ArticleLiterature Review

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

February 2008
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3(4):CD003007

February 2008
3(4):CD003007

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub2

Source
PubMed

Authors:

Raymond W Ostelo

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa

Universidade Cidade de São Paulo

Chris G Maher

The University of Sydney

Henrica De Vet

Amsterdam University Medical Center

Show all 5 authorsHide

Background: Several rehabilitation programmes are available for individuals after lumbar disc surgery. Objectives: To determine whether active rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery is more effective than no treatment, and to describe which type of active rehabilitation is most effective. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2002.First, we clustered treatments according to the start of treatment.1. Active rehabilitation that starts immediately postsurgery.2. Active rehabilitation that starts four to six weeks postsurgery.3. Active rehabilitation that starts longer than 12 months postsurgery.For every cluster, the following comparisons were investigated.A. Active rehabilitation versus no treatment, placebo or waiting list control.B. Active rehabilitation versus other kinds of active rehabilitation.C. Specific intervention in addition to active rehabilitation versus active rehabilitation alone. Search methods: We searched CENTRAL (2013, Issue 4) and MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and PsycINFO to May 2013. Selection criteria: We included only randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data collection and analysis: Pairs of review authors independently assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed if studies were clinically homogeneous. The GRADE approach was used to determine the overall quality of evidence. Main results: In this update, we identified eight new studies, thereby including a total of 22 trials (2503 participants), 10 of which had a low risk of bias. Most rehabilitation programmes were assessed in only one study. Both men and women were included, and overall mean age was 41.4 years. All participants had received standard discectomy, microdiscectomy and in one study standard laminectomy and (micro)discectomy. Mean duration of the rehabilitation intervention was 12 weeks; eight studies assessed six to eight-week exercise programmes, and eight studies assessed 12 to 13-week exercise programmes. Programmes were provided in primary and secondary care facilities and were started immediately after surgery (n = 4) or four to six weeks (n = 16) or one year after surgery (n = 2). In general, the overall quality of the evidence is low to very low. Rehabilitation programmes that started immediately after surgery were not more effective than their control interventions, which included exercise. Low- to very low-quality evidence suggests that there were no differences between specific rehabilitation programmes (multidisciplinary care, behavioural graded activity, strength and stretching) that started four to six weeks postsurgery and their comparators, which included some form of exercise. Low-quality evidence shows that physiotherapy from four to six weeks postsurgery onward led to better function than no treatment or education only, and that multidisciplinary rehabilitation co-ordinated by medical advisors led to faster return to work than usual care. Statistical pooling was performed only for three comparisons in which the rehabilitation programmes started four to six weeks postsurgery: exercise programmes versus no treatment, high- versus low-intensity exercise programmes and supervised versus home exercise programmes. Very low-quality evidence (five RCTs, N = 272) shows that exercises are more effective than no treatment for pain at short-term follow-up (standard mean difference (SMD) -0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.55 to -0.24), and low-quality evidence (four RCTs, N = 252) suggests that exercises are more effective for functional status on short-term follow-up (SMD -0.67; 95% CI -1.22 to -0.12) and that no difference in functional status was noted on long-term follow-up (three RCTs, N = 226; SMD -0.22; 95% CI -0.49 to 0.04). None of these studies reported that exercise increased the reoperation rate. Very low-quality evidence (two RCTs, N = 103) shows that high-intensity exercise programmes are more effective than low-intensity exercise programmes for pain in the short term (weighted mean difference (WMD) -10.67; 95% CI -17.04 to -4.30), and low-quality evidence (two RCTs, N = 103) shows that they are more effective for functional status in the short term (SMD -0.77; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.36). Very low-quality evidence (four RCTs, N = 154) suggests no significant differences between supervised and home exercise programmes for short-term pain relief (SMD -0.76; 95% CI -2.04 to 0.53) or functional status (four RCTs, N = 154; SMD -0.36; 95% CI -0.88 to 0.15). Authors' conclusions: Considerable variation was noted in the content, duration and intensity of the rehabilitation programmes included in this review, and for none of them was high- or moderate-quality evidence identified. Exercise programmes starting four to six weeks postsurgery seem to lead to a faster decrease in pain and disability than no treatment, with small to medium effect sizes, and high-intensity exercise programmes seem to lead to a slightly faster decrease in pain and disability than is seen with low-intensity programmes, but the overall quality of the evidence is only low to very low. No significant differences were noted between supervised and home exercise programmes for pain relief, disability or global perceived effect. None of the trials reported an increase in reoperation rate after first-time lumbar surgery. High-quality randomised controlled trials are strongly needed.

Effectiveness of postsurgical rehabilitation following lumbar disc herniation surgery: A systematic review

Article

Apr 2024

Rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Article

Full-text available

Oct 2023

Background The role of rehabilitation after surgery in patients with low back pain is well recognized. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and update the existing evidence according to the type of clinical condition and rehabilitation approach. Methods This systematic review included RCTs on the effectiveness of rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, CENTRAL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science databases, up to April 15, 2023. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess each study. We conducted a quantitative synthesis when population, intervention, control, and outcome were sufficiently homogeneous; otherwise, we conducted a qualitative analysis. Results Forty-five studies (3.036 subjects) were included and analyzed according to the population considered: lumbar stenosis (1 trial), spondylolisthesis (3 trials), and disc herniation (41 trials). Regarding lumbar stenosis, a supervised active exercise program appears to improve outcomes related to pain, disability, and quality of life both in the short- and mid-term (1 study, n = 60). Concerning spondylolisthesis, kinesiophobia is reduced in the home exercises group compared to usual care, at 3-months follow-up (3 studies, n = 98). For disk herniation, supervised exercises are better than non-supervised exercises to reduce pain (MD -1.14; 95% CIs -1.65, -0.62; 5 trials, n = 250) and disability (SMD -0.70; 95% CIs -1.14, -0.26; 4 trials, n = 175). Supervised exercises are better than advice in reducing pain (SMD -0.91; 95% CIs -1.61, -0.21; 5 trials, n = 341) and disability (SMD -0.80; 95% CIs -1.59, -0.01; 4 trials, n = 261), in the short-term. Supervised exercises are equal to no treatment in reducing pain and disability, at 3 and 6 months after intervention (2 trials, n = 166). These results are supported by a very low to low quality of evidence. Conclusions Our research suggests that supervised exercise may be effective in improving patient’s pain and disability after lumbar surgery, but RCTs regarding lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spondylolisthesis are still scarce, with significant heterogeneity of proposed interventions.

Does physical therapy impact clinical outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery?

Article

Full-text available

Sep 2023
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine

Objectives The objectives of our study were to (1) determine if physical therapy (PT) impacts patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after lumbar decompression surgery and (2) determine if PT impacts postsurgical readmissions or reoperations after lumbar decompression surgery. Methods Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary one- or two-level lumbar decompression at our institution were identified. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes (all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90 days surgical readmissions), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between the groups. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to determine the individual predictors of 90 days readmissions and PROMs at the 1-year postoperative point. Alpha was set at P < 0.05. Results Of the 1003 patients included, 421 attended PT postoperatively. On univariate analysis, PT attendance did not significantly impact 90-day surgical reoperations (P = 0.225). Although bivariate analysis suggests that attendance of PT is associated with worse improvement in physical function (P = 0.041), increased preoperative Visual Analogue Scale leg pain (0 = 0.004), and disability (P = 0.006), as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index, our multivariate analysis, which accounts for confounding variables found there was no difference in PROM improvement and PT was not an independent predictor of 90-day all-cause readmissions (P = 0.06). Instead, Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.025) and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (P = 0.013) independently predicted greater 90-day all-cause readmissions. Conclusions Postoperative lumbar decompression PT attendance does not significantly affect clinical improvement, as measured by PROMs or surgical outcomes including all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90-day surgical readmissions.

Physical therapy utilization, costs, and return-to-work status following lumbar spine surgery: A retrospective analysis of workers compensation claims in Australia

Article

Mar 2022
REV BRAS FISIOTER

Background No study to our knowledge has explored physical therapy utilization following lumbar spine surgery in a workers’ compensation setting. Objectives Describe physical therapy utilization and costs, and return-to-work status in patients following lumbar spine surgery under a workers’ compensation claim. Methods Using data from the New South Wales (NSW) State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Australia), we audited physical therapy billing codes for patients who received lumbar spine surgery from 2010 to 2017. We summarised, by fusion versus decompression, the number of physical therapy sessions patients received up to 12 months post-operatively, total cost of physical therapy and time to initiation of physical therapy. Number of physical therapy sessions and physical therapy utilization at 12 months were summarised by return-to-work status at 12 months. Results We included 3524 patients (1220 had fusion; 2304 decompression). On average, patients received 22 ± 22 physical therapy sessions to 12 months post-operatively (mean cost=AU$1902, US$1217); 24% were receiving physical therapy at 12 months. Most had 9–24 (31%) or 25–50 sessions (25%); 11% had > 50 sessions, whereas 11% had no physical therapy. Patients who had fusion (compared to decompression) had more physical therapy and incurred higher physical therapy costs. Time post-surgery to initiate physical therapy increased from 2010 to 2017. Patients with > 50 sessions and still having physical therapy by 12 months were least likely to be working. Conclusions For most patients, physical therapy utilization following lumbar spine surgery aligns with the best available evidence. However, some patients may be receiving too much physical therapy or initiating physical therapy too early.

Effect of information and exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Article

Full-text available

Jun 2020

Objective The aim of this study was to compare two physiotherapy interventions following lumber disc surgery regarding effect on pain, functioning and fear of movement. Methods This study is a prospective randomized controlled study. When admitted to hospital for first time lumbar disc surgery, the participants were randomized to one of two post‐operative intervention groups: one group received information only and the other exercise in combination with information. Outcomes were collected at baseline, 6–8 weeks and 12‐months post‐surgery. The primary outcome was to record changes in back/hip pain and leg pain. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of changes in function, fear‐avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia. Results Seventy patients completed the study and were included in the analysis, of which 37 were randomized to the group receiving information only and the remaining 33 receiving both exercise and information. For primary outcomes, at 12 months postoperatively, the group receiving both exercise and information had significantly lower leg pain compared with those receiving only information (p < .033). For secondary outcomes, at 12 months postoperatively, a significant difference (p < .027) was detected for function, which favoured those that received both exercise and information. There was no significant difference in the results for the other secondary outcomes. Both groups showed clinically important changes in relation to pain and function from baseline to 12 months. The effect of treatment showed a statistically significant difference in favour of exercise and information, but the difference was not clinically relevant. Conclusion Exercise in combination with information reduced leg pain and improved function, which was statistically more evident over a period of time. Postoperative physiotherapy after lumbar disc surgery could include exercises in addition to information, but perhaps not for all patients, as both groups improved, and the difference between the two groups was not clinically relevant.

Early postoperative stabilometric training in patients with spinal diseases who underwent decompressive-stabilizing interventions

Article

Jan 2019

Aim: To study the impact of rehabilitation measures on the dynamics of pain syndrome and on the state of postural muscle balance in the early postoperative period in patients with degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the lumbar spine who have undergone decompressive-stabilizing interventions. Material and methods: This paper comparatively analyzed the level of pain syndrome in the lumbar spine and lower extremities, the stabilometric indicators characterizing the amplitude of center-of-pressure oscillations in patients who had undergone decompressive-stabilizing operations at 7±2 days after surgical treatment for degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the lumbar spine. Two groups of 60 people in each were formed: rehabilitation measures were implemented, starting on day 2 of an early postoperative period (the duration of the latter was 7±2 days after surgery); the basic complex was supplemented with stabilometric training in Group 1 (a study group); only the basic complex was used in Group 2 (a comparison group). Results: In the study group, the frequency of rehabilitation outcomes with an achieved excellent result depending on the level of pain syndrome in the lower extremities and spine on a visual analogue scale was 62.5 and 88.9%, respectively; which significantly statistically exceeds the proportion of patients with the same outcome in the comparison group (37.5 and 11.1%; p<0.01 in both cases). There was a statistically significant more pronounced decrease in the level of pain syndrome in the lumbar spine (p=0.0001) and lower limbs (p=0.003) in the patients of the study group in the early postoperative period. Intergroup comparison revealed a statistically significant decrease in all the indicators monitored in the study, which characterize the amplitude of the center-of-pressure oscillations. Moreover, the value of the oscillation area parameter between the patient groups differed by 1.76 and 1.83 times during Romberg's test with the eyes open or closed, respectively (p=0.0001). Conclusion: The findings suggest that the comprehensive treatment supplemented with stabilometric training in the early postoperative period improves the state of postural muscle balance. There was a statistically significant predominance of compliance with normative values in patients of the study group during Romberg's test with the eyes open or closed (p=0.007 and p=0.00002, respectively), which contributes to a more marked decrease in the level of pain syndrome in the lumbar spine (p=0.001) and lower extremities (p=0.003).

Postoperative Rehabilitation for Thoracic Disc Herniation in a Professional Rugby Player: A Case Report

Article

Full-text available

Oct 2022

Tanaka Kohei

Thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is a very rare condition compared to cervical and lumbar disc herniation. Patients commonly attend rehabilitation programs after surgery, and the beneficial effects of rehabilitation for cervical and lumbar disc herniation have been reported. However, a postoperative rehabilitation program for patients with TDH has not yet been reported. This case report describes a postoperative rehabilitation program and chronological changes in physical function after surgery for TDH in a professional rugby player. We report the case of a 31-year-old male professional rugby player diagnosed with TDH at T1-T3 and ossification of the yellow ligament at T2-T3. It was difficult for the patient to walk because of the severe spasticity in the lower extremities. The patient underwent surgery to remove the ossified yellow ligament at T2-T3 and posterior thoracic interbody fusion (PTIF) at T1-T3. Rehabilitation programs such as joint mobilization and stability training were initiated after surgery. Spasticity gradually decreased, and the patient could walk unassisted three weeks after surgery and return to field training four months after surgery. This case report suggests that a postoperative rehabilitation program could be safely provided to patients with TDH in the early postoperative period, which may be effective in improving physical function.

Team Approach: Management of an Acute L4-L5 Disc Herniation

Article

Oct 2021

»: Lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common spinal pathologies, often occurring at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. The highest incidence has been reported in patients between the fourth and sixth decades of life. »: The severity of symptoms is influenced by the patient's risk factors, the location, and the extent and type of disc herniation. »: Lumbar disc herniation can be effectively treated with multiple treatment protocols. In most cases, first-line treatment includes oral analgesic medication, activity modification, and physical therapy. When nonoperative treatments do not provide adequate relief, patients may elect to undergo a fluoroscopically guided contrast-enhanced epidural steroid injection. A subgroup of patients whose condition is refractory to any type of nonoperative modalities will proceed to surgery, most commonly an open or minimally invasive discectomy. »: The treatment algorithm for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation often is a stepwise approach: failure of initial nonoperative measures leads to more aggressive treatment when symptoms mandate and, as such, necessitates the use of a multidisciplinary team approach. The core team should consist of an interventional physiatrist, an orthopaedic surgeon, a physician assistant, and a physical therapist. Additional team members may include nurses, radiologists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, spine fellows, psychologists, and case managers. »: This review article describes a case scenario that uses a multidisciplinary team approach for the treatment of an acute L4-L5 disc herniation in a 31-year-old patient without any major comorbidities.

Intensive supervised rehabilitation versus less supervised rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Article

Mar 2021
J SCI MED SPORT

Objective To investigate whether intensive supervised rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction leads to superior self-reported function and sports participation compared to less supervised rehabilitation. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources We performed electronic database searches in several key databases and trial registries (e.g. MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov) to April 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing supervised rehabilitation to rehabilitation with a similar protocol that used less supervised sessions for athletes following ACL reconstruction. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to evaluate methodological quality and GRADE to evaluate overall quality of evidence. Self-reported function and sports participation were the primary outcomes. Data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses. Results Our search retrieved 4075 articles. Seven articles reporting on six RCTs were included (n = 353). Very-low to low-certainty evidence suggests intensive supervised rehabilitation is not superior to less supervised rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction for improving self-reported function, sports participation, knee flexor and extensor strength, range of motion, sagittal plane knee laxity, single leg hop performance, or quality of life. Conclusion Based on uncertain evidence, intensive supervised rehabilitation is not superior to less supervised rehabilitation for athletes following ACL reconstruction. Although high-quality RCTs are needed to provide more certain evidence, clinicians should engage athletes in shared decision making to ensure athletes’ rehabilitation decisions align with current evidence on supervised rehabilitation as well as their preferences and values.

