Teaming in qualitative research: Lessons learned

ArticleinInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 7(1):77-88 · January 1994with 11 Reads
Cite this publication
This article discusses lessons learned as a research team conducted a large‐scale, multi‐site qualitative policy study. The lessons call for incorporating a variety of backgrounds and experience, for anticipating enormous complexities amid multiple stages of research and volumes of data, and for building firm commitments across team members as well as to the research itself. The authors contend that four different means of decision making are required when carrying out qualitative research using a research team approach. They counsel against symmetry of contribution by each member. They conclude that teaming as they practiced it was expensive in terms of time, money, and energy; yet if considered in light of effectiveness, teaming provides enormous gains in terms of professional reward and quality research. This paper was supported in part by funds received from the U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the position or policies of this agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Do you want to read the rest of this article?

Request Full-text Paper PDF
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Wendy A Hall
      Wendy A Hall
    • Bonita C. Long
      Bonita C. Long
    • Nicole Bermbach
    • Kathryn Patterson
    Multidisciplinary research teams that include faculty, students, and volunteers can be challenging and enriching for all participants. Although such teams are becoming commonplace, minimal guidance is available about strategies to enhance team effectiveness. In this article, the authors highlight strategies to guide qualitative teamwork through coordination of team members and tasks based on mutual adjustment. Using a grounded theory exemplar, they focus on issues of (a) building the team, (b) developing reflexivity and theoretical sensitivity, (c) tackling analytic and methodological procedures, and (d) developing dissemination guidelines. Sharing information, articulating project goals and elements, acknowledging variation in individual goals, and engaging in reciprocity and respectful collaboration are key elements of mutual adjustment. The authors summarize conclusions about the costs and benefits of the process.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Lisa O'Malley
      Lisa O'Malley
    • Voice Group
    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the challenges and opportunities of collaboration in interpretive consumer research. Design/methodology/approach – The paper reviews literature on research teamwork, particularly on qualitative and international projects. It also provides an account of research collaboration on an interpretive research project across four countries, involving eight researchers. Findings – Despite the cult of individualism in academic life, most articles in leading marketing journals are now written by multi‐author teams. The process and implications of research collaboration, particularly on qualitative and international projects, have received little attention within the marketing literature. Qualitative collaborations call for another layer of reflexivity and attention to the politics and emotions of teamwork. They also require the negotiation of a social contract acceptable to the group and conducive to the emergence of different perspectives throughout the research process. Originality/value – While issues surrounding the researcher‐research participant relationship are well explored in the field, this paper tackles an issue that often remains tacit in the marketing literature, namely the impact of the relationships between researchers. The paper draws on accounts of other research collaborations as well as authors' experiences, and discusses how interpersonal and cross‐cultural dynamics influence the work of interpretive research teams.
  • Article
    • Niks
    • Marina I. (Marina Ines
    Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of British Columbia, 2005. Includes bibliographical references.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Kelly O’Brien
      Kelly O’Brien
    • Tarik Bereket
      Tarik Bereket
    • Marilyn Swinton
    • Patricia Solomon
      Patricia Solomon
    The purpose of this article is to describe our experience using a qualitative team approach and predetermined theoretical framework to assess sensibility of a newly developed HIV disability questionnaire. Two interviewers conducted structured qualitative interviews with 22 adults living with HIV, asking participants how well the questionnaire characterized the disability they experienced living with HIV. Data collection and analysis occurred over six stages with four analysts who met throughout. Strengths of our approach included the ability to assess the sensibility of the questionnaire from the perspective of adults living with HIV, collect and analyze data across multiple sites, establish a systematic team analytical process, and enhance rigour through multiple coding, team reflexivity, and interviewer and analyst triangulation. Challenges included increased resources required to coordinate and implement this approach, differential recruitment rates, initial divergent analytical styles, and the potential to miss emerging codes given the structured nature of the analysis. This article offers a methodological process for researchers to use a qualitative team approach with directed content analysis to assess the sensibility of a new health status questionnaire.
