSTRACT
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of chiropractic manual therapy for infants with
unexplained crying behavior and if there was any effect of parental reporting bias.
Methods: Infants with unexplained persistent crying (infant colic) were recruited between October 2007 and
November 2009 at a chiropractic teaching clinic in the United Kingdom. Infants younger than 8 weeks were
randomized to 1 of 3 groups: (i) infant treated, parent aware; (ii) infant treated, parent unaware; and (iii) infant not
treated, parent unaware. The primary outcome was a daily crying diary completed by parents over a period of 10 days.
Treatments were pragmatic, individualized to examination findings, and consisted of chiropractic manual therapy of
the spine. Analysis of covariance was used to investigate differences between groups.
Results: One hundred four patients were randomized. In parents blinded to treatment allocation, using 2 or less hours
of crying per day to determine a clinically significant improvement in crying time, the increased odds of improvement
in treated infants compared with those not receiving treatment were statistically significant at day 8 (adjusted odds
ratio [OR], 8.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-45.0) and at day 10 (adjusted OR, 11.8; 95% CI, 2.1-68.3). The
number needed to treat was 3. In contrast, the odds of improvement in treated infants were not significantly different in
blinded compared with nonblinded parents (adjusted ORs, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.2-2.0] and 0.5 [95% CI, 0.1-1.6] at days 8
and 10, respectively).
Conclusions: In this study, chiropractic manual therapy improved crying behavior in infants with colic. The findings
showed that knowledge of treatment by the parent did not appear to contribute to the observed treatment effects in this
study. Thus, it is unlikely that observed treatment effect is due to bias on the part of the reporting parent. (J Manipulative
Physiol Ther 2012;35:600-607)
Key Indexing Terms: Infant; Colic; Chiropractic; Musculoskeletal Manipulations
Excessive infant crying in otherwise healthy infants,
traditionally called infant colic, continues to be an
enigmatic condition with no known cause and no
known cure.
1-3
Aficting between 10% to 30% of all
infants and consuming signicant health care resources,
2
infant colic is a problem for parents and clinicians, both of
whom try a wide range of therapies with often disappoint-
ing results.
Despite decades of research, a clear pathogenesis has not
been elucidated. Notwithstanding, what is clear is that
underlying disease is rare in the excessively crying baby
4
and that half of those affected recover by 6 months of age,
5
with a small proportion at risk of injury
6
or long-term
developmental problems.
7-9
In an effort to help their child
with what appears to be a painful condition, some parents
choose complementary and alternative medicine (CAM),
including chiropractic manual therapy.
9-12
To date, several
randomized trials have been reported,
13-19
and although
these trials demonstrate some reduction in crying, weak-
nesses in study methodologies have compromised their
contribution to the evidence base.
20-23
A Danish study in 1999
13
showed manual therapy
resulted in a signicant reduction in crying in a 2-week trial
when compared with simethicone (known to have no effect
over placebo
3
) as a control. However, the parents were not
blind to treatment allocation, which could have biased their
reports of outcome. Similarly, a British study in 2006,
comparing manual therapy with no treatment, showed
signicant declines in crying in the treatment group, but
again, parents were not blind to the intervention received.
14
a
Associate Professor, Anglo-European College of Chiroprac-
tic, Bournemouth, UK.
b
Senior Lecturer, Biomedicine and Research, Anglo-European
College of Chiropractic, Bournemouth, UK.
c
Director of Research and Graduate Studies, Anglo-European
College of Chiropractic, Bournemouth, UK.
Submit requests for reprints to: Joyce E. Miller, BS, DC,
Associate Professor, 13-15 Parkwood Rd, Bournemouth, Dorset
BH5 2DF, UK (e-mail: jmiller@aecc.ac.uk).
Paper submitted January 20, 2012; in revised form June 30,
2012; accepted July 4, 2012.
0161-4754/$36.00
Copyright © 2012 by National University of Health Sciences.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.09.010
600
In contrast, a Norwegian study in 2002, which did blind the
parents to treatment allocation, showed similar reductions
in crying with manual therapy and with placebo.
15
However, the manual therapy in that trial was an
intervention nonspecic to the patient. A British study in
2005 compared 2 manual therapies, and although partici-
pants in both treatment arms showed reductions in crying,
there was no placebo group for comparison.
16
Finally, 3
South African studies showed that signicant improve-
ments in crying with manual therapy over detuned
ultrasound
17
and medication
18,19
can only be found in
conference proceedings and therefore remain unpublished
in the peer-reviewed literature. Based on these studies, there
is some but not conclusive evidence to make a recommen-
dation of manual therapy for the excessively crying baby.
22
For there to be a better understanding about the efcacy of
chiropractic treatment for infants with colic, these method-
ological weaknesses should be addressed.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were to conduct a
single-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing chiro-
practic manual therapy with no treatment and to determine
whether parents' knowledge of treatment biases their report
of change in infant crying. The questions posed were as
follows: (i) in colicky infants, is there a difference in crying
time between infants who receive chiropractic manual
therapy and those who do not, and (ii) in colicky infants, is
there a difference in infant crying time between parents
blinded and parents not blinded to treatment?
METHODS
Participants
Infants with unexplained persistent crying (infant colic)
presenting to a chiropractic teaching clinic at the Anglo-
European College of Chiropractic were recruited between
October 2007 and November 2009. The mother's
diagnosisof colic
24-26
was used to determine eligibility
for the trial, veried by a baseline crying diary of 3 days or
more. Other inclusion criteria were as follows: patients had
to be younger than 8 weeks, born at a gestational age of 37
weeks or later, and had a birth weight of 2500 grams or
more and show no signs of other conditions or illness. The
parents of consecutively presenting infants fullling the
inclusion criteria were informed of the study and gave
written consent to participate. Parents completed a
questionnaire (baseline) and were then randomized to 1 of
3 groups using permutated blocks of 18 and computer-
generated allocations. These allocations were sealed in
opaque and consecutively numbered envelopes and
revealed to treating practitioners immediately before
treatment proceeded. In 2 of the 3 groups, infants received
treatment, and in the third, no treatment was administered.
In 1 of the 2 treatment groups, the parent was able to
observe the treatment and knew that the infant was being
treated. In the other 2 groups, the parent was seated behind a
screen and was not able to observe the infant. Thus, in these
2 groups, the parent was blindas to whether or not the
infant was treated. This resulted in 3 groups: (i) infant
treated/parent aware (treated, not blinded, or T[NB]), (ii)
infant treated/parent unaware (treated, blinded, or T[B]),
and (iii) infant not treated/parent unaware (not treated,
blinded, or NT[B]).
Participating parents were not charged for treatment;
those parents of infants in the no-treatment group were
offered a series of free treatments at the end of the study
period. There were no restrictions regarding medication or
other health care use during the trial.
Parents were informed of the interventions in all 3 groups
and gave informed consent to participate. The study received
ethics approval from the Anglo-European College of
Chiropractic Research Ethics Sub-Committee in September
2007. A research assistant was partially funded by the British
Columbia Chiropractic Association. Tomy Toy Company
donated a cuddly toy to each infant at exit of the trial.
Interventions
All treatments were administered by a chiropractic intern
with an experienced chiropractic clinician in attendance.