Adding 3-month patient data improves prognostic models of 12-month disability, pain, and satisfaction after specific lumbar spine surgical procedures: Development and validation of a prediction model

Article

Dec 2019
SPINE J

Background context: Prognostic models including early post-operative variables may provide optimal estimates of long-term outcomes and help direct post-operative care. Purpose: To develop and validate prognostic models for 12-month disability, back pain, leg pain, and satisfaction among patients undergoing microdiscectomy, laminectomy, and laminectomy with fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions. Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study using the Quality Outcomes Database. Patient sample: Patients receiving elective lumbar spine surgery due to degenerative spine conditions. Outcome measures: Oswestry Disability Index, pain numerical rating scale, and NASS Patient Satisfaction Index METHODS: Prognostic models were developed using proportional odds ordinal logistic regression using patient characteristics and baseline and 3-month patient reported outcome scores. Models were fit for each outcome stratified by type of surgical procedure. Adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were reported for all predictors by procedure. Models were internally validated using bootstrap resampling. Discrimination was reported as the c-index and calibration was presented using the calibration slope. We compared the performance of models with and without 3-month patient-reported variables. This research was supported by the Foundation for Physical Therapy's Center of Excellence in Physical Therapy Health Services and Health Policy Research and Training Grant. Results: The sample consisted of 5840 patients receiving a microdiscectomy (n=2085), laminectomy (n=1837), or laminectomy with fusion (n=1918). The 3-month Oswestry score was the strongest and most consistent predictor associated with 12-month outcomes. All prognostic models performed well with overfitting-corrected c-index values ranging from 0.718 to 0.795 and all optimism corrected calibration slopes over 0.92. The increase in c-index values ranged from 0.09 to 0.21 when adding 3 month patient-reported outcome scores. Conclusions: Models had good discrimination and were well calibrated for estimating 12-month disability, back pain, leg pain, and satisfaction. Patient-reported outcomes at 3-months after surgery, especially 3-month Oswestry scores, improved the 12-month performance of all prognostic models beyond using only baseline variables.

Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative neuroscience education for patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy

Article

Full-text available

Dec 2016

Background: Results from a previous multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) on preoperative pain neuroscience education (PNE) for lumbar radiculopathy found no significant difference in patient reported outcomes between groups. However, patients who received PNE viewed their surgical experience more favorably and utilized significantly less healthcare compared to those that did not. The purpose is to determine if the reduction in healthcare costs from 1-year would be continued at 3-year following surgery, and to explore differences (if any) in patient reported outcomes. Study design—analysis of 3-year follow-up data from RCT on preoperative PNE for lumbar radiculopathy. Methods: Participating patients from the previous RCT were contacted for 3-year follow-up. Of the 67 patients who commenced in the study, there were 61 who completed 1-year follow-up. Data packets were sent to these 61 patients to examine post-operative utilization of healthcare (Utilization of Healthcare Questionnaire); LBP [numeric rating scale (NRS)]; leg pain (NRS); function (Oswestry disability index); and beliefs and experiences related to LS (10 item survey with Likert responses). Results: At 3-year follow-up, 50 patients (29 females) responded, with 22 patients in the experimental group (EG) and 28 in the control group (CG). Cumulative medical expenses were 37% lower for the EG, with those patients spending less on X-rays and visits to their family physician, physical therapist, and massage therapist. There were no differences in patient reported outcomes between groups. Patients who received PNE continued to view their surgical experience more favorably compared to those that did not. Conclusions: Adding a single PNE session prior to surgery for lumbar radiculopathy results in significant healthcare savings over 3 years. Educating such patients about normal responses to lumbar surgery (LS) in a neuroscience framework may result in lasting behavior changes following surgery.

The Effect of Exercise Post Vertebral Augmentation In Osteoporotic Patients: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Article

Full-text available

May 2023
J ORTHOP RES

This meta-analysis investigated the effects of exercise on visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores following vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in osteoporotic fractures. A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE (Elsevier), CiNAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from database inception to 6th October 2022. Eligible studies reported osteoporosis patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of at least one vertebral fracture via radiography or clinical assessment. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022340791). Ten studies met the eligibility criteria (n= 889). VAS scores at baseline were 7.75 (95% CI: 7.54, 7.97, I2 =76.11%). Following initiation of exercise, VAS scores at the endpoint of 12 months were 1.91 (95% CI: 1.53, 2.29, I2 =92.69%). ODI scores at baseline were 68.66 (95% CI: 56.19, 81.13, I2 =85%). Following initiation of exercise, ODI scores at the endpoint of 12 months were 21.20 (95% CI: 14.52, 27.87, I2 =99.30). A two-arm analysis demonstrated improved VAS and ODI for the exercise group compared to non-exercise control at 6 months (MD=-0.70, 95% CI: -1.08, -0.32, I2 =87% and MD=-6.48, 95% CI: -7.52, -5.44, I2 =46% respectively) and 12 months (MD=-0.88, 95% CI: -1.27, -0.49, I2 =85% and MD=-9.62, 95% CI: -13.24, -5.99, I2 =93%). Refracture was the only adverse event reported and occurred almost twice as frequently in the non-exercise group than exercise. Exercise rehabilitation post vertebral augmentation is associated with improved pain and functionality, particularly after 6 months of exposure, and may reduce refracture rate. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Neighborhood-level Socioeconomic Status, Extended Length of Stay, and Discharge Disposition Following Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery

Article

Full-text available

Nov 2022

Background In the context of increased attention afforded to hospital efficiency and improved but safe patient throughput, decreasing unnecessary hospital length of stay (LOS) is imperative. Given that lumbar spine procedures may be among a hospital's most profitable services, identifying patients at risk of increased healthcare resource utilization prior to surgery is a valuable opportunity to develop targeted pre- and peri-operative intervention and quality improvement initiatives. The purpose of the present investigation was to examine patient factors that predict prolonged LOS as well as discharge disposition following elective, posterior, lumbar spine surgery. Methods We employed a retrospective cohort analysis on 779 consecutive patients treated with lumbar surgery without fusion. Our primary outcome measures were extended LOS (three or more midnights) and discharge disposition. Patient sociodemographic, procedural, and discharge characteristics were adjusted for in our analysis. Sociodemographic variables included Area of Deprivation Index (ADI), a comprehensive metric of socioeconomic status, utilizing income, education, employment, and housing quality based on patient zip code. Multivariable logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to assess whether covariates were independently predictive of extended LOS and discharge disposition, respectively. Results 779 patients were studied, with a median age of 66 years (±15) and a median LOS of 1 midnight (range, 1-10 midnights). Patients in the most disadvantaged ADI quintile (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.48 95% CI 1.15-5.47), those who underwent a minimally-invasive or tubular retractor surgery (aOR 3.03 95% CI 1.02-8.56), those who had an intra-operative drain placed (aOR 4.46 95% CI 2.53-7.26), who had a cerebrospinal fluid leak (aOR 3.46 95% CI 1.55-7.58), who were discharged anywhere but home (aOR 17.11 95% CI 9.24-33.00), and those who were evaluated by physical therapy (aOR 7.23 95% CI 2.13-45.30) or OT (aOR 2.20 95% CI 1.13-4.22) had a significantly increased chance of an extended LOS. Preoperative opioid use was not associated with an increased LOS following surgery (aOR 1.12 95% CI 0.56-1.46). Extended LOS was not associated with post-discharge emergency department representation or unplanned readmission within 90 days following discharge (p=0.148). Patients who were older (aOR 1.99 95% CI 1.62-2.48), in higher quintiles on ADI (3rd quintile; aOR 1.90 95% CI 1.12-3.23, 4th quintile; aOR 1.79, 95% CI 1.05-3.05, 5th quintile; aOR 2.16 95% CI 1.26-3.75), who had a CSF leak (aOR 2.18 95% CI 1.22-3.86), or who had a longer procedure duration (aOR 1.38 95% CI 1.17-1.62) were more likely to require additional services or be sent to a subacute facility upon discharge. Conclusion Patient sociodemographics, along with procedural factors, and discharge disposition were all associated with an increased likelihood of prolonged LOS and resource intensive discharges following elective lumbar spine surgery. Several of these factors could be reliably identified pre-operatively and may be amenable to targeted preoperative intervention. Improving discharge disposition planning in the peri-operative period may allow for more efficient use of hospitalization and inpatient and post-acute resources.

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Management of Musculoskeletal Affections in Canines

Article

Full-text available

Sep 2022

The present work done on physiotherapy and rehabilitation techniques of locomotor system in canine practice is very meagre, especially on physical assessment and diagnostic findings of chronic complains of locomotor affections especially musculoskeletal in dogs with failed medical treatment and no surgical intervention was possible. Nine dogs (5 in the age group of >5 years, three of age group of 1 to 5 years, and one in the age group of <1 year) ;6, males and 3 females represented with affections of the musculoskeletal system were included in the present study, amongst which 3 cases were of hind quarter weakness and 6 cases of muscles strain, wherein physiotherapy was employed. All nine clinical cases were subjected to a detailed examination, including comprehensive neurological examination, diagnostic imaging, goniometry and haemato-biochemical estimations. All patients were treated with different types of physiotherapy modalities and rehabilitation techniques and observed the effectiveness of physiotherapy. Physiotherapy management of patients had early and optimal resumptions of functions. The rehabilitation modalities provided meritorious treatment options for symptomatic pain relief in patients, resulting in improved quality of life.

Postoperative rehabilitation of neurosurgical patients after spinal cord surgery – results of our own study

Article

Full-text available

Feb 2022

Aim. To assess the extent to which cognitive and emotional disorders in patients undergoing spinal cord surgery affect the quality of rehabilitation and, based on the data obtained, to suggest optimization of rehabilitation measures. Materials and methods. The study included 60 patients (30 men and 30 women) whose condition required spinal cord surgery. All patients underwent assessment of somatic and neurological status, as well as quantitative neuropsychological testing. The influence of cognitive and emotional disorders before and after surgery on the severity of pain syndrome and movement disorders was assessed. When included in the study, patients were randomized into the main (30 people) and control (30 people) group. The patients of the main group received cognitive-motor training, which was carried out using the methodological manual Cognitive Training for Patients with Moderate Cognitive Impairment, developed by the staff of the Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery of the Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University). Cognitive, emotional, motor disorders, severity of pain syndrome, as well as the quality of life and adherence of patients to cognitive-motor training were assessed 3 and 6 months after the surgical intervention.The severity of cognitive and emotional disorders in patients of the main and control groups did not differ before the operation. Results. After the operation, the severity of cognitive impairments was significantly higher in patients of the control group (p=0.03). Patients in the control group were significantly worse than patients in the main group in performing memory tasks (p=0.00), they also had a significantly lower rate of mental processes (p=0.00). These differences persisted 3 months after surgery (p=0.00). A week after the surgical intervention, the severity of anxiety and depression was significantly higher in patients in the control group (p=0.01). The positive effect of the operation in the form of pain reduction was achieved in all patients, but in the control group there was an increase in the severity of the pain syndrome after six months of observation compared with that after three months. An increase in the severity of the pain syndrome was associated with an increase in depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. The analysis showed that patients of the main group with high adherence to cognitive training showed significantly greater positive dynamics both in terms of cognitive functions and in terms of anxiety and depression (p0.05). A survey of patients after inclusion in the study with the provision of prospective recommendations for clinical care showed the following: 58 patients (96.7% of patients) noted that the proposed recommendations for clinical care, from their point of view, would significantly improve their postoperative prognosis. Important points that should be reflected in the clinical guidelines for the management of patients with spinal cord surgery, from the point of view of patients, were: discussion with the doctor of the picture of their illness, duration of hospitalization, expected outcome, prognosis (60 patients, 100%), medical education rehabilitation skills (51 patients, 85% of patients), communicating with patients who have already undergone a similar operation earlier in this surgical department (49 patients, 81.7%), ensuring continuity and discussing the entire rehabilitation route before surgery (60 patients, 100%). Conclusion. Cognitive and emotionally disorders determine the quality of life and rehabilitation of patients who have undergone surgery on the spinal cord. Our results allow us to recommend the inclusion of cognitive-motor training in the rehabilitation program for patients after spinal neurosurgical operations.

The Effect of Lower-Limb Exercise on Pain Management of the Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Article

Full-text available

Dec 2021
Pain Res Manag

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical effect of lower-limb exercise, when combined with celecoxib, on pain management of patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgeries. Methods: The patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgeries between 01/2018 and 06/2021 were retrospectively identified, with their data collected. After surgery, some patients took celecoxib for analgesia (celecoxib group, 200 mg/day) while the others took celecoxib together with lower-limb exercise (combined group, celecoxib-200 mg/day). On postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 7, and 14, data were collected and analyzed regarding the following items: patient satisfaction, lower-limb muscle force, lumbar JOA score (29 points), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) score. Results: A total of 225 participants were included in this study. Specifically, 120 cases were admitted into in the celecoxib group and 105 were included in the combined group. Comparisons of baseline data did not indicate any difference between the combined group and the celecoxib group. Data analysis showed that patient satisfaction in the combined group was significantly higher than the celecoxib group on POD 3, 7, and 14, respectively (all p < 0.001). Moreover, the combined group had less VAS score compared with the celecoxib group on POD 3, 7, and 14, respectively (all p < 0.01). In addition, lower-limb muscle force in the combined group was significantly stronger than that in the celecoxib group on POD 3 and POD 7, respectively (both p < 0.01). Furthermore, the combined group achieved less ODI score than the celecoxib group on POD 3, 7, and 14, respectively (all p < 0.05). Comparisons of the lumbar JOA score did not suggest any statistical difference during the whole follow-up period. Conclusions: In conclusion, postoperative lower-limb rehabilitation exercise can help to release pain after lumbar fusion surgeries. Additionally, postoperative lower-limb exercise can facilitate the recovery of lower-limb muscle force, as well as improving patient satisfaction.

Is there a relationship between lower lumbar disc herniation and multifidus muscle volume in postmenopausal women?

Article

Full-text available

May 2021

The effect of pedometer-supported walking and telemonitoring after disc hernia surgery on pain and disability levels and quality of life

Article

Full-text available

Feb 2021
Int J Nurs Pract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pedometer-supported walking and telemonitoring after lumbar disc hernia surgery on pain and disability levels and quality of life. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial with two randomly selected groups conducted between March 2018 and January 2019. Sixty-seven participants (33 in the intervention group and 34 in the control group) who had undergone lumbar microdiscectomy were allocated to receive and not to receive walking exercise. Pain and disability levels and quality of life of groups were tested with the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index and the 36-Item Short Form Survey. Measurements were taken 3 weeks after surgery and following completion of the first, second and third months. Results: Compared with the control group, pain level at the first and second months and disability level at the second and third months in the intervention group were significantly lower (p < 0.05), and in the third month, subdimension scores of quality of life (the physical role difficulty, energy and vitality, mental health, social functionality and pain) were higher (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Walking after herniated disc surgery decreased pain and disability levels and increased the quality of life; nurses can encourage adherence to walking as an effective intervention.

Electroacupuncture with Usual Care for Patients with Non-Acute Pain after Back Surgery: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial

Article

Full-text available

Jun 2020

Electroacupuncture (EA) is used to treat pain after back surgery. Although this treatment is covered by national health insurance in Korea, evidence supporting its cost-effectiveness and contribution to the sustainability of the national health care system has yet to be published. Therefore, an economic evaluation, alongside a clinical trial, was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness of EA and usual care (UC) versus UC alone to treat non-acute low back pain (LBP). In total, 108 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to treatment groups; 106 were included in the final cost utility analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EA plus UC was estimated as 7,048,602 Korean Rate Won (KRW) per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the societal perspective (SP). If the national threshold was KRW 30 million per QALY, the cost-effectiveness probability of EA plus UC was an estimated 85.9%; and, if the national threshold was over KRW 42,496,372 per QALY, the cost-effectiveness probability would be over 95% percent statistical significance. Based on these results, EA plus UC combination therapy for patients with non-acute LBP may be cost-effective from a societal perspective in Korea.

