ArticlePDF Available

The importance of cigarette packaging in a 'dark' market: the 'Silk Cut' experience

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

In a growing number of countries tobacco companies are severely restricted in how they can legally market their products. In these 'dark' markets the role of packaging as a promotional and communications tool becomes more pronounced. How packaging is used for the most expensive cigarette brands in dark markets has received limited attention however, even though these 'premium' cigarette brands significantly impact upon the profitability of tobacco companies. We outline, using retail trade press journals, how packaging was used for premium brand 'Silk Cut' in the UK from 2004 to 2011, following a comprehensive ban on tobacco advertising, promotions and sponsorship. From 2004 to 2008 packaging was used to help launch two new variants and during this period Silk Cut market share of the premium sector grew by 1.1%. Overall share of the cigarette market for the Silk Cut house (brand family) fell however due to the continuing decline of the premium sector. From 2008 to 2011 changes to the packaging were much more frequent, including the repeated use of limited-edition designs, and modifications to pack shape, texture, style of opening, cellophane, foil and inner frame. Silk Cut's share of the premium sector grew a further 2.9% from 2008 to 2011, and overall cigarette market share increased. That a premium brand can report any level of growth within such a hostile market, where most advertising, promotion and sponsorship is banned, taxation is among the highest in the world, and in the midst of a recession, is testament to the value of packaging.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The importance of cigarette packaging in a dark
market: the Silk Cutexperience
Crawford Moodie,
1
Kathryn Angus,
1
Allison Ford
1,2
1
Centre for Tobacco Control
Research, Institute for Social
Marketing, University of
Stirling, Stirling, Scotland
2
UK Centre for Tobacco
Control Studies, Stirling, UK
Correspondence to
Dr Crawford Moodie, Centre
for Tobacco Control Research,
Institute for Social Marketing,
University of Stirling, Stirling
FK9 4LA, UK;
c.s.moodie@stir.ac.uk
Received 5 July 2012
Accepted 18 October 2012
Published Online First
14 November 2012
To cite: Moodie C,
Angus K, Ford A. Tob
Control 2014;23:274278.
ABSTRACT
In a growing number of countries tobacco companies are
severely restricted in how they can legally market their
products. In these darkmarkets the role of packaging
as a promotional and communications tool becomes
more pronounced. How packaging is used for the most
expensive cigarette brands in dark markets has received
limited attention however, even though these premium
cigarette brands signicantly impact upon the
protability of tobacco companies. We outline, using
retail trade press journals, how packaging was used for
premium brand Silk Cutin the UK from 2004 to 2011,
following a comprehensive ban on tobacco advertising,
promotions and sponsorship. From 2004 to 2008
packaging was used to help launch two new variants
and during this period Silk Cut market share of the
premium sector grew by 1.1%. Overall share of the
cigarette market for the Silk Cut house (brand family) fell
however due to the continuing decline of the premium
sector. From 2008 to 2011 changes to the packaging
were much more frequent, including the repeated use of
limited-edition designs, and modications to pack shape,
texture, style of opening, cellophane, foil and inner
frame. Silk Cuts share of the premium sector grew a
further 2.9% from 2008 to 2011, and overall cigarette
market share increased. That a premium brand can
report any level of growth within such a hostile market,
where most advertising, promotion and sponsorship is
banned, taxation is among the highest in the world, and
in the midst of a recession, is testament to the value of
packaging.
INTRODUCTION
The WHOs Framework Convention on Tobacco
Control
1
is one of the most widely embraced treat-
ies in the history of the United Nations, and
includes a number of provisions for reducing the
supply and demand for tobacco. One of these pro-
visions for reducing demand involves banning
tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship.
Nineteen countries are reported to have complete
bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and spon-
sorship, as of 2009, with an additional 101 coun-
tries having comprehensive bans, where tobacco
advertising, promotion and sponsorship in trad-
itional media (TV, radio and print) is banned, as is
some, but not all, direct or indirect tobacco adver-
tising.
2
That 120 countries have wide-ranging con-
trols on how tobacco products can be marketed
represents signicant progress for global tobacco
control, while acknowledging that there are still 74
countries with only partial controls on how
tobacco can be advertised and promoted.
2
An aspir-
ation for global tobacco control will be to continue
to increase the number of residents living in
countries with complete bans, with 425 million
people already reported to be fully protected
against tobacco industry marketing tactics.
2
The
problem with these supposedly complete bans is
that they do not include branded packaging, even
though packaging is well established as a multifunc-
tional promotional and communications tool
36
and has been used as such by tobacco companies
since the late 19th century.
78
While tobacco packaging has long had a key mar-
keting function this becomes more pronounced in
countries with comprehensive bans on legal
tobacco marketing activity,
9
or darkmarkets.
Within these dark markets the importance of pack-
aging is accentuated for all tobacco products but
particularly for cigarette brands positioned within
the premiumsector, given that globally the cigar-
ette remains the most popular of all tobacco pro-
ducts, and shows no sign of losing its market
dominance,
10
and premium brands provide higher
prot margins for tobacco companies than cheaper
brands.
11
Indeed, the prot shared between the
manufacturer, distributor and retailer after duties,
taxes and production costs can be several times
higher for a premium brand than for an ultra-low
priced brand,
11
and packaging can be an important
way to help justify the higher price of these
premium brands and protect against down trading
to cheaper brands.
Convincing consumers and particularly new
market entrants of the premium nature of a cigar-
ette brand presents a challenge for tobacco com-
panies when there are few remaining marketing
tools available to support its positioning as a higher
priced product. This task has not been helped
recently by a global recession, the rising number of
countries adopting picture health warnings on cig-
arette packs and the long-term decline of the
premium cigarette sector in many established
markets. For instance, according to retail journals
in the UK, in 2011 the premium cigarette sector
accounted for almost a quarter (23.0%) of the total
cigarette market, dropping from 26.7% in 2008,
31.0% in 2005 and 35.1% in 2002.
1215
This
represents a decline of approximately 4% every
3 years and down trading is forecast to continue in
the UK, as in many other markets, due to lingering
economic uncertainty, rising unemployment, a
decline in household income and higher cigarette
prices.
16
There has, instead, been growing con-
sumer demand for cheaper alternatives such as
value brand cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco
and make-your-own cigarettes.
