Perimenopause lost—reframing the end of
JERILYNN C. PRIOR
Centre for Menstrual Cycle and Ovulation Research, University of British Columbia, and
Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
Abstract Ordinary women and official statements confuse and conflate perimenopause—
the long, complex, life phase of higher and chaotic estrogen levels—with the low and stable
estrogen levels of menopause. This paints both perimenopause and menopause with an
inaccurate ‘estrogen deficiency’ brush. Menopause is the hormonal, and (except for hot flushes)
the experiential opposite of perimenopause. This feminist analysis is from my perspective as
physician-scientist who experienced a perimenopause that was scientifically enlightening, but
personally agonizing. Denial of perimenopausal and menopausal differences causes
perimenopause to be ‘lost’ in several ways: (1) we may assume that perimenopause is chronic
rather than ending in a largely asymptomatic menopause; (2) societal taboos isolate us,
depriving us of solidarity with perimenopause ‘survivors’; (3) we are told we have dropping
estrogen levels when our experiences, like pregnancy dreams, tell us the opposite; (4)
gynaecology treats heavy flow with estrogen despite higher perimenopausal estrogen levels; (5)
feminists ignore hormonal changes and attribute perimenopausal symptoms to (real) stresses of
inferior social status and ageing; and (6) many of us thus become menopausal without the
unique, self-actualization experience that perimenopause has the potential to provide. Thus
perimenopause—a valuable transition into knowing and standing up for ourselves—becomes
This feminist critique of current misinformation concerning perimenopause posits that
it is currently (deliberately) misunderstood to mean dropping estrogen levels, wrongly
equated with menopause or, worse yet, entirely ignored. Before describing the six
deficits of ignoring perimenopause, I will provide some historical context for the
dominant estrogen deficiency paradigm. I will also provide and critique current
definitions in women’s ageing. I will put this new knowledge into the context of my own
struggle to personally as well as scientifically understand the hormonal changes of
perimenopause. Finally, I will show that perimenopause, as a unique life phase, is being
Address for correspondence: Professor J. C. Prior, UBC Endocrinology, 2775 Laurel St, Room 4111, Diamond
Health Care Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada. Tel: +1 604 875-5927; Fax: +1 604 875-5915. Email:
Received: 1 May 2006. Accepted: 30 June 2006.
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY,
VOL. 24, NO. 4, NOVEMBER 2006, pp. 323–335
ISSN 0264-6838/print/ISSN 1469-672X/online/06/040323-13
#2006 Society for Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Perimenopause is defined by gynaecology (the recognized authority on women’s
health) as ‘the time preceding normal menopause during which declining ovarian
function causes oligomenorrhea or dysfunctional uterine bleeding, symptoms of
estrogen deficiency and elevated gonadotrophins’ (Nelson et al., 1996, p. 1393). The
above inaccurate and hormonally incongruous definition
was the only mention of
perimenopause in a two-volume gynaecology text published in 1996. Almost 10 years
later, consensus statements and reviews continue to imply that perimenopause is a time
of dropping estrogen levels (National Institutes of Health, 2005). And menopause
continues to be defined by an inaccurate ‘estrogen deficiency paradigm’ that didn’t
change after the recent randomized controlled trial data showing more harm than
benefit from treatment with estrogen or estrogen/progestin for largely asymptomatic
menopausal women (Beral et al., 2002). Although menopause and its low estrogen and
progesterone levels are a normal part of all women’s life cycle, the estrogen deficiency
paradigm to explain women’s health risks remains as strong as ever. One might even
speculate that perimenopause is constructed as dropping estrogen levels to serve as a
new market for estrogen now that sales for older menopausal women have decreased
(Austin et al., 2003).
But first, we need to discuss language and definitions. Average women call
‘menopause’ any changed experiences (especially hot flushes) in midlife and beyond.
However, officially ‘menopause’ is the literal ‘final menstrual period’ (Soules et al.,
2001; WHO Technical Report Series, 1996). ‘Postmenopause’ begins immediately
following that ‘final’ flow. Perimenopause, or the ‘menopausal transition’ as is now
politically correct, begins when cycles become irregular and pituitary follicle
stimulating (FSH) levels are increased (Soules et al., 2001). The menopausal transition
ends the day before the final menstrual period (McKinlay et al., 1992; Soules et al.,
2001). In both the WHO 1996 and the 2001 STRAW conference recommendations,
perimenopause and ‘postmenopause’ overlap for 1 year beyond the final menstrual
period (Soules et al., 2001; WHO Technical Report Series, 1996). At best, this is
The above definitions don’t fit with women’s experiences or new scientific data.
Instead, menopause is the normal life phase beginning 1 year beyond the final
menstrual period—a 45-year-old woman with 1 year without flow has less than a 10%
chance of further flow (Wallace et al., 1979). Perimenopause begins when women
notice experience changes—these indicate the evolving hormonal patterns of ovarian
ageing. Thus perimenopause begins in midlife women with regular menstrual cycles
(Hale et al., 2003; Prior, 2002b, 2005a, 2005b). Women typically notice cycles that are
closer together, sore breasts, mid-sleep wakening, heavier flow and cyclic night sweats
(Prior, 2005a). Menopause begins a year beyond the final menstrual flow.
