The aim of this study is to examine validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Social Issues Advocacy Scale (Nilsson, Marszalek, Linnemeyer, Bahner, & Misialek, 2011). The sample of this study consisted of 339 undergraduate students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that 21 items and fourdimensional social issues advocacy model (Political and Social Advocacy,
... [Show full abstract] Political Awareness, Social Issue Awareness, and Confronting Discrimination) model was well fit (x²= 452.10, df= 180, RMSEA= .067, CFI= .93, IFI= .93, and SRMR= .053). The internal consistency reliability coefficients of the scale were .88, .86, .87, and .87 for, four subscales, respectively. The corrected item-total correlations ranged from .47 to .80.