  • Article
    • Ambika Zutshi
      Ambika Zutshi
    • Gael McDonald
    • Linda Kalejs
      Linda Kalejs
    Purpose – Increasing pressure to enhance research coupled with a desire for a broadening of academic input, are prompting greater levels of collaboration. Research collaboration can generate notable benefits but can also pose a variety of challenges. The purpose of this paper is to explore the reasons, facilitators, benefits and challenges of academic collaboration. It also provides suggestions to manage identifiable risks and enhance team dynamics. Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper exploring prior literature in relation to the contentious points of research collaboration, particularly in regard to authorship attribution. Findings – The authors present two checklists that researchers can utilise to ensure the successful completion of collaborative projects. The checklists incorporate the main factors required for effective collaborative work and research, and form a foundation for discussion among team members. Originality/value – The paper draws upon experiences, observations, academic literature and protocols, and provides strategies and recommendations to enhance collaboration and authorship attribution. The two checklists presented in the paper are value‐adding for team members.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Lorelei Lingard
      Lorelei Lingard
    • Catherine Schryer
      Catherine Schryer
    • Marlee M Spafford
      Marlee M Spafford
    • S. L. Campbell
      S. L. Campbell
    This article explores the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary health research team that has been engaged in a qualitative research program for over five years. We draw on sociological theories of power and knowledge to explore our experiences of identity conflict, team socialization, and knowledge production. Structurally, our article integrates individual and group perspectives through personal narratives and collaborative critique as we explore the complex negotiations required to realize and maintain our team dynamic. These negotiations take place not only with one another as particularly positioned individuals, but also with the ideological and organizational forces that structure our scholarly worlds. We conclude with articulating `lessons learned' that we hope will enable other interdisciplinary research teams to realize the rich potential of their collaborative qualitative work.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Dawn E. Trussell
    • Stephanie Paterson
      Stephanie Paterson
    • Shannon Hebblethwaite
    • Meredith Evans
    This article interrogates the experiences of an interdisciplinary research team that engaged in a qualitative research program for over 5 years, beginning with the grant writing process through to knowledge dissemination. We highlight the challenges of constructing shared understanding and developing research synergies, embracing vulnerability and discomfort to advance knowledge, and negotiating risks of legitimacy and transcending disciplinary boundaries. Based on critical reflections from the research team, the findings call attention to the politics of knowledge production, the internal and external obstacles, and the open mindedness and emotional sensitivity necessary for interdisciplinary qualitative research. Emphasis is placed on relational and structural processes and mechanisms to negotiate these challenges and the potential for interdisciplinary research to enhance the significance of scholarly work.
  • Article
    • Meredith A. Whitley
      Meredith A. Whitley
    • William Massey
      William Massey
    Increasingly, qualitative researchers are merging methods, processes and principles from multiple methodologies in all stages of a research study. Naturally, this brings tensions into the research process, with concerns about the integration (and/or lack of attention) of distinct historical, epistemological and theoretical approaches. While there is an emerging discourse connected to these methodological tensions, this often overlooks other tensions that qualitative researchers must navigate as part of a dyad or larger team. This includes tensions related to geography, project evolution, funding, personality, work style and student recruitment, training and supervision. In this paper, we share our experiences collaborating as a dyad on a multi-year qualitative research project that has evolved significantly (and still is), with a merging of methods, processes and principles from multiple methodologies (e.g. grounded theory, narrative inquiry). This evolution also includes shifting authorship and leadership on grants, presentations, publications and student supervision. To complicate matters, we live in different time zones with distinct personalities and work styles, with varying levels of funding and student engagement. We chronicle our experiences in this dyad, exploring the causes/effects of the various tensions and outlining the strategies we have adopted to navigate these tensions (e.g. ongoing reflection, honest communication, humour, dual focus on processes and outcomes). To conclude, we discuss the implications of these challenges, tensions and strategies as they relate to methodological rigour. Our hope is to provide a resource for future generations of qualitative researchers and their supervisors/instructors as they navigate the murky waters of qualitative research dyads.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Linda De George-Walker