Clinical Rehabilitation Effect of Postoperative Lower-Limb Training on the Patients Undergoing OLIF Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Article

Full-text available

Jan 2020
Pain Res Manag

Background: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the clinical rehabilitation effect of lower-limb training on the patients that undergo oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedures. Methods: The eligible participants undergoing OLIF procedures between 01/2017 and 07/2019 were identified. All the patients underwent one-segment fusion operation (L3-4 or L4-5). Based on whether the participants received postoperative rehabilitation training, they were divided into two groups: intervention group and control group. Postoperatively, the participants in the intervention group were trained with lower-extremity rehabilitation exercise and maintained for three months. All participants got reexamined at the first postoperative week, the second postoperative week, the first postoperative month, and the third postoperative month (last follow-up). Comparisons were made in terms of the lower-extremity muscle force, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, lumbar JOA score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and patient satisfaction. Results: Seventy-seven participants in the intervention group (32 males and 45 females) and 82 in the control group (39 males and 43 females) were incorporated in this study. The median age of the participants was 57 years (39∼73) in the intervention group and 54 years (35∼71) in the control group. No statistical significance between the two groups was found (P > 0.05). ODI score was less in the intervention group as compared to the control group in the first week after surgery (P=0.029). VAS and JOA scores were better in the intervention group in the first two weeks after surgery (P < 0.05). DVT incidence in the intervention group was lower than the control group at final follow-up (P=0.037). Both group participants have achieved good grading in muscle force rehabilitation but no significant differences between the two groups. Additionally, satisfaction was higher in the intervention group than the control group. Conclusions: In summary, postoperative lower-extremity rehabilitation exercise can effectively accelerate patients' health recovery from the OLIF surgery and increase their satisfaction.

Postoperatives Management der Belastung und Rehabilitation nach lumbalen WirbelsäulenoperationenPostoperative management of weight bearing and rehabilitation after lumbar spinal surgery

Article

Aug 2019

Background Because of the growing trend of lumbar spinal surgery, it is essential for physicians and physiotherapists to develop standardized postoperative treatment. However, currently postoperative treatment after lumbar spinal surgery is controversial. Purpose of the study The purpose of this review article is to make recommendations for the postoperative treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc surgery, lumbar decompression surgery and lumbar spinal fusion surgery regarding mobilization, weight bearing and rehabilitation. These recommendations are based on current evidence and experience in our institution. Materials and methods A selective literature research of relevant publications was conducted in Pubmed. The studies are presented in tabular form. Results Patient training, accurate information about the postoperative course, information about limitations and stress possibilities as well as pain management seem to have an important role in the final outcome of the operation. Ideally, these procedures should be performed preoperatively or at the latest or repeatedly from the first postoperative day after lumbar spine surgery. Physiotherapy can have a positive impact on the clinical and functional outcome after lumbar disc, decompression and fusion surgery. Discussion Due to the heterogeneity of the intensity, duration and form of physiotherapy or rehabilitation, which are listed as interventions in the various studies, it is only possible to draw limited conclusions about general instructions for action on “physiotherapy” after spinal surgery.

A Modern Pain Neuroscience Approach in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Clinical Perspective

Article

Jul 2019
PHYS THER

Around 20% of patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy develop chronic pain after surgery, leading to high socioeconomic burden. Current perioperative interventions, including education and rehabilitation, are not always effective in preventing prolonged or chronic postoperative pain and disability. Here, a shift in educational intervention from a biomedical towards a biopsychosocial approach for people scheduled for lumbar surgery is proposed. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a biopsychosocial approach that aims to decrease the threat value of pain by reconceptualizing pain and increasing the patient's knowledge about pain. This paper provides a clinical perspective for the provision of perioperative PNE, specifically developed for patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Besides the general goals of PNE, perioperative PNE aims to prepare the patient for postsurgical pain and how to cope with it.

Effectiveness of core stabilization exercises in relation to conventional physiotherapy treatment after disc excision

Article

Full-text available

Aug 2012

Purpose of study: The objectives of this study was to determine the efficacy of physiotherapy for the relief of lumbar radicular pain and restoring functional abilities after lumber disc excision Methodology: A sample of 30 patients was taken from February 2011 to March 2012.VAS (visual analog scale) for pain intensity & Barthel Scales for functional disabillity were two dependent variables in study. Results: 30 cases fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. Efficacy of Physiotherapy was determined by improvement in visual analog scale and restoring functional abilities by Barthel scale Conclusion: Core stabilization exercises after limited disc excision either through hemilaminectomy or fenestration is a safe, effective and reliable physiotherapy technique for treating properly selected patients of sciatica due to prolapsed intervertebral disc at L4-5 and L5-S1 level. Core stabilization exercises provides maximum relief from Radicular Pain after disc Excision

Choosing Wisely after a sport and exercise-related injury

Article

Feb 2019
BEST PRACT RES CL RH

Low-value care is receiving substantial attention in many fields of medicine but little-to-none in sports medicine. Common interventions for sport and exercise-related injuries include medical imaging, medication, surgery and rehabilitation, but there is emerging evidence of the inappropriate use of these interventions. This chapter aims to increase awareness of low-value care in sports medicine by answering four key clinical questions: Does my patient need imaging? When is it appropriate to prescribe opioids? Does my patient need surgery? Does it matter how rehabilitation is delivered? Increasing awareness of low-value care in sports medicine will ensure patients with sport or exercise-related injuries avoid care that provides little-to-no benefit or causes harm and receive care that is evidence based and truly necessary. There are many situations when imaging, opioids, surgery and supervised rehabilitation are entirely appropriate. However, this chapter considers contexts where use of these interventions could be considered unnecessary and potentially harmful.

Perioperative pain neuroscience education

Presentation

Jun 2018

Eva Huysmans

Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain

Article

Full-text available

Nov 2017

To standardize outcome reporting in clinical trials of patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP), an international multidisciplinary panel recommended physical functioning, pain intensity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as core outcome domains. Given the lack of consensus on measurement instruments for these three domains in patients with LBP, this study aimed to generate such consensus. The measurement properties of 17 patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning, three for pain intensity, and five for HRQoL were appraised in three systematic reviews following COSMIN methodology. Researchers, clinicians and patients (n = 207) were invited in a two-round Delphi survey to generate consensus ( ≥ 67% agreement among participants) on which instruments to endorse. Response rates were 44% and 41%, respectively. In Round 1, consensus was achieved on the Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1a (ODI 2.1a) for physical functioning (78% agreement) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity (75% agreement). No consensus was achieved on any HRQoL instrument, although the Short Form 12 (SF12) approached the consensus threshold (64% agreement). In Round 2, consensus was reached on a NRS version with a 1-week recall period (96% agreement). Various participants requested one free-to-use instrument per domain. Considering all issues together, recommendations on core instruments were formulated: ODI 2.1a or 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for physical functioning, NRS for pain intensity, SF12 or 10-item PROMIS Global Health form for HRQoL. Further studies need to fill the evidence gaps on the measurement properties of these and other instruments.

Early rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery is not effective or cost-effective compared to no referral: A randomised trial and economic evaluation

Article

Full-text available

Jun 2017

Question: Is referral for early rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery effective and cost-effective compared to no referral? Design: Multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, and economic evaluation with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat-analysis. Participants: Adults who underwent discectomy for a herniated lumbar disc, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, and signs of nerve root compression corresponding to the herniation level. Intervention: Early rehabilitation (exercise therapy) for 6 to 8 weeks, versus no referral, immediately after discharge. Outcome measures: In line with the recommended core outcome set, the co-primary outcomes were: functional status (Oswestry Disability Index); leg and back pain (numerical rating scale 0 to 10); global perceived recovery (7-point Likert scale); and general physical and mental health (SF12), assessed 3, 6, 9, 12 and 26 weeks after surgery. The outcomes for the economic evaluation were quality of life and costs, measured at 6, 12 and 26 weeks after surgery. Results: There were no clinically relevant or statistically significant overall mean differences between rehabilitation and control for any outcome adjusted for baseline characteristics: global perceived recovery (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.7), functional status (MD 1.5, 95% CI -3.6 to 6.7), leg pain (MD 0.1, 95% CI -0.7 to 0.8), back pain (MD 0.3, 95% CI -0.3 to 0.9), physical health (MD -3.5, 95% CI -11.3 to 4.3), and mental health (MD -4.1, 95% CI -9.4 to 1.3). After 26 weeks, there were no significant differences in quality-adjusted life years (MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.04 points) and societal costs (MD -€527, 95% CI -2846 to 1506). The maximum probability for the intervention to be cost-effective was 0.75 at a willingness-to-pay of €32 000/quality-adjusted life year. Conclusion: Early rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery was neither more effective nor more cost-effective than no referral. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register NTR3156. [Oosterhuis T, Ostelo RW, van Dongen JM, Peul WC, de Boer MR, Bosmans JE, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Arts MP, van Tulder MW (2017) Early rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery is not effective or cost-effective compared to no referral: a randomised trial and economic evaluation. Journal of Physiotherapy XX: XX-XX].

Correlation between intervertebral disc degeneration, paraspinal muscle atrophy, and lumbar facet joints degeneration in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Article

Full-text available

Apr 2017
BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS

Background To assess the correlation between lumbar disc degeneration (LDD), multifidus muscle atrophy (LMA), and facet joints degeneration in patients with L4-L5 lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods Sixty patients with L4-L5 LDH diagnosed by a 1.5 T MRI scanner were enrolled in the study group and another 60 patients with non-specific back pain were enrolled in the control group. LDD, LMA, and facet joints degeneration were examined and analyzed independently by two independent orthopedic surgeons using T2-weighted images. Wilcoxon test was used for analyzing the difference of LDD and facet joints degeneration between L3-L4 and L5-S1 and difference of LMA between the herniated and control groups. Correlation analysis of the three degeneration grades at the same level was determined by Spearman rank correlation test. Results In the herniated group, most LMA at L3-L4 level was grade 1 (42, 70.0%); grade 2 (33, 55.0%) at L4-L5 level; and grade 3 (27, 45.0%) at L5-S1 level. LMA and LDD grading were significantly different between L3-L4 and L5-S1 levels (P < 0.05). In the herniation group, the Spearman value for LDD and LMA grading were 0.352 (P < 0.01) at L3-L4 and 0.036 (P > 0.05) at the L5-S1 level. The differences in LMA between the herniated and control groups at the three levels were significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions Disc degeneration and multifidus muscles atrophy were positively correlated at the L3-L4 disc level. A lumbar extension muscle strengthening program could be helpful in preventing muscle atrophy and lumbar spinal degeneration.

Descriptive analysis of a 1:1 physiotherapy outpatient intervention post primary lumbar discectomy: One arm of a small-scale parallel randomised controlled trial across two UK sites

Article

Full-text available

Nov 2016

Abstract Objective There is a lack of high-quality evidence for physiotherapy post lumbar discectomy. Substantial heterogeneity in treatment effects may be explained by variation in quality, administration and components of interventions. An optimised physiotherapy intervention may reduce heterogeneity and improve patient benefit. The objective was to describe, analyse and evaluate an optimised 1:1 physiotherapy outpatient intervention for patients following primary lumbar discectomy, to provide preliminary insights. Design A descriptive analysis of the intervention embedded within an external pilot and feasibility trial. Setting Two UK spinal centres. Participants Participants aged ≥18; post primary, single level, lumbar discectomy were recruited. Intervention The intervention encompassed education, advice, mobility and core stability exercises, progressive exercise, and encouragement of early return to work/activity. Patients received ≤8 sessions for ≤8 weeks, starting 4 weeks post surgery (baseline). Outcomes Blinded outcome assessment at baseline and 12 weeks (post intervention) included the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. STarT Back data were collected at baseline. Statistical analyses summarised participant characteristics and preplanned descriptive analyses. Thematic analysis grouped related data. Findings Twenty-two of 29 allocated participants received the intervention. STarT Back categorised n=16 (55%) participants ‘not at low risk’. Physiotherapists identified reasons for caution for 8 (36%) participants, commonly risk of overdoing activity (n=4, 18%). There was no relationship between STarT Back and physiotherapists’ evaluation of caution. Physiotherapists identified 154 problems (mean (SD) 5.36 (2.63)). Those ‘not at low risk’, and/or requiring caution presented with more problems, and required more sessions (mean (SD) 3.14 (1.16)). Conclusions Patients present differently and therefore require tailored interventions. These differences may be identified using clinical reasoning and outcome data.

Letter to Editor concerning “Long-term outcome of redo discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniations” by Cunha et al. (Eur Spine J [2023]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07493-4)

Article

Mar 2023

Postoperative Management of Sequelae, Complications, and Readmissions Following Outpatient Transforaminal Lumbar Endoscopy

Chapter

Sep 2022

Contemporary Endoscopic Spine Surgery brings the reader the most up-to-date information on the endoscopy of the spine. Key opinion leaders from around the world have come together to present the clinical evidence behind their competitive endoscopic spinal surgery protocols. Chapters in the series cover a range of aspects of spine surgery including spinal pain generators, preoperative workup with modern independent predictors of favorable clinical outcomes with endoscopy, anesthesia in an outpatient setting, management of complications, and a fresh look at technology advances in a historical context. The reader will have a first-row seat during the illustrative discussions of expanded surgical indications from herniated disc to more complex clinical problems, including stenosis, instability, and deformity in patients with advanced degenerative disease of the human spine. Contemporary Endoscopic Spine Surgery is divided into three volumes: Cervical Spine, Lumbar Spine, and Advanced Technologies to capture an accurate snapshot in time of this fast-moving field. It is intended as a comprehensive go-to reference text for surgeons in graduate residency and postgraduate fellowship training programs and for practicing spine surgeons interested in looking for the scientific foundation for expanding their clinical practice towards endoscopic surgery. This volume (Advanced Technologies) covers the following endoscopic spine surgery topics in 19 detailed chapters: endoscopic intradiscal therapy and foraminoplasty, evidence based medicine in spine surgery, artificial intelligence for spine surgery, postoperative management, transforaminal lumbar endoscopy and associated complications, laser applications in full endoscopy of the spine, high frequency surgery for the treatment of herniated discs, lumbar MRI, cost and maintenance management of endoscopic spine systems, regenerative medicine, interbody fusion, endoscopic intravertebral canal decompression after spinal fracture, treatment of lumbar tuberculosis, treatment of degenerative scoliosis, treatment of thoracic meningioma with spinal canal decompression, and cervical endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (CE-ULBD).

Assessment of Effectiveness of Usage Complex Manual Therapy in Patients with Lumbar Flexion Dysfunction After Discectomy, in Comparison to Standard Physiotherapy Based on Physical Therapy, Balneotherapy and Sensorimotor Exercises

Article

Jan 2022

Aim: The purpose of this study was to asset the effectiveness of complex manual therapy usage in patients with lumbar flexion dysfunction after discectomy, in comparison to standard physiotherapy based on physical therapy, balneotherapy and sensorimotor exercises. Material and methods: The study was conducted in the participation of 40 patients attending outpatient rehabilitation at ORNR “Krzeszowice” SP ZOZ. Participants were divided into two groups (control and experimental) each one including 20 people. The average patients’ age was 52.75 (± 11.58). The patients had been medically examined before the rehabilitation process implementation and after its completion. The test was carried out using the patient’s card, Laitinen’s scale and mobility tests with a plurimeter. Rehabilitation has taken place for four weeks daily. The exercises of the patients from the experimental group were based on comprehensive manual therapy meanwhile the control group underwent a standard package of physical therapy, balneotherapy and sensorimotor exercises. Results: Two statistically significant phenomena were observed in both groups: decrease of pain in the lower spine and the range motion improvement, nevertheless, both results were significantly greater in the experimental group. Conclusions: Both therapeutic programs indicate an advantageous impact in terms of reducing pain and functioning in everyday life, but the manual therapy is much more effective.