Why this concept of ‘estrogen deficiency’? It originated early in the 20th century
following the first chemical isolation of estrogen. This new hormone immediately
became a gynaecological therapy to treat women (’s inferiority) (Oudshoorn, 1994). The
construction of perimenopause as a time of dropping estrogen levels comes directly
from the view that menopause is characterized by ‘stigmata of hormone deprivation’
(Byyny & Speroff, 1990). That is not to deny that estrogen levels are low in menopause.
Something that is a normal part of the life cycle cannot at the same time cause major
disease and debility. The normal life cycles for estrogen and progesterone levels are
shown in Figure 1. The low estrogen levels of childhood are mirrored by similar levels
in menopause. Both the adolescent and perimenopausal transitions show higher and
324 J.C. PRIOR
more variable estrogen levels. Progesterone is produced in high levels only during the
luteal phase, the last third of the menstrual cycle following release of an egg (ovulation).
The luteal phase has an optimum length of 10–14 days; however, luteal phases are short
in puberty and perimenopause (Prior, 2002b; Vollman, 1977) (Figure 1).
For the last 10 years, we have known that estrogen levels are higher and less
predictable in perimenopause (Prior, 1998; Santoro et al., 1996). Santoro and
colleagues studied pre- and perimenopausal women in parallel across one menstrual
cycle monitoring daily urinary estrogen and progesterone levels—perimenopausal
women showed significantly higher estrogen and lower progesterone excretions
(Santoro et al., 1996). I performed a meta-analysis of the published comparisons,
within four centres, of serum estradiol levels at two times in the cycle in over 200 pre-
and perimenopausal women (Prior, 1998). Estradiol levels, in these (presumably
asymptomatic) perimenopausal women with regular cycles, averaged 30% higher than
in premenopausal women (Prior, 1998).
I feel a profound sense of personal outrage that ‘experts’ can deny the existence of
perimenopause or portray it as dropping estrogen levels when estrogen is really high
and unpredictable. For me, perimenopause was an extremely difficult time, made
worse because I was experiencing the opposite of what I had expected. I experienced
more than 12 years of sore, swollen and nodular breasts. The premenstrual fluid and
mood symptoms I had learned to control with increased exercise when I was
premenopausal no longer relented no matter how far I ran or walked (Prior, 2002a).
And I dreamed I was pregnant! Both my rational and my unconscious mind knew I was
experiencing high estrogen levels. However, the medical literature at the time asserted
Therefore, I was jubilant when I first saw the data from an excellent population-
based study showing higher-than-premenopausal-normal estrogen levels in perimeno-
pause (Figure 2) (Burger et al., 1995). Estrogen levels were measured at baseline in the
Melbourne Midlife Women’s Health Study, which enrolled 438 women aged 45–55
who had menstruated within the past 3 months, were not taking oral contraceptives or
any hormone therapy, and agreed to join a longitudinal study. The data were shown as
a scatter plot of estrogen levels obtained days 3–8 of the menstrual cycle by midlife
Figure 1. A cartoon-like depiction of the estrogen and progesterone changes across women’s life cycles shows the
chaotic and higher estrogen levels in perimenopausal women and lower progesterone levels during both adolescence and
PERIMENOPAUSE LOST 325
women classified into five groups: (I) women with regular flow (‘premenopausal’); (II)
those with changes in flow; (III) those with changes in cycle length; (IV) those with
changes in both cycle length and flow; and (V) those who had been 3 but less than 12
months without a period. I have annotated Figure 2 with a lower line for the average
premenopausal follicular phase (cycle days 3–8) estrogen levels, and a higher line
for the highest midcycle peak estrogen level of the normal premenopausal mens-
trual cycle based on published data from Burger’s own lab (McLachlan et al., 1987).
Almost 50% of estrogen values were higher than normal and at least 10% were higher
than the premenopausal midcycle peak, even in group V who were almost a year
beyond their last period (Burger et al., 1995) and were considered ‘postmenopausal’ by
the WHO and STRAW criteria (Soules et al., 2001; WHO Technical Report Series,
My excitement at seeing scientific validation of my high estrogen perimenopausal
experiences, however, was dashed when I read the conclusion for that paper: ‘We
conclude that … decreases in E
(estrogen) … are the major endocrine changes that
characterize the menopausal transition’ (Burger et al., 1995, p. 3537; author’s
emphasis). Although the geometric mean estrogen level is higher for group I than
group V, these authors had not seen the very high estrogen levels that their data so
beautifully showed. They were perhaps unable to see because the data didn’t fit their
paradigm. We wrote a scathing letter to the editor demanding that the authors ‘let the
data speak!’ (Prior et al., 1996).