      Linda De George-Walker
    • Mark A Tyler
      Mark A Tyler
    Concept mapping has generally been used as a means to increase the depth and breadth of understanding within a particular knowledge domain or discipline. In this paper we trace the deployment of collaborative concept mapping by a research team in higher education and analyse its effectiveness using the crime metaphor of motive, means, and opportunity. This case study exemplifies two iterations of the research team’s collaborative concept map and shows how the process of the construction of such maps enabled the opportunity for team dialogue and coconstruction that was focused, hands-on, and visual. The concept mapping process provided the team with a meaning-making mechanism through which to share understandings and explore the team’s potential capacities.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Basil Tucker
      Basil Tucker
    • Lee David Parker
      Lee David Parker
    • Kenneth A. Merchant
      Kenneth A. Merchant
    The rising incidence of co-authorship in academia generally is well documented. Research collaboration has been argued to bring some specific benefits to researchers, yet the process and outcomes of collaboration is not without its risks and challenges. The crucial decision to collaborate has both short and long-term implications for the research agenda of most academics, yet relatively little evidence-based reflection on co-authorship is to be found in either the general academic or accounting literature. The aim of this paper is therefore to provide foundational insights into accounting journal article co-authorship, including the diversity and commonality of its processes, and their conditioning contexts. Based on interviews with 76 academics from 67 universities in the US, UK, mainland Europe and Australasia, who, in the 2011 calendar year, published their research in seven internationally esteemed accounting research journals, our findings point to productivity or social predilections of researchers driving their decision to co-author, as well as in their evaluation of the benefits and costs they have experienced in co-authoring. Interpreted from the vantage point of Social Exchange Theory, these findings lead to a broad classification of co-authorship styles, each with implications for both early career researchers as well as more experienced academics, in terms of the propensity to foster more satisfactory working relationships, and effectiveness of research outcomes.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • Joanna O. Masingila
      Joanna O. Masingila
    • Patricia P. Tinto
    • Loren Johnson
  • Article
    • Linda Spatig
      Linda Spatig
    • Kathy Seelinger
    • Amy Dillion
    • Kate Conrad
    Drawing on data generated over a five-year period, this narrative chronicles the evolution of a four-woman ethnographic team created to conduct qualitative evaluation research for a Head Start to Public School Transition Demonstration Project in West Virginia. The team transformed itself from a loosely connected hierarchy of individuals to a close-knit group united personally and professionally, and finally to a more egalitarian community of learners. The first step of the transformation grew out of compatible diversity within the group as well as a felt need to band together against outside forces. The final step to what might be called a feminist learning community was facilitated by a leader committed to open, honest, and purposeful attention to feelings and the personal as key ingredients in developing authentic relationships, conducting meaningful research, and advocating for social justice.
  • Article
    • Jennifer Sumsion
      Jennifer Sumsion
    This article contributes to the still small corpus of scholarship about team research through a brief literature review and a case study that aims to provide insights into knowledge production within the context of a research team. In mapping theoretical-methodological shifts in the author's understandings of the (im)possibilities of an investigation of infants' lives in early education settings, it describes a form of 'becoming' that offers possibilities for transcending the often instrumentalist drivers of team research.
  • Article
    • Liora Bresler
      Liora Bresler
    • Judith Davidson
      Judith Davidson
    • Nancy Hertzog
      Nancy Hertzog
    • M. Lemons
      M. Lemons
    Even though much research is collaboratively conducted by groups of researchers, methodological literature is based upon the model of single researcher design. This is true even though much research is conducted by groups of researchers, whether it is graduate students working under a research director or collaboration among colleagues. Based on one case of a music and arts education project in which we participated, we explore in this paper the selected issues that arise in the conduct of qualitative teamwork, considering the unique aspects of team, as opposed to individual research. These include the formation and organisation of the qualitative research team, conduct of the group, and the relationship of these concerns to the interpretation of meaning. It illustrates how collaborative work can lead to a more complex understanding of school music 'genres', as well as school and community dynamics regarding music education.