Treatments were pragmatic, individualized to examination
ndings of the individual infant, and consisted of
chiropractic manual therapy of the spine. Specically, this
involved low force tactile pressure to spinal joints and
paraspinal muscles where dysfunction was noted on
palpation. The manual therapy, estimated at 2 N of force,
was given at the area of involvement without rotation of the
spine. The treatment period was up to 10 days, and the
number of treatments during this period was informed by
the examination ndings and parent reports. Treatment was
terminated if parents reported complete resolution of
symptoms. Infants in the blinded groups were placed by
the parent on the examination table. Thereafter, parents sat
in the examination room but behind a screen so they were
unable to observe the interaction between the practitioner
and their child. Patients in the no-treatment group were not
touched by the intern and/or clinician. The same scripted
words were spoken by the practitioner for infants in all 3
groups and consisted of We will begin treatment now; it
will be just one more minute; that is the end of treatment;
we will stop now.Thus, although parents were informed of
the treatment protocols in each of the 3 groups before
randomization, the implication to all parents was that their
child was being treated.
Outcome Measures
Parents were asked to complete a questionnaire
concerning infant demographics at baseline. Starting at
baseline, a 24-hour crying diary was completed throughout
the study period ending either after 10 days or at discharge
601
Miller et alJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Chiropractic for the Excessively Crying InfantVolume 35, Number 8
(whichever was sooner). Crying time extracted from the
diary
26-28
was selected as the primary outcome measure a
priori. Data extraction was conducted by an assessor blind
to treatment group allocation. A global improvement scale
(GIS) was completed at either 10 days or discharge. This
scale rated the parent's impression of change in their child's
condition since beginning the treatment (1, worse; 2, no
change; 3, little improvement; 4, moderate improvement; 5,
much improvement). Parents also reported on any adverse
effects during the treatment period. To test blinding to
treatment, at the end of the trial, parents blinded to treatment
allocation were asked to guess whether or not their child
had been treated. The options were treated,”“not treated,
and don't know.
Sample Size
The trial was designed to have 80% power to detect a
signicant difference at the 5% level between the groups of
at least 2-hour crying time at 10 days.
13
The SD at baseline
was estimated to be 2.5.
13
Adding 20% for dropouts, we
estimated that we needed at least 30 patients in each group.
Data Analysis
Analysis was performed per protocol. An intention-to-
treat analysis was conducted. For continuous data (reported
crying time), we compared the mean change in crying time
from baseline to each time point between groups using
analysis of covariance with age, sex, and the baseline 24-
hour crying time as covariates.
Categorical data for improvement were calculated from
both the GIS (score 4; moderate and much improvement)
and from cutoff scores on the 24-hour crying diary. We
chose a priori either (i) 2 hours or less in a 24-hour period or
(ii) more than 30% reduction in crying time from baseline.
From these, crude odds ratios and numbers needed to treat
(NNT) and adjusted odds ratios using logistic regression
were calculated.
Parents asked to participate
(n=116)
Declined to participate
(n=12)
Randomised (n=104)
Infants randomised to
treatment without blinding
[T (NB)]
(n=33)
Infants randomised to
treatment with blinding
[T (B)]
(n=35)
Infants randomised to no
treatment with blinding
[NT (B)]
(n=34)
Did not return
(n=2)
With 10 day data (n=26)
Discharged (n=7)
With 10 day data (n=30)
Discharged (n=5)
With 10 day data (n=22)
Dropped out (n=12)
RECRUITMENTRANDOMISATIONFOLLOW-UP
Fig 1. Flow of participants through the trial.
602 Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsMiller et al
October 2012Chiropractic for the Excessively Crying Infant
RESULTS
Of 116 parents of eligible infants given information
about the study, 104 were recruited and their children
randomized to 1 of the 3 groups; the remaining 12 parents
were unwilling to participate. Overrecruitment was consid-
ered appropriate because high dropouts have been noted in
other trials. Two infants were not included in the nal
analysis: one due to sudden-onset illness and the other who
did not return for treatment after recruitment. Data from the
remaining 102 infants were analyzed, with 33 in the T(NB)
group, 35 in the T(B) group, and 34 in the NT(B) group
(Fig 1). There were no signicant differences in baseline
characteristics between the 3 groups, except for sex, with a
greater proportion of boys in the NT(B) group and girls in
the T(B) group (Table 1). Sex has been shown to have no
effect on infant colic in other studies.
By the end of the study period (10 days), 12 patients had
dropped out in the no-treatment (NT[B]) group and 5 and 7
patients had been discharged in the blinded (T[B]) and not
blinded treatment (T[NB]) groups, respectively. The
numbers of dropouts and discharges are shown in Figure 1.
At the end of the trial period or discharge (whichever was
sooner), no adverse events were reported in any of the
infants recruited to the study. One child in the nontreatment
group reported an adverse effect of increased crying.
Of the 35 patients in the treatment group blinded to
treatment allocation, 8 (22.9%) believed that their child was
treated and 17 (48.6%) either did not know or believed that
their child was not treated (there were 10 responses either
missing or where the parent had given answers to 2 of the 3
options). Of the 34 patients in the no-treatment group
blinded to treatment allocation, 5 (14.7%) believed that
their child was not treated and 20 (58.8%) either did not
know or believed that their child was treated (there were 9
responses either missing or where the parent had given
answers to 2 of the 3 options).
Figure 2 and Table 2 show the change in crying time
from baseline values over the 10 days of the trial. The mean
crying times within each of the 3 groups signicantly
decreased over time. Compared with baseline, by day 10,
the mean decrease was 44.4% (Pb.001), 51.2% (Pb.001),
and 18.6% (Pb.05) in the treatment groups (T[B] and T
[NB]) and the no-treatment (NT[B]) groups, respectively.
Comparison of treatment (T[B]) with no treatment (NT[B])
showed statistically signicant differences in mean change
in crying time from baseline at days 8 and 9 in favor of
treatment. By day 10, the mean difference in the change in
crying time from baseline between patients treated and not
treated was 1.5 hours (Table 2). In contrast, there were no
statistically signicant differences in the mean change in
crying time from baseline at any of the time points between
the patients of parents who were and were not blinded to
treatment (Table 2). Table 2 also shows these differences in
change scores where they were adjusted for age, sex, and
baseline crying time. Entering these potential confounders
into the analysis resulted in similar ndings with a
signicant difference in change scores between the blinded
treatment and the no-treatment groups from days 7 to 10,
and again, no statistically signicant differences in change
scores at any time between the blinded and the nonblinded
treatment groups were observed.
To facilitate clinical interpretation of our ndings, we
categorized the change in crying time in terms of
improvement. In this analysis, the odds of improvement
(crude and adjusted for baseline crying time, age, sex)
Table 1. Baseline infant characteristics
T(NB) (n = 33) T(B) (n = 35) NT(B) (n = 34)
Sex (female) 49% 66% 32% *
Age (wk) 5.21 (2.41) 4.9 (2.04) 5.25 (1.73)
Gestational
age (mo)
39.5 (1.66) 39.3 (1.38) 39.0 (1.10)
Birth weight (g) 3469 (363) 3308 (447) 3438 (502)
Crying time (h/d) 5.2 (2.2) 5.4 (2.5) 5.5 (2.1)
n = number of infants.
