ArticlePDF Available

Unconscious Herding Behavior as the Psychological Basis of Financial Market Trends and Patterns

Authors:

Abstract

Human herding behavior results from impulsive mental activity in individuals responding to signals from the behavior of others. Impulsive thought originates in the basal ganglia and limbic system. In emotionally charged situations, the limbic system's impulses are typically faster than rational reflection performed by the neocortex. Experiments with a small number of naïve individuals as well as statistics reflecting the behavior of large groups of financial professionals provide evidence of herding behavior. Herding behavior, while appropriate in some primitive life-threatening situations, is inappropriate and counterproductive to success in financial situations. Unconscious impulses that evolved in order to attain positive values and avoid negative values spur herding behavior, making rational independence extremely difficult to exercise in group settings. A negative feedback loop develops because stress increases impulsive mental activity, and impulsive mental activity in financial situations, by inducing failure, increases stress. The interaction of many minds in a collective setting produces super-organic behavior that is patterned according to the survival-related functions of the primitive portions of the brain. As long as the human mind comprises the triune construction and its functions, patterns of herding behavior will remain immutable.
THE PRACTITIONER’S PERSPECTIVE
Unconscious Herding Behavior as the Psychological Basis
of Financial Market Trends and Patterns
Robert R. Prechter, Jr.
Human herding behavior results from impulsive mental activity in individuals re-
sponding to signals from the behavior of others. Impulsive thought originates in the
basal ganglia and limbic system. In emotionally charged situations, the limbic sys-
tem’s impulses are typically faster than rational reflection performed by the neocor-
tex. Experiments with a small number of naïve individuals as well as statistics reflect-
ing the behavior of large groups of financial professionals provide evidence of
herding behavior. Herding behavior, while appropriate in some primitive life-threat-
ening situations, is inappropriate and counterproductive to success in financial situa-
tions. Unconscious impulses that evolved in order to attain positive values and avoid
negative values spur herding behavior, making rational independence extremely diffi-
culttoexerciseingroup settings. A negative feedback loop developsbecausestressin-
creases impulsive mental activity, and impulsive mental activity in financial situa-
tions, by inducing failure, increases stress. The interaction of many minds in a
collective setting produces super-organic behavior that is patterned according to the
survival-related functions of the primitive portions of the brain. As long as the human
mind comprises the triune construction and its functions, patterns of herding behav-
ior will remain immutable.
Experimental research suggests that human beings
possess biologically based psychological sources of
unconscious emotional imperatives that cause a coop-
erative interaction on the part of financial market par-
ticipants. If so, not only might mass emotional change
betheprimarymoveroffinancialmarketprices,butwe
may also expect its operation to be immutable.
The Triune Brain
Paul MacLean, former head of the Laboratory for
Brain Evolution at the National Institute of Mental
Health, has developed the concept of a “triune” brain,
i.e., one that is divided into three basic parts: the brain
stem, the limbic system and the neocortex.1While the
neocortex processes ideas by reason, the more primi-
tive portions of the brain control impulses and emo-
tions that propel actions that are lifesaving or life-en-
hancing under most circumstances. Along with such
matters as fighting, fleeing, hoarding, territorialism
and breeding, the basal ganglia control herding behav-
ior, while the limbic system produces emotions as a
spur to further these objectives. The rational cortex
cannot influence the impulses generated by these por-
tions of the brain.
As a primitive tool of survival, emotional impulses
from the limbic system impel a desire among individ-
uals to seek signals from others in matters of knowl-
edge and behavior and therefore to align their feel-
ings and convictions with those of the group. The
desire to belong to and be accepted by the group is
particularly powerful in intensely emotional social
settings, when it can overwhelm the higher brain
functions.
Anatomically related studies (Ledoux, 1989) led to
the discovery of neural pathways for emotional re-
sponse that do not go through the neocortex and which
are up to 40 milliseconds faster than the neocortex. Be-
cause the limbic system is quicker in response than the
neocortex, emotions are often not reactions to consid-
ered ideas but immediate reactions to perceptions re-
layed by the senses. Herding behavior, because it de-
The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets
2001, Vol. 2, No. 3, 120–125 Copyright © 2001 by
The Institute of Psychology and Markets
120
Robert R. Prechter, Jr. is president of a financial market-fore-
casting firm. His latest book is The Wave Principle of Human Social
Behavior and the New Science of Socionomics (New Classics Li-
brary, 1999), which expands upon the subject of this article.
Requests for reprints should be sent to: Robert R. Prechter, Jr.,
Elliott Wave International, P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, GA 30503.
Email: rprechter@elliottwave.com
rives from the same primitive portion of the brain, is
similarly unreflective and impulsive.