With the continuing growth of the value end of
the tobacco market in the UK the future for cigar-
ettes positioned within the premium category looks
274 Moodie C, et al.Tob Control 2014;23:274278. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681
Special communication
group.bmj.com on April 12, 2014 - Published by tobaccocontrol.bmj.comDownloaded from
bleak. We consider how one of these premium brands, Silk Cut,
is faring in these austere times and how packaging, one of the
last avenues left to promote the brand, has been used for the
Silk Cut house. Silk Cut was rst introduced in the 1890s but
withdrawn from market in 1910. It was relaunched in 1964 as
the rst cigarette brand to have a low-tarproposition in the
UK, and by the 1970s was established as the leading low-tar
brand.
17
It should be noted that it has since been established
that lower tar levels are not an indicator of reduced harm.
18
By
the early 1980s sales had plateaued
19
and the brand owner,
Gallaher, recruited advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi to
revive the brand. On the back of their successful Cut Silk
advertising campaign,
20
launched in 1983, which typically
showed images of purple silk but without any pack shots, depic-
tions of smoking or indeed mention of the brand,
6
market share
grew between 1984 and 1990.
17
The launch and relaunch of
two Silk Cut variants (Extra Mildand Ultrarespectively) are
reported to have helped stop the brand losing momentum in the
early 1990s as other, typically lower-priced, low-tar competitors
entered the marketplace.
21
The success of these variants stimu-
lated market share growth of the Silk Cut house until 1995
20
but by the late 1990s Silk Cut was a brand in decline. Although
Silk Cut Ultra had helped compensate for this decline, sales of
Ultra were beginning to wane.
17
The 21st century transformed
the tobacco marketing landscape in the UK, as it has done else-
where. Between February and July 2003 the rst phase of the
Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act (TAPA)
22
prohibited
promotions and direct mail, product placement, domestic sports
and cultural sponsorship and advertising on billboards, the
internet, cinema, newspapers and magazines. In December 2004
the TAPA restricted tobacco advertising at the point-of-sale
(POS) to a single A5 size advertisement and in July 2005 brand
sharing and international sponsorship was banned; while
domestic tobacco sponsorship ended in 2003, global sporting
events which involved tobacco sponsorship (such as Formula 1
and the World Snooker Championship) were given special dis-
pensation until 2005.
The TAPA however placed no restrictions on tobacco pack-
aging or tobacco displays at POS. A number of countries have
now banned the open display of tobacco products at the POS,
and in doing so have removed the opportunity for packaging to
be showcased instore. It is well established in the marketing lit-
erature however that packaging has an important function both
within and outside the retail environment.
23
By sourcing mater-
ial from trade press journals (Convenience Store, Forecourt
Trader, Off Licence News, Talking Retail and The Grocer), we
outline how packaging has been used for the Silk Cut house
since January 2004, after the rst and most wide-reaching phase
of the TAPA was implemented. In April 2004 Gallaher became
the rst tobacco company to launch a new brand variant after
the advertising ban, Silk Cut Slims, aiming to make an impact
through eye-catchingpackaging (see gure 1) and posters on
tobacco displays at the POS, which were still permitted at the
time.
24
Maximising marketing channel opportunities, in this
case posters on tobacco displays, while they are still permitted is
a known tobacco industry strategy.
25 26
This focus on POS and
the packaging can be traced back to internal tobacco industry
documents from the 1990s. At this time Gallaher predicted that
Post ad ban the only way that we will be able to give Silk Cut
ongoing brand differentiation from other low-tar brands, will be
at the POS, on the packaging itself.
20
In December 2004 the king size range was given a softer feel
with new bevel-edged packs, an innovative packaging develop-
ment at the time in the UK, which Gallaher claimed were better
to hold and a more premium offering.
27
When bevel-edged
packs were subsequently introduced in Canada, in 2005, the
vice-president of marketing for Imperial Tobacco added that
such packs also help attract consumer attention in a market with
limited opportunities for advertising and promotion.
28
There
were no new variants or further changes to the packaging of the
Silk Cut range until March 2007, when Silk Cut Graphite was
launched in bevel-edged packs. Although given shelf standout,
29
Graphite was subsequently withdrawn from market. The regu-
larity of packaging alterations increased markedly from 2008
onwards. In June 2008 a leaf emblem was placed on the side
of Silk Cut Purple and Silk Cut Silver packs to reinforce its pos-
ition as a low-tar brand;
30
in advance of the 2003 ban on mis-
leading product descriptors in the European Union, Silk Cut
King Size, Ultra Low and Extra Mild were renamed as Silk Cut
Purple, Silver and Blue respectively. Replacing descriptors such
as Ultra Low, Light or Mild with colour descriptors to commu-
nicate tar levels is a widely recognised response to bans on mis-
leading product descriptors.
26
In October 2008 Silk Cut Superslims was launched in
slimmer perfumetype packs
31
(see gure 1). The compact size
Superslims pack, a rst in the UK market, represented a radical
departure from existing packaging in the UK and experienced
122% growth between 2008 and 2009 according to Japan
Tobacco International ( JTI), who acquired the Gallaher Group
in 2007.
32
A number of tobacco companies have since
Figure 1 Silk Cut Slims, Menthol
(limited edition cellophane), Silver
tactile pack, Purple Superslims (limited
edition oral design).
Moodie C, et al.Tob Control 2014;23:274278. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681 275
Special communication
group.bmj.com on April 12, 2014 - Published by tobaccocontrol.bmj.comDownloaded from
introduced superslims products to market, consistent with inter-
national trends where the superslims segment is reported to
have grown 10 times faster than the overall market from 2007
to 2011.
33
In December 2008 another brand variant, Silk Cut
Menthol, was launched in hexagonal shaped packs to bring
sophistication to the premium king size menthol sector.
34
It fea-
tured a limited-edition design on the cellophane wrapper (see
gure 1) and was supported, at least on gantries owned by
Japan Tobacco International, with an A5 Silk Cut Menthol
graphic.
35
And in April 2009 limited-edition bevel-edged Silk
Cut packs, featuring ve designs based on the word Cut
(diamond cut, power cut, short cut, precision cut, directors cut)
were available for Silk Cut Purple, Silk Cut Blue and Silk Cut
Silver.
36
Although the use of limited-edition packaging is not a
recent trend in the UK, or elsewhere, it has become increasingly
common since the TAPA.
23
Limited edition packaging can help
increase the number and speed of sales, introduce a collectors
mentality to the buyer, have a lasting impact on brand percep-
tions once they have sold out, and in dark markets create inn-
ite relaunch opportunities for brands which cannot be
supported by other marketing.
53738
In March 2010 touchpacks were introduced for the Silk
Cut king size range with a textured feel, which was initially
communicated by a pack insert with the new touchtexture
and then subsequently via the cellophane with the message feel
the new SILK CUT.