Pb.05.
Fig 2. Mean change in crying time in the 3 groups during the trial.
603Miller et alJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Chiropractic for the Excessively Crying InfantVolume 35, Number 8
were calculated. Table 3 shows data obtained for
improvement using both the GIS scale and the 2 cutoff
values for the crying time data. In the adjusted analysis
categorizing improvement using crying time scores, there
were signicantly greater odds of improvement with
treatment (T[B]) compared with no treatment (NT[B]) at
days 8 and using the criterion of 2 or less hours of crying
per day, at day 10. This increase in odds of improvement
at day 8 was 8 (95% condence interval [CI], 1.4-45) and
5 (1.5-16), and at day 10, it was 12.0 (2.1-68) and 3 (0.8-
9) using the cutoffs of 2 or less hours of crying per day
and more than 30% change, respectively. Using the GIS to
categorize improvement at the end of the trial, there was a
similar greater odds of improvement with treatment (T[B])
compared with no treatment (NT[B]). Although these
results were statistically signicant, the wide CIs reect-
ing the variability in the data and small sample sizes
indicate the need for caution and the difculty in precisely
estimating any treatment effect in the target population.
Notwithstanding, the NNT approximated 3 (Table 3),
indicating that 3 infants need to be treated to gain one
additional improvement in crying time over no treatment.
DISCUSSION
This study investigated the effect of chiropractic manual
therapy in infants with infantile colic and the effect that
blinding has on the report of crying time by the parent. In
previous studies,
13,14,16-19
any apparent effect that an
intervention had on crying time in colicky infants has
been challenged for lack of blinding of the parents and the
consequential potential for reporting bias. In studies of
interventions for excessive crying in infants, there is no
alternative to the outcome being based on the parent's self-
report of crying behavior, and although crying diaries in
themselves have been shown to be valid measures,
27,28
the
inuence of the parent knowing whether or not his/her child
was treated raises suspicions, rightly or wrongly, about any
observed treatment effect. We attempted to overcome this
impediment by purposively designing the trial to observe
what, if any, effect the parent knowing about their child's
treatment had on the report of crying time. The treatment
was based on evidence that showed that such therapy has
been implicated in reduced crying, and previous authors
have hypothesized that colic is a musculoskeletal
disorder.
13,29,30
Moderate nger pressure on irritable
muscles has shown a relaxation response in adults, which
included decreased heart rate and increased alpha and beta
brainwave activity, which hallmark a relaxation response.
30
A reduction in heart rate secondary to a therapeutic manual
impulse at the suboccipital region has been similarly
demonstrated in infants.
31
Other research corroborates the
safety of the treatment found in this trial.
32
In answer to our rst question, the results of our study
showed statistically signicant differences in the change in
crying time between infants receiving treatment and no
treatment in parents blinded to treatment allocation and a
greater odds of improvement in the treated group toward the
end of the 10-day trial period. Although the results were not
always statistically signicant, the trend was for the treated
infants to show a greater reduction in crying than those in the
nontreated group within 2 to 3 days. This suggests that any
benecial effect of treatment is apparent early on thus
quickly reassuring anxious and distressed parents. The
question on group allocation posed at the end of the study
suggests that the procedures taken to blind parents were
reasonably successful, and the degree of blinding was not
dissimilar between the treated and nontreated groups. When
comparing the effects of parents blinded and not blinded to
treatment, there were no signicant differences in the
reduction in crying, indicating that blinding the parent had
no biasing effect on the report of infant crying behavior.
Other studies
13,14,16-19
where the lack of parental blinding
has been cited as a possible explanation for an observed
Table 2. Mean change in crying times (in hours per day; unadjusted data)
Day
Change scores (baseline follow-up)
Unadjusted differences in change
scores (95% CI)
Adjusted differences in change
scores (95% CI)
T(B) NT(B) T(NB)
T(B) vs NT(B) T(B) vs T(NB) T(B) vs NT(B) T(B) vs T(NB)n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD)
2350.8 (1.5) 33 0.3 (1.6) 32 0.5 (2.0) 0.4 (1.4 to 0.6) 0.3 (1.3 to 0.7) 0.2 (1.5 to 1.1) 0.3 (1.0 to 0.5)
3350.7 (2.4) 33 0.4 (1.9) 32 0.7 (2.3) 0.4 (1.7 to 1.0) 0.04 (1.4 to 1.3) 0.1 (1.7 to 1.9) 0.1 (1.0 to 1.2)
4350.9 (1.9) 31 0.2 (1.8) 31 0.7 (1.6) 1.1 (2.2 to 0.02) 0.2 (1.3 to 0.9) 0.6 (1.9 to 0.8) 0.2 (1.0 to 0.7)
5341.5 (2.3) 29 0.3 (2.0) 30 1.4 (2.0) 1.2 (2.5 to 0.2) 0.1 (1.4 to 1.2) 1.4 (2.5 to 0.3) 0.1 (1.1 to 0.9)
6331.6 (2.2) 28 1.1 (2.0) 29 1.8 (2.1) 0.4 (1.8 to 1.0) 0.2 (1.1 to 1.6) 0.7 (1.7 to 0.3) 0.2 (0.7 to 1.2)
7331.8 (2.4) 24 0.6 (2.1) 29 1.3 (2.1) 1.2 (2.7 to 0.09) 0.5 (1.9 to 0.9) 1.4 (2.6 to 0.2) 0.5 (1.6 to 0.6)
8332.2 (2.4) 24 0.7 (1.5) 27 2.9 (2.2) 1.5 (2.8 to 0.1) 0.7 (0.7 to 2.0) 1.5 (2.5 to 0.5) 0.6 (0.4 to 1.6)
9302.1 (2.2) 23 0.5 (2.2) 26 2.6 (1.2) 1.7 (3.1 to 0.2) 0.4 (1.0 to 1.7) 1.8 (3.0 to 0.6) 0.4 (0.7 to 1.5)
10 30 2.4 (2.5) 22 1.0 (1.6) 26 2.8 (2.2) 1.5 (2.9 to 0.07) 0.4 (1.0 to 1.8) 1.4 (2.5 to 0.3) 0.4 (0.6 to 1.4)
n = number of participants. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Boldface indicates signicant differences. Adjusted for age, sex, and baseline crying time.
604 Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsMiller et al
October 2012Chiropractic for the Excessively Crying Infant
treatment effect might therefore be reconsidered in the light
of this nding. The only other study
15
in which parents were
blinded reported no differences in effect between groups.
Possible explanations for differences in the ndings from
this study and the one reported here include differences in
treatment and control groups (their participants underwent
motion palpation and holding/soothing, whereas our control
group did not receive any clinical handling) and in the
primary outcome measure. Moreover, it is likely that the
study of Olafsdottir et al
15
included more infants at the
severe end of the crying spectrum (as all had been previously
treated unsuccessfully in the health care system), and the
analysis did not account for the large dropout in the control
group, which may have included the highest criers, as other
studies show.
13,33
All dropouts in this study occurred in the no-treatment
group, which has also been shown to be the case in other
studies.