These higher perimenopausal estrogen levels are associated with lower progesterone
levels or shorter luteal phase lengths (Prior, 2002b; Santoro et al., 1996) as shown in
Figure 1. It is not yet proven, but likely, that the higher, chaotic estrogen levels and
lower progesterone production cause symptoms in perimenopause. However, a case-
control study of perimenopausal women with heavy flow showed significantly higher
estrogen levels than controls. Endometrial (uterine lining) biopsies in the cases showed
Figure 2. This figure, a scatter plot of estradiol levels during days 3–8 of the menstrual cycle from the Melbourne
Midlife Women’s Health Study, shows the mean premenopausal early follicular phase levels in the same lab with a
lower line and mean midcycle estradiol peak levels as a solid line. Groups of women classified I–V are described in the
text. Adapted from Burger (Burger et al., 1995).
326 J.C. PRIOR
hyperplasia consistent with higher estrogen and lower progesterone levels (Moen et al.,
2004). I have made the case that the hormonal changes of perimenopause are
congruent with the troubling experiences of symptomatic women although proof is
currently lacking (Prior, 1998).
Despite its unique hormonal characteristics, perimenopause, as opposed to
menopause, is barely mentioned in books for lay women (O’Leary Cobb, 2005).
Worse yet, following the culturally accepted paradigm of estrogen deficiency, even
feminists seeking to empower women describe perimenopause as a time when ‘the
ovaries are no longer producing enough estrogen to result in regular cycles …’ (Boston
Women’s Health Book Collective, 2005, p. 531). Finally, official bodies actively
conflated and confused perimenopause with menopause because both may cause hot
flushes and decreased sexual interest (National Institutes of Health, 2005).
Before I’m accused by my feminist colleagues of medicalizing a normal phase of
women’s lives (Ford & Mains, 2003), let me stress that only about 15–20% experience
importantly negative perimenopausal experience changes (Avis et al., 1993). Further,
perimenopausal symptoms relate to culture, ethnicity, as well as economic status (Gold
et al., 2000).
Having now developed some perspective from my vantage as an asymptomatic
menopausal woman, but given the distress I see in hundreds of ‘Ask Jerilynn’ emails to
the Centre for Menstrual Cycle and Ovulation Research (www.cemcor.ubc.ca), I feel
that it is tragic to misunderstand perimenopause as dropping estrogen levels. Knowing
that today 19% of Canadian woman are aged 40–55, I feel that it is urgent to set the
record straight and provide them with accessible scientific and practical information
(Prior, 2005b). Furthermore, it is illogical to treat perimenopausal symptoms with
estrogen therapy when endogenous estrogen levels are high and relatively non-
suppressible (Prior, 1998). Given that perimenopausal progesterone levels are low,
progesterone and progestins are effective therapy for hot flushes (Leonetti et al., 1999;
Schiff et al., 1980) and that oral micronized progesterone improves deep sleep (Friess
et al., 1997), cyclic progesterone therapy should be the first line of therapy for
symptomatic perimenopausal women (Prior, 2005b).
The lack of, or mis-, information we as women receive deprives us of self-knowledge,
alienates us (further) from our own bodies, and leaves us both diseased and dependent.
In the remainder of this analysis I will describe and illustrate six ways in which the
current gynaecological construction of ovarian ageing deprives us of the power of
Perimenopause as a chronic illness
Women lose the potential power of perimenopause, given that perimenopause and
menopause are implied to be the same, because they feel their current, undesirable
experiences (symptoms) will go on forever. This results in women seeking and finding
(disease) diagnoses to explain and legitimize the suffering such as ‘fibromyalgia’,
‘chronic fatigue syndrome’ and ‘PMS’. All may be ways of explaining, in a medically
sanctioned manner, the low energy and mood swings that some women experience
(Kaufert et al., 1987). Consequently, a perimenopausal woman may start viewing
herself as chronically ill. She also commonly ends up missing work with heavy periods
(Cote et al., 2002), and may lose her occupation and/or have to go on long-term
disability. Women currently, from popular literature and their physicians’ advice,
cannot know that perimenopause ends in a kinder and calmer phase of life
PERIMENOPAUSE LOST 327
appropriately called menopause. Thus competent, valuable women become dependent
on society or others, instead of contributing their creativity and energy.
Perimenopausal isolation arises in an information vacuum combined with reticence in
talking with other women. As Sheehy described in 1992, ‘Menopause (sic) may be the
last taboo’ (Sheehy, 1992, p. 4). Lack of accurate, available information isolates women
from each other and often causes women to seek medical help, or pay large sums of
money for preparations that may/may not be helpful. The current increased alternative
and complementary medicine use may be largely because perimenopausal women are
thrilled to find someone (a health food store clerk or self-help speaker) to listen to and
validate their experiences.
Although feminist publications aim to produce solidarity, if these writings con-
fuse menopause and perimenopause, as many do (Boston Women’s Health Book
Collective, 2005; Breen & Hall, 1999; O’Leary Cobb, 2005), they don’t accurately
describe women’s experiences and cannot relieve the sense of isolation. Thus, peri-
menopause becomes a lonely voyage into a frightening future.