39
This was the second example of tactile
packaging in the UK, following the introduction of Marlboro
Bright Leaf in 2009, but the rst for a low-tar product. As touch
provides an important means of developing an emotional or
affective connection with a package, particularly those touched
most frequently,
40
the use of texturing or lacquering on packs to
create a tactile sensation is tailor-made for tobacco products and
a number of tactile packs have since been brought to market.
Indeed, the use of multisensory cigarette packaging which
appeals to both sight and touch, smell or even sound, has
started to penetrate the European market within the last few
years and this trend looks certain to continue.
41
For instance,
Lucky Strike audition packs, which make a distinctive clicking
sound when the lid is closed, were introduced in Sweden in
2011; a scented Virginia Slims pack was available in Russia in
2009;
42
and tactile packs can now be found throughout Europe.
In July 2010 limited-edition Silk Cut Superslims packs with
oral designs were introduced
43
and in September of this same
year packs containing 14 cigarettes (see gure 2), rather than
the standard 10 or 20, were introduced for Silk Cut Purple as
an alternative to down trading and to boost the range.
44
In
respect to pack size, Article 16.3 of the Framework Convention
on Tobacco Control states that parties should endeavour to pro-
hibit the sales of cigarettes in small packets, as this increases
the affordability of such products to minors.
1
For those coun-
tries that do not have a minimum pack size, or as is the case in
the UK, a minimum pack size of only 10, tobacco companies
are free to introduce these smaller packets. In November 2010
Silk Cut Menthol featured packs with three limited-edition
designs and green, instead of the usual silver, inner foil.
45
Tobacco industry journals highlight the value of the inner foil,
regarded as the nal part of the brand experience before reach-
ing the cigarettes
46
and a decorative enhancement considered to
increase overall appeal, heighten brand identity and create
higher purchase intent.
47 48
In June 2011 the limited-edition V-pack (gure 2), with an
innovative method of opening and inner frame, was introduced
for the king size range.
49
These previous examples (gure 3)
show that it is not only the graphical and structural design of
packaging, including imagery, colour, size, shape, texture and
style of opening, which has been used to enhance appeal for the
Figure 2 Silk Cut Purple 14 pack,
Menthol (limited edition design and
foil), Blue V-pack, Choice.
Figure 3 Timeline of packaging developments for the Silk Cut house from 2004 to 2011 (using data from online and print UK retail trade press).
276 Moodie C, et al.Tob Control 2014;23:274278. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681
Special communication
group.bmj.com on April 12, 2014 - Published by tobaccocontrol.bmj.comDownloaded from
Silk Cut house, but also other pack elements such as the cello-
phane, foil and inserts. In October three limited-edition
Autumn/Winter pack designs were introduced for Silk Cut
Purple, Silver and Blue, this time featuring an acorn, leaves or
an ice cube to represent the changing seasons.
50
Most recently,
in December 2011, new brand variant Silk Cut Choice was
brought to market. Choicehas a capsule in the lter which can
be burst to change the avour of the cigarette to menthol.
Although the rst such product in the UK market, it was quickly
followed by Lucky Strike Click & Roll, Pall Mall Click On,
Lambert & Butler Fresh Burst, Benson & Hedges Dualand
Vogue Perle Capsule. Similar products are now available across
most of the world, since being rst introduced in Japan in
2007,
51
but the fact that three tobacco companies released six
similar product offerings within 6 months provides an insight
into the importance of new product development,
52
communi-
cated in all cases via the packaging (gure 2).
Silk Cuts market share within the premium cigarette segment
has grown for seven consecutive years, since the ban on tobacco
advertising, promotion and domestic sponsorship,
53
from 14.7%
in 2004 to 15.8% in 2008 and 18.7% in 2011.
34 54
Based upon
the size of the premium sector and Silk Cuts share of this sector,
overall share of the cigarette market for Silk Cut declined from
2004 to 2008, but increased from 2008 to 2011. Considering
the move away from premium cigarettes in the UK since the
mid-1990s
20
the fact that a premium cigarette brand, supported
only by the packaging, is able to experience any growth is testa-
ment to the value of the packaging. This growth in overall cigar-
ette market share from 2008 onwards is even more striking given
that the UK entered a recession in the second quarter of 2008,
16
is reported to be suffering from the longest economic depression
in a century
55
and has taxation on cigarettes which is now among
the highest in the world.
56
In addition, picture health warnings
were introduced on packs during this time, although only on the
reverse panel of packs, and the UK is regarded as having the
strongest tobacco control in Europe.
57
The Silk Cut experience, that is the success of a premium
brand in an increasingly hostile market, helps explain why a
tobacco industry journal alludes to packaging as the last chance
marketing saloon.
37
The fact that packaging can be used to suc-
cessfully promote the most expensive tobacco products in the
UK has implications for other countries, whether they have
strong controls on tobacco marketing or have not yet reached
this point. Australia is an exception as the Commonwealth
Government has been the rst to call time, with plain pack-
aging to be fully implemented by December 2012. By introdu-
cing such a measure, Australia can lay claim to being the
country with the most completemarketing ban. However, with
only 0.3% of global cigarette sales
58
and volumes predicted to
decline in Australia,
59
the marketing saloonremains very much
open for business elsewhere.
What this study adds
It is widely accepted that tobacco packaging is an important
promotional and communications tool. What is less well
known is how packaging is used for premium cigarette
brands following comprehensive bans on tobacco
advertising, sponsorship and promotion.
This paper details how packaging has been used for a
premium cigarette brand, Silk Cut, following an advertising
ban in the UK.
Aside from the graphical and structural design of packaging,
including imagery, colour, size, shape, texture and style of
opening, other elements of the packaging, including the
cellophane, foil, inner frame and inserts, have all been used
to enhance appeal for the Silk Cut house.
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Professors Sally Haw, Ann
McNeill, Amanda Amos and Linda Bauld for their comments on earlier drafts of this
paper.
Contributors All authors were actively and substantially involved in drafting the
article and nal approval of the version to be published.
Funding This work was supported by Cancer Research UK grant number C312/A8721.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
REFERENCES
1 World Health Organization. WHO framework convention on tobacco control.
Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
2 WHO. WHO Report on The Global Tobacco Epidemic. Warning About The Dangers
of Tobacco. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2011.
3 Slade J. The pack as advertisement. Tob Control 1997;6:16970.
4 Wakeeld M, Morley C, Horan JK, et al. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence
from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002;11:7380.
5 Ford A, Moodie C, Hastings GB. The role of packaging for consumer products:
understanding the move towards plaintobacco packaging. Addict Res Theory
2012;20:33947.
6 National Cancer Institute. Tobacco Control Monograph 19: The Role of the Media
in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco Use. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute,
2008.