13,33
Although the parents of these infants were
apparently blindto the treatment group, we can speculate
that any lack of improvement deterred parents from
returning to the clinic. Alternatively, these parents may
have correctly guessed that their child was not being treated
and left the trial to be treated elsewhere. This is supported
by our ndings of no difference between the treatment
groups in which parents were blinded and not blinded to
treatment. We found a clinically signicant effect of
chiropractic manual therapy in this patient group but,
importantly, that this is evident despite whether or not
parents know their child was treated. We can conclude that
any reporting bias by the parent was not responsible for the
observed effect of treatment in this study.
A relatively low number of parents (n = 5 [15%])
reported that their child was not treated in the NTB group. It
is also true that this was greater in the TB group, where 17
(49%) of the parents considered that either their child was
not treated or they did not know. One reason for this is that
we are, of course, not comparing like with like because the
second is a composite gure. In addition, the 9 who
dropped out in the NTB group might be assumed to have
done so because their babies were not being treated. If this
assumption were true, this would raise the number of
patients who were not being treated to 14 (41%). When
combined with the number of parents who did not know
(20; 59%), this would bring the total to 100% compared
with the 48% in the TB group, in line with what might
be expected.
Limitations
This randomized trial did have limitations that caution
interpretation of the ndings, not least conducting a trial in a
routine practice setting and the consequential problems of loss
to follow-up. This was compounded by the fact that we
decided, for ethical reasons, to discharge patients who were
recovered early on in the trial.
34
Together with small sample
sizes from the outset and variability within our data sets, this
meant that estimates of effects in the target population were
imprecise, thus compromising, at least in part, their clinical use.
Although we paid particular attention to blinding the
parents, it was not possible to exclude the parent from the
treatment room altogether because of regulations governing
chiropractic treatment for minors in the United Kingdom.
Moreover, we only checked parents for blinding at the end
of the study. By asking parents to state whether or not they
thought their child was being treated, it was inevitable that
any change in their child's condition by the end of the
treatment period would have inuenced their decision.
Thus, we did not know the parents' beliefsday by day
throughout the study period at times when they were
completing the crying diary. Furthermore, as a single-blind
trial, we only attempted to blind the parents. It was
Table 3. Mean change in crying times (in hours per day; adjusted data)
Improvement Days
Proportion
improved
(%), T(B) NT(B)
Crude OR
(95% CI),
T(NB) T(B) vs NT(B) NNT
Adjusted OR (95% CI) *
T(B) vs T(NB)T(B) vs T(NB) T(B) vs NT(B)
(i) 2-h crying
per day
2 8.6 9 12.5 0.9 (0.2-5.0) 1.5 (0.3-7.4) 0.8 (0.1-8.9) 2.0 (0.3-12.8)
4 11.4 6.4 12.9 1.9 (0.3-11.0) 1.1 (0.3-5.0) 1.9 (0.2-15.0) 1.1 (0.2-5.6)
6 27.3 14.3 20.7 2.2 (0.6-8.3) 0.7 (0.2-2.3) 2.3 (0.5-10.4) 0.7 (0.2-2.3)
8 45.4 12 37 6.1 (1.5-24.4) 3 0.7 (0.2-2.0) 8.1 (1.4-45.0) 0.7 (0.2-2.0)
10 50 13.6 34.6 6.3 (1.5-26.0) 2.7 0.5 (0.2-1.5) 11.8 (2.1-68.3) 0.5 (0.1-1.6)
(ii) N30% change 2 37.1 24.2 37.5 1.8 (0.6-5.3) 1.0 (0.6-13.6) 2.4 (0.8-8.2) 0.7 (0.3-2.0)
4 40 25.8 29 1.9 (0.7-5.5) 0.6 (0.2-1.7) 3.8 (0.9-15.1) 0.3 (0.1-1.0)
6 51.5 46.4 62.1 1.3 (0.4-3.4) 1.5 (0.5-4.2) 1.1 (0.4-3.3) 1.3 (0.4-3.8)
8 63.6 24 63 5.5 (1.7-17.6) 2.7 1.0 (0.3-2.8) 4.9 (1.5-16.3) 0.7 (0.2-2.1)
10 63.3 31.8 73.1 3.7 (1.1-11.8) 1.6 (0.5-4.9) 2.8 (0.8-9.3) 1.1 (0.3-3.7)
(iii) GIS 10 82.3 11.1 93.7 37.3 (8.4-165) 1.4 3.2 (0.6-17.3) 44.3 (7.7-253) 1.9 (0.4-9.0)
Participants categorized as improved based on (i) less than 2 hours of crying per day, (ii) more than 30% change from baseline, and (iii) scoring 4 or 5 on
the GIS. Boldface indicates signicant differences.
OR, odds ratio.
Adjusted for age, sex, and baseline crying time.
605Miller et alJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Chiropractic for the Excessively Crying InfantVolume 35, Number 8
obviously not possible to blind those administering the
treatment, and thus, the ndings of this study may be
subject to practitioner bias. The practitioners in this trial had
no part in reporting outcomes from care.
External validity is often problematic in randomized
trials, and this study is no exception. Infants were treated in
an outpatient teaching clinic by different nal-year student
interns accompanied by experienced clinicians. This does
not reect treatment that is received in established
chiropractic practices. Similarly, most parents were referred
by general practitioners, midwives, and health visitors in
the area, and in many cases, parents expected to pay for
treatment. Whether our sample represents the population of
parents of infants with excessive crying symptoms is
therefore questionable. Moreover, the inclusion criterion
that allowed for the mother's diagnosis of excessive crying
is a subjective one, although paradoxically, this may
increase the generalizability of the ndings and all infants
did t the routine denition of colic for amount of crying
previously shown in the research.
1-3,25-29
Also, diary
information and parental reporting of accurate time crying
may be subject to recording error or bias.
Finally, we used 2 cutoffs in the change in crying time
with which to categorize improvement in our participants.
The more conservative of these was 2 or less hours per day
of crying, which has been reported in the literature as a
normallevel of crying.
24,35
The other cutoff of more than
30% reduction in crying was entirely arbitrary on our part
and is open to challenge. However, we felt it necessary to
dene these end points to report the ndings in clinically
signicant terms rather than as group mean statistically
signicant decreases in crying time that are more difcult to
interpret from a clinical perspective. Both cutoff points
were chosen for the practical reason to increase the
robustness of the clinical results because cutoff points can
be considered arbitrary. We did not mix the cutoff points
but purposely kept them separate, to address any criticism
concerning an idiosyncratic cutoff point.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the ndings of this study demonstrate a
greater decline in crying behavior in colicky infants treated
with chiropractic manual therapy compared with infants
who were not treated. The ndings also showed that
knowledge of treatment by the parent did not appear to
contribute to the observed treatment effects in this study.
Thus, it is unlikely that observed treatment effect is due to
bias on the part of the reporting parent.
FUNDING SOURCES AND POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
A research assistant was partially funded by the British
Columbia Chiropractic Association. Tomy Toy Company
donated a cuddly toy to each infant at exit of the trial. No
conicts of interest were reported for this study.
REFERENCES
1. Douglas P, Hill P. Managing infants who cry excessively in
the first few months of life. BMJ 2011;343:d7772.
2. Morris S, St James-Roberts I, Sleep J, Gillham P. Economic
evaluation of strategies for managing crying and sleeping
problems. Arch Dis Child 2001;84:15-9.