Perimenopause as dropping/deficient estrogen levels
From my personal perimenopausal frustrations, I know what it feels like to have your
experiences disbelieved, discounted, or denied. I experienced high estrogen levels in
perimenopause—I knew that because of many more days than usual of stretchy mucus,
breasts that were swollen and tender, not just before flow but for most of the month,
and because of fluid retention and a tendency to feel blue. These experiences occurred
occasionally at my midcycle estrogen peak or premenstrually during my 34
premenopausal years—I had enthusiastically monitored my menstrual cycle experi-
ences and basal temperature for at least 10 years by the time I began perimenopause.
So, when experts said perimenopause was about dropping or deficient estrogen levels, I
secretly scoffed. And then I became angry. I further felt a keen need to scientifically
confirm what I was experiencing.
The most convincing evidence for high estrogen in perimenopause experiences is the
pregnancy dream that women from many backgrounds and cultures report. I had such
a vivid dream early in perimenopause when my cycles were still regular. That pregnancy
dream was also reported by Janine O’Leary Cobb in the 1993 introduction to the first
edition of her book Understanding Menopause (O’Leary Cobb, 2005). Finally, a !Kung
woman from the Kalahari Desert, who was frustrated at regular flow and no pregnancy,
told a woman ethnographer that she had recently dreamed that she was pregnant
(Shostak, 1981). There is nothing about pregnancy that feels like, or means, low
I was so eager to prove that I was experiencing higher estrogen levels that I repeated a
mammogram I had about 6 years earlier because of a benign breast lump (in the
opposite breast). I had it done on the same X-ray machine, using identical focal
distances and exposures so that I could, for teaching purposes, contrast the peri-
menopausal increases in my breast size and density with my premenopausal normal
breast (Figure 3).
My further efforts to document the true hormonal changes of perimenopause
culminated in a systematic review of the medical literature that had published
328 J.C. PRIOR
premenopausal and perimenopausal estrogen levels from women within the same
centre (Prior, 1998). I was able to find eight studies and perform a meta-analysis
in four of estrogen levels in the follicular phase in 292 premenopausal versus 415
perimenopausal women and from the premenstrual portion of the cycle in 250
premenopausal versus 69 perimenopausal women (Figure 4). The data analysed
within-centre by chi square testing showed significantly higher estrogen levels in
perimenopausal women during both the follicular and premenstrual phases (F516.12,
p50.041 and F515.46, p50.016), respectively.
Perimenopausal heavy flow—erroneous concepts and inappropriate therapies
Heavy flow doesn’t fit with the concept of dropping estrogen levels in perimenopause.
Therefore it, like sore breasts, is missing from the early questionnaires developed to
assess ‘menopause’ (Greenblatt et al., 1950; Kupperman et al., 1953) and from con-
temporary studies (Dennerstein et al., 2000). However, even the inaccurate gynaeco-
logical definition of perimenopause quoted earlier mentioned ‘dysfunctional uterine
bleeding’, which means abnormally heavy, unexplained, but regular menstrual flow.
That is because heavy flow is a prominent symptom for perimenopausal women
(Kaufert et al., 1987; McKinlay et al., 1992) and commonly the cause for a physician
The currently recommended therapy for heavy flow in perimenopause is an oral
contraceptive (OC) (Greendale & Greendale, 2002) even though the only randomized,
double blind placebo-controlled (pharmaceutical-funded) study showed a significant
Figure 3. This photograph contrasts mammograms of one breast in a woman when she was premenopausal (on the
left) and when she was regularly menstruating with high estrogen levels in early perimenopause (on the right).
PERIMENOPAUSE LOST 329
worsening of unpredictable bleeding in the first 3 months of perimenopausal OC use
(Casper et al., 1997). Although the flow did improve during cycles four through six of
that study, the medication caused no significant improvements in quality of life using
the SF-36 nor in hot flushes (Casper et al., 1997).
Perimenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding, because they may have co-
existent fibroids, ‘hear’ (understand) that these cause the excess flow. Fibroids,
however, arise from the uterine muscle wall and rarely impinge on the lining that is
bleeding. Also, a case-control study of perimenopausal women with heavy bleeding
clearly showed higher estrogen levels compared with premenopausal controls (Moen
et al., 2004). Furthermore, endometrial biopsies documented hyperplasia, an abnormal
result that develops with low progesterone and higher estrogen levels, as commonly
occurs in perimenopause (Moen et al., 2004). The heavy bleeding in perimenopause
often requires therapy. However, effective non-surgical therapies are available
(Baldaszti et al., 2003; Fraser, 1990; Irvine et al., 1998) including non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen,
that decrease flow by 25–45% (Fraser et al.,
Despite these evidence-based, woman-acceptable and available therapies, dilatation
and curettage, and hysterectomy are the most common treatments for heavy flow
(Coulter et al., 1991). Five women in that clinical practice study who were lost to
follow-up no longer had heavy flow when interviewed 5 years later, indicating that the
natural history of perimenopausal menorrhagia is improvement. Average age at
hysterectomy is 42 to 46, based on data from three population-based studies in three
different countries (Maresh et al., 2002; Tuppurainen et al., 1993; Weel et al., 1999).
Figure 4. This bar graph represents data from a meta-analysis of the literature on estradiol levels, within-centre, in
premenopausal and perimenopausal women (Prior, 1998).