When are individuals’ herding impulses most like-
ly to be activated, making people join together to pro-
duce collective agreement in thought and action? De-
pendence upon the behavior of others most easily
substitutes for rigorous reasoning when knowledge is
lacking or logic irrelevant. In a realm such as invest-
ing, where so few are knowledgeable, or in a realm
such as fads and fashion, where logic is inappropriate
and the whole point is to impress other people, the
tendency toward dependence is pervasive. Trends in
such activities are steered not by the rational deci-
sions of individual minds but by the peculiar collec-
tive sensibilities of the herd.
Herding Psychology
and Financial Markets
In the 1920s, Pigou connected cooperative social
dynamics to booms and depression. His idea is that in-
dividuals routinely correct their own errors of thought
when operating alone but abdicate their responsibility
to do so in matters that have strong social agreement,
regardless of the egregiousness of the ideational error.
In Pigou’s words,
Apart altogether from the financial ties by which dif-
ferent businessmen are bound together, there exists
among them a certain measure of psychological in-
terdependence. A change of tone in one part of the
business world diffuses itself, in a quite unreasoning
manner, over other and wholly disconnected parts.
(Vittachi & Faber, 1998)
“Wall Street” certainly shares aspects of a crowd,
and there is abundant evidence that herding behavior
exists among stock market participants. Myriad mea-
sures of market optimism and pessimism2show that
in the aggregate, such sentiments among both the
public and financial professionals wax and wane con-
currently with the trend and level of the market. This
tendency is not simply fairly common; it is ubiqui-
tous. Most people get virtually all of their ideas about
financial markets from other people, through newspa-
pers, television, tipsters and analysts, without check-
ing a thing. They think, “Who am I to check? These
other people are supposed to be experts.” Many peo-
ple are emotionally dependent upon the ticker tape,
which simply reports the aggregate short-term deci-
sion-making of others. This dependence is nearly uni-
versal, even among long-term investors. They are
driven to follow the herd because they do not have
firsthand knowledge adequate to form an independent
conviction, which makes them seek wisdom in num-
bers. The unconscious says: You have too little basis
upon which to exercise reason; your only alternative
is to assume that the herd knows where it’s going.
When a crowd is in command, participating individuals
appear rational on the outside, but inside, their im-
pulses and emotions are in control.
Smith, Suchanek and Williams [1988] conducted
sixty laboratory market simulations using as few as a
dozen volunteers, typically economics students but in
some experiments businessmen. The subjects received
the same perfect knowledge of coming dividend pros-
pects and then an actual declared dividend at the end of
the simulated trading day, which could vary more or less
randomly but which would average a certain amount.
Despite this ideal environment of perfect knowledge, the
subjects in these experiments repeatedly created a
boom-and-bust market profile. The extremity of that pro-
file was a function of the participants’lack of experience
in the speculative arena. Head research economist
Vernon L. Smith came to this conclusion: “Experienced
subjects frequently produce a market bubble, but the
likelihood is smaller than for inexperienced subjects.
When the same group returns for a third market, the bub-
ble disappears.” In the real world, “these bubbles and
crashes would be a lot less likely if the same traders were
in the market all the time” (Bishop, 1987), but novices
are always entering the market. While these experiments
were conducted as if participants could actually possess
true knowledge of coming events and so-called funda-
mental value, no such knowledge is available in the real
world. The fact that participants create a boom–bust pat-
tern anyway is overwhelming evidence of the power of
the herding impulse.
The lower graph in Figure 1 shows the real-world re-
sult of the public’s impulse to herd. As you can see, the
general investing population commits more money to the
market as it rises and less as it falls, behavior opposite
from that which would generate profits.
It is not only novices and individual investors who fall
in line. It is a lesser-known fact that the vast majority of
professionals herd just like the naïve majority. The mid-
dle graph in Figure 1 shows the percentage of cash held
at institutions as it relates to the level of the S&P 500
Composite Index. As you can see, the two data series
move roughly together, showing that institutional portfo-
lio managers herd in the market’s direction for the most
part right along with the public.
Apparent expressions of cold reason by professional
stock analysts follow herding patterns as well. Finance
professorRobertOlsen[1996]conductedastudyof4000
corporate earnings estimates by company analysts and
reached this conclusion:
Experts’ earnings predictions exhibit positive bias and
disappointing accuracy. These shortcomings are usually
attributed to some combination of incomplete knowl-
edge,incompetence, and/or misrepresentation. This arti-
cle suggests that the human desire for consensus leads to
herding behavior among earnings forecasters.