Rehabilitation of Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Case Report

Article

Full-text available

Jan 2022

IJPOT July-Sept. 2020

Research

Full-text available

Dec 2020

Accelerometry-based physical activity, disability and quality of life before and after lumbar decompression surgery from a physiotherapeutic perspective: An observational cohort study

Article

Full-text available

Oct 2021

Background: The effect of lumbar decompression on physical activity (PA) measures (measured as number of steps/day and as moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA)) is poorly understood. The aim of the current study was to compare PA in patients before and after lumbar decompression and to determine the association between change in steps/day and MVPA with change in disability, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and pain. Methods: Patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery were recruited. Steps/day and MVPA MVPA were recorded with an accelerometer. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), HRQOL (Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36)) and pain levels (visual analogue scale (VAS)) were collected prior to surgery and six and twelve weeks postoperatively. Steps/day were compared to the lower bound of steps/day in healthy persons (7,000 steps per day), and the relationship between changes in steps/day, MVPA, ODI, SF-36, and VAS were calculated. Results: Twenty-six patients aged 37 to 75 years met inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Lumbar decompressions were performed for stenosis and/or disc herniation. Preoperatively, patients took an average 5,073±2,621 (mean±standard deviation) steps/day. At 6 weeks postoperatively, patients took 6,131±2,343 steps/day. At 12 weeks postoperatively, patients took 5,683±2,128 steps/day. Postoperative MVPA minutes per week increased compared to preoperative MVPA (preoperative: 94.6±122.9; 6 weeks: 173.9±181.9; 12 weeks: 145.7±132.8). From preoperative to 12 weeks postoperative, change in steps correlated with MVPA (R=0.775; P<0.001), but not with ODI (R=0.069; P=0.739), SF-36 (R=0.138; P=0.371), VAS in the back (R=0.230; P=0.259) or VAS in the leg (R=-0.123; P=0.550). Conclusions: During the first 12 postoperative weeks, daily steps did not reach the lower bound of normal step activity of 7,000 steps/day, however postoperative steps/day were higher than before surgery. Steps/day and MVPA appear to be independent of ODI and SF-36 and represent additional outcome parameters in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery and should be considered e.g., by physiotherapists especially from 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Level of evidence: 2, prospective cohort study.

Article

Full-text available

Jul 2021

The objective of this study was to determine the association between biases related to attrition, missing data, and the use of intention to treat and changes in effect size estimates in physical therapy randomized trials. A meta-epidemiological study was conducted. A random sample of randomized controlled trials included in meta-analyses in the physical therapy discipline were identified. Data extraction including assessments of the use of intention to treat principle, attrition-related bias, and missing data was conducted independently by two reviewers. To determine the association between these methodological issues and effect sizes, a two-level analysis was conducted using a meta-meta-analytic approach. Three hundred ninety-three trials included in 43 meta-analyses, analyzing 44,622 patients contributed to this study. Trials that did not use the intention-to-treat principle (effect size = −0.13, 95% confidence interval = −0.26 to 0.01) or that were assessed as having inappropriate control of incomplete outcome data tended to underestimate the treatment effect when compared with trials with adequate use of intention to treat and control of incomplete outcome data (effect size = −0.18, 95% confidence interval = −0.29 to −0.08). Researchers and clinicians should pay attention to these methodological issues because they could provide inaccurate effect estimates. Authors and editors should make sure that intention-to-treat and missing data are properly reported in trial reports.

Nucleoplasty: Percutaneous Plasma Disc Decompression for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Article

Full-text available

Jan 2017

The effectiveness of exercise program after lumbar discectomy surgery

Article

Jan 2021

A lumbar herniation disc appears as a major cause of lumbar pain and sciatica. The purpose of the present systematic review is to examine the effectiveness of such exercise programs on pain, disability, quality of life, strength and the assessed time required to return to work/normal activities after undergoing lumbar discectomy surgery. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were used for the selection of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The PEDro scale was chosen to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Seven RCTS met the inclusion criteria. According to the evaluation of the PEDro scale, one was considered as « high quality», five as « moderate quality» and one as « low quality». The mean score of the studies was 5.14. The results showed that after such exercise there was an improvement in pain, disability, quality of life, muscle strength and in time required to return to work. The exercise programs have a positive impact on the reduction of pain, disability, time required to return to work/normal activities as well as an increase in quality of life and muscle strength in patients with lumbar discectomy surgery.

Rehabilitation Following Lumbar Disc Surgery

Chapter

Jan 2018

Adriaan Louw

Spinal Disorders

Chapter

Jan 2011

Robert Manske

Effect of Neurodynamics on Pain and Paresthesia in Post-operated Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Article

Full-text available

Apr 2020

Manipulative and Manual Therapies in the Management of Patients with Prior Lumbar Surgery: A Systematic Review

Preprint

Full-text available

Apr 2020

Background The purpose was to identify, summarize, and rate scholarly literature that describes manipulative and manual therapy following lumbar surgery. Methods The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered with PROSPERO. PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ICL, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched through July 2019. Articles were screened independently by at least two reviewers for inclusion. Articles included described the practice, utilization, and/or clinical decision making to post surgical intervention with manipulative and/or manual therapies. Data extraction consisted of principal findings, pain and function/disability, patient satisfaction, opioid/medication consumption, and adverse events. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network critical appraisal checklists were utilized to assess study quality. Results Literature search yielded 1916 articles, 348 duplicates were removed, 109 full-text articles were screened and 50 citations met inclusion criteria. There were 37 case reports/case series, 3 randomized controlled trials, 3 pilot studies, 5 systematic/scoping/narrative reviews, and 2 commentaries. Conclusion The findings of this review may help inform practitioners who utilize manipulative and/or manual therapies regarding levels of evidence for patients with prior lumbar surgery. Following lumbar surgery, the evidence indicated inpatient neural mobilization does not improve outcomes. There is inconclusive evidence to recommend for or against most manual therapies after most surgical interventions. Trial registration Prospectively registered with PROSPERO (#CRD42020137314). Registered 24 January 2020.

Does Type of Sponsorship of Randomized Controlled Trials Influence Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Rehabilitation: A Meta-Epidemiological Study

Article

Apr 2020

Background: Sponsorship bias could affect research results to inform decision makers when using the results of these trials. The extent to which sponsorship bias affect results in the field of physical therapy has been unexplored in the literature. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of sponsorship bias on the treatment effects of randomized controlled trials in physical therapy area. Methods: This was a meta-epidemiological study. A random sample of randomized controlled trials included in meta-analyses of physical therapy area were identified. Data extraction including assessments of appropriate influence of funders was conducted independently by two reviewers. To determine the association between biases related to sponsorship biases and effect sizes, a two-level analysis was conducted using a meta-meta-analytic approach. Results: We analyzed 393 trials included in 43 meta-analyses. The most common sources of sponsorship for this sample of physical therapy trials were government (n = 205, 52%), followed by academic (n = 44, 11%) and industry (n = 39, 10%). The funding was not declared in a high percentage of the trials (n = 85, 22%). The influence of the trial sponsor was assessed as being appropriate in 246 trials (63%) and considered inappropriate/unclear in 147 (37%) of them. We have moderate evidence to say that trials with inappropriate/unclear influence of funders tended to have on average a larger effect size than those with appropriate influence of funding (effect size = 0.15; 95% confidence interval = -0.03 to 0.33). Conclusions: Based on our sample of physical therapy trials, it seems that most of the trials are funded by either government and academia and a small percentage are funded by the industry. Treatment effect size estimates were on average 0.15 larger in trials with lack of appropriate influence of funders as compared with trials with appropriate influence of funding. Contrarily to other fields, industry funding was relatively small and their influence perhaps less marked. All these results could be explained by the relative youth of the field and/or the absence of clear industry interests. In front of the call for action by the World Health Organization to strengthen rehabilitation in health systems, these results raise the issue of the need of public funding in the field.

Guía Práctica de Salud Laboral para la valoración de: APTITUD EN TRABAJADORES CON RIESGO DE EXPOSICIÓN A CARGA FÍSICA

Book

Full-text available

Jan 2010

Sin lugar a dudas poner a disposición del Médico del Trabajo en ejercicio una nueva herramienta para la mejora de la práctica en su actividad preventiva constituye un paso más en el progreso en salud de la población trabajadora, mucho más cuando su contenido aborda uno de los problemas de salud en el trabajo de mayor incidencia como son los trastornos músculo-esqueléticos derivados de la exposición a carga física. El concepto de carga física incluye un complejo de situaciones clasificables en dos grandes grupos según su naturaleza biomecánica, diferenciando la sobrecarga estática derivada bien del estatismo postural o del mantenimiento de posturas forzadas y la sobrecarga dinámica derivada de la realización de movimientos repetidos o del manejo manual de cargas. La Guía de Aptitud en Trabajadores con Exposición a Carga Física, supone un proyecto que aborda de forma integrada el afrontamiento de estos problemas desde su manejo clínico y preventivo, los criterios sobre la aptitud y la adaptación del puesto de trabajo, hasta los aspectos relacionados con la Incapacidad Laboral tanto Temporal como Permanente. La inclusión de un apartado dirigido al tratamiento y métodos para la Vigilancia Colectiva, constituye un aspecto innovador. La Vigilancia Colectiva constituye la aportación más relevante que desde la Medicina del Trabajo se hace al proceso de Planificación Preventiva por su capacidad de dimensionar la extensión y gravedad de los problemas y por lo tanto jerarquizar las prioridades de intervención. Los datos epidemiológicos que facilitan los Sistemas de Información tanto de Accidentes de Trabajo (DELTA), como de Enfermedades Profesionales (CEPROSS), sitúan a estos problemas en un espacio de atención preferente por parte de los distintos actores que trabajan por la consecución de espacios de trabajo seguros y saludables y en particular de la actuación de los Organismos Públicos y Sociedades Científicas. El convencimiento de la Asociación Española de Especialistas de Medicina del Trabajo (AEEMT) y de la Escuela Nacional de Medicina del Trabajo del Instituto de Salud Carlos III de la necesidad y eficacia del desarrollo de acciones conjuntas para mejorar y fortalecer la Medicina del Trabajo nos ha llevado a una alianza de cooperación uno de cuyos resultados es la presente Guía. Sistematizar el conocimiento en forma de Guía de Buenas Prácticas es un proceso complejo, presidido por el “esfuerzo”, por ello debo trasladar nuestro reconocimiento a los especialistas y expertos que han trabajado en las labores de Coordinación Científica, Coordinación Editorial, Revisión y evidentemente Autoría. Reconocer también la labor de la Junta Directiva de la AEEMT, que ha diseñado una línea de actuación basada en la exigencia, que se traduce en herramientas de oportunidad para la mejora y fortalecimiento de la Medicina del Trabajo y consecuentemente en la mejora de los niveles de Salud de los Trabajadores.

Patient journey following lumbar discectomy surgery: protocol for a single-centre qualitative analysis of the patient rehabilitation experience (DiscJourn)

Article

Full-text available

Aug 2019

Introduction Lumbar discectomy is a widely used surgical procedure internationally with the majority of patients experiencing significant benefit. However, approximately 20% of patients report suboptimal functional recovery and quality of life. The impact and meaning of the surgical experience from the patients’ perspective are not fully understood. Furthermore, there is limited evidence guiding postoperative management with significant clinical practice variation and it is unclear if current postoperative support is valued, beneficial or meets patients’ needs and expectations. This study aims to address the evidence gap by moving beyond current knowledge to gain insight into the lived experiences relating to patients’ lumbar discectomy surgery journey. Results will inform more meaningful and specific care, thus, enhance rehabilitation and outcomes. Methods and analysis A qualitative investigation using interpretative phenomenology analysis (IPA) will provide a flexible inductive research approach. A purposive sample (n=20) of patients undergoing primary discectomy will be recruited from one UK NHS secondary care centre. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted postsurgery discharge. A topic guide, developed from the literature and our previous work with input from two patient co-investigators, will guide interviews with the flexibility to explore interesting or patient-specific points raised. Providing longitudinal data, patients will keep weekly diaries capturing experiences and change over time throughout 12 months following surgery. A second interview will be completed 1 year postsurgery with its topic guide informed by initial findings. This combination of patient interviews and diaries will capture patients’ attitudes and beliefs regarding surgery and recovery, facilitators and barriers to progress, experiences regarding return to activities/function and interactions with healthcare professionals. The rich density of data will be thematically analysed in accordance with IPA, supported by NVivo software. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted by the London-Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee (18/LO/0459; IRAS 241345). Conclusions will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

Pain neuroscience education: Which pain neuroscience education metaphor worked best?

Article

Full-text available

Aug 2019

Background: The use of pain neuroscience education (PNE) has been shown to be effective in reducing pain, improving function and lowering fear and catastrophisation. Pain neuroscience education utilises various stories and metaphors to help patients reconceptualise their pain experience. To date no individualised study has looked at which stories and metaphors may be the most effective in achieving the positive outcomes found with the use of PNE. Objectives: This study examined patient responses to the usefulness of the various stories and metaphors used during PNE for patients who underwent surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Method: Twenty-seven participants who received preoperative PNE from a previous randomised control trial (RCT) were surveyed 1-year post-education utilising a 5-point Likert scale (0 – ‘do not remember’, 4 – ‘very helpful’) on the usefulness of the various stories and metaphors used during the PNE session. Participant demographics and outcomes data (pain intensity, function and pain knowledge) were utilised from the previous RCT for analysis and correlations. Results: Nineteen surveys were returned for a response rate of 70%. No story or metaphor mean was below 2 – ‘neutral’, lowest mean at 2.53; 6 of the 11 stories or metaphors scored a mean above 3 – ‘helpful’. Conclusion: No individual story or metaphor stood out as being predominately important in being helpful in the recovery process through the use of PNE. Clinical implications: The overall messages of reconceptualising pain during PNE may be more important than any individual story or metaphor.

Proposal of East-west Integrative Medicine Manual for Rehabilitation after Lumbar Spine Surgery

Article

Full-text available

Oct 2018

Usefulness of corset adoption after single-level lumbar discectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Article

Full-text available

Feb 2018

OBJECTIVE In this paper, the authors sought to verify whether corset adoption could improve the short-term and midterm outcome scores of patients after single-level lumbar discectomy. METHODS A monocentric, randomized controlled trial of 54 consecutive patients who underwent single-level lumbar discectomy at the authors’ institution was performed from September 2014 to August 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to use or not use a lumbar corset in the upright position. Patients with previous interventions for disc herniation or with concomitant canal or foraminal stenosis were excluded. The visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire were used to compare groups at the 1- and 6-month follow-up time points. RESULTS No significant differences between the 2 groups were reported at either time point for any given outcome irrespective of the scale used. CONCLUSIONS Corset adoption does not improve the short-term and midterm outcomes of patients after single-level lumbar discectomy.

Margaret McCartney: When can I get back to running after my operation?

Article

Oct 2017

Margaret Mccartney

Nucleoplasty: Percutaneous Plasma Disc Decompression for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Article

Full-text available

Jan 2017

Clinic-based training in comparison to home-based training after first-time lumbar disc surgery: A randomised controlled trial

Article

Full-text available

Dec 2008
EUR SPINE J

The effectiveness of physiotherapy after first-time lumbar disc surgery is still largely unknown. Studies in this field are heterogeneous and behavioural treatment principles have only been evaluated in one earlier study. The aim of this randomised study was to compare clinic-based physiotherapy with a behavioural approach to a home-based training programme regarding back disability, activity level, behavioural aspects, pain and global health measures. A total of 59 lumbar disc patients without any previous spine surgery or comorbidity participated in the study. Clinic-based physiotherapy with a behavioural approach was compared to home-based training 3 and 12 months after surgery. Additionally, the home training group was followed up 3 months after surgery by a structured telephone interview evaluating adherence to the exercise programme. Outcome measures were: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), physical activity level, kinesiophobia, coping, pain, quality of life and patient satisfaction. Treatment compliance was high in both groups. There were no differences between the two groups regarding back pain disability measured by ODI 3 and 12 months after surgery. However, back pain reduction and increase in quality of life were significantly higher in the home-based training group. The patients in the clinic-based training group had significantly higher activity levels 12 months after surgery and were significantly more satisfied with physiotherapy care 3 months after surgery compared to the home-based training group. Rehabilitation after first-time lumbar disc surgery can be based on home training as long as the patients receive both careful instructions from a physiotherapist and strategies for active pain coping, and have access to the physiotherapist if questions regarding training arise. This might be a convenient treatment arrangement for most patients.

Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine

Article

Full-text available

Nov 2008
BMC HEALTH SERV RES

During the recent years improved operation techniques and administrative procedures have been developed for early rehabilitation. At the same time preoperative lifestyle intervention (prehabilitation) has revealed a large potential for additional risk reduction. The aim was to assess the quality of life and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of standard care versus an integrated programme including prehabilitation and early rehabilitation. The analyses were based on the results from 60 patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar disease; 28 patients were randomised to the integrated programme and 32 to the standard care programme. Data on cost and health related quality of life was collected preoperatively, during hospitalisation and postoperatively. The cost was estimated from multiplication of the resource consumption and price per unit. Overall there was no difference in health related quality of life scores. The patients from the integrated programme obtained their postoperative milestones sooner, returned to work and soaked less primary care after discharge. The integrated programme was 1,625 euros (direct costs 494 euros + indirect costs 1,131 euros) less costly per patient compared to the standard care programme. The integrated programme of prehabilitation and early rehabilitation in spine surgery is more cost-effective compared to standard care programme alone.

