A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Semantically Clustered Words Are
Stored With Integrated Context
Validating a Measurement Model for Source Memory,
Storage, and Retrieval in Free Recall
Arndt Bröder
University of Bonn and Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany
Abstract. Source memory (i.e., memory for context) has been studied with recognition tasks almost exclusively. However, encoding context
affects recall stronger than recognition, presumably because of more complex retrieval strategies in the former task. An extension of Batchelder
and Riefer (1980) pair-clustering model is proposed which is intended to measure the storage and retrieval of clusterable word pairs as well as the
memory for the sources in which these were presented. In two experiments, the construct validity of the central model parameters is
demonstrated. Furthermore, there was a strong stochastic dependency between recalling the sources of the first and the second word of a clustered
pair, respectively, suggesting that not only semantic but also contextual features are bound together in clustered pairs. Advantages of using recall
tests in source monitoring research are discussed.
Keywords: source memory, free recall, multinomial modeling
‘‘Source memory’’ refers to the recollection of contextual
aspects that accompanied the encoding of information and
qualifies the content of this memory trace as ‘‘episodic’’
memory. Various active retrieval, judgment, and recon-
struction processes interact to produce source memory,
and to emphasize the active role of deliberate reconstruc-
tion, Johnson, Hashtroudi, and Lindsay (1993) introduced
the term source monitoring. The multitude of processes
involved poses a problem for usual descriptive and athe-
oretical ad hoc measures of source memory performance
because these often confound item recollection, source
recollection, item guessing biases, and source guessing
biases (Batchelder & Riefer, 1990; Bayen, Murnane, &
Erdfelder, 1996; Murnane & Bayen, 1996; Vogt &
Bro¨der, 2007).
1
Therefore, multinomial models have been
proposed to disentangle the processes in order to obtain
more process-pure measures (Batchelder & Riefer, 1990;
Bayen et al., 1996; Bro¨der & Meiser, 2007; Meiser &
Bro¨der, 2002).
However, almost all empirical research on source
memory hitherto employed recognition tasks, and conse-
quently, multinomial models as well as signal detection
models (e.g., DeCarlo, 2003) are tailored to this paradigm.
In the recognition source memory task, participants are first
confronted with items that are presented in (at least) two
different sources, for example, speakers, locations on the
computer screen, or word lists. Later, they are shown old
items from the different sources as well as new foils, and
they have to decide for each item whether it came from
Source A, Source B, or whether it is new. This implies an
old-new judgment as well as a source judgment.
Several lines of research seem to imply that item
memory and source memory are dissociable to a certain
extent. For example, item and source memory appear to
be differentially affected by factors such as age, dementia,
amnesia, or frontal lobe dysfunction (Glisky, Polster, &
Rothieux, 1995; Multhaup & Balota, 1997; Shimamura
& Squire, 1987; Spencer & Raz, 1995). On the other hand,
Glanzer, Hilford, and Kim (2004) emphasized a functional
dependency between both kinds of memories by claiming
that any variable that enhances item memory will also
enhance source memory. In five experiments they found
support for this claim. The diverging results may partly
be attributed to the exclusive use of recognition tests in this
area. It has long been known that context has a stronger
effect on memory measures derived from free recall tests
than from recognition tests (e.g., Smith & Vela, 2001).
This may be attributed to the fact that in recognition,
1
‘‘Guessing bias’’ is used here as an umbrella term for strategic reconstruction processes informed either by bottom-up or by top-down
information. For example, the tendency to attribute an item to a specific source could be influenced by its similarity to other items of that
source (bottom-up) or by metacognitive expectations (top-down, ‘‘He would never have said that’’).
Zeitschrift fu¨ r Psychologie / Journal of Psychology 2009; Vol. 217(3):136–148
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.136
2009 Hogrefe Publishing
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.