121
UNCONSCIOUS HERDING BEHAVIOR
122
PRECHTER
FIGURE 1
Evidence of Herding Behavior in Stock Market Activity
In that paper, Olsen shows that the greater the diffi-
culty in forecasting earnings per share, which is a
source of stress, the more analysts’herding behavior
increases. Equally important, the more their herding
behavior increases, the greater the bias in their earn-
ings estimates. The greater an aggregate bias becomes,
the less accurate are the aggregate forecasts. This is a
self-reinforcing system with failure the motivator of
further failure. Available records show that profes-
sional corporate analysts’ opinions track the trend of
the market, also in precisely the opposite fashion from
that which would generate profits.
The reason that forecasters’ inaccuracy worsens
with herding is that the net valuation of the stock mar-
ketistheresult of herding. To forecast on the basis of
the current sentiments of the herd is to “forecast” the
present mood, not future events. Success is simply a
matter of whether the present mood maintains, which it
usually does not.
How can seemingly rational professionals be so ut-
terly seduced by the opinion of their peers to the effect
that they will not only hold, but also change opinions
collectively? MacLean [1990] explains, “the limbic
system has the capacity to generate out-of-context, af-
fective feelings of conviction that we attach to our be-
liefs regardless of whether they are true or false.” In
other words, the neocortex is functionally disassoci-
ated from the limbic system. This means not only that
feelings of conviction may attach to utterly contradic-
tory ideas in different people, but also that they can do
so in the same person at different times. In other words,
a person may hold opposite views with equally intense
emotion, depending upon the demands of survival per-
ceived by the primitive portions of the brain. This fact
relates directly to the behavior of financial market par-
ticipants, who can be flushed with confidence one day
and in a state of utter panic the next. As Robert Schiller
put it in a New York Times article in 1989, “You would
think enlightened people would not have firm opin-
ions” about markets, “but they do, and it changes all
the time.” (Passell) In each case, they are fully capable
of explaining their new conviction, all such utterances
being simply (yet sometimes superficially brilliant)
rationalizations obediently generated by the neocortex.
As market analyst Paul Macrae Montgomery [1991]
explains, “to the limbic system, the phrase ‘net present
value of future cash flows’is meaningless because its
only sense of time is now and only value is pleasure or
relief from stress.” To relieve that stress without cogni-
tive dissonance, the neocortex must generate “reasons”
for a person’s action, which justify the attendant
emotional imperative. Throughout the herding pro-
cess, whether the markets are real or simulated, and
whether the participants are novices or professionals,
the conviction of the rightness of stock valuation at
each price level is powerful, emotional and impervious
to argument.
Emotional Stress as the Limbic
System’s Herding Motivator
Falling into line with others for self-preservation in-
volvesnotonlythe pursuitof positivevaluesbutalso the
avoidance of negative values, in which case the emo-
tions reinforcing herding behavior are even stronger.
Reptiles and birds harass strangers. A flock of poultry
willpeckto deathanyindividualbirdthat haswoundsor
blemishes. Likewise, humans can be a threat to each
otherif there areperceiveddifferences between them.It
is an advantage to survival, then, to avoid rejection by
revealing your sameness. D.C. Gajdusek [1970] re-
searched a long-hidden Stone Age tribe that had never
seen Western people and soon noticed that they mim-
icked his behavior; whenever he scratched his head or
put his hand on his hip, the whole tribe did the same
thing. Says MacLean, “It has been suggested that such
imitationmay have some protectivevalueby signifying,
‘I am like you.’ He adds, “This form of behavior is
phylogenetically deeply ingrained.” Thus, another ad-
vantageofherdingbehavior istheavoidanceof seeming
difference in order to defuse an excuse to attack.
This tendency toward mimicry is hardly confined to
Stone Age tribes. Psychology professor Irving Janis
[1972], after studying the dynamics of group decision
making in the modern political setting, concluded, “In
general, the greater the number of those in the decision
maker’s social network who are aware of the decision,
the more powerful the incentive to avoid the social dis-
approval that might result from a reversal.” What’s
more, “The greater the commitment to a prior decision,
the greater the anticipated utilitarian losses, social dis-
approval and self-disapproval from failing to continue
the present course of action and hence a greater degree
of stress.”
Thatis why,in financial markets, when thebest time
to buy or sell is at hand, even the person who thinks he
should take action experiences a strong psychological
pressuretorefrainfrom doingso. He thinks, if onlyhalf
consciously, “When my neighbor or advisor or friend
thinks it’s a good idea, then I’ll do it, too. If I do it now,
and I’m wrong, they will all call me a dope, and I’ll be
theonlydope.I’llbesingledoutfor ridicule,whichisnot
only agonizing but dangerous.” Pressure from, and in-
fluence by, peers, then, is at least one reason why most
peoplecannotbringthemselvestochangefrom abullish
to bearish orientation or vice versa if to do so would go
against the ideas of their associates and contacts. It also
explainswhya marketorother socialtrend cancontinue
for a long, long time and why financial valuations can
becomesoextremeasto appearoutrageoustothose who
believe that people ought to base their decisions ratio-
nally upon some calculable fundamental value.