A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands

Article

Full-text available

Sep 1995

In this study we estimated the costs of back pain to society in The Netherlands in 1991 to be 1.7% of the GNP. The results also show that musculoskeletal diseases are the fifth most expensive disease category regarding hospital care, and the most expensive regarding work absenteeism and disablement. One-third of the hospital care costs and one-half of the costs of absenteeism and disablement due to musculoskeletal disease were due to back pain. The total direct medical costs of back pain were estimated at US$367.6 million. The total costs of hospital care due to back pain constituted the largest part of the direct medical costs and were estimated at US$200 million. The mean costs of hospital care for back pain per case were US$3856 for an inpatient and US$199 for an outpatient. The total indirect costs of back pain for the entire labour force in The Netherlands in 1991 were estimated at US$4.6 billion; US$3.1 billion was due to absenteeism and US$1.5 billion to disablement. The mean costs per case of absenteeism and disablement due to back pain were US$4622 and US$9493, respectively. The indirect costs constituted 93% of the total costs of back pain, the direct medical costs contributed only 7%. It is therefore concluded that back pain is not only a major medical problem but also a major economical problem.

Early active rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective, randomized study of psychometric assessment in 50 patients

Article

Full-text available

Nov 2001
Acta Orthop Scand

In a randomized study, using psychometric assessment, we evaluated two training programs before and after surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. 26 patients were treated according to an early active training program (treatment group). 24 patients followed a traditional less active training program (control group). Before surgery, the patients filled in the following questionnaires 3 and 12 months after surgery: Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Beck Depression Inventory. Pain was assessed by the patient's pain drawing and a visual analog scale. Both groups improved as regards pain severity and state of anxiety. The MPI parameter, pain interference, improved more in the early active treatment group than in the control group. This suggests that the early active training program has a positive effect on the way patients cope with pain in their daily lives.

Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group

Article

Full-text available

Jul 2003
SPINE

Descriptive method guidelines. To help reviewers design, conduct, and report reviews of trials in the field of back and neck pain. In 1997, the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group published method guidelines for systematic reviews. Since its publication, new methodologic evidence emerged and more experience was acquired in conducting reviews. All reviews and protocols of the Back Review Group were assessed for compliance with the 1997 method guidelines. Also, the most recent version of the Cochrane Handbook (4.1) was checked for new recommendations. In addition, some important topics that were not addressed in the 1997 method guidelines were included (e.g., methods for qualitative analysis, reporting of conclusions, and discussion of clinical relevance of the results). In May 2002, preliminary results were presented and discussed in a workshop. In two rounds, a list of all possible recommendations and the final draft were circulated for comments among the editors of the Back Review Group. The recommendations are divided in five categories: literature search, inclusion criteria, methodologic quality assessment, data extraction, and data analysis. Each recommendation is classified in minimum criteria and further guidance. Additional recommendations are included regarding assessment of clinical relevance, and reporting of results and conclusions. Systematic reviews need to be conducted as carefully as the trials they report and, to achieve full impact, systematic reviews need to meet high methodologic standards.

Efficacy of dynamic lumbar stabilization exercise in lumbar microdiscectomy

Article

Full-text available

Jul 2003

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of dynamic lumbar stabilization exercises in patients with lumbar microdiscectomy. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Forty-two patients who were diagnosed as having lumbar disc herniation and had been operated on using the microdiscectomy method were divided randomly into 3 groups. Dynamic lumbar stabilization exercises were set for the first group and a home exercise programme for the second. The third group given no exercises was considered as a control group. All patients were examined twice, once before the exercise programme and once 8 weeks later. Improvement in the first group was highly significant after the treatment (p < 0.0001). The second group improved significantly more in some parameters (pain, functional disability, lumbar Schober, progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation (neck), trunk endurance (flexion-extension)) than did the third group. The third group of patients showed some improvement in fingertip-floor distance, functional disability, modified lumbar Schober and left rotation in 8 weeks, but there were no significant improvements in the other parameters. Dynamic lumbar stabilization exercises are an efficient and useful technique in the rehabilitation of patients who have undergone microdiscectomy. They relieve pain, improve functional parameters and strengthen trunk, abdominal and low back muscles.

Effectiveness of behavioral graded activity after first-time lumbar disc surgery: Short term results of a randomized controlled trial

Article

Full-text available

Jan 2004

Behavioral approaches to treating patients following lumbar disc surgery are becoming increasingly popular. The treatment method is based on the assumption that pain and pain disability are not only influenced by somatic pathology, if found, but also by psychological and social factors. A recent study highlighted the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral interventions, as compared to no treatment, for chronic low back patients. However, to the authors' knowledge, there is no randomized controlled trial that evaluates a behavioral program for patients following lumbar disc surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a behavioral graded activity (BGA) program compared to usual care (UC) in physiotherapy following first-time lumbar disc surgery. The BGA program was a patient-tailored intervention based upon operant therapy. The essence of the BGA is to teach patients that it is safe to increase activity levels. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. Assessments were carried out before and after treatment by an observer blinded to treatment allocation. Patients suffering residual symptoms restricting their activities of daily living and/or work at the 6 weeks post-surgery consultation by the neurosurgeon were included. The exclusion criteria were: complications during surgery, any relevant underlying pathology, and any contraindication to physiotherapy or the BGA program. Primary outcome measures were the patient's Global Perceived Effect and the functional status. Secondary measures were: fear of movement, viewing pain as extremely threatening, pain, severity of the main complaint, range of motion, and relapses. Physiotherapists in the BGA group received proper training. Between November 1997 and December 1999, 105 patients were randomized; 53 into the UC group and 52 into the BGA group. The unadjusted analysis shows a 19.3% (95% CI: 0.1 to 38.5) statistically significant difference to the advantage of the UC group on Global Perceived Effect. This result, however, is not robust, as the adjusted analyses reveal a difference of 15.7% (95% CI: -3.9 to 35.2), which is not statistically significant. For all other outcome measures there were no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences between the two intervention groups. In general, the physiotherapists' compliance with the BGA program was satisfactory, although not all treatments, either in the BGA or the UC group, were delivered exactly as planned, resulting in less contrast between the two interventions than had been planned for. There was one re-operation in each group. The BGA program was not more effective than UC in patients following first-time lumbar disc surgery. For Global Perceived Effect there was a borderline statistically significant difference to the advantage of the UC group. On functional status and all other outcome measures there were no relevant differences between interventions. The number of re-operations was negligible, indicating that it is safe to exercise after first-time disc surgery.

Behavioral Graded Activity Following First-Time Lumbar Disc Surgery

Article

Full-text available

Sep 2003
SPINE

In a randomized clinical trial, the effectiveness of behavioral graded activity was assessed as compared to usual care provided by physiotherapists for patients after first-time lumbar disc surgery (n = 105). Little is known about the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs following lumbar disc surgery. Most programs focus on biomechanical aspects, whereas psychosocial factors are hardly addressed. The aim of the behavioral graded activity program, which is an operant treatment, is to alter psycho-social factors such as fear of movement and pain catastrophizing, which might subsequently lead to improved functional status and higher rates of recovery. Behavioral treatments for patients following lumbar disc surgery have not yet been assessed in a randomized clinical trial. Inclusion criteria: age between 18 and 65 years; first-time lumbar disc surgery; restrictions in normal activities of daily living. Exclusion criteria: surgical complications and confirmed and relevant underlying diseases. Outcome assessment took place at 6 and 12 months after randomization. Six months after randomization, 62% of the patients had recovered following usual care versus 65% of the patients following behavioral graded activity. After 12 months, 73% and 75%, respectively, had recovered. Differences between intervention groups, 3% and 2% respectively, after 6 and 12 months are not statistically significant. Furthermore, there were no differences between the two groups regarding functional status, pain, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, range of motion, general health, social functioning or return to work. After 1 year, 4 of the behavioral graded activity cases had undergone another operation versus 2 of usual care cases. Both fear of movement and pain catastrophizing seem to be unaffected by either treatment in these patients. It is concluded that treatment principles derived from theories within the field of chronic low back pain might not apply to these patients. After 1 year of follow-up, there were no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences between the behavioral graded activity program and usual care as provided by physiotherapists for patients following first-time lumbar disc surgery.

Effects of Home Strength Training and Stretching Versus Stretching Alone After Lumbar Disk Surgery: A Randomized Study With a 1-Year Follow-Up

Article

Full-text available

Jun 2005
ARCH PHYS MED REHAB

To assess the adherence to and effects of a 12-month combined strength and stretching home exercise regimen versus stretching alone, on patient outcome after lumbar disk surgery. Randomized controlled trial. Departments of physical medicine and rehabilitation and orthopedics at a Finnish hospital. Patients (N=126) were randomized into either a combined strength training and stretching group (STG, n=65) or a control group (CG, n=61). The STG was instructed to perform strength training and both the STG and CG were instructed in the same stretching and stabilization exercises for 12 months. Pain on the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry and the Million disability indexes, isometric and dynamic trunk muscle strength, mobility in the lumbar spine, and straight-leg raising were measured. The trial was completed by 71% and 77% of the patients from the STG and the CG, respectively. The mean strength training frequency decreased from 1.5 to 0.6 times a week in the STG during the intervention. The mean stretching frequency decreased from 3.7 to 1.6 times a week in both groups. Median back and leg pain varied between 17 and 23 mm (VAS), and the Million and Oswestry indices varied between 14 and 23 points 2 months postoperatively. No statistically significant changes took place in these outcome measures during the 12-month follow-up in both groups. The changes in isometric trunk extension favored the STG ( P =.016) during the first 2 months. However, during the whole 12-month training period, both dynamic and isometric back extension and flexion strength, as well as mobility of the spine and repetitive squat-test results, improved significantly in both groups, and no differences were found in any of the physical function parameters between the STG and CG. At the 12-month follow-up, no statistically significant changes were found in the physical function, pain, or disability measures between the groups. In the STG, training adherence with regard to training frequency and intensity remained too low to lead to specific training-induced adaptations in the neuromuscular system. Progressive loading, supervision of training, and psychosocial support is needed in long-term rehabilitation programs to maintain patient motivation.

Early neuromuscular customized training after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective controlled study

Article

Full-text available

Feb 2007

A prospective and controlled study of training after surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The objective was to determine the effect of early neuromuscular customized training after LDH surgery. No consensus exists on the type and timing of physical rehabilitation after LDH surgery. Patients aged 15-50 years, disc prolapse at L4-L5 or L5-S1. Before surgery, at 6 weeks, 4, and 12 months postoperatively, the following evaluations were performed: low back pain and leg pain estimated on a visual analog scale, disability according to the Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ) and disability rating index (DRI). Clinical examination, including the SLR test, was performed using a single blind method. Consumption of analgesics was registered. Twenty-five patients started neuromuscular customized training 2 weeks after surgery (early training group = ETG). Thirty-one patients formed a control group (CG) and started traditional training after 6 weeks. There was no significant difference in pain and disability between the two training groups before surgery. Median preoperative leg pain was 63 mm in ETG and 70 mm in the CG. Preoperative median disability according to RMQ was 14 in the ETG and 14.5 in the CG. Disability according to DRI (33/56 patients) was 5.3 in the ETG vs. 4.6 in the CG. At 6 weeks, 4 months, and 12 months, pain was significantly reduced in both groups, to the same extent. Disability scores were lower in the ETG at all follow-ups, and after 12 months, the difference was significant (RMQ P=.034, DRI P=.015). The results of the present study show early neuromuscular customized training to have a superior effect on disability, with a significant difference compared to traditional training at a follow-up 12 months after surgery. No adverse effects of the early training were seen. A prospective, randomized study with a larger patient sample is warranted to ultimately demonstrate that early training as described is beneficial for patients undergoing LDH surgery.

Economic Evaluation of a Behavioral-Graded Activity Program Compared to Physical Therapy for Patients Following Lumbar Disc Surgery

Article

Full-text available

Apr 2004
SPINE

An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial. Little is known about the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment options for patients following lumbar disc surgery. If the knowledge available was supported by an economic evaluation, the information could then be used to make recommendations for the implementation of cognitive-behavioral treatment in the routine of rehabilitation following lumbar disc surgery. To examine the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral-graded activity program, which is an operant treatment, compared to usual care as delivered by a physical therapist for patients following first-time lumbar disc surgery. For the economic evaluation, a societal viewpoint was applied. The primary outcome measures (measured at the 12-month follow-up) were global perceived effect and functional status. To evaluate the economic consequences of the treatments, direct health care and non-health care costs were considered, as well as indirect costs. The clinical outcomes showed no relevant differences between behavioral-graded activity (n = 52) and UC (n = 53). Treatment costs were almost identical in the two intervention groups. The difference in direct health care costs was, although not statistically significant, 264 EURO [95% CI: -3-525] higher in behavioral-graded activity than in usual care per patient-year. It was mainly the excess cost of visiting the physiotherapist in the behavioral-graded activity group that accounted for this difference. The difference in direct non-health care costs, although not statistically significant, was 388 EURO [95% CI: -217; 992] lower in the usual care group due to unpaid help by friends or family. Consequently, although again not statistically significant, the total direct costs in behavioral-graded activity are 639 EURO [95% CI: -91; 1368] higher than in usual care. For the indirect costs, there was a statistically significant difference, behavioral-graded activity being more expensive. The sensitivity analysis showed that these results are fairly robust. This study concludes that there are no differences between the two treatment conditions on any of the clinical outcome measures but that behavioral-graded activity is associated with higher costs. Consequently, there is no reason for the implementation of behavioral-graded activity as the standard treatment for patients following lumbar disc surgery.

Surgery versus Prolonged Conservative Treatment for Sciatica

Article

Full-text available

May 2007
NEW ENGL J MED

Lumbar-disk surgery often is performed in patients who have sciatica that does not resolve within 6 weeks, but the optimal timing of surgery is not known. We randomly assigned 283 patients who had had severe sciatica for 6 to 12 weeks to early surgery or to prolonged conservative treatment with surgery if needed. The primary outcomes were the score on the Roland Disability Questionnaire, the score on the visual-analogue scale for leg pain, and the patient's report of perceived recovery during the first year after randomization. Repeated-measures analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle was used to estimate the outcome curves for both groups. Of 141 patients assigned to undergo early surgery, 125 (89%) underwent microdiskectomy after a mean of 2.2 weeks. Of 142 patients designated for conservative treatment, 55 (39%) were treated surgically after a mean of 18.7 weeks. There was no significant overall difference in disability scores during the first year (P=0.13). Relief of leg pain was faster for patients assigned to early surgery (P<0.001). Patients assigned to early surgery also reported a faster rate of perceived recovery (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 2.22; P<0.001). In both groups, however, the probability of perceived recovery after 1 year of follow-up was 95%. The 1-year outcomes were similar for patients assigned to early surgery and those assigned to conservative treatment with eventual surgery if needed, but the rates of pain relief and of perceived recovery were faster for those assigned to early surgery. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN26872154 [controlled-trials.com].).

A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine

Article

Full-text available

Aug 2007

Spinal decompression is the most common type of spinal surgery carried out in the older patient, and is being performed with increasing frequency. Physiotherapy (rehabilitation) is often prescribed after surgery, although its benefits compared with no formal rehabilitation have yet to be demonstrated in randomised control trials. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to examine the effects on outcome up to 2 years after spinal decompression surgery of two types of postoperative physiotherapy compared with no postoperative therapy (self-management). Hundred and fifty-nine patients (100 men, 59 women; 65 +/- 11 years) undergoing decompression surgery for spinal stenosis/herniated disc were randomised to one of the following programmes beginning 2 months post-op: recommended to "keep active" (CONTROL; n = 54); physiotherapy, spine stabilisation exercises (PT-StabEx; n = 56); physiotherapy, mixed techniques (PT-Mixed; n = 49). Both PT programmes involved 2 x 30 min sessions/week for up to 12 weeks, with home exercises. Pain intensity (0-10 graphic rating scale, for back and leg pain separately) and self-rated disability (Roland Morris) were assessed before surgery, before and after the rehabilitation phase (approx. 2 and 5 months post-op), and at 12 and 24 months after the operation. 'Intention to treat' analyses were used. At 24 months, 151 patients returned questionnaires (effective return rate, excluding 4 deaths, 97%). Significant reductions in leg and back pain and self-rated disability were recorded after surgery (P < 0.05). Pain showed no further changes in any group up to 24 months later, whereas disability declined further during the "rehabilitation" phase (P < 0.05) then stabilised, but with no significant group differences. 12 weeks of post-operative physiotherapy did not influence the course of change in pain or disability up to 24 months after decompression surgery. Advising patients to keep active by carrying out the type of physical activities that they most enjoy appears to be just as good as administering a supervised rehabilitation program, and at no cost to the health-care provider.