3. Lucassen P. Colic in infants. Clin Evid 2010;02:309.
4. Freedman SB, Al-Harthy N, Thull-Freedman J. The crying
infant: diagnostic testing and frequency of serious underlying
disease. Pediatrics 2009;123:841-8.
5. Crotteau CA, Wight ST, Eglash A. Clinical inquiries. What is
the best treatment for infant colic? J Fam Pract 2006;55:634-6.
6. Reijneveld SA, van der Wal MF, Brugman E, Hira Sing RA,
Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Infant crying and abuse. Lancet
2004;364:1340-2.
7. Savino F, Castagno E, Bretto R, Brondello C, Palumeri E,
Oggero R. A prospective 10-year study of children who had
severe infantile colic. Acta Paeditry Suppl 2005;94:129-32.
8. Wolke D, Rizzo P, Woods S. Persistent infant crying and
hyperactivity problems in middle childhood. Pediatrics 2002;
109:1054-60.
9. Miller JE, Phillips HL. Long-term effects of infant colic: a
survey comparison of chiropractic treatment and nontreatment
groups. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32:635-8.
10. Hestbaek L, Jørgensen A, Hartvigsen J. A description of
children and adolescents in Danish chiropractic practice:
results from a nationwide survey. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
2009;32:607-15.
11. Kemper KJ, Vohra S, Walls R. The use of complementary and
alternative medicine in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2008;122:662-8.
12. Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin R. Complementary and
alternative medicine use among adults and children: United
States, 2007. CDC Natl Health Stats Report No. 23; 2008.
p. 1-23.
13. Wiberg JMM, Nordsteen J, Nilsson N. The short-term effect
of spinal manipulation in the treatment of infantile colic: a
randomized controlled clinical trial with a blinded observer.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:517-22.
14. Hayden C, Mullinger B. A preliminary assessment of the
impact of cranial osteopathy for the relief of infant colic.
Complement Ther Clin Pract 2006;12:83-90.
Practical Applications
This study found that excessively crying infants
were at least 5 times as likely to cry signicantly
less if they were treated with chiropractic manual
therapy than if they were not treated, even when
brought to the same venue.
Infants who were treated were equally likely to
improve, whether the parents were blinded to
treatment or not.
Parents expected a short course of treatment and left
care if no improvement was seen in the rst week as
well as if recovery was obtained in the rst week.
606 Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsMiller et al
October 2012Chiropractic for the Excessively Crying Infant
15. Olafsdottir E, Forshei S, Fluge G, Markestad T. Randomized
controlled trial of infant colic treated with chiropractic spinal
manipulation. Arch Dis Child 2001;84:138-41.
16. Browning M, Miller J. Comparison of short-term effects of
chiropractic spinal manipulation and occipito-sacral decom-
pression in the treatment of infant colic: a single-blinded
randomised comparison trial. Clin Chiropr 2008;11:122-9.
17. Koonin SD, Karpelowsky AS, Yelverton CJ, Rubens BN. A
comparative study to determine the efficacy of chiropractic
spinal manipulative therapy and allopathic medication in the
treatment of infantile colic [abstract]. World Federation of
Chiropractic 7th Biennial Congress. Orlando, FL: World
Federation of Chiropractic; 2002. p. 18.
18. Mercer C, Nook BC. The efficacy of chiropractic spinal
adjustments as a treatment protocol in the management of
infantile colic. In: Haldeman S, Murphy B, editors. 5th
Biennial Congress of the World Federation of Chiropractic.
Auckland: World Federation of Chiropractic; 1999. p. 170-1.
19. Karpelowsky AS. The efficacy of chiropractic spinal
manipulative therapy in the treatment of infantile colic. MSc
Dissertation. Health Sciences, Technikon Witwatersrand.
Johannesburg, 2004.
20. Ernst E. Chiropractic spinal manipulation for infant colic: a
systematic review of randomised trials. Int J Clin Pract 2009;
63:1351-3.
21. Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R, Leiniger B, Triano J.
Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report.
Chiropr Osteopath 2010;18:3.
22. Hussereau D, Clifford T, Aker P, Leduc D, Mensinkai S.
Spinal manipulation for infantile colic. Ottawa: Canadian
Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment.
2003. Technology report No 42.
23. Volkening DA. The short-term effect of spinal manipulation
in the treatment of infantile colic: a randomized controlled
clinical trial with a blinded observer. J Manipulative Physiol
Ther 2000;23:365.
24. Canivet C, Hagander B, Jakobsson I, Lanke J. Infantile colic-
less common than previously estimated? Acta Paediatr 1996;
85:454-8.
25. Pauli-Pott U, Becker K, Mertesacker T, Beckmann D. Infants
with colic”—mothers' perspectives on the crying problem.
J Psychosom Res 2000;48:125-32.
26. Barr RG, Rotman A, Yaremko J, Leduc D, Francoeur TE. The
crying of infants with colic: a controlled empirical description.
Pediatrics 1992;90:14-21.
27. St. James-Roberts I, Hurry H, Bowyer J. Objective confirma-
tion of crying durations in infants referred for excessive
crying. Arch Dis Child 1993;68:82-4.
28. Barr RG, Kramer MS, Boisjoly C, McVey-White L, Pless IB.
Parental diary of infant cry and fuss behaviour. Arch Dis Child
1988;63:380-7.
29. Wiberg KR, Wiberg JM. A retrospective study of chiropractic
treatment of 276 Danish infants with infantile colic.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010;33:536-41.
30. Diego MA, Field T, Sanders C, Hernandez-Reif M.
Massage therapy of moderate and light pressure and
vibrator effects on EEG and heart rate. Int J Neurosci
2004;114:31-45.
31. Koch LE, Koch H, Graumann-Brunt S, Stolle D, Ramirez J-
M, Saternus K-S. Heart rate changes in response to mild
mechanical irritation of the high cervical spinal cord in infants.
Forensic Sci Int 2002;128:168-76.
32. Miller JE, Benfield K. Adverse effects of spinal manipulative
therapy in children younger than 3 years: a retrospective study
in a chiropractic teaching clinic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther
2008;31:419-23.
33. McRury JM, Zolotor AJ. A randomized controlled trial of a
behavioural intervention to reduce crying among infants.
J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:315-22.
34. Hawk C, Schneider M, Ferrance RJ, Hewitt E, Van Loon M,
Tanis L. Best practices recommendations for chiropractic
care for infants, children, and adolescents: results of a
consensus process. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32:
639-47.
35. Clifford TJ, Campbell K, Speechley KN, Gorodzinsky F.
Sequelae of infant colic: evidence of transient infant distress
and absence of lasting effects on maternal mental health. Arch
Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:1183-8.
607Miller et alJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Chiropractic for the Excessively Crying InfantVolume 35, Number 8
... Several treatment techniques have been described for infantile colic, such as pharmacological interventions, 6 probiotics, dietary modifications, 7 physiotherapy 8 or other complementary and alternative medicines (CAM). Structural osteopathy, 9 cranial osteopathy, 10 visceral osteopathy, and chiropractic treatments 11 are the most frequently performed CAM techniques. ...