330 J.C. PRIOR
Thus ‘heavy flow’ is at a younger age than when irregular cycles start and
perimenopause is diagnosed, age 47.5 (McKinlay et al., 1992; Soules et al., 2001).
This congruence in mean age at hysterectomy across very different populations points
to a common underlying biological process causing it (the hormonal changes of early
perimenopause) and the need to diagnose perimenopause before irregular cycles begin
in symptomatic midlife women (Prior, 2005a).
One of the rarely mentioned results of hysterectomy for perimenopausal women is
that they lose the potential to use bleeding to organize and understand their
experiences. Perhaps for that reason, women who have had hysterectomy visit their
physicians twice as often as those women who haven’t (Johannes et al., 1994;
Oldenhave et al., 1993). Even if the ovaries were not removed, hysterectomized women
were more likely to report hot flushes (Oldenhave et al., 1993) and to be treated with
(inappropriate) estrogen therapy (Guthrie et al., 2003).
Perimenopause as social and cultural loss
Feminists have tended to construct perimenopause as a time of loss of youth and
therefore women’s sexual allure and status. Feminists, ascribing women’s midlife
symptoms to the ‘empty nest’, are now saying we are symptomatic in perimenopause
because of the role conflicts of being wageworkers and also having care-giving functions
for elderly parents and nearly/adult children.
Feminists have rightly been mistrustful of doctors and scientists who construe
‘menopause’ as a deficiency disease (MacPherson, 1985). Furthermore, women have
traditionally understood science to be the domain of men (Keller, 1983) and as anti-
woman because science, in this culture, views men as the primary creators of facts
(Hubbard, 1990). However, social relationships and cultural critiques are well within
the scope of women’s acknowledged expertise (Rossi, 2004). Therefore feminists have
tended to focus on women as social, rather than also as biological, creatures. They have
questioned the existence of perimenopause at all (Ford & Mains, 2003) and ascribed
the discomforts and symptoms primarily to social stress (Page, 1994). As a
perimenopausal woman I was working closely with the author of the above book. I
was upset that she seemed ‘allergic to the body’. However, Page doesn’t deny the
physical changes of perimenopause but instead focuses on the sociocultural and
emotional sides that are part of what is ‘silent’ about ‘menopause’ in this culture (Page,
1992). She wisely observed that previous personal reproductive issues tended to surface
and need attention in perimenopause (Page, 1994). But to ascribe all of the emotional
turmoil that perimenopause can produce to the social inequities inherent in this
culture, to changed domestic responsibilities or past experiences, is to maintain an
anachronistic, dualistic and inaccurate view that separates body from soul or spirit. I
believe that there is no way to understand health in its totality as physical, emotional,
and social well-being without understanding and integrating the essential, multi-
directional hypothalamic connections among social stress, nutritional, sleep and
exercise changes, and physical and emotional responses (Prior et al., 1999).
Two examples illustrate the complex connections among perimenopausal physical
and emotional changes: the role of high estrogen levels in amplifying the hormonal
responses to social stress; and the complex interactions among estrogen exposure, PMS
and hot flushes. The first is an experiment using the Trier Social Stress Test, a
standardized test of neuroendocrine responses to the social stress of speaking and doing
math in front of an audience. Researchers assessed the effect of estrogen on stress
PERIMENOPAUSE LOST 331
responses by randomizing young men to wear a 100-mg estrogen patch or identical
placebo before and during the test (Kirschbaum et al., 1996). Estrogen-treated men
showed significantly higher levels of the stress hormones, ACTH, cortisol and
norepinephrine compared with the placebo-treated (Kirschbaum et al., 1996). Thus,
the high estrogen levels of perimenopause amplify the stress responses of women to
their existing social/emotional stressors.
The second illustration of social–emotional–hormonal connection relates to
premenstrual symptoms and hot flushes. Premenstrual symptoms, although poorly
understood, are worse when estrogen levels are higher and progesterone levels are
lower, in a within-woman analysis (Wang et al., 1996). Evidence suggests that
premenopausal premenstrual symptoms are decreased by exercise of increasing
intensity (Prior et al., 1987) but become resistant to the physiological feedback of
exercise in perimenopause (Prior, 2002a). Several prospective studies have shown that
midlife women with increased premenstrual symptoms were more likely to have hot
flushes later in perimenopause (Freeman et al., 2004; Guthrie et al., 1996; Morse et al.,
1989). To understand these relationships, one must realize that hot flushes occur
because the hypothalamus has been exposed to higher levels of estrogen (hence
premenstrual symptoms). The brain then reacts when estrogen levels decrease at all,
even from extremely high to high (Gangar et al., 1993). Such swings are common
during perimenopausal hormonal chaos. Therefore, women with premenstrual
symptoms and the highest estrogen levels early in perimenopause were more likely to
experience troublesome night sweats/hot flushes later. It is also clear that stress
increases hot flushes (Gold et al., 2000; Swartzman et al., 1990). Thus, stress
responses, premenstrual symptoms, and hot flushes in perimenopause cannot be
understood without integration of biological and cultural variables. Therefore,
feminists and social scientists do women a disservice to focus only on social and
Perimenopause without self-actualization
It would be a tragedy to live through perimenopause thinking that you had a chronic
disease from which you would never recover, and to never learn that many others had
survived similar symptoms in perimenopause. It would also be ultimately sad to feel
further devalued in perimenopause because your experiences didn’t fit with the
dropping estrogen levels you were told you had, or to have undergone hysterectomy
when the bleeding could have been treated medically. There would also be major loss if
a woman were to blame herself for her inability to cope with the estrogen-related
amplification of life’s midlife stresses. The biggest loss of all would be to avoid the self-
learning intrinsic to perimenopause—that is the final of the six losses related to
There is surprising unanimity among many thoughtful authors that perimenopause
‘requires’ a fundamental life re-evaluation. This concept is best expressed by author
Ursula Le Guin:
There are things the Old Woman can do, say, and think which the Woman cannot
do, say, or think. The Woman has to give up more than her menstrual periods
before she can do, say, or think them. She has to change her life … The woman
who is willing to make that change must become pregnant with herself, at last.