The discomfort of being alone in one’s convictions
is so great that it involves physical reactions. “Emo-
tional mentation,” says MacLean, “represents the only
123
UNCONSCIOUS HERDING BEHAVIOR
form of psychological experience that, by itself, may
induce pronounced autonomic activity” such as sweat-
ing, twitching, flushing, muscle tightening and hair
standing on end. A person’s reaction just thinking
about taking an action apart from the herd can produce
tenseness or even nausea. He knows from experience
that anyone who shares a prevailing majority opinion
on any subject, particularly one that is intensely at-
tended by the emotions of the limbic system (such as
politics, religion, wealth or sex), is treated with the re-
spect due his obvious intelligence and morality. One
who utters an opposing opinion is immediately pun-
ished by a chorus of deprecating smiles, cackling,
mooing, snorting, nipping or outright hostility. It may
sound funny, but if you are not used to verbal vicious-
ness or rejection by the group, they are painful experi-
ences, and most people cannot abide either.
Emotionally removed historians sometimes decry
the lack of prescience among a population prior to a
long-ago financial crisis or the lack of vocal critics in
countries that are taken over by fascists, communists,
inquisitors or witch-burners. Yet unless one is there, it
is nearly impossible to imagine the social pressure to
go along with the trend of the day. In many political
and religious social settings, for example, “I am not
like you” can mean death. The limbic system bluntly
assumes that all expressions of “I am not like you” are
infused with danger. Thus, herding and mimicking are
preservative behavior. They are powerful because they
are impelled, regardless of reasoning, by a primitive
system of mentation that, however uninformed, is try-
ing to save your life. In many cases, it does just that.
Unfortunatelyfor humansin moderntimes,there are
important exceptions to that benefit. Herding behavior
is counterproductive to success in the world of modern
financial speculation. If a financial market is soaring or
crashing, the limbic system senses an opportunity or a
threat and orders you to join the herd so that your
chancesforsuccess orsurvivalwillimprove.Thelimbic
system produces emotions that support those impulses,
including hope, euphoria, caution and panic. The ac-
tionsthusimpelled leadoneinevitablyto theoppositeof
survival and success, which is why the vast majority of
people lose when they speculate.3In a great number of
situations, hoping and herding can contribute to your
well-being. Not in financial markets. In many cases,
panickingandfleeingwhen othersdocuts yourrisk.Not
in financial markets. Moreover, because impulses and
emotions result from rigid, “hard wired” thought pro-
cesses,repeated failure in speculation and the attendant
agony usually do little to deter the behavior.
From Individuals to Aggregates
We may not characterize these primitive impulses
and emotions as rational, as they operate independ-
ently of reason. Yet neither may we label them ir-
rational,becausetheyhave a purpose, no matter howill
applied in modern life. When the unconscious mind
operates, it could hardly do so randomly, as that would
mean no thought at all. It must operate in patterns pe-
culiar to it. This is clearly the case among speculators,
whose impulses produce the same patterns of aggre-
gate behavior over and over. Can we link such patterns
in individuals to the formation of a super-organic col-
lective pattern? There is evidence to support this hy-
pothesis as well.
Sornette and Johansen [1997] specifically connect
the stock market to the primitive mentation of animals,
including their occasional collective mentation: “In-
stead of the usual interpretation of the efficient market
hypothesis in which traders extract and incorporate
consciously (by their action) all information contained
in market prices, we propose that the market as a whole
canexhibit an ‘emergent’behavior notsharedby any of
its constituent[s]. In other words, we have in mind the
process of the emergence of intelligent behavior at a
macroscopic scale that individuals at the microscopic
scale have no idea of.” Biologists have made similar
analogies with respect to ant colonies, bee swarms and
other animal populations.
To form such emergent behavior, individuals’ im-
pulses to herd must relate to signals from the social en-
vironment. Since all participants in a particular social
settingshare the same environment, the combinationof
like minds produces global patterns of interactive dy-
namics in a social setting. This is particularly true of fi-
nancial markets, where participants hear the same
news and watch the same price quotations, thus receiv-
ing substantially identical signals. Since the partici-
pants themselves generate many of the signals, the re-
sult is a feedback loop of information and impulsivity.
This process generates the trends and patterns of prices
in financial markets.
As we have seen, the essential engine of the pro-
cess is the mass interaction of numerous rigid, unrea-
soning basal ganglia and limbic systems. We may
thus conclude that aggregate human interpersonal dy-
namics, and therefore the subset of speculative finan-
cial market dynamics, will remain immutable unless
and until there evolves a change in the operation of
the triune brain that constitutes the human mind.
Notes
1. I would like to thank Paul Macrae Montgomery of Universal
Economics for alerting me to MacLean’s material.