7 Mullen C. Cigarette pack art. London: Hamlyn, 1979.
8 Thibodeau M, Martin J. Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Branding, and Design in
Cigarette Packaging. New York: Abbeville Press, 2000.
9 Moodie C, Hastings GB. Making the pack the hero, tobacco industry response to
marketing restrictions in the UK: Findings from a long-term audit. Int J Ment Health
Addiction 2011;9:24.
10 Hedley D. Imponderables and X factorsforecasting the tobacco future. Tobacco
Proles, Tob J Internat 2011:248.
11 Department of Health. Standardised Packaging for Tobacco Products.IA No. 3080.
London: Department of Health, 2012.
12 The Grocer. The best selling cigarette brands generate prot and footfall. The
Grocer, 2002. http://www.thegrocer.co.uk/
topics/-the-bestselling-cigarette-brands-generate-prot-and-footfa/73550.article
(accessed 2 Sep 2012.
13 Forecourt Trader. Under re. Forecourt Trader, 1 Jan 2005. http://www.
forecourttrader.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/250/Under_re.html (accessed 2 Sep
2012).
14 Convenience Store. The vital statistics. Convenience Store, 30 May 2008. http://
www.conveniencestore.co.uk/product-news/the-vital-statistics/191638.article
(accessed 2 Sep 2012).
15 Talking Retail. JTI to launch UKsrst capsule lter cigaretteSilk Cut Choice.
Talking Retail, 18 Nov 2011. http://www.talkingretail.com/products/product-news/
jti-to-launch-uks-rst-capsule-lter-cigarette-silk-cut-choice (accessed 1 Mar 2012).
16 Bishop L. Cigarettes & tobacco market report 2011. Richmond on Thames, England:
Key Note Publications, 2011.
17 M&C Saatchi. Silk Cut creative briefs, 1997. http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/
0500-0599/0517.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2012).
18 Kozlowski LT, OConnor RJ, Sweeney CT. Cigarette design. In: Anonymous. National
Cancer Institute. Monograph No 13: Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with
low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. Bethesda, MD: US National
Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, NCI Smoking and Tobacco Control,
2001:1337.
19 The Grocer. Cut! The fat lady has sung. The Grocer, 1 June 2007.
20 Gallaher Group. Silk Cut planning day. 1998. http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/
0400-0499/0432.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2012).
21 M&C Saatchi. Research proposal: New Silk Cut brand, 1999. http://www.
tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0500-0599/0554.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2012).
22 H.M. Government. Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act 2002. London:
Stationery Ofce, 2002.
23 Centre for Tobacco Control Research. The Packaging of Tobacco Products. Stirling:
Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling, 2012. http://www.
cancerresearchuk.org/prod_consump/groups/cr_common/@nre/@new/@pre/
documents/generalcontent/cr_086687.pdf (accessed 2 Sep 2012).
Moodie C, et al.Tob Control 2014;23:274278. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681 277
Special communication
group.bmj.com on April 12, 2014 - Published by tobaccocontrol.bmj.comDownloaded from
24 Mowbray S. Gallaher tests post-ban market. The Grocer, 10 April 2004. http://www.
thegrocer.co.uk/fmcg/gallaher-tests-post-ban-market/92893.article (accessed 25 Aug
2012).
25 Mowbray S. Silver lining to twilight of tobacco ads. The Grocer, 8 February 2003.
http://www.thegrocer.co.uk/fmcg/silver-lining-to-twilight-of-tobacco-ads/83279.
article (accessed 3 Sep 2012).
26 Anderson SJ, Ling PM, Glantz S. Implications of the federal court order banning the
terms "light" and "mild": what difference could it make? Tob Control
2007;16:2759.
27 The Grocer. Getting a grip. The Grocer 2004:86.
28 Hammond D. Canada: a new angle on packs. Tob Control 2006;15:150.
29 Forecourt Trader. Man appeal. Forecourt Trader, 1 March 2007. http://www.
forecourttrader.co.uk/news/archivestory.php/aid/1645/Man_appeal.html (accessed 25
Aug 2012).
30 Forecourt Trader. The big smoke. Forecourt Trader, 2 June 2008. http://www.
forecourttrader.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/2305/The_big__smoke.html (accessed
25 Aug 2012).
31 The Grocer. Super-slim, elegant Silk Cut for women. The Grocer, 18 Oct 2008.
http://www.thegrocer.co.uk/fmcg/super-slim-elegant-silk-cut-for-women/194249.
article (accessed 9 Sep 2012).
32 JTI. Advertisement for Silk Cut Superslims. Convenience Store, 23 July 2010.
33 Mapother J. Filters. More colour and better carbon. Tob J Internat
2011;4:806.
34 Forecourt Trader. Silk Cut adds style. Forecourt Trader, 1 Dec 2008. http://www.
forecourttrader.co.uk/news/archivestory.php/aid/2640/Silk_Cut_adds_style.html
(accessed 25 Aug 2012).
35 Talking Retail. Silk Cut launches menthol addition. Talking Retail, 21 Nov 2008.
http://www.talkingretail.com/products/product-news/
silk-cut-launches-menthol-addition (accessed 1 Mar 2012).
36 Forecourt Trader. Slow burn. Forecourt Trader, 29 May 2009. http://www.
forecourttrader.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/2931/Slow_burn.html(accessed 25 Aug
2012).
37 Hedley D. Packaging, the last chance marketing saloon. Tob J Internat 2010;2.
38 Hendlin Y, Anderson SJ, Glantz SA. Acceptable rebellion: marketing
hipster aesthetics to sell Camel cigarettes in the US. Tob Control 2010;19:
21322.
39 Off Licence News. Silk cut 20s given textured new look. Off Licence News, 5 March
2010. http://www.oficencenews.co.uk/news/archivestory.php/aid/5251/Silk_Cut_
20s_given_textured_new_look.html (accessed 2 Sep 2012).
40 Spence C, Gallace A. Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer.
Psychol Marketing 2011;28:267308.
41 Moodie C, Stead M, Bauld L, et al.Plain Tobacco Packaging: A Systematic Review.
Stirling: Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling, 2012. http://
phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/papers/PHRC_006_Final_Report.pdf (accessed 2 Sep 2012).
42 Anon. Philip Morris in Russia selling slim cigarettes to women, 2011. http://www.
cigarettesreviews.com/philip-morris-in-russia (accessed 2 Sep 2012).
43 Off Licence News. In brief? Off Licence News, 23 July 2010. http://www.
oficencenews.co.uk/news/archivestory.php/aid/4570/In_brief_.html (accessed 2 Sep
2012).