Die Orthopädische Hippotherapie in der postoperativen Rehabilitation von lumbalen Bandscheibenpatienten

Article

Jun 1997

In a prospectively randomized therapy study the influence of a new therapeutical approach, called “Orthopedic Horseback-Riding-Therapy (OHRT)”, was evaluated on the postoperative rehabilitation after lumbal discectomie in 16 patients against an identical numbered control group. In comparison with the reference group the utilization of OHRT not only produced an improvement in the patients' self evaluation of their postoperative condition (McNab Score). Also a significant reduction of postoperative work disablement could be achieved. Compared with the reference group influences of previously detected negative psychic predictors (Hs and Hy scales of MMPI) could be reduced. Thus the OHRT is a serious therapy concept in postoperative treatment of patients with lumbal disc herniation.

Clinical benefit of intensive dynamic exercises for low back pain

Article

Mar 1996
SCAND J MED SCI SPOR

Over the years there has been an apparent contradiction between the widely utilized treatment of low back pain through exercise, and the often apparently disappointing results reported in the scientific literature. Recently published studies have shown that the most important factor regarding the training effects of chronic low back patients is the administration of a high training stimulus (number of repetitions of the exercise, exercise resistance, and the total number of sessions). This would explain why several of the previously published studies regarding training show insignificant results. Simply stated, in many low-dosage or short-time studies, the positive effects of training have not had adequate opportunity to take hold in the chronic low back pain patient. The patient group which has been operated on for disc prolapse often exhibits considerable functional deteriorations post-operatively. Rehabilitation studies have shown that many of these patients also benefit from post-operative rehabilitation including high dosage exercise programs. Exercise programs are generally free of side-effects.

The Effect of Straight Leg Raise Exercises after Lumbar Decompression Surgery — A Pilot Study

Article

Feb 1996
PHYSIOTHERAPY

Christine Kitteringham

SummaryThe purpose of this study was to examine the possible benefits of auto-assisted straight leg raise (SLR) exercises to patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery. A group comparison study comparing a maintenance treatment group with an optimum treatment group was carried out on 12 patients. The SLR exercises were performed by means of a rope and pulley system positioned above the bed. Pain, SLR and disability were assessed during a six-week post-operative period. Results were inconclusive as to whether frequent SLR exercises improved recovery in the short term, but there was some evidence of a relationship between the different outcome measures.

Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods

Article

Jun 1992

Ninety-two patients who had undergone a primary excision of a lumbar disc were evaluated using 15 different criteria that evaluate the surgical outcome 2-15.5 years (average 8.8 years) following operation. The satisfactory results ranged from 62% to 84%. Criteria which relied on the subjective opinion of the patient gave the best results, while on the contrary the worst results were those that relied on functional criteria, such as return to work, return to previous employment, general activity level and need of further treatment. This variability in results observed with the same group of patients depends to a great extent on the nature of criteria used as well as on the design of those criteria. The study concludes that the reported outcomes for lumbar spinal surgery are influenced by the selection of the criteria used for the assessment of the end results.

Epidural Steroid Following Discectomy for Herniated Lumbar Disc Reduces Neurological Impairment and Enhances Recovery

Article

Oct 2008
SPINE

We randomized 200 patients after lumbar discectomy to receive epidural steroid or none with a 2-year follow-up. To evaluate the outcome, neurologic impairment and safety of epidural steroid following lumbar discectomy for herniated disc disease. Convalescence after discectomy for herniated disc disease is dependent on pain and the inflammatory response. Previous studies in arthroscopic and abdominal surgery demonstrate steroids, which reduce the inflammatory response and enhance recovery. Here we report a 2-year follow-up of a randomized trial of epidural steroid following lumbar discectomy. Through 2001 and 2003 200 patients undergoing discectomy for herniated disc disease were randomly allocated to receive epidural methylprednisolone 40 mg or none. In the control group (62 males and 38 females, median age 41 years, 18-66) 48 L5, 50 L4, and 6 L3 discectomies were performed and in the intervention group (60 males and 40 females, median age 45 years, 15-53) 56 L5, 46 L4, and 3 L3 discectomies. Contemporary with randomization to epidural steroid or none both groups received preoperative prophylactic antibiotics and the same multimodal pain treatment. Hospital stay was reduced from 8 to 6 days (P = 0.0001) and the number of patients with neurologic signs were reduced more (70% vs. 44%, P = 0.0004) by epidural steroid. Incidence of reoperation at 1 year was 6% in both groups and 8% in the control group and 7% in the intervention group after 2 years. No infections were registered. Epidural methylprednisolone enhances recovery after discectomy for herniated disc disease without apparent side effects.

A New Design for Randomized Clinical Trials

Article

Jun 1979

Marvin Zelen

This paper proposes a new method for planning randomized clinical trials. This method is especially suited to comparison of a best standard or control treatment with an experimental treatment. Patients are allocated into two groups by a random or chance mechanism. Patients in the first group receive standard treatment; those in the second group are asked if they will accept the experimental therapy; if they decline, they receive the best standard treatment. In the analyses of results, all those in the second group, regardless of treatment, are compared with those in the first group. Any loss of statistical efficiency can be overcome by increased numbers. This experimental plan is indeed a randomized clinical trial and has the advantage that, before providing consent, a patient will know whether an experimental treatment is to be used.

Epidural steroids, postoperative morbidity, and recovery in patients undergoing microsurgical lumbar discectomy

Article

Aug 1992
J NEUROSURG

Intraoperative epidural corticosteroids have been used by some surgeons to decrease pain following surgery for a herniated lumbar disc. In this study, 84 consecutively treated, comparable patients with unilateral lumbar disc herniation were prospectively assigned randomly to receive either epidural corticosteroids (40 mg methylprednisolone acetate) or saline at the conclusion of the operative procedure. The postoperative morbidity of these two groups was evaluated by tabulating the following parameters: pain relief as measured by consumption of postoperative pain medications; the length of hospital stay; postoperative functional status; and the time interval from surgery until return to work. The mean postoperative analgesic medications consumed was 12.2 +/- 1.9 mg of morphine equivalents in the corticosteroid group versus 12.2 +/- 1.8 mg of morphine equivalents in the control group. The mean hospital stay was less than 2 days in each group, and the mean interval until return to work was 21.2 +/- 2.7 days in the corticosteroid group versus 25.4 +/- 3.1 days in the control group. Moreover, no statistically significant difference was measured between the steroid-treated and control groups when the data were stratified for sex, age, and site of disc herniation. The mean outcome scores, which are derived from a postoperative assessment of pain relief resulting from surgery, functional status, and interval until return to work, were identical in the corticosteroid and control groups. This study concludes that epidural corticosteroid administration after microsurgical lumbar discectomy for unilateral disc herniation does not lessen postoperative morbidity or improve functional recovery.

Rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: Results of a randomized clinical trial

Article

Feb 1986
INT J REHABIL RES

The aim of this prospective study was to examine the one-year postoperative results in patients operated on for lumbar disc herniation randomized in two groups: one with comprehensive rehabilitation and the other taken care of by normal care facilities. A total of 212 patients without any previous spinal operations comprised the final study group. The physiatrist, the surgeon, the social worker, and the psychologist performed the handicap evaluation according to the occupation handicap scales of the WHO. The handicap was evaluated for two phases: before the onset of acute sciatica leading to operation and one year after operation. No significant differences in handicap distribution between the intervention and normal care groups were seen. The postoperative handicap correlated highly significantly with preoperative handicap for both groups. More than half (57%) of all the patients returned to work within two months of the operation. The amount of sick leaves did not differ significantly between the intervention and normal care groups. A total of 15 persons (7%) retired during the postoperative year.

A Randomized-Control Study of Active and Passive Treatments for Chronic Low Back Pain Following L5 Laminectomy

Article

Jan 1995

Kent E. Timm

The professional literature contains relatively few randomized-control studies that have assessed the efficacy of physical therapy approaches to the management of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The purposes of this study were: 1) to investigate the effects of physical agents, joint manipulation, low-tech exercise, and high-tech exercise on objective measures of CLBP; 2) to track the length of CLBP relief; and 3) to determine treatment cost-effectiveness. Two-hundred-fifty subjects (68 females, 182 males; ages 34-51 years) with CLBP following an L5 laminectomy were randomly assigned into five separate groups for a treatment period of 8 weeks. Chronic low back pain status was measured by modified-modified Schober, Cybex Liftask, and Oswestry procedures. Results revealed that: 1) only low-tech and high-tech exercise produced significant improvements (p < .05) in CLBP, 2) the mean period of CLBP relief ranged from 1.6 weeks (control) to 91.4 weeks (low-tech exercise), and 3) low-tech exercise was most cost-effective. It was concluded that: 1) low-tech and high-tech exercise were the only effective treatments for CLBP, 2) low-tech exercise produced the longest period of CLBP relief, and 3) low-tech exercise was the most cost-effective form of treatment. Clinically, low-tech exercise may be the treatment method of choice for the effective management of chronic low back pain.

Supervised endurance exercise training compared to home training after first lumbar diskectomy: A clinical trial

Article

Nov 1994

We performed a randomised trial to evaluate if intensive supervised training of the back should be offered to all patients after a first lumbar diskectomy. Forty consecutive patients were, after a first lumbar diskectomy, randomly allocated to 2 groups undergoing "supervised training" twice a week for 3 months in an outpatient clinic or "home training" after 2 hours of instruction. The two rehabilitation models both showed a significant effect on spinal mobility, isokinetic trunk flexion strength, isokinetic trunk extension strength and daily function. These improvements were unchanged at follow up 3 months later. The pain score remained unchanged, however, throughout the trial in both groups. No differences in effect between the two rehabilitation models could be found for any of the assessed parameters. Thirteen patients did not complete the trial, including 9 from the supervised endurance trained group, mainly because of increased pain and reprolaps (n = 4). Four patients dropped out of the home trained group, only one because of increased pain. The differences in drop-out rate and training side effects were, however, not statistically significant. We conclude that it is not worthwhile to implement 3 months of supervised intensive endurance training as opposed to home training in all cases of first lumbar diskectomy, although a beneficial effect and better compliance might be found for a selected group of such patients.

Return to work/work retention outcomes of a functional restoration program: A multi-center, prospective study with a comparison group

Article

Oct 1994

This was a study of a standardized functional restoration program that included 11 centers in seven states, involving 303 patients in the treatment group and 94 patients in the comparison group. To illustrate the positive effect a functional restoration program has on return to work rates and work retention regardless of previous surgical intervention. Data were obtained from the initial and discharge evaluations as well as at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Patients received a standardized work capacity assessment upon entrance and were recommended to the program if they adhered to specific entrance criteria. Treatment patients received the same evaluation at discharge. Significant improvement in functional abilities, actual return to work, and work retention were noted in the treatment group regardless of treatment intervention. This study demonstrated improved return to work rates and work retention with surgical and nonsurgical patients after their participation in a functional restoration program.

An International Comparison of Back Surgery Rates

Article

Jul 1994

Although high geographic variation in back surgery rates within the United States have been documented, international comparisons have not been published. The authors compared rates of back surgery in eleven developed countries to determine if back surgery rates are higher: 1) in the United States than in other developed countries, 2) in countries with more neurologic and orthopaedic surgeons per capita, and 3) in countries with higher rates of other surgical procedures. Data on back surgery rates and physician supply were obtained from health agencies within these eleven countries. Country-specific rates of other surgical procedures were available from published sources. The rate of back surgery in the United States was at least 40% higher than in any other country and was more than five times those in England and Scotland. Back surgery rates increased almost linearly with the per capita supply of orthopaedic and neurosurgeons in the country. Countries with high back surgery rates also had high rates of other discretionary procedures such as tonsillectomy and hysterectomy. These findings illustrate the potentially large impact of health system differences on rates of back surgery. Better outcome studies, however, are needed to determine whether Americans are being subjected to excessive surgery or if those in other developed countries are suffering because back surgery is underutilized.

The Effects of Aerobic Exercise After Lumbar Microdiscectomy

Article

May 1994

This study determined whether lumbar discectomy patients could endure an aerobic exercise program sufficient to achieve a training effect, and whether any functional advantages were derived. Trained volunteers (n = 19) were compared with untrained control subjects (n = 18) after a 12-week aerobic and rehabilitation exercise program. Subjects completed a maximal graded exercise test, a hydrostatic weighing test, and a battery of self-report inventories. Using a discriminant analysis, as a post hoc test, maximal oxygen consumption was found to be the factor responsible for the difference between the groups (P < 0.006). Oxygen consumption was more than three times as important as any other single variable in differentiating between the groups.

Clinical Trial of Postoperative Dynamic Back Exercises After First Lumbar Discectomy

Article

Feb 1993

Ninety-six patients who had undergone first-time discectomy for herniated lumbar intervertebral discs were consecutively randomized to two physical rehabilitation programs: a program of high-intensity, dynamic back extension and abdominal exercises with occurrence of low back pain being the limiting factor or a traditional program of mild, generally mobility-improving exercises within pain limits. Both groups underwent 14 hours of treatment during a 6-week period 5 weeks after surgery. At 26 weeks' follow-up, results indicated that patients who did the high-intensity exercises experienced greater success with regard to the patient disability-index and work capabilities. After 1 year, a trend that favored the use of intensive exercises could be observed. No differences were found in pain or objective measurements. A rehabilitation program of intensive exercises with occurrence of back pain being the limiting factor appears to increase patient behavioral support, resulting in work capacity improvements and patient self-rated disability levels. The results indicate that a 6-wk, 14-hr postoperative rehabilitation program is inadequate if objective postoperative deficit improvements are the desired goal.

Intensive Dynamic Back Exercises With or Without Hyperextension in Chronic Back Pain After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Protrusion

Article

May 1993

Sixty-two patients with chronic low back pain occurring 14-60 months after undergoing discectomy for the first time were randomized to two physical treatment groups: 24 sessions of intensive dynamic back exercises with hyperextension or 24 sessions of intensive dynamic back exercises without hyperextension. At the conclusion of therapy and at one-year follow-up, no difference was seen between the randomized groups, with regard to the combined assessments of pain, disability and objective measurements. A difference for back exercises without hyperextension to be superior to the other treatment regimen was statistically significant at the three-month follow-up. In the patient's qualitative assessment of treatment outcome there were seen no significant differences between back exercises with or without hyperextension. There was a similar and significant improvement of the isometric endurance of back muscles in both groups, but the flexibility of the spine was significantly improved only in the group using hyperextension exercises. The overall response rate of an earlier published investigation was reproduced. It is concluded that chronic back patients after first time discectomy may benefit from an intensive rehabilitation protocol including intensive exercises. The added use of hyperextension exercises does not confer any independent benefit. Furthermore, the training had to continue for more than 2-3 months before a statistical significant decrease in back pain was reported in the patient pain diary.