... The diagnostic criteria for infantile colic in four studies was uncontrollable and inexplicable crying for more than three hours per day, for three days per week, for three weeks. 11,[35][36][37] The other study focused on babies that had cried unconsolably for 90 minutes in each 24-hour period on five of the last seven days. 38 Babies under eight, 11 nine, 36 12 35,38 and 14 37 weeks of age were recruited. ...
... Two studies used osteopathic techniques based on manipulations and/or mobilisations of the craniosacral complex, 35,38 and three used chiropractic mobilisation or manipulation. 11,36,37 No interventions were applied in the control groups. Table 2 provides detailed descriptions of the interventions. ...
Article
Aim: Osteopathy and chiropractic techniques are used for babies for different reasons, but it is unclear how effective they are. The aim of this study was to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing crying time and increasing sleeping time in babies with infantile colic. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on infantile colic studies that used complementary and alternative medicine techniques as interventions. The outcome measures were hours spent crying and/or sleeping. We used the PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Osteopathic Medicine Digital Database and Google Scholar databases from inception to 11 November 2022. Results: The methodological quality of the randomised control trials ranged from fair to high. We focused on five studies with 422 babies. Complementary treatments failed to decrease the crying time (mean difference -1.08, 95% CI -2.17 to 0.01, I2 = 92%) and to increase sleeping time (mean difference 1.11, 95% CI -0.20 to 2.41; I2 : 91%), compared with no intervention. The quality of the evidence was rated as very low for both outcome measures. Conclusion: Osteopathy and chiropractic treatment failed to reduce the crying time and increase sleeping time in babies with infantile colic, compared to no additional intervention.
... The main results of the included studies are summarized in Table 1 [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and Table 2 [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. For the 27 studies included in the table, the results of the intervention were classified into four categories: positive (P), negative (N), neutral (NS), and non-assessable. ...
... In addition, the rate of AEs in the control group was higher than in the treatment group. Four studies reported that AEs occurred in the control group in infants with IC [34,37,39,45]. These four studies reported AEs indicative of worsening symptoms, such as increased crying in the control group. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Frozen shoulder (FS) is one of the most challenging shoulder disorders for patients and clinicians. Its symptoms mainly include any combination of stiffness, nocturnal pain, and limitation of active and passive glenohumeral joint movement. Conventional treatment options for FS are physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, injection therapy, and arthroscopic capsular release, but adverse and limited effects continue to present problems. As a result, pharmacoacupuncture (PA) is getting attention as an alternative therapy for patients with FS. PA is a new form of acupuncture treatment in traditional Korean medicine (TKM) that is mainly used for musculoskeletal diseases. It has similarity and specificity compared to corticosteroid injection and hydrodilatation, making it a potential alternative injection therapy for FS. However, no systematic reviews investigating the utilization of PA for FS have been published. Therefore, this review aims to standardize the clinical use of PA for FS and validate its therapeutic effect. Methods The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42023445708) on 18 July 2023. Until Aug. 31, 2023, seven electronic databases will be searched for randomized controlled trials of PA for FS. Authors will be contacted, and manual searches will also be performed. Two reviewers will independently screen and collect data from retrieved articles according to predefined criteria. The primary outcome will be pain intensity, and secondary outcomes will be effective rate, Constant-Murley Score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, range of motion, quality of life, and adverse events. Bias and quality of the included trials will be assessed using the Cochrane handbook’s risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Meta analyses will be conducted using Review Manager V.5.3 software. GRADE will be used to evaluate the level of evidence for each outcome. Results This systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted following PRISMA statement. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Conclusion This review will provide scientific evidence to support health insurance policy as well as the standardization of PA in clinical practice.
... The main results of the included studies are summarized in Table 1 [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and Table 2 [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. For the 27 studies included in the table, the results of the intervention were classified into four categories: positive (P), negative (N), neutral (NS), and non-assessable. ...
... In addition, the rate of AEs in the control group was higher than in the treatment group. Four studies reported that AEs occurred in the control group in infants with IC [34,37,39,45]. These four studies reported AEs indicative of worsening symptoms, such as increased crying in the control group. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess and compare the effectiveness of manual therapy in alleviating infant crying, a common symptom of nocturnal crying (NC) and infantile colic (IC). Methods Total effective rate, crying time and adverse events were used as outcome indicators. To assess the quality, the risk of bias was determined for each study by two authors, using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.0 was used for data analysis. A total of 98 articles were identified from 6 electronic databases. Results Among them, twenty-seven studies which included 13 NC and 14 IC were included. Meta-analysis showed favorable effects tuina therapy on total effective rate (TER) of NC (RR 1.20 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.37], p = 0.007), chiropractic therapy on crying time change of IC (SMD –0.83 [95% CI –1.61 to –0.06], p = 0.04) and massage on total crying time of IC (SMD –0.86 [95% CI –1.09 to –0.63], p < 0.00001). This systematic review compares different manual therapies for the treatment of NC and IC. While tuina, chiropractic, and massage show results in alleviating symptoms, the overall evidence remains limited due to the low quality and heterogeneity of the included studies. Conclusion Therefore, further high-quality research with unified control groups is needed to establish manual therapy as a recommended treatment option for NC and IC. Protocol registration number is CRD42022348143 01/08/2022.
... From a methodological point of view, it seems ideal to let parents assess the symptoms of their babies without knowing whether treatment has taken place or not (focus on internal validity). However, convincing findings from other studies (e.g., Miller et al. [29]) as well as methodological considerations regarding the question investigated here suggest that blinding would be neither helpful nor goal-directing in this case. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Colic in infants is defined as excessive crying in an otherwise healthy and thriving baby. Colic is a common but poorly understood and often frustrating problem for caregivers. Objective To study whether osteopathic treatments of infants with infantile colic / excessive crying (IC/EC) have an impact on the subjectively perceived psychological stress of caregivers compared to usual care. Methods The study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Infants aged 1 week to 3 months and who met Rome IV criteria for IC/EC were included. By means of external randomization, infants were allocated to an intervention group or a control group. Infants in the intervention group received three osteopathic treatments at intervals of one weeks. The treatments were custom-tailored and based on osteopathic principles. Controls received their osteopathic treatment after a 3 week untreated period. The primary outcome parameter was the assessment of parental psychological stress (three questions), measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS; 0–10). Furthermore, the average daily crying time (measured using the Likert scale), the crying intensity (measured using the NRS) and the parents' self-confidence (measured using the Karitane Parenting Confidence Scale) were assessed. Results A total of 103 infants (average age 39.4 ±19.2 days) were included, 52 in the intervention group and 51 in the control group. An inter-group comparison of changes revealed clinically relevant improvements in favor of the intervention group for the main outcome – parameter psychological stress – for all 3 questions (e.g., for question 2 respectively 3, NRS: between group difference of means 3.5; 95% CI: 2.6 to 4.4; p < 0.001). For the secondary outcome parameters of crying intensity and crying time/day, the changes were of similar magnitude. Conclusion Three osteopathic treatments given over a period of two weeks led to statistically significant and clinically relevant positive changes of parental psychological stress. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00025867, registration date 10.08.21.