(LeGuin, 1991, p. 4)
332 J.C. PRIOR
In summary, this paper has reframed perimenopause and described six reasons why
perimenopause may be ‘lost’. It is an important loss to have become menopausal
without experiencing the perimenopause ‘graduation’ that implies new and essential
self-knowledge. Each of these six reasons can have tragic consequences for a woman’s
well-being. These reasons include not knowing that perimenopause is self-limited and
we all survive, that it can be a time of solidarity with the millions of women present and
past, and that our symptoms are related to higher rather than dropping estrogen levels.
There will be irreversible loss if perimenopausal heavy bleeding is treated by surgery
when it could be treated with effective, acceptable medications, and its natural history
is improvement. If we don’t learn how our physical and sociocultural responses are
linked in perimenopause, we will likely not learn this later. All of the above may cause
women to survive perimenopause without gaining the self-awareness and confident
assertiveness that are this life phase’s endowment for women.
1. Incongruous because estrogen deficiency and declining ovarian function are diametrically opposite to
cyclic heavy vaginal bleeding (called ‘dysfunctional uterine bleeding’).
2. All non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs appear to decrease menstrual flow. Some drugs in this class are
available without a prescription in Canada and the USA.
AUSTIN, P.C., MAMDANI, M.M., TU,K.&JAAKKIMAINEN, L. (2003). Prescriptions for estrogen replacement
therapy in Ontario before and after publication of the Women’s Health Initiative Study. Journal of the
American Medical Association,289, 3241–3242.
AVIS, N.E., KAUFERT, P.A., LOCK, M., MCKINLAY, S.M. & VASS, K. (1993). The evolution of menopausal
symptoms. Baillieres Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism,7, 17–32.
BALDASZTI, E., WIMMER-PUCHINGER,B.&LOSCHKE, K. (2003). Acceptability of the long-term contraceptive
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena): a 3-year follow-up study. Contraception,67, 87–91.
BERAL, V., BANKS,E.&REEVES, G. (2002). Evidence from randomised trials on the long-term effects of
hormone replacement therapy. Lancet,360, 942–944.
BOSTON WOMEN’S HEALTH BOOK COLLECTIVE. (2005). The new our bodies ourselves. New York: Simon &
BREEN, M.J. & HALL, L. (1999). So many changes. Toronto: Lawrence Heights Community Health Centre
BURGER, H.G. et al. (1995). The endocrinology of the menopausal transition: a cross-sectional study of a
population-based sample. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism,80, 3537–3545.
BYYNY, R.L. & SPEROFF, L. (1990). A clinical guide for the care of older women. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
CASPER, R.F., DODIN, S., REID, R.L. & STUDY INVESTIGATORS. (1997). The effect of 20 ug ethinyl estradiol/
1 mg norethindrone acetate (Minestrin
), a low-dose oral contraceptive, on vaginal bleeding patterns, hot
flashes, and quality of life in symptomatic perimenopausal women. Menopause,4, 139–147.
COTE, I., JACOBS,P.&CUMMING, D. (2002). Work loss associated with increased menstrual loss in the
United States. Obstetrics & Gynecology,100, 683–687.
COULTER, A., BRADLOW, J., AGASS, M., MARTIN-BATES,C.&TULLOCH, A. (1991). Outcomes of referrals to
gynaecology outpatient clinics for menstrual problems: an audit of general practice records. British Journal
of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,98, 789–796.
DENNERSTEIN, L., DUDLEY, E.C., HOPPER, J.L., GUTHRIE, J.R. & BURGER, H.G. (2000). A prospective
population-based study of menopausal symptoms. Obstetrics & Gynecology,96, 351–358.
FORD,A.&MAINS, B. (2003). A peri important debate. Herizons,17, 18–21.
FRASER, I.S. (1990). Treatment of ovulatory and anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding with oral
progestogens. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,30, 353–356.
FRASER, I.S., PEARSE, C., SHEARMAN, R.P., ELLIOTT, P.M., MCILVEEN,J.&MARKHAM, R. (1981). Efficacy
of mefenamic acid in patients with a complaint of menorrhagia. Obstetrics & Gynecology,58, 543–551.