Assessment and exercise in low back pain. With special reference to the management of pain and disability following first time lumbar disc surgery

Article

Oct 1995
DAN MED BULL

Claus Manniche

Eight articles including 555 low back pain patients have been published. They included the following topics: 1) A ratio interval rating scale (Low Back Pain Rating Scale (RS)) was introduced. The possibility of registering the actual status in low back pain patients including; Back Pain, Sciatica, Functional Disability and Physical Impairment was studied. Methods of evaluating index-scales developed in the field of psychometry were applied in the validation process of RS. RS was found to be both valid and user friendly. 2) Using Low Back Pain Rating Scale the general outcome following first-time lumbar disc surgery was analysed through a survey. The results showed that more than half of the patients still suffered from considerable Back Pain, Sciatica, and Functional Disabilities. Approximately 25% of the patients risked reduced work capabilities, and many receive pensions. 3) By means of a comprehensive statistical analysis of 18 studied preoperative demographic and physical findings, sex, hypoalgesia, smoking and Finneson-index were found to have prognostic value. 4) Attempts at influencing the results obtained from lumbar disc surgery have been tested in 3 randomized trials, including back training and peroperative glucocorticoid administration. 5) Three randomized trials including patients suffering from chronic low back pain (with or without previous lumbar disc surgery) attempted to convey which elements of a training programme provide patients with the greatest effect and the least risk of side-effects. It was concluded that Low Back Pain Rating Scale is a useable assessment instrument in both clinical trials and as a daily quality control instrument of back patients. There is a need of increased patient scrutiny in patient selection prior to lumbar disc surgery. Postoperative rehabilitation should include intensive back training, which has been shown to be of value in behavioural support and restoration of functional deficits. This has resulted in increased work capacities for disc operated patients. The exercise programmes are generally free of side-effects. As regards chronic back pain patients with or without previous lumbar surgery, high dosage exercises with training periods lasting at least 12 to 16 sessions are of crucial importance for success. Exercises should be dynamic and full-range, and carried out following the adage "Don't let the pain be your guide.

Are Postoperative Activity Restrictions Necessary After Posterior Lumbar Discectomy?: A Prospective Study of Outcomes in 50 Consecutive Cases

Article

Sep 1996

A prospective clinical trial was conducted. To determine if removing activity restrictions after surgery and encouraging early return to work would affect clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy. Current practice usually recommends several weeks to months of restricted activities after lumbar discectomy. No formal studies have been done to determine the optimal period of restriction, if any, after surgery. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing limited open discectomy for herniated lumbar intervertebral disc were prospectively treated with no restrictions at all after surgery and were urged to return to full activities as soon as possible. The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. At follow-up evaluation, an independent examiner evaluated each patient. The mean time from surgery to return to work was 1,7 weeks. Eleven of 44 (25%) patients returned to work on the next work day. Ninety-seven percent of patients who were working before surgery returned to their previous work. Forty-three of 44 (97%) patients had returned to full duty by 8 weeks after surgery. At follow-up evaluation (3.8 years), five patients had changed work; three patients increased their work level, and two decreased their work level. No patient changed employment because of back or leg pain. There were three reherniations at the operative level (6%), all occurring more than 1 year after surgery. One patient required reoperation. Back and leg pain scores at follow-up evaluation were very low. Lifting of postoperative restrictions after limited discectomy allowed shortened sick leave without increased complications. Postoperative precautions in these patients may not be necessary.

Orthopedic hippotherapy in postoperative rehabilitation of lumbar intervertebral disk patients. A prospective, randomized therapy study].

Article

Jul 1997

In a prospectively randomized therapy study the influence of a new therapeutical approach, called "Orthopedic Horseback-Riding-Therapy (OHRT)", was evaluated on the postoperative rehabilitation after lumbal discectomie in 16 patients against an identical numbered control group. In comparison with the reference group the utilization of OHRT not only produced an improvement in the patients' self evaluation of their postoperative condition (McNab Score). Also a significant reduction of postoperative work disablement could be achieved. Compared with the reference group influences of previously detected negative psychic predictors (Hs and Hy scales of MMPI) could be reduced. Thus the OHRT is a serious therapy concept in postoperative treatment of patients with lumbal disc herniation.

A 10-Year Follow-Up of the Outcome of Lumbar Microdiscectomy

Article

Jun 1998

A retrospective analysis of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy, with independent assessment of outcome. To explore whether the initial positive outcome after microdiscectomy is maintained at long-term follow-up. Previous reports on long-term outcome after lumbar disc surgery give conflicting messages about whether an initially positive surgical outcome is maintained throughout a 10-year period. This is partly due to differing methods and the failure to include initial outcome, thereby permitting assessment of possible deterioration in the quality of outcome. This study presents the initial and long-term outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy, with an independent assessment of outcome. Eighty-eight consecutive patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy were identified. Assessment at 10 years after surgery was obtained in 79 (90%) of the cases. The initial outcome was assessed retrospectively by an independent observer at 6 months after surgery using the Macnab classification. The final outcome Macnab classification was completed by postal questionnaire by the patients themselves, who also completed a modified Roland-Morris disability questionnaire. A successful outcome at 6 months was achieved in 91% of the cases. At 10-year follow-up, this result declined slightly to an 83% success rate. However, there was no statistically significant difference between these outcome results. The long-term Macnab classification results correlated well with disability, as measured by the Roland-Morris score. Patient satisfaction with the results of microdiscectomy 10 years later was high. Lumbar microdiscectomy achieves a high level of initial success, and this positive outcome is maintained at a 10-year follow-up.

Early active training after lumbar discectomy. A prospective, randomized, and controlled study

Article

Dec 1998

A prospective, randomized, and controlled study was conducted. To evaluate two training programs, both of which started immediately after lumbar discectomy. In previous studies, patients began physiotherapy between 4 weeks and 60 months after surgery. No studies have been conducted to evaluate a physiotherapy program that begins immediately after surgery. Twenty-six patients were treated according to an early active training program. Twenty-six patients were treated with a traditional, less active training program (control group). All patients were examined immediately before and after surgery and 3, 6, 12, and 52 weeks after surgery by an unbiased observer. Two years after surgery, patients completed a questionnaire. Range of motion of the lumbar spine and straight leg raising were measured. pain intensity and location was measured by a visual analog scale. The duration of sick leave was documented. Six and 12 weeks after surgery, patients with dominating residual leg pain had significantly less intense pain in the early active training group than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Twelve weeks after surgery, range of motion of the lumbar spine was significantly more increased in the early active training group (P < 0.01). One year after surgery, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the duration of sick leave, results in a positive straight leg raising, or pain intensity. Twenty-two (88%) patients in the early active training group and 16 (67%) in the control group were satisfied with the treatment outcome 2 years after surgery (P < 0.10). Patients rehabilitated according to the early active training program had a better short-term outcome of objective values. At 2 years' follow-up, more patients were satisfied with the result of the operation. The early active treatment program is recommended.

Postoperative Pain After Lumbar Disc Surgery: A Comparison Between Parenteral Ketorolac and Narcotics

Article

Feb 1999

Lumbar discectomy is a common elective surgical procedure but many patients still experience postoperative back pain which may delay hospital discharge. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of a parenteral non-steroidal antiinflammatory agent, ketorolac, for the management of post-surgical pain. Fifty three patients undergoing lumbar discectomy at a Medical School affiliated Veterans Administration hospital were randomly assigned to receive either: 1) 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac upon surgical closure and every 6 hours for 36 hours and narcotic analgesics as needed (PRN); or 2) only narcotic analgesics as needed. A blinded observer recorded the average, minimum and maximum postoperative pain intensity using a Numeric Pain Intensity Scale; total postoperative narcotic consumption, complications, length of hospitalization (from surgery to discharge) and outcome at 6 weeks. The patients who received ketorolac reported significantly lower average (p < 0.001), minimum (p < 0.001), and maximum (p < 0.001) pain scores than patients receiving only narcotic analgesics. Cumulative narcotic doses (standardized to parenteral morphine) were significantly lower in the ketorolac group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the frequency of side effects, and no complication specifically associated with ketorolac use was observed. Mean length of hospitalization was significantly shorter (p = 0.05) in patients receiving ketorolac than in patients receiving only narcotics. Six weeks after surgery 5 (19.2%) patients who received only narcotics were troubled by persistent back pain. By contrast, all patients who received ketorolac were free of back pain at follow-up (p = 0.03). These results suggest that ketorolac, when used with PRN narcotics, is more effective than PRN narcotics alone for postoperative pain following lumbar disc surgery. In addition, this strategy also may contribute to early discharge from hospital after lumbar disc surgery.

Return to work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A rehabilitation-oriented approach in insurance medicine

Article

Jun 1999

An intervention study by the medical advisers of a social security sickness fund on a mandatorily insured patient population after open discectomy for herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. The medical advisers were randomized into two groups: a control group (n = 30) and an intervention group (n = 30). To compare a rehabilitation-oriented approach in insurance medicine focused primarily on early mobilization and early resumption of professional activities with the usual claim-based practice. This study included 710 patients, with a mean age of 39.2 years, who underwent surgery for herniated lumbar disc. Medical advisers in the rehabilitation-oriented group examined the patients monthly, starting at 6 weeks after the surgical intervention. They used a newly developed protocol to motivate the patients and treating physicians toward social and professional reintegration. At 52 weeks, 10.1% of the patients guided by medical advisers from the rehabilitation-oriented group had not resumed work in contrast to 18.1% of the patients in the control group. It was statistically proven that this effect also holds during the follow-up period. A rehabilitation-oriented approach by the medical advisers of social security can increase the probability of a return to work for patients after lumbar disc herniation surgery.

Seven- to 20-Year Outcome of Lumbar Discectomy

Article

Dec 1999

A retrospective, follow-up study. To assess the effects of conventional surgery for lumbar disc herniation over an extended period of time and to examine factors that might correlate with unsatisfactory results. Although the short-term results of lumbar discectomy are excellent when there is a proper patient selection, the reported success rates in the long-term follow-up studies vary, and few factors have been implicated for an unsatisfactory outcome. One hundred-nine patients with surgically documented herniated lumbar disc were analyzed, retrospectively, by an independent observer. Long-term follow-up (mean 12.2 years) was done by a mailed, self-report questionnaire that included items about pain relief in the back and leg, satisfaction with the results, need for analgesics, level of activity, working capacity, and reoperations. Subjective disability was measured by the Oswestry questionnaire. Radiographic review was carried out in 66% of patients. End results were assessed using the modified Stauffer-Coventry's evaluating criteria. Several variables were examined to assess their influence to the outcome. The late results were satisfactory in 64% of patients. The mean Oswestry disability score was 18.9. Of the 101 patients who had primary procedures, 28% still complained of significant back or leg pain. Sixty-five percent of patients were very satisfied with their results, 29% satisfied, and 6% dissatisfied. The reoperation rate was 7.3% (8 patients), about one-third of which was due to recurrent disc herniation. Sociodemographic factors predisposing to unsatisfactory outcome, including female gender, low vocational education, and jobs requiring significant physical strenuousness. Disc space narrowing was common at the level of discectomy, but was without prognostic significance. The long-term results of standard lumbar discectomy are not very satisfying. More than one-third of the patients had unsatisfactory results and more than one quarter complained of significant residual pain. Heavy manual work, particularly agricultural work, and low educational level were negative predictors of a good outcome. These indicators should be used preoperatively to identify patients who are at high risk for an unfavorable long-term result.

Early Aggressive Exercise for Postoperative Rehabilitation After Discectomy

Article

May 2000

A randomized clinical trial of postoperative medical exercise therapy in patients after operation for lumbar disc herniation with blind assessment of clinical outcomes. To assess the effect of an early regimen of vigorous medical exercise compared with an ordinary care program. Patients offered an operation for lumbar disc herniation were consecutively randomized to a training group or to a control group. The training consisted of an 8-week active rehabilitation program including a regimen of vigorous lumbar stabilizing exercises. The control subjects participated in a mild program of 2 to 3 back exercises at home, after relaxing and resting their backs for 2 months after the surgery. The outcomes were evaluated 6 and 12 months after the operation. The results are based on intention-to-treat analyses. Sixty-three of 65 eligible patients agreed to participate in the trial. Fifty-eight and 53 patients attended for evaluation at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There was a significantly larger improvement in the mean Roland's disability index (from 8.9 to 5.4 [P = 0.02] at 6 months and from 8. 7 to 5.3 [P = 0.03] at 12 months) and in reported pain (from 3.7 to 2.0 [P = 0.04] at 6 months and from 3.2 to 1.8 [P = 0.09] at 12 months) in the training group. A significantly (P = 0.05) higher proportion of the training group reported that they participated in daily activities as usual. There were more patients in the training group who reported improvement in self-evaluated health after surgery at both 6 (P = 0.02) and at 12 months (P = 0.05). Finally, no differences in clinical end points were observed between the groups. Vigorous medical exercise therapy, started 4 weeks after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, reduced disability and pain after surgery. Because no differences in clinical end points were observed, there is hardly any danger associated with early and vigorous training after operation for disc herniation.

Can Exercise Therapy Improve the Outcome of Microdiscectomy?

Article

Jul 2000

A prospective randomized controlled trial of exercise therapy in patients who underwent microdiscectomy for prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. Results of a pilot study are presented. To determine the effects of a postoperative exercise program on pain, disability, psychological status, and spinal function. Microdiscectomy is often used successfully to treat prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. However, some patients do not have a good outcome and many continue to have low back pain. The reasons for this are unclear but impairment of back muscle function due to months of inactivity before surgery may be a contributing factor. A postoperative exercise program may improve outcome in such patients. Twenty patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy were randomized into EXERCISE and CONTROL groups. After surgery, all patients received normal postoperative care that included advice from a physiotherapist about exercise and a return to normal activities. Six weeks after surgery, patients in the EXERCISE group undertook a 4-week exercise program that concentrated on improving strength and endurance of the back and abdominal muscles and mobility of the spine and hips. Assessments of spinal function were performed in all patients during the week before surgery and at 6, 10, 26, and 52 weeks after. The assessment included measures of posture, hip and lumbar mobility, back muscle endurance capacity and electromyographic measures of back muscle fatigue. On each occasion, patients completed questionnaires inquiring about pain, disability and psychological status. Surgery improved pain, disability, back muscle endurance capacity and hip and lumbar mobility in both groups of patients. After the exercise program, the EXERCISE group showed further improvements in these measures and also in electromyographic measures of back muscle fatigability. All these improvements were maintained 12 months after surgery. The only further improvement showed by the CONTROL group between 6 and 52 weeks was an increase in back muscle endurance capacity. A 4-week postoperative exercise program can improve pain, disability, and spinal function inpatients who undergo microdiscectomy. [Key words: electromyogram median frequency, exercise therapy, intervertebral disc prolapse, microdiscectomy, randomized controlled trial, spinal function.

Long-Term Outcomes of Standard Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Article

Apr 2001

A retrospective analysis of the long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. To investigate the long-term outcomes of standard discectomy to address postoperative problems, including residual low back pain and recurrent herniation. Most previous investigators found that favorable outcomes of standard discectomy were maintained for the long-term postoperative period. Although they observed postoperative complications such as residual low back pain and recurrent herniation, detailed analyses of these results have not been conducted. The long-term follow-up results in patients who were observed for a minimum of 10 years after standard discectomy were evaluated by using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system through direct examinations and questionnaires. Radiography also was used in patients who agreed to visit the hospital, and findings were compared with those on preoperative radiographs. The average recovery rate calculated by using Japanese Orthopedic Association scores was 73.5 +/- 21.7%. Even though residual low back pain was found in 74.6% of the patients, only 12.7% had severe low back pain. The majority of the patients with severe low back pain were under 35 years of age at the time of operation, with preoperative advanced disc degeneration. The final Japanese Orthopedic Association scores in the patients with decreased disc height were significantly lower than those in patients with no decrease. However, the disc height of patients with a recurrent herniation was preserved. The long-term outcome of standard discectomy in this series was favorable. Although patients with preserved disc height generally had favorable results, the risk of recurrent disc herniation was high in this population.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Neural Mobilization After Spinal Surgery

Article

Jan 2002

Randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. To determine whether the addition of neural mobilization to standard postoperative care improved the outcome of lumbar spinal surgery. It has been suggested that neural mobilization should be performed after spinal surgery to prevent nerve root adhesions and improve outcome. However, to date, there is no convincing evidence of the value of neural mobilization. Eighty-one patients undergoing lumbar discectomy, fusion, or laminectomy at a private hospital in Sydney were randomly allocated to standard postoperative care or standard care plus neural mobilization. Neural mobilization included passive movements and active exercises designed to mobilize the lumbosacral nerve roots and sciatic tract. Primary outcome measures were global perceived effect measured on a 7-point scale, pain measured using visual analogue scales and the McGill Pain Questionnaire, and disability measured with the Quebec Disability Scale. All patients received the treatment as allocated with 12-month follow-up data available for 76 patients (94% of those randomized). There were no statistically significant or clinically significant benefits provided by the neural mobilization treatment for any outcome. The neural mobilization protocol evaluated in this study did not provide an additional benefit to standard postoperative care for patients undergoing spinal surgery. The authors advocate that this protocol not be used in clinical practice.