... In previous RCTs testing the effectiveness of manual therapy interventions for infantile colic and crying time with no intervention control groups, the crying time outcomes favoured the intervention [31][32][33] whereas in RCTs with an attention control there was either no difference or inconclusive ndings between the groups. [34][35][36][37][38] Our results are in keeping with the latter, perhaps indicating the impact of either indirect non-speci c or contextual effects on parents' reports of their infants' outcomes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Many parents seek osteopathic care for their infants with colic. Our aim was to test the effectiveness of usual light touch osteopathic treatment on crying time for infants with ‘colic’. Methods: A superiority, two arm, single blinded (parent) multi-centre (UK, Australia and Switzerland), randomised controlled trial, included healthy infants between 1 and 69 days of age who excessively cried, fussed, or were distressed and difficult to console. The Test intervention consisted of usual light touch osteopathic treatment, the Control intervention simple light touch to random body locations with no treatment intent. Both groups received best practice advice and guidance. The primary outcome was the daily crying time, reported hourly by parents in a diary, for two-weeks. Secondary outcomes were parenting confidence, global change, satisfaction, and experience of care. Results: Sixty-six infants were recruited (32 Test: 34 Control group). Mean average daily crying time in the Test group was 124 min (SD = 69, n = 26) and in the Control 115 min (SD = 49, n = 29). After adjustment, infants in the Test group cried 2.2 min more per day than those in the Control group (CI95 % −20 to 25 min, p = 0.849). Parents’ perceptions of global change in symptoms, satisfaction with, and experience of care were high and similar in both groups. There were no serious adverse events related to the treatments or the trial. Conclusion: Usual light touch osteopathic treatment was not superior to simple light touch without treatment intent. The biomechanical explanatory models and underpinning assumptions about the mechanisms of osteopathic intentional light touch care may require reconsideration. Trial registration: ACTRN12620000047998 (January 22, 2020).
... The benefits recorded in our own trial may have arisen from the application of osteopathic manual therapy targeting the structural, cranial and visceral spheres. In another related study, Miller et al. [51] obtained positive results, with less crying by the babies receiving treatment. These authors also analysed the impact of blinding the parents to the treatment provided. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Infant colic is a multifactorial syndrome for which various therapeutic strategies have been proposed. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of osteopathic manual therapy in treating symptoms related to infant colic. Method: A prospective, randomised, blinded clinical trial was conducted of patients diagnosed with infant colic. The treatment group were given osteopathic manual therapy, and their parents received two sessions of counselling. The control group received no such therapy, but their parents attended the same counselling sessions. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was applied to determine whether there were significant differences between the groups for the numerical variables considered. For the qualitative variables, Fisher's exact test was used. The threshold assumed for statistical significance was 0.05. Results: A total of 42 babies were assigned to each group. Those in the experimental group presented less severe infant colic with a trend towards statistical significance after the first session (p = 0.09). In sucking, excretion, eructation and gas there were no significant differences between the groups. Crying was a statistically significant dimension both after the first intervention (p = 0.03) and two weeks after (p = 0.04). Regurgitation values were significantly lower in the experimental group during the three weeks of follow-up (p = 0.05). Values for sleep were lower in the experimental group, but the differences were not statistically significant. In both groups, colic severity decreased over time, with no side effects. Conclusions: Treatment with osteopathic manual therapy alleviates the symptoms of infant colic and could be recommended for this purpose from the onset of the condition.
Article
Full-text available
Background Pragmatic randomized controlled trials are getting more interest to improve trials’ external validity. This study aimed to assess how pragmatic the design of the self-labelled pragmatic randomised controlled trials in the manual therapy field is. Methods We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for self-labelled pragmatic randomised controlled trials in the manual therapy field until January 2024 were included. Two independent reviewers collected and extracted data related to the intention of the trial, the rationale for the intervention, and specific features of the trial and performed an assessment using the PRECIS-2 tool. Results Of 39 self-labelled pragmatic trials, the mean PRECIS-2 score was 3.5 (SD: 0.6). Choice of outcome measures, how the interventions were performed, the follow-up of the participants and how all the available data were included in the statistical analysis were the domains rated as most ‘pragmatic’. Participants’ eligibility, recruitment, and setting obtained lower scores. Less than 25% of the trials claimed that the aim was to investigate an intervention under real-world conditions and to make clinical decisions about its effectiveness. In the 21% of the sample the authors described neither the proof-of-concept of the intervention nor the state of previous studies addressing related research questions. Conclusions Self-labelled pragmatic randomised controlled trials showed a moderately pragmatic attitude. Beyond the label ‘pragmatic’, the description of the intention of the trial and the context of every PRECIS-2 domain is crucial to understanding the real pragmatism of a trial.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Pragmatic randomized controlled trials are getting more interest to improve trials external validity. This study aimed to assess how pragmatic the design of the self-labelled pragmatic randomised controlled trials in the manual therapy field is. Methods We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for self-labelled pragmatic randomised controlled trials in the manual therapy field until January 2022 were included. Two independent reviewers collected and extracted data related to the intention of the trial, the rationale for the intervention, and specific features of the trial and performed an assessment using the PRECIS-2 tool. Results Of 37 self-labelled pragmatic trials, the mean PRECIS-2 score was 3.5 (SD: 0.6). Choice of outcome measures, how the interventions were performed, the follow-up of the participants and how all the available data were included in the statistical analysis were the domains rated as most 'pragmatic'. Participants' eligibility, recruitment, and setting obtained lower scores. Less than 20% of the trials claimed that the aim was to investigate an intervention under real-world conditions and to make clinical decisions about its effectiveness. In the 22% of the sample the authors described neither the proof-of-concept of the intervention nor the state of previous studies addressing related research questions. Conclusions Self-labelled pragmatic randomised controlled trials showed a moderately pragmatic attitude. Beyond the label ‘pragmatic’, the description of the intention of the trial and the context of every PRECIS-2 domain is crucial to understanding the real pragmatism of a trial.
Book
Full-text available
Fonksiyonel tıp
Article
Full-text available
#### Summary points Community cohort studies report that a fifth of parents say that their otherwise healthy baby has cry-fuss problems at two months of age.1 2 Excessive crying is usually a transient neurodevelopmental phenomenon, although it may herald problems that are more long term and serious. Various studies have found that it is often difficult for parents to access the help they need when they experience problem crying; that they resort to use of multiple health services, including of emergency departments; and that they receive conflicting advice.3 w1 We review evidence from heterogeneous studies across multiple health disciplines to provide a practical guide to the management of term infants who cry excessively in the first few months of life. Our review is aimed at paediatricians, general practitioners, community child health nurses, and midwives. Although definitions of infant crying vary considerably, for practical purposes we use the terms cry-fuss behaviour, excessive crying, colic, and unsettled infant behaviour interchangeably to refer to any crying behaviour that parents report …
Article
Full-text available
Colic in infants causes one in six families (17%) with children to consult a health professional. One systematic review of 15 community-based studies found a wide variation in prevalence, which depended on study design and method of recording. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for colic in infants? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to September 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). We found 27 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: advice to increase carrying, advice to reduce stimulation, casein hydrolysate milk, cranial osteopathy, crib vibrator device, focused counselling, gripe water, infant massage, low-lactose milk, simethicone, soya-based infant feeds, spinal manipulation, and whey hydrolysate milk.
