The United States, and within it specifically the city of New York, have long held the reputations of being host to large numbers of transnational migrants. However, in 2016 the United States elected a President, Donald Trump, who is openly hostile toward migrants; this event had ignited an upswing in anti-migrant discourse within US society. The aim of this study is to investigate how these political changes in the United States have influenced the lives of individual migrant young adults living in contemporary New York City. Specifically, this research study seeks to shed light on the emotions and affects of young migrants in New York, as well as their subjective spatial perceptions of the city they live in, and the everyday practices associated with those perceptions. It also seeks to see how these practices and perceptions have changed over the course of the past year (the period during which Donald Trump was elected President), and these geopolitical events are connected with the aforementioned practices and emotions.
This study takes as its theoretical starting point a conception of space as a zone of social contestation. It then investigates this social contestation from four interconnected theoretical standpoints: the theoretical traditions of emotional geographies and of Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice, and the idea of banal geopolitics and imagined geographies. In terms of method, this study involved four types of data collection. These were semi-structured verbal interviews with participants, participatory mapping tasks, photo submission tasks, and secondary data collection of demographic statistics about areas participants identified as being emotionally salient. These four types of data were then integrated and triangulated together.
In total, fifteen migrants between the ages of 18 and 26 took part in this study, recruited for the most part through universities. These migrants had very diverse backgrounds in terms of race, ethnicity, and national origin. Over the course of the study, they discussed which areas of New York City they considered to be safe, which they considered to be dangerous, and which they considered to be locations in which they felt belonging, as well was what factors influenced those emotions. They also discussed their daily routines and practices of movement throughout the city, as well as how these practices and emotions have changed over time.
Through these methods, it was found that participants had strong connections and feelings of belonging toward specific places and things: their homes, their families and friends, and the educational institutions they attended. Participants also reported a particular preference for spaces that are highly diverse and multicultural. Yet overall, participants reported feeling as if they would be able to feel safe anywhere in the entirety of New York City, and did not report feeling in danger very often in their daily lives. Furthermore, participants also often constructed imagined geographies of places they had never been, especially places outside of the United States, as locations of danger and not-belonging. Finally, in terms of practices around space, participants enjoyed spending time in large, popular public spaces. I theorize that these emotions, affects, and practices constitute the formation of a habitus specific to young migrants of the kind studied in this thesis; furthermore, I also theorize that this habitus serves as a means of political resistance against anti-migrant forces and discourses.