  • Article
    • Amanda Datnow
      Amanda Datnow
    • Susan Yonezawa
    The goal of this chapter is to discuss a methodology for conducting classroom observations in culturally and linguistically diverse schools implementing externally developed reform designs. The classroom observation strategy discussed in this chapter was developed for a study entitled Scaling Up School Restructuring in Multicultural, Multilingual Contexts. In this study, we conducted longitudinal case studies of 13 elementary schools in Sunland County Public Schools (SCPS), each of which was implementing one or more nationally regarded school reform designs. Assessments of such reform models have become particularly important as the number of schools implementing these models has increased dramatically in the past few years. The passage of the Obey–Porter law, a bipartisan initiative that allocated 150 million federal dollars in the fall of 1998 (and additional funds in subsequent years) to schools willing to adopt research-based reform programs, is evidence of the growing enthusiasm for external models. This was spurred in part by research suggesting that scaling up externally developed school reform models or promising programs may be the best way to systematically raise students' academic achievement (Stringfield et al., 1997). However, we know little about how these reforms can be implemented successfully in districts serving linguistically and culturally diverse student populations. Many externally developed school reform models were developed mindful of schools serving students who speak English as a first language. None of the models was developed specifically for multicultural, multilingual student populations.
  • Chapter
    • Christine A. Barry
    IntroductionProject background and designReflexive tasks to aid the process of awareness and communicationDiscussionSummaryAcknowledgementsReferences
  • Article
    • Jillian Kinzie
      Jillian Kinzie
    • Peter Magolda
    • Adrianna Kezar
      Adrianna Kezar
    • Elizabeth Whitt
      Elizabeth Whitt
    Methodological diversity has enriched higher education research. One area about which little is known is the dynamics of multi-investigator multi-institutional projects. This paper examines what happens inside a large-scale, team-based research project with an emphasis on decision points related to methodology and reporting results. Systematically reflecting on the tensions that emerged during one effort can give license to other investigators to openly discuss and manage more productively the decisions and struggles in their research and avoid pitfalls that could compromise the research endeavor.
  • Article
    • Geoff Troman
      Geoff Troman
    • Bob Jeffrey
      Bob Jeffrey
    There is currently a growth of interest and activity in the area of comparative cross-national partnership research. This is stimulated by methodological, ideological, political and economic developments particularly within the European Union, where European Commission funding has supported numerous projects. Whereas the ‘old’ comparative education focused solely on large-scale quantitative projects to establish differences in educational effectiveness of different nations, the ‘new’ comparative research is developing innovative methodologies in order to undertake studies which take account of tradition, context and national and local education policy (Broadfoot, 2002a, b; Osborn, 2004). Both these forms of research, however, are subject to broadly the same set of methodological issues surrounding their effectiveness.
  • Book
    • Maria Stathopoulou
      Maria Stathopoulou
    This book contributes to the growing field of foreign language teaching and testing by shedding light on mediation between languages. Stathopoulou offers an empirically-grounded definition of mediation as a form of translanguaging and offers tools and methods for further research in multilingual testing. The book explores what cross-language mediation entails, what processes and strategies are involved, and the challenges often faced by mediators. As well as stressing the importance of administering tests which favour cross-language mediation practices, the author encourages the implementation of language programmes which promote the mingling-of-languages idea and target the development of language learners' effective translanguaging practices. Researchers studying translanguaging, multilingualism, multilingual testing and the use of mother tongue in the foreign language classroom will all find this book of interest.
  • Article
    • Christy (Christine) Ann Barry
      Christy (Christine) Ann Barry
    • Nicky Britten
      Nicky Britten
    • Nick Barber
      Nick Barber
    • Fiona anne Stevenson
      Fiona anne Stevenson
    Reflexivity is often described as an individual activity. The authors propose that reflexivity employed as a team activity, through the sharing of reflexive writing (accounts of personal agendas, hidden assumptions, and theoretical definitions) and group discussions about arising issues, can improve the productivity and functioning of qualitative teams and the rigor and quality of the research. The authors review the literature on teamwork, highlighting benefits and pitfalls, and define and discuss the role for reflexivity. They describe their own team and detail how they work together on a project investigating doctor-patient communication about prescribing. The authors present two reflexive tools they have used and show through examples how they have influenced the effectiveness of their team in terms of process, quality, and outcome.