Article
Colic has been described using the "rule of 3": crying for at least 3 hours per day on at least 3 days per week for at least 3 weeks. The distinction can be subtle; a normal infant can cry more than 2 hours per day. This syndrome has its onset typically in the first few weeks of life. It spontaneously resolves by age 4 to 6 months. Prevalence depends on the definition used for colic; approximately 5% to 25% of infants meet some reasonable definition of colic. The cause of infantile colic is poorly understood. Although clinicians tend to focus on a likely gastrointestinal cause, neuropsychological issues, food allergy, and parenting misadventures are also potential contributing factors. There are myriad strategies-ranging from craniosacral osteopathic manipulation to car ride simulation-offered for dealing with infantile colic. Although none of these treatments has been validated in rigorous studies, the available evidence offers tentative support for 3 strategies: (1) a trial of a hypoallergenic (protein hydrolysate) formula (for formula fed infants), (2) a low-allergen maternal diet (for breastfeeding mothers), and (3) reduced stimulation of the infant. A systematic review analyzed controlled clinical trials lasting at least 3 days involving infants less than 6 months of age who cried excessively. Twenty-seven studies were included; the outcome measure was colic symptoms, typically reported as duration of crying. Two reports studying hypoallergenic (protein hydrolysate) formula in nearly 130 infants found an effect size of 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.34) for the hypoallergenic formula. Additionally, 3 behavioral trials (involving nearly 200 infants) revealed the benefits of reduced stimulation of the colicky infant (effect size of 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-0.74). A more recent systematic review followed a similar high-quality search strategy and identified 22 articles, and reported a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6 for the 2 hypoallergenic formula studies identified in the previous review. Because of concern regarding the quality of the behavioral studies involving infants with colic, the authors of this second review only included 1 small (42 patients) trial of decreased stimulation, which resulted in a relative risk (RR) of 1.87 (95% CI, 1.04-3.34) and a NNT of 2. There was some inconclusive evidence to suggest benefit to dietary adjustment for breastfeeding mothers (specifically, the avoidance of cow's milk and other potential allergens like nuts, eggs, and wheat). A recent randomized controlled trial confirmed the value of this approach by showing significant improvement in distress scores of infants whose mothers followed a low-allergen diet (excluding dairy, soy, wheat, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, and fish) for 7 days. This well-designed study included 107 patients (a relatively large sample in the published research about colic), and showed an absolute risk reduction of 37% (NNT=3) for those mothers following the challenge. A small RCT (43 patients) suggested efficacy in the substitution of a whey hydrolysate formula in place of cow's milk-based formula for infants with colic (casein hydrolysate formula has been more widely studied), but there continues to be controversy regarding the preferred protein hydrolysate formula (whey vs casein) in the treatment of colic. Several medications have been tested in RCTs; only dicyclomine has shown an effect in a few small RCTs. However, there have been reports of apnea and other serious, although infrequent, adverse effects. For that reason, the manufacturer has contraindicated the use of this medication in infants aged <6 months. A small (n=68) study of an herbal tea showed reduced symptoms (RR=0.57 favoring the active tea), although the mean volume of tea consumption (32 mL/kg/d) is a nutritional concern in this age group. No adverse events were noted, but the small sample size limits the ability to detect any but the most common events.
Article
Objective To compare two interventions in the treatment of infant colic. Design A single-blinded, randomised, and comparison trial. Setting Anglo-European College of Chiropractic teaching clinic. Participants Forty-three infants of less than 8 weeks of age who cried >3 h/day for at least 4 of the previous 7 days. Interventions Two weeks of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT, n = 22) or occipito-sacral decompression (OSD, n = 21). Main outcome measures Change in daily hours of crying. Results At day 7 of the trial, the mean hours of crying per day were significantly reduced in both groups (SMT, by 2.1 h/day, p < 0.001; OSD, by 2.0 h/day, p < 0.001). At day 14, the mean hours of crying per day were significantly reduced in both groups (SMT, by 3.1 h/day, p < 0.001; OSD, by 2.5 h/day, p < 0.001). At day 14, the mean hours of sleep per day were significantly increased in both groups (SMT, by 1.7 h/day, p < 0.01; OSD, by 1.0 h/day, p < 0.01). Four weeks after completion of the treatment trial, colic had resolved in 82% of the SMT group and 67% of the OSD group. Conclusion Both treatments appear to offer significant benefits to infants with colic. Infants treated by SMT or OSD cried less and slept more after 2 weeks of treatment. There were no differences in outcomes between the two treatment approaches. Although the participants completed the trial of therapy prior to the usual age of remission for infant colic, the natural course cannot be ruled out. Therefore, the treatment approaches as a cause of the observed benefits in this study must be appropriately interpreted.
Article
The aim of this study was to investigate if the outcome of excessively crying infants treated with chiropractic manipulation (1) was associated with age and/or (2), at least partially, can be explained by age according to the natural decline in crying. This was a retrospective evaluation of clinical records of 749 infants from a private Danish chiropractic practice. All of the infants were healthy, thriving infants born to term within the age of 0 to 3 months who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for excessively crying infants (infantile colic), whose parents sought chiropractic treatment. The infants were treated using chiropractic management as decided by the treating doctor of chiropractic, and changes in crying based upon the parents' report were noted as improved, uncertain, or nonrecovered. Age predictor groups were cross-tabulated against the outcome variables, and difference between classification groups was tested with χ(2) tables and confidence intervals. Slightly older age was found to be linked to excessively crying infants who experienced clinical improvement. However, no apparent link between the clinical effect of chiropractic treatment and a natural decline in crying was found for this group of infants. The findings of this study do not support the assumption that effect of chiropractic treatment of infantile colic is a reflection of the normal cessation of this disorder.
Article
To evaluate the efficacy of videotaped instruction of a behavioral intervention to reduce crying among newborns. Mothers of healthy, full-term newborns were recruited from the postpartum unit of a large community hospital for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of an intervention to reduce infant crying. Mothers participating in the intervention viewed a videotape with instructions involving swaddling, side positioning, white noise, jiggling, and sucking. Mothers in the control group viewed a videotape with instructions for normal newborn care. Intervention was assessed by mean hours per day of infant total crying (fussing, crying, and unsoothable crying) and sleeping as recorded in a diary 3 days a week during the 1st, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 12th weeks of age; the Parenting Stress Index was also used during the 6th and 12th weeks. Fifty-one mother-infant pairs were recruited; 35 completed the study (18 intervention and 17 controls). Sixteen were lost to follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the hours of mean daily total crying or sleeping during the 1st, 4th, 6th, 8th, or 12th weeks of age. For example, during the 6th week of age mean daily total crying was 1.9 hours for infants in the control group versus 2.2 hours for infants in the intervention group (P = .4); sleep was 14.5 hours for infants in the control group versus 14.4 hours for infants in the intervention group (P = .8). During the 12th week mean daily total crying was 1.2 hours for infants in the control group versus 1.8 hours for infants in the intervention group (P = .8) and sleep was 14.1 hours for infants in the control group versus 14.0 hours for infants in the intervention group (P = 1.0). There was no difference between the groups in the Parenting Stress Index during the 6th week of age. The behavioral intervention, when provided via videotape, does not seem to be efficacious in decreasing total crying among normal infants.