Cortical Activations in Humans Grasp-Related Areas Depend on Hand Used and Handedness

Article (PDF Available)inPLoS ONE 3(10):e3388 · February 2008with49 Reads
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003388 · Source: PubMed
In non-human primates grasp-related sensorimotor transformations are accomplished in a circuit involving the anterior intraparietal sulcus (area AIP) and both the ventral and the dorsal sectors of the premotor cortex (vPMC and dPMC, respectively). Although a human homologue of such a circuit has been identified whether activity within this circuit varies depending on handedness has yet to be investigated. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explicitly test how handedness modulates activity within human grasping-related brain areas. Right- and left-handers subjects were requested to reach towards and grasp an object with either the right or the left hand using a precision grip while scanned. A kinematic study was conducted with similar procedures as a behavioral counterpart for the fMRI experiment. Results from a factorial design revealed significant activity within the right dPMC, the right cerebellum and AIP bilaterally. The pattern of activity within these areas mirrored the results found for the behavioral study. Data are discussed in terms of an handedness-independent role for the right dPMC in monitoring hand shaping, the need for bilateral AIP activity for the performance of precision grip movements which varies depending on handedness and the involvement of the cerebellum in terms of its connections with AIP. These results provide the first compelling evidence of specific grasping related neural activity depending on handedness.

Full-text (PDF)