2. Such measures include put and call volume ratios, cash hold-
ings by institutions, index futures premiums, the activity of
margined investors, and reports of market opinion from bro-
kers, traders, newsletter writers and investors.
3. There is a myth, held by nearly all people outside of back-of-
fice employees of brokerage firms and the IRS, that many peo-
124
PRECHTER
ple do well in financial speculation. Actually, almost everyone
loses at the game eventually. The head of a futures brokerage
firm once confided to me that never in the firm’s history had
customers in the aggregate had a winning year. Even in the
stock market, when the public or even most professionals win,
it is a temporary, albeit sometimes prolonged, phenomenon.
The next big bear market usually wipes them out if they live
long enough, and if they do not, it wipes out their successors.
This is true regardless of today’s accepted wisdom that the
stock market always goes to new highs eventually. Aside from
thefact that this very convictionis false (Where was the Roman
stock market during the Dark Ages?), what counts is when peo-
ple act, and that is what ruins them.
References
Bishop, Jerry E. “Stock Market Experiment Suggests Inevitability of
Booms and Busts.” Wall Street Journal, (November 17, 1987),
p. 31.
Gajdusek,D.C. “PhysiologicalAnd Psychological Characteristics of
Stone Age Man.” Symposium on Biological Bases of Human
Behavior, Eng. Sci. 33, (1970), pp. 26–33, 56–62.
Janis, Irving L. Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,
1972.
LeDoux, J.E. “Cognitive–Emotional Interactions in the Brain.Cog-
nition and Emotion, 3, (1989), pp. 267–289.
MacLean, P. The Triune Brain in Evolution: Role in Paleocerebral
Functions. New York: Plenum Press, 1990.
Montgomery, Paul Macrae. Speech. “Stocks and the Irrational: Pos-
sible Sub-Cortical Influences on Contemporary Equity Market
Pricing.” September 19, 1991.
Montgomery, Paul Macrae. Speech. “Capital Markets and the Irra-
tional: Possible Non-Cortical Influences on the Price Structure
of Investments.” September 13, 1992.
Olsen, R. “Implications of Herding Behavior” Financial Analysts
Journal, July/August, (1996), pp. 37–41.
Passell, Peter. “Dow and Reason: Distant Cousins?” The New York
Times, (August 25, 1989).
Pigou,Arthur C. The Economics of Welfare.London: F.Cass, 1920.
Pigou, Arthur C. Industrial Fluctuations. London: F. Cass, 1927.
Smith, Vernon L., Gerry L. Suchanek and Arlington W. Williams.
“Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experi-
mental Spot Asset Markets.” Econometrica, 56, (1988), pp.
1119–1151.
Sornette, Didier, and Andres Johansen. “Large Financial Crashes.
Physica A—Statistical and Theoretical Physics, eds. Capel,
H.W., B. Mulder, H. E. Stanley, and C. Tsallis, 245, (1997).
Vittachi, Nury and Marc Faber. Riding the Millennial Storm: Marc
Faber’s Path to Profit in the Financial Crisis. New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 1998.
125
UNCONSCIOUS HERDING BEHAVIOR
... W hile, o n one side, mainstream-neoclassical-economists argue that the occurrence of herds can be incorporated into rational theories by the introduction and development of concepts such as social learning, information cascades, and limited memo ries (Chamley,2004); on the other side, so me economists show reluctance to the attempts of rationalization of what is commonly perceived as irrational and exuberant (Shiller, 2000). In addition, neuroscience has also given some light by suggesting that herding results from active mental activity in individuals as responses to others' behavioral signals, responses that are indeed faster than rational decisions in most emotional situations (Prechter Jr., 2001;Yao, Ma & He, 2014). ...
... For instance, effects of extreme increments of fears are different from the ones of extreme decreases. Mo st psycho lo gical literature just suppo rts the influence that emotional-mood or fear increases could have on herding (Raafat, Chater & Frith, 2009;Magesan, 2012, Spyrou, 2013Baddeley, 2010;Prechter Jr., 2001), therefore, just these positive changes-just around 85 samples for each market-are evaluated. Having in mind all these limitations, in the best case, it just can be said that some whispers of an influence are detected in certain cases, with a main exception in the Chinese markets. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Carrasco-Villanueva, M. (2022). Herd Behavior in Emerging Stock Markets: China, Taiwan, and Japan. In: Contemporary Issues on Central Bank Digital Currency. New Delhi, India: Kunal Books, pp. 23-55. ISBN 978-93-91908-09-6.
