carefully, and coal which produces less ash is favored. Also, not all coal products can be burned in a power plant, and it is necessary to purchase the right coal product to most efficiently use plant resources and minimize costs. Coal is also used by other industries, such as in steel and iron production. Around 64% of steel and iron are produced using coal-based furnaces. Additionally, coal is essential energy source for cement production, as a large amount of energy is needed to produce cements in kilns. Other industries that utilize coal include paper manufacturing, alumina production facilities, and chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Although coal is crucial for the industrialized world, the environmental impacts should be carefully handled. The land where coal is mined becomes temporarily unavailable for other uses such as agriculture, and it makes the land susceptible to soil erosion in addition to creating noise, water pollution, and dust. Moreover, coal mines are a source of methane gas which is harmful to the environment, and the gas is released during mining. Also, coal has environmental impacts when it is burned, which is its major challenge. The oxides of sulfur (SO 2) and nitrogen (NO x), CO 2 , particulate, and trace elements such as mercury can have serious impacts on nature. It has been found that the release of greenhouse gas emissions derived from human activities is related to global warming, and increasing amounts of sulfur and nitrogen oxides lead to acid rain. For these reasons, coal-fired power plants are known to be a major source of air pollution (EIA, 2009). Current CO 2 capture and storage technologies (CCS) and green house gas emission capture technologies are not enough to control all of the outputs. According to the Kyoto protocol, which has been signed by 187 countries, each country is obligated to reduce their emissions to below 1990 levels. Additionally, community pressure against pollution is another major concern for power producers. The cap and trade program developed in the USA and the EU Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) are two important examples of government regulations on power markets to limit emission outputs. If a coal resource is not carefully chosen, the cost of power generation can be higher for power producers and the environmental hazards will also be higher. Suppliers provide coal contracts for each coal type that are sold via a merchandise exchange to power companies. A coal contract includes the amount, type, price, heat content, ash content, sulfur content, and chemical structure of the coal that will be delivered to the power company. The price for each contract is different and often times the mine mouth-price does not include transportation costs. Suppliers issue different coal contracts each of which has its own price and related product descriptions. Power companies must contend with the problem of choosing the best coal contracts that will meet the demand in a cost-effective way, given that there may be multiple power plants at different locations. Abstract: Power companies require sophisticated tools to manage fuel-coal supply chains which include multiple suppliers, coal contracts, and multimode transportation routes. In this article, a multi-objective model which is integrated with multi-attribute decision-making for the selection of suppliers, transportation routes, and coal orders is developed. The model simultaneously optimizes multiple objectives such as minimizing purchase costs, transportation costs, and ash output, and it also presents a decision framework on the selection of suppliers, transportation routes, and coal products that will achieve these objectives. The network and capacity constraints of suppliers and transportation routes are included in the model. The study utilizes multi-objective linear programming and well-known decision rules such as minimax, maximin, and compromise programming, and Analytic Hierarchy Process is employed to determine preferred solutions. The methodology for the solution is illustrated via a case study and an alternative evaluation process is presented. The study demonstrates that the model can be used by power companies to find desired solutions, as it provides an opportunity for the inclusion of the preferences of decision-makers and adjustments of the weights for each objective.