Available from: PubMed Central · License: CC BY
    • "This is also in line with the evidence that the cortical regions connected by this tract, that is, the right middle frontal gyrus and the right intraparietal regions are active during precision grasping (Begliomini et al. 2014). Furthermore, our findings support the role of the right hemisphere in grasp-preshaping (Tretriluxana et al. 2008; Begliomini et al. 2008), control of finger configurations (Goldenberg et al. 2001; Hermsdörfer et al. 2001; Della Sala et al. 2006), and final limb positions (Haaland et al. 2004; Schaefer et al. 2007 Schaefer et al. , 2009 Mani et al. 2013; Mutha et al. 2013 ). Hence, besides the temporal aspects, the right SLF II might be important for the final arm position and the fingers closing phase around the target object. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Research in both humans and monkeys has shown that even simple hand movements require cortical control beyond primary sensorimotor areas. An extensive functional neuroimaging literature demonstrates the key role that cortical fronto-parietal regions play for movements such as reaching and reach-to-grasp. However, no study so far has examined the specific white matter connections linking the fronto-parietal regions, namely the 3 parallel pathways of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). The aim of the current study was to explore how selective fronto-parietal connections are for different kinds of hand movement in 30 right-handed subjects by correlating diffusion imaging tractography and kinematic data. We showed that a common network, consisting of bilateral SLF II and SLF III, was involved in both reaching and reach-to-grasp movements. Larger SLF II and SLF III in the right hemisphere were associated with faster speed of visuomotor processing, while the left SLF II and SLF III played a role in the initial movement trajectory control. Furthermore, the right SLF II was involved in the closing grip phase necessary for efficient grasping of the object. We demonstrated for the first time that individual differences in asymmetry and structure of the fronto-parietal networks were associated with visuomotor processing in humans.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2016
    • "Therefore, it might well be that the discrimination ability shown here by left BA 6 indicates a differential hand shape monitoring depending on grasp types. Grasp type classification was also possible within the right BA 6: as demonstrated by previous findings, this result could be explained in terms of learning new motor sequences or by high requirements in terms of precision and coordination, independently from the hand used (Davare et al. 2006; Begliomini et al. 2008). In this regard, PG requires high precision in positioning the two fingers on the opposite sides of the object, whereas WHG requires coordination among phalanxes of all fingers. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Introduction: The quest for a putative human homolog of the reaching–grasping network identified in monkeys has been the focus of many neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies in recent years. These studies have shown that the network underlying reaching-only and reach-to-grasp movements includes the superior parieto-occipital cortex (SPOC), the anterior part of the human intraparietal sulcus (hAIP), the ventral and the dorsal portion of the premotor cortex, and the primary motor cortex (M1). Recent evidence for a wider frontoparietal network coding for different aspects of reaching-only and reach-to-grasp actions calls for a more fine-grained assessment of the reaching–grasping network in humans by exploiting pattern decoding methods (multivoxel pattern analysis—MVPA). Methods: Here, we used MPVA on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to assess whether regions of the frontoparietal network discriminate between reaching-only and reach-to-grasp actions, natural and constrained grasping, different grasp types, and object sizes. Participants were required to perform either reaching-only movements or two reach-to-grasp types (precision or whole hand grasp) upon spherical objects of different sizes. Results: Multivoxel pattern analysis highlighted that, independently from the object size, all the selected regions of both hemispheres contribute in coding for grasp type, with the exception of SPOC and the right hAIP. Consistent with recent neurophysiological findings on monkeys, there was no evidence for a clear-cut distinction between a dorsomedial and a dorsolateral pathway that would be specialized for reaching-only and reach-to-grasp actions, respectively. Nevertheless, the comparison of decoding accuracy across brain areas highlighted their different contributions to reaching-only and grasping actions. Conclusions: Altogether, our findings enrich the current knowledge regarding the functional role of key brain areas involved in the cortical control of reaching-only and reach-to-grasp actions in humans, by revealing novel fine-grained distinctions among action types within a wide frontoparietal network.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2015
    • "This is in line with the engagement (seen in our data) of the posterior parietal cortices, namely, the right SPL and the IPL, which have been shown to play a role in the integration of visual information—thus allowing online motor control through modulation of prefrontal motor areas [Hamzei et al., 2002; Marconi et al., 2001; Neely et al., 2013]. The predominance of right hemisphere regions is also supported by evidence that the right hemisphere is specifically involved in grasping networks [Begliomini et al., 2008] and by studies showing that performing sequential movements with the NDH produces greater activations in the CL hemisphere (hence here the right hemisphere) as compared to the DH [J€ ancke et al., 1998; Ng et al., 2008; Seong-Gi et al., 1993]. It has been argued that the recruitment of the motor cortex of righthanders increases when using their NDH and that the more skilled and more widely used cortex requires less effort and, hence, less recruitment and signal [Amunts et al., 1996; J€ ancke et al., 1998; Ng et al., 2008] . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Motor fMRI studies, comparing dominant (DH) and nondominant (NDH) hand activations have reported mixed findings, especially for the extent of ipsilateral (IL) activations and their relationship with task complexity. To date, no study has directly compared DH and NDH activations using an event-related visually guided dynamic power-grip paradigm with parametric (three) forces (GF) in healthy right-handed subjects. We implemented a hierarchical statistical approach aimed to: (i) identify the main effect networks engaged when using either hand; (ii) characterise DH/NDH responses at different GFs; (iii) assess contralateral (CL)/IL-specific and hemisphere-specific activations. Beyond confirming previously reported results, this study demonstrated that increasing GF has an effect on motor response that is contextualised also by the use of DH or NDH. Linear analysis revealed increased activations in sensorimotor areas, with additional increased recruitments of subcortical and cerebellar areas when using the NDH. When looking at CL/IL-specific activations, CL sensorimotor areas and IL cerebellum were activated with both hands. When performing the task with the NDH, several areas were also recruited including the CL cerebellum. Finally, there were hand-side-independent activations of nonmotor-specific areas in the right and left hemispheres, with the right hemisphere being involved more extensively in sensori-motor integration through associative areas while the left hemisphere showing greater activation at higher GF. This study shows that the functional networks subtending DH/NDH power-grip visuomotor functions are qualitatively and quantitatively distinct and this should be taken into consideration when performing fMRI studies, particularly when planning interventions in patients with specific impairments. Hum Brain Mapp, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2015
Show more