... In some cases, this behaviour can lead to physicians adopting wrong recommendations. Social influences have been vastly studied in the context of stock markets [16][17][18][19][20]. There experiments have shown that even in the ideal environment of perfect knowledge, the study participants followed the decision of others, creating bubbles and market crashes [19]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Previous observational studies have indicated that social influences, such as arising from herding-like behaviour, can contribute to medical errors. In this study, we experimentally examined whether general practitioners (GPs) would follow incorrect prescription recommendations from fellow GP or specialists. To investigate this, we conducted an online survey with 475 GPs practicing in England that included two case vignettes. Case vignette 1 focused on sleeping tablets, and case vignette 2 was centred around antibiotics. The vignettes were presented in random order, and within each vignette, study participants were assigned to one of three experimental conditions: control condition (lacking peer recommendation), fellow GP condition (including a recommendation from a fellow GP not aligned with best practice clinical guidelines), or specialist condition (including a recommendation from a specialist not aligned with best practice clinical guidelines). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of GPs who prescribed medication that deviated from best practice clinical guidelines. We found that, in both case vignettes, the percentage of respondents prescribing such medication was highest in those assigned to the specialist condition, followed by those assigned to the control condition. It was lowest in those assigned to the fellow GP condition (case vignette 1: 73.8% vs. 55.6% vs. 36.6% and case vignette 2: 24.0% vs. 12.4% vs. 10.1%). In the case of vignette 1, the difference between the fellow GP condition and the control condition is statistically significant, suggesting that GPs are less likely to prescribe sleeping tablets when recommended by a fellow GP. This implies that GPs are more inclined to prescribe non-guideline-recommended medication when advised by specialists. This study is the first to experimentally demonstrate that physician herding behaviour can result in prescription errors. Future research could extend this inquiry to diverse contexts, including diagnosis.
... During pessimistic market conditions, investors typically tend to mirror market movements (Gleason et al., 2004). Prechter (2001) observed that herding tendencies become apparent during market fluctuations, propelled by investors' pursuit of maximizing gains while minimizing losses. A significant drop in the market can induce instability in the financial sector and spur substantial market fluctuations (Demirer & Kutan, 2006), posing risks to the stability of Indonesia's capital market. ...
Article
Full-text available
The occurrence of several crises in recent decades has led to significant uncertainty in the capital market, potentially fostering tendencies for herd behavior. This conduct may manifest in situations of asymmetry when the market experiences varying conditions (market up and down). Herd behavior in asymmetric can be driven by a variety of global influences, such as the Federal Funds Rate and the world oil price. The aim of this research is to investigate whether herd behavior exists under asymmetric conditions, and to explore the influence of global factors on such behavior within the manufacturing sectors listed in the capital markets of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand using daily closing stock price information from January 2015 to December 2022. This research utilizes a cross-sectional dispersion methodology and incorporates a dummy variable within the standard model to accomplish its research objective. The findings denote that asymmetric herding tendencies are evident solely among manufacturing firms listed on the Indonesian stock market during downturns, contrasting with the absence of such behavior in Malaysia and Thailand during market fluctuations. In Indonesia, global factors do not play a significant role in prompting asymmetric herding, whereas in Malaysia and Thailand, are more influenced by the Federal Funds Rate. Keywords: Asymmetric Herding; Market Up and Down; Federal Funds Rate; World Oil Price; Cross-Sectional Dispersion
... Therefore, herd psychology is mainly based on sociological theory and behavioral ecology. Meanwhile, the trend of crowd behavior has a certain influence on the decisions of investors in the market (Keynes 1930(Keynes , 1936(Keynes , 1937, causing convergence in buying or selling behavior simultaneously in the past periods of market stress (Prechter, 2001;Hwang and Salmon, 2004;Seetharam, 2013;Boortz et al., 2014;Rompotis, 2018;Economou, Hassapis and Phillippas, 2018). This convergence can cause asset price bubbles and shocks to stock market cycles, leading to the boom and bust phase of the cycle. ...
... The accuracy of crowdsourced forecasting stems from its diverse, independent contributors; however, this accuracy is threatened by herding behavior. Herding, a convergence of forecasts toward a consensus view, can lead to increased bias and reduced forecast accuracy (Olsen 1996;Prechter 2001;Jagadeesh & Kim, 2010). This is especially relevant in light of the finding that retail investors, who form a significant portion of crowdsourced forecasters, are more influenced by behavioral biases and public information than their professional counterparts (Chou & Wang 2011;Li et al. 2017;Nofsinger & Sias 1999). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the impact of firm-level investor sentiment derived from Twitter and news media on herding behavior among contributors on Estimize, a leading platform for crowdsourced earnings forecasts. The findings show that sentiment gleaned from tweets and news media content positively influences herding among Estimize contributors. Notably, herding intensifies when Twitter and news sentiment polarities align, while divergent sentiment polarities diminish this herding effect. Additionally, the analysis indicates that firms with investment-grade ratings and those characterized by low valuation uncertainty are particularly prone to sentiment-driven herding. Importantly, positive sentiment is identified as having a more potent influence on herding behavior than negative sentiment. By focusing on Estimize contributors, this study offers insights into how firm-level sentiment cues shape the crowd’s herding behavior, offering new perspectives on how different media sources shape the wisdom of the crowd.