PERIMENOPAUSE LOST 333
FREEMAN, E.W., SAMMEL, M.D., RINAUDO, P.J. & SHENG, L. (2004). Premenstrual syndrome as a predictor
of menopausal symptoms. Obstetrics & Gynecology,103, 960–966.
FRIESS, E., TAGAYA, H., TRACHSEL, L., HOLSBOER,F.&RUPPRECHT, R. (1997). Progesterone-induced
changes in sleep in male subjects. American Journal of Physiology,272, E885–E891.
GANGAR, K.F., CUST, M.P. & WHITEHEAD, M.I. (1993). Symptoms of oestrogen deficiency associated with
supraphysiological plasma estradiol concentrations in women with oestradiol implants. British Medical
GOLD, E.B. (2000). Relation of demographic and lifestyle factors to symptoms in a multi-racial/ethnic
population of women 40–55 years of age. American Journal of Epidemiology,152, 463–473.
GREENBLATT, R.B., BARFIELD, W.E., GARNER, J.F., CALK, G.L. & HARROD, J.P. (1950). Evaluation of an
estrogen, androgen, estrogen–androgen combination, and a placebo in the treatment of the menopause.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology,10, 1547–1558.
GREENDALE,C.&GREENDALE, G. (2002). Menopause. In: R.E. Rabel & E.T. Bope (Eds), Conn’s current
therapy 2002 (pp. 1081–1085). New York: W.B. Saunders.
GUTHRIE, J.R., DENNERSTEIN, L., HOPPER, J.L. & BURGER, H.G. (1996). Hot flushes, menstrual status, and
hormone levels in a population-based sample of midlife women. Obstetrics and Gynecology,88, 437–442.
GUTHRIE, J.R., DENNERSTEIN, L., TAFFE, J.R. & DONNELLY, V. (2003). Health care-seeking for menopausal
problems. Climacteric,6, 112–117.
HALE, G.E., HITCHCOCK, C.L., WILLIAMS, L.A., VIGNA, Y.M. & PRIOR, J.C. (2003). Cyclicity of breast
tenderness and night-time vasomotor symptoms in mid-life women: information collected using the Daily
Perimenopause Diary. Climacteric,6, 128–139.
HUBBARD, R.W. (1990). The politics of women’s biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
IRVINE, G.A., CAMPBELL-BROWN, M.B., LUMSDEN, M.A., HEIKKILA, A., WALKER, J.J. & CAMERON, I.T.
(1998). Randomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and norethisterone for
treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,105, 592–598.
JOHANNES, C.B., CRAWFORD, S.L., POSNER, J.G. & MCKINLAY, S.M. (1994). Longitudinal patterns and
correlates of hormone replacement therapy use in middle-aged women. American Journal of Epidemiology,
KAUFERT, P.A., GILBERT,P.&TATE, R. (1987). Defining menopausal status: the impact of longitudinal data.
KELLER, E.F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: the like and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W.H.
KIRSCHBAUM,C.et al. (1996). Short-term estradiol treatment enhances pituitary–adrenal axis and
sympathetic responses to psyhosocial stress in healthy young men. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and
KUPPERMAN, H.S., BLATT, M.H., WIESBADER,H.&FILLER, W. (1953). Comparative clinical evaluation of
estrogenic preparations by the menopausal and amenorrheal indices. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and
LEGUIN, U.K. (1991). The space crone. In: A.C. Sumrall & D. Taylor (Eds), Women of the 14th moon:
writings on menopause (pp. 3–6). Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.
LEONETTI, H.B., LONGO,S.&ANASTI, J.N. (1999). Transdermal progesterone cream for vasomotor
symptoms and postmenopausal bone loss. Obstetrics and Gynecology,94, 225–228.
MACPHERSON, K.J. (1985). Osteoporosis and menopause: a feminist analysis of the social construction of a
syndrome. Advances Nursing Science,7, 11–22.
MARESH, M.J. et al. (2002). The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their
surgery. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,109, 302–312.
MCKINLAY, S.M., BRAMBILLA, D.J. & POSNER, J.G. (1992). The normal menopause transition. Maturitas,14,
MCLACHLAN, R.I., ROBERTSON, D.M., HEALY, D.L., BURGER, H.G. & DE KRETSER, D.M. (1987).
Circulating immunoreactive inhibin levels during the normal human menstrual cycle. Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology and Metabolism,65, 954–961.
MOEN, M.H., KAHN, H., BJERVE, K.S. & HALVORSEN, T.B. (2004). Menometrorrhagia in the perimenopause
is associated with increased serum estradiol. Maturitas,47, 151–155.
MORSE, C.A., DUDLEY, E., GUTHRIE,J.&DENNERSTEIN, L. (1989). Relationships between premenstrual
complaints and perimenopausal experiences. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology,19,
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH. (2005). State-of-the-Science Conference statement: management of
menopause-related symptoms. Annals of Internal Medicine,142, 1003–1013.
