Cortical Activations in Humans Grasp-Related Areas Depend on Hand Used and Handedness

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 02/2008; 3(10):e3388. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003388
Source: PubMed


In non-human primates grasp-related sensorimotor transformations are accomplished in a circuit involving the anterior intraparietal sulcus (area AIP) and both the ventral and the dorsal sectors of the premotor cortex (vPMC and dPMC, respectively). Although a human homologue of such a circuit has been identified whether activity within this circuit varies depending on handedness has yet to be investigated.
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explicitly test how handedness modulates activity within human grasping-related brain areas. Right- and left-handers subjects were requested to reach towards and grasp an object with either the right or the left hand using a precision grip while scanned. A kinematic study was conducted with similar procedures as a behavioral counterpart for the fMRI experiment. Results from a factorial design revealed significant activity within the right dPMC, the right cerebellum and AIP bilaterally. The pattern of activity within these areas mirrored the results found for the behavioral study.
Data are discussed in terms of an handedness-independent role for the right dPMC in monitoring hand shaping, the need for bilateral AIP activity for the performance of precision grip movements which varies depending on handedness and the involvement of the cerebellum in terms of its connections with AIP. These results provide the first compelling evidence of specific grasping related neural activity depending on handedness.

Download full-text


Available from: Wolfgang Grodd
  • Source
    • "In humans, both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have demonstrated the existence of localized cortical reach-to-grasp areas similar to those described in monkeys (Cavina-Pratesi et al. 2007; Culham et al. 2006; Kroliczak et al. 2007; Tunik et al. 2007; for reviews see Castiello 2005; Castiello and Begliomini 2008; Filimon 2010). Overall, reach-to-grasp fMRI studies converge in considering the anterior part of the human intraparietal sulcus (hAIP), a likely homolog of monkey AIP (Grafton et al. 1996; Culham et al. 2003; Frey et al. 2005; Begliomini et al. 2007a; Hinkley et al. 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The quest for a putative human homolog of the reaching–grasping network identified in monkeys has been the focus of many neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies in recent years. These studies have shown that the network underlying reaching-only and reach-to-grasp movements includes the superior parieto-occipital cortex (SPOC), the anterior part of the human intraparietal sulcus (hAIP), the ventral and the dorsal portion of the premotor cortex, and the primary motor cortex (M1). Recent evidence for a wider frontoparietal network coding for different aspects of reaching-only and reach-to-grasp actions calls for a more fine-grained assessment of the reaching–grasping network in humans by exploiting pattern decoding methods (multivoxel pattern analysis—MVPA). Methods: Here, we used MPVA on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to assess whether regions of the frontoparietal network discriminate between reaching-only and reach-to-grasp actions, natural and constrained grasping, different grasp types, and object sizes. Participants were required to perform either reaching-only movements or two reach-to-grasp types (precision or whole hand grasp) upon spherical objects of different sizes. Results: Multivoxel pattern analysis highlighted that, independently from the object size, all the selected regions of both hemispheres contribute in coding for grasp type, with the exception of SPOC and the right hAIP. Consistent with recent neurophysiological findings on monkeys, there was no evidence for a clear-cut distinction between a dorsomedial and a dorsolateral pathway that would be specialized for reaching-only and reach-to-grasp actions, respectively. Nevertheless, the comparison of decoding accuracy across brain areas highlighted their different contributions to reaching-only and grasping actions. Conclusions: Altogether, our findings enrich the current knowledge regarding the functional role of key brain areas involved in the cortical control of reaching-only and reach-to-grasp actions in humans, by revealing novel fine-grained distinctions among action types within a wide frontoparietal network.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015 · Brain and Behavior
  • Source
    • "The structural configuration of the human hand allows the opposing action of the thumb surface to the corresponding surfaces of the other four fingertips. Controlled by a highly evolved nervous system, the human is one among the few species on Earth known to be capable of executing a firm grasp (Begliomini et al., 2008; Cutkosky and Howe, 1990; Markze, 1971). Because of this, the hand has become an indespensable part of the human body for controlling and effecting changes on the environment, either with or without the aid of tools. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We collected the hand anthropometric data of 91 respondents to come up with a Filipino-based measurement to determine the suitability of an input device for a digital equipment, the standard PC keyboard. For correlation purposes, we also collected other relevant information like age, height, province of origin, and gender, among others. We computed the percentiles for each finger to classify various finger dimensions and identify length-specific anthropometric cut-points. We compared the percentiles of each finger dimension against the actual length of the longest key combinations when correct finger placement is used for typing, to determine whether the standard PC keyboard is fit for use by our sampled population. Our analysis shows that the members of the population with hand dimensions at extended position below 75th percentile and at 99th percentile are the ones who would most likely not reach the longest key combination for the left and the right hands, respectively. Using machine vision and image processing techniques, we automated the anthropometric process and compared the accuracy of its measurements to that of manual process'. We compared the measurement generated by our automated anthropometric process with the measurements using the manual one and we found out that they have a very minimal absolute difference. The data collected from this study could be used in other studies such as determining a good design for mobile and other handheld devices, or input devices other than keyboard. The automated method that we developed could be used to easily measure hand dimensions given a digital image of the hand and could be extended for measuring the entire human body for various other applications.
    Preview · Article · Jul 2015
  • Source
    • "in information processing that effect on behavioural performance [3] [6] [23] [55] and that especially become prominent as a function of task complexity [50]. Building on previous research work, the aim of the present electroencephalogram (EEG) study is to evaluate the neural correlates of unimanual and bimanual sequencing in leftvs . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sequencing of finger positions reflects a prototype of skilled behaviour. In order to perform sequencing, cognitive control supports the requirements and postural transitions. In this electroencephalography (EEG) study, we evaluate the effects of hand dominance and assess the neural correlates of unimanual and bimanual sequencing in left- and right-handers. The behavioural measurements provided an index of response planning (response time to first key press) and response execution (time between successive key presses, taps/s and percentage of correct responses), whereas the neural dynamics was determined by means of EEG coherence, expressing the functional connectivity between brain areas. Correlations between brain activity and behaviour were calculated for exploring the neural correlates that are functionally relevant for sequencing. Brain-behavioural correlations during response planning and execution revealed the significance of circuitry in the left hemisphere, underlining its significant role in the organisation of goal-directed behaviour. This lateralisation profile was independent of intrinsic constraints (hand dominance) and extrinsic demands (task requirements), suggesting essential higher-order computations in the left hemisphere. Overall, the observations highlight that the left hemisphere is specialised for sequential motor organisation in left- and right-handers, suggesting an endogenous hemispheric asymmetry for compound actions and the representation of skill; processes that can be separated from those that are involved in hand dominance. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015 · Behavioural Brain Research
Show more