ArticlePDF Available

Well-being in competitive sports—The feel-good factor? A review of conceptual considerations of well-being

Authors:

Abstract

This paper summarizes the topic of well-being as it applies to competitive athletes, with a particular focus on definitional and conceptual issues. Established definitions within research on human happiness and flourishing based on the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives are contrasted against definitions applied within sport psychology. The majority of the reviewed sport psychology studies either failed to define well-being or used a variety of labels to describe the construct (e.g., subjective well-being, psychological well-being, mental well-being). A large number of assessments have been used to assess well-being among athletes, but most were applied with only a weak theoretical rationale and did not distinguish between well-being at the global and sport levels. It is concluded that well-being studies within sport psychology have been hampered by conceptual ambiguity, which makes it difficult to compare results across studies and generalize findings in order to develop a sound theoretical base of knowledge. Future research needs to more explicitly define the conceptual framework of well-being and the level (global or context-specific) on which the construct is investigated. Toward this goal, an integrated model is presented to provide a conceptual well-being structure in sport studies, and future directions for research are discussed.
Well-being in competitive sports the feel-good
factor?: A review of conceptual considerations in
well-being research
Carolina Lundqvist
The self-archived postprint version of this journal article is available at Linköping
University Institutional Repository (DiVA):
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-153215
N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original publication.
Lundqvist, C., (2011), Well-being in competitive sports – the feel-good factor?: A review of conceptual
considerations in well-being research, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(2),
109-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2011.584067
Original publication available at:
https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2011.584067
Copyright: Routledge
http://www.routledge.com/
... Essentially these results tell us little about well-being, as well-being is theoretically fused to hedonia or eudaimonia. Well-being has been "treated as a substantially unspecific variable, is inconsistently defined, and is assessed using a variety of theoretically questionable indicators" (117). ...
... The differing philosophical perspectives (hedonia and eudaimonia) of well-being lead to different ways of examination regarding the causes, consequences, and dynamics of well-being (24), and ultimately inconclusive results when looking across the well-being in sport literature. Lundqvist (117) argues that researchers need to explicitly state which perspective they are operating from and if utilizing quantitative methods need to use established measurements that theoretically fit with the chosen well-being perspective. Due to conceptual ambiguity and inconsistent definitions and measurements between studies, it is difficult to compare results, generalize findings, or develop a theoretical base of knowledge (117). ...
... Lundqvist (117) argues that researchers need to explicitly state which perspective they are operating from and if utilizing quantitative methods need to use established measurements that theoretically fit with the chosen well-being perspective. Due to conceptual ambiguity and inconsistent definitions and measurements between studies, it is difficult to compare results, generalize findings, or develop a theoretical base of knowledge (117). With future research clearly stating their well-being perspective, as well as working within theoretical alignment (concepts and measures), we can start to synthesize related well-being research and begin to theoretically understand athlete EWB and how to better support athlete EWB. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this commentary is to critique the application of well-being in the field of sport and exercise psychology and to provide recommendations for future research. Over the last decade well-being has been an increasingly popular concept under investigation. In the field of sport and exercise psychology, numerous scholars have examined and conducted research on well-being of athletes. While this research has resulted in an abundance of findings, there is concern in how the concept of well-being was applied, defined, and measured. The construct of well-being can be traced back to two distinct perspectives, hedonic well-being and eudaimonic well-being. These perspectives of well-being are based on different philosophical assumptions, and while they are compatible, they are theoretically distinct. In sport and exercise psychology, well-being has lacked consistent operationalization and measurement (i.e., theoretical alignment, single dimensions of hedonic or eudaimonic measured to make claims about the broader well-being constructs), is vague and loosely defined, and is often studied in isolation from a well-being perspective (i.e., no theoretical foundation). We conclude by offering three recommendations to move the field of well-being in sport research forward.
... Previous work on PMH in the context of sports coaching is limited in at least two important ways. First, the previous studies have typically measured a single aspect of PMH without specifying a particular dimension (e.g., emotional or psychological well-being; Lundqvist, 2011;Pankow et al., 2023). There is a need for research on PMH in sports coaches who explicitly use the multidimensional model, as through its' use, more differentiated statements regarding the risk and protective factors of PMH can be made. ...