44 The Grocer. JTI caters for thrifty smokers with 14-packs. The Grocer, 25 Sept 2010.
http://www.thegrocer.co.uk/fmcg/jti-caters-for-thrifty-smokers-with-14-packs/
212768.article (accessed 2 Sep 2012).
45 Talking Retail. Silk Cut Menthol launches limited edition packs. Talking Retail,8
November 2010. http://www.talkingretail.com/products/product-news/
silk-cut-menthol-launches-limited-edition-packs (accessed 25 Feb 2012).
46 Vaassen. Optimise your brand with an inner foil lid. Tob J Internat 2011;2:114.
47 Brinson B. Sexy packs. Tobacco Reporter 2008;3.
48 McEwen W. In dulci jubiloin dulci jubilee! Tob J Internat 2011;6:356.
49 West T. Focus on tobacco: Do it yourself. Forecourt Trader, 9 June 2011. http://
www.forecourttrader.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/4723/Do_it_yourself.html
(accessed 9 Sep 2012).
50 Forecourt Trader. This seasons new look. Forecourt Trader, 6 October 2011. http://
www.forecourttrader.co.uk/news/fullstory.php/aid/5024/This_season_s_new_look.
html (accessed 9 Sep 2012).
51 German Cancer Research Center. Menthol Capsules in Cigarette FiltersIncreasing
The Attractiveness of a Harmful Product. Heidelberg, Germany: German Cancer
Research Center, 2012.
52 Gilmore A. Understanding the vector in order to plan effective tobacco control
policies: An analysis of contemporary tobacco industry materials. Tob Control
2012;21:11926.
53 Walker G. Cash in: TobaccoPremium cigarettes.The Grocer, 6 March 2011.
http://www.conveniencestore.co.uk/advice/products-in-depth/
cash-in-tobacco-premium-cigarettes/216496.article (accessed 9 Sep 2012).
54 Talking Retail. New limited edition pack design for Silk Cut. Talking Retail, 22 Sept
2011. http://www.talkingretail.com/products/product-news/
new-limited-edition-pack-designs-for-silk-cut (accessed 5 May 2012).
55 Inman P. Britains economy sinks into longest depression for 100 years. The
Guardian, 26 April 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/apr/26/
britain-long-depression-100-years (accessed 17 Apr 2012).
56 Eriksen M, Mackay J, Ross H. The tobacco atlas. 4th edn. Atlanta, Georgia:
American Cancer Society, 2012.
57 Joossens L, Raw M. The Tobacco Control Scale 2010 in Europe. http://www.ensp.
org/sites/default/les/TCS_2010_in_Europe_FINAL.pdf (accessed 5 May 2012).
58 Boyle M. Consumers buy death in Australias cigarette package law. Bloomberg
News, 22 April 2012. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-22/
consumers-buy-death-in-australia-s-cigarette-package-law (accessed 25 Apr 2012).
59 Hedley D. Smoke and mirrors and the smoking population. Tobacco Proles, Tob J
Internat 2011;689.
278 Moodie C, et al.Tob Control 2014;23:274278. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681
Special communication
group.bmj.com on April 12, 2014 - Published by tobaccocontrol.bmj.comDownloaded from
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681
2012 2014 23: 274-278 originally published online November 14,Tob Control
Crawford Moodie, Kathryn Angus and Allison Ford
'dark' market: the 'Silk Cut' experience
The importance of cigarette packaging in a
http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/23/3/274.full.html
Updated information and services can be found at:
These include:
References http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/23/3/274.full.html#ref-list-1
This article cites 12 articles, 5 of which can be accessed free at:
service
Email alerting the box at the top right corner of the online article.
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in
Notes
http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
To request permissions go to:
http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform
To order reprints go to:
http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/
To subscribe to BMJ go to:
group.bmj.com on April 12, 2014 - Published by tobaccocontrol.bmj.comDownloaded from
... Zealand, 42 Pakistan, 43 Peru, 45 48 the Philippines, 26 27 43 44 the Republic of Korea, 31 33 54 55 the Russian Federation, 27 43 44 Singapore, 37 Switzerland, 31 Thailand, 27 43 44 Turkey, 43 Ukraine, 43 the UK, 20 33 37 41 43 46 ; 4 studies conducted a content analysis of retail stores 25 40 47 48 ; 18 studies reviewed tobacco industry documents (eg, internal, reports, trade/retail press, ingredient lists), and/or observed the retail environment and/or examined the commercial market data (eg, market portfolio, brand variants, price) 1-3 20 29-32 34 39 42 49 52-57 ; 3 studies conducted a content analysis of print and/or online tobacco advertising and marketing information 28 36 38 ; and 1 study used a cross-sectional survey design 10 (table 1). ...
... 35 37 44 Instructions for how to use the capsule to release the flavour are also conveyed through instructive statements (eg, 'Click to switch', 'Press to change the taste') and/or through brand name descriptors (eg, 'Crush'). 20 24 45 46 50 One study further describes a capsule pack containing an insert with an explanation on how the 'iceball technology' works, along with a customer code to link to the website. 50 In the case of both a menthol ban in Canada 41 and standardised packaging in Singapore, 56 postpolicy capsule packs were more likely to incorporate descriptors in the variant brand names. ...
... Tobacco industry internal documents highlight the additional importance of packaging as promotion especially when other avenues of marketing are constrained, 20 59 66 67 a key promotional strategy used in FCVs. 20 The industry also relies on other less regulated advertising channels for the promotion of FCVs, notably at the point of sale, 3 40 54 55 which has been associated with increased smoking. 68 This is particularly concerning given that several studies in Latin America found high levels of retail availability and advertisements of FCVs among retailers near primary and secondary schools. ...
Article
Objective This systematic review aims to identify marketing elements of flavour capsule variants (FCVs), cigarettes that release flavour when a capsule(s) embedded in the filter is crushed. Data sources A search of original research without restrictions in publication year, population, study design or language using a combination of cigarette and capsule terms was conducted across four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus), indexed until 13 December 2021, along with a citation search. Study selection Studies were included if they presented original research relevant to marketing features of FCVs. Data extraction One author performed data extraction and coded outcomes based on ‘4Ps’ of marketing mix theory: product, place, price and promotion. The second author conducted a cross-check. Data synthesis Of 2436 unduplicated database records and 30 records from other sources, 40 studies were included in the review. Studies were published between 2009 and 2021. Study methodologies primarily included content analysis of cigarette packs/sticks, review of tobacco industry documents and content analysis of advertising information. Findings suggest FCVs are marketed using a mix of strategies, particularly characterised by product innovation, timing market launches around tobacco policies, point-of-sale advertising and packaging to communicate a high-tech, customisable and flavourful product. Conclusion Findings illuminate the marketing strategies of FCVs that are likely driving their global growth, particularly among young people and in low and middle-income countries. Comprehensive tobacco control regulations are needed to close loopholes and curb industry efforts to circumvent existing policies in order to mitigate uptake of FCVs and other product innovations.