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

Article

Feb 2002

Although several rehabilitation programs, physical fitness programs or protocols regarding instruction for patients to return to work after lumbar disc surgery have been suggested, little is known about the efficacy and effectiveness of these treatments. There are still persistent fears of causing re-injury, re-herniation, or instability. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of active treatments that are used in the rehabilitation after first-time lumbar disc surgery. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psyclit databases up to April 2000 and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register 2001, Issue 3. Both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on any type of active rehabilitation program after first-time disc surgery were included. Two independent reviewers performed the inclusion of studies and two other reviewers independently performed the methodological quality assessment. A rating system that consists of four levels of scientific evidence summarizes the results. Thirteen studies were included, six of which were of high quality. There is no strong evidence for the effectiveness for any treatment starting immediately post-surgery, mainly because of lack of (good quality) studies. For treatments that start four to six weeks post-surgery there is strong evidence (level 1) that intensive exercise programs are more effective on functional status and faster return to work (short-term follow-up) as compared to mild exercise programs and there is strong evidence (level 1) that on long term follow up there is no difference between intensive exercise programs and mild exercise programs with regard to overall improvement. For all other primary outcome measures for the comparison between intensive and mild exercise programs there is conflicting evidence (level 3) with regard to long-term follow-up. Furthermore, there is no strong evidence for the effectiveness of supervised training as compared to home exercises. There was also no strong evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation as compared to usual care. There is limited evidence (level 3) that treatments in working populations that aim at return to work are more effective than usual care with regard to return to work. Also, there is limited evidence (level 3) that low-tech and high-tech exercises, started more than 12 months post-surgery are more effective in improving low back functional status as compared to physical agents, joint manipulations or no treatment. Finally, there is no strong evidence for the effectiveness of any specific intervention when added to an exercise program, regardless of whether exercise programs start immediately post-surgery or later. None of the investigated treatments seem harmful with regard to re-herniation or re-operation. There is no evidence that patients need to have their activities restricted after first time lumbar disc surgery. There is strong evidence for intensive exercise programs (at least if started about 4-6 weeks post-operative) on short term for functional status and faster return to work and there is no evidence they increase the re-operation rate. It is unclear what the exact content of post-surgery rehabilitation should be. Moreover, there are no studies that investigated whether active rehabilitation programs should start immediately post-surgery or possibly four to six weeks later.

The effectiveness of exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: A randomized controlled study

Article

Feb 2005

To compare two different exercise programmes versus a control group, after lumbar disc surgery. A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study. Outpatient clinic of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Sixty patients diagnosed as having single level lumbar disc herniation with clinical examination and MRI evaluation and who had undergone lumbar discectomy (post-operative first month) at a single level. Patients with serious pathologies involving the cardiac and respiratory systems that could prevent them from doing exercises were excluded. Intervention: The patients were randomly split into three groups. The first group received an intensive exercise programme and back school education while the second group received a home exercise programme and back school education. The third group was defined as the control group and did not receive education or exercise. The patients were evaluated at the beginning and end of the treatment with clinical parameters, pain levels, endurance tests and weight-lifting tests, modified Oswestry Disability Index, Beck Depression Inventory, Low Back Pain Rating Scale and return to work. The groups doing exercises experienced a decrease in the severity of pain and disability, also functional parameters showed better improvement than the control group. The intensive exercise programme was better than the home exercise programme. It seems that intensive exercise is more effective in reduction of pain and disability, but whether it is cost-effective is not clear.

The Effect of Early Isolated Lumbar Extension Exercise Program for Patients with Herniated Disc Undergoing Lumbar Discectomy

Article

Oct 2005
NEUROSURGERY

To determine the effects of a postoperative early isolated lumbar extension muscle-strengthening program on pain, disability, return to work, and power of back muscle after operation for herniated lumbar disc. Seventy-five patients were randomized into an exercise group (20 men, 15 women) and a control group (18 men, 22 women) to perform a prospective controlled trial of a lumbar extension exercise program in patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy or percutaneous endoscopic discectomy. Six weeks after surgery, patients in the exercise group undertook a 12-week lumbar extension exercise program. The assessment included measures of lumbar extensor power by the MedX (Ocala, FL) lumbar extension machine, muscle mass of multifidus and longissimus (L4-L5 cross-sectional area) by computed tomography. All patients completed the visual analog scale and the Oswestry disability index to assess pain and disability, respectively. Return to work data were also investigated. After the exercise program, significant improvements were observed in the exercise group versus the control group for lumbar extensor power (51.67% versus 17.55%, respectively; P < 0.05), the cross-sectional area of multifidus and longissimus muscle (29.23% versus 7.2%, respectively; P < 0.05), and the visual analog scale score (2.51 versus 4.30, respectively; P < 0.05). The percentages of returning to work within 4 months after surgery were significantly greater in the exercise group than in the control group (87% versus 24%, respectively). Although this was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), the Oswestry disability index scores in the exercise group were better than that in control group (24.6 versus 30.6, respectively). These results support the positive effects of the postoperative early lumbar extension muscle-strengthening program on pain, return to work, and strength of back muscles in patients after operation of herniated lumbar disc.

A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus

Article

Jan 2006
J CLIN EPIDEMIOL

To develop a checklist of items measuring the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing nonpharmacological treatments (NPTs). The Delphi consensus method was used to select and reduce the number of items in the checklist. A total of 154 individuals were invited to participate: epidemiologists and statisticians involved in the field of methodology of RCTs (n = 55), members of the Cochrane Collaboration (n = 41), and clinicians involved in planning NPT clinical trials (n = 58). Participants ranked on a 10-point Likert scale whether an item should be included in the checklist. Fifty-five experts (36%) participated in the survey. They were experienced in systematic reviews (68% were involved in the Cochrane Collaboration) and in planning RCTs (76%). Three rounds of the Delphi method were conducted to achieve consensus. The final checklist contains 10 items and 5 subitems, with items related to the standardization of the intervention, care provider influence, and additional measures to minimize the potential bias from lack of blinding of participants, care providers, and outcome assessors. This tool can be used to critically appraise the medical literature, design NPT studies, and assess the quality of trial reports included in systematic reviews.

Comparison of usual surgical advice versus a nonaggravating six-month gym-based exercise rehabilitation program post-lumbar discectomy: results at one-year follow-up

Article

Jul 2006
SPINE J

Discectomy is the surgery of choice for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome. Previous studies on the postsurgical management of these cases compare one exercise regime to another. This study compares an exercise-based group with a control group involving no formal exercise or rehabilitation. The outcomes of a formal postsurgical exercise-based rehabilitation when compared with the usual rehabilitative surgical advice were evaluated. A randomized clinical trial comparing management regimes after lumbar discectomies. Ninety-three lumbar discectomy patients were randomized to two groups. The following postoperative outcomes were used: levels of pain; levels of function; psychological well-being; time off work; levels of medication; and number of doctor/therapist visits. Ninety-three lumbar discectomy patients were randomized to two groups. The treatment group undertook a 6-month supervised nonaggravating exercise program. The control group followed the usual surgical advice to resume normal activities as soon as the pain allowed. Both groups were followed for 1 year by using validated outcome measures. The results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis. Patients in both groups improved during the 1-year follow-up (p=.001). There was no statistical significance between the groups at the clinical endpoint. The treatment group returned to work 7 days earlier and had fewer days off work in the 1-year follow-up period. There was no statistical advantage gained by the group that performed the 6-month supervised nonaggravating exercise program at 1-year follow-up. They did, however, have fewer days off work.

United States' Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992-2003

Article

Dec 2006
SPINE

Repeated cross-sectional analysis using national Medicare data from the Dartmouth Atlas Project. To describe recent trends and geographic variation in population-based rates of lumbar fusion spine surgery. Lumbar fusion rates have increased dramatically during the 1980s and even more so in the 1990s. The most rapid increase appeared to follow the approval of a new surgical implant device. Medicare claims and enrollment data were used to calculate age, sex, and race-adjusted rates of lumbar laminectomy/discectomy and lumbar fusion for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries over age 65 in each of the 306 US Hospital Referral Regions between 1992 and 2003. Lumbar fusion rates have increased steadily since 1992 (0.3 per 1000 enrollees in 1992 to 1.1 per 1000 enrollees in 2003). Regional rates of lumbar discectomy, laminectomy, and fusion in 1992-1993 were highly correlated to rates of discectomy, laminectomy (R2 = 0.44), and fusion (R2 = 0.28) in 2002-2003. There was a nearly 8-fold variation in regional rates of lumbar discectomy and laminectomy in 2002 and 2003. In the case of lumbar fusion, there was nearly a 20-fold range in rates among Medicare enrollees in 2002 and 2003. This represents the largest coefficient of variation seen with any surgical procedure. Medicare spending for inpatient back surgery more than doubled over the decade. Spending for lumbar fusion increased more than 500%, from 75 million dollars to 482 million dollars. In 1992, lumbar fusion represented 14% of total spending for back surgery; by 2003, lumbar fusion accounted for 47% of spending. The rate of specific procedures within a region or "surgical signature" is remarkably stable over time. However, there has been a marked increase in rates of fusion, and a coincident shift and increase in cost. Rates of back surgery were not correlated with the per-capita supply of orthopedic and neurosurgeons.

Transforaminal Posterolateral Endoscopic Discectomy With or Without the Combination of a Low-Dose Chymopapain: A Prospective Randomized Study in 280 Consecutive Cases

Article

Dec 2006
SPINE

A prospective randomized study involving 280 consecutive cases of lumbar disc herniation managed either by an endoscopic discectomy alone or an endoscopic discectomy combined with an intradiscal injection of a low dose (1000 U) of chymopapain. To compare outcome, complications, and reherniations of both techniques. Despite a low complication rate, posterolateral endoscopic nucleotomy has made a lengthy evolution because of an assumed limited indication. Chemonucleolysis, however, proven to be safe and effective, has not continued to be accepted by the majority in the spinal community as microdiscectomy is considered to be more reliable. A total of 280 consecutive patients with a primary herniated, including sequestrated, lumbar disc with predominant leg pain, was randomized. A clinical follow-up was performed at 3 months, and at 1 and 2 years after the index operation with an extensive questionnaire, including the visual analog scale for pain and the MacNab criteria. The cohort integrity at 3 months was 100%, at 1 year 96%, and at 2 years 92%. At the 3-month evaluation, only minor complications were registered. At 1-year postoperatively, group 1 (endoscopy alone) had a recurrence rate of 6.9% compared to group 2 (the combination therapy), with a recurrence rate of 1.6%, which was a statistically significant difference in favor of the combination therapy (P = 0045). At the 2-year follow-up, group 1 reported that 85.4% had an excellent or good result, 6.9% a fair result, and 7.7% were not satisfied. At the 2-year follow-up, group 2 reported that 93.3% had an excellent or good result, 2.5% a fair result, and 4.2% were not satisfied. This outcome was statistically significant in favor of the group including chymopapain. There were no infections or patients with any form of permanent iatrogenic nerve damage, and no patients had a major complication. A high percentage of patient satisfaction could be obtained with a posterior lateral endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation, and a statistically significant improvement of the results was obtained when an intradiscal injection of 1000 U of chymopapain was added. There was a low recurrence rate with no major complications. The method can be applied in any type of lumbar disc herniation, including the L5-S1 level.

Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse

Article

Feb 2007

Disc prolapse accounts for five percent of low-back disorders but is one of the most common reasons for surgery. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of surgical interventions for the treatment of lumbar disc prolapse. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PubMed, Spine and abstracts of the main spine society meetings within the last five years. We also checked the reference lists of each retrieved articles and corresponded with experts. All data found up to 1 January 2007 are included. Randomized trials (RCT) and quasi-randomized trials (QRCT) of the surgical management of lumbar disc prolapse. Two review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data from published papers. Additional information was sought from the authors if necessary. Forty RCTs and two QRCTs were identified, including 17 new trials since the first edition of this review in 1999. Many of the early trials were of some form of chemonucleolysis, whereas the majority of the later studies either compared different techniques of discectomy or the use of some form of membrane to reduce epidural scarring. Despite the critical importance of knowing whether surgery is beneficial for disc prolapse, only four trials have directly compared discectomy with conservative management and these give suggestive rather than conclusive results. However, other trials show that discectomy produces better clinical outcomes than chemonucleolysis and that in turn is better than placebo. Microdiscectomy gives broadly comparable results to standard discectomy. Recent trials of an inter-position gel covering the dura (five trials) and of fat (four trials) show that they can reduce scar formation, though there is limited evidence about the effect on clinical outcomes. There is insufficient evidence on other percutaneous discectomy techniques to draw firm conclusions. Three small RCTs of laser discectomy do not provide conclusive evidence on its efficacy, There are no published RCTs of coblation therapy or trans-foraminal endoscopic discectomy. Surgical discectomy for carefully selected patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapse provides faster relief from the acute attack than conservative management, although any positive or negative effects on the lifetime natural history of the underlying disc disease are still unclear. Microdiscectomy gives broadly comparable results to open discectomy. The evidence on other minimally invasive techniques remains unclear (with the exception of chemonucleolysis using chymopapain, which is no longer widely available).

Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Disc Prolapse

Article

Aug 2007
SPINE

An updated Cochrane Review. To assess the effects of surgical interventions for the treatment of lumbar disc prolapse. Disc prolapse accounts for 5% of low back disorders yet is one of the most common reasons for surgery. There is still little scientific evidence supporting some interventions. Use of standard Cochrane review methods to analyze all randomized controlled trials published up to January 1, 2007. Forty randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 quasi-RCTs were identified. Many of the early trials were of some form of chemonucleolysis, whereas the majority of the later studies either compared different techniques of discectomy or the use of some form of membrane to reduce epidural scarring. Four trials directly compared discectomy with conservative management, and these give suggestive rather than conclusive results. However, other trials show that discectomy produces better clinical outcomes than chemonucleolysis, and that in turn is better than placebo. Microdiscectomy gives broadly comparable results to standard discectomy. Recent trials of an interposition gel covering the dura (5 trials) and of fat (4 trials) show that they can reduce scar formation, although there is limited evidence about the effect on clinical outcomes. There is insufficient evidence on other percutaneous discectomy techniques to draw firm conclusions. Three small RCTs of laser discectomy do not provide conclusive evidence on its efficacy. There are no published RCTs of coblation therapy or transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. Surgical discectomy for carefully selected patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc prolapse provides faster relief from the acute attack than conservative management, although any positive or negative effects on the lifetime natural history of the underlying disc disease are still unclear. The evidence for other minimally invasive techniques remains unclear except for chemonucleolysis using chymopapain, which is no longer widely available.

Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Microsurgical Technique: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Article

May 2008
SPINE

Prospective, randomized, controlled study of patients with lumbar disc herniations, operated either in a full-endoscopic or microsurgical technique. Comparison of results of lumbar discectomies in full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal technique with the conventional microsurgical technique. Even with good results, conventional disc operations may result in subsequent damage due to trauma. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer intraoperatively and after surgery. With the transforaminal and interlaminar techniques, 2 full-endoscopic procedures are available for lumbar disc operations. One hundred seventy-eight patients with full-endoscopic or microsurgical discectomy underwent follow-up for 2 years. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: VAS, German version North American Spine Society Instrument, Oswestry Low-Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. After surgery 82% of the patients no longer had leg pain, and 14% had occasional pain. The clinical results were the same in both groups. The recurrence rate was 6.2% with no difference between the groups. The full-endoscopic techniques brought significant advantages in the following areas: back pain, rehabilitation, complications, and traumatization. The clinical results of the full-endoscopic technique are equal to those of the microsurgical technique. At the same time, there are advantages in the operation technique and reduced traumatization. With the surgical devices and the possibility of selecting an interlaminar or posterolateral to lateral transforaminal procedure, lumbar disc herniations outside and inside the spinal canal can be sufficiently removed using the full-endoscopic technique, when taking the appropriate criteria into account. Full-endoscopic surgery is a sufficient and safe supplementation and alternative to microsurgical procedures.

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

Abstract

No full-text available

Recommended publications

Last Chance to Apply! 18 Assistant & Associate Professor positions at VU Amsterdam

See our 18 open Asst/Assoc. Professor positions at the science faculty of VU Amsterdam

Rehabilitation After Lumbar Disc Surgery An Update Cochrane Review