Article
Individual investing decisions are crucial in determining one’s financial well-being, as these choices directly affect their financial health. The current study uses structured equation modelling based on survey data from 288 individual investors. We contribute to the growing body of literature by employing the conditional mediation model to investigate the interaction between financial literacy, firm characteristics, behavioural biases and their impact on investment choices. The study findings substantiate the critical role of a firm’s characteristics in mediating the relationship between financial literacy and investment choices. The findings highlight the importance of financial literacy in enabling investors to make informed decisions, accentuating the mediating role of a firm’s characteristics, which adds novelty to the study.
Article
Full-text available
This study examines the time-varying nature of investor herd behavior over different market episodes in Sri Lankan stock market, that has been subjected to convulsed periods such as civil war, political instability, terrorist attacks and COVID-19 pandemic. The study employs Cross-Sectional Absolute Deviation methodology, applying quantile regression approach, to detect aggregate level herding using a survivorship-bias-free dataset of daily firm level returns from April 2000 to March 2022. The dataset is subdivided into market episodes corresponding to pre-war, bubble, crash, post-crash, pre-COVID crash, COVID bubble and post-COVID crash periods. Exhibiting an evolutionary herding pattern over market episodes, the results depict that herding appears in pre-war period irrespective of the market directions, persisting in bubble episode in upmarket days, which then, turning into negative herding in down market days in crash episode. Subsequently, herding gradually disappears in post-crash episode, reappears with greater intensity in pre-COVID crash episode and disappears in COVID bubble and post-COVID crash episodes. This study attributes such wax and wane nature of herding in financial markets to a survival action, a rational heuristic, in keeping with Adaptive Market Hypothesis. The study is of peculiar importance to investors, policymakers, regulators and researchers, as presence of herding misprices securities and invalidates the existing asset pricing models constructed on the assumptions of investor rationality.
Article
Deep Dive into Share Trader Decision-Making: A Psychological, Social, and Economic Exploration This research delves into the intricate world of share trader decision-making, specifically focusing on the interplay between psychology, social dynamics, and economic factors. It aims to shed light on how these multifaceted influences shape investment choices and risk tolerance, particularly among the burgeoning generation of young adult traders (Gen Z).  Beyond Rationality: the Behavioral Dimension Investment decisions are often depicted as exercises in cold, calculated logic. However, the field of behavioral finance challenges this notion, highlighting the significant role of psychological biases. This study builds upon this established knowledge by exploring how these psychological factors, along with social and economic considerations, converge to influence trading decisions and risk tolerance within the Gen Z demographic.  Methodology: Unveiling the Underlying Factors To gather valuable insights, the study will employ a survey methodology utilizing a five-point Likert scale questionnaire. Disseminated through social media platforms, the survey aims to capture data from a broad range of participants. The primary target audience will be Gen Z respondents (aged 18-21), with a subset of participants from older generations included for comparative analysis. The questionnaire will be meticulously crafted to assess psychological factors (e.g., overconfidence, fear of missing out), social influences (e.g., peer pressure, online communities), economic considerations (e.g., market trends, interest rates), and risk tolerance.  Hypotheses: A Framework for Understanding The study proposes a set of four core hypotheses to guide the investigation:  Psychological Influence: Psychological factors, such as overconfidence or anchoring bias, significantly impact share traders' investment decisions.  Social Dynamics in Play: Social factors, including group dynamics and the influence of online communities, exert a substantial influence on share traders' decisions.  Economic Considerations as a Guidepost: Economic factors, encompassing market trends, interest rates, and company performance, provide valuable guidance for share traders' decision-making processes.  The Moderating Effect of Initial Trades: Initial trade decisions act as a moderator, influencing the relationship between the aforementioned factors and an individual's risk tolerance.  Data Analysis: Unveiling the Relationships The collected data will be meticulously analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) software like SPSS AMOS. This powerful technique allows researchers to delve deeper by evaluating:  Confirmatory Factor Analysis: This analysis technique assesses the strength and validity of the relationships between the observed variables (survey questions) and the underlying latent variables (psychological factors, social factors, etc.). It essentially confirms that the survey questions are effectively capturing the intended constructs.  Path Coefficients: Path coefficients quantify the direct effects of each factor (psychological, social, economic) on risk tolerance. Additionally, the analysis will explore whether initial trade decisions moderate these effects, meaning they influence the strength of the relationship between the factors and risk tolerance.  Expected Outcomes: Illuminating the Path Forward This research aspires to achieve the following key outcomes:Demystifying Decision-Making: Identify the relative influence of psychological, social, and economic factors on Gen Z share traders' decisions.  Understanding Risk Tolerance: Elucidate how these factors interact and contribute to the development of risk tolerance among young adult investors.  Empowering Traders: Equip individual traders with valuable insights to bolster their decision-making processes and risk management strategies.  Informing Financial Literacy: Provide insights for policymakers and educators to design financial literacy programs and regulations that cater to the specific needs and preferences of young adult investors.  Acknowledging Limitations: A Call for Further Exploration The study acknowledges inherent limitations, such as the potential for self-reported bias in survey responses. Additionally, the initial focus on a specific age group (Gen Z) within a limited geographical area (India) necessitates further research to explore potential cultural and demographic variations in financial decision-making. This research serves as a springboard for future investigations, paving the way for a more comprehensive understanding of the nuanced interplay between psychological, social, and economic factors in shaping financial decision-making across diverse demographics and cultural contexts.