... Zealand, 42 Pakistan, 43 Peru, 45 48 the Philippines, 26 27 43 44 the Republic of Korea, 31 33 54 55 the Russian Federation, 27 43 44 Singapore, 37 Switzerland, 31 Thailand, 27 43 44 Turkey, 43 Ukraine, 43 the UK, 20 33 37 41 43 46 ; 4 studies conducted a content analysis of retail stores 25 40 47 48 ; 18 studies reviewed tobacco industry documents (eg, internal, reports, trade/retail press, ingredient lists), and/or observed the retail environment and/or examined the commercial market data (eg, market portfolio, brand variants, price) 1-3 20 29-32 34 39 42 49 52-57 ; 3 studies conducted a content analysis of print and/or online tobacco advertising and marketing information 28 36 38 ; and 1 study used a cross-sectional survey design 10 (table 1). ...
... 35 37 44 Instructions for how to use the capsule to release the flavour are also conveyed through instructive statements (eg, 'Click to switch', 'Press to change the taste') and/or through brand name descriptors (eg, 'Crush'). 20 24 45 46 50 One study further describes a capsule pack containing an insert with an explanation on how the 'iceball technology' works, along with a customer code to link to the website. 50 In the case of both a menthol ban in Canada 41 and standardised packaging in Singapore, 56 postpolicy capsule packs were more likely to incorporate descriptors in the variant brand names. ...
... Tobacco industry internal documents highlight the additional importance of packaging as promotion especially when other avenues of marketing are constrained, 20 59 66 67 a key promotional strategy used in FCVs. 20 The industry also relies on other less regulated advertising channels for the promotion of FCVs, notably at the point of sale, 3 40 54 55 which has been associated with increased smoking. 68 This is particularly concerning given that several studies in Latin America found high levels of retail availability and advertisements of FCVs among retailers near primary and secondary schools. ...
Article
Background Global adoption of standardised packaging requirements for tobacco products is a victory for public health, but their proliferation and impacts rely partly on public support. How this is related to legislation remains underassessed. This study explored change over time in public support for standardised packaging in countries with varying degrees of legislative provisions. Methods We used data from 27 European countries, collected from 2017 (n=28, 300) and 2020 (n=27, 901) waves of the Eurobarometer survey, to assess self-reported support for standardised packaging regulations among both smokers and non-smokers. Countries were grouped into three categories of policy adoption (policy implemented; policy legislated; no legislation) and changes in support were assessed using multilevel Poisson regression models. Results In 2020, public support for standardised packaging was 71% (95% CI 68% to 74%) in countries that implemented standardised packaging legislation, 57% (55% to 60%) in countries that had legislated but not yet implemented legislation and 41% (40%to 42%) in countries with no legislation. Compared with 2017, this represented a relative change of +8% (1% to 15%), +12% (5% to 21%) and −5% (95% CI −2% to −8%), respectively, in the three country categories. Among smokers, there was no indication of change in support across the three groups. Among non-smokers, support increased in countries with existing legislation (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]=1.14, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.23) and decreased in countries with no legislation (aPR=0.93, 0.90 to 0.97). Conclusions Public support for standardised packaging regulations increased in countries implementing and legislating for these measures, particularly among non-smokers. An overall increase in support provides reassurance for policymakers defending policy action on tobacco packaging, as well as for those seeking to implement standardised packaging in their own countries.
... 11 The popularity of menthol cigarettes was primarily due to the introduction, in 2011, of cigarettes with one or more rupturable capsules in the filter which could be burst, by pressing down on the filter, to change the flavor. 12 Prior to the ban, market share of capsule cigarettes was higher in the UK than any other country in Europe and indeed most of the world. 13,14 While capsule and traditional menthol cigarettes are now banned in the UK, it is important to explore how popular these products were among young people to provide some insight into the potential impact of the ban, and to help regulators elsewhere understand the appeal of these products to this population. ...
... The analytical sample consisted of 26 950 11-16 year-olds, representing 22.6% of the total sample for the equivalent age range. Sample demographics for [11][12][13][14][15][16] year-olds are presented in Table 1. The sample was predominantly White (90.8%) with a mean age of 13.2 years. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The use of flavored cigarettes has increased in many countries because of the inclusion of one or more frangible flavor-changing capsules in the filter. Research suggests that these "capsule" cigarettes appeal most to youth, but little is known about how prevalent their use is among children. Methods: A cross-sectional school survey was conducted between September and December 2019 with 11-16 year-olds (N = 119 388) from 198 secondary schools across Wales; the sample represented approximately two-thirds of all 11-16 year-olds in the country. The sample was asked about smoking behavior, with a quarter (N = 26 950) also asked about awareness of menthol cigarettes, and use of menthol and menthol capsule cigarettes if a current smoker (N = 1447). Results: Current smoking prevalence was 5.7% among the entire sample and 5.9% among the analytical sample (those also asked about menthol and menthol capsule cigarettes). For the analytical sample, almost all current smokers (93.2%) were aware of menthol cigarettes, with three-fifths (60.5%) reporting having used menthol cigarettes in the past 30 days (42.3% capsule cigarettes, 18.2% noncapsule cigarettes). In comparison to nonmenthol smokers, those using menthol cigarettes (capsule and noncapsule) were more likely to be frequent smokers, with those using menthol capsule cigarettes more likely to have smoked for longer. Conclusions: While past research suggests that flavored cigarettes appeal to youth, this study shows just how popular these products, and capsule cigarettes, in particular, were among young smokers in Wales. It also raises questions about why capsule cigarettes have received such limited public health attention. Implications: That three in five 11-16 year-old smokers reported using menthol cigarettes in the past 30 days highlights how appealing these products are to young people, particularly capsule cigarettes, used by seventy percent of menthol smokers. Capsule cigarettes are one of the most successful tobacco product innovations in decades, even in countries with comprehensive bans on tobacco marketing and standardized packaging. The dearth of research on capsule cigarettes is a failure of global public health. Evaluation of the ban on characterizing flavors in the United Kingdom and across the European Union is critical.