334 J.C. PRIOR
NELSON, L.M., ANASTI, J.N. & FLACK, M.R. (1996). Premature ovarian failure. In: E.Y. Adashi & J.A. Rock
& Z. Rosenwacks (Eds), Reproductive endocrinology, surgery, and technology (pp. 1393–1410). Philadelphia:
O’LEARY COBB, J. (1993). Understanding menopause (1st ed.). Toronto: Key Porter Books.
O’LEARY COBB, J. (2005). Understanding menopause (6th ed.). Toronto: Key Porter Books.
OLDENHAVE, A., JASZMANN, J.B., EVERAERD, W.T. & HASPELS, A.A. (1993). Hysterectomized women with
ovarian conservation report more severe climacteric complaints than do normal climacteric women of
similar age. American Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology,168, 765–771.
OUDSHOORN, N. (1994). Beyond the natural body: an archeology of sex hormones (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
PAGE, L. (1992). The silent menopause. A Friend Indeed: For Women in the Prime of Life,9, 1–4.
PAGE, L. (1994). Menopause and emotions: making sense of your feelings when your feelings make no sense (1 ed.).
Vancouver: Primavera Press.
PRIOR, J.C. (1998). Perimenopause: the complex endocrinology of the menopausal transition. Endocrine
PRIOR, J.C. (2002a). Premenstrual symptoms and signs. In: R.E. Rabel & E.T. Bope (Eds), Conn’s current
therapy 2002 (pp. 1078–1080). New York: W.B. Saunders.
PRIOR, J.C. (2002b). The ageing female reproductive axis II: ovulatory changes with perimenopause. In: D.J.
Chadwick & J.A. Goode (Eds), Endocrine facets of ageing (pp. 172–186). Chichester: John Wiley.
PRIOR, J.C. (2005a). Clearing confusion about perimenopause. British Columbia Medical Journal,47,
PRIOR, J.C. (2005b). Estrogen’s storm season—stories of perimenopause. Vancouver, BC: CeMCOR.
PRIOR, J.C., BARR, S.I. & VIGNA, Y.M. (1996). The controversial endocrinology of the menopausal transition
(letter). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism,81, 3127–3128.
PRIOR, J.C., BISHOP,C.&VIGNA, Y.M. (1999). Looking forward, looking back—the place of women’s
everyday lives in health research. D. Berg (Ed.) Society for Menstrual Cycle Research.
PRIOR, J.C., VIGNA, Y.M., ALOJADO, N., SCIARRETTA,D.&SCHULZER, M. (1987). Conditioning exercise
decreases premenstrual symptoms: a prospective controlled six month trial. Fertility and Sterility,47,
ROSSI, A.S. (2004). The menopausal transition and aging process. In: O.G. Brim & C.D. Ruff & R.C. Kessler
(Eds), How healthy are we? A national study of wellbeing at midlife (pp. 153–201). Chicago: University of
SANTORO, N., ROSENBERG, J., ADEL,T.&SKURNICK, J.H. (1996). Characterization of reproductive hormonal
dynamics in the perimenopause. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism,81, 1495–1501.
SCHIFF, I., TULCHINSKY, D., CRAMER,D.&RYAN, K.J. (1980). Oral medroxyprogesterone in the treatment
of postmenopausal symptoms. Journal of the American Medical Association,244, 1443–1445.
SHEEHY, G. (1992). The silent passage. New York: Random House.
SHOSTAK, M. (1981). Nisa: the life and words of a !Kung woman. New York: Vintage Books.
SOULES, M.R. et al. (2001). Executive summary: stages of reproductive aging workshop (STRAW). Fertility
and Sterility,76, 874–878.
SWARTZMAN, L.C., EDELBERG,R.&KEMMANN, E. (1990). Impact of stress on objectively recorded
menopausal hot flushes and on flush report bias. Health Psychology,9, 529–545.
TUPPURAINEN, M., HONKANEN, R., KROGER, H., SAARIKOSKI,S.&ALHAVA, E. (1993). Osteoporosis risk
factors, gyneacological history and fractures in perimenopausal women—the results of the baseline postal
enquiry of the Kupio osteoporosis risk factor and prevention study. Maturitas,17, 89–100.
VOLLMAN, R.F. (1977). The menstrual cycle. In: E.A. Friedman (Ed.), Major problems in obstetrics and
gynecology. Vol. 7 (1st ed.) (pp. 11–193). Toronto: W.B. Saunders.
WALLACE, R.B., SHERMAN, B.M., BEAN, J.A., TRELOAR, A.E. & SCHLABAUGH, L. (1979). Probability of
menopause with increasing duration of amenorrhea in middle-aged women. American Journal of Obstetrics
& Gynecology,135, 1021–1024.
WANG, M., SEIPPEL, L., PURDY, R.H. & BACKSTROM, T. (1996). Relationship between symptom severity and
steroid variation in women with premenstrual syndrome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism,
WEEL, A.E. et al. (1999). Estrogen receptor polymorphism predicts the onset of natural and surgical
menopause. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism,84, 3146–3150.
WHO TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES. (1996). Research on the menopause in the 1990s. A report of the WHO
Scientific Group (Rep. No. 866). Geneva: World Health Organization.
PERIMENOPAUSE LOST 335