Article
Full-text available
In the capital market, people suffer from many biases, which causes the emergence of irrational behaviors. For this reason, people are often exposed to a significant level of risk; to get rid of it, they behave like others. Based on this, the aim of this research is to answer the question "Does the loss aversion scam have a significant effect on the formation of herding behavior among the investors of the Tehran Stock Exchange?". To achieve this goal, an online analytical questionnaire with 411 investors was designed to collect primary data, and multiple regression analysis was used to analyze and interpret the data. The findings of this research show that loss aversion has a positive and significant effect on herding behavior and one of the reasons for such behavior among investors is that people who are loss averse always try to model herding behavior, assuming that others feel the same way as themselves. On the other hand, the results showed that those who rely on their own knowledge also show herding behavior, especially when people learn about the knowledge of others, they rely more on their perceived knowledge, and herding behavior gains strength. Another result indicates that investors who see their performance as high have the same performance as others and follow the behavior of others in the market.
Article
Full-text available
Spot asset trading is studied where the only external source of value is an independent draw from a common information dividend distribution at the end of each of fifteen trading periods. Fourteen of twenty-two experiments exhibit price bubbles. This tendency to bubble decreases with trader experience. The regression of changes in mean price on lagged excess bids (bids minus offers in the previous period) supports the hypothesis that the intercept is minus the one-period expected dividend value, and the slope is positive, where excess bids measures excess demand attributable to homegrown capital gains expectations. Copyright 1988 by The Econometric Society.
Article
Experts' earnings predictions exhibit positive bias and disappointing accuracy. These shortcomings are usually attributed to some combination of incomplete knowledge, incompetence, and/or misrepresentation. This article suggests that the human desire for consensus leads to herding behavior among earnings forecasters. Herding results in a reduction in the dispersion and an increase in the mean of the distribution of expert forecasts, creating positive bias and inaccuracy in published earnings estimates. Investors mistake reduced dispersion for reduced risk and positive bias for high future returns. These misperceptions lead to abnormally low returns from stocks with unpredictable earning streams.
Article
Emotion and cognition are mediated by separate but interacting systems of the brain. The core of the emotional system is a network that evaluates (computes) the biological significance of stimuli, including stimuli from the external or internal environment or from within the brain (thoughts, images, memories). The computation of stimulus significance takes place prior to and independent of conscious awareness, with only the computational products reaching awareness, and only in some instances. The amygdala may be a focal structure in the affective network. By way of neural interactions between the amygdala and brain areas involved in cognition (particularly the neocortex and hippocampus), affect can influence cognition and cognition can influence affect. Emotional experiences, it is proposed, result when stimulus representations, affect representations, and self representations coincide in working memory.
Article
We propose that large stock market crashes are analogous to critical points studied in statistical physics with log-periodic correction to scaling. We extend our previous renormalization group model of stock market prices prior to and after crashes (D. Sornette, A. Johansen, J.P. Bouchaud, J. Phys. I France 6 (1996) 167) by including the first non-linear correction. This predicts the existence of a log-frequency shift over time in the log-periodic oscillations prior to a crash. This is tested on the two largest historical crashes of the century, the October 1929 and October 1987 crashes, by fitting the stock market index over an interval of 8 yr prior to the crashes. The good quality of the fits, as well as the consistency of the parameter values obtained from the two crashes, promote the theory that crashes have their origin in the collective “crowd” behavior of many interacting agents.
Large Financial Crashes Physica A—Statistical and Theoretical Physics
  • Sornette
  • Andres Didier
  • Johansen
Sornette, Didier, and Andres Johansen. " Large Financial Crashes. " Physica A—Statistical and Theoretical Physics, eds. Capel, H.W., B. Mulder, H. E. Stanley, and C. Tsallis, 245, (1997).