... Well-being is another fundamental aspect of athlete sports development (Henriksen et al., 2020;Reardon et al., 2019). Diener (2009) defined subjective well-being as the presence of positive affect, paired with low negative affect, and high life satisfaction (Diener, 2009;Lundqvist, 2011). A recent meta-analysis (Mossman et al., 2022) showed that correlations between autonomy support and athlete well-being were, on average, strong and positive. ...
Article
The reROOT program teaches coaches 40 behaviors belonging to a need-supportive coaching style (including structure, involvement, and autonomy support), as defined by self-determination theory. This pilot randomized controlled trial, conducted during the COVID-19-related lockdown, evaluated the impact of this 18-hr program on coaching style (e.g., Problems in Sports Questionnaire) and on athlete motivation ( Motivation Underlying Achievement Goals Questionnaire), performance (tactical, technical, physical, and psychological skills), and well-being ( Satisfaction with Life Scale; Positive and Negative Affect Schedule ). Twenty-three sports teams from two universities were randomized in the experimental or the wait-list control condition. Coaches in the experimental condition evaluated autonomy-supportive coaching styles more favorably than those in the control condition at the 1-year follow-up, but not 2 months after the end of the program. Athletes whose coaches participated in the program did not rate them as having a higher need-supportive coaching style, but experienced greater autonomous motivation and (potentially) performance, and under certain circumstances greater well-being and less controlled motivation 2 months after the end of the program compared with the wait-list condition. These findings suggest that the reROOT program could potentially improve readiness to rely on more autonomy-supportive skills and promote some aspects of sports development in athletes.
... past playing career and cultural norms). Therefore, given the life context which surrounds an individual is critical for understanding how they make sense of well-being (Lundqvist 2011), a phenomenological approach can enrich understanding of well-being (Kiefer 2008;Sarvimäki 2006). For instance, rather than capturing objective measurements based on phenomenon prevalence, phenomenological approaches (e.g. ...
... past playing career and cultural norms). Therefore, given the life context which surrounds an individual is critical for understanding how they make sense of well-being (Lundqvist 2011), a phenomenological approach can enrich understanding of well-being (Kiefer 2008;Sarvimäki 2006). For instance, rather than capturing objective measurements based on phenomenon prevalence, phenomenological approaches (e.g. ...
Article
Full-text available
Little is known about how coaches make sense of and experience well-being within their given context as athletes have traditionally been at the forefront of well-being research, which is concerning given coaches are as susceptible to well-being challenges. Considering well-being and coaching comprise of many idiosyncratic and sociocultural interactions, the present study employed a combined bioecological and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach to explore how six professional football coaches make sense of and experience well-being within the context of football clubs. Due to IPA’s contextualist position, commitment to the individual, and ability to empower and give voice, two group experiential themes were created: ‘The endeavour to comprehend coaches’ well-being’, and ‘Volatility of the football coaching profession: fragmented well-being’. Findings showed that football coaches made sense of their well-being by drawing on past playing experiences and sociocultural interactions, with some coaches comprehending well-being as a physical and mental battery. Additionally, several coaches experienced a fragmentation of self and subsequent well-being due to conflicts within and between their ecological niche. A combined bioecological and IPA approach facilitated and enriched how well-being was contextually made sense of and experienced.