... 10 Countries looking to restrict the attractiveness of packaging and maximize the visibility of health warning labels should consider adopting the straight edge design. Novel packaging elements keep the cigarette pack effective as a marketing tool 16,21,23,25 and are associated with perceptions of cigarette quality and harm. 20 Plain and standardized packaging can require uniform pack size, shape, texture, method of opening, base color and font; such measures have been found to reduce appeal and uptake of smoking in countries such as Australia. ...
... Research shows that cigarette packages with variations to the standard flip-top pack potentially increase attractiveness and perceived product quality among youth. 20,21 This study has some limitations. Although the systematic protocol used to obtain the packs aimed to maximize the diversity of packs purchased from each country, we were not able to weight the packs to account for the market share of each brand variant in each country because such detailed data are not available. ...
Article
Objectives: The tobacco industry can attract consumers using appealing packaging, including pack structure. We assessed the variety of pack structure elements across select low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: Between 2013 and 2017, we systematically collected 3542 packs from 14 LMICs. The selected countries represented LMICs with the greatest number of smokers. We assessed packs for 4 packaging structure elements: pack-type (hard, soft, or box), pack-shape, pack-edge, and opening-style. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the packag- ing structure elements by country and tobacco company. Results: All 14 countries assessed had predominantly hard packs (88.3% of the total sample). We identified 5 pack-shape variants; the most common pack-shape in all countries was the rectangular non-slim pack-shape (79.2%). Straight right-angled edge packs were the most common in 11 of the 14 countries assessed, but rounded edge packs were the most common in Turkey (58.5%). We found 9 broad categories of pack-opening styles, with the most common being the flip-top (94.5%). Conclusion: Although we found common packaging structure elements across the 14 LMICs, we also noted diverse packaging structures. Restrictions on pack structure elements are important as these elements can contribute to the attractiveness of tobacco products.
... Bu çalışmada Bianca sigarasının ince (slim) paket olması, beyaz ve pembe renklerden oluşmasından dolayı tüm katılımcılar tarafından en az zararlı ve en hafif tada sahip sigara olarak algılandığı görülmüştür. Literatürde (Hammond, Dockrell, Arnott, Lee, & McNeill, 2009;Moodie, Angus, & Ford, 2014) tarafından yapılan çalışmalarda da pembe renkli ve Slim sigaraların katılımcılar üzerinde büyük bir ilgi yaratarak genellikle en çekici olan, en hoş tatta ve en az zararlı sigaralar olarak algılandığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmada Anadolu sigarası ise koyu kırmızı rengi ve düz tasarımlı paketi ile en zararlı ve en sert olarak algılanmıştır. ...
... 19 Currently, there is a gap in the existing literature on the cigarette gifting culture specific to Chinese wedding ceremonies, and on existing Chinese tobacco products branded specifically for weddings. Many previous studies have shown that the cigarette package can be a powerful marketing tool to communicate the brand's image or appeal to specific audiences through content and colour, [20][21][22][23][24] suggesting that packs branded with wedding appeals are also an important tool for promoting cigarette use in China. This study aims to fill the gap by analysing how cigarette packs that are on sale in urban China are branded specifically for wedding ceremonies. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Exchanging or gifting cigarettes is a common practice in Chinese culture, often occurring during weddings to connote celebrations and happiness. We examined Chinese cigarette packs for wedding terminology and imagery to assess the extent to which packs are marketed for such occasions. Methods Cigarette packs were collected from Beijing, Guangzhou, Shanghai, Kunming and Chengdu in February 2017 using a systematic protocol designed to capture unique packs. Packs were coded by two independent coders for text and imagery of traditional Chinese wedding symbols, such as double happiness, dragon and phoenix, and other culturally specific phrases and images associated with weddings in China. Results From the sample of 738 unique cigarette packs, 68 (9.2%) contained either lexical and/or imagery appeals for wedding gifting. Of these 68 packs, 65 contained both lexical and imagery appeals, 1 pack had only a lexical appeal and 2 packs only included an imagery appeal. The most common appeal was ‘double happiness’ found on 56 packs (82.4%) for both lexical and imagery, followed by ‘dragon and phoenix’ found lexically on 12 packs (17.6%), and through imagery on 15 packs (22.1%). Conclusions Chinese tobacco manufacturers take full advantage of the cigarette gifting and sharing culture demonstrated by packs with imagery and terminology specific to weddings. With only a 35% text health warning label, manufacturers have much real estate to make packs attractive for gifting on such occasions. Implementing plain packaging policies may be effective in decreasing gifting attractiveness for cigarette packs.
... For tobacco marketing, prohibitions on social media have usually been preceded by restrictions against such marketing in traditional media, such as television, radio and newspapers. In Australia, the ratcheting up of restrictions over the past 30 years has produced a 'dark market' for tobacco marketing [14]. But a possibility with alcohol would be to start with restrictions in social media or internetbased media and then, if necessary and desirable, work back to other traditional platforms. ...
Article
Full-text available
Smoking prevalence remains high in Europe and widening socioeconomic group differences are driving health inequalities. While plain packaging policies disrupt tobacco industry tactics that sustain smoking, evidence of their equity impact is sparse. This study evaluated the implementation of plain packaging in Ireland in 2018 on consumer responses, overall and by socioeconomic group. Consecutive nationally representative cross-sectional surveys (2018, n=7701 and 2019, n=7382) measured changes in 13 consumer responses among respondents who smoked across three domains: product appeal, health warnings effectiveness, and perceived harmfulness of smoking. Multiple logistic regression-derived adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to compare responses post- versus pre-implementation adjusting for age, gender, educational level, and heaviness of smoking. A stratified analysis examined changes by socioeconomic group indexed using educational level. There were statistically significant changes in consumer responses to plain packaging policy implementation across 7/13 outcomes studied. Five changes were aligned with expected policy impacts (2/6 product appeal outcomes and 3/4 health warning effectiveness outcomes). Two responses were also observed which were not expected policy impacts (1 appeal-related and 1 perceived harm-related outcome). There was no change in five outcomes. Differences in consumer responses between educational groups were generally small, mixed in nature, and indistinguishable when interval estimates of effect were compared. Implementation of plain packaging in Ireland had intended impacts on consumer responses. Including plain packaging requirements in revising the European Union’s legislative frameworks for tobacco control will help build progress towards a Tobacco-Free Europe without exacerbating smoking inequalities.
Article
Full-text available
(From the Executive Summary): This systematic review outlines findings from 37 studies that provide evidence of the impacts of plain tobacco packaging. The review was conducted following the publication of the March 2011 White Paper Healthy Lives: Healthy People which set out a renewed Tobacco Control Plan for England. One of the key actions identified in the plan was to consult on possible options to reduce the promotional impact of tobacco packaging, including plain packaging. This systematic review was commissioned to provide a comprehensive overview of evidence on the impact of plain packaging in order to inform a public consultation on the issue.
