The genus Ceratoneis Ehrenberg, as listed in the online Catalogue of Diatom Names
(2007), has 103 names if redundancy of duplicated entries is ignored. It seems quite possible
that most, if not all, of these taxa (and associated names) will end up in different genera, if
they have not already been transferred. Many of the freshwater species of Ceratoneis are
better placed in Hannaea R. Patr. (although some understand Hannaea as synonymous with
Fragilaria Lyngb., e.g. Krammer & Lange-Bertalot 1991, 2000), the marine species better
placed in Cylindrothecea Rabenh. (Medlin & Mann 2007). In short, Ceratoneis has been used
as a ‘dumping ground’ for many unrelated diatom species that happen to have curved valves
and, usually, a central area on the concave side. To make matters worse, typification of
Ceratoneis is controversial and still being debated (Jahn & Kusber 2005, Medlin & Mann
2007). This paper can (mercifully) avoid these contentious issues as we discuss only
specimens named as the species Ceratoneis iyengarii Gonzalves & Gandhi, a taxon described
some 50 plus years ago from a brackish water locality in Mahim Creek, Mumbai (then
Bombay), India (Gonzalves & Gandhi 1952). The original Latin description provided by
Gonzalves & Gandhi is given in Figure 1 ; the English translation provided is as follows:
“Frustules solitary, free-floating. Valves vary strongly arcuate with a prominent gibbosity in
the middle of the concave side, tapering very slightly from the middle towards the poles
which are broadly rounded. Raphe absent on both valves. Pseudoraphe uniformly broad and
distinct, somewhat excentrical. Unilateral central area present, but marked with indistinct
scattered puncta. Striae radial and distinctly punctuate” (Gonzalves & Gandhi 1952, p. 123).
Given the characters usually associated with species of Ceratoneis (curved valves and,
usually, a central area on the concave side) it is no surprise these specimens ended up there.
Only one figure was provided (Gonzalves & Gandhi 1952, p. 124, fig. 1 l), reproduced here as
Figure 2, rotated through 180’. Gonzalves & Gandhi (1952) cite no particular specimens in the
protologue, none that might be interpreted as types (Gonzalves & Gandhi 1952, p. 123
describe it as ‘rare’). 1 Ftustula solitaria Iiberc Ructuantia Valve fortissirna arcuatae,
prominenta tumcscentes ad lateres concavi medium, tenuissinie decr escentcs
a medio in utrumque apicem qui obtuse rotundus est Raphe
in utraque valva abest. Psefidoraphc miformiter lata et distincta,
aliqnantum ex medio exorbitam Area centralis unilateralis adest,
sed indistinctisdinis punctis signatz. Stria la&&! et distincta punc.
tat= Zongi 63-4711.; latit 12-6-13p; S h k 8 in l o p
Gonzalves & Gandhi
6347 pm 69 pm
12.6-13 pm
8 in 10 pm
Specimen on CESH-5-92
Poles: 10.5 p; Centre: 12.3 pm
10 in 10 pm
Fig. 1. Reproduction ofthe Latin description of Cerufoneis iyengarii (Gonzalves & Gandhi 1952, p. 123).
In 2006 Gandhi’s entire diatom collection was donated to the Energy and Wetlands
Research Group at the Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science (IISc),
Bangalore, India and a programme of collection development is currently being implemented,
which will include typifying Gandhi’s taxa as well as digitizing the specimens and many
drawings. Among the slides, a specimen of Ceratoneis iyengarii was found on Slide No.
CESH-5-92 (Dharavi rd [road], [Mahim Creek], brackish water, 23-12-45) that resembled the
illustration in Gonzalves & Gandhi (1952, fig. 1 1).
Gonzalves & Gandhi (1952, p. 123) provided some basic dimensions, which were
compared to the specimen found on No. CESH-5-92 suggesting that they are of similar
dimensions:
This specimen is best considered a lectotype. It is clear that the specimen is neither a
species of Hannaea nor Cylindrothecea; while both valves of the frustule are curved, they
differ in structure from each other: the image is actually of a developing frustule of a species
of Achnanthes Bory. The frustule illustrated in Figures 3 4 , the lectotype, is of an initial
araphid valve (Fig. 3a) coupled with the perizonium of the raphid valve (Fig. 3b) -the raphid
initial cell is not yet formed. Further specimens, from slide no CESH-5-94 ((Dharavi rd [road],
[Mahim Creek], brackish water, 23- 12-45), also show what appears to be a possibly deformed
araphid valve (Fig. 7; maybe a vegetative cell?) and an initial araphid valve also from a
species of Achnanthes (Fig. 8).
Comparison of our Figures 3-6 with Sabbe et al. (2004, fig. 42), who illustrate the
central and lateral bands of the longitudinal perizonium of Achnanthes cf. subsessilis, show a
certain identity in structure and position (see also Roshchin & Chepurnov 1993, for
Achnanthes brevipes var. intermedia (Kiitz.) Cleve; Mizuno, 1994 for Achnanthes javanica f.
subconstricta (Meister) Hust.; Toyoda et al. 2005, for Achnanthes yaquinensis McIntire &
Reimer; and Toyoda et al. 2006, figs 2628 for illustrations of the perizonium and initial
valves of Achnanthes crenulata Grunow). As for the deformed araphid valve in our Figure 7, a
similar valve for Achnanthes longipes C.A. Agardh was illustrated in Chepurnov & Mann
(1999, p. 3), who note “Even during expansion, it was not uncommon for one auxospore to
abort in each pair. The contents of such auxospores looked abnormal (Fig. 1) and they never
developed into initial cells” (for hrther details see Roshchin & Chepumov 1992 and
Chepumov & Mann 1997). Thus, we conclude that Ceratoneis iyengarii is a name that refers to the early part of the
life-cycle of an as yet unidentified species of Achnanthes and its record should be adjusted
accordingly for the diatom flora of India.