... Sports have become integral to our lives and have benefited individuals and society. Engaging in sports is indeed beneficial for physical health and has positive effects on mental, social, and emotional well-being [1]. Numerous studies demonstrate the positive impact of sports on physical health, including reducing the risk of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
There are many factors affecting the sports performance of student-athletes. Describing the association of these factors with their sports performance may help sports administrators and coaches understand student-athletes' needs which could lead to successful sports performance. The study aimed to identify the significant relationship between the profile and sports performance of student-athletes and the subsequent factors: personal factor, psychological factor, coaching factor, academic factor, administrative factor, and health factor. This descriptive correlation research involved 30 male and 40 female student-athletes who answered a modified questionnaire on Factors Affecting Student-Athletes in their Sports Performance. Descriptive statistics including frequency distribution and percentage were used to describe student-athletes' profiles, sports performance, and factors. Also, Pearson r correlation analysis was computed to test the significant relationship of the profile, factors, and sports performance. Results indicated that student-athletes strongly agree that all the factors affect their sports performance, especially personal factor, coaching factor, and psychological factor. Additionally, student-athletes agree that health factor and academic factor affect their sports performance. Furthermore, results also show that student-athletes' profile was not associated with their performance rank. Meanwhile, all factors except academic factor were significantly related to sports performance. Furthermore, based on the findings, a framework for the successful performance of student-athletes was designed, emphasizing more importance on personal factors and administrative factors while also showing the other factors supporting the athlete's development in terms of training and competition. The model framework could be a viable tool to guide sports administrators and coaches on the successful sports performance of student-athletes.
Article
Sport provides a significant role in the lives of athletes; however, both positive and negative mental health effects may occur from sporting experiences, including burnout and/or well-being. A cross-sectional survey was conducted including 685 athletes ( M age = 23.39, SD = 6.22, 71% = male), testing multiple, complementary, self-determination theory hypotheses linked to well-being, and burnout. A multistage modeling approach encompassing confirmatory factor and path analysis was utilized, with results showing significant variance explained for well-being ( R ² = .30) and burnout ( R ² = .35). Several direct effects were found in line with self-determination theory, including between; needs-support and needs-satisfaction (β = 0.48), and needs-control and needs-frustration (β = 0.44); needs-satisfaction and motivational orientation (β = 0.25); needs-satisfaction and well-being (β = 0.37), and needs frustration and burnout (β = 0.25); and motivational orientation and burnout (β = −0.27), and motivational orientation and well-being (β = 0.18). Indirect effects were found for well-being and burnout via coach needs-support, needs-satisfaction, and motivational orientation in sequence (β = 0.24 and β = −0.22, respectively), in addition to burnout via coach needs-control, needs frustration, and motivational orientation in sequence (β = −0.12). To conclude, coach-based, sporting mental health interventions that promote the utilization of needs-supportive behaviors, while also highlighting the need to minimize needs-controlling behaviors, are recommended for the prevention of burnout and the promotion of well-being in athletes.
Article
Full-text available
Validation evidence is provided for scales that measure five aspects of affective well-being in relation to the work context: anxiety-comfort, depression-pleasure, bored-enthusiastic, tiredness-vigour and angry-placid. Confirmatory factor analysis is used to test four alternative structures for the items in the scales in two samples (n = 871, n = 1915). Analyses in both samples support one structure. The final scales have acceptable internal reliability. The unique explanatory power of each scale is suggested by partial correlations with theoretically related variables. Confirmatory factor analysis indicates that the five factor solution has a better fit with the data than other first order solutions with fewer factors. Second order factor analysis shows that two superordinate factors, corresponding to negative and positive affect, can account for the relationships amongst the five first order factors.
Article
Full-text available
Open access download found here https://journals.ku.edu/jis/article/view/10004
Article
The purpose of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the Emotional Recovery Questionnaire (EmRecQ) and to describe athletes' individual response patterns in five repeated assessments using the EmRecQ. Three samples were used. Samples 1 and 2 consisted of 192 and 379 (Mean age 16.4 years, SD = 0.7 and Mean age: 17.0 years, SD = 1.1) elite athletes from different sports. The third sample consisted of 20 (Mean age: 21.3, SD = 19.0) female elite basketball players. The EmRecQ is a 22-item questionnaire that assesses Happiness, Security, Harmony, Love, and Vitality. Results showed acceptable weighted omega reliability and construct reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the a priori specified five-factor correlated model. Case profiles of repeated assessments revealed individual response patterns of the separate EmRecQ subscales that corresponded well with rated training load and total quality of recovery. The findings provide support for the EmRecQ's psychometric properties and applied usefulness.