Article
Full-text available
The Australian Government intends to introduce plain tobacco packaging in 2012. We consider whether such a move appears justified by examining the wider marketing literature in order to understand the role that packaging has for consumer goods. Packaging is often called the fifth ‘p’ of the marketing mix. It is an effective marketing medium for all consumer products and helps build consumer relationships through possession and usage. Common packaging strategies to promote the product, distinguish products from competitors, communicate brand values and target specific consumer groups include innovative, special edition, value and green packaging. These strategies, combined with the visual and structural aspects of packaging design, such as colour, size and shape, influence consumer perceptions and purchase and usage behaviour. This gives packaging an important role at point-of-purchase and also post-purchase. Packaging also has a close relationship with the product, influencing perceived product attributes, and is a key representative of the brand. We conclude that plain tobacco packaging appears justified, based on the importance of packaging as a promotional tool, and will fundamentally restrict the opportunity for tobacco companies to influence consumers through package design.
Article
Full-text available
The Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act (TAPA), introduced between 2003 and 2005 in the UK, prohibits all tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Packaging, however, is not covered in the Act. Two strands of a long-term audit (trade press review and panel of smokers) are examined to monitor change in tobacco packaging from January 2002 to January 2009. The trade press provides numerous examples of value based (altered pack size or price marked packaging), image based (altered pack design) and innovation based (pack additions or modifications) packaging. Some examples of value, image and innovation based packaging are reported in the trade press from 2002 to 2004, but mention of all three forms of packaging increases markedly from 2005 onwards, as other forms of marketing were restricted. These developments have been observed by a panel of smokers, from across the UK, who have been particularly attentive to, and aware of, value based packaging. Packaging has become an increasingly important promotional tool for the tobacco industry as other channels have been shut off. It is clear therefore that any comprehensive and consistent tobacco strategy should include a mandatory move to generic packaging. KeywordsTobacco packaging–Trade press–Smoker’s panel–Image–Innovation
Article
Full-text available
This paper builds on tobacco document research by analysing contemporary materials to explore how the global tobacco market has changed, how transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) are responding and the implications for tobacco control. The methods involved analysis of a variety of materials, including tobacco company annual reports, investor relations materials, financial analyst reports, market research reports and data. Once China, where TTCs have little market share, is excluded, global cigarette volumes are already declining. Nevertheless, industry profits continue to increase. This pattern is explained by the pricing power of TTCs-their ability to increase prices faster than volumes fall, a consequence of market failure. Pricing power is now fundamental to the long term future of TTCs. Consequently, and in light of growing regulations, the business model of the TTCs is changing. Product innovation is now a key marketing technique used to drive consumers to buy more expensive (ie, profitable) premium cigarettes. Contrary to established wisdom, high tobacco excise rates, particularly where increases in excise are gradual, can benefit TTCs by enabling price (profit) increases to be disguised. Large intermittent tax increases likely have a greater public health benefit. TTC investments in smokeless tobacco appear designed to eliminate competition between smokeless tobacco and cigarettes, thereby increasing the pricing power of TTCs while enabling them to harness the rhetoric of harm reduction. Monitoring TTCs can inform effective policy development. The value maximising approach of TTCs suggests that a ban on product innovation and more informed tobacco excise policies are needed.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the present work was to understand why and how RJ Reynolds and other tobacco companies have marketed tobacco products to young adult social trendsetting consumers (termed 'hipsters') to recruit trendsetters and average consumers to smoke. Analysis of tobacco industry documents and industry marketing materials. Since 1995, RJ Reynolds developed its marketing campaigns to better suit the lifestyle, image identity and attitudes of hip trendsetters (so-called 'hipsters'), and Camel's brand identity actively shifted to more closely convey the hipster persona. Camel emphasised in-venue events such as promotional music tours to link the brand and smoking to activities and symbols appealing to hipsters and their emulating masses. To reach this targeted and socially valuable trend-setting population, public health advocates must tap into hipster psychology and expose to the targeted community the tobacco company's efforts to infiltrate the hipster community to turn hipsters into tobacco-using role models.
Article
If tobacco advertising and promotion increase cigarette consumption, they are issues for public health policy. Although public health advocates assert that tobacco advertising does increase cigarette consumption, there is a significant empirical literature that finds little or no effect of tobacco advertising on smoking. In this chapter, these empirical studies are examined more closely with several important insights emerging from the analysis. The chapter also provides new empirical research from 102 countries on the effect of tobacco advertising. The primary conclusion of this research is that a com- prehensive set of tobacco advertising bans can reduce tobacco consumption and that a limited set of advertising bans will have little or no effect. The policy options that have been proposed for the control of tobacco advertising include limitations on the content of advertisements, restrictions on the placement of advertising, restrictions on the time that cigarette advertising can be placed on broadcast media, total advertising bans in one or more media, counter-advertising and the taxation of advertising. This analysis concludes that neither restrictions on the content and placement of advertising, nor bans in only one or two media, are effective. However, comprehensive control programs, including comprehensive advertising bans, do reduce cigarette consumption. Counter- advertising, which is the use of media to promote public health, also reduces cigarette consumption. The taxation of advertising also reduces total advertising with the additional advantage of raising revenue that could be used to fund counter-advertising.
Article
Touch plays an important, if often underacknowledged, role in our evaluation/appreciation of many different products. It is unsurprising, therefore, that there has been such a recent growth of interest in “tactile branding” and tactile marketing. This article reviews the evidence from the fields of marketing, psychology, and cognitive neuroscience, demonstrating just how important the feel of a product, not to mention the feel of its packaging, can be in determining people's overall product evaluation. Problems for tactile design associated with the growth of the aging population, and the growth of Internet-based shopping, are highlighted. The critical role that touch can play in multisensory product design, appreciation, and marketing is also discussed, as is the increasingly frequent use by marketers of synesthetic correspondences to evoke tactile sensations via the visual and auditory modalities. We put forward the argument that tactile stimulation may influence multisensory product evaluation by means of affective ventriloquism: Our suggestion is that the hedonic attributes of a product perceived via one modality (such as touch) can “pull” (or bias) a person's estimates of the quality and pleasantness of the product derived from other sensory modalities into alignment, and by so doing, modulate a person's overall (multisensory) product experience. What is more, powerful mathematical modeling approaches now exist to predict the magnitude of this kind of intersensory (or crossmodal) interaction effect, hence offering the promise of a more scientific approach to tactile design/marketing in the coming years. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.