  • Article
    • Philip W. Jackson
  • Policy analysis, educational policy, and management: though a glass darkly
    • Teaming In Qualitative Research Boyd
    TEAMING IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Boyd, W.L. (1988). Policy analysis, educational policy, and management: though a glass darkly? In N.J. Boyan, (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 501-524). New York: Longman.
  • The Ethnograph [Computer program
    • J Seidel
    Seidel, J. (1988). The Ethnograph [Computer program]. Littleton, CO: Qualis Research Associates.
  • Article
    • Alan Peshkin
    It is no more useful for researchers to acknowledge simply that subjectivity is an invariable component of their research than it is for them to assert that their ideal is to achieve objectivity. Acknowledgments and assertions are not sufficient. Beginning with the premise that subjectivity is inevitable, this paper argues that researchers should systematically seek out their subjectivity, not retrospectively when the data have been collected and the analysis is complete, but while their research is actively in progress. The purpose of doing so is to enable researchers to be aware of how their subjectivity may be shaping their inquiry and its outcomes. In this paper I demonstrate the pursuit of my subjectivity in the course of year-long fieldwork in a multiethnic high school.
  • Naturalistic inquiry The science of "muddling through
    • Y Lincoln
    • E Guba
    Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Lindblom, C.A. (1959). The science of "muddling through." Public Administration Review, 27(2), 79-88.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    • David W Johnson
      David W Johnson
    • Robert T. Johnson
    Summary findings from a meta-analysis of 133 research studies of adults comparing the relative effectiveness of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic efforts show that cooperation among adults promotes achievement, positive interpersonal relationships, social support, and self-esteem. (MLF)
  • Article
    • Charles E. Lindblom
    Short courses, books, and articles exhort administrators to make decisions more methodically, but there has been little analysis of the decision-making process now used by public administrators. The usual process is investigated here-and generally defended against proposals for more "scientific" methods. Decisions of individual administrators, of course, must be integrated with decisions of others to form the mosaic of public policy. This integration of individual decisions has become the major concern of organization theory, and the way individuals make decisions necessarily affects the way those decisions are best meshed with others'. In addition, decision-making method relates to allocation of decision-making responsibility-who should make what decision. More "scientific" decision-making also is discussed in this issue: "Tools for Decision-Making in Resources Planning."
  • Chapter
    • Catherine Marshall
    • Gretchen Rossman
      Gretchen Rossman
  • Book
    • Barney G. Glaser
    • Anselm L. Strauss
    Most writing on sociological method has been concerned with how accurate facts can be obtained and how theory can thereby be more rigorously tested. In The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss address the equally Important enterprise of how the discovery of theory from data--systematically obtained and analyzed in social research--can be furthered. The discovery of theory from data--grounded theory--is a major task confronting sociology, for such a theory fits empirical situations, and is understandable to sociologists and laymen alike. Most important, it provides relevant predictions, explanations, interpretations, and applications. In Part I of the book, "Generation Theory by Comparative Analysis," the authors present a strategy whereby sociologists can facilitate the discovery of grounded theory, both substantive and formal. This strategy involves the systematic choice and study of several comparison groups. In Part II, The Flexible Use of Data," the generation of theory from qualitative, especially documentary, and quantitative data Is considered. In Part III, "Implications of Grounded Theory," Glaser and Strauss examine the credibility of grounded theory. The Discovery of Grounded Theory is directed toward improving social scientists' capacity for generating theory that will be relevant to their research. While aimed primarily at sociologists, it will be useful to anyone Interested In studying social phenomena--political, educational, economic, industrial-- especially If their studies are based on qualitative data.
  • Book
    • James P. Spradley