Maghribis in the Mashriq during the modern period: Representations of the other within the world of Islam

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.


Representations of the 'Other' are invariably associated with European or Western perceptions of Islam, Muslims and the Orient. However, as this article argues, the world of Islam was never monolithic and Muslims held widely differing views of each other. Even among 'fellow' North Africans, such as Egyptians and Maghribis, collective regional or local identities developed and furnished the material for self-identification built upon perceived differences among the 'others'. In discussing the religio-cultural bases for these differences, the author examines Malikism, Maghribi Islam as practised in the Mashriq, including Sufism, as well as varying ideas regarding urbanity and cosmopolitanism. He concludes with an analysis of how the Moroccan state and its representatives often sought legitimacy in the Mashriq despite the fact that the Sharifian Empire was a rival of the Ottomans and that Moroccan ulema often saw the Mashriqis as lax in the practice of their religion.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... 9 In a different setting, a Tunisian woman who had moved to Lebanon for educational purposes confided to me that her Lebanese professors told her to translate her Tunisian to Lebanese or French in order to be understood. 10 There are historical reasons for this cultural vector, tied to centrifugal material and ideological movements directed toward an Arab and Islamic heartland(Burke 1972, El Mansour 2001 as well as colonial pasts and intellectual ideologies. Though he wrote the following in light of blindspots in the history discipline, Burke's critique of intellectual flows resonates with reasons for the directed cultural gaze:Although two-thirds of all Arabs live in northern Africa (Egypt and the Arab Maghrib are each one third), Maghribis have long been regarded by U.S. Arabists as "not quite real Arabs," spoiled by colonization and the mission civilisatrice. ...
In 1779 the sultan of Morocco, Muḥammad bin ‘Abdallah (Muḥammad III, r. 1757-90), sent an ambassadorial delegation to Spain to ransom Ottoman-Algerian prisoners. The delegation was led by Muḥammad bin ‘Uthman al-Miknāsī (d. 1799), who left a detailed account of the mission in his extant text Al-Iksīr fī fikāk al-asīr (The Elixir That Will Liberate the Prisoner). When juxtaposed on the historical record, al-Miknāsī’s travelogue illustrates how Muḥammad III and the Moroccan religio-political elite navigated the complex Mediterranean web of religious identity, political allegiance, and ethnicity. Positing a division between “temporal” and “spiritual” sovereignty increases our understanding of how Muḥammad III substantiated his authority on multiple levels in relation to Spain, Ottoman-Algeria, and the Sublime Porte in Istanbul. While previous scholarship has focused on a religio-political aggression against the Christian Europeans, this article employs al-Miknāsī’s travelogue to demonstrate how Muḥammad III halted religio-political aggression against Dār al-Ḥarb (Abode of War) and questioned the unity within Dār al-Islām (Abode of Islam).
In 1910, as the possibility that Morocco would fall to French control threatened to overwhelm the Muslim community, al-Mahdī al-Wazzānī, a distinguished Moroccan Islamic scholar, penned the conclusion of his massive compilation of Mālikī fatwās and named it the New Mi‘yār. This essay explores the nature and meaning of the New Mi‘yār. I argue that al-Wazzānī did not merely assemble a collection of fatwās, but deliberately formulated a text that was firmly rooted in the specific challenges and changes generated by Moroccan modernity and was designed to redefine Mālikī legal tradition to make it relevant to his time. For al-Wazzānī, redefining Mālikī tradition and thought as an effective regulator of contemporary social relations and Islamic morality was necessary to reinforce the authority of Mālikī scholarship and to ensure the moral survival of the Muslim community in the context of the dramatic transformations that characterized Moroccan modernity.
Long shunned by Western countries for its support of terrorist activities, Libya has, over recent years, become an increasingly important partner of European countries in a number of key policy fields. This article examines the rapprochement between Europe and Libya in three areas that have been of particular interest to European Union (EU) countries: immigration control, military cooperation, and collaboration in the energy field. In all of these important policy domains, there has been a significant rise in cooperation between European countries and Libya over recent years. While there has been some debate and criticism within the EU regarding the acceptability of collaborating with the former outlaw state, given its poor human rights record, such criticism has been largely confined to the military (and nuclear) field, whereas the deepening collaboration with Libya in the area of immigration control seems largely acceptable to EU countries. As Libya is playing an increasingly crucial role in several areas that are amongst the EU's main security (and commercial) interests in the Mediterranean region, there has generally been little, if any, willingness on the part of European countries to raise human rights issues in their relationships with Libya.
Full-text available
This article raises the question of whether Shias in the western part of the Arab world have also established political movements. For this, Morocco provides an interesting case as the country has inherited Shiite customs in the religious and cultural domain from the Idrisid dynasty and the monarchy still derives its legitimacy from a succession principle introduced by the Idrisids. However, the international community and probably most Moroccans seem to be unaware of this legacy as well as the existence of a marginalised Shiite community in dissimulation (Taqiyya). A theoretical approach, which is based on the current mainstream of international relations literature, is used to analyse the history of Shias in Morocco, forms of political, economic, and cultural discrimination as well as current Shiite elite politics in order to explain why no genuine political movement has emerged, so far, and to determine the likelihood of the formation of a Shiite political movement and resulting internal conflict. The article should thus be considered a theory-guided first step to open the doors for further enquiries into the subject.
Authority in Morocco has often been based on lineage. Thus genealogy has been a crucial part of dynasty and regime legitimation, as David Hart has shown. However, discourse based on genealogy is neither history nor an accurate description of sociopolitical order as the genealogical memory rarely extends beyond six generations. As a result, alongside this ‘great tradition’ of genealogical authority is a parallel little tradition based on power, as demonstrated by the role of ’arsh and sanctuary as well as by the maraboutic tradition of resistance to foreign occupation in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. For David Hart this linkage between ideology and practical politics was the key to his interests in Morocco and the wider Muslim world.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.